submit your research paper

PRO Courses Guides New Tech Help Pro Expert Videos About wikiHow Pro Upgrade Sign In
EDIT Edit this Article
EXPLORE Tech Help Pro About Us Random Article Quizzes Request a New Article Community Dashboard This Or That Game Popular Categories Arts and Entertainment Artwork Books Movies Computers and Electronics Computers Phone Skills Technology Hacks Health Men's Health Mental Health Women's Health Relationships Dating Love Relationship Issues Hobbies and Crafts Crafts Drawing Games Education & Communication Communication Skills Personal Development Studying Personal Care and Style Fashion Hair Care Personal Hygiene Youth Personal Care School Stuff Dating All Categories Arts and Entertainment Finance and Business Home and Garden Relationship Quizzes Cars & Other Vehicles Food and Entertaining Personal Care and Style Sports and Fitness Computers and Electronics Health Pets and Animals Travel Education & Communication Hobbies and Crafts Philosophy and Religion Work World Family Life Holidays and Traditions Relationships Youth
Browse Articles
Learn Something New
Quizzes Hot
This Or That Game
Train Your Brain
Explore More
Support wikiHow
About wikiHow
Log in / Sign up
Education and Communications
College University and Postgraduate
Academic Writing
Research Papers

How to Write and Publish Your Research in a Journal

Last Updated: May 26, 2024 Fact Checked

Choosing a Journal

Writing the research paper, editing & revising your paper, submitting your paper, navigating the peer review process, research paper help.

This article was co-authored by Matthew Snipp, PhD and by wikiHow staff writer, Cheyenne Main . C. Matthew Snipp is the Burnet C. and Mildred Finley Wohlford Professor of Humanities and Sciences in the Department of Sociology at Stanford University. He is also the Director for the Institute for Research in the Social Science’s Secure Data Center. He has been a Research Fellow at the U.S. Bureau of the Census and a Fellow at the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences. He has published 3 books and over 70 articles and book chapters on demography, economic development, poverty and unemployment. He is also currently serving on the National Institute of Child Health and Development’s Population Science Subcommittee. He holds a Ph.D. in Sociology from the University of Wisconsin—Madison. There are 13 references cited in this article, which can be found at the bottom of the page. This article has been fact-checked, ensuring the accuracy of any cited facts and confirming the authority of its sources. This article has been viewed 701,081 times.

Publishing a research paper in a peer-reviewed journal allows you to network with other scholars, get your name and work into circulation, and further refine your ideas and research. Before submitting your paper, make sure it reflects all the work you’ve done and have several people read over it and make comments. Keep reading to learn how you can choose a journal, prepare your work for publication, submit it, and revise it after you get a response back.

Things You Should Know

Create a list of journals you’d like to publish your work in and choose one that best aligns with your topic and your desired audience.
Prepare your manuscript using the journal’s requirements and ask at least 2 professors or supervisors to review your paper.
Write a cover letter that “sells” your manuscript, says how your research adds to your field and explains why you chose the specific journal you’re submitting to.

Step 1 Create a list of journals you’d like to publish your work in.

Ask your professors or supervisors for well-respected journals that they’ve had good experiences publishing with and that they read regularly.
Many journals also only accept specific formats, so by choosing a journal before you start, you can write your article to their specifications and increase your chances of being accepted.
If you’ve already written a paper you’d like to publish, consider whether your research directly relates to a hot topic or area of research in the journals you’re looking into.

Step 2 Look at each journal’s audience, exposure, policies, and procedures.

Review the journal’s peer review policies and submission process to see if you’re comfortable creating or adjusting your work according to their standards.
Open-access journals can increase your readership because anyone can access them.

Step 1 Craft an effective introduction with a thesis statement.

Scientific research papers: Instead of a “thesis,” you might write a “research objective” instead. This is where you state the purpose of your research.
“This paper explores how George Washington’s experiences as a young officer may have shaped his views during difficult circumstances as a commanding officer.”
“This paper contends that George Washington’s experiences as a young officer on the 1750s Pennsylvania frontier directly impacted his relationship with his Continental Army troops during the harsh winter at Valley Forge.”

Step 2 Write the literature review and the body of your paper.

Scientific research papers: Include a “materials and methods” section with the step-by-step process you followed and the materials you used. [5] X Research source
Read other research papers in your field to see how they’re written. Their format, writing style, subject matter, and vocabulary can help guide your own paper. [6] X Research source

Step 3 Write your conclusion that ties back to your thesis or research objective.

If you’re writing about George Washington’s experiences as a young officer, you might emphasize how this research changes our perspective of the first president of the U.S.
Link this section to your thesis or research objective.
If you’re writing a paper about ADHD, you might discuss other applications for your research.

Step 4 Write an abstract that describes what your paper is about.

Scientific research papers: You might include your research and/or analytical methods, your main findings or results, and the significance or implications of your research.
Try to get as many people as you can to read over your abstract and provide feedback before you submit your paper to a journal.

Step 1 Prepare your manuscript according to the journal’s requirements.

They might also provide templates to help you structure your manuscript according to their specific guidelines. [11] X Research source

Step 2 Ask 2 colleagues to review your paper and revise it with their notes.

Not all journal reviewers will be experts on your specific topic, so a non-expert “outsider’s perspective” can be valuable.

Step 1 Check your sources for plagiarism and identify 5 to 6 keywords.

If you have a paper on the purification of wastewater with fungi, you might use both the words “fungi” and “mushrooms.”
Use software like iThenticate, Turnitin, or PlagScan to check for similarities between the submitted article and published material available online. [15] X Research source

Step 2 Write a cover letter explaining why you chose their journal.

Header: Address the editor who will be reviewing your manuscript by their name, include the date of submission, and the journal you are submitting to.
First paragraph: Include the title of your manuscript, the type of paper it is (like review, research, or case study), and the research question you wanted to answer and why.
Second paragraph: Explain what was done in your research, your main findings, and why they are significant to your field.
Third paragraph: Explain why the journal’s readers would be interested in your work and why your results are important to your field.
Conclusion: State the author(s) and any journal requirements that your work complies with (like ethical standards”).
“We confirm that this manuscript has not been published elsewhere and is not under consideration by another journal.”
“All authors have approved the manuscript and agree with its submission to [insert the name of the target journal].”

Step 3 Submit your article according to the journal’s submission guidelines.

Submit your article to only one journal at a time.
When submitting online, use your university email account. This connects you with a scholarly institution, which can add credibility to your work.

Step 1 Try not to panic when you get the journal’s initial response.

Accept: Only minor adjustments are needed, based on the provided feedback by the reviewers. A first submission will rarely be accepted without any changes needed.
Revise and Resubmit: Changes are needed before publication can be considered, but the journal is still very interested in your work.
Reject and Resubmit: Extensive revisions are needed. Your work may not be acceptable for this journal, but they might also accept it if significant changes are made.
Reject: The paper isn’t and won’t be suitable for this publication, but that doesn’t mean it might not work for another journal.

Step 2 Revise your paper based on the reviewers’ feedback.

Try organizing the reviewer comments by how easy it is to address them. That way, you can break your revisions down into more manageable parts.
If you disagree with a comment made by a reviewer, try to provide an evidence-based explanation when you resubmit your paper.

Step 3 Resubmit to the same journal or choose another from your list.

If you’re resubmitting your paper to the same journal, include a point-by-point response paper that talks about how you addressed all of the reviewers’ comments in your revision. [22] X Research source
If you’re not sure which journal to submit to next, you might be able to ask the journal editor which publications they recommend.

Expert Q&A

About This Article

To publish a research paper, ask a colleague or professor to review your paper and give you feedback. Once you've revised your work, familiarize yourself with different academic journals so that you can choose the publication that best suits your paper. Make sure to look at the "Author's Guide" so you can format your paper according to the guidelines for that publication. Then, submit your paper and don't get discouraged if it is not accepted right away. You may need to revise your paper and try again. To learn about the different responses you might get from journals, see our reviewer's explanation below. Did this summary help you? Yes No

Send fan mail to authors

Reader Success Stories

RAMDEV GOHIL

Oct 16, 2017

Did this article help you?

David Okandeji

Oct 23, 2019

Revati Joshi

Feb 13, 2017

Shahzad Khan

Jul 1, 2017

Apr 7, 2017

Featured Articles

Watch Articles

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Do Not Sell or Share My Info
Not Selling Info

wikiHow Tech Help Pro:

Develop the tech skills you need for work and life

Search Search
CN (Chinese)
DE (German)
ES (Spanish)
FR (Français)
JP (Japanese)
Open Research
Booksellers
Peer Reviewers
Springer Nature Group ↗

Publish an article

Roles and responsibilities
Signing your contract
Writing your manuscript
Submitting your manuscript
Producing your book
Promoting your book
Submit your book idea
Manuscript guidelines
Book author services
Publish a book
Publish conference proceedings

Join thousands of researchers worldwide that have published their work in one of our 3,000+ Springer Nature journals.

Step-by-step guide to article publishing

1. Prepare your article

Make sure you follow the submission guidelines for that journal. Search for a journal .
Get permission to use any images.
Check that your data is easy to reproduce.
State clearly if you're reusing any data that has been used elsewhere.
Follow our policies on plagiarism and ethics .
Use our services to get help with English translation, scientific assessment and formatting. Find out what support you can get .

2. Write a cover letter

Introduce your work in a 1-page letter, explaining the research you did, and why it's relevant.

3. Submit your manuscript

Go to the journal homepage to start the process
You can only submit 1 article at a time to each journal. Duplicate submissions will be rejected.

4. Technical check

We'll make sure that your article follows the journal guidelines for formatting, ethics, plagiarism, contributors, and permissions.

5. Editor and peer review

The journal editor will read your article and decide if it's ready for peer review.
Most articles will be reviewed by 2 or more experts in the field.
They may contact you with questions at this point.

6. Final decision

If your article is accepted, you'll need to sign a publishing agreement.
If your article is rejected, you can get help finding another journal from our transfer desk team .
If your article is open access, you'll need to pay a fee.
Fees for OA publishing differ across journals. See relevant journal page for more information.
You may be able to get help covering that cost. See information on funding .
We'll send you proofs to approve, then we'll publish your article.
Track your impact by logging in to your account

Get tips on preparing your manuscript using our submission checklist .

Each publication follows a slightly different process, so check the journal's guidelines for more details

Open access vs subscription publishing

Each of our journals has its own policies, options, and fees for publishing.

Over 600 of our journals are fully open access. Others use a hybrid model, with readers paying to access some articles.

Publishing your article open access has a number of benefits:

Free to access and download
Reaches a wider global audience
1.6x more citations
6x more downloads
4.9 average Altmetric attention (vs 2.1 subscription)

It's free to publish your article in a subscription journal, but there are fees for publishing open access articles. You'll need to check the open access fees for the journal you choose.

Learn more about open access

Get help with funding.

Many organisations require you to publish your research open access. It's worth checking with your supervisor and colleagues to understand your organisation's approach.

Many funders and institutions will cover your open access publishing fees. To find out if your fees are covered, take a look at our funding agreements .

We also offer discounts for researchers in some geographical regions. See regions with reduced fees

Learn more about funding

Choose a journal.

We have 3,000+ journals to choose from, covering a wide range of topics. The best way to find a relevant journal is to search by keyword.

Once you've chosen a journal, check the submission guidelines to see the open access fees.

Search all journals

Get support.

We offer editing, translation, data presentation and formatting services to help you at each step.

Author support for publishing

Knowledge resources for scientists, author tutorials.

If you have a question about a specific journal, check the submission guidelines. If you still need help, contact us .

Tools & Services
Account Development
Sales and account contacts
Professional
Press office
Locations & Contact

We are a world leading research, educational and professional publisher. Visit our main website for more information.

© 2024 Springer Nature
General terms and conditions
Your US State Privacy Rights
Your Privacy Choices / Manage Cookies
Accessibility
Legal notice
Help us to improve this site, send feedback.

How to Write and Publish a Research Paper for a Peer-Reviewed Journal

Open access
Published: 30 April 2020
Volume 36 , pages 909–913, ( 2021 )

Cite this article

You have full access to this open access article

Clara Busse ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-0178-1000 1 &
Ella August ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-5151-1036 1 , 2

274k Accesses

15 Citations

719 Altmetric

Explore all metrics

Communicating research findings is an essential step in the research process. Often, peer-reviewed journals are the forum for such communication, yet many researchers are never taught how to write a publishable scientific paper. In this article, we explain the basic structure of a scientific paper and describe the information that should be included in each section. We also identify common pitfalls for each section and recommend strategies to avoid them. Further, we give advice about target journal selection and authorship. In the online resource 1 , we provide an example of a high-quality scientific paper, with annotations identifying the elements we describe in this article.

How to Choose the Right Journal

The Point Is…to Publish?

Writing and publishing a scientific paper

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Introduction

Writing a scientific paper is an important component of the research process, yet researchers often receive little formal training in scientific writing. This is especially true in low-resource settings. In this article, we explain why choosing a target journal is important, give advice about authorship, provide a basic structure for writing each section of a scientific paper, and describe common pitfalls and recommendations for each section. In the online resource 1 , we also include an annotated journal article that identifies the key elements and writing approaches that we detail here. Before you begin your research, make sure you have ethical clearance from all relevant ethical review boards.

Select a Target Journal Early in the Writing Process

We recommend that you select a “target journal” early in the writing process; a “target journal” is the journal to which you plan to submit your paper. Each journal has a set of core readers and you should tailor your writing to this readership. For example, if you plan to submit a manuscript about vaping during pregnancy to a pregnancy-focused journal, you will need to explain what vaping is because readers of this journal may not have a background in this topic. However, if you were to submit that same article to a tobacco journal, you would not need to provide as much background information about vaping.

Information about a journal’s core readership can be found on its website, usually in a section called “About this journal” or something similar. For example, the Journal of Cancer Education presents such information on the “Aims and Scope” page of its website, which can be found here: https://www.springer.com/journal/13187/aims-and-scope .

Peer reviewer guidelines from your target journal are an additional resource that can help you tailor your writing to the journal and provide additional advice about crafting an effective article [ 1 ]. These are not always available, but it is worth a quick web search to find out.

Identify Author Roles Early in the Process

Early in the writing process, identify authors, determine the order of authors, and discuss the responsibilities of each author. Standard author responsibilities have been identified by The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) [ 2 ]. To set clear expectations about each team member’s responsibilities and prevent errors in communication, we also suggest outlining more detailed roles, such as who will draft each section of the manuscript, write the abstract, submit the paper electronically, serve as corresponding author, and write the cover letter. It is best to formalize this agreement in writing after discussing it, circulating the document to the author team for approval. We suggest creating a title page on which all authors are listed in the agreed-upon order. It may be necessary to adjust authorship roles and order during the development of the paper. If a new author order is agreed upon, be sure to update the title page in the manuscript draft.

In the case where multiple papers will result from a single study, authors should discuss who will author each paper. Additionally, authors should agree on a deadline for each paper and the lead author should take responsibility for producing an initial draft by this deadline.

Structure of the Introduction Section

The introduction section should be approximately three to five paragraphs in length. Look at examples from your target journal to decide the appropriate length. This section should include the elements shown in Fig. 1 . Begin with a general context, narrowing to the specific focus of the paper. Include five main elements: why your research is important, what is already known about the topic, the “gap” or what is not yet known about the topic, why it is important to learn the new information that your research adds, and the specific research aim(s) that your paper addresses. Your research aim should address the gap you identified. Be sure to add enough background information to enable readers to understand your study. Table 1 provides common introduction section pitfalls and recommendations for addressing them.

The main elements of the introduction section of an original research article. Often, the elements overlap

Methods Section

The purpose of the methods section is twofold: to explain how the study was done in enough detail to enable its replication and to provide enough contextual detail to enable readers to understand and interpret the results. In general, the essential elements of a methods section are the following: a description of the setting and participants, the study design and timing, the recruitment and sampling, the data collection process, the dataset, the dependent and independent variables, the covariates, the analytic approach for each research objective, and the ethical approval. The hallmark of an exemplary methods section is the justification of why each method was used. Table 2 provides common methods section pitfalls and recommendations for addressing them.

Results Section

The focus of the results section should be associations, or lack thereof, rather than statistical tests. Two considerations should guide your writing here. First, the results should present answers to each part of the research aim. Second, return to the methods section to ensure that the analysis and variables for each result have been explained.

Begin the results section by describing the number of participants in the final sample and details such as the number who were approached to participate, the proportion who were eligible and who enrolled, and the number of participants who dropped out. The next part of the results should describe the participant characteristics. After that, you may organize your results by the aim or by putting the most exciting results first. Do not forget to report your non-significant associations. These are still findings.

Tables and figures capture the reader’s attention and efficiently communicate your main findings [ 3 ]. Each table and figure should have a clear message and should complement, rather than repeat, the text. Tables and figures should communicate all salient details necessary for a reader to understand the findings without consulting the text. Include information on comparisons and tests, as well as information about the sample and timing of the study in the title, legend, or in a footnote. Note that figures are often more visually interesting than tables, so if it is feasible to make a figure, make a figure. To avoid confusing the reader, either avoid abbreviations in tables and figures, or define them in a footnote. Note that there should not be citations in the results section and you should not interpret results here. Table 3 provides common results section pitfalls and recommendations for addressing them.

Discussion Section

Opposite the introduction section, the discussion should take the form of a right-side-up triangle beginning with interpretation of your results and moving to general implications (Fig. 2 ). This section typically begins with a restatement of the main findings, which can usually be accomplished with a few carefully-crafted sentences.

Major elements of the discussion section of an original research article. Often, the elements overlap

Next, interpret the meaning or explain the significance of your results, lifting the reader’s gaze from the study’s specific findings to more general applications. Then, compare these study findings with other research. Are these findings in agreement or disagreement with those from other studies? Does this study impart additional nuance to well-accepted theories? Situate your findings within the broader context of scientific literature, then explain the pathways or mechanisms that might give rise to, or explain, the results.

