Transact-SQL
Reinforcement Learning
R Programming
React Native
Python Design Patterns
Python Pillow
Python Turtle
Verbal Ability
Company Questions
Artificial Intelligence
Cloud Computing
Data Science
Machine Learning
Data Structures
Operating System
Compiler Design
Computer Organization
Discrete Mathematics
Ethical Hacking
Computer Graphics
Software Engineering
Web Technology
Cyber Security
C Programming
Control System
Data Mining
Data Warehouse
Get full access to Software Architecture Patterns and 60K+ other titles, with a free 10-day trial of O'Reilly.
There are also live events, courses curated by job role, and more.
The most common architecture pattern is the layered architecture pattern, otherwise known as the n-tier architecture pattern. This pattern is the de facto standard for most Java EE applications and therefore is widely known by most architects, designers, and developers. The layered architecture pattern closely matches the traditional IT communication and organizational structures found in most companies, making it a natural choice for most business application development efforts.
Components within the layered architecture pattern are organized into horizontal layers, each layer performing a specific role within the application (e.g., presentation logic or business logic). Although the layered architecture pattern does not specify the number and types of layers that must exist in the pattern, most layered architectures consist of four standard layers: presentation, business, persistence, and database ( Figure 1-1 ). In some cases, the business layer and persistence layer are combined into a single business layer, particularly when the persistence logic (e.g., SQL or HSQL) is embedded within the business layer components. Thus, smaller applications may have only three layers, whereas larger and more complex business applications may contain five or more layers.
Each layer of the layered architecture pattern has a specific role and responsibility within the application. For example, a presentation layer would be responsible for handling all user interface and browser communication logic, whereas a business layer would be responsible for executing specific business rules associated with the request. Each layer in the architecture forms an abstraction around the work that needs to be done to satisfy a particular business request. For example, the presentation layer doesn’t need to know or worry about how to get customer data; it only needs to display that information on a screen in particular format. Similarly, the business layer doesn’t need to be concerned about how to format customer data for display on a screen or even where the customer data is coming from; it only needs to get the data from the persistence layer, perform business logic against the data (e.g., calculate values or aggregate data), and pass that information up to the presentation layer.
One of the powerful features of the layered architecture pattern is the separation of concerns among components. Components within a specific layer deal only with logic that pertains to that layer. For example, components in the presentation layer deal only with presentation logic, whereas components residing in the business layer deal only with business logic. This type of component classification makes it easy to build effective roles and responsibility models into your architecture, and also makes it easy to develop, test, govern, and maintain applications using this architecture pattern due to well-defined component interfaces and limited component scope.
Notice in Figure 1-2 that each of the layers in the architecture is marked as being closed . This is a very important concept in the layered architecture pattern. A closed layer means that as a request moves from layer to layer, it must go through the layer right below it to get to the next layer below that one. For example, a request originating from the presentation layer must first go through the business layer and then to the persistence layer before finally hitting the database layer.
So why not allow the presentation layer direct access to either the persistence layer or database layer? After all, direct database access from the presentation layer is much faster than going through a bunch of unnecessary layers just to retrieve or save database information. The answer to this question lies in a key concept known as layers of isolation .
The layers of isolation concept means that changes made in one layer of the architecture generally don’t impact or affect components in other layers: the change is isolated to the components within that layer, and possibly another associated layer (such as a persistence layer containing SQL). If you allow the presentation layer direct access to the persistence layer, then changes made to SQL within the persistence layer would impact both the business layer and the presentation layer, thereby producing a very tightly coupled application with lots of interdependencies between components. This type of architecture then becomes very hard and expensive to change.
The layers of isolation concept also means that each layer is independent of the other layers, thereby having little or no knowledge of the inner workings of other layers in the architecture. To understand the power and importance of this concept, consider a large refactoring effort to convert the presentation framework from JSP (Java Server Pages) to JSF (Java Server Faces). Assuming that the contracts (e.g., model) used between the presentation layer and the business layer remain the same, the business layer is not affected by the refactoring and remains completely independent of the type of user-interface framework used by the presentation layer.
While closed layers facilitate layers of isolation and therefore help isolate change within the architecture, there are times when it makes sense for certain layers to be open. For example, suppose you want to add a shared-services layer to an architecture containing common service components accessed by components within the business layer (e.g., data and string utility classes or auditing and logging classes). Creating a services layer is usually a good idea in this case because architecturally it restricts access to the shared services to the business layer (and not the presentation layer). Without a separate layer, there is nothing architecturally that restricts the presentation layer from accessing these common services, making it difficult to govern this access restriction.
In this example, the new services layer would likely reside below the business layer to indicate that components in this services layer are not accessible from the presentation layer. However, this presents a problem in that the business layer is now required to go through the services layer to get to the persistence layer, which makes no sense at all. This is an age-old problem with the layered architecture, and is solved by creating open layers within the architecture.
As illustrated in Figure 1-3 , the services layer in this case is marked as open, meaning requests are allowed to bypass this open layer and go directly to the layer below it. In the following example, since the services layer is open, the business layer is now allowed to bypass it and go directly to the persistence layer, which makes perfect sense.
Leveraging the concept of open and closed layers helps define the relationship between architecture layers and request flows and also provides designers and developers with the necessary information to understand the various layer access restrictions within the architecture. Failure to document or properly communicate which layers in the architecture are open and closed (and why) usually results in tightly coupled and brittle architectures that are very difficult to test, maintain, and deploy.
