scientific research publishing

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

• View all journals
• Explore content
• About the journal
• Publish with us
• Sign up for alerts

Publish with Scientific Reports

We're an open-access journal publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research from across the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering.

Announcements

Journal Metrics

• *2023 Journal Citation Reports® Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2024).

Calls for Papers

• The median time from submission to acceptance for papers submitted to our Guest Edited Collections is 102 days.

Top 100 Collections

• *Data obtained from SN Insights which is based on Digital Science's Dimensions.

• Engineering

We are delighted to announce that Scientific Reports is now expanding its scope to include engineering disciplines.

Advertisement

Browse articles

Physical sciences.

Peak response regularization for localization

• Jinzhen Yao

Mass spectrometry-based metabolomics study of nicotine exposure in THP-1 monocytes

• Silvio Uhlig
• Bergitte Pearl Olderbø
• Oscar Daniel Rangel-Huerta

Multi-optimization for thermal deformation of gravitational wave telescope based on CFRP characteristics

Experimental investigation of radiation shielding competence of B 2 O 3 -Na 2 O-Al 2 O 3 -BaO-CaO glass system

• Esraa H. Abdel-Gawad
• M. I. Sayyed
• Mohamed Elsafi

Information encoding and encryption in acoustic analogues of qubits

• Akinsanmi S. Ige
• David Cavalluzzi
• Pierre A. Deymier

Subjects within Physical sciences

• Astronomy and planetary science
• Energy science and technology
• Materials science
• Mathematics and computing
• Nanoscience and technology
• Optics and photonics

Earth and environmental sciences

A study of the evolutionary game of carbon offset involving tourism stakeholders under incentive and constraint mechanisms

• Changjiang Xiong

Physical features of Adam’s Bridge interpreted from ICESat-2 based high-resolution digital bathymetric elevation model

• Giribabu Dandabathula
• Koushik Ghosh
• Prakash Chauhan

Development and experimental validation of analytical models for water and mud inrushes through a filled karst conduit

• Hongwen Jing

High-precision object detection network for automate pear picking

• Peirui Zhao
• Wenhua Zhou

Restoration of vegetation in the Yellow River Basin of Inner Mongolia is limited by geographic factors

• Xigang Xing
• Xiaoming Ma

Subjects within Earth and environmental sciences

• Biogeochemistry
• Climate sciences
• Environmental sciences
• Environmental social sciences
• Natural hazards
• Ocean sciences
• Planetary science
• Solid Earth sciences
• Space physics

Biological sciences

Cytosolic N-terminal formyl-methionine deformylation derives cancer stem cell features and tumor progression

• Jongeun Lee
• Cheol-Sang Hwang

Monarch butterfly conservation through male germplasm cryopreservation

• Courtney C. Grula
• Arun Rajamohan
• Joseph P. Rinehart

Insights into the genomic and functional divergence of NAT gene family to serve microbial secondary metabolism

• Sotiria Boukouvala
• Evanthia Kontomina
• Sokratis Zekkas

Mineral accumulation, relative water content and gas exchange are the main physiological regulating mechanisms to cope with salt stress in barley

• Faiza Boussora
• Tebra Triki
• Ferdaous Guasmi

Hyaluronidase inhibitor delphinidin inhibits cancer metastasis

• Jeremy McGuire
• Taketo Taguchi
• Vera Gorbunova

Subjects within Biological sciences

• Biochemistry
• Biological techniques
• Biotechnology
• Cell biology
• Chemical biology
• Computational biology and bioinformatics
• Developmental biology
• Drug discovery
• Microbiology
• Molecular biology
• Neuroscience
• Plant sciences
• Structural biology
• Systems biology

Health sciences

Determinants of hemoglobin level and time to default from highly active antiretroviral therapy (haart) for adult clients living with hiv under treatment; a retrospective cohort study design.

• Nurye Seid Muhie
• Awoke Seyoum Tegegne

Metagenomic analysis revealed the association between gut microbiota and different ovary responses to controlled ovarian stimulation

Efficacy, drug sustainability, and safety of ustekinumab treatment in Crohn’s disease patients over three years

• Laszlo J. Barkai
• Lorant Gonczi

Prostate cancer diagnosis based on multi-parametric MRI, clinical and pathological factors using deep learning

• Haniye Sherafatmandjoo
• Ali A. Safaei
• Farzad Allameh

Amyloid beta is associated with carotid wall echolucency and atherosclerotic plaque composition

• Dimitrios Delialis
• Georgios Georgiopoulos
• Kimon Stamatelopoulos

Subjects within Health sciences

• Endocrinology
• Gastroenterology
• Health care
• Health occupations
• Medical research
• Molecular medicine
• Pathogenesis
• Rheumatology
• Risk factors
• Signs and symptoms

Trending - Altmetric

Ancient Egyptian scribes and specific skeletal occupational risk markers (Abusir, Old Kingdom)

A new small-sized predatory pseudosuchian archosaur from the Middle-Late Triassic of Southern Brazil

Insights into the abundance and diversity of abyssal megafauna in a polymetallic-nodule region in the eastern Clarion-Clipperton Zone

Global impacts of heat and water stress on food production and severe food insecurity

Science jobs, postdoc researcher, magnetic recording materials group, national institute for materials science.

Starting date would be after January 2025, but it is negotiable.

National Institute for Materials Science

Tenure-Track/Tenured Faculty Positions

Tenure-Track/Tenured Faculty Positions in the fields of energy and resources.

Suzhou, Jiangsu, China

School of Sustainable Energy and Resources at Nanjing University

Postdoctoral Associate- Statistical Genetics

Houston, Texas (US)

Baylor College of Medicine (BCM)

Senior Research Associate (Single Cell/Transcriptomics Senior Bioinformatician)

Metabolic Research Laboratories at the Clinical School, University of Cambridge are recruiting 3 senior bioinformatician specialists to create a dynam

Cambridge, Cambridgeshire (GB)

University of Cambridge

Cancer Biology Postdoctoral Fellow

Tampa, Florida

Moffitt Cancer Center

This journal is a member of and subscribes to the principles of the Committee on Publication Ethics.

Quick links

• Explore articles by subject
• Guide to authors
• Editorial policies

• Search Search
• CN (Chinese)
• DE (German)
• ES (Spanish)
• FR (Français)
• JP (Japanese)
• Open Research
• Booksellers
• Peer Reviewers
• Springer Nature Group ↗

Advancing Discovery

Springer Nature advances discovery by publishing trusted research, supporting the development of new ideas and championing open science. We are committed to playing our part in accelerating solutions to address the world’s urgent challenges.

Search our content

Search in all books, journals, and other materials published by Springer, Nature Research, and BMC

License our content

Get access to all our content. A licence is available to academic institutions, governments and corporations

Publish with us

Aiming to give you the best publishing experience at every step of your research career.

Open Access Report 2022

Discover how Springer Nature is advancing the transition to open access (OA).

• Latest News ↗
• Buy a book or journal ↗
• Our products

By opening up access to all outputs of research, we speed up the progress of science. By being open, we make science and research more equitable, inclusive and effective for all

Initiatives

Women in Science

Women have come a long way in enriching the scientific community - yet there's still more to be achieved. We are recognizing women researchers.

Sustainable Development Goals

Springer Nature's Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) Programme aims to connect the researchers who are tackling the world’s toughest challenges with the practitioners in policy and business who need those insights

DEI in Research Publishing

We all play a pivotal role in championing inclusive practices and ensuring we reflect our diverse communities through our publication process. Discover how our Editors are empowered in doing this through training tools and resources. 