Journals vary in their approach to strengths and limitations sections: some are embedded paragraphs within the discussion section, while some mandate separate section headings. Keep in mind that every study has strengths and limitations. Candidly reporting yours helps readers to correctly interpret your research findings.

The next element of the discussion is a summary of the potential impacts and applications of the research. Should these results be used to optimally design an intervention? Does the work have implications for clinical protocols or public policy? These considerations will help the reader to further grasp the possible impacts of the presented work.

Finally, the discussion should conclude with specific suggestions for future work. Here, you have an opportunity to illuminate specific gaps in the literature that compel further study. Avoid the phrase “future research is necessary” because the recommendation is too general to be helpful to readers. Instead, provide substantive and specific recommendations for future studies. Table 4 provides common discussion section pitfalls and recommendations for addressing them.

Follow the Journal’s Author Guidelines

After you select a target journal, identify the journal’s author guidelines to guide the formatting of your manuscript and references. Author guidelines will often (but not always) include instructions for titles, cover letters, and other components of a manuscript submission. Read the guidelines carefully. If you do not follow the guidelines, your article will be sent back to you.

Finally, do not submit your paper to more than one journal at a time. Even if this is not explicitly stated in the author guidelines of your target journal, it is considered inappropriate and unprofessional.

Your title should invite readers to continue reading beyond the first page [ 4 , 5 ]. It should be informative and interesting. Consider describing the independent and dependent variables, the population and setting, the study design, the timing, and even the main result in your title. Because the focus of the paper can change as you write and revise, we recommend you wait until you have finished writing your paper before composing the title.

Be sure that the title is useful for potential readers searching for your topic. The keywords you select should complement those in your title to maximize the likelihood that a researcher will find your paper through a database search. Avoid using abbreviations in your title unless they are very well known, such as SNP, because it is more likely that someone will use a complete word rather than an abbreviation as a search term to help readers find your paper.

After you have written a complete draft, use the checklist (Fig. 3 ) below to guide your revisions and editing. Additional resources are available on writing the abstract and citing references [ 5 ]. When you feel that your work is ready, ask a trusted colleague or two to read the work and provide informal feedback. The box below provides a checklist that summarizes the key points offered in this article.

Checklist for manuscript quality

Data Availability

Michalek AM (2014) Down the rabbit hole…advice to reviewers. J Cancer Educ 29:4–5

Article Google Scholar

International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Defining the role of authors and contributors: who is an author? http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/defining-the-role-of-authosrs-and-contributors.html . Accessed 15 January, 2020

Vetto JT (2014) Short and sweet: a short course on concise medical writing. J Cancer Educ 29(1):194–195

Brett M, Kording K (2017) Ten simple rules for structuring papers. PLoS ComputBiol. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005619

Lang TA (2017) Writing a better research article. J Public Health Emerg. https://doi.org/10.21037/jphe.2017.11.06

Download references

Acknowledgments

Ella August is grateful to the Sustainable Sciences Institute for mentoring her in training researchers on writing and publishing their research.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Maternal and Child Health, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, 135 Dauer Dr, 27599, Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Clara Busse & Ella August

Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-2029, USA

Ella August

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ella August .

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interests.

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

(PDF 362 kb)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Busse, C., August, E. How to Write and Publish a Research Paper for a Peer-Reviewed Journal. J Canc Educ 36 , 909–913 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-020-01751-z

Download citation

Published : 30 April 2020

Issue Date : October 2021

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-020-01751-z

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Manuscripts
Scientific writing
Find a journal
Publish with us
Track your research

You are using an outdated browser . Please upgrade your browser today !

How to Write and Publish a Research Paper in 7 Steps

What comes next after you're done with your research? Publishing the results in a journal of course! We tell you how to present your work in the best way possible.

This post is part of a series, which serves to provide hands-on information and resources for authors and editors.

Things have gotten busy in scholarly publishing: These days, a new article gets published in the 50,000 most important peer-reviewed journals every few seconds, while each one takes on average 40 minutes to read. Hundreds of thousands of papers reach the desks of editors and reviewers worldwide each year and 50% of all submissions end up rejected at some stage.

In a nutshell: there is a lot of competition, and the people who decide upon the fate of your manuscript are short on time and overworked. But there are ways to make their lives a little easier and improve your own chances of getting your work published!

Well, it may seem obvious, but before submitting an academic paper, always make sure that it is an excellent reflection of the research you have done and that you present it in the most professional way possible. Incomplete or poorly presented manuscripts can create a great deal of frustration and annoyance for editors who probably won’t even bother wasting the time of the reviewers!

This post will discuss 7 steps to the successful publication of your research paper:

Check whether your research is publication-ready
Choose an article type
Choose a journal
Construct your paper
Decide the order of authors
Check and double-check
Submit your paper

1. Check Whether Your Research Is Publication-Ready

Should you publish your research at all?

If your work holds academic value – of course – a well-written scholarly article could open doors to your research community. However, if you are not yet sure, whether your research is ready for publication, here are some key questions to ask yourself depending on your field of expertise:

Have you done or found something new and interesting? Something unique?
Is the work directly related to a current hot topic?
Have you checked the latest results or research in the field?
Have you provided solutions to any difficult problems?
Have the findings been verified?
Have the appropriate controls been performed if required?
Are your findings comprehensive?

If the answers to all relevant questions are “yes”, you need to prepare a good, strong manuscript. Remember, a research paper is only useful if it is clearly understood, reproducible and if it is read and used .

2. Choose An Article Type

The first step is to determine which type of paper is most appropriate for your work and what you want to achieve. The following list contains the most important, usually peer-reviewed article types in the natural sciences:

Full original research papers disseminate completed research findings. On average this type of paper is 8-10 pages long, contains five figures, and 25-30 references. Full original research papers are an important part of the process when developing your career.

Review papers present a critical synthesis of a specific research topic. These papers are usually much longer than original papers and will contain numerous references. More often than not, they will be commissioned by journal editors. Reviews present an excellent way to solidify your research career.

Letters, Rapid or Short Communications are often published for the quick and early communication of significant and original advances. They are much shorter than full articles and usually limited in length by the journal. Journals specifically dedicated to short communications or letters are also published in some fields. In these the authors can present short preliminary findings before developing a full-length paper.

3. Choose a Journal

Are you looking for the right place to publish your paper? Find out here whether a De Gruyter journal might be the right fit.

Submit to journals that you already read, that you have a good feel for. If you do so, you will have a better appreciation of both its culture and the requirements of the editors and reviewers.

Other factors to consider are:

The specific subject area
The aims and scope of the journal
The type of manuscript you have written
The significance of your work
The reputation of the journal
The reputation of the editors within the community
The editorial/review and production speeds of the journal
The community served by the journal
The coverage and distribution
The accessibility ( open access vs. closed access)

4. Construct Your Paper

Each element of a paper has its purpose, so you should make these sections easy to index and search.

Don’t forget that requirements can differ highly per publication, so always make sure to apply a journal’s specific instructions – or guide – for authors to your manuscript, even to the first draft (text layout, paper citation, nomenclature, figures and table, etc.) It will save you time, and the editor’s.

Also, even in these days of Internet-based publishing, space is still at a premium, so be as concise as possible. As a good journalist would say: “Never use three words when one will do!”

Let’s look at the typical structure of a full research paper, but bear in mind certain subject disciplines may have their own specific requirements so check the instructions for authors on the journal’s home page.

4.1 The Title

It’s important to use the title to tell the reader what your paper is all about! You want to attract their attention, a bit like a newspaper headline does. Be specific and to the point. Keep it informative and concise, and avoid jargon and abbreviations (unless they are universally recognized like DNA, for example).

4.2 The Abstract

This could be termed as the “advertisement” for your article. Make it interesting and easily understood without the reader having to read the whole article. Be accurate and specific, and keep it as brief and concise as possible. Some journals (particularly in the medical fields) will ask you to structure the abstract in distinct, labeled sections, which makes it even more accessible.

A clear abstract will influence whether or not your work is considered and whether an editor should invest more time on it or send it for review.

4.3 Keywords

Keywords are used by abstracting and indexing services, such as PubMed and Web of Science. They are the labels of your manuscript, which make it “searchable” online by other researchers.

Include words or phrases (usually 4-8) that are closely related to your topic but not “too niche” for anyone to find them. Make sure to only use established abbreviations. Think about what scientific terms and its variations your potential readers are likely to use and search for. You can also do a test run of your selected keywords in one of the common academic search engines. Do similar articles to your own appear? Yes? Then that’s a good sign.

4.4 Introduction

This first part of the main text should introduce the problem, as well as any existing solutions you are aware of and the main limitations. Also, state what you hope to achieve with your research.

Do not confuse the introduction with the results, discussion or conclusion.

4.5 Methods

Every research article should include a detailed Methods section (also referred to as “Materials and Methods”) to provide the reader with enough information to be able to judge whether the study is valid and reproducible.

Include detailed information so that a knowledgeable reader can reproduce the experiment. However, use references and supplementary materials to indicate previously published procedures.

4.6 Results

In this section, you will present the essential or primary results of your study. To display them in a comprehensible way, you should use subheadings as well as illustrations such as figures, graphs, tables and photos, as appropriate.

4.7 Discussion

Here you should tell your readers what the results mean .

Do state how the results relate to the study’s aims and hypotheses and how the findings relate to those of other studies. Explain all possible interpretations of your findings and the study’s limitations.

Do not make “grand statements” that are not supported by the data. Also, do not introduce any new results or terms. Moreover, do not ignore work that conflicts or disagrees with your findings. Instead …

Be brave! Address conflicting study results and convince the reader you are the one who is correct.

4.8 Conclusion

Your conclusion isn’t just a summary of what you’ve already written. It should take your paper one step further and answer any unresolved questions.

Sum up what you have shown in your study and indicate possible applications and extensions. The main question your conclusion should answer is: What do my results mean for the research field and my community?

4.9 Acknowledgments and Ethical Statements

It is extremely important to acknowledge anyone who has helped you with your paper, including researchers who supplied materials or reagents (e.g. vectors or antibodies); and anyone who helped with the writing or English, or offered critical comments about the content.

Learn more about academic integrity in our blog post “Scholarly Publication Ethics: 4 Common Mistakes You Want To Avoid” .

Remember to state why people have been acknowledged and ask their permission . Ensure that you acknowledge sources of funding, including any grant or reference numbers.

Furthermore, if you have worked with animals or humans, you need to include information about the ethical approval of your study and, if applicable, whether informed consent was given. Also, state whether you have any competing interests regarding the study (e.g. because of financial or personal relationships.)

4.10 References

The end is in sight, but don’t relax just yet!

De facto, there are often more mistakes in the references than in any other part of the manuscript. It is also one of the most annoying and time-consuming problems for editors.

Remember to cite the main scientific publications on which your work is based. But do not inflate the manuscript with too many references. Avoid excessive – and especially unnecessary – self-citations. Also, avoid excessive citations of publications from the same institute or region.

5. Decide the Order of Authors

In the sciences, the most common way to order the names of the authors is by relative contribution.

Generally, the first author conducts and/or supervises the data analysis and the proper presentation and interpretation of the results. They put the paper together and usually submit the paper to the journal.

Co-authors make intellectual contributions to the data analysis and contribute to data interpretation. They review each paper draft. All of them must be able to present the paper and its results, as well as to defend the implications and discuss study limitations.

Do not leave out authors who should be included or add “gift authors”, i.e. authors who did not contribute significantly.

6. Check and Double-Check

As a final step before submission, ask colleagues to read your work and be constructively critical .

Make sure that the paper is appropriate for the journal – take a last look at their aims and scope. Check if all of the requirements in the instructions for authors are met.

Ensure that the cited literature is balanced. Are the aims, purpose and significance of the results clear?

Conduct a final check for language, either by a native English speaker or an editing service.

7. Submit Your Paper

When you and your co-authors have double-, triple-, quadruple-checked the manuscript: submit it via e-mail or online submission system. Along with your manuscript, submit a cover letter, which highlights the reasons why your paper would appeal to the journal and which ensures that you have received approval of all authors for submission.

It is up to the editors and the peer-reviewers now to provide you with their (ideally constructive and helpful) comments and feedback. Time to take a breather!

If the paper gets rejected, do not despair – it happens to literally everybody. If the journal suggests major or minor revisions, take the chance to provide a thorough response and make improvements as you see fit. If the paper gets accepted, congrats!

It’s now time to get writing and share your hard work – good luck!

If you are interested, check out this related blog post

[Title Image by Nick Morrison via Unsplash]

David Sleeman

David Sleeman worked as Senior Journals Manager in the field of Physical Sciences at De Gruyter.

You might also be interested in

Academia & Publishing

Library Community Gives Back: 2023 Webinar Speakers’ Charity Picks

From error to excellence: embracing mistakes in library practice, the impact of transformative agreements on scholarly publishing, visit our shop.

De Gruyter publishes over 1,300 new book titles each year and more than 750 journals in the humanities, social sciences, medicine, mathematics, engineering, computer sciences, natural sciences, and law.

Pin It on Pinterest

Home → Get Published → How to Publish a Research Paper: A Step-by-Step Guide

How to Publish a Research Paper: A Step-by-Step Guide

Jordan Kruszynski

January 4, 2024

You’re in academia.

You’re going steady.

Your research is going well and you begin to wonder: ‘ How exactly do I get a research paper published?’

If this is the question on your lips, then this step-by-step guide is the one for you. We’ll be walking you through the whole process of how to publish a research paper.

Publishing a research paper is a significant milestone for researchers and academics, as it allows you to share your findings, contribute to your field of study, and start to gain serious recognition within the wider academic community. So, want to know how to publish a research paper? By following our guide, you’ll get a firm grasp of the steps involved in this process, giving you the best chance of successfully navigating the publishing process and getting your work out there.

Understanding the Publishing Process

To begin, it’s crucial to understand that getting a research paper published is a multi-step process. From beginning to end, it could take as little as 2 months before you see your paper nestled in the pages of your chosen journal. On the other hand, it could take as long as a year .

Below, we set out the steps before going into more detail on each one. Getting a feel for these steps will help you to visualise what lies ahead, and prepare yourself for each of them in turn. It’s important to remember that you won’t actually have control over every step – in fact, some of them will be decided by people you’ll probably never meet. However, knowing which parts of the process are yours to decide will allow you to adjust your approach and attitude accordingly.

Each of the following stages will play a vital role in the eventual publication of your paper:

Preparing Your Research Paper
Finding the Right Journal
Crafting a Strong Manuscript
Navigating the Peer-Review Process
Submitting Your Paper
Dealing with Rejections and Revising Your Paper

Step 1: Preparing Your Research Paper

It all starts here. The quality and content of your research paper is of fundamental importance if you want to get it published. This step will be different for every researcher depending on the nature of your research, but if you haven’t yet settled on a topic, then consider the following advice:

Choose an interesting and relevant topic that aligns with current trends in your field. If your research touches on the passions and concerns of your academic peers or wider society, it may be more likely to capture attention and get published successfully.
Conduct a comprehensive literature review (link to lit. review article once it’s published) to identify the state of existing research and any knowledge gaps within it. Aiming to fill a clear gap in the knowledge of your field is a great way to increase the practicality of your research and improve its chances of getting published.
Structure your paper in a clear and organised manner, including all the necessary sections such as title, abstract, introduction (link to the ‘how to write a research paper intro’ article once it’s published) , methodology, results, discussion, and conclusion.
Adhere to the formatting guidelines provided by your target journal to ensure that your paper is accepted as viable for publishing. More on this in the next section…

Step 2: Finding the Right Journal

Understanding how to publish a research paper involves selecting the appropriate journal for your work. This step is critical for successful publication, and you should take several factors into account when deciding which journal to apply for:

Conduct thorough research to identify journals that specialise in your field of study and have published similar research. Naturally, if you submit a piece of research in molecular genetics to a journal that specialises in geology, you won’t be likely to get very far.
Consider factors such as the journal’s scope, impact factor, and target audience. Today there is a wide array of journals to choose from, including traditional and respected print journals, as well as numerous online, open-access endeavours. Some, like Nature , even straddle both worlds.
Review the submission guidelines provided by the journal and ensure your paper meets all the formatting requirements and word limits. This step is key. Nature, for example, offers a highly informative series of pages that tells you everything you need to know in order to satisfy their formatting guidelines (plus more on the whole submission process).
Note that these guidelines can differ dramatically from journal to journal, and details really do matter. You might submit an outstanding piece of research, but if it includes, for example, images in the wrong size or format, this could mean a lengthy delay to getting it published. If you get everything right first time, you’ll save yourself a lot of time and trouble, as well as strengthen your publishing chances in the first place.

Step 3: Crafting a Strong Manuscript

Crafting a strong manuscript is crucial to impress journal editors and reviewers. Look at your paper as a complete package, and ensure that all the sections tie together to deliver your findings with clarity and precision.

Begin by creating a clear and concise title that accurately reflects the content of your paper.
Compose an informative abstract that summarises the purpose, methodology, results, and significance of your study.
Craft an engaging introduction (link to the research paper introduction article) that draws your reader in.
Develop a well-structured methodology section, presenting your results effectively using tables and figures.
Write a compelling discussion and conclusion that emphasise the significance of your findings.

Step 4: Navigating the Peer-Review Process

Once you submit your research paper to a journal, it undergoes a rigorous peer-review process to ensure its quality and validity. In peer-review, experts in your field assess your research and provide feedback and suggestions for improvement, ultimately determining whether your paper is eligible for publishing or not. You are likely to encounter several models of peer-review, based on which party – author, reviewer, or both – remains anonymous throughout the process.

When your paper undergoes the peer-review process, be prepared for constructive criticism and address the comments you receive from your reviewer thoughtfully, providing clear and concise responses to their concerns or suggestions. These could make all the difference when it comes to making your next submission.

The peer-review process can seem like a closed book at times. Check out our discussion of the issue with philosopher and academic Amna Whiston in The Research Beat podcast!

Step 5: Submitting Your Paper

As we’ve already pointed out, one of the key elements in how to publish a research paper is ensuring that you meticulously follow the journal’s submission guidelines. Strive to comply with all formatting requirements, including citation styles, font, margins, and reference structure.

