thesis statement for get out movie

Under the Fridge

Take a little trip; pack up your mind

“Get Out” Analysis: Themes, Motifs, and Real-World Connections

I just saw the movie  Get Out last night, and have spent a lot of time since thinking really hard about it.

It was an incredibly dense experience, with subtle hints and not-so-subtle clues all over the place.

A lot of people have already pointed to the overarching themes of the film.

I’m not really here to talk about that. What I wanted to do was touch on several things I picked up, how I tied it to modern society, and what the justification was for me doing so.

Let’s get right to it:

Oh, wait–

*SUPER DUPER SPOILER ALERT*

Okay, here we go:

The Opening Scene

Usually, people are afraid of walking at night in a sketchy neighborhood.

Andre is walking in an apparently affluent neighborhood, and is still afraid.

This reflects how Black people never, ever feel completely safe in America. Because, while you can leave a bad neighborhood, we can never leave being Black.

The Deer Metaphor

I think Jordan Peele put this early in the film to serve as what school teachers would call a “gimme”.

In other words, the Deer symbolism was a placement test. Anyone who didn’t catch the blatant connection between Chris and Deer (especially after Dean’s obvious “this-is-about-Black-people” rant) probably wouldn’t get the rest of the film’s symbolism, and would instead just see the whole thing as Invasion of the Body Snatchers or some shit like that.

The use of a silver spoon as a controlling device

Missy’s bitch ass primarily used a teacup with a silver spoon to hypnotize her (typically Black) victims.

The “Silver Spoon” motif has been classically used to embody economic privilege, which the Armitage’s clearly have. The real-world connection here is a how White society has always used its economic advantages to render the Black population powerless to control its own destiny.

The entire “Hypocritical White Liberal” theme went completely over my head

A lot of writers and critics have described how Get Out is a commentary on modern Liberal Whites who are just as harmful as overt racists.

I didn’t quite catch that during my own viewing, but I know why.

Most of these critics are White, and so they’ve projected their own backgrounds and experiences into the film. They saw friends, family members, and coworkers who have all behaved like the people at the cocktail party. They probably know people who are just like the Armitages behind closed doors.

In my eyes, the things said during the cocktail party are nothing new. Much like how Chris brushed it off as another day at the office—so did I.

So yeah. I see how this theme would be communicated, but it didn’t jump out at me entirely.

That Asian Guy

Make no mistake: this wasn’t an arbitrary casting decision.

The presence of an Asian person at the cocktail party echoes the preaching of Triangulation Theory, which outlines how Asians are generally thought to be above Blacks in contemporary society while still being below White people.

His question to Chris about whether he felt more advantaged or disadvantaged being Black was also very deliberately written. The line highlights the “in between-ness” of “Model Minority” Asians in the US. The man asked Chris this question because he literally had no clue.

It seems like Jordan Peele is expressing grief of how Asian Americans sometimes criticize Black society as being a victim of its own action without stopping to realize how little they actually understand.

I think this highlights a common concern among Black people when interacting with Asians who might have an idea of Black plight in America, but lack any intimate firsthand experience of it.

Well played.

The significance of Jim Hudson’s blindness

Did you notice how Jim’s first interaction with Chris was one of immediate understanding? Me too.

Jim is fully aware of how ignorant the cocktail party attendants are, and instantly forms a bond with Chris (and the audience) by doing so.

Now, there’s a few things that I think are going on here.

First, this highlights how, when it comes to American society, a Black person will only ever be on common ground with a White person who is impaired. I think the this encounter taking place with Jim sitting by himself while surrounded by several empty chairs only makes this more likely.

Second, the scene might communicate that a White person could only ever have an understanding conversation with a Black person if they cannot see the world through privileged eyes.

Speaking of the cocktail party…

The color coordination of this entire movie was meticulously planned out. This was obvious.

However, the whole color scheme reached a crescendo (like most other elements) during the cocktail party.

Everyone arriving in a train of black cars created the ambiance that they were attending a funeral. Okay, also obvious.

Here’s what I noticed: every single attendant of the party wore a combination of Black, White, and Red—except a few.