Partnerships

We work with others to find and drive forward solutions for the research community

SDGs and the impact of open research

A partnership with VSNU and the UKB providing data, insights and tools to advance knowledge about how academic research and open research is having a societal impact and accelerating delivery of the SDGs

ORCID: Share your discoveries, receive recognition

ORCID identifiers give researchers a personal, permanent digital code that distinguishes them from every other researcher and links to their publication record, ensuring their work is properly and duly recognized.

In Review: integrated preprint sharing

Share a preprint of your manuscript on the Research Square platform and get real time updates on your manuscript’s progress through peer review. 

Featured blog posts from "Springboard" See all

Springer Nature's blog on all things open research 

Open research

Leveraging the ocean of opportunities to drive value to research communities

Our CPO Harsh Jegadeesan on the OCEAN of opportuniteis to drive value to research communities

Research Solutions

Meeting the Needs and Expectations of Today’s Digital Native Researchers

Frank Vrancken Peeters, CEO discusses unlocking AI's potential at Springer Nature.

Open for Progress

Stefan von Holtzbrinck and Frank Vrancken Peeters introduce Springer Nature's latest Sustainable Business report, Open for Progress.

Investing in a gender equal research future - International Women’s Day 2024

Rachel Jacobs disucsses how Springer Nature is investing in women through its publishing, business and external activities.

Featured blog posts from "The Source" See all

Providing insight and discussion for researchers on publishing in the academic world

Transfer Desk for Editors

We do a deep dive into our Transfer Desk service by addressing common questions that editors have about transfers and how they work.

A researcher’s guide to open access agreements

This guide brings together everything you need to know to help you get the most from Springer Nature’s open access agreements.

SN SDG Programme

Five key takeaways from our Science for a Sustainable Future webinar series

Learn about the main discussion themes and key takeaways from the Science for a Sustainable Future webinar series.

Research Integrity

All about research integrity: a beginner's guide & an in-depth course

A guide and an in-depth course on research integrity and its application to your research and work.

Blog posts from "The Link" Startpage "The Link"

News, initiatives, and community spotlights for information professionals​ 

artifical intelligence

Three ways Generative AI can give Research Managers “superpowers”

Find out how generative AI can give research managers superpowers by automating tasks, spotting patterns, and simplifying research. Making their work easier and more efficient with AI.

Publishing SDG research: Initiatives that support your institution’s efforts

Discover how Springer Nature collaborates with librarians and research managers to promote the SDGs through impactful research and strategic initiatives, driving progress towards a sustainable future.

Supporting DEI in research: What researchers need from institutions

How institutions can support researchers’ DEI needs? Discover key strategies for fostering diversity, equity, and inclusion in research, and learn how institutions play a crucial role in supporting these initiatives.

author services

Virtual versus in-person seminars: Which training support is most beneficial?

Benefits and drawbacks of virtual vs. in-person researcher training: Get expert insights to choose the right format for your researchers, from Nature Masterclasses Lead Trainer, Dr. Jeffrey Robens.

advancing discovery

Navigating the evolving role of research managers: Insights from INORMS Council members

Gain valuable insights into the critical role of research management from INORMS Council members. Discover the challenges, importance, and evolving landscape of this profession in academia

Game Changers

Enhancing science education, communication and collaboration: the real-world benefits of Reviews, News & Opinion content

How does Reviews, News & Opinion content benefit researchers? Read about the different types of Reviews, News & Opinion content and how it maximises research impact, with real-world benefits.

Global research collaboration strategies that support researchers

Global research collaborations in published papers increase complexity. A recent webinar emphasises using bibliometric data to navigate partnerships, aiding institutions and researchers.

open access

Open access and the mission of the academic library

The mission of the library is to meet the needs of researchers. While those needs may be changing, the determination to facilitate access to quality research is more evolution than revolution.

How the Japan pilot transformative agreement is helping researchers achieve greater impact

The Japan pilot transformative agreement (TA) officially came into effect on 01 January 2023. Within the framework of this agreement, we anticipated the publication of nearly 900 open access (OA) articles in its first year by researchers in Japan. So how has this agreement fared thus far?

Driving open access transformation: Insights from the Charleston Conference 2023

Charleston Conference 2023 explores the forefront of open access (OA), featuring expert insights on transformative agreements and practical tips, illuminating the global shift from subscriptions to OA

Empowering librarians to promote open access

Open Access Week (23-29 October 2023) was a great opportunity to consider what open access (OA) means, how the transition is going, and what’s next. Since its introduction, publishing OA has proven to have demonstrable impacts on the usage, accessibility, and engagement with research, ensuring that key knowledge – such as that around the UN Sustainable Development Goals – can be accessed and used by all, some even influencing policy change.

Transitioning to open access: Reflections from three US organizations

Three leading organizations in the US share their experiences of how their agreements with Springer Nature have helped them to transition to OA. Unlock the secrets of science communication and see how organizations can back their researchers' storytelling skills. Join us in demystifying the art of making science relatable in this must-read blog

learning&development

The impact of good science communication, and how organisations can support

Unlock the secrets of science communication and see how organizations can back their researchers' storytelling skills. Join us in demystifying the art of making science relatable in this must-read blog

Librarian Service

The power of Customer Engagement Events: Where ideas flourish and connections thrive

The heart of these events beats with the rhythm of engaging exchanges among participants, leading to a wealth of benefits, sharing valuable experiences and perspectives

Open access agreements: Empowering librarians to be OA champions

Learn how open access agreements support open research, their benefits and impact for participating institutions, librarians, and researchers, including practical supporting tools.

Stay up to date

Here to foster information exchange with the library community

Connect with us on LinkedIn and stay up to date with news and development.

• Tools & Services
• Account Development
• Sales and account contacts
• Professional
• Press office
• Locations & Contact

We are a world leading research, educational and professional publisher. Visit our main website for more information.

• © 2024 Springer Nature
• General terms and conditions
• Your US State Privacy Rights
• Your Privacy Choices / Manage Cookies
• Accessibility
• Legal notice
• Help us to improve this site, send feedback.

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• Prev Chronic Dis

Successful Scientific Writing and Publishing: A Step-by-Step Approach

John k. iskander.

1 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia

Sara Beth Wolicki

2 Association of Schools and Programs of Public Health, Washington, District of Columbia

Rebecca T. Leeb

Paul z. siegel.

Scientific writing and publication are essential to advancing knowledge and practice in public health, but prospective authors face substantial challenges. Authors can overcome barriers, such as lack of understanding about scientific writing and the publishing process, with training and resources. The objective of this article is to provide guidance and practical recommendations to help both inexperienced and experienced authors working in public health settings to more efficiently publish the results of their work in the peer-reviewed literature. We include an overview of basic scientific writing principles, a detailed description of the sections of an original research article, and practical recommendations for selecting a journal and responding to peer review comments. The overall approach and strategies presented are intended to contribute to individual career development while also increasing the external validity of published literature and promoting quality public health science.

Introduction

Publishing in the peer-reviewed literature is essential to advancing science and its translation to practice in public health ( 1 , 2 ). The public health workforce is diverse and practices in a variety of settings ( 3 ). For some public health professionals, writing and publishing the results of their work is a requirement. Others, such as program managers, policy makers, or health educators, may see publishing as being outside the scope of their responsibilities ( 4 ).