Before the final submission, thoroughly proofread your paper for errors, including grammar, spelling, and any inconsistencies in your data or analysis. At this stage, consider seeking feedback from colleagues or mentors to further improve the quality of your paper.

Step 6: Dealing with Rejections and Revising Your Paper

Rejection is a common part of the publishing process, but it shouldn’t discourage you. Analyse reviewer comments objectively and focus on the constructive feedback provided. Make necessary revisions and improvements to your paper to address the concerns raised by reviewers. If needed, consider submitting your paper to a different journal that is a better fit for your research.

For more tips on how to publish your paper out there, check out this thread by Dr. Asad Naveed ( @dr_asadnaveed ) – and if you need a refresher on the basics of how to publish under the Open Access model, watch this 5-minute video from Audemic Academy !

Final Thoughts

Successfully understanding how to publish a research paper requires dedication, attention to detail, and a systematic approach. By following the advice in our guide, you can increase your chances of navigating the publishing process effectively and achieving your goal of publication.

Remember, the journey may involve revisions, peer feedback, and potential rejections, but each step is an opportunity for growth and improvement. Stay persistent, maintain a positive mindset, and continue to refine your research paper until it reaches the standards of your target journal. Your contribution to your wider discipline through published research will not only advance your career, but also add to the growing body of collective knowledge in your field. Embrace the challenges and rewards that come with the publication process, and may your research paper make a significant impact in your area of study!

Looking for inspiration for your next big paper? Head to Audemic , where you can organise and listen to all the best and latest research in your field!

Keep striving, researchers! ✨

Behind the Scenes: What Does a Research Assistant Do?

Have you ever wondered what goes on behind the scenes in a research lab? Does it involve acting out the whims of

How to Write a Research Paper Introduction: Hook, Line, and Sinker

Want to know how to write a research paper introduction that dazzles? Struggling to hook your reader in with your opening sentences?

Blog Podcast

Subscribe to our newsletter!

Discover more from Audemic: Access any academic research via audio

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Type your email…

Submit your paper

Publishing with Elsevier: step-by-step

Learn about the publication process and how to submit your manuscript. This tutorial will help you find the right journal and maximize the chance to be published.

1. Find a journal

Find out the journals that could be best suited for publishing your research. Match your manuscript using the JournalFinder tool, then learn more about each journal.

JournalFinder

Powered by the Elsevier Fingerprint Engine™, Elsevier JournalFinder uses smart search technology and field-of-research-specific vocabularies to match your article to Elsevier journals.

Find out more about a journal

Learn about each journal's topics, impact and submission policies.

Find a journal by name

Read the journal's aims and scope to make sure it is a match
Check whether you can submit – some journals are invitation only
Use journal metrics to understand the impact of a journal
If available, check the journal at Journal Insights for additional info about impact, speed and reach
If you're a postdoc, check out our postdoc free access program

2. Prepare your paper for submission

Download our get published quick guide , which outlines the essential steps in preparing a paper. (This is also available in Chinese ). It is very important that you stick to the specific "guide for authors" of the journal to which you are submitting. This can be found on the journal's home page.

You can find information about the publishing process in the understanding the publishing process guide. It covers topics such as authors' rights, ethics and plagiarism, and journal and article metrics.

If you have research data to share, make sure you read the guide for authors to find out which options the journal offers to share research data with your article.

3. Submit and revise

You can submit to most Elsevier journals using our online systems. The system you use will depend on the journal to which you submit. You can access the relevant submission system via the "submit your paper" link on the Elsevier.com journal homepage of your chosen journal.

Alternatively, if you have been invited to submit to a journal, follow the instructions provided to you.

Once submitted, your paper will be considered by the editor and if it passes initial screening, it will be sent for peer review by experts in your field. If deemed unsuitable for publication in your chosen journal, the editor may suggest you transfer your submission to a more suitable journal, via an article transfer service.

4. Track your paper

Track your submitted paper.

You can track the status of your submitted paper online. The system you use to track your submission will be the same system to which you submitted. Use the reference number you received after submission to track your submission.

Unsure about what the submission status means? Check out this video .

In case of any problems contact the Support Center

Track your accepted paper

Once your paper is accepted for publication, you will receive a reference number and a direct link that lets you follow its publication status via Elsevier’s "Track Your Accepted Article" service.

However, even without a notification you can track the status of your article by entering your article reference number and corresponding author surname in Track Your Accepted Article .

Read more about the article tracking service

5. Share and promote

Now that your article is published, you can promote it to achieve a bigger impact for your research. Sharing research, accomplishments and ambitions with a wider audience makes you more visible in your field. This helps you get cited more, enabling you to cultivate a stronger reputation, promote your research and move forward in your career.

Read more on sharing your research After publication, celebrate and get noticed!

Elsevier.com visitor survey

We are always looking for ways to improve customer experience on Elsevier.com. We would like to ask you for a moment of your time to fill in a short questionnaire, at the end of your visit . If you decide to participate, a new browser tab will open so you can complete the survey after you have completed your visit to this website. Thanks in advance for your time.

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

View all journals

How to publish your paper

On this page, journal specific instructions, nature journal pledge to authors, how to publish your research in a nature journal, editorial process, about advance online publication, journals' aop timetable, frequently asked questions.

For more information on how to publish papers in a specific Nature Portfolio title, please visit the author instructions page for the journal that is of interest to you.

Top of page ⤴

Editors of the Nature journals strive to provide authors with an outstandingly efficient, fair and thoughtful submission, peer-review and publishing experience. Authors can expect all manuscripts that are published to be scrutinized for peer-review with the utmost professional rigor and care by expert referees who are selected by the editors for their ability to provide incisive and useful analysis. Editors weigh many factors when choosing content for Nature journals, but they strive to minimize the time taken to make decisions about publication while maintaining the highest possible quality of that decision.

After review, editors work to increase a paper's readability, and thereby its audience, through advice and editing, so that all research is presented in a form that is both readable to those in the field and understandable to scientists outside the immediate discipline. Research is published online without delay through our Advance Online Publication system. Nature journals provide more than 3,000 registered journalists with weekly press releases that mention all research papers to be published. About 800,000 registered users receive e-mailed tables of contents, and many papers are highlighted for the nonspecialist reader on the journal's homepage, contents pages and in News and Views.

Throughout this process, the editors of Nature journals uphold editorial, ethical and scientific standards according to the policies outlined on the author and referee site as well as on our journal websites. We periodically review those policies to ensure that they continue to reflect the needs of the scientific community, and welcome comments and suggestions from scientists, either via the feedback links on the author and referees' website or via our author blog, Nautilus , or peer-review blog, Peer to Peer .

The Nature journals comprise the weekly, multidisciplinary Nature, which publishes research of the highest influence within a discipline that will be of interest to scientists in other fields, and fifteen monthly titles, publishing papers of the highest quality and of exceptional impact: Nature Biotechnology, Nature Cell Biology, Nature Chemical Biology, Nature Chemistry, Nature Climate Change, Nature Communications, Nature Genetics, Nature Geoscience, Nature Immunology, Nature Materials, Nature Medicine, Nature Methods, Nature Nanotechnology, Nature Neuroscience, Nature Photonics, Nature Physics, Nature Protocolsand Nature Structural and Molecular Biology. These journals are international, being published and printed in the United States, the United Kingdom and Japan. See here for more information about the relationship between these journals.

Nature and the Nature monthly journals have Impact Factors that are among the highest in the world. The high prestige of these journals brings many rewards to their authors, but also means that competition for publication is severe, so many submissions have to be declined without peer-review.

The Nature journals differ from most other journals in that they do not have editorial boards, but are instead run by professional editors who consult widely among the scientific community in making decisions about publication of papers. This article is to provide you with an overview of the general editorial processes of these unique journals. Although the journals are broadly similar and share editorial policies , all authors should consult the author information pages of the specific Nature journal before submitting, to obtain detailed information on criteria for publication and manuscript preparation for that journal, as some differences exist.

The following sections summarise the journals' editorial processes and describe how manuscripts are handled by editors between submission and publication. At all stages of the process, you can access the online submission system and find the status of your manuscript.

Presubmission enquiries

Many Nature journals allow researchers to obtain informal feedback from editors before submitting the whole manuscript. This service is intended to save you time — if the editors feel it would not be suitable, you can submit the manuscript to another journal without delay. If you wish to use the presubmission enquiry service, please use the online system of the journal of your choice to send a paragraph explaining the importance of your manuscript, as well as the abstract or summary paragraph with its associated citation list so the editors may judge the manuscript in relation to other related work. The editors will quickly either invite you to submit the whole manuscript (which does not mean any commitment to publication), or will say that it is not suitable for the journal. If you receive a negative response, please do not reply. If you are convinced of the importance of your manuscript despite editors' reservations, you may submit the whole manuscript using the journal's online submission system. The editors can then make a more complete assessment of your work. Note that not all Nature journals offer a presubmission enquiry service.

Initial submission

When you are ready to submit the manuscript, please use the online submission system for the journal concerned. When the journal receives your manuscript, it will be assigned a number and an editor, who reads the manuscript, seeks informal advice from scientific advisors and editorial colleagues, and compares your submission to other recently published papers in the field. If the manuscript seems novel and arresting, and the work described has both immediate and far-reaching implications, the editor will send it out for peer review, usually to two or three independent specialists. However, because the journals can publish only a few of the manuscripts in the field or subfield concerned, many manuscripts have to be declined without peer review even though they may describe solid scientific results.

Transfers between Nature journals

In some cases, an editor is unable to offer publication, but might suggest that the manuscript is more suitable for one of the other Nature journals. If you wish to resubmit your manuscript to the suggested journal, you can simply follow the link provided by the editor to transfer your manuscript and the reviewers' comments to the new journal. This process is entirely in your control: you can choose not to use this service and instead to submit your manuscript to any other Nature or nature research journal, with or without including the reviewers' comments if you wish, using the journal's usual online submission service. For more information, please see the manuscript transfers page .

Peer review

The corresponding author is notified by email when an editor decides to send a manuscript for review. The editors choose referees for their independence, ability to evaluate the technical aspects of the paper fully and fairly, whether they are currently or recently assessing related submissions, and whether they can review the manuscript within the short time requested.

You may suggest referees for your manuscript (including address details), so long as they are independent scientists. These suggestions are often helpful, although they are not always followed. Editors will honour your requests to exclude a limited number of named scientists as reviewers.

Decisions and revisions

If the editor invites you to revise your manuscript, you should include with your resubmitted version a new cover letter that includes a point-by-point response to the reviewers' and editors' comments, including an explanation of how you have altered your manuscript in response to these, and an estimation of the length of the revised version with figures/tables. The decision letter will specify a deadline, and revisions that are returned within this period will retain their original submission date.

Additional supplementary information is published with the online version of your article if the editors and referees have judged that it is essential for the conclusions of the article (for example, a large table of data or the derivation of a model) but of more specialist interest than the rest of the article. Editors encourage authors whose articles describe methods to provide a summary of the method for the print version and to include full details and protocols online. Authors are also encouraged to post the full protocol on Nature Protocols' Protocol Exchange , which as well as a protocols database provides an online forum for readers in the field to add comments, suggestions and refinements to the published protocols.

After acceptance

Your accepted manuscript is prepared for publication by copy editors (also called subeditors), who refine it so that the text and figures are readable and clear to those outside the immediate field; choose keywords to maximize visibility in online searches as well as suitable for indexing services; and ensure that the manuscripts conform to house style. The copy editors are happy to give advice to authors whose native language is not English, and will edit those papers with special care.

After publication

All articles are published in the print edition and, in PDF and HTML format, in the online edition of the journal, in full. Many linking and navigational services are provided with the online (HTML) version of all articles published by the Nature journals.

All articles and contact details of corresponding authors are included in our press release service, which means that your work is drawn to the attention of all the main media organizations in the world, who may choose to feature the work in newspaper and other media reports. Some articles are summarized and highlighted within Nature and Nature Portfolio publications and subject-specific websites.

Journals published by Nature Portfolio do not ask authors for copyright, but instead ask you to sign an exclusive publishing license . This allows you to archive the accepted version of your manuscript six months after publication on your own, your institution's, and your funder's websites.

Disagreements with decisions

If a journal's editors are unable to offer publication of a manuscript and have not invited resubmission, you are strongly advised to submit your manuscript for publication elsewhere. However, if you believe that the editors or reviewers have seriously misunderstood your manuscript, you may write to the editors, explaining the scientific reasons why you believe the decision was incorrect. Please bear in mind that editors prioritise newly submitted manuscripts and manuscripts where resubmission has been invited, so it can take several weeks before letters of disagreement can be answered. During this time, you must not submit your manuscript elsewhere. In the interests of publishing your results without unnecessary delay, we therefore advise you to submit your manuscript to another journal if it has been declined, rather than to spend time on corresponding further with the editors of the declining journal.

Nature journals offer Advance Online Publication (AOP).

We believe that AOP is the best and quickest way to publish high-quality, peer-reviewed research for the benefit of readers and authors. Papers published AOP are the definitive version: they do not change before appearing in print and can be referenced formally as soon as they appear on the journal's AOP website. In addition, Nature publishes some papers each week via an Accelerated Article Preview (AAP) workflow. For these papers, we upload the accepted manuscript to our website as an AAP PDF, without subediting of text, figures or tables, but with some preliminary formatting. AAP papers are clearly indicated by a watermark on each page of the online PDF.

Each journal's website includes an AOP table of contents, in which papers are listed in order of publication date (beginning with the most recent). Each paper carries a digital object identifier (DOI), which serves as a unique electronic identification tag for that paper. As soon as the issue containing the paper is printed, papers will be removed from the AOP table of contents, assigned a page number and transferred to that issue's table of contents on the website. The DOI remains attached to the paper to provide a persistent identifier.

Nature publishes many, but not all, papers AOP, on Mondays and Wednesdays.

For the monthly Nature journals publishing primary research, new articles are uploaded to the AOP section of their web sites once each week. Occasionally, an article may be uploaded on other days.

The monthly Nature Reviews journals also upload new articles to the AOP section of their web sites once each week.

Q. Which articles are published AOP?

A. Original research is published AOP — that is, Articles and Letters, and for the Nature journals that publish them, Brief Communications. Associated News and Views articles may be published with the AOP Article or Letter or when the papers are published in the print/online edition of the journal. Nature occasionally publishes other article types AOP, for example News and Commentaries.

Q. Is the AOP version of the article definitive?

A. Yes. Only the final version of the paper is published AOP, exactly as it will be published in the printed edition. The paper is thus complete in every respect except that instead of having a volume/issue/page number, it has a DOI (digital object identifier). This means that the paper can be referenced as soon as it appears on the AOP site by using the DOI. Nature also publishes some papers each week via an Accelerated Article Preview workflow, where the accepted version of the paper is uploaded as a PDF to our website without subediting of text, figures and tables, but with some preliminary formatting. These papers are clearly identified by a watermark on each page of the PDF.

Q. What is a Digital Object Identifier?

A. The DOI is an international, public, "persistent identifier of intellectual property entities" in the form of a combination of numbers and letters. For Nature Portfolio journals, the DOI is assigned to an item of editorial content, providing a unique and persistent identifier for that item. The DOI system is administered by the International DOI Foundation, a not-for-profit organization. CrossRef, another not-for-profit organization, uses the DOI as a reference linking standard, enables cross-publisher linking, and maintains the lookup system for DOIs. Nature Portfolio is a member of CrossRef.

Q. What do the numbers in the DOI signify?

A. The DOI has two components, a prefix (before the slash) and a suffix (after the slash). The prefix is a DOI resolver server identifer (10) and a unique identifier assigned to the publisher—for example, the identifier for Nature Portfolio is 1038 and the entire DOI prefix for an article published by Nature Portfolio is 10.1038. The suffix is an arbitrary number provided by the publisher. It can be composed of numbers and/or letters and does not necessarily have any systematic significance. Each DOI is registered in a central resolution database that associates it with one or more corresponding web locations (URLs). For example, the DOI 10.1038/ng571 connects to http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng571.

Q. Can I use the DOI in a reference citation?

A. Yes, instead of giving the volume and page number, you can give the paper's DOI at the end of the citation. For example, Nature papers should be cited in the form;

Author(s) Nature advance online publication, day month year (DOI 10.1038/natureXXX).

After print publication, you should give the DOI as well as the print citation, to enable readers to find the paper in print as well as online. For example;

Author(s) Nature volume, page (year); advance online publication, day month year (DOI 10.1038/natureXXX).

Q. How can I use a DOI to find a paper?

A. There are two ways:

DOIs from other articles can be embedded into the linking coding of an article's reference section. In Nature journals these appear as "|Article|" in the reference sections. When |Article| is clicked, it opens another browser window leading to the entrance page (often the abstract) for another article. Depending on the source of the article, this page can be on the Nature Portfolio's site or a site of another publisher. This service is enabled by CrossRef.
A DOI can be inserted directly into the browser. For example, for the DOI 10.1038/ng571, typing http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng571 brings up the entrance page of the article.

Q. What is the official publication date?

A. Many journals, and most abstracting and indexing services (including Medline and Thomson-Reuters) cite the print date as the publication date. Publishers usually state both the 'online publication date' and the 'print publication date'. Nature Portfolio publishes both dates for our own papers, in the hope that scientific communities, as well as abstracting and indexing services, will recognize these dates.

We endeavour to include both the online publication date and the usual print citation in reference lists of Nature Portfolio papers, where a paper has been published online before being published in print. Given the use of the DOI in locating an online publication in the future, we encourage authors to use DOIs in reference citations.

For legal purposes (for example, establishing intellectual property rights), we assume that online publication constitutes public disclosure. But this is for the courts to decide; Nature Portfolio's role as a publisher is to provide clear documentation of the publication history, online and in print.

Q. Must I be a subscriber to read AOP articles?

A. Yes. AOP papers are the same as those in the print/online issues: while abstracts are freely available on any Nature Portfolio journal's web site, access to the full-text article requires a paid subscription or a site license.

