Low-dose amitriptyline (tricyclic antidepressant) with psychotherapy and behavioral therapies
Based on the search strategy described above, we screened all the papers identified and specifically looked for psychological interventions reported in these publications. Figure Figure1 1 shows the flowchart of the studies that were screened and included in this review.
Description of study selection process for systematic review .
We initially found 2944 publications related to VCD. Majority of these publications were review articles, diagnostic studies, related to other vocal cord disorders, or case reports that did not describe any psychological assessment or interventions and hence were excluded. The remaining 30 manuscripts were carefully reviewed by the authors to assess the usefulness of psychological interventions that were reported. Among these 30 manuscripts, another 14 were excluded as they did not describe any specific psychological intervention (3), reported only psychological assessment (4), or included cases of spasmodic dysphonia (7). After this step, there were 16 manuscripts that described some form of psychological intervention and these were selected for inclusion in the systematic review (Table (Table1 1 ).
Included studies.
Varney et al. ( 6 ) reported their experience with 62 adults with VCD who were treated with low-dose amitriptyline in conjunction with psychotherapy and behavioral therapies. The authors reported additional improvement in insomnia and anxiety symptoms in majority of the patients and the treatment was well tolerated, with only two patients reporting dry mouth as a side effect. There were some treatment failures (eight females and one male), where VCD symptoms continued despite treatment with amitriptyline. Since there were no controls in this study and a detailed psychiatric assessment was not done in these patients, the authors concluded that further studies are needed for this intervention.
Maturo et al. ( 16 ) described a cohort of 59 pediatric patients with VCD that were evaluated and treated at a multidisciplinary airway disorders clinic. Among them, 10% of the patients had a known psychiatric disorder at presentation, but after assessments 30% were noted to have psychiatric co-morbidity in their cohort. The authors reported the use of biofeedback and hypnosis and the use of reflux medications, either alone or in combination, and these were decided on the basis of individual patient characteristics. Overall, they reported a good success rate for psychiatric interventions in combination with speech therapy and/or medical therapy.
Richards-Mauzé et al. ( 17 ) recently reported the use of a four-session cognitive–behavioral therapy intervention in 36 children and adolescents with VCD. The authors have described a unique combination of cognitive–behavioral therapy in combination with diaphragmatic breathing and progressive muscle relaxation. During the first two sessions, the patients were asked to identify anxious or negative thoughts related to VCD episodes and positive coping strategies were discussed. The patients were also given an audio instruction tape for continuing progressive muscle relaxation at home on a regular basis in the first few weeks. For the third and fourth sessions, the patients jogged or ran on a treadmill while the psychologist recorded their ratings of their breathing every 2 min. The authors reported that by gradually exposing the patients to VCD symptoms and identifying and targeting the anxious thoughts related to VCD episodes, they were able to reframe these negative thoughts and teach the patients guided imagery and distraction techniques.
The authors reported significant improvement in symptom severity, perceived coping, control over breathing, and functional disability scores for all patients that underwent this intervention.
The seminal paper on VCD by Christopher et al. ( 5 ) first reported it as a functional disorder, also described the use of psychological evaluation in all the five patients that were described in that paper. All patients underwent “brief psychotherapy” and showed good response to therapy with a combination of use of breathing techniques and psychotherapy.
Freedman et al. ( 18 ) reported a small case series of three adults with VCD, who had history of childhood sexual abuse that was felt to be a significant stressor for these patients. One patient was treated with individual psychotherapy, and another was treated with anti-depressant medication but the third refused psychiatric treatment. No further details regarding the nature and outcomes of their psychiatric therapy are presented in this paper.
Anbar ( 19 ) described the outcomes for 22 patients who underwent hypnotherapy for persistent dyspnea that was refractory to medical therapy. Even though this cohort included only two patients with VCD, the paper reported good outcomes with use of hypnotherapy. Another report from the same author ( 26 ) described a single case of VCD where the diagnosis of VCD was confirmed with the help of hypnosis and the patient was subsequently treated with a combination of self-hypnotherapy and speech therapy. In a retrospective study from a single center ( 30 ), Anbar also reported a case series of patients who were treated with hypnotherapy between May 1998 and October 2000. Of the 303 patients who underwent hypnotherapy, 33 had VCD but only 29 accepted the treatment. Outcomes were reported for 22 patients, while 7 were lost to follow-up. Twenty of the 22 patients who underwent hypnotherapy reportedly had improvement in symptoms, with 11 showing complete resolution of symptoms after a single hypnotherapy session. Yet another retrospective case series of hypnotherapy reported by Anbar et al. ( 31 ) covered an 18-month period starting from January 1, 2000. A total of 133 patients were offered hypnotherapy for diagnoses ranging from anxiety, habit cough to VCD and 81 received the hypnotherapy intervention. According to the authors, 75% had a follow-up assessment and 95% of these patients reported improvement in symptoms. The authors did not provide how many VCD patients were treated with hypnotherapy and how the improvement in symptoms was assessed. Similarly, Smith ( 27 ) also reported the case of an adolescent who developed acute onset symptoms due to significant psychosocial stress and his symptoms were successfully relieved after he was taught self-hypnosis technique to relax his vocal cords during acute episodes. Caraon ( 28 ) also reported the case of an adolescent who had significant anxiety due to incessant bullying at school and developed VCD. After two sessions of hypnotherapy his symptoms improved dramatically.
Earles et al. ( 21 ) reported the use of biofeedback self-regulation in two military service members who had developed VCD symptoms during training. One case had received speech therapy intervention in addition to the authors’ use of Procomp+ system with Biograph software for biofeedback training sessions. Both cases showed resolution of VCD symptoms leading the authors to suggest the use of a multidisciplinary approach in the management of VCD patients. Another report ( 22 ) of VCD occurring in army personnel described two females who had significant VCD symptoms during times of war and detailed psychiatric assessment revealed post-traumatic stress disorder in the first patient and anxiety disorder with histrionic personality in the second case. While the first patient improved with psychotherapy, the second patient resisted therapy and continued to remain symptomatic.
Selner et al. ( 20 ) reported their experience with three cases, where significant psychological factors were operational in the form of primary and secondary gain related to somatoform disorder. Two of the three patients underwent intensive psychotherapy that was tailored to each case’s needs but the third patient refused treatment.
McQuaid et al. ( 32 ) reported a single case of VCD where the role of the pediatric psychologist in the integrated management was emphasized. This patient received behavioral therapy along with speech therapy during an inpatient stay and showed improvement after many days of initial therapy for asthma exacerbation. Similarly, Corren et al. ( 25 ) also reported the case of a 20-year old with VCD who responded to the combination of psychotherapy and speech therapy. Brown et al. ( 29 ) reported an adult with VCD along with depression and psychogenic amnesia that was treated with psychotherapy and oral desipramine therapy. Another adult with VCD reported by Thurston et al. ( 24 ) had been treated with a combination of psychotherapy and multiple medications, which included citalopram and venlafaxine and later a higher dose of venlafaxine with lithium augmentation.
Warnes et al. ( 23 ) used electromyography (EMG) related biofeedback therapy for a patient with VCD who was not responding to breathing exercises taught by a speech therapist. Similar to the description of use of biofeedback by Earles et al., this therapy required 10 weekly sessions where the patient was taught how to reduce muscle tension in laryngeal muscles using EMG signals to reinforce relaxation behaviors.
Arick-Forest et al. ( 8 ) reported the results of a prospective study of 170 adults (>18 years of age) with VCD, which included the psychological analysis of a subset of 47 newly diagnosed patients. The authors used the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) and life experiences survey (LES) to evaluate stress and found that a significant number of patients demonstrated a conversion disorder pattern ( p < 0.01). When the authors compared subjects with known psychological disorders to those without a psychological history, there was a significantly higher score on the depression and anxiety scales. Overall, roughly a quarter of their cohort had normal psychological outcomes. However, no specific psychological interventions were performed as part of the treatment strategy for these patients. Husein et al. detailed the results of psychological testing in 45 patients from the same institution, describing the use of MMPI-2 and LES, but no interventions were reported in this report.
Dietrich et al. ( 33 ) reported a retrospective analysis of 160 patients who presented to their voice disorders clinic with various voice disorders (including VCD) and the authors analyzed the distribution and frequency of perceived stress, anxiety, and depression in these patients. They reported the highest prevalence of these in the VCD patients. Even though females outnumbered males in most voice disorder categories in their cohort by a factor 4 to 6:1, the authors found that males with VCD had a much higher prevalence perceived stress, anxiety, and depression. Again no psychological interventions were reported in this retrospective study.
Gavin et al. ( 34 ) described the psychological and familial characteristics of adolescents with VCD from a multidisciplinary clinic of a single institution. The authors used several tools such as Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Assessment (CAPA), Child Behavior Checklist, Teacher Report Form, Youth Self Report, and Family Assessment Device. Based on these assessments, the authors could compare VCD patients with matched controls and found a higher prevalence of anxiety symptoms in VCD patients. No additional psychological interventions were reported in this study.
Seifert et al. ( 35 ) reported the impact of self-perception and the ability to deal with aggressiveness in VCD patients using two scales but did not report any psychological interventions. Staudenmayer ( 36 ) reported the occurrence of mass psychogenic illness in the occupants of a single office building who presented with symptoms suggestive of possible VCD. The alleged source of symptoms was reported to solvents used in membrane roof repair work but extensive environmental testing revealed no significant exposures. The authors reported significant underlying psychopathology in the occupants, but no treatment interventions were outlined in this report.
We also assessed the studies for possible bias that may affect the interpretation of the results of various psychological interventions that were used for patients with VCD. Because a majority of the reports included in the analysis were small case series or individual case reports, there is no reliable data on the effectiveness of any of the psychological interventions used. In some cases, treatments such as psychotherapy were still ongoing so there might be some attrition bias due to incomplete outcome data being available for the psychological intervention being utilized. There is also a risk of reporting bias for cases that were successfully treated that are more likely to be reported in the literature.
This systematic review focuses on the available literature regarding the use of various forms of psychological interventions for patients with VCD. Most studies have described use of individual psychotherapy, behavioral therapy, and biofeedback techniques as being effective in the treatment of associated psychological conditions in VCD patients. The duration of these interventions has also been variable and many of the cases had ongoing psychotherapy for prolonged periods of time (which was not clearly specified in most reports). The use of anti-depressant or anxiolytic medications is limited to a select few reports. While tricyclic anti-depressants such as amitriptyline were used most commonly; anti-depressants in general improved symptoms in conjunction with other behavioral/psychological interventions. None of the reported studies utilized medication treatment alone. Hypnotherapy has also been effective in many patients although its availability is limited due to the paucity of trained individuals who can successfully use this modality for VCD patients. While the use of breathing techniques (such as diaphragmatic breathing or relaxed throat breathing) has been universally applied for VCD patients with the help of a speech and language pathologist at most centers, the need for psychological evaluation and intervention has been determined on a case-by-case basis. In fact, many centers have an individualized approach for the management of each patient and most centers do not have a psychologist available to evaluate these patients in conjunction with the ENT or pulmonary physicians that usually treat these patients. The creation of specialized multidisciplinary teams or clinics for VCD as described by Maturo et al. ( 16 ) can be helpful in creating a standardized approach for the management of VCD patients. At these centers, the effectiveness of various approaches can then be evaluated in a prospective manner with the help of all the specialists involved in assessment and management of VCD patients.
The evidence regarding the use of psychological interventions in patients with VCD is limited to only small case series and case reports, and there are no prospective studies that have used a standard psychological intervention or tried to assess the effectiveness of one approach over another in these patients. The quality of the evidence available is also limited, as there are no large randomized controlled trials or multicenter studies. Most case series were single-center experiences that provide limited evidence regarding the effectiveness of these interventions. Another drawback is the limited evidence for usefulness of psychological interventions for pediatric cases of VCD as compared to that for adult patients. Most cases receive a combination of several interventions, as summarized in Table Table2. 2 . This makes it more difficult to evaluate whether the improvement seen in patients’ symptoms can be attributed to any one particular intervention.
Use of different treatment modalities in patients with VCD undergoing psychological interventions .
Reference | Speech Therapy | Psychotherapy | Medications – Anti-depressants | Medications – Anxiolytics | Hypnotherapy | Cognitive–behavioral therapy | Biofeedback | Others |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Varney et al. ( ) | ||||||||
Maturo et al. ( ) | Anti-reflux therapy, botulinum toxin | |||||||
Richards-Mauze et al. ( ) | ||||||||
Freedman et al. ( ) | ||||||||
Anbar ( ) | ||||||||
Christopher et al. ( ) | ||||||||
Selner et al. ( ) | ||||||||
Earles et al. ( ) | ||||||||
Craig et al. ( ) | ||||||||
Warnes et al. ( ) | ||||||||
Thurston et al. ( ) | ||||||||
Corren et al. ( ) | Heliox | |||||||
Anbar et al. ( ) | ||||||||
Smith et al. ( ) | ||||||||
Caraon et al. ( ) | ||||||||
bROWN et al. ( ) |
*Not all patients in this study received this intervention .
There have been additional systematic reviews evaluating the usefulness of psychological interventions for adults ( 37 ) and children with asthma ( 38 ). Additional reviews of therapies available for dyspnea in patients with various other lung disorders have also included several pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions ( 39 ). Psychological interventions like hypnosis, biofeedback, psychotherapy, and cognitive–behavioral therapy have been found to be very useful in symptom reduction and in improving the overall outcome in these pulmonary disorders with significant psychological contribution, as in VCD. Similar approaches as that used for VCD patients have also been utilized in the treatment of psychiatric disorders with somatic manifestations like conversion disorders ( 40 ) and somatoform disorders ( 41 ). Because the prevalence of psychological co-morbidity in patients with VCD has been reported to be as high as 75% ( 24 ), it is essential to carefully evaluate these interventions so that the most the effective approaches can be adopted for the management of patients with VCD.
Although the authors made every possible attempt to find all published studies pertaining to psychological interventions for VCD/PVFM, it is possible that some studies may have been missed. There have been no other systematic reviews on the role of psychological interventions for VCD patients to the best of our knowledge. Most reviews of VCD/PVFM that have discussed treatment approaches for this condition have recommended referral for psychological interventions in most patients.
Based on the limited data available from retrospective case series and case reports, we conclude that psychological interventions do have a role to play in the management of adult and pediatric patients with VCD. There is no uniform approach that can be applied for all patients and psychological assessment, and intervention is individualized based on each patient’s characteristics. Further studies for validating the use of standardized approaches for treatment of VCD-associated psychopathology are needed.
Loveleen Guglani wrote the manuscript and performed the literature searches. Sarah Atkinson compiled the references for the systematic review and extracted the data from the individual studies. Avinash Hosanagar edited the manuscript. Lokesh Guglani initiated this systematic review, performed the literature review, and also helped to write and edit the manuscript.
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The authors would like to acknowledge the help of the library staff at Shiffman Medical Library at Wayne State University in collecting all the studies that were included in this review.
1 Division of Pulmonary Medicine, The Carman and Ann Adams Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital of Michigan, Detroit, MI, USA.
Take a quiz to find out what's causing your slurred speech.
Take slurred speech quiz
Slurred speech is when you have trouble speaking, your words are slow or garbled, or your words run together. When you talk, many components of your nervous system work together to form words. When these parts don’t work correctly, your speech can become distorted, or “slurred.” The medical term for slurred speech is dysarthria.
Slurred speech includes problems pronouncing words and regulating the speed or pace of your speech. It can range from a barely noticeable problem to one that’s so severe that others can’t understand what you’re saying.
People often describe slurred speech as feeling like you’re trying to talk with your mouth full of marbles.
Common causes of slurred or slow speech include drinking too much alcohol and not getting enough sleep. In these cases, the slurring will stop once you’re sober again and have gotten rest, respectively.
There are also other causes of slurred speech such as a stroke (a medical emergency), brain tumor, Bell’s palsy, or a serious migraine.