Disseminating new knowledge via writing and publishing is vital both to authors and to the field of public health ( 5 ). On an individual level, publishing is associated with professional development and career advancement ( 6 ). Publications share new research, results, and methods in a trusted format and advance scientific knowledge and practice ( 1 , 7 ). As more public health professionals are empowered to publish, the science and practice of public health will advance ( 1 ).

Unfortunately, prospective authors face barriers to publishing their work, including navigating the process of scientific writing and publishing, which can be time-consuming and cumbersome. Often, public health professionals lack both training opportunities and understanding of the process ( 8 ). To address these barriers and encourage public health professionals to publish their findings, the senior author (P.Z.S.) and others developed Successful Scientific Writing (SSW), a course about scientific writing and publishing. Over the past 30 years, this course has been taught to thousands of public health professionals, as well as hundreds of students at multiple graduate schools of public health. An unpublished longitudinal survey of course participants indicated that two-thirds agreed that SSW had helped them to publish a scientific manuscript or have a conference abstract accepted. The course content has been translated into this manuscript. The objective of this article is to provide prospective authors with the tools needed to write original research articles of high quality that have a good chance of being published.

Basic Recommendations for Scientific Writing

Prospective authors need to know and tailor their writing to the audience. When writing for scientific journals, 4 fundamental recommendations are: clearly stating the usefulness of the study, formulating a key message, limiting unnecessary words, and using strategic sentence structure.

To demonstrate usefulness, focus on how the study addresses a meaningful gap in current knowledge or understanding. What critical piece of information does the study provide that will help solve an important public health problem? For example, if a particular group of people is at higher risk for a specific condition, but the magnitude of that risk is unknown, a study to quantify the risk could be important for measuring the population’s burden of disease.

Scientific articles should have a clear and concise take-home message. Typically, this is expressed in 1 to 2 sentences that summarize the main point of the paper. This message can be used to focus the presentation of background information, results, and discussion of findings. As an early step in the drafting of an article, we recommend writing out the take-home message and sharing it with co-authors for their review and comment. Authors who know their key point are better able to keep their writing within the scope of the article and present information more succinctly. Once an initial draft of the manuscript is complete, the take-home message can be used to review the content and remove needless words, sentences, or paragraphs.

Concise writing improves the clarity of an article. Including additional words or clauses can divert from the main message and confuse the reader. Additionally, journal articles are typically limited by word count. The most important words and phrases to eliminate are those that do not add meaning, or are duplicative. Often, cutting adjectives or parenthetical statements results in a more concise paper that is also easier to read.

Sentence structure strongly influences the readability and comprehension of journal articles. Twenty to 25 words is a reasonable range for maximum sentence length. Limit the number of clauses per sentence, and place the most important or relevant clause at the end of the sentence ( 9 ). Consider the sentences:

• By using these tips and tricks, an author may write and publish an additional 2 articles a year.
• An author may write and publish an additional 2 articles a year by using these tips and tricks.

The focus of the first sentence is on the impact of using the tips and tricks, that is, 2 more articles published per year. In contrast, the second sentence focuses on the tips and tricks themselves.

Authors should use the active voice whenever possible. Consider the following example:

• Active voice: Authors who use the active voice write more clearly.
• Passive voice: Clarity of writing is promoted by the use of the active voice.

The active voice specifies who is doing the action described in the sentence. Using the active voice improves clarity and understanding, and generally uses fewer words. Scientific writing includes both active and passive voice, but authors should be intentional with their use of either one.

Sections of an Original Research Article

Original research articles make up most of the peer-reviewed literature ( 10 ), follow a standardized format, and are the focus of this article. The 4 main sections are the introduction, methods, results, and discussion, sometimes referred to by the initialism, IMRAD. These 4 sections are referred to as the body of an article. Two additional components of all peer-reviewed articles are the title and the abstract. Each section’s purpose and key components, along with specific recommendations for writing each section, are listed below.

Title. The purpose of a title is twofold: to provide an accurate and informative summary and to attract the target audience. Both prospective readers and database search engines use the title to screen articles for relevance ( 2 ). All titles should clearly state the topic being studied. The topic includes the who, what, when, and where of the study. Along with the topic, select 1 or 2 of the following items to include within the title: methods, results, conclusions, or named data set or study. The items chosen should emphasize what is new and useful about the study. Some sources recommend limiting the title to less than 150 characters ( 2 ). Articles with shorter titles are more frequently cited than articles with longer titles ( 11 ). Several title options are possible for the same study ( Figure ).

Two examples of title options for a single study.

Abstract . The abstract serves 2 key functions. Journals may screen articles for potential publication by using the abstract alone ( 12 ), and readers may use the abstract to decide whether to read further. Therefore, it is critical to produce an accurate and clear abstract that highlights the major purpose of the study, basic procedures, main findings, and principal conclusions ( 12 ). Most abstracts have a word limit and can be either structured following IMRAD, or unstructured. The abstract needs to stand alone from the article and tell the most important parts of the scientific story up front.

Introduction . The purpose of the introduction is to explain how the study sought to create knowledge that is new and useful. The introduction section may often require only 3 paragraphs. First, describe the scope, nature, or magnitude of the problem being addressed. Next, clearly articulate why better understanding this problem is useful, including what is currently known and the limitations of relevant previous studies. Finally, explain what the present study adds to the knowledge base. Explicitly state whether data were collected in a unique way or obtained from a previously unstudied data set or population. Presenting both the usefulness and novelty of the approach taken will prepare the reader for the remaining sections of the article.

Methods . The methods section provides the information necessary to allow others, given the same data, to recreate the analysis. It describes exactly how data relevant to the study purpose were collected, organized, and analyzed. The methods section describes the process of conducting the study — from how the sample was selected to which statistical methods were used to analyze the data. Authors should clearly name, define, and describe each study variable. Some journals allow detailed methods to be included in an appendix or supplementary document. If the analysis involves a commonly used public health data set, such as the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System ( 13 ), general aspects of the data set can be provided to readers by using references. Because what was done is typically more important than who did it, use of the passive voice is often appropriate when describing methods. For example, “The study was a group randomized, controlled trial. A coin was tossed to select an intervention group and a control group.”

Results . The results section describes the main outcomes of the study or analysis but does not interpret the findings or place them in the context of previous research. It is important that the results be logically organized. Suggested organization strategies include presenting results pertaining to the entire population first, and then subgroup analyses, or presenting results according to increasing complexity of analysis, starting with demographic results before proceeding to univariate and multivariate analyses. Authors wishing to draw special attention to novel or unexpected results can present them first.

One strategy for writing the results section is to start by first drafting the figures and tables. Figures, which typically show trends or relationships, and tables, which show specific data points, should each support a main outcome of the study. Identify the figures and tables that best describe the findings and relate to the study’s purpose, and then develop 1 to 2 sentences summarizing each one. Data not relevant to the study purpose may be excluded, summarized briefly in the text, or included in supplemental data sets. When finalizing figures, ensure that axes are labeled and that readers can understand figures without having to refer to accompanying text.