To illustrate how the layered architecture works, consider a request from a business user to retrieve customer information for a particular individual as illustrated in Figure 1-4 . The black arrows show the request flowing down to the database to retrieve the customer data, and the red arrows show the response flowing back up to the screen to display the data. In this example, the customer information consists of both customer data and order data (orders placed by the customer).
The customer screen is responsible for accepting the request and displaying the customer information. It does not know where the data is, how it is retrieved, or how many database tables must be queries to get the data. Once the customer screen receives a request to get customer information for a particular individual, it then forwards that request onto the customer delegate module. This module is responsible for knowing which modules in the business layer can process that request and also how to get to that module and what data it needs (the contract). The customer object in the business layer is responsible for aggregating all of the information needed by the business request (in this case to get customer information). This module calls out to the customer dao (data access object) module in the persistence layer to get customer data, and also the order dao module to get order information. These modules in turn execute SQL statements to retrieve the corresponding data and pass it back up to the customer object in the business layer. Once the customer object receives the data, it aggregates the data and passes that information back up to the customer delegate, which then passes that data to the customer screen to be presented to the user.
From a technology perspective, there are literally dozens of ways these modules can be implemented. For example, in the Java platform, the customer screen can be a (JSF) Java Server Faces screen coupled with the customer delegate as the managed bean component. The customer object in the business layer can be a local Spring bean or a remote EJB3 bean. The data access objects illustrated in the previous example can be implemented as simple POJO’s (Plain Old Java Objects), MyBatis XML Mapper files, or even objects encapsulating raw JDBC calls or Hibernate queries. From a Microsoft platform perspective, the customer screen can be an ASP (active server pages) module using the .NET framework to access C# modules in the business layer, with the customer and order data access modules implemented as ADO (ActiveX Data Objects).
The layered architecture pattern is a solid general-purpose pattern, making it a good starting point for most applications, particularly when you are not sure what architecture pattern is best suited for your application. However, there are a couple of things to consider from an architecture standpoint when choosing this pattern.
The first thing to watch out for is what is known as the architecture sinkhole anti-pattern . This anti-pattern describes the situation where requests flow through multiple layers of the architecture as simple pass-through processing with little or no logic performed within each layer. For example, assume the presentation layer responds to a request from the user to retrieve customer data. The presentation layer passes the request to the business layer, which simply passes the request to the persistence layer, which then makes a simple SQL call to the database layer to retrieve the customer data. The data is then passed all the way back up the stack with no additional processing or logic to aggregate, calculate, or transform the data.
Every layered architecture will have at least some scenarios that fall into the architecture sinkhole anti-pattern. The key, however, is to analyze the percentage of requests that fall into this category. The 80-20 rule is usually a good practice to follow to determine whether or not you are experiencing the architecture sinkhole anti-pattern. It is typical to have around 20 percent of the requests as simple pass-through processing and 80 percent of the requests having some business logic associated with the request. However, if you find that this ratio is reversed and a majority of your requests are simple pass-through processing, you might want to consider making some of the architecture layers open, keeping in mind that it will be more difficult to control change due to the lack of layer isolation.
Another consideration with the layered architecture pattern is that it tends to lend itself toward monolithic applications, even if you split the presentation layer and business layers into separate deployable units. While this may not be a concern for some applications, it does pose some potential issues in terms of deployment, general robustness and reliability, performance, and scalability.
The following table contains a rating and analysis of the common architecture characteristics for the layered architecture pattern. The rating for each characteristic is based on the natural tendency for that characteristic as a capability based on a typical implementation of the pattern, as well as what the pattern is generally known for. For a side-by-side comparison of how this pattern relates to other patterns in this report, please refer to Appendix A at the end of this report.
Get Software Architecture Patterns now with the O’Reilly learning platform.
O’Reilly members experience books, live events, courses curated by job role, and more from O’Reilly and nearly 200 top publishers.
Get Mark Richards’s Software Architecture Patterns ebook to better understand how to design components—and how they should interact.
Dive in for free with a 10-day trial of the O’Reilly learning platform—then explore all the other resources our members count on to build skills and solve problems every day.
Home » Computer Network
Description and Functions of Presentation Layer in the OSI model: In this tutorial, we are going to learn what the Presentation layer is and the Functions of the Presentation Layer in the OSI model in Computer Networking. We will also discuss the Design issues with the Presentation Layer and the working of the Presentation Layer with the help of its diagram. By Monika Jha Last updated : May 05, 2023
The Presentation Layer is concerned with the syntax and semantics of the information exchanged between two communicating devices.
This figure shows the relationship of the presentation layer to the session layer and application layer.
The following are the design issues with presentation layer:
Specific functionalities of the presentation layer are as follows:
Example: Convert ASCII code to EBCDIC code.
Related Tutorials
Comments and Discussions!
Load comments ↻
Copyright © 2024 www.includehelp.com. All rights reserved.
26 August 2015
Martin Fowler
team organization
encapsulation
application architecture
web development
One of the most common ways to modularize an information-rich program is to separate it into three broad layers: presentation (UI), domain logic (aka business logic), and data access. So you often see web applications divided into a web layer that knows about handling HTTP requests and rendering HTML, a business logic layer that contains validations and calculations, and a data access layer that sorts out how to manage persistent data in a database or remote services.
On the whole I've found this to be an effective form of modularization for many applications and one that I regularly use and encourage. It's biggest advantage (for me) is that it allows me to reduce the scope of my attention by allowing me to think about the three topics relatively independently. When I'm working on domain logic code I can mostly ignore the UI and treat any interaction with data sources as an abstract set of functions that give me the data I need and update it as I wish. When I'm working on the data access layer I focus on the details of wrangling the data into the form required by my interface. When I'm working on the presentation I can focus on the UI behavior, treating any data to display or update as magically appearing by function calls. By separating these elements I narrow the scope of my thinking in each piece, which makes it easier for me to follow what I need to do.