Q. Does Medline use DOIs?

A. Medline currently captures DOIs with online publication dates in its records, and is developing an enhanced level of support for the DOI system.

Q. Does Thomson-Reuters use DOIs?

A. Thomson Reuters captures DOIs in its records at the same time as the volume/issue/page number. Therefore, it is not using the DOI to capture information before print publication, but rather as an additional piece of metadata.

Q. How does AOP affect the Impact Factor?

A. Impact factors are calculated by Thomson-Reuters. At present, Thomson-Reuters bases its calculations on the date of print publication alone, so until or unless it changes its policy, AOP has no effect on impact factors.

Q. What are the page numbers in PDFs of AOP papers?

A. For convenience, the PDF version of every AOP article is given a temporary pagination, beginning with page 1. This is unrelated to the final pagination in the printed article.

Quick links

Explore articles by subject
Guide to authors
Editorial policies

How To Write A Research Paper

Step-By-Step Tutorial With Examples + FREE Template

By: Derek Jansen (MBA) | Expert Reviewer: Dr Eunice Rautenbach | March 2024

For many students, crafting a strong research paper from scratch can feel like a daunting task – and rightly so! In this post, we’ll unpack what a research paper is, what it needs to do , and how to write one – in three easy steps. 🙂

Overview: Writing A Research Paper

What (exactly) is a research paper.

How to write a research paper
Stage 1 : Topic & literature search
Stage 2 : Structure & outline
Stage 3 : Iterative writing
Key takeaways

Let’s start by asking the most important question, “ What is a research paper? ”.

Simply put, a research paper is a scholarly written work where the writer (that’s you!) answers a specific question (this is called a research question ) through evidence-based arguments . Evidence-based is the keyword here. In other words, a research paper is different from an essay or other writing assignments that draw from the writer’s personal opinions or experiences. With a research paper, it’s all about building your arguments based on evidence (we’ll talk more about that evidence a little later).

Now, it’s worth noting that there are many different types of research papers , including analytical papers (the type I just described), argumentative papers, and interpretative papers. Here, we’ll focus on analytical papers , as these are some of the most common – but if you’re keen to learn about other types of research papers, be sure to check out the rest of the blog .

With that basic foundation laid, let’s get down to business and look at how to write a research paper .

Overview: The 3-Stage Process

While there are, of course, many potential approaches you can take to write a research paper, there are typically three stages to the writing process. So, in this tutorial, we’ll present a straightforward three-step process that we use when working with students at Grad Coach.

These three steps are:

Finding a research topic and reviewing the existing literature
Developing a provisional structure and outline for your paper, and
Writing up your initial draft and then refining it iteratively

Let’s dig into each of these.

Need a helping hand?

Step 1: Find a topic and review the literature

As we mentioned earlier, in a research paper, you, as the researcher, will try to answer a question . More specifically, that’s called a research question , and it sets the direction of your entire paper. What’s important to understand though is that you’ll need to answer that research question with the help of high-quality sources – for example, journal articles, government reports, case studies, and so on. We’ll circle back to this in a minute.

The first stage of the research process is deciding on what your research question will be and then reviewing the existing literature (in other words, past studies and papers) to see what they say about that specific research question. In some cases, your professor may provide you with a predetermined research question (or set of questions). However, in many cases, you’ll need to find your own research question within a certain topic area.

Finding a strong research question hinges on identifying a meaningful research gap – in other words, an area that’s lacking in existing research. There’s a lot to unpack here, so if you wanna learn more, check out the plain-language explainer video below.

Once you’ve figured out which question (or questions) you’ll attempt to answer in your research paper, you’ll need to do a deep dive into the existing literature – this is called a “ literature search ”. Again, there are many ways to go about this, but your most likely starting point will be Google Scholar .

If you’re new to Google Scholar, think of it as Google for the academic world. You can start by simply entering a few different keywords that are relevant to your research question and it will then present a host of articles for you to review. What you want to pay close attention to here is the number of citations for each paper – the more citations a paper has, the more credible it is (generally speaking – there are some exceptions, of course).

Ideally, what you’re looking for are well-cited papers that are highly relevant to your topic. That said, keep in mind that citations are a cumulative metric , so older papers will often have more citations than newer papers – just because they’ve been around for longer. So, don’t fixate on this metric in isolation – relevance and recency are also very important.

Beyond Google Scholar, you’ll also definitely want to check out academic databases and aggregators such as Science Direct, PubMed, JStor and so on. These will often overlap with the results that you find in Google Scholar, but they can also reveal some hidden gems – so, be sure to check them out.

Once you’ve worked your way through all the literature, you’ll want to catalogue all this information in some sort of spreadsheet so that you can easily recall who said what, when and within what context. If you’d like, we’ve got a free literature spreadsheet that helps you do exactly that.

Don’t fixate on an article’s citation count in isolation - relevance (to your research question) and recency are also very important.

Step 2: Develop a structure and outline

With your research question pinned down and your literature digested and catalogued, it’s time to move on to planning your actual research paper .

It might sound obvious, but it’s really important to have some sort of rough outline in place before you start writing your paper. So often, we see students eagerly rushing into the writing phase, only to land up with a disjointed research paper that rambles on in multiple

Now, the secret here is to not get caught up in the fine details . Realistically, all you need at this stage is a bullet-point list that describes (in broad strokes) what you’ll discuss and in what order. It’s also useful to remember that you’re not glued to this outline – in all likelihood, you’ll chop and change some sections once you start writing, and that’s perfectly okay. What’s important is that you have some sort of roadmap in place from the start.

You need to have a rough outline in place before you start writing your paper - or you’ll end up with a disjointed research paper that rambles on.

At this stage you might be wondering, “ But how should I structure my research paper? ”. Well, there’s no one-size-fits-all solution here, but in general, a research paper will consist of a few relatively standardised components:

Introduction
Literature review
Methodology

Let’s take a look at each of these.

First up is the introduction section . As the name suggests, the purpose of the introduction is to set the scene for your research paper. There are usually (at least) four ingredients that go into this section – these are the background to the topic, the research problem and resultant research question , and the justification or rationale. If you’re interested, the video below unpacks the introduction section in more detail.

The next section of your research paper will typically be your literature review . Remember all that literature you worked through earlier? Well, this is where you’ll present your interpretation of all that content . You’ll do this by writing about recent trends, developments, and arguments within the literature – but more specifically, those that are relevant to your research question . The literature review can oftentimes seem a little daunting, even to seasoned researchers, so be sure to check out our extensive collection of literature review content here .

With the introduction and lit review out of the way, the next section of your paper is the research methodology . In a nutshell, the methodology section should describe to your reader what you did (beyond just reviewing the existing literature) to answer your research question. For example, what data did you collect, how did you collect that data, how did you analyse that data and so on? For each choice, you’ll also need to justify why you chose to do it that way, and what the strengths and weaknesses of your approach were.

Now, it’s worth mentioning that for some research papers, this aspect of the project may be a lot simpler . For example, you may only need to draw on secondary sources (in other words, existing data sets). In some cases, you may just be asked to draw your conclusions from the literature search itself (in other words, there may be no data analysis at all). But, if you are required to collect and analyse data, you’ll need to pay a lot of attention to the methodology section. The video below provides an example of what the methodology section might look like.

By this stage of your paper, you will have explained what your research question is, what the existing literature has to say about that question, and how you analysed additional data to try to answer your question. So, the natural next step is to present your analysis of that data . This section is usually called the “results” or “analysis” section and this is where you’ll showcase your findings.

Depending on your school’s requirements, you may need to present and interpret the data in one section – or you might split the presentation and the interpretation into two sections. In the latter case, your “results” section will just describe the data, and the “discussion” is where you’ll interpret that data and explicitly link your analysis back to your research question. If you’re not sure which approach to take, check in with your professor or take a look at past papers to see what the norms are for your programme.

Alright – once you’ve presented and discussed your results, it’s time to wrap it up . This usually takes the form of the “ conclusion ” section. In the conclusion, you’ll need to highlight the key takeaways from your study and close the loop by explicitly answering your research question. Again, the exact requirements here will vary depending on your programme (and you may not even need a conclusion section at all) – so be sure to check with your professor if you’re unsure.

Step 3: Write and refine

Finally, it’s time to get writing. All too often though, students hit a brick wall right about here… So, how do you avoid this happening to you?

Well, there’s a lot to be said when it comes to writing a research paper (or any sort of academic piece), but we’ll share three practical tips to help you get started.

First and foremost , it’s essential to approach your writing as an iterative process. In other words, you need to start with a really messy first draft and then polish it over multiple rounds of editing. Don’t waste your time trying to write a perfect research paper in one go. Instead, take the pressure off yourself by adopting an iterative approach.

Secondly , it’s important to always lean towards critical writing , rather than descriptive writing. What does this mean? Well, at the simplest level, descriptive writing focuses on the “ what ”, while critical writing digs into the “ so what ” – in other words, the implications . If you’re not familiar with these two types of writing, don’t worry! You can find a plain-language explanation here.

Last but not least, you’ll need to get your referencing right. Specifically, you’ll need to provide credible, correctly formatted citations for the statements you make. We see students making referencing mistakes all the time and it costs them dearly. The good news is that you can easily avoid this by using a simple reference manager . If you don’t have one, check out our video about Mendeley, an easy (and free) reference management tool that you can start using today.

Recap: Key Takeaways

We’ve covered a lot of ground here. To recap, the three steps to writing a high-quality research paper are:

To choose a research question and review the literature
To plan your paper structure and draft an outline
To take an iterative approach to writing, focusing on critical writing and strong referencing

Remember, this is just a b ig-picture overview of the research paper development process and there’s a lot more nuance to unpack. So, be sure to grab a copy of our free research paper template to learn more about how to write a research paper.

You Might Also Like:

Can you help me with a full paper template for this Abstract:

Background: Energy and sports drinks have gained popularity among diverse demographic groups, including adolescents, athletes, workers, and college students. While often used interchangeably, these beverages serve distinct purposes, with energy drinks aiming to boost energy and cognitive performance, and sports drinks designed to prevent dehydration and replenish electrolytes and carbohydrates lost during physical exertion.

Objective: To assess the nutritional quality of energy and sports drinks in Egypt.

Material and Methods: A cross-sectional study assessed the nutrient contents, including energy, sugar, electrolytes, vitamins, and caffeine, of sports and energy drinks available in major supermarkets in Cairo, Alexandria, and Giza, Egypt. Data collection involved photographing all relevant product labels and recording nutritional information. Descriptive statistics and appropriate statistical tests were employed to analyze and compare the nutritional values of energy and sports drinks.

Results: The study analyzed 38 sports drinks and 42 energy drinks. Sports drinks were significantly more expensive than energy drinks, with higher net content and elevated magnesium, potassium, and vitamin C. Energy drinks contained higher concentrations of caffeine, sugars, and vitamins B2, B3, and B6.

Conclusion: Significant nutritional differences exist between sports and energy drinks, reflecting their intended uses. However, these beverages’ high sugar content and calorie loads raise health concerns. Proper labeling, public awareness, and responsible marketing are essential to guide safe consumption practices in Egypt.

Submit a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Print Friendly

ScienceDirect Support Center

To post social content, you must have a display name. The page will refresh upon submission. Any pending input will be lost.

How do I publish my article with Elsevier?

Follow these steps to submit your article using our online submission system Editorial Manager:

This option may not always be available as some journals do not accept submissions.
Sign in to Editorial Manager, or register if you are a first-time user.
Follow the steps to submit your article.

Helpful tools and pages

These helpful tools and pages available can help you navigate the publication process.

Finding the right journal

Browse Calls for papers
JournalFinder

Help with submitting and tracking your article

Publishing with Elsevier: step-by-step — provides a good overview of the publication process for first-time authors.
Track your accepted article — tool to track your submitted article after it has been accepted.
Journal Article Publishing Support Center — support portal for any questions related to publishing with Elsevier (e.g., open access, publication costs, fees, submission timelines) and contact information.

Was this answer helpful?

Thank you for your feedback, it will help us serve you better. If you require assistance, please scroll down and use one of the contact options to get in touch.

Help us to help you:

Thank you for your feedback!

Why was this answer not helpful?
It was hard to understand / follow.
It did not answer my question.
The solution did not work.
There was a mistake in the answer.
Feel free to leave any comments below: Please enter your feedback to submit this form

How do I use the advanced search?
What are journal pre-proofs?
What can I do on a journal home page?
What are corrected proofs?
How do I buy an article or chapter?

For further assistance:

Research Process

How to Choose a Journal to Submit an Article

3 minute read
91.9K views

Table of Contents

After so much effort bringing together the perfect article, finding the best scientific journal to submit it to becomes the next big challenge. Which one will bring the deserved awareness to your research? Which one will enhance the visibility of your work? Which one is the benchmark in your investigation field? Choosing the right journal for publication might end up being more complicated than you think.

Article publishing. Why is it important?

The saying “publish or perish” might sound familiar to you – since a researcher’s recognition and career often depend on article publishing. But that doesn’t mean diving into the first chance that comes along. From aims to scope, values and ethical practice, there are many things to take into account before choosing a journal to submit an article. If you’re submitting a paper instead of an article, it is equally important to find the right journal for your paper .

Choosing a Journal for Publication

Elsevier offers a wide range of distinguished journals, and choosing the best one to publish your research paper is much easier with our support and guidance. Using the JournalFinder , you can match your manuscript and learn more about each journal available. Powered by the Elsevier Fingerprint Engine™, JournalFinder uses smart search technology and field-of-research specific vocabularies to match your paper to the most appropriate scientific journals in a few simple steps:

1) Enter the title and abstract of your paper

2) Find journals that are best suited for your publication

3) Ultimately, the editor will decide on how well your article matches the journal

To Find Out More About a Journal

In article publishing, choosing a journal for publication is a strategically important step to give your work the opportunity to shine and attract the attention of the right people. Thus, it is not a decision to make without spending some time researching the best available publications out there. Make sure to follow these tips to get even closer to the perfect journal for you:

Read the journal’s aims and scope to make sure it is a match.
Check whether you can submit an article – some journals are invitation-only.
CiteScore metrics – helps to measure journal citation impact. Free, comprehensive, transparent and current metrics calculated using data from Scopus®, the largest abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed literature.
SJR – or SCImago Journal Rank, is based on the concept of a transfer of prestige between journals via their citation links.
SNIP – or Source Normalized Impact per Paper, is a sophisticated metric that accounts for field-specific differences in citation practices.
JIF – or Journal Impact Factor is calculated by Clarivate Analytics as the average of the sum of the citations received in a given year to a journal’s previous two years of publications, divided by the sum of “citable” publications in the previous two years.
H-index – Although originally conceived as an author-level metric, the H-index has been being applied to higher-order aggregations of research publications, including journals.
Impact: Number of times an average paper in this journal is cited.
Speed: The average number of weeks it takes for an article to be reviewed. Essentially, the average number of weeks it takes for an article to reach key publication points in the production process.
Reach: The number of downloads at the country/regional level over the last five full years available. The number of primary corresponding authors at the country/regional level, over the last five full years available.

Language Editing Services by Elsevier Author Services

Through our L anguage Editing Services , we correct proofreading errors, check for grammar and syntax to make your paper sound natural and professional. So that editors and reviewers can understand the science behind your manuscript. With more than a hundred years of experience in publishing, Elsevier today is trusted by millions of authors around the world.

Find more about How to choose a journal for your article? on Pinterest

Manuscript Preparation

How to write your references quickly and easily

Publication Process

How to Write a Journal Article from a Thesis

Descriptive Research Design and Its Myriad Uses

Doctor doing a Biomedical Research Paper

Five Common Mistakes to Avoid When Writing a Biomedical Research Paper

Making Technical Writing in Environmental Engineering Accessible

To Err is Not Human: The Dangers of AI-assisted Academic Writing

When Data Speak, Listen: Importance of Data Collection and Analysis Methods

Choosing the Right Research Methodology: A Guide for Researchers

Why is data validation important in research?

Writing a good review article

Input your search keywords and press Enter.

Want to create or adapt books like this? Learn more about how Pressbooks supports open publishing practices.

12.1 Creating a Rough Draft for a Research Paper

Learning objectives.

Apply strategies for drafting an effective introduction and conclusion.
Identify when and how to summarize, paraphrase, and directly quote information from research sources.
Apply guidelines for citing sources within the body of the paper and the bibliography.
Use primary and secondary research to support ideas.
Identify the purposes for which writers use each type of research.

At last, you are ready to begin writing the rough draft of your research paper. Putting your thinking and research into words is exciting. It can also be challenging. In this section, you will learn strategies for handling the more challenging aspects of writing a research paper, such as integrating material from your sources, citing information correctly, and avoiding any misuse of your sources.

The Structure of a Research Paper

Research papers generally follow the same basic structure: an introduction that presents the writer’s thesis, a body section that develops the thesis with supporting points and evidence, and a conclusion that revisits the thesis and provides additional insights or suggestions for further research.

Your writing voice will come across most strongly in your introduction and conclusion, as you work to attract your readers’ interest and establish your thesis. These sections usually do not cite sources at length. They focus on the big picture, not specific details. In contrast, the body of your paper will cite sources extensively. As you present your ideas, you will support your points with details from your research.

Writing Your Introduction

There are several approaches to writing an introduction, each of which fulfills the same goals. The introduction should get readers’ attention, provide background information, and present the writer’s thesis. Many writers like to begin with one of the following catchy openers:

A surprising fact
A thought-provoking question
An attention-getting quote
A brief anecdote that illustrates a larger concept
A connection between your topic and your readers’ experiences

The next few sentences place the opening in context by presenting background information. From there, the writer builds toward a thesis, which is traditionally placed at the end of the introduction. Think of your thesis as a signpost that lets readers know in what direction the paper is headed.

Jorge decided to begin his research paper by connecting his topic to readers’ daily experiences. Read the first draft of his introduction. The thesis is underlined. Note how Jorge progresses from the opening sentences to background information to his thesis.