Chris is the only character wearing blue, which makes him stand out even more than he already does.

Both Dean and Missy are wearing brown—but so is Logan/Andre, which I found particularly interesting.

“Logan” wearing brown serves as an indicator for his quasi-assimilation into White society. The significance here is that the color scheme tips us off to his Whitewashing without him ever having to say anything. Just something I picked up.

The “Fruit Loops” Deal

You’ve probably all heard this one by now.

Blah blah, separating white from coloreds, blah blah.

Rose’s character flip

I was able to pick this one up due to personal experience.

There’s more to Rose’s sudden character shift besides being a scheming hoe and finally showing her true face.

Her history of hunting down Black people to return home is a reflection of Black men being fetishized in modern society.

Every now and then, I encounter a White woman who only seems to view me as a sort of prize or trophy. Something to show her friends and family while saying “Look what I’ve caught!”

The real truncating here is how Rose seemed to be a well-meaning person up until the film’s third act.

The message aligns with the movie’s main theme of White people hiding classic racist beliefs behind a veil of progressivism.

The Presence of Uncle Toms

Yeah, I know that we eventually find out the servants are just the Grandparents controlling Black bodies.

But when it comes to this movie, there’s a distinction between the plot and what the plot points are supposed to represent.

The “Tom” caricature is that of a Black person who is completely eager to serve White society.

When Chris speaks to both Georgina and Walter, they both say how they are completely happy doing their duties for the Armitages with big smiles on their faces.

This isn’t just to creep us out.

After we find out that Georgina and Walter carry the consciousness of the Armitage grandparents, we are forced to face the fact that the Tom stereotype is considered the optimal fate for Blacks in America.

Happy servants who are blissful in their fate—this is what the Armitage family is working towards with their Black captives.

“Logan”/Andre represents a modern day Tom character. Today, Black people will use the “Tom” term to label another Black person as a sellout. Logan is dating a White woman, speaks in an oddly proper manner, and rejects Chris’ attempts to connect over their “Blackness”—notably his adamancy with giving Chris a handshake instead of a fist bump.

The fact that we see Andre get abducted early in the film and is subsequently Whitewashed helps bolster his status as a modern Tom.

Which leads me to…

The most poignant moment of the film

Nothing stood out to me more than a particular interaction between Chris and Georgina.

While Chris is talking to Georgina about her life at the Armitage residence, she starts shedding tears while speaking to him.

Again—the plot would suggest that the ‘actual’ Georgina is trying to escape captivity, which is communicated through the tears.

To me, this scene reflected the guilt many Black people experience when they change how they present themselves in order to fit in with White society. When a Whitewashed Black person encounters a more “typical” Black person, they can’t help but feel a sense of self-betrayal.

That’s what I saw in Georgina’s tears—a Black person who hates what they’ve become, but must continue to be that way in order to be accepted.

Alright, that about wraps up what I’ve come up with. Let me know if you have anything else you’d like to add.

Thanks for reading.

5 Replies to ““Get Out” Analysis: Themes, Motifs, and Real-World Connections”

I really enjoyed reading this! Lots of things I didn’t pick up on that make sense to me now so thank you 🙂

• Pingback: Blog Post #2 – Engl. 1102

“It seems like Jordan Peele is expressing grief of how Asian Americans sometimes criticize Black society as being a victim of its own action without stopping to realize how little they actually understand.”

“I think this highlights a common concern among Black people when interacting with Asians who might have an idea of Black plight in America, but lack any intimate firsthand experience of it.”

Wow. Way to brush over years of black-AA conflict by doing the work for white people: pitting two POC communities against one another.

I fell that the scene with the fruit loops isn’t about separating the whites from the colors. its to give a bit of foreshadowing to the spoon on the glass. if Rose was to eat cereal out of a glass bowl with a metal spoon, then everyone in the sunken place would snap out of their trans.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Race in Popular Culture: “Get Out” (2017) Essay (Movie Review)

• To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
• As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
• As a template for you assignment

Introduction

Description of the themes, academic context, works cited.