This narrowing of scope doesn't imply any sequence to programming them - I usually find I need to iterate between the layers. I might build the data and domain layers off my initial understanding of the UX, but when refining the UX I need to change the domain which necessitates a change to the data layer. But even with that kind of cross-layer iteration, I find it easier to focus on one layer at a time as I make changes. It's similar to the switching of thinking modes you get with refactoring's two hats .
Another reason to modularize is to allow me to substitute different implementations of modules. This separation allows me to build multiple presentations on top of the same domain logic without duplicating it. Multiple presentations could be separate pages in a web app, having a web app plus mobile native apps, an API for scripting purposes, or even an old fashioned command line interface. Modularizing the data source allows me to cope gracefully with a change in database technology, or to support services for persistence that may change with little notice. However I have to mention that while I often hear about data access substitution being a driver for separating the data source layer, I rarely hear of someone actually doing it.
Modularity also supports testability, which naturally appeals to me as a big fan of SelfTestingCode . Module boundaries expose seams that are good affordance for testing . UI code is often tricky to test, so it's good to get as much logic as you can into a domain layer which is easily tested without having to do gymnastics to access the program through a UI 1 . Data access is often slow and awkward, so using TestDoubles around the data layer often makes domain logic testing much easier and responsive.
1: A PageObject is also an important tool to help testing around UIs.
While substitutability and testability are certainly benefits of this layering, I must stress that even without either of these reasons I would still divide into layers like this. The reduced scope of attention reason is sufficient on its own.
When talking about this we can either look at it as one pattern (presentation-domain-data) or split it into two patterns (presentation-domain, and domain-data). Both points of view are useful - I think of presentation-domain-data as a composite of presentation-domain and domain-data.
I consider these layers to be a form of module, which is a generic word I use for how we clump our software into relatively independent pieces. Exactly how this corresponds to code depends on the programming environment we're in. Usually the lowest level is some form of subroutine or function. An object-oriented language will have a notion of class that collects functions and data structure. Most languages have some form of higher level called packages or namespaces, which often can be formed into a hierarchy. Modules may correspond to separately deployable units: libraries, or services, but they don't have to.
Layering can occur at any of these levels. A small program may just put separate functions for the layers into different files. A larger system may have layers corresponding to namespaces with many classes in each.
I've mentioned three layers here, but it's common to see architectures with more than three layers. A common variation is to put a service layer between the domain and presentation, or to split the presentation layer into separate layers with something like Presentation Model . I don't find that more layers breaks the essential pattern, since the core separations still remain.
The dependencies generally run from top to bottom through the layer stack: presentation depends on the domain, which then depends on the data source. A common variation is to arrange things so that the domain does not depend on its data sources by introducing a mapper between the domain and data source layers. This approach is often referred to as a Hexagonal Architecture .
These layers are logical layers not physical tiers. I can run all three layers on my laptop, I can run the presentation and domain model in a desktop with a database on a server, I can split the presentation with a rich client in the browser and a Backed For Frontend on the server. In that case I treat the BFF as a presentation layer as it's focused on supporting a particular presentation option.
Although presentation-domain-data separation is a common approach, it should only be applied at a relatively small granularity. As an application grows, each layer can get sufficiently complex on its own that you need to modularize further. When this happens it's usually not best to use presentation-domain-data as the higher level of modules. Often frameworks encourage you to have something like view-model-data as the top level namespaces; that's OK for smaller systems, but once any of these layers gets too big you should split your top level into domain oriented modules which are internally layered.
Developers don't have to be full-stack but teams should be.
One common way I've seen this layering lead organizations astray is the AntiPattern of separating development teams by these layers. This looks appealing because front-end and back-end development require different frameworks (or even languages) making it easy for developers to specialize in one or the other. Putting those people with common skills together supports skill sharing and allows the organization to treat the team as a provider of a single, well-delineated type of work. In the same way, putting all the database specialists together fits in with the common centralization of databases and schemas. But the rich interplay between these layers necessitates frequent swapping between them. This isn't too hard when you have specialists in the same team who can casually collaborate, but team boundaries add considerable friction, as well as reducing an individual's motivation to develop the important cross-layer understanding of a system. Worse, separating the layers into teams adds distance between developers and users. Developers don't have to be full-stack (although that is laudable) but teams should be.
I've written about this separation from a number of different angles elsewhere. This layering drives the structure of P of EAA and chapter 1 of that book talks more about this layering. I didn't make this layering a pattern in its own right in that book but have toyed with that territory with Separated Presentation and PresentationDomainSeparation .
For more on why presentation-domain-data shouldn't be the highest level modules in a larger system, take a look at the writing and speaking of Simon Brown . I also agree with him that software architecture should be embedded in code.
I had a fascinating discussion with my colleague Badri Janakiraman about the nature of hexagonal architectures. The context was mostly around applications using Ruby on Rails, but much of the thinking applies to other cases when you may be considering this approach.
Web request-response cycle
Web application architecture following the three-tier pattern
Business layer, persistence layer, example #1. dynamic web pages, spas, and mpas, single page applications.
Single Page Application architecture
MPA architecture
Enterprise application architecture
INLS161-002 Spring 2017 Tools for Information Literacy Manning 117 M-W 3:35pm - 4:50 pm
Session Date: Wednesday Feb 01, 2017
Preparation for this session.
For the presentational layer class, read from Learning web design : a beginner's guide to HTML, CSS, Javascript, and web graphics , 4th Edition.