Discussion . In the discussion section, authors interpret the results of their study within the context of both the related literature and the specific scientific gap the study was intended to fill. The discussion does not introduce results that were not presented in the results section. One way authors can focus their discussion is to limit this section to 4 paragraphs: start by reinforcing the study’s take-home message(s), contextualize key results within the relevant literature, state the study limitations, and lastly, make recommendations for further research or policy and practice changes. Authors can support assertions made in the discussion with either their own findings or by referencing related research. By interpreting their own study results and comparing them to others in the literature, authors can emphasize findings that are unique, useful, and relevant. Present study limitations clearly and without apology. Finally, state the implications of the study and provide recommendations or next steps, for example, further research into remaining gaps or changes to practice or policy. Statements or recommendations regarding policy may use the passive voice, especially in instances where the action to be taken is more important than who will implement the action.

Beginning the Writing Process

The process of writing a scientific article occurs before, during, and after conducting the study or analyses. Conducting a literature review is crucial to confirm the existence of the evidence gap that the planned analysis seeks to fill. Because literature searches are often part of applying for research funding or developing a study protocol, the citations used in the grant application or study proposal can also be used in subsequent manuscripts. Full-text databases such as PubMed Central ( 14 ), NIH RePORT ( 15 ), and CDC Stacks ( 16 ) can be useful when performing literature reviews. Authors should familiarize themselves with databases that are accessible through their institution and any assistance that may be available from reference librarians or interlibrary loan systems. Using citation management software is one way to establish and maintain a working reference list. Authors should clearly understand the distinction between primary and secondary references, and ensure that they are knowledgeable about the content of any primary or secondary reference that they cite.

Review of the literature may continue while organizing the material and writing begins. One way to organize material is to create an outline for the paper. Another way is to begin drafting small sections of the article such as the introduction. Starting a preliminary draft forces authors to establish the scope of their analysis and clearly articulate what is new and novel about the study. Furthermore, using information from the study protocol or proposal allows authors to draft the methods and part of the results sections while the study is in progress. Planning potential data comparisons or drafting “table shells” will help to ensure that the study team has collected all the necessary data. Drafting these preliminary sections early during the writing process and seeking feedback from co-authors and colleagues may help authors avoid potential pitfalls, including misunderstandings about study objectives.

The next step is to conduct the study or analyses and use the resulting data to fill in the draft table shells. The initial results will most likely require secondary analyses, that is, exploring the data in ways in addition to those originally planned. Authors should ensure that they regularly update their methods section to describe all changes to data analysis.

After completing table shells, authors should summarize the key finding of each table or figure in a sentence or two. Presenting preliminary results at meetings, conferences, and internal seminars is an established way to solicit feedback. Authors should pay close attention to questions asked by the audience, treating them as an informal opportunity for peer review. On the basis of the questions and feedback received, authors can incorporate revisions and improvements into subsequent drafts of the manuscript.

The relevant literature should be revisited periodically while writing to ensure knowledge of the most recent publications about the manuscript topic. Authors should focus on content and key message during the process of writing the first draft and should not spend too much time on issues of grammar or style. Drafts, or portions of drafts, should be shared frequently with trusted colleagues. Their recommendations should be reviewed and incorporated when they will improve the manuscript’s overall clarity.

For most authors, revising drafts of the manuscript will be the most time-consuming task involved in writing a paper. By regularly checking in with coauthors and colleagues, authors can adopt a systematic approach to rewriting. When the author has completed a draft of the manuscript, he or she should revisit the key take-home message to ensure that it still matches the final data and analysis. At this point, final comments and approval of the manuscript by coauthors can be sought.

Authors should then seek to identify journals most likely to be interested in considering the study for publication. Initial questions to consider when selecting a journal include:

• Which audience is most interested in the paper’s message?
• Would clinicians, public health practitioners, policy makers, scientists, or a broader audience find this useful in their field or practice?
• Do colleagues have prior experience submitting a manuscript to this journal?
• Is the journal indexed and peer-reviewed?
• Is the journal subscription or open-access and are there any processing fees?
• How competitive is the journal?

Authors should seek to balance the desire to be published in a top-tier journal (eg, Journal of the American Medical Association, BMJ, or Lancet) against the statistical likelihood of rejection. Submitting the paper initially to a journal more focused on the paper’s target audience may result in a greater chance of acceptance, as well as more timely dissemination of findings that can be translated into practice. Most of the 50 to 75 manuscripts published each week by authors from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) are published in specialty and subspecialty journals, rather than in top-tier journals ( 17 ).

The target journal’s website will include author guidelines, which will contain specific information about format requirements (eg, font, line spacing, section order, reference style and limit, table and figure formatting), authorship criteria, article types, and word limits for articles and abstracts.

We recommend returning to the previously drafted abstract and ensuring that it complies with the journal’s format and word limit. Authors should also verify that any changes made to the methods or results sections during the article’s drafting are reflected in the final version of the abstract. The abstract should not be written hurriedly just before submitting the manuscript; it is often apparent to editors and reviewers when this has happened. A cover letter to accompany the submission should be drafted; new and useful findings and the key message should be included.

Before submitting the manuscript and cover letter, authors should perform a final check to ensure that their paper complies with all journal requirements. Journals may elect to reject certain submissions on the basis of review of the abstract, or may send them to peer reviewers (typically 2 or 3) for consultation. Occasionally, on the basis of peer reviews, the journal will request only minor changes before accepting the paper for publication. Much more frequently, authors will receive a request to revise and resubmit their manuscript, taking into account peer review comments. Authors should recognize that while revise-and-resubmit requests may state that the manuscript is not acceptable in its current form, this does not constitute a rejection of the article. Authors have several options in responding to peer review comments:

• Performing additional analyses and updating the article appropriately
• Declining to perform additional analyses, but providing an explanation (eg, because the requested analysis goes beyond the scope of the article)
• Providing updated references
• Acknowledging reviewer comments that are simply comments without making changes

In addition to submitting a revised manuscript, authors should include a cover letter in which they list peer reviewer comments, along with the revisions they have made to the manuscript and their reply to the comment. The tone of such letters should be thankful and polite, but authors should make clear areas of disagreement with peer reviewers, and explain why they disagree. During the peer review process, authors should continue to consult with colleagues, especially ones who have more experience with the specific journal or with the peer review process.

There is no secret to successful scientific writing and publishing. By adopting a systematic approach and by regularly seeking feedback from trusted colleagues throughout the study, writing, and article submission process, authors can increase their likelihood of not only publishing original research articles of high quality but also becoming more scientifically productive overall.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge PCD ’s former Associate Editor, Richard A. Goodman, MD, MPH, who, while serving as Editor in Chief of CDC’s Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report Series, initiated a curriculum on scientific writing for training CDC’s Epidemic Intelligence Service Officers and other CDC public health professionals, and with whom the senior author of this article (P.Z.S.) collaborated in expanding training methods and contents, some of which are contained in this article. The authors acknowledge Juan Carlos Zevallos, MD, for his thoughtful critique and careful editing of previous Successful Scientific Writing materials. We also thank Shira Eisenberg for editorial assistance with the manuscript. This publication was supported by the Cooperative Agreement no. 1U360E000002 from CDC and the Association of Schools and Programs of Public Health. The findings and conclusions of this article do not necessarily represent the official views of CDC or the Association of Schools and Programs of Public Health. Names of journals and citation databases are provided for identification purposes only and do not constitute any endorsement by CDC.

The opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions.

Suggested citation for this article: Iskander JK, Wolicki SB, Leeb RT, Siegel PZ. Successful Scientific Writing and Publishing: A Step-by-Step Approach. Prev Chronic Dis 2018;15:180085. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd15.180085 .