Does slurred speech always need to be treated?
"People often think slurred speech is a minor symptom that does not need a medical evaluation. As our speech and ability to speak is our main form of communication, it is important to look for correctable causes." — Dr. Karen Hoerst
You should call 911 if:
A stroke occurs in the brain because the blow flow in a blood vessel is blocked. It can also happen when a blood vessel ruptures or leaks. This affects the blood supply to parts of the brain, which leads long-term damage. If it affects the area of the brain responsible for speech, it can cause slurred speech.
A transient ischemic attack , or TIA, is sometimes called a "mini stroke." A TIA is a temporary interruption of blood flow that causes the same symptoms as a stroke, but improves without any permanent damage to the brain or symptoms.
For example, if you have slurred speech because of a TIA, once the blood flow is restored to that area of the brain, the slurred speech goes away. But people who have a TIA are at a high risk of having a stroke in the future, especially if their risk factors are not treated. Risk factors are the same for stroke and TIA and include smoking, obesity, and cardiovascular disease.
It’s extremely important to call 911 right away if you suddenly have slurred speech. Getting immediate treatment is critical to minimizing permanent damage. Paramedics can begin treating you in the ambulance on the way to the hospital, so it’s better to call 911 than go to the ER yourself.
Treatments for strokes and TIAs include medications to break up blood clots and surgery to remove blood clots from the vessels. If your stroke is from bleeding in the brain, you may need surgery to repair a blood vessel.
Following treatment, your doctor will recommend medications to prevent another TIA or stroke. These typically include drugs that prevent clots from forming in the blood (like aspirin or other blood thinners) and cholesterol medication to prevent plaque from building up on the walls of the blood vessels. You may also need to take medication to control your blood pressure.
Speech therapy is recommended to help treat problems with speech.
It may not be a stroke
"There are so many possible causes of slurred speech. Most of the time we need a detailed history and physical exam to guide the diagnosis and treatment." — Dr. Hoerst
Bell’s palsy is a relatively common condition that affects the facial nerve, which is responsible for movement of your face.
In Bell’s palsy, the nerve gets inflamed typically because of a recent viral infection. This inflammation can cause the facial nerve to not work as well, leading to drooping and slurred speech.
Bell’s palsy usually improves in a few months, but medications such as steroids and antiviral drugs are typically given to help speed the process. If nerve problems continue, physical therapy is recommended. In rare instances, surgery may be needed to help improve facial muscle function.
A brain tumor is an abnormal growth of cells in the brain. A brain tumor may be cancerous (malignant) or noncancerous (benign). Both types can cause symptoms including slurred speech.
The diagnosis of a tumor in the brain or spinal cord is based on an exam and imaging of the brain, such as an MRI or CT scan. A biopsy (tissue sample) may be needed to determine what type of tumor it is.
Some tumors, such as a small noncancerous tumor, do not need treatment, though your doctor will recommend periodic MRI scans to make sure it hasn’t changed.
Most larger or cancerous tumors do require treatment, which may consist of chemotherapy, radiation, or surgery. If you develop physical or cognitive (mental) problems from the tumor, rehabilitation such as physical therapy, occupational therapy, or speech therapy may be needed.
Multiple sclerosis, or MS, is a central-nervous system disease that affects the cells of the brain and spinal cord. In MS, a fatty tissue that surrounds nerve fibers (myelin) is attacked. Myelin helps to insulate the electrical signals sent through the nerves. When there is a problem with this fatty tissue, information sent to and from the brain can be disrupted.
MS is most common in young adults between the ages of 20 and 50, according to the National MS Society .
MS is not curable , but treatments have dramatically improved the ability to control MS, so people usually have fewer symptoms and less disability.
Treatment includes medications that may be taken orally or injected or infused through an IV line. Physical therapy and speech therapy are commonly used to help in physical recovery, and medications can be used to treat other symptoms, such as depression, pain, and fatigue.
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is also known as Lou Gehrig’s disease. It affects nerve cells called motor neurons that control your movement.
The disease primarily causes a loss of strength, impaired swallowing and speech, and in most cases, difficulty breathing because of impaired respiratory muscles. It is a progressive disease, meaning that symptoms are mild at first and worsen over time.
Previously, it was thought that ALS doesn’t affect a person’s mental ability. But it’s now known that people with ALS can get a specific type of dementia called frontotemporal dementia (FTD). That condition can affect behavior, mood, and speech.
Symptoms of ALS can develop in adults of any age, but it’s most commonly diagnosed in people who are between the ages of 40 and 70, according to the ALS Association .
While there are some medications that can be used to delay the progression of the disease, there is currently no cure for ALS. Treatment includes rehabilitation with physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech therapy, and respiratory therapy.
A migraine causes a severe headache that is often accompanied by nausea and sensitivity to light or sound. But some migraines don’t cause head pain.
Other symptoms that involve the nervous system can occur. Some of these sensory symptoms are called “auras.” These distortions can cause visual changes , including flashing lights or distorted vision. People may feel tingling or numbness of their face, arm, or leg.
In some types of migraine, people may even develop slurred speech and weakness of the face, arm, or leg. These are also symptoms of a stroke, so it may be hard to figure out which condition you have. If you develop sudden slurred speech or weakness, go to the ER immediately.
In an acute migraine attack, medications can be used to stop a migraine that has already started, such as triptans or newer medications called CGRP inhibitors. These medications can be in pill form, inhaled form, or injectable medications.
Migraine prevention can include taking medications for blood pressure, anticonvulsants, or even antidepressants. In some instances, Botox treatments are used to prevent migraine.
Behavior and lifestyle changes such as exercise, improved sleep, and healthy diet or weight loss are also often recommended to help decrease the number of migraine headaches you experience.
Slurred speech may occur from alcohol intoxication or tiredness. It can also be a side effect of medications like high dose pain medications, antipsychotic medications or even some allergy medications like antihistamines. Other causes include:
"Early speech therapy can not only help with early improvement but also with diagnosis. Speech-language pathologists have special training in detecting the various types of slurred speech, which helps to determine the possible causes."— Dr. Hoerst
While it's important to follow your healthcare provider's guidance, here are some over-the-counter (OTC) options that might provide extra support.
Required field
Was this article helpful?
Learn About the 50 Essential Biomakers that Determine Your Health, Energy, and Lifespan
Neurological disorders and slurred speech.
Medications and Slurred Speech
Stroke and slurred speech.
Traumatic Brain Injury and Slurred Speech
Slurred speech refers to a condition where an individual’s speech becomes unclear, difficult to understand, or distorted. There are various causes that can contribute to slurred speech, ranging from temporary conditions to more serious underlying health issues. Understanding these causes is crucial in order to identify and address the underlying problem. In this article, we will explore six common causes of slurred speech, shedding light on why individuals may experience difficulty in their speech.
Slurred speech, also known as dysarthria, is a condition that affects the ability to articulate words clearly and smoothly. It can be caused by various factors, including neurological disorders. Understanding the causes of slurred speech is crucial in order to seek appropriate medical attention and treatment. In this article, we will explore six common causes of slurred speech related to neurological disorders.
One of the primary causes of slurred speech is a stroke. When a stroke occurs, blood flow to the brain is disrupted, leading to damage in certain areas responsible for speech production. This damage can result in slurred speech, as well as other communication difficulties. It is important to seek immediate medical attention if you experience sudden slurred speech, as a stroke requires urgent treatment.
Another neurological disorder that can cause slurred speech is multiple sclerosis (MS). MS is a chronic condition that affects the central nervous system, including the brain and spinal cord. As the protective covering of nerve fibers is damaged, communication between the brain and the rest of the body is disrupted. This can lead to slurred speech, among other symptoms such as fatigue and muscle weakness.
Parkinson’s disease is yet another neurological disorder associated with slurred speech. This progressive condition affects the nervous system, particularly the part responsible for controlling movement. As the disease progresses, muscles involved in speech production can become stiff and rigid, resulting in slurred speech. Other symptoms of Parkinson’s disease include tremors, balance problems, and muscle stiffness.
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), also known as Lou Gehrig’s disease, is a degenerative disorder that affects nerve cells in the brain and spinal cord. As the disease progresses, the muscles responsible for speech become weaker and less coordinated, leading to slurred speech. ALS is a progressive condition with no known cure, so treatment focuses on managing symptoms and improving quality of life.
Huntington’s disease is a genetic disorder that causes the progressive breakdown of nerve cells in the brain. This breakdown affects movement, cognition, and behavior. As the disease advances, individuals may experience slurred speech due to the deterioration of the muscles involved in speech production. Other symptoms of Huntington’s disease include involuntary movements, difficulty swallowing, and cognitive decline.
Lastly, a brain tumor can also cause slurred speech. Tumors in the brain can disrupt the normal functioning of brain cells, leading to various symptoms, including slurred speech. The specific location of the tumor determines which areas of the brain are affected and the resulting symptoms. Prompt medical evaluation is crucial if you experience persistent slurred speech, as brain tumors require specialized treatment.
In conclusion, slurred speech can be caused by various neurological disorders. Stroke, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease, ALS, Huntington’s disease, and brain tumors are all potential causes of slurred speech. If you or someone you know experiences persistent slurred speech, it is important to seek medical attention to determine the underlying cause and receive appropriate treatment. Early intervention can help manage symptoms and improve quality of life for individuals with slurred speech.
Slurred speech can be a distressing symptom that affects individuals of all ages. It can make communication difficult and lead to feelings of frustration and embarrassment. While there are various causes of slurred speech, one potential culprit is the use of certain medications. In this article, we will explore six common medications that may contribute to slurred speech.
1. Sedatives and tranquilizers: Sedatives and tranquilizers are commonly prescribed to treat anxiety, insomnia, and certain neurological conditions. These medications work by depressing the central nervous system, which can result in slowed speech and impaired coordination. Examples of sedatives and tranquilizers include benzodiazepines like diazepam and lorazepam.
2. Antipsychotics: Antipsychotic medications are often prescribed to manage conditions such as schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. While they can be highly effective in treating these conditions, they may also cause side effects such as slurred speech. This is because antipsychotics affect the dopamine receptors in the brain, which can impact speech production. Common antipsychotics include risperidone and olanzapine.
3. Muscle relaxants: Muscle relaxants are commonly prescribed to alleviate muscle spasms and stiffness associated with conditions like multiple sclerosis and fibromyalgia. These medications work by reducing muscle tone, but they can also affect the muscles responsible for speech production. As a result, slurred speech may occur as a side effect. Examples of muscle relaxants include baclofen and cyclobenzaprine.
4. Anticonvulsants: Anticonvulsant medications are primarily used to manage seizures in individuals with epilepsy. However, they may also be prescribed for other conditions such as neuropathic pain and mood disorders. While anticonvulsants are generally well-tolerated, they can cause side effects such as slurred speech. This is thought to be due to their impact on the central nervous system. Common anticonvulsants include carbamazepine and valproic acid.
5. Opioids: Opioids are powerful pain medications that are commonly prescribed for acute and chronic pain management. While they can provide much-needed relief, they also come with a range of side effects, including slurred speech. Opioids work by binding to opioid receptors in the brain, which can affect speech production and coordination. Examples of opioids include oxycodone and morphine.
6. Antihistamines: Antihistamines are commonly used to manage allergies and cold symptoms. While they are generally safe and well-tolerated, some antihistamines can cause drowsiness and sedation, which may result in slurred speech. This is particularly true for first-generation antihistamines such as diphenhydramine and chlorpheniramine.
It is important to note that not everyone who takes these medications will experience slurred speech. The occurrence and severity of this side effect can vary from person to person. If you are experiencing slurred speech while taking any of these medications, it is crucial to consult with your healthcare provider. They can evaluate your symptoms, review your medication regimen, and make any necessary adjustments to ensure your safety and well-being.
In conclusion, medications can sometimes be the cause of slurred speech. Sedatives, antipsychotics, muscle relaxants, anticonvulsants, opioids, and antihistamines are all examples of medications that may contribute to this symptom. If you are experiencing slurred speech while taking any of these medications, it is important to seek medical advice to determine the best course of action. Your healthcare provider can help identify the underlying cause and explore alternative treatment options if necessary.
Alcohol is a depressant that affects the central nervous system, including the brain. When consumed in excessive amounts, alcohol can impair the functioning of the brain, leading to slurred speech. This occurs because alcohol affects the muscles responsible for speech production, causing them to become weak and uncoordinated.
Another factor that contributes to slurred speech is the impact of alcohol on the brain’s communication pathways. Alcohol interferes with the transmission of signals between different parts of the brain, including those involved in speech production. As a result, the coordination required for clear and precise speech is compromised, leading to slurring of words.
Furthermore, alcohol can also affect the muscles of the tongue and lips, which are crucial for articulating sounds correctly. These muscles may become relaxed and less responsive under the influence of alcohol, making it difficult to form words accurately. This relaxation of the muscles can also lead to a slower rate of speech, further contributing to slurred speech.
In addition to the direct effects of alcohol on speech production, alcohol intoxication can also impair cognitive functions. Alcohol affects the brain’s ability to process information and make decisions, which can impact speech clarity. Individuals under the influence of alcohol may struggle to find the right words or maintain a coherent train of thought, resulting in slurred speech.
Moreover, alcohol can cause dehydration, which can further exacerbate slurred speech. Dehydration affects the vocal cords and the mucous membranes in the mouth and throat, making it harder to produce clear speech. Dryness in these areas can lead to a hoarse or raspy voice, adding to the slurring effect.
Lastly, alcohol can also affect an individual’s balance and coordination, which can indirectly contribute to slurred speech. When a person’s motor skills are impaired, they may have difficulty controlling the muscles required for speech production. This lack of coordination can result in slurred speech as the individual struggles to articulate words accurately.
In conclusion, alcohol consumption can lead to slurred speech due to its effects on the central nervous system, muscle coordination, cognitive functions, dehydration, and motor skills. It is important to note that slurred speech caused by alcohol is temporary and typically resolves once the effects of alcohol wear off. However, chronic alcohol abuse can lead to long-term damage to the brain and speech-related functions. If you or someone you know experiences persistent slurred speech, it is essential to seek medical attention to determine the underlying cause and receive appropriate treatment.
Slurred speech is a condition that affects the clarity and articulation of one’s speech. It can be a symptom of various underlying causes, ranging from temporary issues to more serious medical conditions. Understanding the potential causes of slurred speech is crucial in order to seek appropriate treatment and address any underlying health concerns.
One common cause of slurred speech is stroke. When a stroke occurs, blood flow to the brain is disrupted, leading to damage in certain areas responsible for speech production. This damage can result in slurred speech, as well as other symptoms such as weakness or numbness on one side of the body. If you experience sudden slurred speech along with these other symptoms, it is important to seek immediate medical attention, as stroke is a medical emergency.
Another potential cause of slurred speech is alcohol or drug intoxication. When under the influence of alcohol or certain drugs, the central nervous system is affected, leading to impaired coordination and muscle control, including the muscles involved in speech production. This can result in slurred speech, as well as other signs of intoxication such as unsteady gait or altered mental state. It is important to remember that driving or operating machinery while under the influence can have serious consequences, not only for yourself but also for others.
Certain medical conditions can also cause slurred speech. One such condition is multiple sclerosis (MS), a chronic autoimmune disease that affects the central nervous system. In MS, the protective covering of nerve fibers in the brain and spinal cord is damaged, leading to a wide range of symptoms, including slurred speech. Other neurological conditions, such as Parkinson’s disease or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), can also cause slurred speech due to the progressive degeneration of nerve cells involved in speech production.
In some cases, slurred speech may be a side effect of medication. Certain medications, such as muscle relaxants or sedatives, can affect muscle control and coordination, leading to slurred speech. If you notice slurred speech after starting a new medication, it is important to consult with your healthcare provider to determine if the medication is the cause and discuss potential alternatives.