Look over Chapter 11. Cascading Style Sheets Orientation
If you wish, you may also want to look over Chapter 12. Formatting Text: (Plus More selectors) through Chapter 18. CSS Techniques, but you are not required to read them prior to class. We will touch on some of the topics, but will spend more time on the Chapter 11 topics.
the W3C discussion of CSS
× [ top/reload prep panel ]
Take a look at this example on the codepen site. Play around with the CSS. See if you can change the background color, font color and text sizes. We will go over more CSS examples in this session. Here's a flipped out CSS example using CSS3, just to show you how complicated CSS can get. Example "C" will mess with your head the most, I think. You will not be required to code CSS beyond the basics.
See the Pen CSS Introduction by Lawrence Jones ( @lblakej ) on CodePen .
The presentation layer (Layer 6) ensures that the message is presented to the upper layer in a standardized format. It deals with the syntax and the semantics of the messages.
The main functions of the presentation layer are as follows −
Related Articles
Get certified by completing the course
Chapter 4. Layered Architecture for Web Applications | ||
---|---|---|
Part II. Architectures for the Web |
Table of Contents
The first question that should be answered: Why the web is suitable for developing applications? It is not a difficult question, of course. In the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) Architecture of the Web Recommendation paper various examples are given, notably one about a user who wants to see the weather in a place where she wants to travel to. The nature of the Internet - trafficking data over protocols from network to network - is a powerful resource that make communication between different places very fast and easy. This way computer programs can be made to improve the relation between systems and people, and what is seen today is that it happened.
Web applications are distributed applications, and hence are at least two-tiered. They act as a special kind of client-server applications, where a large portion of the functionality is “pushed” back to the server side despite the fact that the Web does not define what is behind the server.
The Web relies strongly in the client-server model, and it uses markup languages such as HTML and XML to transfer and represent data. Under it there are many programming and scripting languages that can dynamically process, modify and generate data, or give an user interface. This way, the development of Web applications can be put under the cover of software engineering but need to be extended. Web applications are multidisciplinary (software engineering, database modeling techniques, network computing, and effective interface design). They are built in a continuously changing environment where requirements are unstable and the user community is wider than before. Web applications handle information from various sources (text, graphics, video, audio) dealing with structuring, processing, storing and presenting this information.
The nature of the Web is layered: it has formats over protocols and uses a client-server model. Therefore, it is natural that a layered architecture would be suitable for developing to the Web. We learnt that this model overcame the two layered client-server because of its scalability. Many different approaches to the aim of developing applications with different layers had been used along the years, but a clear pattern seems to appear frequently in various of them: the Three Layers Model (according to Kappel et al. 2006).
This model of web application development is very similar to the Service Layer/Domain Model/Data Source Layer set of design patterns from Martin Fowler’s collection, but receiving different names . In fact, the idea ( usually named 3-tier architecture, or expanded into n-tier architecture) is very general and widespread, so in this paper only the most common assumptions and uses are examined. [1]
Its conception is three layers, one over the other, being the application the set of them working together. The most external of them is the View Layer, that is the visible part of the application, the one that interacts with the user. The layer in the middle is the Business Logic Layer, which serves as an intermediate between the View (or presentation) and the innermost layer, that is the Data Layer. This last one is where all the data used by the application is stored.
The benefits of using layered models in software development are in the way that it is easier to know exactly what each part of the application does. It makes easier to construct the application, to debug it, and to maintain and reuse the code. For example, if it is needed to exchange some details in the presentation of the content but the business rules and data models do not change, only one layer is affected. Even for more complicated changes involving all of the application architecture there are benefices, so a plan can be created in the overall but specifying exactly where the changes need to be done.
The outermost layer in this kind of model deals with the presentation of the content and interaction with the user. It can be called view, presentation, UI. In this layer the application shows to the user what is needed to be seen and gives the tools for interaction. The exact kind of interaction depends on the application; one can create a web app that only shows information to the user without any kind of interaction, not even hyperlinks to be clicked, but such a case does not need an advanced architecture. In most cases the user will generate some input, send it for processing and then receive a feedback, that can be the final result or a step for further operations.
Following the example by W3C of the user that wants to see the weather in her trip destination, the presentation is where she sees the actual content. The content display is shown, and the user can interact with the provided controls to, for example, see weather in different periods of time or another places, and see pictures of it.
The technologies usually involved in this layer on the web development context are mainly the markup that is processed by the browser (HTML/ XHTML/ ...), the style of the page (CSS) and client-side scripts (Javascript/ Flash/ ...). All of these tools together can produce a rich environment for user interaction and content display. Of course it can be said that server-side scripts can be used to generate content, but at the final level these scripts produce the HTML that will be shown be the browser, so this role of the development can be subdivided: the content generation is created by the business logic layer (the next topic to be discussed) and then it is passed to the view layer, maintaining the logical division of the application. The browser shows the content initially written or produced by the server-side scripts, and the client-side scripts are able to modify that content. A Javascript code, for example, can be used to validate form data or even to create drag and drop interfaces. It interacts with HTML through a DOM tree, that is a representation of the document in memory. HTML5, the present (2014) trend for web development is praised for its flexibility, specially where it touches the concept of responsiveness, that is the ability to change the content disposition according to the screen size. This matters because, in current days, the availability of a page in different screen sizes and devices is extremely important. Having many possibilities like desktops, tablets, smartphones, wearable devices and even augmented reality or voice user interface, the range of technologies and targets for the view layer is very wide, and it shows both the importance of it to the user and reinforce the need of a logical division of the application for supporting such variety.