Unfortunately we don't fully support your browser. If you have the option to, please upgrade to a newer version or use Mozilla Firefox , Microsoft Edge , Google Chrome , or Safari 14 or newer. If you are unable to, and need support, please send us your feedback .

We'd appreciate your feedback. Tell us what you think! opens in new tab/window

7 steps to publishing in a scientific journal

April 5, 2021 | 10 min read

By Aijaz Shaikh, PhD

Before you hit “submit,” here’s a checklist (and pitfalls to avoid)

As scholars, we strive to do high-quality research that will advance science. We come up with what we believe are unique hypotheses, base our work on robust data and use an appropriate research methodology. As we write up our findings, we aim to provide theoretical insight, and share theoretical and practical implications about our work. Then we submit our manuscript for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. For many, this is the hardest part of research. In my seven years of research and teaching, I have observed several shortcomings in the manuscript preparation and submission process that often lead to research being rejected for publication. Being aware of these shortcomings will increase your chances of having your manuscript published and also boost your research profile and career progression.

Dr Aijaz Shaikh gives a presentation.

In this article, intended for doctoral students and other young scholars, I identify common pitfalls and offer helpful solutions to prepare more impactful papers. While there are several types of research articles, such as short communications, review papers and so forth, these guidelines focus on preparing a full article (including a literature review), whether based on qualitative or quantitative methodology, from the perspective of the management, education, information sciences and social sciences disciplines.

Writing for academic journals is a highly competitive activity, and it’s important to understand that there could be several reasons behind a rejection. Furthermore, the journal peer-review process is an essential element of publication because no writer could identify and address all potential issues with a manuscript.

1. Do not rush submitting your article for publication.

In my first article for Elsevier Connect – “Five secrets to surviving (and thriving in) a PhD program” – I emphasized that scholars should start writing during the early stages of your research or doctoral study career. This secret does not entail submitting your manuscript for publication the moment you have crafted its conclusion. Authors sometimes rely on the fact that they will always have an opportunity to address their work’s shortcomings after the feedback received from the journal editor and reviewers has identified them.

A proactive approach and attitude will reduce the chance of rejection and disappointment. In my opinion, a logical flow of activities dominates every research activity and should be followed for preparing a manuscript as well. Such activities include carefully re-reading your manuscript at different times and perhaps at different places. Re-reading is essential in the research field and helps identify the most common problems and shortcomings in the manuscript, which might otherwise be overlooked. Second, I find it very helpful to share my manuscripts with my colleagues and other researchers in my network and to request their feedback. In doing so, I highlight any sections of the manuscript that I would like reviewers to be absolutely clear on.

2. Select an appropriate publication outlet.

I also ask colleagues about the most appropriate journal to submit my manuscript to; finding the right journal for your article can dramatically improve the chances of acceptance and ensure it reaches your target audience.

Elsevier provides an innovative  Journal Finder opens in new tab/window  search facility on its website. Authors enter the article title, a brief abstract and the field of research to get a list of the most appropriate journals for their article. For a full discussion of how to select an appropriate journal see Knight and Steinbach (2008).

Less experienced scholars sometimes choose to submit their research work to two or more journals at the same time. Research ethics and policies of all scholarly journals suggest that authors should submit a manuscript to only one journal at a time. Doing otherwise can cause embarrassment and lead to copyright problems for the author, the university employer and the journals involved.

3. Read the aims and scope and author guidelines of your target journal carefully.

Once you have read and re-read your manuscript carefully several times, received feedback from your colleagues, and identified a target journal, the next important step is to read the aims and scope of the journals in your target research area. Doing so will improve the chances of having your manuscript accepted for publishing. Another important step is to download and absorb the author guidelines and ensure your manuscript conforms to them. Some publishers report that one paper in five does not follow the style and format requirements of the target journal, which might specify requirements for figures, tables and references.

Rejection can come at different times and in different formats. For instance, if your research objective is not in line with the aims and scope of the target journal, or if your manuscript is not structured and formatted according to the target journal layout, or if your manuscript does not have a reasonable chance of being able to satisfy the target journal’s publishing expectations, the manuscript can receive a desk rejection from the editor without being sent out for peer review. Desk rejections can be disheartening for authors, making them feel they have wasted valuable time and might even cause them to lose enthusiasm for their research topic. Sun and Linton (2014), Hierons (2016) and Craig (2010) offer useful discussions on the subject of “desk rejections.”

4. Make a good first impression with your title and abstract.

The title and abstract are incredibly important components of a manuscript as they are the first elements a journal editor sees. I have been fortunate to receive advice from editors and reviewers on my submissions, and feedback from many colleagues at academic conferences, and this is what I’ve learned:

The title should summarize the main theme of the article and reflect your contribution to the theory.

The abstract should be crafted carefully and encompass the aim and scope of the study; the key problem to be addressed and theory; the method used; the data set; key findings; limitations; and implications for theory and practice.

Dr. Angel Borja goes into detail about these components in “ 11 steps to structuring a science paper editors will take seriously .”

Learn more in Elsevier's free Researcher Academy opens in new tab/window

5. Have a professional editing firm copy-edit (not just proofread) your manuscript, including the main text, list of references, tables and figures.

The key characteristic of scientific writing is clarity. Before submitting a manuscript for publication, it is highly advisable to have a professional editing firm copy-edit your manuscript. An article submitted to a peer-reviewed journal will be scrutinized critically by the editorial board before it is selected for peer review. According to a statistic shared by Elsevier, between 30 percent and 50 percent of articles submitted to Elsevier journals are rejected before they even reach the peer-review stage, and one of the top reasons for rejection is poor language. A properly written, edited and presented text will be error free and understandable and will project a professional image that will help ensure your work is taken seriously in the world of publishing. On occasion, the major revisions conducted at the request of a reviewer will necessitate another round of editing. Authors can facilitate the editing of their manuscripts by taking precautions at their end. These include proofreading their own manuscript for accuracy and wordiness (avoid unnecessary or normative descriptions like “it should be noted here” and “the authors believe) and sending it for editing only when it is complete in all respects and ready for publishing. Professional editing companies charge hefty fees, and it is simply not financially viable to have them conduct multiple rounds of editing on your article. Applications like the spelling and grammar checker in Microsoft Word or Grammarly are certainly worth applying to your article, but the benefits of proper editing are undeniable. For more on the difference between proofreading and editing, see the description in Elsevier’s WebShop.

6. Submit a cover letter with the manuscript.

Never underestimate the importance of a cover letter addressed to the editor or editor-in-chief of the target journal. Last year, I attended a conference in Boston. A “meet the editors” session revealed that many submissions do not include a covering letter, but the editors-in-chief present, who represented renewed and ISI-indexed Elsevier journals, argued that the cover letter gives authors an important opportunity to convince them that their research work is worth reviewing.

Accordingly, the content of the cover letter is also worth spending time on. Some inexperienced scholars paste the article’s abstract into their letter thinking it will be sufficient to make the case for publication; it is a practice best avoided. A good cover letter first outlines the main theme of the paper; second, argues the novelty of the paper; and third, justifies the relevance of the manuscript to the target journal. I would suggest limiting the cover letter to half a page. More importantly, peers and colleagues who read the article and provided feedback before the manuscript’s submission should be acknowledged in the cover letter.