Additionally, slurred speech can be a symptom of a transient ischemic attack (TIA), also known as a mini-stroke. A TIA is a temporary disruption of blood flow to the brain, often caused by a blood clot. While the symptoms of a TIA are similar to those of a stroke, they typically resolve within a short period of time. However, a TIA should not be ignored, as it can be a warning sign of an impending stroke.
Lastly, slurred speech can be a result of a traumatic brain injury (TBI). When the brain experiences a sudden impact, such as in a car accident or a fall, it can lead to damage in the areas responsible for speech production. Depending on the severity of the injury, slurred speech may be temporary or long-lasting.
In conclusion, slurred speech can have various causes, ranging from temporary issues such as alcohol intoxication to more serious medical conditions like stroke or multiple sclerosis. Recognizing the potential causes of slurred speech is essential in order to seek appropriate medical attention and address any underlying health concerns. If you or someone you know experiences slurred speech, especially when accompanied by other concerning symptoms, it is important to consult with a healthcare professional for a proper evaluation and diagnosis.
Slurred speech can be a distressing symptom that affects individuals who have experienced a traumatic brain injury (TBI). This condition can significantly impact a person’s ability to communicate effectively, leading to frustration and difficulties in daily life. Understanding the causes of slurred speech in individuals with TBI is crucial for both patients and healthcare professionals. In this article, we will explore six common causes of slurred speech in individuals with traumatic brain injury.
1. Muscle Weakness and Paralysis
One of the primary causes of slurred speech in individuals with TBI is muscle weakness and paralysis. When the brain sustains an injury, it can affect the nerves that control the muscles responsible for speech production. As a result, the affected individual may experience difficulty in coordinating the movements required for clear speech, leading to slurring of words.
2. Damage to the Speech Centers in the Brain
Another cause of slurred speech in individuals with TBI is damage to the speech centers in the brain. These speech centers, located in the left hemisphere of the brain, are responsible for controlling the muscles involved in speech production. When these areas are damaged, it can result in slurred speech as the brain struggles to send the appropriate signals to the muscles.
3. Cognitive Impairments
Cognitive impairments, such as difficulties with attention, memory, and problem-solving, are common after a traumatic brain injury. These impairments can also contribute to slurred speech. Individuals with TBI may struggle to find the right words or organize their thoughts, leading to hesitations and slurring of speech as they try to express themselves.
4. Swelling and Inflammation
Following a traumatic brain injury, the brain often experiences swelling and inflammation as part of the body’s natural response to injury. This swelling can put pressure on the surrounding brain tissue, including the areas responsible for speech production. As a result, slurred speech may occur due to the physical compression of these vital speech centers.
5. Damage to the Cranial Nerves
The cranial nerves play a crucial role in controlling various functions, including speech. A traumatic brain injury can damage these nerves, leading to slurred speech. The cranial nerves involved in speech production include the facial nerve, which controls the muscles of the face and mouth, and the hypoglossal nerve, responsible for controlling the tongue’s movements. Damage to these nerves can result in difficulties with articulation and pronunciation, leading to slurred speech.
6. Medications and Treatments
Lastly, certain medications and treatments used to manage the symptoms of traumatic brain injury can also contribute to slurred speech. For example, muscle relaxants prescribed to reduce muscle spasms and stiffness can affect the coordination of speech muscles, resulting in slurring. Additionally, sedatives and pain medications may also have side effects that impact speech clarity.
In conclusion, slurred speech is a common symptom experienced by individuals with traumatic brain injury. Muscle weakness and paralysis, damage to the speech centers in the brain, cognitive impairments, swelling and inflammation, damage to the cranial nerves, and certain medications and treatments can all contribute to this speech difficulty. Understanding these causes is essential for healthcare professionals to develop appropriate treatment plans and for individuals with TBI to seek the necessary support and interventions to improve their speech and overall quality of life.
1. What are the common causes of slurred speech? The common causes of slurred speech include stroke, brain injury, neurological disorders, alcohol or drug intoxication, medication side effects, and certain medical conditions.
2. How does a stroke cause slurred speech? A stroke can cause slurred speech by affecting the brain’s ability to control the muscles involved in speech production.
3. What types of brain injuries can lead to slurred speech? Brain injuries such as traumatic brain injury (TBI) or brain tumors can disrupt the normal functioning of the brain, leading to slurred speech.
4. Which neurological disorders can cause slurred speech? Neurological disorders like multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) can result in slurred speech due to the damage they cause to the nerves and muscles involved in speech.
5. Can medication side effects cause slurred speech? Yes, certain medications, such as sedatives, muscle relaxants, and antipsychotics, can have side effects that include slurred speech.In conclusion, there are several potential causes of slurred speech, including neurological conditions, medication side effects, alcohol or drug use, stroke or brain injury, fatigue or exhaustion, and certain medical conditions. It is important to consult with a healthcare professional for a proper diagnosis and appropriate treatment if you are experiencing slurred speech.
Hi, I’m Pablo Garduno. I am a biohacking enthusiast, and Head Writer of SanDiegoHealth.org. I write the majority of the content on this site, and appreciate you taking the time to read my work.
Best Nootropics | Best MCT Oil | Best Energy Pills | Ozempic Alternatives | Adderall Alternatives | Best Prebiotics | Best Caffeine Pills
Sitemap | Privacy Policy
View All Portal Topics
The scope of this page focuses on voice disorders of organic, functional, and psychogenic origin(s).
See the Voice Evidence Map for pertinent scientific evidence, expert opinion, and client/caregiver perspective.
For information on gender-affirming voice services, see ASHA’s Practice Portal page on Gender Affirming Voice and Communication .
A voice disorder occurs when voice quality, pitch, and loudness differ or are inappropriate for an individual’s age, gender, cultural background, or geographic location (Aronson & Bless, 2009; Boone et al., 2010; Lee et al., 2004). A voice disorder is present when an individual expresses concern about having an abnormal voice that does not meet daily needs—even if others do not perceive it as different or deviant (American Speech-Language-Hearing Association [ASHA], 1993; Colton & Casper, 2011; Stemple et al., 2010; Verdolini & Ramig, 2001).
For the purposes of this document, voice disorders are categorized as follows:
Voice quality can also be affected when psychological stressors lead to habitual, maladaptive aphonia or dysphonia. The resulting voice disorders are referred to as psychogenic voice disorders or psychogenic conversion aphonia/dysphonia (Stemple et al., 2010). These voice disorders are rare. Speech-language pathologists (SLPs) may refer individuals suspected of having a psychogenic voice disorder to other appropriate professionals (e.g., psychologist and/or psychiatrist) for diagnosis and may collaborate in subsequent behavioral treatment.
The complementary relationships among these organic, functional, and psychogenic influences ensure that many voice disorders will have contributions from more than one etiologic factor (Stemple et al., 2014; Verdolini et al., 2006). For example, vocal fold nodules may result from behavioral voice misuse (functional etiology). However, the voice misuse results in repeated trauma to the vocal folds, which may then lead to structural (organic) changes to the vocal fold tissue.
SLPs may also be involved in the assessment and treatment of disorders that affect the laryngeal mechanism (i.e., the aerodigestive tract) and that are not classified as voice disorders, such as the following:
For further information, see ASHA’s Practice Portal page on Aerodigestive Disorders .
Incidence of voice disorders refers to the number of new cases identified in a specific time period.
Prevalence refers to the number of individuals who are living with voice disorders in a given time period.
Estimates of incidence and prevalence vary due to a number of factors, including etiology, age, gender, and occupation.
In the pediatric population, the reported prevalence of a voice disorder has ranged from 1.4% to 6.0% (Black et al., 2015; Carding et al., 2006). Longer stays in the neonatal intensive care unit and prolonged intubation (more than 28 days) were associated with more severe dysphonia in premature infants (Hseu et al., 2018). An estimated range of 41%–73% of children were identified with vocal nodules, indicating vocal nodules as a predominant cause of pediatric dysphonia (Martins et al., 2015); however, there can be a variety of causes other than vocal fold nodules that result in dysphonia in the pediatric population. Rates indicated no statistically significant differences across race in preschool-aged children (Duff et al., 2004).
Approximately one out of 13 adults in the United States will experience a voice problem annually, but only a relative minority seek treatment (10%; Bhattacharyya, 2014). The rate of young adults (aged 24–34 years) with voice disorders was estimated to be 6%, with no significant difference across age groups, race/ethnicity, or education levels (Bainbridge et al., 2017). Prevalence was reported to be higher in adults aged 60 years and older, with estimates ranging from 4.8% to 29.1% in population-based studies (de Araújo Pernambuco et al., 2014).
Among adults (between 19 and 60 years of age) with a voice disorder, the most frequent diagnoses included functional dysphonia (20.5%), acid laryngitis (12.5%), and vocal polyps (12%; Martins et al., 2015).
Of individuals over the age of 60 years who had been evaluated for vocal problems, voice disorders were most commonly associated with presbyphonia (changes associated with aging voice), reflux/inflammation, functional dysphonia, vocal fold paralysis/paresis, and Reinke’s edema (Martins et al., 2015). Laryngeal cancer diagnoses were reported to have peaked in adults between 75 and 79 years of age and decreased thereafter (Roy et al., 2016).
Studies reported results based on gender; however, there were no indications whether the data collected were based on sex assigned at birth and/or gender identity. Voice disorders were reported to be significantly more prevalent in male children than in female children (Carding et al., 2006; Martins et al., 2015). In adulthood, however, prevalence was higher in female adults than in male adults, with a reported ratio of 1.5:1.0 (Martins et al., 2015; Roy et al., 2005).
Although female adults more frequently received diagnoses of dysphonia with no specific cause noted, male adults were more frequently diagnosed with chronic laryngitis (Cohen et al., 2012). Also, after the age of 40 years, male adults had higher prevalence rates of laryngeal cancer than female adults (Cohen et al., 2012).
Teachers were estimated to be two to three times more likely than the general population to develop a voice disorder (Martins et al., 2014). Certain factors, such as number of classes per week, noise generated outside of the school setting, and volume of voice while lecturing, were indicated to increase the risk of teachers developing a voice disorder (Byeon, 2019).
The mean prevalence of voice disorders was estimated to be 46% among singers (Pestana et al., 2017). The most prevalent laryngeal pathologies and voice disorder symptoms reported in singers included, but were not limited to, Reinke’s edema, polyps, gastroesophageal reflux disease, laryngeal pain, and hoarseness; however, risk of developing laryngeal pathologies or vocal cord symptoms may vary based on differences in singing style and genre (Kwok & Eslick, 2019).
According to a claims-based study, almost 30% of dysphonia claims were individuals in the service industry. Those in the service industry were estimated to be 2.6 times more likely to develop benign laryngeal growth and individuals in the manufacturing industry were estimated to be 1.4 times more likely to develop malignant laryngeal growth compared to the general population (Benninger et al., 2017).
The term dysphonia encompasses the auditory-perceptual symptoms of voice disorders. Dysphonia is characterized by altered vocal quality, pitch, loudness, or vocal effort.
Perceptual signs and symptoms of dysphonia include
Other signs and symptoms include
Signs and symptoms can occur in isolation or in combination. As treatment progresses, some may dissipate, and others may emerge as compensatory strategies are eliminated.
Auditory-perceptual quality of voice in individuals with voice disorders can vary depending on the type and severity of the disorder, the size and site of the lesion (if present), and the individual’s compensatory responses. The severity of the voice disorder cannot always be determined by auditory-perceptual voice quality alone. Therefore, further instrumental assessment may be indicated to determine the severity and/or etiology of a voice disorder.
Normal voice production depends on power and airflow supplied by
A disturbance in one of these subsystems or in the physiological balance among the systems may lead to or contribute to a voice disorder. Disruptions can be due to organic, functional, and/or psychogenic causes.
Organic causes include the following:
Functional causes include the following:
Psychogenic causes include the following:
Making modifications to pitch without the guidance of a skilled service provider is not recommended and may result in vocal misuse. However, voice services may be provided to assist with appropriate pitch modifications.
Recognizing associations among these factors, along with patient history, may help in identifying the possible causes of the voice disorder. Even when an obvious cause is identified and treated, the voice problem may persist. For example, an upper respiratory infection could be the cause of the dysphonia, but poor or inefficient compensatory techniques may cause dysphonia to persist, even when the infection has been successfully treated.
SLPs play a central role in the assessment, diagnosis, and treatment of voice disorders. The professional roles and activities in speech-language pathology include the following:
SLPs are trained to evaluate voice use and function to determine the cause of reported symptoms and select treatment methods for improving voice production.
Appropriate roles for SLPs include the following:
As indicated in the ASHA Code of Ethics (ASHA, 2023), SLPs who serve this population should be specifically educated and appropriately trained to do so.
See the Assessment section of the Voice Evidence Map for pertinent scientific evidence, expert opinion, and client/caregiver perspective.
Screening may be conducted if a voice disorder is suspected. It may be triggered by concerns from individuals, parents, teachers, or health care providers. When deviations from normal voice are detected during screening, further evaluation is warranted.
Screening includes evaluation of vocal characteristics related to
Clinicians may use a formal screening tool (Lee et al., 2004) or obtain data using informal tasks. Standardized self-report questionnaires can be included for a more thorough screening (e.g., Deary et al., 2003; Hogikyan & Sethuraman, 1999; Jacobson et al., 1997).
All patients/clients with voice disorders should be examined by a physician, preferably in a discipline appropriate to the presenting complaint. The physician’s examination may occur before or after the voice evaluation by the SLP. Consultation with an otolaryngologist can be important, particularly in the case that an SLP does not have access to instrumentation for evaluation. Assessment and treatment of voice disorders may require use of appropriate personal protective equipment .
A comprehensive assessment is conducted for individuals suspected of having a voice disorder, using both standardized and nonstandardized measures (see ASHA’s resource on assessment tools, techniques, and data sources ). For a review of clinical voice assessments, see Roy et al. (2013).
Diagnostic therapy may be performed as part of the comprehensive assessment to help in making a diagnosis and to determine if the individual is stimulable to voice therapy efforts.
Comprehensive assessment is conducted to identify and describe
See ASHA’s resource titled person-centered focus on function: voice [PDF] for an example of assessment data.
Case history.
This subjective assessment is based on the clinical impressions of the SLP during production of sustained vowels, sentences, and running speech.
The perceptual features above are defined in ASHA’s Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice ( CAPE-V ; ASHA, n.d., 2002; Kempster et al., 2009).
See ASHA’s Practice Portal page on Resonance Disorders .
Rate of speech may be indirectly impacted by voice disorders. For instance, a patient with a voice disorder may deliberately slow rate of speech to compensate for a voice disorder and increase intelligibility. For reasons such as these, an SLP may consider assessment of rate of speech (e.g., via diadochokinetic rate assessment).
Physicians are the only professionals qualified and licensed to render medical diagnoses related to the identification of laryngeal pathology as it affects voice. Imaging should be viewed and interpreted by an otolaryngologist with training in this procedure when it is used for medical diagnostic purposes.
Laryngeal Imaging
Measures of structure and gross function (using videoendoscopy) and measures of vocal fold vibration during phonation (using videostroboscopy). Please see ASHA’s resource on Vocal Tract Visualization and Imaging for more information.
Acoustic Assessment
Objective measures of vocal function related to vocal loudness, pitch, and quality (Patel et al., 2018).
Aerodynamic Assessment
Measures (using noninvasive procedures) of glottal aerodynamic parameters required for phonation.
SLPs should be aware of potential sources of error or impediments to recording quality during aerodynamic assessment. Sources of error may contribute to inaccurate data. These error sources include
Although many of the same voice disorders may exist among children and adults, the following conditions tend to be unique to the pediatric population (Sapienza & Ruddy, 2009):
Further information regarding laryngomalacia and laryngeal cleft may be found in ASHA’s Practice Portal page on Aerodigestive Disorders .