Beyond the Hype: Evaluating Low-Carb Diets

I. Introduction

Over the past decade, increasing numbers of Americans have jumped on the low-carb bandwagon. Some studies estimate that approximately 40 million Americans, or about 20 percent of the population, are attempting to restrict their intake of food high in carbohydrates (Sanders and Katz, 2004; Hirsch, 2004). Proponents of low-carb diets say they are not only the most effective way to lose weight, but they also yield health benefits such as lower blood pressure and improved cholesterol levels. Meanwhile, some doctors claim that low-carb diets are overrated and caution that their long-term effects are unknown. Although following a low-carbohydrate diet can benefit some people, these diets are not necessarily the best option for everyone who wants to lose weight or improve their health.

Write the introductory paragraph of your research paper. Try using one of the techniques listed in this section to write an engaging introduction. Be sure to include background information about the topic that leads to your thesis.

Writers often work out of sequence when writing a research paper. If you find yourself struggling to write an engaging introduction, you may wish to write the body of your paper first. Writing the body sections first will help you clarify your main points. Writing the introduction should then be easier. You may have a better sense of how to introduce the paper after you have drafted some or all of the body.

Writing Your Conclusion

In your introduction, you tell readers where they are headed. In your conclusion, you recap where they have been. For this reason, some writers prefer to write their conclusions soon after they have written their introduction. However, this method may not work for all writers. Other writers prefer to write their conclusion at the end of the paper, after writing the body paragraphs. No process is absolutely right or absolutely wrong; find the one that best suits you.

No matter when you compose the conclusion, it should sum up your main ideas and revisit your thesis. The conclusion should not simply echo the introduction or rely on bland summary statements, such as “In this paper, I have demonstrated that.…” In fact, avoid repeating your thesis verbatim from the introduction. Restate it in different words that reflect the new perspective gained through your research. That helps keep your ideas fresh for your readers. An effective writer might conclude a paper by asking a new question the research inspired, revisiting an anecdote presented earlier, or reminding readers of how the topic relates to their lives.

Writing at Work

If your job involves writing or reading scientific papers, it helps to understand how professional researchers use the structure described in this section. A scientific paper begins with an abstract that briefly summarizes the entire paper. The introduction explains the purpose of the research, briefly summarizes previous research, and presents the researchers’ hypothesis. The body provides details about the study, such as who participated in it, what the researchers measured, and what results they recorded. The conclusion presents the researchers’ interpretation of the data, or what they learned.

Using Source Material in Your Paper

One of the challenges of writing a research paper is successfully integrating your ideas with material from your sources. Your paper must explain what you think, or it will read like a disconnected string of facts and quotations. However, you also need to support your ideas with research, or they will seem insubstantial. How do you strike the right balance?

You have already taken a step in the right direction by writing your introduction. The introduction and conclusion function like the frame around a picture. They define and limit your topic and place your research in context.

In the body paragraphs of your paper, you will need to integrate ideas carefully at the paragraph level and at the sentence level. You will use topic sentences in your paragraphs to make sure readers understand the significance of any facts, details, or quotations you cite. You will also include sentences that transition between ideas from your research, either within a paragraph or between paragraphs. At the sentence level, you will need to think carefully about how you introduce paraphrased and quoted material.

Earlier you learned about summarizing, paraphrasing, and quoting when taking notes. In the next few sections, you will learn how to use these techniques in the body of your paper to weave in source material to support your ideas.

Summarizing Sources

When you summarize material from a source, you zero in on the main points and restate them concisely in your own words. This technique is appropriate when only the major ideas are relevant to your paper or when you need to simplify complex information into a few key points for your readers.

Be sure to review the source material as you summarize it. Identify the main idea and restate it as concisely as you can—preferably in one sentence. Depending on your purpose, you may also add another sentence or two condensing any important details or examples. Check your summary to make sure it is accurate and complete.

In his draft, Jorge summarized research materials that presented scientists’ findings about low-carbohydrate diets. Read the following passage from a trade magazine article and Jorge’s summary of the article.

Assessing the Efficacy of Low-Carbohydrate Diets

Adrienne Howell, Ph.D.

Over the past few years, a number of clinical studies have explored whether high-protein, low-carbohydrate diets are more effective for weight loss than other frequently recommended diet plans, such as diets that drastically curtail fat intake (Pritikin) or that emphasize consuming lean meats, grains, vegetables, and a moderate amount of unsaturated fats (the Mediterranean diet). A 2009 study found that obese teenagers who followed a low-carbohydrate diet lost an average of 15.6 kilograms over a six-month period, whereas teenagers following a low-fat diet or a Mediterranean diet lost an average of 11.1 kilograms and 9.3 kilograms respectively. Two 2010 studies that measured weight loss for obese adults following these same three diet plans found similar results. Over three months, subjects on the low-carbohydrate diet plan lost anywhere from four to six kilograms more than subjects who followed other diet plans.

In three recent studies, researchers compared outcomes for obese subjects who followed either a low-carbohydrate diet, a low-fat diet, or a Mediterranean diet and found that subjects following a low-carbohydrate diet lost more weight in the same time (Howell, 2010).

A summary restates ideas in your own words—but for specialized or clinical terms, you may need to use terms that appear in the original source. For instance, Jorge used the term obese in his summary because related words such as heavy or overweight have a different clinical meaning.

On a separate sheet of paper, practice summarizing by writing a one-sentence summary of the same passage that Jorge already summarized.

Paraphrasing Sources

When you paraphrase material from a source, restate the information from an entire sentence or passage in your own words, using your own original sentence structure. A paraphrased source differs from a summarized source in that you focus on restating the ideas, not condensing them.

Again, it is important to check your paraphrase against the source material to make sure it is both accurate and original. Inexperienced writers sometimes use the thesaurus method of paraphrasing—that is, they simply rewrite the source material, replacing most of the words with synonyms. This constitutes a misuse of sources. A true paraphrase restates ideas using the writer’s own language and style.

In his draft, Jorge frequently paraphrased details from sources. At times, he needed to rewrite a sentence more than once to ensure he was paraphrasing ideas correctly. Read the passage from a website. Then read Jorge’s initial attempt at paraphrasing it, followed by the final version of his paraphrase.

Dieters nearly always get great results soon after they begin following a low-carbohydrate diet, but these results tend to taper off after the first few months, particularly because many dieters find it difficult to follow a low-carbohydrate diet plan consistently.

People usually see encouraging outcomes shortly after they go on a low-carbohydrate diet, but their progress slows down after a short while, especially because most discover that it is a challenge to adhere to the diet strictly (Heinz, 2009).

After reviewing the paraphrased sentence, Jorge realized he was following the original source too closely. He did not want to quote the full passage verbatim, so he again attempted to restate the idea in his own style.

Because it is hard for dieters to stick to a low-carbohydrate eating plan, the initial success of these diets is short-lived (Heinz, 2009).

On a separate sheet of paper, follow these steps to practice paraphrasing.

Choose an important idea or detail from your notes.
Without looking at the original source, restate the idea in your own words.
Check your paraphrase against the original text in the source. Make sure both your language and your sentence structure are original.
Revise your paraphrase if necessary.

Quoting Sources Directly

Most of the time, you will summarize or paraphrase source material instead of quoting directly. Doing so shows that you understand your research well enough to write about it confidently in your own words. However, direct quotes can be powerful when used sparingly and with purpose.

Quoting directly can sometimes help you make a point in a colorful way. If an author’s words are especially vivid, memorable, or well phrased, quoting them may help hold your reader’s interest. Direct quotations from an interviewee or an eyewitness may help you personalize an issue for readers. And when you analyze primary sources, such as a historical speech or a work of literature, quoting extensively is often necessary to illustrate your points. These are valid reasons to use quotations.

Less experienced writers, however, sometimes overuse direct quotations in a research paper because it seems easier than paraphrasing. At best, this reduces the effectiveness of the quotations. At worst, it results in a paper that seems haphazardly pasted together from outside sources. Use quotations sparingly for greater impact.

When you do choose to quote directly from a source, follow these guidelines:

Make sure you have transcribed the original statement accurately.
Represent the author’s ideas honestly. Quote enough of the original text to reflect the author’s point accurately.
Never use a stand-alone quotation. Always integrate the quoted material into your own sentence.
Use ellipses (…) if you need to omit a word or phrase. Use brackets [ ] if you need to replace a word or phrase.
Make sure any omissions or changed words do not alter the meaning of the original text. Omit or replace words only when absolutely necessary to shorten the text or to make it grammatically correct within your sentence.
Remember to include correctly formatted citations that follow the assigned style guide.

Jorge interviewed a dietician as part of his research, and he decided to quote her words in his paper. Read an excerpt from the interview and Jorge’s use of it, which follows.

Personally, I don’t really buy into all of the hype about low-carbohydrate miracle diets like Atkins and so on. Sure, for some people, they are great, but for most, any sensible eating and exercise plan would work just as well.

Registered dietician Dana Kwon (2010) admits, “Personally, I don’t really buy into all of the hype.…Sure, for some people, [low-carbohydrate diets] are great, but for most, any sensible eating and exercise plan would work just as well.”

Notice how Jorge smoothly integrated the quoted material by starting the sentence with an introductory phrase. His use of ellipses and brackets did not change the source’s meaning.

Documenting Source Material

Throughout the writing process, be scrupulous about documenting information taken from sources. The purpose of doing so is twofold:

To give credit to other writers or researchers for their ideas
To allow your reader to follow up and learn more about the topic if desired

You will cite sources within the body of your paper and at the end of the paper in your bibliography. For this assignment, you will use the citation format used by the American Psychological Association (also known as APA style). For information on the format used by the Modern Language Association (MLA style), see Chapter 13 “APA and MLA Documentation and Formatting” .

Citing Sources in the Body of Your Paper

In-text citations document your sources within the body of your paper. These include two vital pieces of information: the author’s name and the year the source material was published. When quoting a print source, also include in the citation the page number where the quoted material originally appears. The page number will follow the year in the in-text citation. Page numbers are necessary only when content has been directly quoted, not when it has been summarized or paraphrased.

Within a paragraph, this information may appear as part of your introduction to the material or as a parenthetical citation at the end of a sentence. Read the examples that follow. For more information about in-text citations for other source types, see Chapter 13 “APA and MLA Documentation and Formatting” .

Leibowitz (2008) found that low-carbohydrate diets often helped subjects with Type II diabetes maintain a healthy weight and control blood-sugar levels.

The introduction to the source material includes the author’s name followed by the year of publication in parentheses.

Low-carbohydrate diets often help subjects with Type II diabetes maintain a healthy weight and control blood-sugar levels (Leibowitz, 2008).

The parenthetical citation at the end of the sentence includes the author’s name, a comma, and the year the source was published. The period at the end of the sentence comes after the parentheses.

Creating a List of References

Each of the sources you cite in the body text will appear in a references list at the end of your paper. While in-text citations provide the most basic information about the source, your references section will include additional publication details. In general, you will include the following information:

The author’s last name followed by his or her first (and sometimes middle) initial
The year the source was published
The source title
For articles in periodicals, the full name of the periodical, along with the volume and issue number and the pages where the article appeared

Additional information may be included for different types of sources, such as online sources. For a detailed guide to APA or MLA citations, see Chapter 13 “APA and MLA Documentation and Formatting” . A sample reference list is provided with the final draft of Jorge’s paper later in this chapter.

Using Primary and Secondary Research

As you write your draft, be mindful of how you are using primary and secondary source material to support your points. Recall that primary sources present firsthand information. Secondary sources are one step removed from primary sources. They present a writer’s analysis or interpretation of primary source materials. How you balance primary and secondary source material in your paper will depend on the topic and assignment.

Using Primary Sources Effectively

Some types of research papers must use primary sources extensively to achieve their purpose. Any paper that analyzes a primary text or presents the writer’s own experimental research falls in this category. Here are a few examples:

A paper for a literature course analyzing several poems by Emily Dickinson
A paper for a political science course comparing televised speeches delivered by two presidential candidates
A paper for a communications course discussing gender biases in television commercials
A paper for a business administration course that discusses the results of a survey the writer conducted with local businesses to gather information about their work-from-home and flextime policies
A paper for an elementary education course that discusses the results of an experiment the writer conducted to compare the effectiveness of two different methods of mathematics instruction

For these types of papers, primary research is the main focus. If you are writing about a work (including nonprint works, such as a movie or a painting), it is crucial to gather information and ideas from the original work, rather than relying solely on others’ interpretations. And, of course, if you take the time to design and conduct your own field research, such as a survey, a series of interviews, or an experiment, you will want to discuss it in detail. For example, the interviews may provide interesting responses that you want to share with your reader.

Using Secondary Sources Effectively

For some assignments, it makes sense to rely more on secondary sources than primary sources. If you are not analyzing a text or conducting your own field research, you will need to use secondary sources extensively.

As much as possible, use secondary sources that are closely linked to primary research, such as a journal article presenting the results of the authors’ scientific study or a book that cites interviews and case studies. These sources are more reliable and add more value to your paper than sources that are further removed from primary research. For instance, a popular magazine article on junk-food addiction might be several steps removed from the original scientific study on which it is loosely based. As a result, the article may distort, sensationalize, or misinterpret the scientists’ findings.

Even if your paper is largely based on primary sources, you may use secondary sources to develop your ideas. For instance, an analysis of Alfred Hitchcock’s films would focus on the films themselves as a primary source, but might also cite commentary from critics. A paper that presents an original experiment would include some discussion of similar prior research in the field.

Jorge knew he did not have the time, resources, or experience needed to conduct original experimental research for his paper. Because he was relying on secondary sources to support his ideas, he made a point of citing sources that were not far removed from primary research.

Some sources could be considered primary or secondary sources, depending on the writer’s purpose for using them. For instance, if a writer’s purpose is to inform readers about how the No Child Left Behind legislation has affected elementary education, a Time magazine article on the subject would be a secondary source. However, suppose the writer’s purpose is to analyze how the news media has portrayed the effects of the No Child Left Behind legislation. In that case, articles about the legislation in news magazines like Time , Newsweek , and US News & World Report would be primary sources. They provide firsthand examples of the media coverage the writer is analyzing.

Avoiding Plagiarism

Your research paper presents your thinking about a topic, supported and developed by other people’s ideas and information. It is crucial to always distinguish between the two—as you conduct research, as you plan your paper, and as you write. Failure to do so can lead to plagiarism.

Intentional and Accidental Plagiarism

Plagiarism is the act of misrepresenting someone else’s work as your own. Sometimes a writer plagiarizes work on purpose—for instance, by purchasing an essay from a website and submitting it as original course work. In other cases, a writer may commit accidental plagiarism due to carelessness, haste, or misunderstanding. To avoid unintentional plagiarism, follow these guidelines:

Understand what types of information must be cited.
Understand what constitutes fair use of a source.
Keep source materials and notes carefully organized.
Follow guidelines for summarizing, paraphrasing, and quoting sources.

When to Cite

Any idea or fact taken from an outside source must be cited, in both the body of your paper and the references list. The only exceptions are facts or general statements that are common knowledge. Common-knowledge facts or general statements are commonly supported by and found in multiple sources. For example, a writer would not need to cite the statement that most breads, pastas, and cereals are high in carbohydrates; this is well known and well documented. However, if a writer explained in detail the differences among the chemical structures of carbohydrates, proteins, and fats, a citation would be necessary. When in doubt, cite.

In recent years, issues related to the fair use of sources have been prevalent in popular culture. Recording artists, for example, may disagree about the extent to which one has the right to sample another’s music. For academic purposes, however, the guidelines for fair use are reasonably straightforward.

Writers may quote from or paraphrase material from previously published works without formally obtaining the copyright holder’s permission. Fair use means that the writer legitimately uses brief excerpts from source material to support and develop his or her own ideas. For instance, a columnist may excerpt a few sentences from a novel when writing a book review. However, quoting or paraphrasing another’s work at excessive length, to the extent that large sections of the writing are unoriginal, is not fair use.

As he worked on his draft, Jorge was careful to cite his sources correctly and not to rely excessively on any one source. Occasionally, however, he caught himself quoting a source at great length. In those instances, he highlighted the paragraph in question so that he could go back to it later and revise. Read the example, along with Jorge’s revision.

Heinz (2009) found that “subjects in the low-carbohydrate group (30% carbohydrates; 40% protein, 30% fat) had a mean weight loss of 10 kg (22 lbs) over a 4-month period.” These results were “noticeably better than results for subjects on a low-fat diet (45% carbohydrates, 35% protein, 20% fat)” whose average weight loss was only “7 kg (15.4 lbs) in the same period.” From this, it can be concluded that “low-carbohydrate diets obtain more rapid results.” Other researchers agree that “at least in the short term, patients following low-carbohydrate diets enjoy greater success” than those who follow alternative plans (Johnson & Crowe, 2010).

After reviewing the paragraph, Jorge realized that he had drifted into unoriginal writing. Most of the paragraph was taken verbatim from a single article. Although Jorge had enclosed the material in quotation marks, he knew it was not an appropriate way to use the research in his paper.

Low-carbohydrate diets may indeed be superior to other diet plans for short-term weight loss. In a study comparing low-carbohydrate diets and low-fat diets, Heinz (2009) found that subjects who followed a low-carbohydrate plan (30% of total calories) for 4 months lost, on average, about 3 kilograms more than subjects who followed a low-fat diet for the same time. Heinz concluded that these plans yield quick results, an idea supported by a similar study conducted by Johnson and Crowe (2010). What remains to be seen, however, is whether this initial success can be sustained for longer periods.

As Jorge revised the paragraph, he realized he did not need to quote these sources directly. Instead, he paraphrased their most important findings. He also made sure to include a topic sentence stating the main idea of the paragraph and a concluding sentence that transitioned to the next major topic in his essay.

Working with Sources Carefully

Disorganization and carelessness sometimes lead to plagiarism. For instance, a writer may be unable to provide a complete, accurate citation if he didn’t record bibliographical information. A writer may cut and paste a passage from a website into her paper and later forget where the material came from. A writer who procrastinates may rush through a draft, which easily leads to sloppy paraphrasing and inaccurate quotations. Any of these actions can create the appearance of plagiarism and lead to negative consequences.