This layer communicates with the business logic layer under it, passing the information from the user and controlling it, then giving back any response it produces, not leaving any decisions of the application’s logic to be resolved by the UI. This passing of information is usually done through forms, like a user log-in in a system by giving username and password, but there are other ways. AJAX is an asynchronous way to pass information to the server and get responses. The cited a-synchronicity comes from the fact that in a form the content needs to be passed and then the response will come after a page refresh, but with AJAX the requested information, that is the result of the user’s action will come in the actual page. It saves time and gives to the user the impression that the application is really interacting with him.
The central layer of the model deals with the logic of the program. It receives data from the upper level and transforms it, using in the inner application logics. It also retrieves data from the deepest data level and uses it to the logics. And, by integrating these two processes, it can do modifications in both levels as well.
The Business Logic Layer contains the determinant part of the application logic. It includes:
performing all required calculations and validations
managing workflow
state management: to keep track of application execution
session management: to distinguish among application instances
user identification
service access: to provide application services in a consistent way
managing all data access for the presentation layer
The Business Logic Layer is generally implemented inside an Application server (like Microsoft Transaction Server, Oracle Application Server, or IBM WebSphere). The Application server generally automates a number of services like transactions, security, persistence, connection pooling, messaging and name services.
Using the same example of the last session, of the user that wants to see the weather in a specific place, when the information is given by the user the application retrieves it and process. For example, the user wants to see the weather forecast for two days. The application receives its request from the UI and the data is sent to the server. A PHP script catches it and then make the calls for the lower level to get the needed data. When a response comes, being it the desired information or a failed request, it is dealt and then prepared to be sent again to the upper level.
The tools used in this level are usually server-side scripts like PHP,ASP.NET, Ruby or CGI. There is even a solution that uses server-side Javascript, called node.js. These technologies, following the information feeding that comes from the upper level, can do any computational pro- cessing that is needed. The CGI (Common Gateway Interface) scripts are an older technology that defines communication way between a server and the content-generated program, in this context called CGI script. One of the most remembered languages when talking about CGI scripts is Perl. The other languages here cited have a similar approach, by running inside a server. PHP is related to Perl, being as well a scripting language and having similar philosophies. It is one of the most popular languages, being the implementation language of important content management systems as Drupal or Wordpress. Ruby have a large popularity too, especially with the framework Ruby on Rails. Applications as Github or Redmine are built using it. There are many others, of course, and different uses of them, one example being C used as CGI or the Java Server Pages (JSP).
The deepest level in the layered architecture, the data layer deals with data retrieval from its sources. It is an abstraction to get the plain data, that can be in a wide variety of forms. Once again, it plays a huge role on the reusability and exchange of technologies: if one data source is changed to another, but the proper data is still the same, a good layered design can help by providing the same data to the upper level with the same interfaces, changing only its inner logic.
In the example given in this paper of the weather forecast, the requirement by the user for the next days forecast will come to this level as a request for the forecasts that it may have. Then a search will be made in the data using the given parameters, and then the data (or some information about not getting it) will be sent again to the upper level.
The technologies used in this layer are database management systems like MySQL or PostgreSQL for relational databases, NoSQL management systems like MongoDB or Apache Cassandra, or even plain XML files or text files. For the management systems usually an API will be used for making queries and retrieving data, and for the plain text ones a script will do the needed operations. Inside it there can be any level of sophistication desired by the application designer, so there can be integrity checks, stored procedures, and virtually anything needed to maintain the data in the desired state.
Deepest in the Data Layer: NoSQL and NewSQL
Inside the Data Layer, as it was outlined, many different technologies can be used. Most of the web applications currently active use relational databases, but now the market is seeing a change of paradigm in the form of the NoSQL. NoSQL is a general way to identify non-relational databases. Fowler summarises some common characteristics that NoSQL databases share:
Not using the relational model
Running well on clusters
Open-source
Built for the 21st century web estates
The key points NoSQL supporters use to justify the need for it is that relational databases are not the best solution for any kind of problem, being a problem of its own the uses. They say it is heavy, slow, and non-scalable to use the relational databases, so the use of NoSQL can be a good way to solve these kinds of problems. The use of NoSQL nowadays seems related to startups that use innovating new technology and social web services such as Facebook and Amazon, that have a great amount of data [2] to deal with and have the need to find new ways to use it.
In fact, that is this demand of large data processing. Under the label of big data lies the concept of large quantities of data generated in the last few years and from different sources and in a variety of different formats. The processing of this kind of data leads to a wide range of uses, from healthcare to criminalistics inferences. Of course, new challenges arises with this perspective. The drawbacks come from the nature of the data - massive, disperse, heterogeneous. This is why NoSQL can be seen as a solution - it thinks about this kind of problem, trying to solve it.
As of 2014, there are four important categories of NoSQL databases:
key-value stores , that are basically hash tables
column family stores , which aim is to deal with vast collections of data spread amongst many different machines
document databases , versioned documents that are collections of other key-value collections
and graph databases , where the data is presented as a graph, and then it is possible to divide easily into different machines and the queries are more data-specific than the relational ones
A topic that attracts attention when it comes to the issue of scalability and performance of databases is the so-called NewSQL. It is more a way to recognise “ the various emerging database products at this particular point in time”. The authors writing about it use the term as an identification of vendors that provide SQL databases that are high-performance and scalable, in the market that is also aimed by NoSQL providers. The aims of NewSQL are also related to the Big Data paradigm. [3]
[1] Sometimes tier is different from layer. For it, layers mean the logical distinction of the applications integral parts, and tiers mean the physical structures in where the application runs (networks, computers, servers). But in this work the two words are used as synonyms, and with the meaning of layer, not being the objective to discuss physical tiers.