See the Treatment section of the Voice Evidence Map for pertinent scientific evidence, expert opinion, and client/caregiver perspective.
Intervention is conducted to achieve improved voice production and coordination of respiration and laryngeal valving. The ASHA Practice Portal page on Head and Neck Cancer addresses intervention aimed at acquisition of alaryngeal speech sufficient to allow for functional oral communication.
Intervention is designed to
Voice use within different settings should be considered when determining vocal needs and establishing goals. For example, vocal needs within the workplace may be different from those within the community (e.g., home and social settings).
SLPs often team with otolaryngologists/laryngologists and other medical professionals (e.g., pulmonologists, gastroenterologists, neurologists, allergists, endocrinologists, and occupational medicine physicians) and, if appropriate, develop treatment plans to support the medical plan and to optimize outcomes. Collaboration with otolaryngologists/laryngologists is especially important to rule in or rule out underlying pathologies. SLPs can only diagnose functional abnormalities, and only otolaryngologists can diagnose organic pathologies (e.g., nodules, polyps, tumors).
Some individuals develop voice disorders in the absence of structural pathology (e.g., functional aphonia, muscle tension dysphonia, and mutational/functional falsetto) and may benefit from psychological counseling in addition to what can be provided by the SLP. Counseling, direct manipulation of the voice, and use of interview questions can be used to probe possible factors contributing to the voice problem. SLPs refer the individual to the appropriate health care professional(s) to address issues outside the SLP’s scope of practice (ASHA, 2016).
See ASHA’s resources on collaboration and teaming and interprofessional education/interprofessional practice (IPE/IPP) .
Approaches can be direct or indirect, and SLPs often incorporate aspects of more than one therapeutic approach in developing a treatment plan.
Direct approaches focus on manipulating the voice-producing mechanisms (phonation, respiration, and musculoskeletal function) to modify vocal behaviors and establish healthy voice production (Colton & Casper, 2011; Stemple, 2000).
Indirect approaches modify the cognitive, behavioral, psychological, and physical environments in which voicing occurs (Roy et al., 2001; Thomas & Stemple, 2007). Indirect approaches include the following two components:
A therapeutic plan typically involves at least one direct approach and one or more indirect approaches based on the patient’s condition and goals. Some clinicians concentrate on directly modifying the specific symptoms of the inappropriate voice, whereas others take a more holistic approach, with the goal of balancing the physiologic subsystems of voice production—respiration, phonation, and resonance.
Clinicians may begin by
Use of personal protective equipment (PPE) (i.e., face mask) can potentially cause increased strain on voice and perception of vocal effort (Ribeiro et al., 2020). Please see ASHA's Aerosol Generating Procedures and the Resources section below for further information.
There may be differences between treating voice disorders in adults and pediatrics due to differences in anatomy, etiology, and developmental level. According to Braden (2018), anatomical differences between pediatric and adult voice include the following:
As a child’s phonatory structures grow and develop, the respective speaking pitch decreases (decreased frequency of vocal tract formants and fundamental frequency). There is a rapid decrease in mean fundamental frequency in the first 3 years, with another significant change at puberty (McAllister & Sjölander, 2013). Abnormal voice changes may be monitored during adolescence as they may be indicative of a functional voice disorder such as puberphonia. Stridor should also be closely monitored in the pediatric population as it could potentially indicate a compromised airway (Theis, 2010).
Many treatment approaches used for adult populations may be considered for the pediatric population, although adaptations may be needed to meet each child’s developmental level (Braden, 2018). Comorbid developmental disorders such as expressive or receptive language deficits may further complicate treatment of voice in the pediatric population. Some children may not have an internal concept of normal versus abnormal voicing (Hooper, 2004) and, therefore, may have difficulty addressing dysfunction.
Another consideration is potential difficulties that may occur in obtaining treatment in the school-based setting. Challenges may include
Please see Childes et al. (2017) for further consideration of barriers and challenges.
The following subsections offer brief descriptions of general and specific treatments for individuals with voice disorders. They are organized under two categories: physiologic voice therapy (i.e., those treatments that directly modify the physiology of the vocal mechanism) and symptomatic voice therapy (i.e., those treatments aimed at modifying deviant vocal symptoms or perceptual voice components using a variety of facilitating techniques). The inclusion of any specific treatment approach does not imply endorsement by ASHA. For more information about treatment approaches and their use with various voice disorders, see Stemple et al. (2010).
Treatment selection depends on the type and severity of the disorder and the communication needs of the individual. Clinicians incorporate functional daily voice needs into goals that reflect inclusion and participation in home, work, and social communities. Linguistic features in some languages may influence the need for specific aspects of voice treatment, such as influences of tonal languages on resonance. In addition, consideration of individuals’ needs, such as gender and/or gender expression or use of regional accents, is an important aspect of goal development.
Physiologic voice therapy programs strive to balance the three subsystems of voice production (respiration, phonation, and resonance) as opposed to working directly on isolated voice symptoms. Most physiologic approaches may be used with a variety of disorders that result in hyper- and hypofunctional vocal patterns. Below are some of the physiologic voice therapy programs, arranged in alphabetical order.
The accent method is designed to increase pulmonary output, improve glottic efficiency, reduce excessive muscular tension, and normalize the vibratory pattern during phonation. During therapy, the clinician may do one or more of the following tasks (Kotby et al., 1993; Malki et al., 2008):
CTT focuses exclusively on voice awareness and production in patient-driven conversational narrative, without the use of a traditional therapeutic hierarchy. Grounded in the tenets of motor learning, CTT strives to guide patients in achieving balanced phonation through clinician reinforcement, imitation and modeling in conversational speech. CTT incorporates six interchangeable components (Gartner-Schmidt et al., 2016; Gillespie et al., 2019), as follows:
EMST improves respiratory strength during phonation. Increase in maximum expiratory pressure can be trained with specific calibrated exercises over time, thus improving the relationship between respiration, phonation, and resonance. EMST uses an external device to mechanically overload the expiratory muscles. The device has a one-way, spring-loaded valve that blocks the flow of air until the targeted expiratory pressure is produced. The device can be calibrated to increase or decrease physiologic load on the targeted muscles (Pitts et al., 2009).
LSVT (Ramig et al., 1994) is an intensive treatment developed for patients with Parkinson’s disease. It is designed to maximize phonatory and respiratory function using a set of simple tasks. Individuals are instructed to produce a loud voice with maximum effort and to monitor the loudness of their voices while speaking. The effort that is involved generates improved respiratory support, laryngeal muscle activity, articulation, and even facial expression and animation. Using a sound-level meter, visual biofeedback may be provided to demonstrate the effort necessary to increase loudness. LSVT is provided by clinicians who are trained and certified in the administration of this technique.
Five basic principles are followed in LSVT, as follows:
Manual circumlaryngeal techniques are intended to reduce musculoskeletal tension and hyperfunction by re-posturing the larynx during phonation. There are three main manual laryngeal re-posturing techniques, as follows:
Applying these maneuvers during vocalization allows the individual to hear resulting changes in voice quality (Andrews, 2006; Roy et al., 1997). Care is taken when employing these techniques, as some patients report discomfort.
PhoRTE (Ziegler & Hapner, 2013) was adapted from LSVT and consists of four exercises, as follows:
Individuals are reminded to maintain a “strong” voice throughout these treatment exercises. PhoRTE has a less intensive intervention schedule than LSVT. PhoRTE also differs in that it combines both loudness and pitch when producing phrases (i.e., loud and low pitch, loud and high pitch). Use of PhoRTE has been studied in adults with presbyphonia (aging voice) as a way to improve vocal outcomes (e.g., decrease phonatory effort) and increase voice-related quality of life (Ziegler et al., 2014).
Resonant voice therapy uses a continuum of oral sensations and easy phonation, building from basic speech gestures through conversational speech. Resonant voice is defined as voice production involving oral vibratory sensations, usually on the anterior alveolar ridge or lips or higher in the face in the context of easy phonation. The goal of resonant voice therapy is to achieve the strongest, “cleanest” possible voice with the least effort and impact between the vocal folds to minimize the likelihood of injury and maximize the likelihood of vocal health (Stemple et al., 2010). The program incorporates humming and both voiced and voiceless productions that are shaped into phrase and conversational productions (Verdolini, 1998, 2000).
Stretch and flow phonation —also known as Casper-Stone Flow Phonation —is a physiological technique used to treat functional dysphonia or aphonia (Stone & Casteel, 1982). It focuses on airflow management and is used for individuals with breath-holding tendencies. Individuals are instructed to focus on a steady outflow of air during exhalation. Various biofeedback methods are used, including placing a piece of tissue in front of the mouth or holding one’s hand in front of the mouth to monitor airflow. Voicing is introduced once the individual masters continuous airflow during exhalation. As such, this technique produces a breathy voice quality and a slowed speaking rate. Eventually, this voice quality is carried into trials with spoken words and phrases, and the breathiness is gradually reduced.
Flow phonation (Gartner-Schmidt, 2008, 2010) is a hierarchical therapy program designed to facilitate increased airflow, ease of phonation, and forward oral resonance. It was modified from stretch and flow phonation by eliminating the “stretch” component, which reduced the rate of speech in the original therapy.
VFEs are a series of systematic voice manipulations designed to facilitate return to healthy voice function. VFEs work to strengthen and coordinate laryngeal musculature and improve efficiency of the relationship among airflow, vocal fold vibration, and supraglottic treatment of phonation (Stemple, 1984). Sounds used in training are specific, and correct production is encouraged. VFEs consist of four exercises—warm-up, stretching, contracting, and power exercises. Exercises are completed twice a day (morning and evening) in sets of two. Maximum phonation time goals are set on the basis of individual lung capacity and an airflow rate of 80 mL/sec. Individuals are advised to use a soft, engaged tone and are trained to use a semi-occluded vocal tract (SOVT) without tension during voice productions.
Symptomatic voice therapy focuses on the modification of vocal symptoms or perceptual voice components. Symptomatic voice therapy assumes voice improvement through direct symptom modification using a variety of voice facilitating techniques (Boone et al., 2010) that are either direct or indirect. Symptoms to be addressed may include
Amplification devices such as microphones can be used to increase voice loudness in any situation that requires increased volume (e.g., when speaking to large groups or during conversation when the individual’s voice is weak). As such, voice amplification can function as a supportive tool or as a means of augmentative communication. It can help prevent vocal hyperfunction that may be a result of talking at increased volume or for extended periods of time.
Auditory masking is used in cases of functional aphonia/dysphonia and often results in changed or normal phonation. Individuals are instructed to talk or read passages aloud while wearing headphones with masking noise input. Using a loud noise background, the individual often produces voice at increased volume (Lombard effect) that can be recorded and used later in treatment as a comparison (e.g., Adams & Lang, 1992; Brumm & Zollinger, 2011).
Biofeedback is the concept that self-control of physiologic functions is possible given external monitoring of internal bodily state. Biofeedback may be kinesthetic, auditory, or visual and is intended to provide clear and reliable information in response to alterations in voice production. Thus, patients may make real-time adjustments regarding vocal pitch, loudness, quality, and effort. Ideally, biofeedback helps increase awareness of physical sensations with respect to respiration, body position, and vibratory sensation. This awareness may help individuals understand physiological processes when generating voice.
Chant speech uses a rhythmic, prosodic pattern as a template for spoken utterances. It is used in therapy to help reduce phonatory effort that results in vocal fatigue and decreased phonatory capabilities. Chant speech requires pitch fluctuations and coordination of respiratory, phonatory, and resonance subsystems. Speakers habituate to these more efficient vocal patterns. The increased lung pressure required for these tasks may also decrease reliance on laryngeal resistance and reduce fatigue (e.g., McCabe & Titze, 2002).
Confidential voice is designed to reduce laryngeal tension/hyperfunction and increase airflow (Casper, 2000). The individual begins with an easy and breathy vocal quality and builds to normal voicing without decreasing airflow. This technique is intended to address excessive vocal tension and to facilitate relaxation in the muscles of the larynx.
Inhalation phonation is used to facilitate true vocal vibration in the presence of habitual ventricular fold phonation, functional aphonia, and/or muscle tension dysphonia. Individuals produce a high-pitched voice on inhalation. Upon inhalation voicing, the true vocal folds are in a stretched position, suddenly adducted, and in vibration. Upon exhalation, patients try to achieve a nearly matched voice. This approach eases the way to gaining true vocal fold vibration.
The patient is instructed in the technique of sitting with upright posture and with the shoulders in a low, relaxed position to facilitate voice production with less effort. Collaboration with a physical therapist or an occupational therapist may be necessary with some patients.
In cases of vocal hyperfunction, a variety of relaxation techniques may be useful as a tool to reduce both whole-body and laryngeal area tension. The goal of these techniques is to reduce effortful phonation. Frequently used techniques include progressive muscle relaxation (slowly tensing and then relaxing successive muscle groups), visualization (forming mental images of a peaceful, calming place or situation), and deep breathing exercises.
SOVT exercises involve narrowing at any supraglottic point along the vocal tract in order to maximize interaction between vocal fold vibration (sound production) and the vocal tract (the sound filter) and to produce resonant voice.
Cup bubble , also known as Lax Vox , is an aerodynamic building task aimed at improving the ability to sustain phonation while speaking. It is done by having a patient blow air initially into a cup of water without voice. Voicing can be added for subsequent trials, and in time, pitch can be altered across and within trials. Eventually, the cup is removed during voicing, and the phonation continues. These exercises are thought to widen the vocal tract during phonation and reduce tension in the vocal folds. Biofeedback increases the individual’s awareness of their healthy voice production (e.g., Denizoglu & Sihvo, 2010; Simberg & Laine, 2007).
Straw phonation is one of the most frequently used methods to create semi-occlusion in the vocal tract (Titze, 2006). Narrowing the vocal tract increases air pressure above the vocal folds, keeping them slightly separated during phonation and reducing the impact collision force. To accomplish this, the individual semi-occludes the vocal tract by phonating through a straw or tube. Resistance can be manipulated by varying the length and diameter of the straw or immersing the opposite end of the straw in water. Individuals practice sustaining vowels, performing pitch glides, humming songs, and transitioning to the intonation and stress patterns of speech. Eventually, use of the straw is reduced and eliminated.
Lip trills can be used to create semi-occlusion at the level of the lips. This technique involves a smooth movement of air through the oral cavity and over the lips, causing a vibration (lip buzz), similar to blowing bubbles underwater. Often, the trills are paired with phonation and pitch changes. The focus is to improve breath support and produce voicing without tension.
Twang therapy is used for individuals with hypophonic voice. It involves the narrowing of the aryepiglottic sphincter using a “twang” voice to create a high-intensity voice quality while maintaining low vocal effort (Lombard & Steinhauer, 2007). The desired outcome is decreasing phonatory effort and increasing vocal efficiency.
This facilitating technique uses the natural functions of yawning and sighing to overcome symptoms of vocal hyperfunction (e.g., elevated larynx and vocal constriction). The technique is intended to lower the position of the larynx and subsequently widen the supraglottal space in order to produce a more relaxed voice and encourage a more natural pitch.
SLPs should take appropriate measures whether services are being delivered in-person or through telepractice. Teletherapy may not provide as reliable sound quality as in-person. Therefore, additional equipment (e.g., microphones) can enhance vocal quality while reducing vocal strain. Additionally, SLPs should take into consideration whether or not the patient is telecommuting for their profession, as there is some emerging research regarding effects of telecommunications on voice (Tracy et al., 2020).
Please see ASHA’s Practice Portal page on Telepractice and ASHA’s Telepractice Evidence Map .
Additional training/education may be necessary to provide professional voice rehabilitation. Clients who use their voice professionally (e.g., singers, voice actors) may have different needs than the usual client with a voice disorder and may seek services from multiple disciplines, including:
Refer to the Service Delivery section of the Voice Evidence Map for pertinent scientific evidence, expert opinion, and client/caregiver perspective.