Carefully organizing your time and notes is the best guard against these forms of plagiarism. Maintain a detailed working bibliography and thorough notes throughout the research process. Check original sources again to clear up any uncertainties. Allow plenty of time for writing your draft so there is no temptation to cut corners.

Citing other people’s work appropriately is just as important in the workplace as it is in school. If you need to consult outside sources to research a document you are creating, follow the general guidelines already discussed, as well as any industry-specific citation guidelines. For more extensive use of others’ work—for instance, requesting permission to link to another company’s website on your own corporate website—always follow your employer’s established procedures.

Academic Integrity

The concepts and strategies discussed in this section of Chapter 12 “Writing a Research Paper” connect to a larger issue—academic integrity. You maintain your integrity as a member of an academic community by representing your work and others’ work honestly and by using other people’s work only in legitimately accepted ways. It is a point of honor taken seriously in every academic discipline and career field.

Academic integrity violations have serious educational and professional consequences. Even when cheating and plagiarism go undetected, they still result in a student’s failure to learn necessary research and writing skills. Students who are found guilty of academic integrity violations face consequences ranging from a failing grade to expulsion from the university. Employees may be fired for plagiarism and do irreparable damage to their professional reputation. In short, it is never worth the risk.

Key Takeaways

An effective research paper focuses on the writer’s ideas. The introduction and conclusion present and revisit the writer’s thesis. The body of the paper develops the thesis and related points with information from research.
Ideas and information taken from outside sources must be cited in the body of the paper and in the references section.
Material taken from sources should be used to develop the writer’s ideas. Summarizing and paraphrasing are usually most effective for this purpose.
A summary concisely restates the main ideas of a source in the writer’s own words.
A paraphrase restates ideas from a source using the writer’s own words and sentence structures.
Direct quotations should be used sparingly. Ellipses and brackets must be used to indicate words that were omitted or changed for conciseness or grammatical correctness.
Always represent material from outside sources accurately.
Plagiarism has serious academic and professional consequences. To avoid accidental plagiarism, keep research materials organized, understand guidelines for fair use and appropriate citation of sources, and review the paper to make sure these guidelines are followed.

Purdue Online Writing Lab Purdue OWL® College of Liberal Arts

Welcome to the Purdue Online Writing Lab

Welcome to the Purdue OWL

This page is brought to you by the OWL at Purdue University. When printing this page, you must include the entire legal notice.

Copyright ©1995-2018 by The Writing Lab & The OWL at Purdue and Purdue University. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, reproduced, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed without permission. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our terms and conditions of fair use.

The Online Writing Lab at Purdue University houses writing resources and instructional material, and we provide these as a free service of the Writing Lab at Purdue. Students, members of the community, and users worldwide will find information to assist with many writing projects. Teachers and trainers may use this material for in-class and out-of-class instruction.

The Purdue On-Campus Writing Lab and Purdue Online Writing Lab assist clients in their development as writers—no matter what their skill level—with on-campus consultations, online participation, and community engagement. The Purdue Writing Lab serves the Purdue, West Lafayette, campus and coordinates with local literacy initiatives. The Purdue OWL offers global support through online reference materials and services.

A Message From the Assistant Director of Content Development

The Purdue OWL® is committed to supporting students, instructors, and writers by offering a wide range of resources that are developed and revised with them in mind. To do this, the OWL team is always exploring possibilties for a better design, allowing accessibility and user experience to guide our process. As the OWL undergoes some changes, we welcome your feedback and suggestions by email at any time.

Please don't hesitate to contact us via our contact page if you have any questions or comments.

All the best,

Social Media

Facebook twitter.

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here .

Loading metrics

Open Access

Peer-reviewed

Research Article

The impact of green bond issuance on carbon emission intensity and path analysis

Roles Formal analysis, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation Harbin Business University, School of Finance, Harbin, Heilongjiang Province, China

Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

* E-mail: [email protected]

Roles Funding acquisition, Project administration, Supervision

Affiliation Harbin Business University, Harbin, Heilongjiang Province, China

Haifeng Pang,
Changxu Wu,
Liucheng Zhang

Published: June 5, 2024
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0304364
Reader Comments

Reducing carbon emission intensity is crucial for achieving sustainable development. Carbon emission intensity is expressively affected by the issuance of green bonds. Thus, it is imperative to assess the influence of green bond issuance on carbon emissions and examine their correlation. Such research holds great potential to expedite the overhaul and modernization of businesses and to construct a circular economy system. This paper uses the spatial Durbin model to draw empirical conclusions by using data from 26 provinces in China between 2016 and 2021. Firstly, under different spatial matrices, it has been analyzed that an increase of 1% in the issuance of green bonds leads to a reduction of 0.306% or 0.331% in carbon emission intensity. It shows that green bonds have the potential to substantially reduce carbon intensity. Additionally, the intensity of emissions in the current period is driven by the intensity of emissions in the previous period. Secondly, the analysis of mediated transmission suggests that green bonds can ultimately reduce carbon emission intensity by changing the energy consumption structure or improving the efficiency of green technology innovation. Thirdly, the analysis of heterogeneity shows that the inhibitory effect of green bond issuance on carbon emissions is stronger in less economically developed regions than in economically developed regions. There is a significant inhibitory effect of green bond issuance in neighboring provinces on local carbon emission intensity. This effect is present only in provinces in less economically developed regions and not in economically developed regions.

Citation: Pang H, Wu C, Zhang L (2024) The impact of green bond issuance on carbon emission intensity and path analysis. PLoS ONE 19(6): e0304364. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0304364

Editor: Shujahat Haider Hashmi, National University of Sciences and Technology, PAKISTAN

Received: January 17, 2024; Accepted: May 11, 2024; Published: June 5, 2024

Copyright: © 2024 Pang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: Explanatory Variable: Location of the data: 1. The Cathay Pacific Database (CSMAR): https://data.csmar.com/ Explained Variable: Location of the data: 1. China Energy Statistics Yearbook: https://cnki.nbsti.net/CSYDMirror/Trade/yearbook/single/N2022060061?z=Z024 2. China Statistics Yearbook: https://www.stats.gov.cn/sj/ndsj/ 3. The Carbon Emissions Trading Network: http://www.tanpaifang.com/ Control Variables: Location of the data: 1. The China Statistics Yearbook: https://www.stats.gov.cn/sj/ndsj/ 2. China Environmental Statistics Yearbook: https://cnki.nbsti.net/CSYDMirror/area/Yearbook/Single/N2021070128?z=D26 Mediating Variables: Location of the data: 1. the China Science and Technology Statistics Yearbook: https://cnki.nbsti.net/CSYDMirror/Trade/yearbook/single/N2022010277?z=Z018 2. China Energy Statistics Yearbook: https://cnki.nbsti.net/CSYDMirror/Trade/yearbook/single/N2022060061?z=Z024 3. China Industrial Statistics Yearbook: https://cnki.nbsti.net/CSYDMirror/trade/Yearbook/Single/N2022010304?z=Z012 4. China Environmental Statistics Yearbook: https://cnki.nbsti.net/CSYDMirror/area/Yearbook/Single/N2021070128?z=D26 .

Funding: The article was supported by a subject program, information on which is provided below: Project Name: Heilongjiang Province Philosophy and Social Science Research Planning Project “Digital Economy Empowering Rural Revitalization and New Urbanization Coupling Research in Heilongjiang Province”. Item: 23JYD292 Funder: LiuCheng Zhang The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

1. Introduction and literature review

As we enter the twenty-first century, it is increasingly evident that excessive carbon emissions cause harm. Greenhouse gases, if emitted excessively, will have irreversible negative impacts on human daily life and the global ecological environment. The 2005 Protocol’s formal entry into force demonstrates that reducing carbon emissions has become a major goal for all countries in their pursuit of sustainable development and global economic growth. Efficiently dealing with the pressure caused by carbon emissions has become a major social issue for China, a large carbon-emitting country. This issue not only promotes the country’s high-quality development but is also key to China’s successful transformation in the new era. China, as a major carbon-emitting country, has taken the initiative to reduce carbon emissions. In October 2021, China released the white paper ’China’s Policies and Actions to Address Climate Change,’ which highlights the country’s commitment to addressing climate change. The paper outlines measures and programs to reduce the intensity of carbon emissions and promote green economic and social development.

Scholars have approached the study of emission reduction from various perspectives. Currently, there is no consensus among scholars regarding the effect of financial development. During the initial stages of research and analysis, it was discovered that an increase in financial development leads to an expansion in production scale, which exacerbates carbon emissions (Dasgupta et al., 2001 [ 1 ]). However, Itit has been suggested by scholars that an increase in financial development is associated with a decrease in per capita carbon emissions (Shahbaz et al., 2013 [ 2 ]). Despite the development and changes over time, disagreement still exists. Among the various views on the relationship between the development of the financial sector and carbon emissions, the opinion that financial development inhibits carbon emissions is supported by a majority of scholars (Shao and Liu., 2017 [ 3 ]; Shahbaz et al., 2018 [ 4 ]; Muzzammil et al., 2022 [ 5 ]). However, a minority of scholars remain skeptical. Salahuddin et al. (2015) [ 6 ] conducted empirical research and found that financial development accelerates economic growth and increases energy consumption, thereby exacerbating the emissions of carbon. Dogan and Seker (2016) [ 7 ], Yan et al. (2016) [ 8 ] and Huang et al. (2021) [ 9 ] conducted research and the non-linear relationship between financial development and carbon emissions was found. Secondly, on the impact of green finance, researchers have not reached a unanimous conclusion. The majority of researchers are in agreement that green finance has a positive impact on the reduction of carbon emissions, Jiang et al. (2020) [ 10 ] and Arshian et al. (2022) [ 11 ] analyze the data based on the samples of 23 provinces in China and the Group of Seven, respectively, and find that green finance plays an obvious inhibitory effect on carbon emissions. There are also a few scholars who hold a negative view: Wan and Sheng (2021) [ 12 ] and Cao et al. (2021) [ 13 ] empirically analyze that it is not yet clear whether green finance will have a significant impact on the carbon emissions of the economy through the use of the linked equation model and the double difference method, respectively. In addition, there are scholars who discuss and analyze the influencing factors from other multiple perspectives and draw corresponding conclusions. For example, Sun et al. (2023) [ 14 ] combined the spatial Durbin model and the threshold regression model to analyze that the carbon productivity spatially presents high (low)-high (low) point-like spatial clustering characteristics; Guo and Sun (2017) [ 15 ], Anser et al. (2020) [ 16 ] take China and the Union of South Asian Nations as the background, respectively, using the LMDI model and the STIRPAT model to study and analyze that the population size has a positive role in promoting carbon emissions; Zhang and Zhang (2022) [ 17 ] analyze that environmental regulation is conducive to guiding enterprises to optimize in the direction of high-energy and low-pollution, so as to achieve the purpose of reducing carbon emissions. Meanwhile, direct investment (Qu and Luo, 2021 [ 18 ]), trade exchanges (Zhang et al., 2017 [ 19 ]), the level of urbanization (Zhang et al., 2016 [ 20 ]; Qi and Guo, 2022 [ 21 ]), financial and environmental protection expenditure (Li and Huang, 2022 [ 22 ]) are also studied and discussed by scholars. Finally, there have been extensive studies on the emission effect. As China entered a new development mode, the industrial CO 2 emissions of the Chinese economy were analysed (Song et al., 2021 [ 23 ]). They used the Tapio model and logarithmic mean index of differentiation to conclude that industrial CO 2 emissions shifted from high levels in the northern coastal regions to lower levels in the rest of China. The main inhibiting factors identified by the study in different periods were energy intensity and industrial structure. The distribution of industrial CO 2 emissions has shifted over time, with higher emissions now occurring in the northern coastal areas and lower emissions in the southern areas. Further analysis indicates that energy intensity and industrial structure were the primary factors inhibiting emissions in different periods. Liu et al. (2023) [ 24 ] analyzed CO 2 emissions from agricultural land in China between 1995 and 2020 using the Tapio decoupling model and the log-mean divergence index. They found that films and agriculture are the primary sources of anthropogenic CO 2 emissions from agricultural land. Further analysis reveals that the level of agricultural economy is a decisive factor in promoting the increase of CO 2 emissions. Jia et al. (2023) [ 25 ] analyzed the overall increasing trend of carbon emissions from tourism through a combination of social network analysis and the log-mean Divisia index. They concluded that the scale of tourists is the main driving force, while energy intensity is the inhibitor factor of greatest significance.

Green bonds are a crucial element of the green financial system. They can effectively direct funds towards green fields, solve the issue of insufficient funding for green low-carbon projects, and promote the gradual transformation of enterprises towards green and low-carbon practices. Additionally, they can contribute to the overall development of society. The market scale of green bonds is gradually expanding with the introduction of green bond principles and climate bond organizations in the international market. In 2015, the Hong Kong Stock Exchange issued the first Chinese green bonds, marking the official start of China’s green securities market development journey. By the end of 2022, it is expected that China’s domestic and foreign green bond stock will reach approximately 3 trillion yuan, with a new issuance size of around 983.899 billion yuan. The global green bond market reached a record high in total issuance despite the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. However, in the first half of 2022, the total number of new green bonds issued was 21% lower than the same period in 2021 due to inflationary concerns and market turmoil caused by the international conflict between Russia and Ukraine. Nowadays, the world is facing a problem with limited natural resources and ecological damage. All countries are seeking new ways of economic growth and development. Green bonds are a promising financing option worth exploring. Scholars have mainly researched this topic from two aspects, as seen in existing literature.

On the one hand, issues regarding the pricing of green bond issuances, return risk, and financing costs are present. Firstly, scholars both domestically and abroad have analyzed the "green premium" effect of green bonds, but no unanimous conclusion has been reached. Several scholars have discovered proof of the "green premium" exist through their analysis of comparative regular claims, despite the varying degrees of discounting in different regions (Britta and Dirk, 2018 [ 26 ]; Zerbib, 2018 [ 27 ]; Wang et al., 2020 [ 28 ]). Some researchers further investigate and determine that the premium is contingent. Consequently, there is a substantial green premium only if the issuer is a lower credit risk entity (Kapraun and Scheins, 2019 [ 29 ]), or if the issuance has received authoritative green certification (Hyun et al., 2020 [ 30 ]). Similarly, some scholars have presented an opposing view. Ehlers and Packer (2017) [ 31 ] found that despite a significant premium upon issuance, ordinary debentures and green bonds perform similarly in trading on the secondary market. In a similar vein, Larcker and Watts (2020) [ 32 ] concluded that there are minimal differences between green and non-green bonds across various aspects, making them nearly identical substitutes. Furthermore, utilizing the fixed effects model (Malcolm et al., 2022 [ 33 ]; Sun and Lei, 2023 [ 34 ]) and the feasible generalized least squares model (Andersson and Prag, 2015 [ 35 ]), scholars have comprehensively analyzed the green bond markets in the United States and Sweden, they found green bonds to be priced significantly higher than traditional bonds. Secondly, scholars have also discussed and researched the factors that influence the issue price and financing costs of green bonds, which are highly valued topics. Scholars have determined through econometric modeling and empirical analysis that various factors influence the issuance price of green bonds. Among these factors are the adjustment of third-party certification (Karpf and Mandel, 2018 [ 36 ]) and so on. Although the effect on liquidity risk remains less evident (Febi et al., 2018 [ 37 ]). Concerning financing cost influencing factors, empirical analysis research has concluded that higher liquidity (Zerbib, 2018 [ 27 ]), certification by a trust institution (Eichholtz et al., 2019 [ 38 ]), and a higher ESG rating of the company (Antonio and Ana, 2021 [ 39 ]) result in lower financing costs for green bonds.

On the other hand, this pertains to the economic outcomes of green bonds. In terms of the study content, scholars have initiated discussions on the economic impact of green bonds. One main finding is that green bonds enhance energy conservation and reduce emissions positively. Some scholars posit that the implementation of a green financial system can drive capital towards environmentally friendly and low-emission industries by influencing financing costs and availability. This supports the notion that green bonds could potentially aid in reducing carbon emissions (Jun, 2015 [ 40 ]; Wang et al., 2023 [ 41 ]). Ning and Wang (2021) [ 42 ] analyzed green bonds’ impact on corporate financing costs and constraints can be examined through the lenses of maturity mismatch and investor sentiment. The results of their analysis confirmed that green bonds can effectively reduce the cost of financing and the need of fund, helping businesses transform and grow. Additionally, this research examines the effect of green bonds on the stock price of companies. Before the issuance of green bonds, numerous scholars both domestically and internationally have conducted studies on the effect of ordinary debenture issuance on a company’s stock price. Findings have shown either a negative impact (Clifford et al. and SMITH, 1986 [ 43 ]; Liu, 2005 [ 44 ]; Fu et al., 2010 [ 45 ]) or no significant impact (Castillo, 2004 [ 46 ]). Scholars have focused on studying green bonds issuance. Based on empirical analysis of relevant data from six countries, Roslen et al. (2017) [ 47 ] concluded that green bonds have no impact on all events. Meanwhile, Chen (2018) [ 48 ], Liang (2018) [ 49 ], Chen and Zhang (2022) [ 50 ] conducted a study analyzing the stock prices of green bond market in China to enhance the persuasiveness of their conclusion.

This paper focuses on green bond issuance and carbon intensity in the country with the highest energy consumption and carbon emissions in the world. The research is conducted on 26 provincial administrative regions in China. Since China established the green bond system at the end of 2015, the latest data from 2016 to 2021 is analyzed to determine the impact of green bond issuance on carbon emissions. This study analyzes the transmission mechanism of green bonds on carbon emissions by considering the intermediary transmission effect. Based on the empirical analysis results, corresponding suggestions are proposed. These suggestions can guide the transformation of the market structure and facilitate the harmonious development of human society and the ecological environment.