7. Address reviewer comments very carefully.

Editors and editors-in-chief usually couch the acceptance of a manuscript as subject to a “revise and resubmit” based on the recommendations provided by the reviewer or reviewers. These revisions may necessitate either major or minor changes in the manuscript. Inexperienced scholars should understand a few key aspects of the revision process. First, it important to address the revisions diligently; second, is imperative to address all the comments received from the reviewers and avoid oversights; third, the resubmission of the revised manuscript must happen by the deadline provided by the journal; fourth, the revision process might comprise multiple rounds. The revision process requires two major documents. The first is the revised manuscript highlighting all the modifications made following the recommendations received from the reviewers. The second is a letter listing the authors’ responses illustrating they have addressed all the concerns of the reviewers and editors. These two documents should be drafted carefully. The authors of the manuscript can agree or disagree with the comments of the reviewers (typically agreement is encouraged) and are not always obliged to implement their recommendations, but they should in all cases provide a well-argued justification for their course of action.

Given the ever increasing number of manuscripts submitted for publication, the process of preparing a manuscript well enough to have it accepted by a journal can be daunting. High-impact journals accept less than 10 percent of the articles submitted to them, although the acceptance ratio for special issues or special topics sections is normally over 40 percent. Scholars might have to resign themselves to having their articles rejected and then reworking them to submit them to a different journal before the manuscript is accepted.

The advice offered here is not exhaustive but it’s also not difficult to implement. These recommendations require proper attention, planning and careful implementation; however, following this advice could help doctoral students and other scholars improve the likelihood of getting their work published, and that is key to having a productive, exciting and rewarding academic career.

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Professor Heikki Karjaluoto, Jyväskylä University School of Business and Economics for providing valuable feedback on this article.

Sun, H., & Linton, J. D. (2014).

Structuring papers for success: Making your paper more like a high impact publication than a desk reject opens in new tab/window

Technovation.

Craig, J. B. (2010).

Desk rejection: How to avoid being hit by a returning boomerang opens in new tab/window

Family Business Review

Hierons, R. M. (2016).

The dreaded desk reject opens in new tab/window

, Software Testing, Verification and Reliability .

Borja, A (2014): 

11 steps to structuring a science paper editors will take seriously

Elsevier Connect

Knight, L. V., & Steinbach, T. A. (2008).

Selecting an appropriate publication outlet: a comprehensive model of journal selection criteria for researchers in a broad range of academic disciplines opens in new tab/window

, International Journal of Doctoral Studies .

Tewin, K. (2015).

How to Better Proofread An Article in 6 Simple Steps opens in new tab/window ,

Day, R, & Gastel, B: How to write and publish a scientific paper. Cambridge University Press (2012)

Contributor

Aijaz shaikh, phd.

SpringerOpen

The SpringerOpen portfolio has grown tremendously since its launch in 2010, so that we now offer researchers from all areas of science, technology, medicine, the humanities and social sciences a place to publish open access in journals. Publishing with SpringerOpen makes your work freely available online for everyone, immediately upon publication, and our high-level peer-review and production processes guarantee the quality and reliability of the work. Open access books are published by our Springer imprint.

Find the right journal for you

Explore our subject areas, learn all about open access.

• Browse our alphabetical journal list
• Explore our journals by subject
• Tips for finding the right journal
• Find the right journal with our Journal Suggester
• Find out if open access book publishing is right for you

• Visit our subject pages covering all subject areas in science, technology, medicine, the humanities and social sciences

Visit the Springer Author & Reviewer tutorials and learn all about open access, your benefits, mandates, funding, copyright and more in the different interactive tutorials. And take our quiz to test your knowledge!

• C heck out the free tutorials
• Take the quiz

Video library

Your browser needs to have JavaScript enabled to view this video

Our video library contains how-to videos, videos on the research we publish and journal videos. 

Navigation group

Home banner.

Where scientists empower society

Creating solutions for healthy lives on a healthy planet.

9.4 million

2.8 billion

article views and downloads

Main Content

• Editors and reviewers
• Collaborators

Find a journal

We have a home for your research. Our community led journals cover more than 1,500 academic disciplines and are some of the largest and most cited in their fields.

Submit your research

Start your submission and get more impact for your research by publishing with us.

Author guidelines

Ready to publish? Check our author guidelines for everything you need to know about submitting, from choosing a journal and section to preparing your manuscript.

Peer review

Our efficient collaborative peer review means you’ll get a decision on your manuscript in an average of 61 days.

Article publishing charges (APCs) apply to articles that are accepted for publication by our external and independent editorial boards

Press office

Visit our press office for key media contact information, as well as Frontiers’ media kit, including our embargo policy, logos, key facts, leadership bios, and imagery.

Institutional partnerships

Join more than 555 institutions around the world already benefiting from an institutional membership with Frontiers, including CERN, Max Planck Society, and the University of Oxford.

Publishing partnerships

Partner with Frontiers and make your society’s transition to open access a reality with our custom-built platform and publishing expertise.

Policy Labs

Connecting experts from business, science, and policy to strengthen the dialogue between scientific research and informed policymaking.

How we publish

All Frontiers journals are community-run and fully open access, so every research article we publish is immediately and permanently free to read.

Editor guidelines

Reviewing a manuscript? See our guidelines for everything you need to know about our peer review process.

Become an editor

Apply to join an editorial board and collaborate with an international team of carefully selected independent researchers.

My assignments

It’s easy to find and track your editorial assignments with our platform, 'My Frontiers' – saving you time to spend on your own research.

Scientists identify safe havens we must preserve to prevent "the sixth great extinction of life on Earth"

Conserving biodiversity hotspots which cover just 1.22% of the Earth’s terrestrial surface could stop extinctions in their tracks and protect the planet for future generations.

Safeguarding peer review to ensure quality at scale

Making scientific research open has never been more important. But for research to be trusted, it must be of the highest quality. Facing an industry-wide rise in fraudulent science, Frontiers has increased its focus on safeguarding quality.

Ecopreneur Prof Thomas Crowther to showcase the power of nature-based solutions at Frontiers Forum virtual event

Visionary ecologist and pioneer in reforestation and ecosystem restoration Prof Thomas Crowther will explore the vital role that nature plays in our fight against climate change, at a unique Frontiers Forum virtual event on 11 September.

Screen time not the main factor making parent-child interactions worse, study finds

Which is worse for parent-child interaction, if parents use their phones, or if they are distracted otherwise? A team of researchers investigated if the common perception that screens are bad for parent-child interactions holds.

Devastating fire 2,200 years ago preserved a moment of life and war in Iron Age Spain

Archaeologists’ excavation in the Iron Age site of Tossal de Baltarga has revealed a way of life derailed by violence: potentially, a forgotten episode of the war between Carthage and Rome.

World’s deepest sinkhole discovered in Mexico: Here are five Frontiers articles you won’t want to miss

At Frontiers, we bring some of the world’s best research to a global audience. But with tens of thousands of articles published each year, it’s impossible to cover all of them. Here are just five amazing papers you may have missed.

Biodiversity loss: 3 Research Topics revealing threats and solutions

In light of the crucial role of biodiversity to the health of our planet, we have listed three of our most impactful Research Topics on the causes and consequences of biodiversity loss.