In addition to determining the type of speech and language treatment that is optimal for individuals with voice disorders, SLPs consider other service delivery variables—including format, provider, dosage, and timing—that may affect treatment outcomes.
This list of resources is not exhaustive, and the inclusion of any specific resource does not imply endorsement from ASHA.
Adams, S. G., & Lang, A. E. (1992). Can the Lombard effect be used to improve low voice intensity in Parkinson’s disease? International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders , 27 (2), 121–127. https://doi.org/10.3109/13682829209012034
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (n.d.). ASHA Cape-V Form . https://www.asha.org/Form/CAPE-V/
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (1993). Definitions of communication disorders and variations [Relevant paper]. https://www.asha.org/policy/RP1993-00208/
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2002). Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) form. https://www2.asha.org/Form/CAPE-V/
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2016). Scope of practice in speech-language pathology [Scope of practice]. http://www.asha.org/policy/SP2016-00343/
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2023). Code of ethics [Ethics]. https://www.asha.org/policy/et2016-00342/
Andrews, M. L. (2006). Manual of voice treatment: Pediatrics through geriatrics (3rd ed.). Thomson Delmar Learning.
Aronson, A. E., & Bless, D. M. (2009). Clinical voice disorders (4th ed.). Thieme.
Bainbridge, K. E., Roy, N., Losonczy, K. G., Hoffman, H. J., & Cohen, S. M. (2017). Voice disorders and associated risk markers among young adults in the United States. The Laryngoscope, 127 (9), 2093–2099. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.26465
Benninger, M. S., Holy, C. E., Bryson, P. C., & Milstein, C. F. (2017). Prevalence and occupation of patients presenting with dysphonia in the United States. Journal of Voice, 31 (5), 594–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.01.011
Bhattacharyya, N. (2014). The prevalence of voice problems among adults in the United States. The Laryngoscope, 124 (10), 2359–2362. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.24740
Black, L. I., Vahratian, A., & Hoffman, H. J. (2015). Communication disorders and use of intervention services among children aged 3–17 years: United States, 2012 (NCHS Data Brief, No. 205). National Center for Health Statistics.
Boone, D. R., McFarlane, S. C., Von Berg, S. L., & Zraick, R. I. (2010). The voice and voice therapy . Allyn & Bacon.
Braden, M. (2018). Advances in pediatric voice therapy. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups, 3 (3), 68–76. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_PERS-SIG3-2018-0005
Brumm, H., & Zollinger, S. A. (2011). The evolution of the Lombard effect: 100 years of psychoacoustic research. Behaviour, 148 (11–13), 1173–1198. https://doi.org/10.1163/000579511X605759
Byeon, H. (2019). The risk factors related to voice disorder in teachers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16 (19), 3675. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16193675
Carding, P. N., Roulstone, S., Northstone, K., & ALSPAC Study Team. (2006). The prevalence of childhood dysphonia: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Voice , 20 (4), 623–630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2005.07.004
Casper, J. (2000). Confidential voice. In J. C. Stemple (Ed.), Voice therapy: Clinical studies (pp. 128–139). Singular.
Childes, J., Acker, A., & Collins, D. (2017). Multiple perspectives on the barriers to identification and management of pediatric voice disorders. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups , 2 (3), 49–56. https://doi.org/10.1044/persp2.SIG3.49
Cohen, S. M., Kim, J., Roy, N., Asche, C., & Courey, M. (2012). Prevalence and causes of dysphonia in a large treatment-seeking population. The Laryngoscope , 122 (2), 343–348. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.22426
Colton, R. H., Casper, J. K., & Leonard, R. (2011). Understanding voice problems: A physiological perspective for diagnosis and treatment (4th ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
de Araújo Pernambuco, L., Espelt, A., Balata, P. M. M., & de Lima, K. C. (2014). Prevalence of voice disorders in the elderly: A systematic review of population-based studies. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 272 (10), 2601–2609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-014-3252-7
Deary, I. J., Wilson, J. A., Carding, P. N., & MacKenzie, K. (2003). VoiSS: A patient-derived Voice Symptom Scale. Journal of Psychosomatic Research , 54 (5), 483–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3999(02)00469-5
De Bodt, M., Patteeuw, T., & Versele, A. (2015). Temporal variables in voice therapy. Journal of Voice , 29 (5), 611–617. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3999(02)00469-5
Dejonckere, P. H. (2010). Assessment of voice and respiratory function. In M. Remacle & H. E. Eckel (Eds.), Surgery of larynx and trachea (pp. 11–26). Springer.
Denizoglu, I., & Sihvo, M. (2010). Lax Vox voice therapy technique. Current Practice in Otorhinolaryngology , 6, 285–295.
Duff, M. C., Proctor, A., & Yairi, E. (2004). Prevalence of voice disorders in African American and European American preschoolers. Journal of Voice , 18 (3), 348–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2003.12.009
Eckel, F. C., & Boone, D. R. (1981). The s/z ratio as an indicator of laryngeal pathology. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 46 (2), 147–149. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshd.4602.147
Gartner-Schmidt, J. (2008). Flow phonation. In A. Behrman (Ed.), The complete voice therapy workbook. Plural.
Gartner-Schmidt, J. (2010). Flow phonation. In J. Stemple & L. T. Fry (Eds.), Voice therapy: Clinical case studies (3rd ed.). Plural.
Gartner-Schmidt, J., Gherson, S., Hapner, E., Roth, D., Schneider, S., & Gillespie, A. (2016). The development of conversation training therapy: A concept paper. Journal of Voice, 30 (5), 563–573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.06.007
Gillespie, A., Yabes, J., Rosen, C. A., & Gartner-Schmidt, J. (2019). Efficacy of conversation training therapy for patients with benign vocal fold lesions and muscle tension dysphonia compared to historical matched control patients. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research , 62 (11), 4062–4079. https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_JSLHR-S-19-0136
Hogikyan, N. D., & Sethuraman, G. (1999). Validation of an instrument to measure voice-related quality of life (V-RQOL). Journal of Voice, 13 (4), 557–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0892-1997(99)80010-1
Hooper, C. R. (2004). Treatment of voice disorders in children. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 35 (4), 320–326. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2004/031)
Hseu, A., Nohamin, A., Kosuke, K., Woodnorth, G., & Nuss, R. (2018). Voice abnormalities and laryngeal pathology in preterm children. Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology , 127 (8), 508–513. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0003489418776987
Jacobson, B. H., Johnson, A., Grywalski, C., Silbergleit, A., Jacobson, G., Benninger, M. S., & Newman, C. W. (1997). The Voice Handicap Index (VHI): Development and validation. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 6 (3), 66–70. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360.0603.66
Kempster, G. B., Gerratt, B. R., Abbott, K. V., Barkmeier-Kraemer, J., & Hillman, R. E. (2009). Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice: Development of a standardized clinical protocol. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 18 (2), 124–132. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2008/08-0017)
Kotby, M. N., Shiromoto, O., & Hirano, M. (1993). The Accent Method of voice therapy: Effect of accentuations on F0, SPL, and airflow. Journal of Voice , 7 (4), 319–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0892-1997(05)80120-1
Kwok, M., & Eslick, G. D. (2019). The impact of vocal and laryngeal pathologies among professional singers: A meta-analysis. Journal of Voice, 33 (1), 58–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.09.002
Lee, L., Stemple, J. C., Glaze, L., & Kelchner, L. N. (2004). Quick screen for voice and supplementary documents for identifying pediatric voice disorders. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 35 (4), 308–319. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2004/030)
Lombard, L. E., & Steinhauer, K. M. (2007). A novel treatment for hypophonic voice: Twang therapy. Journal of Voice, 21 (3), 294–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2005.12.006
Ma, E. P.-M., & Yiu, E. M.-L. (2001). Voice activity and participation profile assessing the impact of voice disorders on daily activities. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44 (3), 511–524. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2001/040)
Maat, R. C., Hilland, M., Røksund, O. D., Halvorsen, T., Olofsson, J., Aarstad, H. J., & Heimdal, J.-H. (2011). Exercise-induced laryngeal obstruction: Natural history and effect of surgical treatment. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology , 268 (10), 1485–1492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-011-1656-1
Malki, K. H., Nasser, N. H., Hassan, S. M., & Farahat, M. (2008). Accent method of voice therapy for treatment of severe muscle tension dysphonia. Saudi Medical Journal , 29 (4), 610–613.
Martins, R. H. G., do Amaral, H. A., Tavares, E. L. M., Martins, M. G., Gonҫalves, T. M., & Dias, N. H. (2015). Voice disorders: Etiology and diagnosis. Journal of Voice , 30 (6), 761.e1–761.e9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.09.017
Martins, R. H. G., Pereira, E. R., Hidalgo, C. B., & Tavares, E. L. M. (2014). Voice disorders in teachers: A review. Journal of Voice, 28 (6), 716–724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.02.008
Mathers-Schmidt, B. A. (2001). Paradoxical vocal fold motion: A tutorial on a complex disorder and the speech-language pathologist’s role. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 10 (2), 111–125. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2001/012)
McAllister, A., & Sjölander, P. (2013). Children’s voice and voice disorders. Seminars in Speech and Language , 34 (2), 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1342978
McCabe, D. J., & Titze, I. R. (2002). Chant therapy for treating vocal fatigue among public school teachers: A preliminary study. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology , 11 (4), 356–369. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2002/040)
Murry, T., & Milstein, C. F. (2016). Laryngeal movement disorders and their management. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups , 1 (3), 75–82. https://doi.org/10.1044/persp1.SIG3.75
Patel, R. R., Awan, S. N., Barkmeier-Kraemer, J., Courey, M., Deliyski, D., Eadie, T., Paul, D., Švec, J. G., & Hillman, R. (2018). Recommended protocols for instrumental assessment of voice: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Expert Panel to Develop a Protocol for Instrumental Assessment of Vocal Function. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 27 (3), 887–905. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_AJSLP-17-0009
Patel, R. R., Venediktov, R., Schooling, T., & Wang, B. (2015). Evidence-based systematic review: Effects of speech-language pathology treatment for individuals with paradoxical vocal fold motion. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology , 24 (3), 566–584. https://doi.org/10.1044/2015_AJSLP-14-0120
Pestana, P. M., Vaz-Freitas, S., & Manso, M. C. (2017). Prevalence of voice disorders in singers: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Voice , 31 (6), 722–727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.02.010
Pitts, T., Bolser, D., Rosenbek, J., Troche, M., Okun, M. S., & Sapienza, C. (2009). Impact of expiratory muscle strength training on voluntary cough and swallow function in Parkinson disease. CHEST , 135 (5), 1301–1308. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.08-1389
Rahbar, R., Rouillon, I., Roger, G., Lin, A., Nuss, R. C., Denoyelle, F., McGill, T. K., Healy, G. B., & Garabedian, E. (2006). The presentation and management of laryngeal cleft: A 10-year experience. Archives of Otolaryngology—Head & Neck Surgery , 132 (12), 1335–1341. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.132.12.1335
Ramig, L. O., Bonitati, C., Lemke, J., & Horii, Y. (1994). Voice treatment for patients with Parkinson disease: Development of an approach and preliminary efficacy data. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology , 2, 191–209.
Ribeiro, V. V., Dassie-Leite, A. P., Pereira, E. C., Santos, A. D. N., Martins, P., & Irineu, R. A. (2020). Effect of wearing a face mask on vocal self-perception during a pandemic. Journal of Voice. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.09.006
Roy, N., Barkmeier-Kraemer, J., Eadie, T., Sivasankar, M. P., Mehta, D., Paul, D., & Hillman, R. (2013). Evidence-based clinical voice assessment: A systematic review. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 22 (2), 212–226. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2012/12-0014)
Roy, N., Bless, D. M., Heisey, D., & Ford, C. N. (1997). Manual circumlaryngeal therapy for functional dysphonia: An evaluation of short- and long-term treatment outcomes. Journal of Voice , 11 (3), 321–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0892-1997(97)80011-2
Roy, N., Gray, S. D., Simon, M., Dove, H., Corbin-Lewis, K., & Stemple, J. C. (2001). An evaluation of the effects of two treatment approaches for teachers with voice disorders: A prospective randomized clinical trial. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44 (2), 286–296. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2001/023)
Roy, N., Kim, J., Courey, M., & Cohen, S. M. (2016). Voice disorders in the elderly: A national database study. The Laryngoscope , 126 (2), 421–428. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.25511
Roy, N., Merrill, R. M., Gray, S. D., & Smith, E. M. (2005). Voice disorders in the general population: Prevalence, risk factors, and occupational impact. The Laryngoscope , 115 (11), 1988–1995. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlg.0000179174.32345.41
Sapienza, C., & Ruddy, B. H. (2009). Voice disorders . Plural.
Simberg, S., & Laine A. (2007). The resonance tube method in voice therapy: Description and practical implementations. Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology , 32 (4), 165–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/14015430701207790
Speyer, R., Bogaardt, H. C., Passos, V. L., Roodenburg, N. P., Zumach, A., Heijnen, M. A., Baijens, L. W., Fleskens, S. J., & Brunings, J. W. (2010). Maximum phonation time: Variability and reliability. Journal of Voice, 24 (3), 281–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2008.10.004
Stemple, J. C. (1984). Clinical voice pathology: Theory and management. Charles E. Merrill.
Stemple, J. C. (2000). Voice therapy: Clinical studies. Singular.
Stemple, J. C., Glaze, L. E., & Klaben, B. G. (2010). Clinical voice pathology: Theory and management (4th ed.). Plural.
Stemple, J. C., Roy, N., & Klaben, B. G. (2014). Clinical voice pathology: Theory and management (5th ed.). Plural.
Stone, R. E., & Casteel, R. (1982). Restoration of voice in nonorganically based dysphonia. In M. Filter (Ed.), Phonatory voice disorders in children (pp. 132–165). Charles C Thomas.
Švec, J. G., & Granqvist, S. (2018). Tutorial and guidelines on measurement of sound pressure level in voice and speech. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research , 61 (3), 441–461. https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_JSLHR-S-17-0095
Theis, S. M. (2010). Pediatric voice disorders: Evaluation and treatment. The ASHA Leader , 15 (14), 12–15. https://doi.org/10.1044/leader.FTR1.15142010.12
Thomas, L. B., & Stemple, J. C. (2007). Voice therapy: Does science support the art? Communicative Disorders Review, 1, 49–77.
Titze, I. R. (2006). Voice training and therapy with a semi-occluded vocal tract: Rationale and scientific underpinnings. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49 (2), 448–459. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2006/035)
Tracy, L. F., Segina, R. K., Cadiz, M. D., & Stepp, C. E. (2020). The impact of communication modality on voice production. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research , 63 (9), 2913–2920. https://doi.org/10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00161
Traister, R. S., Fajt, M. L., & Petrov, A. A. (2016). The morbidity and cost of vocal cord dysfunction misdiagnosed as asthma. Allergy & Asthma Proceedings , 37 (2), e25–e31. https://doi.org/10.2500/aap.2016.37.3936
Van Stan, J. H., Roy, N., Awan, S., Stemple, J. C., & Hillman, R. E. (2015). A taxonomy of voice therapy. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 24 (2), 101–125. https://doi.org/10.1044/2015_AJSLP-14-0030
Verdolini, K. (1998). Resonant voice therapy . The National Center for Voice and Speech.
Verdolini, K. (2000). Resonant voice therapy. In J. C. Stemple (Ed.), Voice therapy: Clinical studies (pp. 46–61). Singular.
Verdolini, K., & Ramig, L. O. (2001). Review: Occupational risks for voice problems. Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology, 26 (1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/14015430119969
Verdolini, K., Rosen, C., & Branski, R. C. (Eds.). (2006). Classification manual for voice disorders-I . Erlbaum.