[2] “The increasing amount of data in the web is a problem which has to be considered by successful web pages like the ones of Facebook, Amazon and Google. Besides dealing with tera- and petabytes of data, massive read and write requests have to be responded without any noticeable latency”
HECHT, Robin and JABLONSKI, Stefan. NoSQL Evaluation, A Use Case Oriented Survey.
[3] “The NoSQL projects were developed in response to the failure of existing suppliers to address the performance, scalability and flexibility requirements of large-scale data processing, particularly for Web and cloud computing applications. NewSQL and data-grid products have emerged to meet similar requirements among enterprises, a sector that is now also being targeted by NoSQL vendors.”
ASLETT, Matthew. NoSQL, NewSQL and Beyond: The answer to SPRAINed relational databases.
Part II. Architectures for the Web | The MVC pattern - useful but not a silver bullet |
What is the osi model.
How a single bit travels from one computer to the next is a complex concept. In 1984, the open systems interconnection (OSI) model was published as a framework for network communication. The model breaks down computer network communication into seven layers. All of the layers work together to create a digital message. The message is built as it moves down the protocol stack. However, it is not sent to another network until it reaches the physical layer.
The model helps IT, computer science, and cybersecurity professionals understand how a single bit travels from one computer to the next by breaking the system into these layers.
From physical devices to user interfaces (UI), this model explains the communication role of each layer in overall computer networking. This article will start by introducing the Physical Layer (Layer 1).
The physical layer is where data moves across network interfaces as digital signals. Additionally, this is where the transmitting and receiving of network communication occurs. Starting with the Application Layer the message moves down the OSI model, and it eventually reaches the Physical Layer for transmission. When the message is received by the physical layer, the message will then move up the OSI layers until it reaches the final application layer.
Electrical signals received (or transmitted) to the physical layer are linked and translated to digital logic in the data-Link layer . Computer devices may be networked at the Data-Link layer, but only as a Local Area Network (LAN). Connecting a LAN to another LAN occurs at Layer 3.
Within Layer 2, the Protocol Data Unit (PDU) known as a frame consists of a header, footer, and data. Understanding how a frame is structured is important for network traffic analysis.
Additionally, within Layer 2, physical addresses are assigned and are also known as MAC addresses and/or hardware addresses in networking. MAC addresses are unique to each device on a local network. They are 48-bits in length and are assigned in hexadecimal characters.
Some other things to note about Layer 2 is that there are a few protocols that reside in it that we should know about:
Additionally, Layer 2 is split into two sublayers:
When we think of the internet, we are thinking of interconnected networks. Interconnecting networks refer to a Local Area Network (LAN) connection to neighboring or remote networks. Layer 3 of the OSI model, the network layer , is where internetworking takes place and is where logical addresses are assigned to networked devices. A primary function of this layer is to route network packets from one LAN to another. Routing requires IP addresses and logical mapping of other networks across the internet to properly deliver messages. Another important function of Layer 3 is its ability to fragment and reassemble large communication. When Layer 3 passes a message down to Layer 2 for transmission, message length limits may be encountered in some cases.
Additionally, Layer 3 is the layer where the protocols used to route communication between networks reside. A few common network protocols are:
Within Layer 3, the Protocol Data Unit (PDU) is the packet . Packets encapsulate data intended for transmission with header and footer data.
The IPv4 protocol encapsulates data with IPv4 header information necessary for delivery. For example, the 32-bit packet format contains the source address, the destination address, protocol, time-to-live (TTL), etc. in the IPv4 header data.
The transport layer , Layer 4, is responsible for being the go-between the abstract layers of the OSI model (Layers 7-5) and the concrete communication layers (Layers 3-1).
Depending on the type of application, the transportation of that application’s communication will need to be handled in a specific way. For example, basic web browsing communication uses Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) . HTTP communicates via a specific connection service type and port. The transport layer is responsible for delivering/receiving the HTTP communication and maintaining the connection throughout the HTTP communication.
The Protocol Data Unit (PDU) at Layer 4 is known as a data segment . Segmentation is the process of dividing raw data into smaller pieces. Once the raw data is packaged from the higher application layers it is segmented at the transport layer before being passed to the Network Layer.
The transport layer protocols are divided into two categories depending on their connection service type:
This connection type establishes a logical connection between two devices prior to beginning communication across a network. Connection-oriented protocols typically maintain service connection by following a set of rules that initiate, negotiate, manage, and terminate the communication. The Transport Layer protocols will also retransmit any data that is received without acknowledgment. The most common Connection-Oriented protocol is the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) and its process to manage a connection between two devices is called the Three-Way Handshake . In TCP communication, the communicating devices typically share a client/server relationship where a client initiates communication with a service. The handshake involves the process of sending special TCP messages to synchronize a state of negotiated connection in communication.
In connectionless communication, the protocol does not establish a connection between client and server. Instead, once a request is made to the server, the server sends all data without initiation, negotiation, or management of connection. Connectionless protocols also do not attempt to correct any interruptions in data transmission. Once the server sends the data, the server is not concerned if the client receives it.
When TCP or UDP are used to establish communication, the communication is assigned a port as the Layer 4 address. A port is a logical assignment given to processes and their respective application protocols on a computing system. A few important facts to memorize about ports are:
The session layer starts, manages, and terminates sessions between end-user application processes. Sessions are considered the persistent connection between devices. A session is application-focused; sessions are not concerned with layers 1-4. Instead, the session layer controls dialog between two networked devices. It is considered to facilitate host-to-host communication. Sessions dialog may be controlled through synchronization checkpoints, and through management of communication modes. There are two modes of communication permitted at Layer 5:
The session layer resembles a phone conversation. For example, when a person picks up a phone and calls someone else a session is created. Once the communication on the call is completed, the session is terminated by hanging up the phone. In computing, software applications are making the phone call and establishing a session.
