how to conduct a systematic literature review article

Literature reviews establish the foundation of academic inquires. However, in the planning field, we lack rigorous systematic reviews. In this article, through a systematic search on the methodology of literature review, we categorize a typology of literature reviews, discuss steps in conducting a systematic literature review, and provide suggestions on how to enhance rigor in literature ...

Overview. A Systematic Literature Review (SLR) is a research methodology to collect, identify, and critically analyze the available research studies (e.g., articles, conference proceedings, books, dissertations) through a systematic procedure .An SLR updates the reader with current literature about a subject .The goal is to review critical points of current knowledge on a topic about research ...

The best reviews synthesize studies to draw broad theoretical conclusions about what a literature means, linking theory to evidence and evidence to theory. This guide describes how to plan, conduct, organize, and present a systematic review of quantitative (meta-analysis) or qualitative (narrative review, meta-synthesis) information.

Step 5: title and abstract screening. The process of a systematic review encompasses several steps, which include screening titles and abstracts and applying selection criteria. During the phase of title and abstract screening, a minimum of two reviewers independently evaluate the pertinence of each reference.

Systematic reviews: Structure, form and content. This article aims to provide an overview of the structure, form and content of systematic reviews. It focuses in particular on the literature searching component, and covers systematic database searching techniques, searching for grey literature and the importance of librarian involvement in the ...

Systematic reviews are characterized by a methodical and replicable methodology and presentation. They involve a comprehensive search to locate all relevant published and unpublished work on a subject; a systematic integration of search results; and a critique of the extent, nature, and quality of evidence in relation to a particular research question. The best reviews synthesize studies to ...

A preliminary review, which can often result in a full systematic review, to understand the available research literature, is usually time or scope limited. Complies evidence from multiple reviews and does not search for primary studies. 3. Identifying a topic and developing inclusion/exclusion criteria.

Screen the literature. Assess the quality of the studies. Extract the data. Analyze the results. Interpret and present the results. 1. Decide on your team. When carrying out a systematic literature review, you should employ multiple reviewers in order to minimize bias and strengthen analysis.

Image by TraceyChandler. Steps to conducting a systematic review. Quick overview of the process: Steps and resources from the UMB HSHSL Guide. YouTube video (26 min); Another detailed guide on how to conduct and write a systematic review from RMIT University; A roadmap for searching literature in PubMed from the VU Amsterdam; Alexander, P. A. (2020).

In this article, we detail methodological steps for how researchers can conduct systematic literature reviews and offer examples of bibliometric approaches to visualise results. The article is structured as follows. First, we provide a background information on the increasing interest in conducting systematic literature reviews.

A systematic review is a type of study that synthesises research that has been conducted on a particular topic. Systematic reviews are considered to provide the highest level of evidence on the hierarchy of evidence pyramid. Systematic reviews are conducted following rigorous research methodology. To minimise bias, systematic reviews utilise a ...

Detailed steps for conducting any systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched the methods reported in published SR/MA in tropical medicine and other healthcare fields besides the published guidelines like Cochrane guidelines {Higgins, 2011 #7} [] to collect the best low-bias method for each step of SR/MA conduction steps.Furthermore, we used guidelines that we apply in studies for all SR ...

A Step-by-Step Guide. ospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PAIntroductionA systematic review attempts to comprehensively and reproducibly collect, appraise, and synthesize all available empirical evidence that meets pre-d. fined criteria in order to answer a research question. The quantitative combination and statistical synthesis of the systema.

Method details Overview. A Systematic Literature Review (SLR) is a research methodology to collect, identify, and critically analyze the available research studies (e.g., articles, conference proceedings, books, dissertations) through a systematic procedure [12].An SLR updates the reader with current literature about a subject [6].The goal is to review critical points of current knowledge on a ...

Systematic reviews are used in healthcare to present a comprehensive, policy-neutral, transparent and reproducible synthesis of evidence. This article provides a practical overview of the process of undertaking systematic reviews, explaining the rationale for each stage. It provides guidance on the standard methods applicable to every ...