Ziegler, A., & Hapner, E. R. (2013). Phonation Resistance Training Exercise (PhoRTE) therapy. In A. Behrman & J. Haskell (Eds.), Exercises for voice therapy (Vol. 2). Plural.
Ziegler, A., Verdolini Abbott, K., Johns, M., Klein, A., & Hapner, E. R. (2014). Preliminary data on two voice therapy interventions in the treatment of presbyphonia. The Laryngoscope, 124 (8), 1869–1876. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.24548
Acknowledgements.
Content for ASHA's Practice Portal is developed through a comprehensive process that includes multiple rounds of subject matter expert input and review. ASHA extends its gratitude to the following subject matter experts who were involved in the development of the Voice Disorders page:
In addition, ASHA thanks the members of the ASHA-Special Interest Division 3: Working Group on Voice and Voice Disorders, whose work was foundational to the development of this content. Members of the working group were Julie Barkmeier (Chair), Glenn W. Bunting, Douglas M. Hicks, Michael P. Karnell, Stephen C. McFarlane, Robert E. Stone, Shelley Von Berg, and Thomas L. Watterson. Alex F. Johnson served as monitoring vice president. Amy Knapp and Diane R. Paul served as ex officio members.
ASHA also thanks the American Academy of Otolaryngology-HNS Speech, Voice and Swallowing Committee members and ASHA Special Interest Division 3, Voice and Voice Disorders Steering Committee members whose work was foundational to the development of this content.
The members of the AAO-HNS Speech, Voice and Swallowing Committee included Robert Sataloff, Jonathan Aviv, Mary Beaver, Alison Behrman (ASHA representative), Mark Courey, Glendon Gardner, Norman Hogikyan, Christy Ludlow (ASHA representative), Roger Nuss, Clark Rosen, Mark Shikowitz, Robert Stachler, Lee Akst, and Susan Sedory Holzer (staff liaison).
The members of the ASHA Special Interest Division 3, Voice and Voice Disorders Steering Committee included Leslie Glaze (coordinator), Bernice Klaben, Lori Lombard, Mary Sandage (associate coordinator), Susan Thibeault, and Michelle Ferketic (ex officio). Celia Hooper, vice president for professional practices (2003–2005), served as monitoring vice president for ASHA.
The recommended citation for this Practice Portal page is:
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (n.d.). Voice Disorders. (Practice Portal). Retrieved month, day, year, from www.asha.org/Practice-Portal/Clinical-Topics/Voice-Disorders/ .
Evidence Maps
Peer Connections
ASHA Related Content
Content Disclaimer: The Practice Portal, ASHA policy documents, and guidelines contain information for use in all settings; however, members must consider all applicable local, state and federal requirements when applying the information in their specific work setting.
The American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA) is the national professional, scientific, and credentialing association for 234,000 members, certificate holders, and affiliates who are audiologists; speech-language pathologists; speech, language, and hearing scientists; audiology and speech-language pathology assistants; and students.
Get involved.
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association 2200 Research Blvd., Rockville, MD 20850 Members: 800-498-2071 Non-Member: 800-638-8255
MORE WAYS TO CONNECT
Site Help | A–Z Topic Index | Privacy Statement | Terms of Use © 1997- American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
U.S. PATIENTS: 713.790.3333
Diagnosing & treating dysphonia.
Diagnosis starts with a comprehensive physical exam by our neuro-laryngology experts. We will review your medical history and symptoms. Symptoms might include:
Next, we will perform a speech evaluation to assess your baseline breathing, swallowing and speech. Depending on your symptoms, you may be diagnosed with one of the two main types of dysphonia:
Houston Methodist offers advanced testing and technologies to determine the cause of your condition. Tests will vary depending on your history and symptoms and may include:
Though some cases are temporary, dysphonia can be a life-long, chronic condition. It can be caused by:
It takes an experienced team to effectively treat or manage dysphonia. Houston Methodist offers leading-edge treatment options, backed by research and the combined expertise of our specialized team. We will work together to design a personalized care plan to fit your needs.
While there is no cure for dysphonia yet, specialized care can significantly reduce symptoms. Treatment options depend upon the cause, severity and duration of symptoms. Recommended treatments may include:
In severe cases, patients find that a mechanical speech device can help improve communication and quality of life.
Want to create or adapt books like this? Learn more about how Pressbooks supports open publishing practices.
This chapter, except where otherwise noted, is adapted from Stand up, Speak out: The Practice and Ethics of Public Speaking , CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 .
Now that you have an understanding of how important it is for you to use ethical principles in creating an effective speech, let’s move to the topic you have all been either dreading or can’t wait to learn about: how to manage speech anxiety.
Take a look at this scene from the Albert Meets Hitch video and see if you can relate to how nervous these people are.
Hitch: Albert meets Hitch HD CLIP , by Binge Society – The Greatest Movie Scenes , Standard YouTube License. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MIBzVc3kJAM
You can imagine how much better this interaction would have gone had the participants not been so anxious. The question is, is it possible to manage your speech anxiety during a conversation, a job interview, or a speech?
Many different social situations can make us feel uncomfortable if we anticipate that we will be evaluated and judged by others. The process of revealing ourselves and knowing that others are evaluating us can be threatening whether we are meeting new acquaintances, participating in group discussions, or speaking in front of an audience.
According to James McCroskey, communication apprehension is the broad term that refers to an individual’s “fear or anxiety associated with either real or anticipated communication with another person or persons” (McCroskey, 2001). At its heart, communication apprehension is a psychological response to evaluation. This psychological response, however, quickly becomes physical as our body responds to the threat the mind perceives. Our bodies cannot distinguish between psychological and physical threats, so we react as though we are facing a Mack truck barreling in our direction. The body’s circulatory and adrenal systems shift into overdrive, preparing us to function at maximum physical efficiency, kicking in the “flight or fight” response (Sapolsky, 2004). Yet instead of running away or fighting, all we need to do is stand and talk.
The excess energy our body creates can make it harder for us to be effective public speakers. But because communication apprehension is rooted in our minds, if we understand more about the body’s responses to stress, we can better develop mechanisms for managing the body’s misguided attempts to help us cope with social judgment fears.
There are various physical sensations associated with communication apprehension. We might notice our heart pounding or our hands feeling clammy. We may break out in a sweat, have stomach butterflies, or even feel nauseated. Our hands and legs might start to shake, or we may begin to pace nervously. Our voices may quiver, and we may have a dry-mouth sensation that makes it difficult to articulate even simple words. Breathing becomes more rapid, and, in extreme cases, we might feel dizzy or light-headed. Communication anxiety is profoundly disconcerting because we feel powerless to control our bodies. We may become so anxious that we fear we will forget our name, much less remember the main points of the speech we are about to deliver.
The physiological changes our bodies produce at critical moments are designed to contribute to ensure our muscles work efficiently and expand available energy. Circulation and breathing become more rapid so that additional oxygen can reach the muscles. Increased circulation causes us to sweat. Adrenaline rushes through our body, instructing the body to speed up its movements. If we stay immobile behind a lectern, this hormonal urge to speed up may produce shaking and trembling. Additionally, digestive processes are inhibited so we will not lapse into the relaxed, sleepy state that is typical after eating. Instead of feeling sleepy, we feel butterflies in the pit of our stomach. By understanding what is happening to our bodies in response to public speaking stress, we can better cope with these reactions and channel them in constructive directions.
Watch this Ted Ed video, The Science of Stage Fright by Mikael Cho. In it, Cho shares what physically happens when we become anxious. It is now called the “fight, flight, or freeze” response because sometimes we hold very still when frightened.
The video can make you feel scared just watching it, but try and notice that there is an actual science to stage fright or speech anxiety, and you are not alone in feeling nervous or scared.
Pay particular attention near the end when Cho gives you one option to help manage your anxiety.
The science of stage fright (and how to overcome it) – Mikael Cho , by TED-Ed , Standard YouTube License. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K93fMnFKwfI
After watching the video, did you realize that anxiety is a normal human reaction? We can help reduce the anxiety, but not totally eliminate it. As you continue with this module you will learn strategies to reduce anxiety.
The physiological state we label as communication anxiety does not differ from those that we label rage or excitement. Even seasoned effective speakers and performers experience some communication apprehension. What differs is the mental label that we put on the experience. Effective speakers have learned to channel their body’s reactions, using the energy released by these physiological reactions to create animation and stage presence.
It has been documented that famous speakers throughout history such as Cicero, Daniel Webster, Abraham Lincoln, Eleanor Roosevelt, Winston Churchill, and Gloria Steinem conquered significant public speaking fears. Celebrities who experience performance anxiety include actor Harrison Ford, Beyonce, Lady Gaga, Katy Perry, Rihanna, Matt Damon, and George Clooney (Hickson, 2016).
Before we look at how to manage our speech anxiety, let’s dispel some myths.
The following sections are adapted from Stand up, Speak out: The Practice and Ethics of Public Speaking , CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 .
Nearly every experienced speaker has gotten to the middle of a presentation and realized that a key notecard is missing or that he or she skipped important information from the speech’s beginning. When encountering these difficulties, a good strategy is to pause for a moment to think through what you want to do next. Is it important to include the missing information, or can it be omitted without hurting the audience’s ability to understand the rest of your speech? If it needs to be included, do you want to add the information now, or will it fit better later in the speech? It is often difficult to remain silent when you encounter this situation, but pausing for a few seconds will help you to figure out what to do and may be less distracting to the audience than sputtering through a few “ums” and “uhs.”
Technology has become a very useful public speaking aid, allowing us to use audio or video clips, presentation software, or direct links to websites. However, one of the best-known truisms about technology is that it can and does break down. Web servers go offline, files will not download in a timely manner, and media are incompatible with the presentation room’s computer. It is important to always have a backup plan, developed in advance, in case of technical difficulties. As you develop your speech, visual aids, and other presentation materials, think through what you will do if you cannot show a particular graph or if your presentation slides are hopelessly garbled. Although your beautifully prepared chart may be superior to the oral description you can provide, your ability to provide a succinct oral description when technology fails can give your audience the information they need.
External Distractions
Although many public speaking instructors directly address audience etiquette, you’re still likely to experience an audience member walking in late, a cell phone ringing, or even a car alarm blaring outside your room. If you are distracted by external events like these, it is often useful, and sometimes necessary—as in the case of the loud car alarm—to pause and wait so that you can regain the audience’s attention and be heard.
Whatever the unexpected event, as the speaker, your most important job is to maintain your composure. It is important not to get upset or angry because of these glitches—and, once again, the key is to be fully prepared. If you keep your cool and quickly implement a plan B for moving forward with your speech, your audience is likely to be impressed and may listen even more attentively to the rest of your presentation.
There are various steps you can take to counteract stress’ negative physiological effects on the body. You can place words and symbols in your notes that remind you to pause and breathe during points in your speech, such as “slow down” or ☺.
It is also a good idea before you get started to pause a moment to set an appropriate pace from the onset. Look at your audience and smile. It is a reflex for some of your audience members to smile back. Those smiles will reassure you that your audience members are friendly.
Physical movement helps to channel some of the excess anxiety-induced energy that your body produces. If at all possible, move around the front of the room rather than remaining imprisoned behind the lectern or gripping it for dear life; however, avoid pacing nervously from side to side. Move closer to the audience and then stop for a moment. If you are afraid that moving away from the lectern will reveal your shaking hands, use note cards rather than a sheet of paper for your outline. Note cards do not quiver like paper, and they provide you with something to do with your hands.
Vocal warm-ups are also important to do before speaking. Just as athletes warm up before practice or competition and musicians warm up before playing, speakers need to get their voices ready to speak. Talking with others before your speech or quietly humming to yourself can get your voice ready for your presentation. You can even sing or practice a bit of your speech out loud while you’re in the shower, where the warm, moist air is beneficial for your vocal mechanism. Gently yawning a few times is also an excellent way to stretch the key muscle groups involved in speaking.
Immediately before you speak, you can relax your neck and shoulder muscles by gently rolling your head from side to side.
During your speech, make a point of establishing direct eye contact with your audience members. By looking at individuals, you establish a series of one-to-one contacts similar to interpersonal communication.
Now for some scientific managing-speech-anxiety magic. You are welcome to use what you hear in your own plan if you choose. Take a listen to Harvard Professor Amy Cuddy and a surprising two-minute strategy that many students find very effective. It is worth watching the full twenty-minute video, Your Body Language May Shape Who You Are.
Amy Cuddy: Your Body Language May Shape Who You Are , by TEDGlobal 2012, CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Yes, two minutes, two minutes, two minutes. Remember the audience is more interested in learning about what you have to say than in judging you. So, forget yourself and be there for the audience.
Note: Are you a good people watcher? I hope you are because it will aid your progress as a speaker. You will be viewing video clips of speakers throughout the course. Pay attention to what went well in a speech and what you would recommend a speaker change to make their speech better.
For example, In Amy Cuddy’s speech, her data visual aids helped in better understanding the speech. Did you notice where her hair was? Would you recommend she do something different with it? Notice, notice, notice. It will help you know what you want to do and not do in your own speeches.
Ackrill, C. (2012, October 5). 6 thought patterns of the stressed: No. 3 – catastrophizing. American Institute of Stress. Retrieved from http://www.cynthiaackrill.com/6-thought-patterns-of-the-stressed-no-3-catastrophizing-lions-and-tigers-and-bears-oh-my/
Allen, M., Hunder, J.E., & Donohue, W.A. (2009). Meta-analysis of self-report data on the effectiveness of public speaking anxiety treatment techniques. Communication Education , 38, 54–76.
Ayres, J. (2005). Performance visualization and behavioral disruption: A clarification. Communication Reports , 18 55–63.
Ayres, J., & Hopf, T. (1995). Coping with speech anxiety . Norwood, NJ: Ablex
Bodie, G.D. (2010). A racing heart, rattling knees, and ruminative thoughts: Defining, explaining, and treating public speaking anxiety. Communication Education , 59, 70–105.
Boyes, A. (2013a, March 13). 6 tips for overcoming anxiety-related procrastination. Psychology Today . Retrieved from https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/in-practice/201303/6-tips-overcoming anxiety-related-procrastination
Boyes, A. (2013b, January 10). What is catastrophizing? Cognitive distortions. Psychology Today . Retrieved from https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/in-practice/201301/what-is-catastrophizing-cognitive-distortions
Cunningham, V., Lefkoe, M., & sechrest, L. (2006). Eliminating fears: An intervention that permanently eliminates the fear of public speaking. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy , 13, 183–193
Dean, J. (2012, October 10). The illusion of transparency. PsyBlog . Retrieved from http://www.spring.org.uk/2012/10/the-illusion-of-transparency.php
Ellis, A. (1995). Thinking processes involved in irrational beliefs and their disturbed consequences. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy , 9, 105 –116.
Ellis, A. (1996). How I learned to help clients feel better and get better. Psychotherapy , 33, 149–151.
Finn, A.N., Sawyer, C.R, & Schrodt, P. (2009). Examining the effect of exposure therapy on public speaking state anxiety. Communication Education , 58, 92–109.
Grohol, J.M. (2013). What is catastrophizing? Psych Central . Retrieved from http://psychcentral.com/lib/what-is-catastrophizing/1276/
Holmes, E.A., & Mathews, A. (2005). Mental imagery and emotion: A special relationship? Emotion , 5, 489–497.
Horowitz, B. (2002). Communication apprehension: Origins and management . Albany, NY: Singular.
Jones, C.R., Fazio, R.H., & Vasey, M.W. (2012). Attention control buffers the effect of public-speaking anxiety on performance. Social Psychology & Personality Science , 3, 556–561.
Lucas, S. E. (2012). The art of public speaking . (11th ed.). McGrawHill.