Two common Layer 5 protocols still used today are:
The presentation layer is primarily responsible for presenting data so that the recipient will understand the data. Data formatting and encoding protocols apply at Layer 6 to ensure data is legible and presented properly in the application receiving it. Data compression is also a function of Layer 6. If necessary, data may be compressed to improve data throughput over network communication.
Some common Layer 6 protocols are ASCII , JPEG , GIF , MPEG , and PNG .
Another main function of the presentation layer is the encryption and decryption of data sent across a network. Most encryption communication protocols straddle multiple layers of the OSI model, but the actual encryption function is Layer 6.
Two of the most common secure communication protocols are:
The topmost layer of the OSI model is the application layer . On computer systems, applications display information to the user via the UI.
Note : Software applications running on a computer are NOT considered to reside in the application layer. Instead, they leverage application layer services and protocols that enable network communication.
For example, the user can craft messages and access the network from the application layer. A web browser application allows a user to access a web page. The user may input information and receive information through the web browser. However, the application layer protocol HTTP performs the network communication function. The web browser and HTTP work closely together, and the distinction between the two may be subtle. Yet, HTTP is the web browsing protocol for all web browser applications. In contrast, no single web browser software exclusively utilizes HTTP.
HTTP is one of many common application layer protocols. Below are a few additional protocols to know. It is also good practice to memorize the associated port assigned to the protocols:
Protocol | Port Number(s) | Description |
---|---|---|
(DNS) | 53 | Translates internet names to their globally registered IP addresses. For example, “google.com” is registered in global DNS as IP address 8.8.8.8. |
(HTTPS) | 443 | Sends data to and from web browsers and web servers, but securely with the Secure Socket Layer (SSL) protocol. |
FTP | 20, 21 | Transfers files from a client to a server and vice versa. |
(SSH) | 22 | Connects to computers remotely and in a secure, encrypted way. |
(SMTP) | 25 | Sends and receives email. |
(DHCP) | 67 | Automatically assigns IP addresses to devices on a network. |
(IRC) | 194 | Used in a client/server method. IRC clients communicate through an IRC server. |
(POP3) | 110 (unsecured), 995 (secured) | Used for email where the client receives mail by downloading it locally to a computer from a server mailbox. |
The OSI model breaks down computer network communication into seven layers. All of the layers work together to create a digital message. Understanding the OSI model will help you communicate with other network technologists. Computer networking may seem complex, but, with a bit of study, you can gain this knowledge to become an effective Cybersecurity Analyst.
Cybersecurity analyst interview prep, code foundations.
All websites combine structure, style, and behaviors
Css: the styles layer, javascript: the behavior layer.
Jennifer Kyrnin is a professional web developer who assists others in learning web design, HTML, CSS, and XML.
People who work in the web design industry liken front-end website development to a three-legged stool. These three legs—the three layers of web development—comprise the structure, style, and behaviors of a site.
When you're creating a web page, its structure should be relegated to your HTML, visual styles to the CSS , and behaviors to scripts. Some of the benefits of separating the layers are:
The structure or content layer of a web page is the underlying HTML code of that page. Just as a house's frame creates a strong foundation upon which the rest of the house is built, a solid foundation of HTML creates a platform upon which a website can be created.
The structure layer is where you store all the content that your customers want to read or look at. HTML structure can consist of text and images, and it includes the hyperlinks that visitors will use to navigate around the website. This information is coded in standards-compliant HTML5 and can include text, images, and multimedia (video, audio, etc.).
Every aspect of a site's content should be represented in the structure layer. This separation allows customers who have JavaScript turned off or who can't view CSS access to the entire website, if not all of its functionality.
This layer dictates how a structured HTML document will look to a site's visitors and is defined by CSS (Cascading Style Sheets). These files contain stylistic instructions for how the document should be displayed in a web browser. The style layer usually includes media queries that change a site's display based on screen size and device .
All visual styles for a website should reside in an external stylesheet. You can use multiple stylesheets, but every CSS file requires an HTTP request to fetch it, affecting site performance .
The behavior layer makes a website interactive, allowing the page to respond to user actions or to change based on a set of conditions. JavaScript is the most commonly used language for the behavior layer, but CGI and PHP are very frequently used, too.
When developers refer to the behavior layer, most of them mean the layer that is activated directly in the web browser. Use this layer to interact directly with the Document Object Model. Writing valid HTML in the content layer is important for DOM interactions in the behavior layer. When you build in the behavior layer, you should use external script files, just as with CSS, to optimize speed and performance.
The syntax and the semantics of the information exchanged between two communication systems is managed by the presentation layer of the OSI Model .
Before going through the design issues in the presentation layer, some of its main functions are:
Design issues with Presentation Layer :
Similar reads, improve your coding skills with practice.
Earlier in this course you learned to control the presentation of your web content using Cascading Style Sheets (CSS). In this lesson, you will learn how to control web page presentation using your web authoring software. Some web authoring software provides direct support for CSS, while other products handle presentation in other ways. which may or may not be compliant with web standards. Which category does your web authoring software fall into? How could its support for CSS be improved?