The application of systematic or structured literature reviews (SLRs) has developed into an established approach in the management domain (Kraus et al. 2020), with 90% of management-related SLRs published within the last 10 years (Clark et al. 2021).Such reviews help to condense knowledge in the field and point to future research directions, thereby enabling theory development (Fink 2010 ...

Reasons for inclusion and exclusion should be recorded. Step 3: Assessing the quality of studies. Study quality assessment is relevant to every step of a review. Question formulation (Step 1) and study selection criteria (Step 2) should describe the minimum acceptable level of design.

Systematic reviews are ranked very high in research and are considered the most valid form of medical evidence. They provide a complete summary of the current literature relevant to a research question and can be of immense use to medical professionals. Our goal with this paper is to conduct a narrative review of the literature about systematic reviews and outline the essential elements of a ...

The method used for conducting the current systematic literature review in quantum finance is PSALSAR developed by Mengist W., Soromessa T., and Legese G. in 2020. PSALSAR is a new method that uses 6 steps for conducting systematic literature reviews, there are two steps added to the usual method SALSA (Search, Appraisal, Synthesis, and Analysis).

Although several systematic reviews have been conducted on portions of the internalized weight stigma literature, no review to date has been conducted examining the entirety of the literature. Objective. The aim of this research was to conduct a systematic scoping review and synthesis of research on internalized weight stigma.

A systematic literature review has been carried out, identifying 42 articles with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), related to touch and haptic technologies and interaction between humans and social robots in the twenty years (2001 -2023).

This article provides a step-by-step approach to conducting and reporting systematic literature reviews (SLRs) in the domain of healthcare design and discusses some of the key quality issues associated with SLRs. SLR, as the name implies, is a systematic way of collecting, critically evaluating, integrating, and presenting findings from across ...

Our goal with this paper is to conduct a narrative review of the literature about systematic reviews and outline the essential elements of a systematic review along with the limitations of such a review. Keywords: systematic reviews, meta-analysis, narrative literature review, prisma checklist. A literature review provides an important insight ...

Background Growing numbers of randomized clinical trials-based systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRs/MAs) have been conducted to examine the effectiveness of acupuncture in treating gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). An overview of SRs/MAs will be conducted with the aim of systematically compiling, evaluating, and synthesizing the evidence regarding acupuncture for GERD. Methods SRs ...

Performing a literature review is a critical first step in research to understanding the state-of-the-art and identifying gaps and challenges in the field. A systematic literature review is a method which sets out a series of steps to methodically organize the review. In this paper, we present a guide designed for researchers and in particular early-stage researchers in the computer-science ...

Therefore, given the abundance of existing literature and the rise of controversial invasive fat reduction methods that primarily target SAT, the aim of the present study was to conduct a systematic review of the available literature which investigated the association between the abdominal ratio of VAT-to-SAT and the risk of CVDs.

Studies included in the present review were obtained through a systematic review of the literature on risk and threat assessment instruments for violent extremism. Before reviewing the literature, inclusion criteria had to be formulated by applying the following criteria: First, relevant articles had to be concerned with extremist individuals.

A systematic literature review is a method which sets out a series of steps to methodically organize the review. In this paper, we present a guide designed for researchers and in particular early-stage researchers in the computer-science field. The contribution of the article is the following:•Clearly defined strategies to follow for a ...

In this research paper, we conduct a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) that studies financial trading approaches through AI techniques. It reviews 143 research articles that implemented AI techniques in financial trading markets. Accordingly, it presents several findings and observations after reviewing the papers from the following ...

Choice of an appropriate tool for the evaluation of a systematic review first involves identification of the underlying construct to be assessed. For systematic reviews of interventions, recommended tools include AMSTAR-2 and ROBIS for appraisal of conduct and PRISMA 2020 for completeness of reporting.