Get the latest research updates, subscribe to our newsletter

• Advanced search
• Peer review

Discover relevant research today

Advance your research field in the open

Reach new audiences and maximize your readership

ScienceOpen puts your research in the context of

Publications

For Publishers

ScienceOpen offers content hosting, context building and marketing services for publishers. See our tailored offerings

• For academic publishers  to promote journals and interdisciplinary collections
• For open access journals  to host journal content in an interactive environment
• For university library publishing  to develop new open access paradigms for their scholars
• For scholarly societies  to promote content with interactive features

For Institutions

ScienceOpen offers state-of-the-art technology and a range of solutions and services

• For faculties and research groups  to promote and share your work
• For research institutes  to build up your own branding for OA publications
• For funders  to develop new open access publishing paradigms
• For university libraries to create an independent OA publishing environment

For Researchers

Make an impact and build your research profile in the open with ScienceOpen

• Search and discover relevant research in over 94 million Open Access articles and article records
• Share your expertise and get credit by publicly reviewing any article
• Publish your poster or preprint and track usage and impact with article- and author-level metrics
• Create a topical Collection  to advance your research field

Create a Journal powered by ScienceOpen

Launching a new open access journal or an open access press? ScienceOpen now provides full end-to-end open access publishing solutions – embedded within our smart interactive discovery environment. A modular approach allows open access publishers to pick and choose among a range of services and design the platform that fits their goals and budget.

Continue reading “Create a Journal powered by ScienceOpen”   

What can a Researcher do on ScienceOpen?

ScienceOpen provides researchers with a wide range of tools to support their research – all for free. Here is a short checklist to make sure you are getting the most of the technological infrastructure and content that we have to offer. What can a researcher do on ScienceOpen? Continue reading “What can a Researcher do on ScienceOpen?”   

ScienceOpen on the Road

Upcoming events.

• 15 June – Scheduled Server Maintenance, 13:00 – 01:00 CEST

Past Events

• 20 – 22 February – ResearcherToReader Conference
• 09 November – Webinar for the Discoverability of African Research
• 26 – 27 October – Attending the Workshop on Open Citations and Open Scholarly Metadata
• 18 – 22 October – ScienceOpen at Frankfurt Book Fair.
• 27 – 29 September – Attending OA Tage, Berlin .
• 25 – 27 September – ScienceOpen at Open Science Fair
• 19 – 21 September – OASPA 2023 Annual Conference .
• 22 – 24 May – ScienceOpen sponsoring Pint of Science, Berlin.
• 16-17 May – ScienceOpen at 3rd AEUP Conference.
• 20 – 21 April – ScienceOpen attending Scaling Small: Community-Owned Futures for Open Access Books .

What is ScienceOpen?

• Smart search and discovery within an interactive interface
• Researcher promotion and ORCID integration
• Open evaluation with article reviews and Collections
• Business model based on providing services to publishers

Live Twitter stream

Some of our partners:.

When you choose to publish with PLOS, your research makes an impact. Make your work accessible to all, without restrictions, and accelerate scientific discovery with options like preprints and published peer review that make your work more Open.

• PLOS Biology
• PLOS Climate
• PLOS Complex Systems
• PLOS Computational Biology
• PLOS Digital Health
• PLOS Genetics
• PLOS Global Public Health
• PLOS Medicine
• PLOS Mental Health
• PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
• PLOS Pathogens
• PLOS Sustainability and Transformation
• PLOS Collections

Welcome to the PLOS Writing Center

Your source for scientific writing & publishing essentials.

A collection of free, practical guides and hands-on resources for authors looking to improve their scientific publishing skillset.

ARTICLE-WRITING ESSENTIALS

Your title is the first thing anyone who reads your article is going to see, and for many it will be where they stop reading. Learn how to write a title that helps readers find your article, draws your audience in and sets the stage for your research!

The abstract is your chance to let your readers know what they can expect from your article. Learn how to write a clear, and concise abstract that will keep your audience reading.

A clear methods section impacts editorial evaluation and readers’ understanding, and is also the backbone of transparency and replicability. Learn what to include in your methods section, and how much detail is appropriate.

In many fields, a statistical analysis forms the heart of both the methods and results sections of a manuscript. Learn how to report statistical analyses, and what other context is important for publication success and future reproducibility.

The discussion section contains the results and outcomes of a study. An effective discussion informs readers what can be learned from your experiment and provides context for the results.

Ensuring your manuscript is well-written makes it easier for editors, reviewers and readers to understand your work. Avoiding language errors can help accelerate review and minimize delays in the publication of your research.

The PLOS Writing Toolbox

Delivered to your inbox every two weeks, the Writing Toolbox features practical advice and tools you can use to prepare a research manuscript for submission success and build your scientific writing skillset. 

Discover how to navigate the peer review and publishing process, beyond writing your article.

The path to publication can be unsettling when you’re unsure what’s happening with your paper. Learn about staple journal workflows to see the detailed steps required for ensuring a rigorous and ethical publication.

Reputable journals screen for ethics at submission—and inability to pass ethics checks is one of the most common reasons for rejection. Unfortunately, once a study has begun, it’s often too late to secure the requisite ethical reviews and clearances. Learn how to prepare for publication success by ensuring your study meets all ethical requirements before work begins.

From preregistration, to preprints, to publication—learn how and when to share your study.

How you store your data matters. Even after you publish your article, your data needs to be accessible and useable for the long term so that other researchers can continue building on your work. Good data management practices make your data discoverable and easy to use, promote a strong foundation for reproducibility and increase your likelihood of citations.

You’ve just spent months completing your study, writing up the results and submitting to your top-choice journal. Now the feedback is in and it’s time to revise. Set out a clear plan for your response to keep yourself on-track and ensure edits don’t fall through the cracks.

There’s a lot to consider when deciding where to submit your work. Learn how to choose a journal that will help your study reach its audience, while reflecting your values as a researcher.

Are you actively preparing a submission for a PLOS journal? Select the relevant journal below for more detailed guidelines. 

How to Write an Article  

Share the lessons of the Writing Center in a live, interactive training.

Access tried-and-tested training modules, complete with slides and talking points, workshop activities, and more.

Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology

Molecular level seasonality of dissolved organic matter in freshwater and its impact on drinking water treatment †.

* Corresponding authors

a Department of Thematic Studies – Environmental Change, Linköping University, SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden E-mail: [email protected]

b Department of Chemistry, State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, New York 13210, USA

c Research Unit Analytical BioGeoChemistry, Helmholtz Munich, Ingolstaedter Landstraße 1, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany

d Chair of Analytical Food Chemistry, Technical University of Munich, 85354 Freising, Germany

e University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Chesapeake Biological Laboratory, Solomons, Maryland 20688, USA

f Research Unit: Environmental Sciences and Management, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa

g Norrvatten, Kvalitet och Utveckling, SE-169 02 Solna, Sweden

h Nodra, Borgs vattenverk, SE-603 36 Norrköping, Sweden

Improved characterization of dissolved organic matter (DOM) in source waters used for drinking water treatment is necessary to optimize treatment processes and obtain high drinking water quality. In this study, seasonal differences in freshwater DOM composition and associated treatment-induced changes, were investigated at four drinking water treatment plants (DWTPs) in Sweden, during all seasons and a full-year. The objective was to understand how effectively DWTPs can adapt to seasonal changes and compare how optical and mass spectrometry methods detected these changes. In addition to bulk DOM analysis, this work focused on excitation–emission matrix (EEM) fluorescence including parallel factor (PARAFAC) analysis, and molecular level non-target analysis by Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry (FT-ICR MS). Overall, seasonal variability of raw water DOM composition was small and explained primarily by changes in the contributions of DOM with aromatic and phenolic moieties, which were more prevalent during spring in two surface water sources as indicated by absorbance measurements at 254 nm, computed specific ultraviolet absorbance (SUVA) and phenol concentrations. These changes could be balanced by coagulation, resulting in seasonally stable DOM characteristics of treated water. While EEM fluorescence and PARAFAC modelling effectively revealed DOM fingerprints of the different water sources, FT-ICR MS provided new insights into treatment selectivity on DOM composition at the molecular level. Future DOM monitoring of surface waters should target more specific seasonal DOM changes, such as features with a known impact on certain treatment processes or target certain events, like algal or cyanobacterial blooms.