At the completion of this exercise, you will be able to:
CSS is integrated tightly into Dreamweaver, so there are many ways to define and edit styles and assign them to various elements on the page. Here are a few tips:
Like Dreamweaver, KompoZer includes a dialog box from which you can create CSS style definitions by selecting values for various properties. As of version 0.8b3, this feature is accessed from the main menu by selecting Tools > CSS Editor.
After you've defined CSS classes, these appear in a dropdown list on the toolbar, so they can easily be assigned to any element just by selecting the element, then choosing the desired class from the toolbar.
Below is a screen shot of the CSS Editor in KompoZer:
Share your newly stylized portfolio home page with your instructor. Be prepared to explain to the instructor which styles you changed and how, in order to attain the current look and feel of your web page. When you're finished, proceed to the next lesson .
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Prerequisite : OSI Model. Introduction : Presentation Layer is the 6th layer in the Open System Interconnection (OSI) model. This layer is also known as Translation layer, as this layer serves as a data translator for the network. The data which this layer receives from the Application Layer is extracted and manipulated here as per the required ...
The presentation layer is the lowest layer at which application programmers consider data structure and presentation, instead of simply sending data in the form of datagrams or packets between hosts. This layer deals with issues of string representation - whether they use the Pascal method (an integer length field followed by the specified ...
Key protocols: Protocols like HTTP, FTP and SMTP operate at this layer, enabling services such as web browsing, file transfers and email communications. Layer 6: Presentation Layer. Role: The Presentation Layer acts as a translator, converting data formats from the application layer into a network-compatible format and vice versa. It ensures ...
The Web Presentation Layer, also known as the user interface layer, is the web application layer responsible for presenting data and interacting with users. The Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern ...
Presentation layer: This is the user interface of the web application. It is responsible for the visual aspects of the web application, such as the design of the user interface, the layout of the ...
The presentation layer typically includes web components such as controllers, views, and templates. Business Layer. The business (or application) layer handles the web application 's business logic. It contains controllers, services, and models responsible for performing the necessary actions to fulfill user requests.
Presentation Layer: Responsible for handling user input and displaying the user interface. Business Logic Layer: Contains the application's business rules and logic.
The presentation layer contains the components that implement and display the user interface and manage user interaction. This layer includes controls for user input and display, in addition to components that organize user interaction. Figure 1 shows how the presentation layer fits into a common application architecture.
The presentation layer ensures the information that the application layer of one system sends out is readable by the application layer of another system. On the sending system it is responsible for conversion to standard, transmittable formats. [7] On the receiving system it is responsible for the translation, formatting, and delivery of ...
The presentation layer is the 6 th layer from the bottom in the OSI model. This layer presents the incoming data from the application layer of the sender machine to the receiver machine. It converts one format of data to another format of data if both sender and receiver understand different formats; hence this layer is also called the ...
Each layer of the layered architecture pattern has a specific role and responsibility within the application. For example, a presentation layer would be responsible for handling all user interface and browser communication logic, whereas a business layer would be responsible for executing specific business rules associated with the request.
Functionalities of the Presentation Layer. Specific functionalities of the presentation layer are as follows: 1. Translation. The processes or running programs in two machines are usually exchanging the information in the form of numbers, character strings and so on before being transmitted. The information should be changed to bitstreams ...
web development. One of the most common ways to modularize an information-rich program is to separate it into three broad layers: presentation (UI), domain logic (aka business logic), and data access. So you often see web applications divided into a web layer that knows about handling HTTP requests and rendering HTML, a business logic layer ...
Most web applications are developed by separating its main functions into layers, or tiers. This allows you to easily replace and upgrade each layer independently. This architectural pattern is called Multi- or Three-Tier Architecture. Web application architecture following the three-tier pattern. Presentation layer
For the presentational layer class, read from Learning web design : a beginner's guide to HTML, CSS, Javascript, and web graphics, 4th Edition. Look over Chapter 11. Cascading Style Sheets Orientation. If you wish, you may also want to look over Chapter 12. Formatting Text: (Plus More selectors) through Chapter 18.
The Presentation Layer of OSI Model. The presentation layer (Layer 6) ensures that the message is presented to the upper layer in a standardized format. It deals with the syntax and the semantics of the messages. The main functions of the presentation layer are as follows −. It encodes the messages from the user dependent format to the common ...
The nature of the Web is layered: it has formats over protocols and uses a client-server model. Therefore, it is natural that a layered architecture would be suitable for developing to the Web. We learnt that this model overcame the two layered client-server because of its scalability. Many different approaches to the aim of developing ...
In Domain-Driven Design (DDD), a layered architecture is often used to organize the solution domain into different parts. For example, it may consist of a presentation layer, an application layer, a domain layer, and an infrastructure layer. The presentation layer handles user interaction, the application layer implements the use cases and ...
The transport layer, Layer 4, is responsible for being the go-between the abstract layers of the OSI model (Layers 7-5) and the concrete communication layers (Layers 3-1). Depending on the type of application, the transportation of that application's communication will need to be handled in a specific way.
The Three Layers of Web Design. All websites combine structure, style, and behaviors. People who work in the web design industry liken front-end website development to a three-legged stool. These three legs—the three layers of web development—comprise the structure, style, and behaviors of a site.
Prerequisite - Layers of OSI Model Data-link layer is the second layer after the physical layer. The data link layer is responsible for maintaining the data link between two hosts or nodes. Before going through the design issues in the data link layer. Some of its sub-layers and their functions are as following below. The data link layer is divided
From the main menu, select Modify > CSS Styles. A window appears that shows all styles that apply to the page, or to the selected content. Double-clicking any CSS selector within this window brings up a CSS Rule Definition window like the one shown below. This window can be used to define styles simply by selecting options.