2. Theoretical analysis

Issuing Green Bonds directly impacts carbon emissions by combining market-based environmental regulation with resource allocation. Unlike current command and incentive regulation, green bonds efficiently allocate limited financial resources to optimize the balance between the economic and environmental sectors, utilizing their internal core features.

The bond issue aims to offer financial support to the market while providing directed financial assistance to the green industry. Additionally, it aims to define the field and scope in a unified manner to facilitate accurate support for the environmental transition in China. The bond issue will play a key role in developing critical projects by providing corresponding financial funding. Environmental factors have prompted financial institutions to integrate green project and enterprise credit and project management into their system. This allows for targeted financial support for green, low-carbon projects and enterprises, while reducing funds for high-pollution and high-impact ventures. Overall, this promotes internal green transformation. Second, green bonds can also lower the expenses of environmentally friendly financing for businesses. The process of green enterprise transformation differs from basic enterprise transformation and involves uncertain outcomes and extended profit cycles, which impose significant financing constraints on enterprises investing in green projects. However, issuers of green bonds are more preferred by investors due to the benefit of lower credit spreads (Qi and Liu, 2021 [ 51 ]), thus securing funds at lower costs (Wu et al., 2022 [ 52 ]), and the People’s Bank of China designated green bonds as qualified collaterals in their open market operations, this has led to a rise in the issuance price and a decrease in the financing cost, thereby encourage corporate participation in environmental management. Thirdly, green bond issuance can enhance issuer information transparency. The conventional bond market lacks oversight over enterprises’ environmental conduct and investment flow, precluding notable advantages. The "Green Bond Assessment and Certification Organization Market-based Review Operating Rules (for Trial Implementation)" and other supporting documents can encourage third-party professional organizations to assess the utilization of accrued funds and improving the caliber of certification for green bonds. This, in turn, can prevent the occurrence of "greenwash" behavior and ensure the full utilization of funds for the relevant green projects. Green Project Construction. This paper proposes hypothesis 1 based on the analysis.

Hypothesis 1: Green bond issuance assists in reducing carbon emissions within the region.

The quality of the environment is significantly affected by changes in the structure of energy consumption. For example, a high proportion of fossil fuel consumption leads to increased carbon dioxide emissions. Upgrading and optimizing the energy structure effectively reduces carbon emissions. Green bonds were analyzed from the perspectives of production and consumption. From a consumption standpoint, green bonds can stimulate green development consciousness in enterprises through price competition, encourage low-carbon green upgrading, and facilitate the transition to sustainable consumption structures. On the production side, Liu and Ren (2019) [ 53 ] found that green finance can achieve the objective of promoting relevant enterprise equipment and technology while reducing carbon emissions by converting environmental pollution into enterprise financing costs. Achieving the promotion of upgraded technology for equipment within the enterprise is a major aspect of green finance. Green bonds also contribute to this goal by increasing the use of clean energy and decreasing reliance on fossil fuels through continuous green upgrades. This leads to improvements in the structure of energy consumption and ultimately helps to carbon emission reduction. Green bonds serve as a means of capital diversion, utilizing policy tools to guide funds towards green industries, while simultaneously advancing the development of green, low-carbon industries and increasing the production and consumption of clean energy. Through these efforts, the reduction of emissions is achieved. Hypothesis 2 is presented based on the aforementioned analysis.

Hypothesis 2: By changing the structure of energy consumption, green bonds achieve carbon emission reduction.

Green bonds can boost the advancements of green science by promoting their efficiency, which in turn significantly reduces carbon emissions. Green technology, being relatively new, has the potential to utilize the ecological environment more efficiently with its own energy-saving and carbon reduction capabilities. However, the innovation of green technology itself entails high-risk, high investment, and long cycles, leading to inconsistent preferences in the collateral process of bank credit. This generates credit constraints, affecting the circulation of the capital chain, coupled with the high cost of complying with environmental regulations, resulting in a "crowding out" effect. Under these conditions, green bonds can help ease the burden of financing and optimize the internal debt structure of businesses due to their advantages. This will promote a shift towards green, low-carbon, environmentally friendly and efficient production modes supported by the influence of various factors, leading to a reduction in carbon emissions. In this process, the spillover effect can accelerate the dissemination and green technology application, leading to a reduction in carbon emissions. Hypothesis 3 is presented based on the aforementioned analysis.

Hypothesis 3: Green bonds contribute to reducing carbon emissions by enhancing the effectiveness of green technology innovation.

3. Materials and methods

3.1. research methodology.

Using three model selection and construction methods, this paper examines the impact of green bond issuance on carbon emissions.

3.1.1. Spatial autocorrelation test.

3.1.2. Spatial weight matrix.

The basis of exploratory spatial data analysis is the spatial weight matrix; Two methods for constructing the spatial weight matrix are used in this paper.

Geographic adjacency matrix: The 0–1 weight matrix, also referred to as a geographic adjacency matrix, effectively describes the degree of association between items. Spatial adjacencies are classified into three types based on common vertices and common boundaries. These adjacencies are displayed in Fig 1 with labeling denoting Bishop, Rock, and Queen adjacencies (a), (b), and (c), respectively.

PPT PowerPoint slide
PNG larger image
TIFF original image

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0304364.g001

Geographic distance matrix: In this research, the following geographic distance matrix X is constructed to reflect the distance relationship between provinces.

Where w ij is the inverse of the geographic distance between provinces i and j. For the purposes of the article’s calculations, the capital of each province is specifically used as the province’s representative for the measure.

3.1.3. Spatial measurement models.

Since the spatial econometric model can address issues related to spatial explanatory variable autocorrelation and measurement errors, as well as quantify the impact of such variables, this paper uses this technique to evaluate carbon emission impacts of issuing green bonds and its underlying mechanisms. Eq (3) displays the general model of the standard spatial econometric model.

Where Y it and Y i , t −1 denote the explanatory variables along with their corresponding first-order lag terms, X it represents both explanatory and control variables, and W it refers to the spatial weight matrix. The coefficients for the spatial lag term of the explanatory variables are denoted by λ . The spatial autoregressive coefficient is also represented by ρ . The regression coefficients of both explanatory and control variables are indicated by α . The effects of the spatial lag terms of the explanatory variables and control variables are expressed by β . Lastly, the individual and time-fixed effects are represented by ρ i and μ i respectively. The random error term is denoted by ε it .

The model is specified as follows:

A static spatial panel model when λ = 0, Otherwise dynamic panel model.
A spatial Durbin model when φ = 0, α β ≠ 0;
Spatial autoregressive model or spatial lag model when φ = 0, β = 0, α ≠ 0;
Spatial error model when λ = θ = α = 0.

3.2. Variable selection

3.2.1. explained variables..

This study examines the impact and mechanism of green bonds on carbon emissions, with the explanatory variable being the issuance of green bonds, referred to as Greenbonds . In this study, we retrieved the issuance subject, date, and size of all green bonds issued in China from 2016 to 2021 from the Cathay Pacific database (CSMAR). Following this, we calibrated the data with the applicable provisions of the "Catalogue of Projects Supported by Green Bonds (2021 Edition)". We utilized the website "Tianyancha" to match the registered address of the bond issuers with their respective provinces. We then aggregated and organized the number of green bond issues. in each province throughout the year. Finally, after adding 1 to the result, we performed a natural logarithm transformation.

3.2.2. Explanatory variables.

Where C represents provincial emissions resulting from combustion of fossil energy; GRP represents gross regional product; j represents the eight fossil energy types, namely coal, natural gas, coke, fuel oil, gasoline, kerosene, diesel oil, and crude oil; E represents the consumption of fossil energy converted to standard coal; CF represents the average calorific value of various fuel types; COF represents the carbon oxidation factor; and EF represents the amount of carbon per unit of calorific value. Since the molecular weights of carbon and carbon dioxide are 12 and 44, respectively, 44/12 must be multiplied to the entire equation to represent the amount of carbon dioxide produced by burning more carbon in oxygen.

The regulations for the average heat output, carbon oxidation factor, and carbon content per unit of calorific value of eight fossil energy fuels are specified in Table 1 below.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0304364.t001

The carbon emission intensity values, as measured by the model and calculation method described above, are presented in Fig 2 .

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0304364.g002

3.2.3. Control variables.

Regarding the existing literature, this paper sets the following control variables: (1) Economic development level (GDP): Carbon emission intensity is directly affected by the level of economic development, which is measured by the natural logarithmic value of per capita GDP; (2) Industrial structure (SECOND, THIRD): the main task of industrial structure change is to realize carbon peak carbon neutral, and ultimately to reduce the intensity of carbon emissions, which is measured by the proportion of value added of secondary and tertiary industries to regional GDP; (3) Scale of urban development (UPD, ED): the scale of urban development affects the carbon emission intensity through both the size of population and the strength of economic development. Measured by population density (the natural logarithm of urban population density) and economic density (the natural logarithm of the ratio of gross regional product to the total regional population at the end of the year), respectively; (4) Scale of investment (INVEST): the scale of investment will indirectly affect carbon emission intensity by influencing the survival and development of enterprises, as measured by the growth rate of investment in fixed assets (excluding agricultural households); (5) Environmental regulation (ER): environmental regulation can also significantly affect the intensity of urban carbon emissions, measured by the logarithm of the amount of investment in pollution control; (6) Foreign investment (FOREIGN): foreign investment policies will promote economic development by generating different attractions, and ultimately affect the intensity of carbon emissions, expressed as the logarithm of the total amount of investment in foreign-invested enterprises.

3.2.4. Intermediary variables.

Based on the theoretical analysis, it was determined that issuing green bonds can lead to a reduction in carbon emissions by altering energy consumption patterns and facilitating the adoption of green technological innovations among large-scale industrial enterprises. As a result, this paper has chosen energy consumption patterns and green technological innovations as intermediary variables. The following section provides specific details on these variables.

Energy consumption structure: Based on the above theoretical analysis, the ECS variable measures the structure of energy consumption by the ratio of the consumption of coal to the total consumption of energy.

Green technology innovation efficiency: Three main types of measurement methods for assessing the efficiency of green technology innovation emerge from the reading and organizing of the available literature: direct measurement via regional green patents data aggregation; measurement through construct of an indicator system combined with the entropy value method; and measurement with the DEA method. Upon comprehensive analysis of the three analyses, recognize that the development of the initial indicator system can suffer from the biases of users, making it impossible to examine and derive the genuine innovation efficiency of the area objectively and accurately. Furthermore, the second analysis is hindered by the absence of corresponding data on green patents of industrial enterprises on a large scale, thereby constraining the ability to determine corresponding values. For the issue of non-anticipated outputs in the third method, utilizing the conventional DEA model is challenging and cannot be adequately addressed. Therefore, this study employs the non-radial, non-angle, non-expected output SBM-DEA model developed by Tone (2001) to assessment of the effectiveness of green technology innovation in major industrial companies in each province, Expressed in GTI . The measurement process is outlined as follows:

The specific content framework for the above variables X , Y g and Y b is shown in Table 2 below.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0304364.t002

Regarding the calculation of the urban environmental pollution index, the representative data of a province is taken as the capital city, and it is combined with the corresponding data on pollutant emissions from the China Environmental Statistical Yearbook. The ambient air pollutant concentration standards for the basic items (as presented in Table 3 ) are used to calculate the composite pollution index. Additionally, specific data for all other variables are directly obtained from the relevant statistical yearbooks.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0304364.t003

3.3. Data sources and descriptive statistics

In this paper, 26 provinces in China are used as the basic research samples from 2016–2021, and the sources mainly include (1) The data concerning green bonds is primarily sourced from the Cathay Pacific Database (CSMAR). (2) Data on carbon emissions is mainly obtained from the China Energy Statistics Yearbook, China Statistics Yearbook, and the Carbon Emissions Trading Network. (3) Control variable data is primarily sourced from the China Statistics Yearbook and China Environmental Statistics Yearbook. (4) Mediator variable data is obtained from the China Science and Technology Statistics Yearbook, China Energy Statistics Yearbook, China Industrial Statistics Yearbook, and China Environmental Statistics Yearbook.

Based on the unique policy making and economic development characteristics of municipalities, this paper excludes four municipalities from the sample of 31 provinces. Additionally, Tibet is excluded due to the absence of multiple sets of data, which makes it impossible to precisely measure the region’s development status, predict developmental trends, and renders the data unrepresentative. In summary, we have selected the remaining 26 provinces in China as the research sample to ensure the universality of the findings. By utilizing the calculation methods and fundamental data, descriptive statistics for the key variables are presented in Table 4 .

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0304364.t004

4.1. Model checking

According to the specific research methodology outlined in this paper, the model testing encompasses two primary aspects: the spatial autocorrelation test and the spatial econometric model test.

4.1.1. Spatial autocorrelation test.

The Moran index represents the correlation coefficient between observed values and their spatial lags, which are displayed in a scatter plot known as the "Moran scatter plot". Specific test results are shown in Fig 3 . The results shown in Table 5 are obtained by calculating the global Moran’s index as specified.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0304364.g003

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0304364.t005

The analysis presented in Table 5 indicates that the global Moran indexes for both green bonds and carbon emission reduction are greater than 0, with most reaching the significance level of 1%. The results show a clear link between green bond issuance and reduced carbon emissions in Chinese provinces. At the same time, with few exceptions, the overall global Moran’s index of green bonds is higher under the geographic neighbor matrix compared to the geographic distance matrix. This suggests that geographic factors have a strengthened impact on the positive spatial dependence of green bonds.

4.1.2. Spatial econometric model testing.

The model underwent LM, Hausman, LR, and Wald tests, as reflected in Table 6 .

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0304364.t006

On the basis of the findings in Table 6 , this study selects the fixed effects model as it is indicated by the significant Hausman test statistic at the 1% level under both types of matrices. The LR-test results also suggest that the time fixed effect is chosen. Finally, the LR-test and Wald-test results indicate that the statistics for both tests in SAR and SEM are significant at the 5% level. This suggests that the SDM model cannot be converted into an SAR or SEM model.

From the above analysis, the current study selects a spatial Durbin model (SDM) with fixed time effects to examine the impact of green bond issuance on reducing carbon emissions. Eq (7) demonstrates the specific model used.

Where Ci represents carbon emission intensity, Greenbonds indicates the amount of green bonds that have been issued, and control denotes the control variables, which contain eight variables, GDP , SECOND , THIRD , UPD , ED , INVEST , ER and FOREIGN , respectively. λ , ω , α n , β n represents the parameter under estimation and W is the spatial matrix. μ i , υ it denote time fixed effects and random error terms, respectively It is important to highlight that if λ equals 0, Eq (7) represents a static spatial Durbin model, and if λ does not equal 0, Eq (7) represents a dynamic spatial Durbin model.

4.2. Analysis of model results

4.2.1. analysis of spatial effects..

To examine the direct impact and spatial spillover consequences of green bond issuance on carbon emissions, the SDM model is utilized in this study to test Hypothesis 1. Analyzing the regression coefficients from the experiment, we find that, regarding the issues examined in this study, whether through analyzing the geographic neighbor matrix or the geographic distance matrix, the coefficients for green bond issuance are significantly negative in both the static and dynamic models. The issuance of green bonds has the potential to improve society’s focus on green environmental protection, increase environmental protection efforts, reduce air pollutant emissions, and strengthen air pollution control measures. Rectifying measures should strengthen the control of air pollutant emissions while improving the quality standards of enterprises in their daily operations. The combination of these approaches will reduce carbon emissions and verify hypothesis 1.

In the dynamic spatial Durbin model with explanatory variables such as the geographic proximity and distance matrices, the coefficients of the time lag terms for carbon emissions are significantly greater than 0. The current carbon emission intensity positively promotes the strengthening of the intensity of carbon emissions in the following period. This finding suggests that reducing carbon emissions is not a short-term task in the process of development but is a long-term concern. The coefficient of the relevant spatial lag term is not significant in all cases except for the geographic adjacency matrix under the static model. This implies that carbon emissions of neighboring regions only have a driving effect on each other’s emissions in the same period, but the effect remains unchanged by the distance between them. Simultaneously, the current period’s carbon emission intensity does not affect the carbon emission intensity of neighboring regions in later periods. As such, each region must establish a development and management system that is appropriate for its unique circumstances, in conjunction with the central government’s core policies, and devise effective policy measures that align with local conditions.

4.2.2. Analysis of intermediation effects.

After the theoretical analysis, the mediating effect between green bond issuance and carbon emissions is illustrated. To test hypotheses 2 and 3, we utilize Wen et al. (2022) [ 54 ] simple mediation effect model in conjunction with the model (7).

In this paper, the method corresponding to the above model is applied for testing, and the results of the test are presented in Table 7 below.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0304364.t007

In the above analysis, the results for examining the structure of energy consumption and the efficiency of green technology innovation are presented in Panels A and B, respectively. These results are combined for analysis and discussion due to the shared effect of either the geographic adjacency matrix or the geographic distance matrix in mediating effect analysis.

As evident in Panel A, the analysis of the model reveals significant results for both green bonds and energy consumption structure at the 5% level. The coefficients for green bonds are significantly negative in the outcome, signifying a crucial role of green bond issuance in curbing carbon emissions. At the same time, it is evident that issuing green bonds can affect energy consumption patterns. The structure of energy consumption, which denotes the proportion of coal consumption in total energy consumption, can be altered with the issuance of green bonds. This can result in reduced coal consumption, thus positively impacting carbon emissions. After including the energy consumption structure variable, the coefficient of green bonds changed from -0.452 to -0.368, indicating a suppressed effect and a reduced absolute value. The impact of green bonds on carbon emissions can be mitigated by the structure of energy consumption. To conclude, the analysis confirms that issuing Green Bonds can help change the structure of energy consumption and lead to reduced carbon emissions.