MacInnis, C.C., MacKinnon, S.P., & MacIntyre, P.D. (2010). The illusion of transparency and normative beliefs about anxiety during public speaking. Current Research in Social Psychology , 15(4). Retrieved from http://www.uiowa.edu/~grpproc/crisp/crisp15_4.pdf
Motley, M.T. (1995). Overcoming your fear of public speaking: A proven method . New York, NY: McGraw-Hill
Motley, M.T. (1997). COM Therapy. In J.A. Daly, J.C. McCroskey, J.Ayres, T. Hopf, & D.M. Ayres (Eds.) Avoiding communication . Creskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Motley, M.T. (2011, January 18). Reducing public speaking anxiety: The communication orientation. YouTube. Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GYfHQvi2NAg
Noonan, P. (1998). Simply speaking: How to communicate your ideas with style, substance, and clarity . New York, NY: Harper Collins.
O’Donohue, W.T., & Fisher, J.E. (2008). Cognitive behavior therapy: Applying empirically supported techniques in your practice . Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
Pertaub, D., Slater, M., & Barker, C. (2002). An experiment on public speaking anxiety in response to three different types of virtual audiences. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments , 11, 670–678.
Peterson, C. (2000). The future of optimism. American Psychologist , 55, 44–55.
Prochow, H.V. (1944). Great stories from great lives . New York, NY: Harper & Brothers.
Roby, D.E. (2009). Teacher leadership skills: An analysis of communication apprehension. Education , 129, 608–614. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ871611
Sandburg, C. (2002). Abraham Lincoln: The prairie years and the war years . New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Savitsky, K., & Gilovich, T. (2003). The illusion of transparency and the alleviation of speech anxiety. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , 39, 618–625.
Seim, R.W., Waller, S.A., & Spates, R.C. (2010). A preliminary investigation of continuous and intermittent exposures in the treatment of public speaking anxiety. International Journal of Behavioral Consultation and Therapy , 6, 84–94.
Spiegler, M.D., & Guevremont, D.C. (1998). Contemporary behavior therapy . Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Svoboda, E. (2009, February/March). Avoiding the big choke. Scientific American Mind , pp. 36–41.
Tan Chin Keok, R. (2010, November 25–27). Public speaking: A case study of speech anxiety in L1 and L2. Seminar Penyelidikan Pendidikan Pasca Ijazah .
Witt, P.L., & Behnke, R.R. (2006). Anticipatory speech anxiety as a function of public speaking assignment type. Communication Education , 55, 167–177.
Witt, P.L., Brown, K.C., Roberts, J.B., Weasel, J., Sawyer, C.R., & Behnke, R.R. (2006). Somatic anxiety patterns before, during, and after giving a public speech. Southern Communication Journal , 71, 87–100.
Young, M.J., Behnke, R.R., & Mann, Y.M. (2004). Anxiety patterns in employment interviews. Communication Reports , 17, 49–57.
(no date). man, portrait, grown up, people, smiling, facial hair, one person, beard, looking at camera, emotion [Image]. pxfuel. https://www.pxfuel.com/en/free-photo-ehnup
Binge Society – The Greatest Movie Scenes. (2020, November 6). Hitch: Albert meets Hitch HD CLIP [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MIBzVc3kJAM
Cherise King. (no date). Physiological Symptoms of Communication Apprehension [Image].
Freddie Peña. (2010, 10 July). Nervous? [Image]. flickr. https://www.flickr.com/photos/fixem/4815843665/
TED. (2012, June). Amy Cuddy: Your body language may shape who you are [Video]. TED. https://www.ted.com/talks/amy_cuddy_your_body_language_may_shape_who_you_are?language=en
TED-Ed. (2013, October 8). The science of stage fright (and how to overcome it) – Mikael Cho [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K93fMnFKwfI
www.audio-luci-store.it. (2012, 19 June). Speaker at Podium [Image]. flickr. https://www.flickr.com/photos/audiolucistore/7403735392/
Public Speaking Copyright © 2022 by Sarah Billington and Shirene McKay is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License , except where otherwise noted.
How we can help people with vocal cord paralysis.
Vocal cord paralysis happens when there is damage to the nerves that are attached to the voice box. Damage to these nerves may mean that the vocal cords do not open and close in the correct way.
Vocal cord paralysis is when there is no movement of the vocal cords due to damage to the nerves. A person can be affected at any age and for a number of reasons. When the vocal cords are in the closed position, air is able to pass through creating the vibration needed for speech. If the vocal folds are damaged, or paralysed, then this function will not happen in the correct way, leading to a person’s speech being affected. The severity of the effect on a person’s speech will depend how badly the nerves are damaged. People, who suffer from this condition, may find that swallowing and coughing is hard. This is because the folds are not able to close properly and so this leaves the windpipe open to particles of food and saliva being inhaled into lungs and trachea (aspiration).
Paralysis of the vocal cords is caused by nerve damage. They can be damaged in a number of different ways. Some of which are listed below:
Some nerve damage will resolve itself over time, in these cases it is not recommended to operate on as it may be too dangerous and resolve itself anyway. The exact cause in most cases is not known and varies from person to person.
SLT UK can help with a number of associated problems which result from vocal cord paralysis. Vocal cord paralysis may cause voice problems, speech sound problems, swallowing difficulties and communication problems.
Speech and language therapy will help in these areas and enable a patient to overcome or manage their paralysis and therefore improve their own communication. Some paralysis may return back to normal whilst others may not. Speech and language therapy will help a patient to adjust to these changes either way.
Speech and language therapy can be done before or after surgery or it can be the individual method of treatment. The extent of damage will depend upon what type of input is needed for each individual case. Speech and language therapy will enable an individual to cope with the effects of paralysis; this may involve working on different methods of communication.
Speech and language therapy can help improve any aspect of an individual's communication dependent on their needs. It can also help increase confidence and self-esteem whilst reducing anxiety when communicating with others.
Speech and language therapy treatment may involve assessments, reports, reviews, therapy programmes, support groups, training, advice and education.
An initial assessment will be carried out by one of our speech and language therapists. This will highlight any worries and difficulties concerning communication, speech and swallowing. It will also provide a chance for you to share any concerns you may have, and allow you to discuss what you would like to work on and improve.
Vocal cord paralysis can occur at any age or stage in life and can differ in severity depending upon the extent of damage to the nerves. Some paralysis may resolve itself, whilst others may be permanent. Speech and language therapy will help this condition as it will enable a patient to try different ways of communicating if needed, and also give some guidance on how to incorporate the paralysis into everyday life.
If you feel you may benefit from speech and language therapy or would like any more information on our services please email [email protected] or call 0330 088 5643.
Worried about your communication.
If you are worried about any aspect of your speech, language and communication, do not hesitate to contact us to speak to one of our passionate speech and language therapists.
We offer a free telephone consultation in order to discuss any concerns regarding your speech, language, voice or swallowing.
Phone number
Email address
SLT.co.uk Copyright 2024. All rights reserved.
Anxiety and paralysis.
Micah Abraham, BSc
Last updated February 12, 2021
Anxiety can be paralyzing, both figuratively and literally. Often, living with anxiety feels like you’re being deprived of the ability to live a normal life. Emotionally, you may constantly feel like a deer in the headlights, unable to move or get out of the way of the threat.
Anxiety can also be paralyzing physically. At least, there are symptoms that can make you feel like your body is literally paralyzed. In this article, we'll explore the physical and emotional paralysis that can happen in people who have anxiety.
Let's start with the idea of emotional paralysis, because this is something that many people with anxiety deals with from time to time.
Anxiety is caused by your body reacting to fear, even though a literal, dangerous threat isn't necessarily present. There may be something worth fearing, but the level of anxiety you experience may be disproportionate to the fear you should experience in that situation. For example, having to give a speech at your friend’s wedding is not a life-threatening situation, even though it may feel that way.
Having said that, you may also experience anxiety in the absence of any easily noticeable fearful thoughts.. Anxiety itself is the activation of the fight or flight response - a reflex that your body uses to react to danger - and there are many people that experience these symptoms all the time, despite no rational fears serving as triggers for the anxiety.
The fight or flight response can lead to a sense of emotional paralysis. This is because all of your mind’s energy is centered on one specific task: surviving danger. This not only stresses you out, but leaves you without enough emotional or cognitive resources to think calmly and rationally about what you need to do to tackle your anxiety.
Many people experience anxiety as emotionally paralyzing because no matter how hard they try, they don't feel they can do anything about their symptoms. This is not true, however: there are things that you can do! Anxiety treatment programs are often highly effective, even though these are commitments that require you to dedicate time and energy in order for them to be effective.
Physical Paralysis-Like Symptoms
Apart from the way that anxiety can affect our emotions, this disorder can also cause physical symptoms that resemble paralysis. You may experience a sense - in your face, arms, legs or torso - that you’re simply unable to move your body.
There are two reasons that this occurs. The first is hyperventilation. Hyperventilation is the act of breathing out too much carbon dioxide, so that your body responds by slowing down blood flow to certain areas of your body. This is what causes it to feel as though certain body parts can't move. They may start to tingle or feel numb, causing you to feel as though your muscles aren't working. Hyperventilation is triggered by anxiety; and it may maintain or worsen your anxiety as well.
The second issue is a bit more complex. Our bodies perform many movements automatically. These include, for example, blinking, swallowing, smiling or moving out of the way of an approaching vehicle. Your mind sends signals down your nerves for how to move, and you move them. When you walk, even if you are thinking about walking, you generally don't focus on literally each muscle movement one at a time. Walking - like all movements - are unconscious and controlled by your mind.
When someone suffers from anxiety, they often focus deeply on the way their body feels, becoming highly attuned and conscious of movements which would otherwise be performed spontaneously and automatically. The process of actively contemplating the series of movements that you’re performing may interfere with the automatic process whereby those actions would normally be carried out. This may make automatic movements harder to perform, creating a sense of immobilization.
These issues are never permanent and not something you need to concern yourself with too much, but they do make it feel as though something is wrong with your muscles or body, and that can increase your anxiety in the future.
We often talk about the fight or flight response, because anxiety is directly linked to that response. But for some people, it is not as simple as “fight or flight.” For some people, they experience a drive to fight, flight, or even freeze.
The analogy is of the “deer in the headlights.” When a deer is about to be hit by a car, it doesn’t run or otherwise fight in any way: rather, it freezes. That freezing - while not the best course of action when a car is coming your way - is an evolutionary adaptation because in nature, sometimes remaining perfectly still minimizes your chances of being spotted by a predator.
That response is not limited to deer. Lots of animals have it, and so do humans. So, if you’re faced with extreme fear or panic and you feel like you can’t move at all, you may be experiencing the “Freeze” response.
Remember, anxiety really is something you can beat. But you need to make sure you're committed to your treatment plan and willing to do what it takes to combat your anxiety once and for all. Whether it’s therapy/counseling, medications (speak to your doctor or psychiatrist first), self-help, or some other method, anxiety is a manageable condition that responds well to treatment. You just need to make the first step.
SUMMARY: You can be emotionally and physically paralyzed by fear in some ways. Anxiety acts differently in each individual, including issues that relate to hyperawareness. Only reducing anxiety has the ability to stop this type of symptom.
Do you have a specific question that this article didn’t answered? Send us a message and we’ll answer it for you!
Where can I go to learn more about Jacobson’s relaxation technique and other similar methods? – Anonymous patient
You can ask your doctor for a referral to a psychologist or other mental health professional who uses relaxation techniques to help patients. Not all psychologists or other mental health professionals are knowledgeable about these techniques, though. Therapists often add their own “twist” to the technqiues. Training varies by the type of technique that they use. Some people also buy CDs and DVDs on progressive muscle relaxation and allow the audio to guide them through the process. – Timothy J. Legg, PhD, CRNP
Fact Checked by Denise Griswold, MSc, LCAS Updated on October 10, 2020.
Many things can contribute to anxiety and anxiety symptoms. In some cases these issues may cause anxiety directly. In other...
Fact Checked by Victoria LeBlanc, MS, LCPC Updated on October 10, 2020.
Speaking anxiety is incredibly common. For many, it represents simply a fear of public speaking - also known as glossophobia....
Fact Checked by Daniel Sher, MA, Clin Psychology Updated on October 10, 2020.
Anxiety is linked to fear and the triggering of your fight-or-flight system. Fear itself is a natural, even healthy experience....
Seasonal anxiety disorder is an unusual condition. During specific seasons - usually winter, but not always - a person experiences...
Fact Checked by Wendy M Yoder, Ph.D. Updated on October 10, 2020.
Anemia is caused by the body not generating enough healthy red blood cells, either because the blood cells are not...
Fact Checked by Sally-Anne Soameson, Psychiatrist Updated on October 10, 2020.
No one likes living with acne. It pops up for seemingly no reason, and causes a great deal of self...
Written by Micah Abraham, BSc Updated on October 10, 2020.
Premenopause is a stressful time in a woman's life. The hormonal shifts that take place in your body during pre-...
Sign up for our newsletter and get science-backed tips to better manage anxiety and boost your mental health. Nurture yourself with mental health advice that’s rooted in medical expertise.
Your privacy is important to us. Any information you provide to us via this website may be placed by us on servers located in countries outside of the EU. If you do not agree to such placement, do not provide the information.
🍪 Pssst, we have Cookies!
We use Cookies to give you the best online experience. More information can be found here . By continuing you accept the use of Cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
Amid deep concern about Biden’s capacity to continue as the nominee, party leaders are confronting the options and obstacles.
Listen to this article
Produced by ElevenLabs and News Over Audio (NOA) using AI narration.
T he ground may be starting to shift under President Joe Biden after his scattered and sometimes disoriented debate performance last week.
Across the party, widespread agreement is emerging that Biden’s chances of beating Donald Trump have dramatically diminished. “No one I have talked to believes Biden is going to win this race anymore: nobody,” said one longtime Democratic pollster working in a key battleground state who, like almost all of the party insiders I interviewed for this article, asked for anonymity to discuss the situation candidly.
That reticence about going public was symptomatic. A general reluctance to publicly express those concerns, or to urge Biden to step aside, has been obvious—particularly because the White House has pushed back fiercely against critics, and many senior Democrats have issued supportive, if not ironclad, statements. And even some of those Democrats who considered Biden’s performance calamitous continue to believe that replacing him with Vice President Kamala Harris or another candidate would endanger the party’s chances more than staying the course.
“Universally we’re in this state of suspended animation,” the leader of a prominent Democratic advocacy group told me.
Read: Biden’s delegates are flirting with a breakup
But the first signs that this paralysis may be lifting are appearing. Representative Mike Quigley of Illinois suggested yesterday that Biden may need to consider leaving the race; Representative Lloyd Doggett of Texas also called on him to do so yesterday, as did former Representative Tim Ryan , the party’s 2022 Senate candidate in Ohio, and Julián Castro, a rival for the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination. A senior House Democrat told me that many colleagues who are running in competitive districts express similar views and concerns in private. “The frontliners are melting down,” this high-ranking representative told me.
Notably, former Speaker Nancy Pelosi defended Biden on MSNBC yesterday, but acknowledged that after the debate, “It’s a legitimate question to say: Is this an episode or is this a condition?” (She said that question should apply to both candidates.) Democratic Senator Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island likewise said that Biden must provide reassurance about his cognitive and physical abilities.
Despite these first few individuals going public with their doubts, no organized effort has yet coalesced in the party to encourage or pressure Biden to leave the race. Most Democrats feel helpless to affect Biden’s decision, even as they grow more concerned that his vulnerabilities may be paving the way to a Trump victory that would create an existential threat not only to the party’s policy priorities but to American democracy itself.
That’s the overwhelming conclusion from my conversations over the past few days with a broad cross section of Democratic leaders, including members of Congress, the directors of several major advocacy and constituency groups, large donors, and longtime pollsters and strategists.
“I think it’s a collective-action problem, where no one wants to go first, but as soon as someone does, it is going to feed on itself,” one prominent Democratic fundraiser told me.