Supplementary files

• Supplementary information PDF (4569K)

Article information

Download Citation

Permissions.

Molecular level seasonality of dissolved organic matter in freshwater and its impact on drinking water treatment

A. Andersson, L. Powers, M. Harir, M. Gonsior, N. Hertkorn, P. Schmitt-Kopplin, H. Kylin, D. Hellström, Ä. Pettersson and D. Bastviken, Environ. Sci.: Water Res. Technol. , 2024, Advance Article , DOI: 10.1039/D4EW00142G

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence . You can use material from this article in other publications without requesting further permissions from the RSC, provided that the correct acknowledgement is given.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content .

Social activity

Search articles by author.

This article has not yet been cited.

Advertisements

Scientific & Academic Publishing

SAP is an open access publisher of journals covering a wide range of academic disciplines.

Call for Special Issue Proposals

Feautured books, browse by subject.

• Architecture & Design
• Business & Management
• Chemistry & Physics
• Computer & Electrical Engineering
• Earth Sciences & Geography
• Energy & Engineering
• Environmental Sciences
• Food Science & Nutrition
• Life Sciences
• Materials Science
• Mathematics & Statistics
• Medicine & Public Health
• Sociology & Arts
• Science and Technology

Featured Journals

• Food and Public Health
• Advances in Life Sciences
• International Journal of Ecosystem
• International Journal of Agriculture and Forestry
• International Journal of Sports Science
• American Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences

Online Journals

Articles Published

Article Views

On Board Editors

Indexing Databases

International Distribution of SAP Editors

Our key strengths.

• Electronic Manuscript System

Open Access

• Enhanced International Reach

Just enter your email address below,we will share with you the latest information of journals published by SAP. Plus, you can easily unsubscribe at any time, and we'll never share your email address with anyone.

Latest Published Papers

Kinetics, Thermodynamic and Isotherms Modeling of the Equilibrium Sorption of Pb (II), Ni (II), and Cd (II) Ions into Tiger Nut Chaff ( Cyperus Esculentus ) from Model Wastewater

Olowu Rasaq Adewale, Osundiya Medina Olubunmi, Sobola Abdullahi Owolabi, Osifeko Olawale Lawrence, Tovide Oluwakemi Omotunde, Oyewole Toyib Seun, Elesho Adeseye Omololu, Onifade Olayinka Omoniyi, Majolagbe Abdulrafiu Olaiwola, Onwordi Chionyedua Theresa, Adejare Adeniyi Ayemu

Physical Chemistry , 2024, 13(2), pp. 19-31

DOI: 10.5923/j.pc.20241302.01

Full-Text HTML Download Full-Text PDF

837 Views   207 Downloads

Effects of Different Zn Doping Concentration on the Optical and Structural Properties of TiO 2 Nanoparticles

Gakuru Simon Waweru, Sharon Kiprotich, Peter Waithaka

Nanoscience and Nanotechnology , 2024, 13(1), pp. 1-9

DOI: 10.5923/j.nn.20241301.01

704 Views   121 Downloads

Structural and Optical Properties of ZnO:Al:Ga Co-Doped Nanoparticles: Investigation on the Effects of pH of the Precursor Solution via a Simple Sol-Gel Route

Kiprotich Bett, Sharon Kiprotich, Jatani Ungula, Warren Andayi

American Journal of Materials Science , 2024, 14(2), pp. 21-30

DOI: 10.5923/j.materials.20241402.01

884 Views   177 Downloads

Development of Technology for Obtaining Sodium Peroxide Sulfate

Bibigul Koshanova Turganbaevna, Dildora Tursunova Abdusattarovna, Aktam Erkaev Ulashovich, Nazokat Erkaeva Aktamovna

International Journal of Materials and Chemistry , 2024, 14(2), pp. 24-29

DOI: 10.5923/j.ijmc.20241402.03

770 Views   144 Downloads

Morphological Indicators of Self Organization of a Drop of Dehydrated Saliva at Various Vegetative Statuses and Health Levels

N. М. Gasanova, E. A. Ergashev

International Journal of Genetic Engineering , 2024, 12(4), pp. 39-47

DOI: 10.5923/j.ijge.20241204.01

696 Views   108 Downloads

Surgical Treatment of Degenerative Diseases of the Cervical Spine

Yuldashev Ravshan Muslimovich, Shukurov Xumoyuddin Asliddin O’g’li, Ruzimurodov Muhammad Faxritdinovich

American Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences , 2024, 14(5), pp. 1317-1320

DOI: 10.5923/j.ajmms.20241405.35

197 Views   95 Downloads

Extreme Rainfall in Madagascar Part I: Return Levels and Return Periods with Stationary and Non-Stationary Models

Justin Ratsaramody

Resources and Environment , 2024, 14(1), pp. 21-31

DOI: 10.5923/j.re.20241401.02

162 Views   99 Downloads

Most Cited Papers

A Review of Leadership Theories, Principles and Styles and Their Relevance to Educational Management

Rose Ngozi Amanchukwu, Gloria Jones Stanley, Nwachukwu Prince Ololube

Management , 2015, 5(1), pp. 6-14

DOI: 10.5923/j.mm.20150501.02

Internet of Things: Ubiquitous Home Control and Monitoring System using Android based Smart Phone

Rajeev Piyare

International Journal of Internet of Things , 2013, 2(1), pp. 5-11

DOI: 10.5923/j.ijit.20130201.02

Aqueous Two Phase Systems for the Recovery of Biomolecules – A Review

Selvaraj Raja, Vytla Ramachandra Murty, Varadavenkatesan Thivaharan, Vinayagam Rajasekar, Vinayagam Ramesh

Science and Technology , 2011, 1(1), pp. 7-16

DOI: 10.5923/j.scit.20110101.02

Latest Special Issue - Call for Papers

The following general guidelines may help you in preparing and editing the special issue and you can also check our current call for papers for special issues.

Please complete your proposal (see the template ) and send it to the Assistant Editor( [email protected] , [email protected] ).

Home   |   About Us   |   Terms and Conditions   |   Privacy Policy   |   Feedback   |   Sitemap   |   Contact Us

Copyright © 2011 - 2024 Scientific & Academic Publishing Co. All rights reserved.

• Biomedical & Life Sci.
• Business & Economics
• Chemistry & Materials Sci.
• Computer Sci. & Commun.
• Earth & Environmental Sci.
• Engineering
• Medicine & Healthcare
• Physics & Mathematics
• Social Sci. & Humanities

Books by Subjects  

• Biomedical & Life Sciences
• Chemistry & Materials Science
• Computer Science & Communications
• Earth & Environmental Sciences
• Social Sciences & Humanities
• For Librarians
• For Booksellers
• For Translation Rights
• Proceedings

• Journals A-Z

About SCIRP

• Publication Fees
• For Authors
• Peer-Review Issues
• Special Issues
• Manuscript Tracking System
• Subscription
• Translation & Proofreading
• Volume & Issue
• Open Access
• Publication Ethics
• Preservation
• Privacy Policy