According to Panel B, both green bonds and green technology innovation efficiency are statistically significant at the 1% level. The coefficient of green bonds is significantly negative according to the results, which is in line with Panel A’s analysis. The conclusion infers that the issuance of green bonds improves the efficiency of green technology innovation. In addition, carbon emissions are significantly reduced through the effectiveness of green technology innovation. After incorporating the energy consumption structure, the coefficient of green bonds shifted from -0.452 to -0.390, resulting in a reduction of its absolute value. This indicates that green technology innovation efficiency can also mitigate the impact of green bonds on carbon emissions. Overall, the analysis suggests that issuing green bonds can improve the effectiveness of innovative green technologies, thereby reducing carbon emissions. The verification of hypothesis 2 and 3 is a successful outcome of the above analysis.

4.2.3. Robustness check.

To ensure objectivity in our analysis, this paper concentrates on testing the robustness of the spatial Durbin model. We utilize two methods, panel-corrected standard error estimation and lagged multi-period regression, to conduct the assessments.

Panel-corrected standard error estimates: The test outcomes are presented in S1 Appendix . According to the test results, the P-value of heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation test is 0, which indicates the existence of heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation in the sample data. The regression coefficient of green bonds was found to be still significantly negative in the results after estimation using PCSE, which is consistent with the results of spatial effect analysis, indicating that the model has reliable stability.

Lagged multi-period regression: The previous model Eq (7) underwent the lagged multi-period regression process, and the test outcomes are presented in S2 Appendix .

As shown by the test results, the regression coefficients for carbon emissions in the lagged period are significantly positive at the 1% level for both the geographic adjacency and distance matrices. Over the next three periods, these coefficients continued to show significant positivity at the 1% level. Thus, this implies that the magnitude of carbon emissions in the previous period had a notable influence on the following period’s intensity. In the regression results spanning from one lagged period to three periods, in most cases, the regression coefficients of green bonds are not significant at the 10% significance level. However, without lagging, the regression coefficients of green bonds are significant at the 10% significance level. This indicates to a certain extent that the model is smooth.

4.2.4. Heterogeneity analysis.

Given the impact of economic development, the 26 sampled provinces will be categorized into economically developed and underdeveloped regions according to their per capita GDP, in compliance with the standard set by the China Statistical Yearbook. Each group was regressed using Eq (6) , as shown in Table 8 below.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0304364.t008

From the findings in Table 8 , it is evident that green bonds have a significant negative correlation with carbon emissions at the 5% level for both economically developed and underdeveloped regions, given the two types of matrices. However, in the economically underdeveloped regions, the absolute value of the coefficient of the impact of green bonds and the coefficient of the spatial interaction term under the conditions of the two types of matrices is greater than that of the economically developed regions. This indicates that green bond issuance has a stronger inhibitory effect on carbon emissions in economically underdeveloped regions compared to economically developed regions. In economically developed regions, the presence of multiple emission mitigation mechanisms and the influence of numerous factors may reduce the impact of green bonds on carbon emissions. Conversely, in economically underdeveloped regions with fewer pathways, the role played by regional green bonds on emissions reduction is more pronounced. Furthermore, when the coefficients of the spatial interaction terms of green bonds in the two regions are combined, it is evident that the spatial regression coefficients of both regions are significantly negative at the 1% level when based on the geographic distance matrix. In addition, the coefficients of the economically developed regions are not significant, while those of the economically underdeveloped regions are significantly negative at the 10% level when based on the geographic neighboring matrix. Based on the geographic distance matrix cell values, which are inversely proportional to the distance between regions, our analysis shows that neighborhoods that issue green bonds substantially reduce local carbon emissions. This effect changes inversely with geographic distance and is particularly noted in provinces with lower economic development. Interestingly, this effect was not observed in economically developed regions.

5. Discussion

The issuance of green bonds can impact carbon emission intensity in two ways. Firstly, green bonds can promote the conversion of consumption structure and convert environmental pollution into financing costs by stimulating enterprises’ green awareness and promoting equipment technology upgrading (Liu and Ren, 2019). At the same time, capital flow is also guided and channeled towards relevant green enterprises through green bonds to promote the construction of green and low-carbon industries. This will improve the structure of energy consumption and reduce carbon emission intensity. On the other hand, green bonds can promote the efficiency of green technological innovation. However, the technology itself has some disadvantages, such as high risk, high investment, and long cycles, which can lead to credit constraints. Additionally, environmental regulations can cause a crowding-out effect. However, green bonds can alleviate financing constraints and optimize the internal debt composition of enterprises, promoting technological innovation efficiency and reducing carbon emissions. As the economy rapidly develops, green bonds are increasingly playing a role in global green development. The empirical model’s test results indicate that a 1% increase in green bond issuance leads to a reduction of 0.306% and 0.331% in carbon emission intensity based on the geographic proximity matrix and geographic distance matrix, respectively. This suggests that green bond issuance can effectively reduce carbon emission intensity.

The impact of green bond issuance on carbon emission intensity varies across different economic development regions. From a spatial perspective, it can be analyzed that the issuance of green bonds under different levels of economic development does not have the same impact on carbon emissions in neighboring provinces. Economically developed areas tend to have more technological advancements and resources, resulting in a greater number of options for reducing carbon emissions. This includes a wider range of green bond alternatives, which can help to reduce the impact of green bonds on carbon emissions in the local area. As a result, the inhibitory effect of green bond issuance on carbon emissions is stronger in economically underdeveloped areas compared to economically developed areas. Additionally, economic development can impact the issuance of green bonds. The spillover effect of green bond issuance in the region can have varying degrees of influence on surrounding areas. Learning to efficiently use new environmentally friendly tools to improve the environment while promoting rapid economic development through natural symbiosis, in order to achieve efficient ecological protection.

At the same time, it is necessary to recognize three limitations of this work. The first is that in the selected interval, the new crown epidemic that began in early 2020 had a significant impact on economic development, leaving the representativeness of the data for 2020 and 2021 to be demonstrated. Second, the selected interval is six years in total, which is a short interval based on the availability of existing data. Third, there is the problem of selecting intermediate variables. The selected energy consumption structure and green technology innovation efficiency can be analyzed by theory and empirical evidence, but there may be other transmission channels. Therefore, based on the above limitations, in the future research work, the sample data of the new crown epidemic interval will be analyzed and compared separately to eliminate the influence of the epidemic period to improve the accuracy of the conclusion. For the length of intervals, with the gradual release of statistical yearbooks and related information, the study period will be gradually extended to enhance the persuasiveness of the article. For the analysis of transmission path research, in the follow-up work, all possible ways of influence will be considered as comprehensively as possible, in order to analyze the transmission path between the two in a more complete way.

6. Conclusions and police recommendations

This study analyzes sample data from 26 Chinese provinces issued between 2016 and 2021, in terms of green bonds and carbon emissions, combined with the spatial Durbin model to empirically analyze and study the relationship between the impact of green bond issuance on carbon emissions, and at the same time, add the mediating effect to analyze the impact of green bonds on the path of carbon emissions, combined with the empirical results of the analysis of the findings: (1) Issuing green bonds negatively correlates with regional carbon emissions under varying spatial weight matrices, suggesting that emitting less carbon is associated with a higher number of issued green bonds. Additionally, empirical analysis reveals that the intensity of carbon emissions in the subsequent period is positively driven by the current period’s carbon emission intensity, and neighboring regions’ carbon emissions in the current period have a driving effect on the region; (2) Green bonds can help reduce carbon emissions by adjusting energy consumption structures or improving the efficiency of green technology innovation; (3) Further analysis shows that, due to the more advanced and rich technology in developed regions, they can produce a greater effect in reducing carbon emissions compared to the impact of economic development alone. This means that green bonds are a more effective alternative to reduce carbon emissions, which also reduces the impact of green bonds on carbon emissions unilaterally in the local area. Therefore, the inhibition effect of carbon emissions from green bond issuance in less developed regions is stronger than in economically developed regions. Additionally, in economically underdeveloped regions, neighboring regions’ issuance of green bonds significantly inhibits carbon emissions in the area, while this effect is not observed in economically developed regions.

Based on the conclusions drawn from the above studies, the following recommendations are targeted respectively: (1) Continue to advance the growth of the green bond market in adherence to the original direction. Avoid tailoring to societal and market shifts, and adeptly employ the green tools of the contemporary era in environmental enhancement, ultimately bolstering ecological protection efficacy. At the same time, we should give consideration to the objective disclosure of information and establish stricter environmental disclosure requirements as part of the internal assessment process for businesses. This will encourage a more standardized market and maximize the effectiveness of green bonds in promoting environmental governance. (2) Various measures can be implemented to enhance the drive towards high-quality economic growth and to facilitate the expeditious advancement of society. From a societal standpoint, tax incentives related to green and low-carbon areas can be adjusted to facilitate financing expansion, promote increased attention and participation in green development, and popularize green development. Additionally, financing methods for enterprises can be improved during development by increasing the proportion of green bonds and leveraging the benefits of sustainable development to enhance competitive advantage. (3) Formulate policies and systems for green reforms that are suitable for the practical and localized development of the region, considering the level of marketization and environmental protection in the current context. One approach is to strengthen penalties for environmental pollution through legislation and other means. Another approach is to deepen financial system reforms to ease financing constraints associated with green technological innovation. Additionally, promoting green investment and financing can facilitate multi-faceted joint efforts towards coexistence of humanity and the environment.

Supporting information

S1 dataset..

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0304364.s001

S1 Appendix. Panel-corrected standard error estimation test results.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0304364.s002

S2 Appendix. Model lagged multi-period regression results.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0304364.s003

View Article
Google Scholar
PubMed/NCBI
29. Kapraun J, Scheins C. (In)-Credibly Green: Which Bonds Trade at a Green Bond Premium? Paris December 2019 Finance Meeting. 2019;.
35. Andersson S, Prag K. Green bonds: Doing well by doing good. Lund University; 2015.

UIJRT » United International Journal for Research & Technology

Call For Papers - June 2024
[email protected]
ISSN: 2582-6832
Google Scholar

Metacognitive Skills of Grade 10 Students

Author(s): Julie-Ann S. Legaspi and Noel G. Benavides

PAPER DETAILS

Educational Management
Paper ID: UIJRTV5I70033
Pages: 359-374

This study aimed to assess the metacognitive skills of the Grade 10 students in Matnog District Division of Sorsogon Province for school year 2022-2023. It employed a descriptive-survey method of research which involved the 150 Grade 10 students from the different secondary schools in Matnog District. Also, an instrument was used in gathering the primary data in which the statistical tools utilized were frequency, percentage, and weighted mean. It was revealed that majority of the study spent 6 hours and below in studying, doing household chores, and engaging in entertainment. However, they slept for 7 hours and above. The students who studied, done household chores, and engaged in entertainment for 7 hours and above are very much so in their metacognitive skills along cognitive strategy, planning, and self-checking. On the other hand, the students engaged in entertainment for 4 to 6 hours are very much so aware of their metacognitive skills.

Related Papers

Factors that influence technical vocational students’ choice of specialization in relation to their academic performance in deped division of sorsogon, comprehensible inputs to scaffold comprehension of l2 learners, school-based management journey of select school in sorsogon city, financial management of school heads in magallanes districts, best practices on brigada eskwela of celso f. falcotelo national high school: a case study, learning materials based on 7e model in teaching systematics for grade 12 stem learners, effectiveness of jigsaw classroom strategy in learning mathematics, technical and vocational strand-based worktext for improving reading competence of grade 12 learners, job satisfaction of junior high school teachers, level of students’ motivation and engagement: basis for an enhanced intervention to promote students’ learning.

UIJRT is a open access, peer-reviewed & multidisciplinary engineering, technology and science journal that publishes original review and research articles.

Privacy Policy
Refund Policies

Author's Links

Call For Papers
Area of Publication
Current Issue
Past Issues
Processing Fee
Submit Manuscript
Editorial Board Members

Have you any query?

E-Mail: [email protected]
E-Mail: [email protected]
Phone: +91-7007979966

Social Site Profiles

Privacy Overview

For conference & paper publication.

ISSN Approved Journal
Open Access Journal
Fast Indexing Journal

UIJRT Publication - International Journal

Sociology and Criminology

Sociology as a vocation: the life of steve wieting.

Long-time Sociology Professor Stephen G. Wieting, age 83, passed away on July 22, 2023. Steve began his career in the Sociology Department at the University of Iowa in 1971 after receiving his PhD from the University of Minnesota. He officially retired in 2008 but continued to come into the office for more than a decade, always fashionably clad in an ironed shirt, tie, and dress pants. He was a great man – kind, articulate, intelligent, and introspective.

Wieting was an expert in the Sociology of Sport and Sociology of the Family, teaching courses in those areas as well as Research Methods. Within the sports world, Steve was particularly interested in marathon runners from Kenya, curling players from Canada, and cyclists from all nations who participated in the Tour de France. He also developed an expertise in Icelandic culture, traveling to Iceland several times to better understand the people and society. He was an exceptional mentor to both undergrads and graduate students, maintaining relationships with many for several decades. In honor of his commitment to students, the S tephen G. Wieting Award was established for the best theory paper submitted to the annual Iowa Sociological Association conference.

Steve’s door was (literally) always open, as he believed that an important part of being in an academic department was to develop a sense of community among its members. At lunchtime, he would pull out his bike and invite staff and faculty to join him in a lunchtime ride out to Coralville. If athletics wasn’t your thing, he would suggest a Budweiser after work at George’s Buffet. Steve had a way of combining work and leisure in a fun and effortless way – long before work-life balance had become a catchphrase.

Developing a community for undergraduates was also important to Steve. He ran the undergraduate Sociology Club for many years, inviting students to his home for end-of-the year cookouts as well as accompanying them to the annual Iowa Sociological Association conference. Maintaining connections was also one of Steve’s hallmarks. After graduation, Steve would send his students handwritten letters, keeping them apprised of happenings in the department, as well as the sports scene in Iowa City.

One of Steve’s most popular courses was a year-long course in which students would learn to conduct their own research. One of his students from this class remarked “The fact that Professor Wieting challenges his class is something that sets his class apart from others… Also, he allows his students the opportunity to come into talk to him at any time, and this is a huge advantage. It put me in a situation personally where I am no longer taking a class, but rather acquiring knowledge because he has so much of it.”

Steve’s graduate students also greatly admired him. Joel Kallich, who studied with Steve in the 1970s, remarked “Steve had more integrity, intelligence, and kindness than most people, and made me and the world a better place. He was a unicorn among a clutch of chickens. He was the best professor I ever had and changed my life.”

In his 70s, Steve did not slow down. In 2015, at the age of 75, Steve published a book titled, The Sociology of Hypocrisy: an Analysis of Sport and Religion . His last major piece of research, the book encompassed his interests in sport, religion, and morality. And in his late 70s, Steve became an active member of the Hawkeye Community Rowing Club, showing up for daily practice on the Iowa River at 6 a.m.

Steve was an invaluable colleague and close friend of many students, staff, and faculty. He will be greatly missed.

NOTICE: The University of Iowa Center for Advancement is an operational name for the State University of Iowa Foundation, an independent, Iowa nonprofit corporation organized as a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt, publicly supported charitable entity working to advance the University of Iowa. Please review its full disclosure statement.

👇 Recommended LLS Courses to Excel in this Opportunity

Home » Opportunities & Events » Fests, MUNs and Other Competitions » Manmitra Research Paper Competition 2024 by ManMitra Education Trust in association with the Faculty of Law, Banasthali Vidyapith [Cash Prizes + Certficate]: Submit by July 30

Manmitra Research Paper Competition 2024 by ManMitra Education Trust in association with the Faculty of Law, Banasthali Vidyapith [Cash Prizes + Certficate]: Submit by July 30

Jun 5, 2024
No Comments

ManMitra Education Trust in association with the Faculty of Law, Banasthali Vidyapith is organizing a research paper competition in the field of law for the year 2024.

About Banasthali Vidyapith

It stands as one of the largest residential women’s universities having more than 15,000 students on its 850-acre campus situated amidst rural settings in Rajasthan providing comprehensive holistic education to students from nursery to doctoral level across a wide spectrum of disciplines.

About ManMitra Education Trust

Mantra Initiative is a self-funded initiative dedicated to parents for their support and teachings to their daughters.

This initiative established a trust named “Man Mitra Education Trust ” in 2023 with a vision & mission to create a society where legal education and research thrive, contributing to the betterment of society through well-informed and socially responsible legal professional and to provide resources, opportunities, and support to individuals in the legal field, fostering a community dedicated to legal excellence and societal progress.

About the Competition

Manmitra Education Trust in association with the Faculty of Law, Banasthali Vidyapith is organizing a Research Paper competition in the field of law. All scholars and students are invited to participate and submit their original research papers/articles on any theme within this field. The aim of the competition is to encourage academic discourse and innovation.

Eligibility

The competition is open to all scholars and students pursuing law or management enrolled in an accredited institution.

Submission Guidelines

The paper must be original, unpublished and not pending publication elsewhere.

Submissions can be made in any area of law.
APA or Bluebook citation styles must be followed.
The paper should be free from plagiarism (a maximum limit of 15% plagiarism is allowed).
The title of the paper
Name of the author/s
Name of the institution
Contact details including the e-mail of the author.
The word limit of the paper shall not be less than 3000 words and shall not exceed 7000 words
Co-authorship is allowed only up to two authors, i.e., one main author and one co- author.
Any work exceeding plagiarism of more than 15% shall be rejected. The author will be intimated about their selection through email provided by the author.

How to Submit?

Interested participants can submit their papers through the link provided at the end of the post.

Review Process

Submissions will be reviewed by our esteemed review committee.

The top 10 papers will be selected based on originality of content, research depth, clarity of expressions, and relevancy of the theme to the contemporary issues in the prescribed field.

Awards & Prizes

The top 10 selected authors will be awarded a cash prize along with a certificate of achievement.
The top 3 papers will be awarded with the best paper award.
Also, selected papers will be published in a peer-reviewed journal with the consent of the author, granting further recognition to the author. Once the author consents to the publication, s/he may not be allowed to send the paper to any other journal for publication.

The last date for paper submission is July 30, 2024.

For any queries, Contact: [email protected] .

Click here to submit.

Join Our WhatsApp Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get Daily Updates

Join our Telegram Channel for Opportunity Updates

Get an Internship

Add a Comment Cancel reply