P ublicly , the furthest that almost all Democrats have been willing to push Biden has been to call on him to schedule a flurry of voter town halls and media interviews through which he could try to offset the flailing and vacant impression that his debate performance left. “He needs to relentlessly speak to the American public in unscripted events over the next week,” Jim Kessler, the executive vice president for policy at Third Way, a centrist Democratic group that has led this push, told me. “The only way to replace a bad impression is with a good one. Success with unscripted events like town halls and press conferences can show that the debate was an anomaly.”
Biden’s campaign has scheduled an interview with George Stephanopoulos on ABC and a campaign appearance in Wisconsin, both on Friday, but it hasn’t announced anything like the volume of appearances that Third Way and others have urged; overall, the president’s schedule this week is light on public events. On Monday night, Biden gave very brief remarks responding to the decision handed down by the Supreme Court’s Republican majority that provides presidents with broad immunity for their actions in office.
The fact that Biden has not already announced such high-profile unscripted interactions is being interpreted by those worried about Biden’s prospects as confirmation of their fears. “You would have thought they would have quickly put together a roundtable with steelworkers, which is relatively safe, or have Shawn Fain pull together something with autoworkers,” the director of the advocacy group told me, referring to the United Auto Workers president. “Anything where he can be seen in conversation with people ... and people will see he can function without a script. They haven’t done it, because clearly, he can’t.” This official also noted how little Biden has interacted with the media in office and said the White House has virtually shut off small meetings between the president and key groups in the Democratic coalition.
One leader of a major liberal advocacy group told me that the organization viewed a gantlet of public events for Biden as a win-win proposition for the party. Either he performs well and eases concerns about his capacity, this official said, or he performs badly and explodes the idea that his debate performance was the result of a bad night—an idea that no one I spoke with, in fact, accepts.
This official at the liberal advocacy group told me that many in the party were focusing on the way Representative Jim Clyburn of South Carolina, one of Biden’s staunchest congressional allies, has phrased his support for the president since the debate. Clyburn has analogized Biden’s poor showing to a single strike during an at-bat, saying , “If this were a ball game, he’s got two more swings.”
The official said that some Democrats are taking that to mean Clyburn could urge Biden to step aside if the president continues to struggle in public settings. The high-ranking House Democrat I spoke with said that nervous members in competitive districts similarly view Clyburn—whose endorsement at a crucial moment in the primary was vital to Biden’s 2020 nomination—as the congressional leader with the greatest capacity to influence the president’s decision. Clyburn, this Democrat told me, has been telling those members to wait and see how Biden performs in the coming days. But, the Democrat added, Clyburn has also frustrated vulnerable members by so emphatically defending Biden in public, which they feel has limited their room to take a more critical stance.
Clyburn’s office did not respond to a request for comment on whether Democratic allies are correctly interpreting his three-strikes comments as a signal that he may be willing to break with Biden, if more episodes suggesting incapacity occur.
The president of another Democratic constituency group told me that multiple factors are discouraging activists from airing concerns about Biden, despite private anxieties that have exploded since the debate. “I don’t see anyone, whether it’s an elected official or nongovernmental organization, getting out there publicly saying he needs to go,” this official told me. “A: It’s not going to matter if we say it; and B: If he does win, we’re totally cut off from any conversation. So what’s the point?”
The group president continued: “I can say privately, and I have said it—I think it would be better if he was replaced. It’s a risky move but we are in a dark place, and I think it would be better if it’s someone else. It almost doesn’t matter who it would be. But none of us are going to say that publicly.”
This constituency-group leader and several others told me that a big part of the challenge in coalescing any organized pressure on Biden is that though virtually everyone agrees the debate weakened the president’s chances of beating Trump, no one can say that Biden has no chance of winning—or that a replacement candidate would surely run better. In addition, Biden is benefiting from the same dynamic that allowed Trump to once confidently claim that he could shoot someone on Fifth Avenue without losing any support: Most of the electorate is so dug in at this point that almost nothing could move them toward supporting the other party.
G enerally , public and private polling so far has not shown a collapse for Biden in the horse-race numbers against Trump. A national USA Today /Suffolk University survey released yesterday showed Trump slightly widening his lead to three percentage points; a CNN survey conducted by SRSS , also released yesterday, showed Trump holding a daunting six-point advantage, but that survey has typically been the worst major poll for Biden, and Trump’s lead was no larger than in the survey’s previous result, in April. A national CBS/YouGovAmerica poll released today put Trump’s lead at two percentage points, a statistically insignificant one-point decline from its previous survey.
Biden’s team has put forward its own campaign pollsters, Geoff Garin and Molly Murphy, to argue that the debate did not materially change the race. Garin and Murphy are widely respected in the party, but the Democratic strategists worried about Biden’s chances say that this optimism ignores two key messages from even a best-case reading of the polling.
One is that even a status-quo polling result after the debate leaves Biden on track to a probable defeat. Democrats almost universally agree that Biden’s campaign sought this early debate because it understood that he was losing and needed to change the dynamics of the race. Party strategists believe he has fallen almost out of range in his southeastern target states of Georgia and North Carolina, and faces a substantial, if less insurmountable, deficit in his southwestern targets of Arizona and Nevada.
Even before the debate, Biden’s most plausible path to 270 Electoral College votes was to sweep the three former “blue wall” states of Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. But before last week, most Democrats viewed his odds as no better than 50–50 in any of them—and the odds of winning all three below that (the chance of three successive coin flips falling on the same side is only one in eight).
The Democratic pollster working in one of these blue-wall states told me that his initial post-debate polling shows Trump slightly widening a lead he had taken in the weeks before the encounter. The question after the debate, this pollster said, was not whether Biden could stay within range of Trump (as the White House argues he can), but whether the president now could ever find the last few thousand votes he would need to overcome his Republican opponent.
“I don’t know where he gets the votes—his favorable ratings are so bad,” the pollster told me. “I think his odds in this state, which were probably getting close to 50–50 at best, are now at least two to one against.” (Another set of post-debate poll results from a different pollster circulating among liberal groups that was shared with me last night also found Biden’s deficit widening to an ominous level in these key states.)
The pollster’s comments point to the second polling problem facing Biden: The top-line number in polls, which generally show Trump ahead, is typically the best result for Biden. His standing in all the subsidiary polling metrics is almost without exception weaker. In yesterday’s CNN survey, for instance, Biden’s job-approval rating fell to 36 percent, the lowest level that poll has recorded for him. More than seven in 10 voters in the survey said that Biden’s physical and mental ability was a reason to vote against him.
The longtime Democratic pollster Stanley Greenberg, the senior campaign pollster in Bill Clinton’s 1992 victory, over the weekend released so-called dial groups tracking moment-by-moment voter reactions to the debate from Democratic-leaning groups that are not fully committed to Biden, including younger, Hispanic, and Black voters, as well as those considering support for a third-party candidate.
These respondents went into the debate supporting Biden by two to one, Greenberg reported, and Trump did nothing in the debate to improve their preponderantly negative perceptions of him. Those watching gave Biden credit on some fronts, such as standing up for the middle class, but “when asked the overall impression, the first was on his cognitive and physical fitness, expressing concern about his age, mental acuity, saying words, ‘confused,’ and ‘frail,’” Greenberg wrote. “Then, they commented on difficulty articulating his thoughts and his train of thought.” By his account, almost two-thirds of these Democratic-leaning voters concluded that he was too old to be president, with most of them “strongly” agreeing with that proposition.
“Those doubts make it pretty certain that he is going to … be behind in almost all the Electoral College states,” Greenberg told me. “You are going to go into the convention with that backdrop. In a very difficult year, it has become dramatically more difficult.”
A final line of defense for Biden is that even many Democrats who accept that he has been badly hurt remain uncertain that removing him would improve the party’s chances against Trump. The pollster working in one of the blue-wall states told me that although House and Senate candidates are alarmed about Biden’s position, “I think they are scared to death about Kamala. And they are scared to death about the fight. There isn’t a grand plan.”
The high-ranking House Democratic member told me that the party leadership in the chamber has given no indication that it would push for Biden to step aside—but it has signaled that if he does, the leadership will seek to quickly unify behind Harris as the alternative. (Likewise, Clyburn declared yesterday that he’d urge the party to consolidate behind Harris if Biden withdraws.) Other Democrats have noted that under campaign-finance rules, only Harris could utilize the $240 million in cash that the Biden ticket has stockpiled (although some believe that another candidate could find a way to access that money).
Adam Serwer: Biden must resign
The prospect of Harris replacing Biden, as I’ve previously written , deeply divides Democrats. One reason Biden didn’t face much pressure to drop out earlier is the double fear many of his critics have that she can’t win either, yet that denying the nomination to the first woman of color would tear the party apart.
Still, based on my conversations, even some of those skeptical of Harris are moving toward the belief that she presents a better bet than continuing with a diminished Biden. “People have seen something they can’t unsee about this guy. And his performance will not get better; it won’t,” the official at the liberal advocacy group told me. “Harris is better. She has the ability to rally the troops and create some energy with turnout in these places in a way that Joe Biden can’t.” The former Senate candidate Ryan, a centrist popular in Democratic circles usually skeptical of Harris, made similar points in his social-media posts yesterday. “ @VP has significantly grown into her job, she will destroy Trump in debate, highlight choice issue, energize our base, bring back young voters and give us generational change,” he wrote .
If Biden steps aside, plenty of influential Democrats would prefer the party to pass over Harris as well, for other alternatives such as Governor Gretchen Whitmer of Michigan or Governor Gavin Newsom of California. “I don’t think everybody is going to step aside,” James Carville, the longtime party strategist, said when I appeared on his podcast yesterday. With the Sun Belt swing states already moving out of reach, many Democratic strategists fear that Harris could not win nearly enough of the working-class white voters essential to success in the Rust Belt.
Other Democrats, though, are dubious that any major party figure would enlist in a contest with Harris for the nomination, a confrontation that would inevitably be racially fraught, especially given the uncertain prospect that anyone who succeeds Biden could beat Trump. With that in mind, the finding in yesterday’s CNN survey that Harris, though still trailing, was polling better against Trump than Biden definitely raised eyebrows among Democrats. If Biden’s skeptics scale the mountain of removing him from the ticket, they may conclude that accepting Harris, with all her own limitations, is a more plausible option than climbing the second mountain of dislodging her too.
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Paralysis is one of the ways our body responds to stress, and there's ways to manage it. Living with anxiety engages your autonomic nervous system (ANS), also known as the fight, flight, or ...
Dysarthria happens when the muscles used for speech are weak or are hard to control. Dysarthria often causes slurred or slow speech that can be difficult to understand. Common causes of dysarthria include conditions that affect the nervous system or that cause facial paralysis. These conditions may cause tongue or throat muscle weakness.
Anxiety causes both physical and mental issues that can affect speech. These include: Shaky Voice Perhaps the most well-known speech issue is simply a shaky voice. When you're talking, it feels like your voice box is shaking along with the rest of your body (and it is). That can make it sound like it is cracking or vibrating, both of which are ...
Difficulty speaking, talking, moving mouth, tongue, or lips anxiety symptoms descriptions: Having difficulty or unusual awkwardness speaking; pronouncing words, syllables, or vowels. Having difficulty moving your mouth, tongue, or lips. Suddenly become self-conscious of your problems talking, speaking, moving your mouth, tongue, or lips.
Emotionally Paralyzed With Anxiety. In addition to the physical feelings of anxiety, you may also feel emotionally paralyzed by anxiety. This can make it difficult to cope with what you are feeling and can interfere with relationships and other areas of life. When you are emotionally paralyzed by anxiety, you might avoid all anxiety-provoking ...
Muscle Tension Anxiety also causes significant muscle tension. Muscle tension can make it harder to move mouth muscles, which of course is the main cause of slurred speech in most other conditions. Over-Awareness An interesting problem with anxiety is the way it makes you over-aware of what would otherwise be subconscious/automatic behaviors.
Work Your Way Up When possible, you should strongly consider starting with smaller speaking engagements and working your way up to the number of people you talk to/in front of. Speaking in front of 3 people is much different than speaking in front of 300. At some point you'll find your anxiety increases.
Also known as glossophobia, public speaking anxiety can cause physical symptoms such as an elevated heart rate, shortness of breath, and even panic attacks. Therapy and medication are effective ...
Conversion disorder (also known as functional neurological symptom disorder) is a psychological condition that causes symptoms that appear to be neurological, such as paralysis, speech impairment, or tremors, but with no obvious or known organic causes. In the past, these events were often referred to as "hysterical blindness" or "hysterical ...
Whether it's public speaking, social situations, or challenging tasks at work, understanding your triggers is the first step towards overcoming anxiety paralysis. Practice deep breathing and relaxation techniques: When anxiety strikes, our bodies often respond with shallow breathing and tense muscles.
Developing a calming breathing practice and utilizing it when experiencing paralyzing anxiety helps regulate the nervous system and bring it from a frozen state to a calm state. Try using the 4-7-8 breathing method, breathing in through your nose for 4 counts and out through your mouth for 8 counts and repeat. 4. 5.
Case 1: referred to speech pathology, ENT, and psychiatry for evaluation. Had post-traumatic stress disorder, underwent psychotherapy Case 2: referred to speech therapy and psychiatry. Evaluation showed anxiety disorder and histrionic personality: 2 female military personnel diagnosed with VCD while on active duty: Patient's reports on state ...
Weakness or coordination and balance problems. Abnormal vision. Confusion. Seizures. A brain tumor is an abnormal growth of cells in the brain. A brain tumor may be cancerous (malignant) or noncancerous (benign). Both types can cause symptoms including slurred speech.
Sedatives and tranquilizers: Sedatives and tranquilizers are commonly prescribed to treat anxiety, insomnia, and certain neurological conditions. These medications work by depressing the central nervous system, which can result in slowed speech and impaired coordination. ... Muscle weakness and paralysis, damage to the speech centers in the ...
vocal tremor, spasmodic dysphonia, or. vocal fold paralysis. Functional —voice disorders that result from inefficient use of the vocal mechanism when the physical structure is normal, such as. vocal fatigue, muscle tension dysphonia or aphonia, diplophonia, or. ventricular phonation. Voice quality can also be affected when psychological ...
The Houston Methodist Speech & Language Center diagnoses and treats complex cases of dysphonia, a condition that interferes with the normal sound of the voice. It can also impact speech, swallowing and breathing. Your voice is your connection to the world, and dysphonia — a vocal cord paralysis or spasm disorder — makes communication ...
As we have explained, speaking anxiety is a normal reaction. Good speakers can get nervous, too, just as poor speakers do. Telling a joke or two is always a good way to begin a speech. Humor is some of the toughest material to deliver effectively because it requires an exquisite sense of timing.
It can also help increase confidence and self-esteem whilst reducing anxiety when communicating with others. What would speech and language therapy treatment for vocal cord paralysis involve? Speech and language therapy treatment may involve assessments, reports, reviews, therapy programmes, support groups, training, advice and education. ...
Anxiety can also cause paralysis-like physical symptoms, though should not cause actual paralysis. Severe anxiety, such as with a strong phobia, can lead to someone feeling stuck in place and possibly even fainting, which may feel like being paralyzed. By definition, this type of symptom is difficult to treat as an independent entity.
T he ground may be starting to shift under President Joe Biden after his scattered and sometimes disoriented debate performance last week.. Across the party, widespread agreement is emerging that ...
Marine Le Pen's party came a shock third in the second round of parliamentary elections, according to exit polls. A Left-wing coalition came first and French president Emmanuel Macron Ensemble ...
A grieving husband has been awarded £1 million compensation from the NHS after his wife died when medics dismissed her hidden heart condition as anxiety.. Rose Fuentebaja, 40, a nurse and mother ...
Nurse, 40, died after medics dismissed hidden heart condition as anxiety Watch: Bus going to Bellingham cheered by England fans after Euros semi-final Israel tells 'everyone in Gaza City' to leave
Leaders are encouraged by the fact that Ukraine is in a better position in its two-year-plus war with Russia than it was three months ago, even if deep concerns remain about its long-term prospects.