The topic of racism is not new to the American population. The history of this phenomenon has century-long roots, and over time, many opinions and attitudes have developed. This research paper will focus attention on the way popular culture depicts the idea of racial inequality through a content analysis of the movie Get Out . The 2017 film was directed by Jordan Peele and stars Daniel Kaluuya as Chris Washington, a young man who experiences certain changes and specific treatment due to the color of his skin. When a black photographer meets the family of his white girlfriend, he cannot begin to guess how dangerous and strange all the members of the household, including the servants, are. Along with a number of horror scenes, a theme of racism develops, turning the concept into a demon of the 21st century. Modern parties are compared to slave auctions of the past, and a fascination for black skin color proves the power of the white race’s decision-making. As Get Out is a unique example of popular culture, the content analysis of this film shows how crucial the idea of racism is through the prism of human relations and police regulations.

The content analysis of the movie was developed in several stages. First, it was necessary to choose scenes where racism is properly depicted. For example, an early scene shows a young black man talking on a phone and demonstrating mild indignation about the name of the street and the location of this “creepy, confusing-ass suburb” where he feels like “a sore thumb” ( Get Out ). In the end, he is kidnapped by an unknown person in a car. This scene raises the idea that despite evident progress and a lack of obvious racial bias, black people continue to feel uncomfortable in areas where only white people live.

The situation when a police officer asks a passenger for his driver’s license provides evidence that racial prejudice exists in different regions of the United States. A young woman, Rose, expresses concern to her boyfriend about the policeman’s disrespect and tries to change the situation. She tells him that “you don’t have to give him your ID because you haven’t done anything wrong,” and that it is “bullshit” to ask for IDs “anytime there is an incident” ( Get Out ). Although many people, like Rose, have already discarded racial bias, American society still has many racists and other prejudiced people.

During the party, a climax in the discussion of racial issues is shown. In this scene, a white guest begins sharing his opinion about skin color and its role in the modern world. Chris finds it strange to hear that “people want to change. Some people want to be stronger, faster, cooler. Black is in fashion” ( Get Out ). On the one hand, such a phrase could be used to underline whatever benefits black people receive. On the other hand, the desire of a white man to see everything through the eyes of a black man shows his egocentrism and selfishness. In addition, the family focuses on the presidency of Obama as one of the best examples in their lifetime.

Finally, communication between Chris and a black servant, Georgina, was chosen as part of a sampling strategy to discuss black-white relationships. In the movie, the woman shares her thoughts about situations involving “too many white people,” which make her nervous ( Get Out ). At the same time, she underlines that the Armitages have been good to her. Doubtful and uncertain attitudes are evoked in both the character and the audience.

The themes of white-black relationships and the role of the police in racial judgments comprise the two major topics for a thorough discussion. This choice is explained by the necessity to combine human feelings and social norms under which behaviors and relationships are developed. The treatment by police officers or other representatives of the law toward black people varies depending on the decisions of other people. To comprehend better the idea of race and its history, it is important to pay attention to collective and individual thoughts and attitudes.

Racism is always a negative quality, regardless of the population it influences and the outcomes it reaches. However, in discussing racism through the prism of horror movies, its impact is difficult to predict and to understand. In Get Out , racism is not the major topic, but it helps the viewer to gain an understanding of the motives of the characters and the ways they prefer to establish relationships. As stated, the movie depicts the central idea of race in the phrase, used by a white man, that “black is in fashion” ( Get Out ). Notably, black people are not said to be respected or recognized as a race equal to the white race. Although Obama is defined as the best president for the United States, no reasons or additional explanations are given as if this is simply a commonly spoken phrase in the depicted family. Finally, Chris’s desire to know whether Rose’s parents know about the color of his skin shows the fact that sometimes people’s reactions are unpredictable. Any chance to prevent complications or warn about racial differences must be seized.

In addition to everyday human relationships, the attitude of the law toward racism cannot be ignored. The movie contains a short but informative scene with a policeman that demonstrates the potential cruelty and unfairness of people’s judgments. This type of racism may not be obvious, but it cannot be ignored because it also determines black people’s behaviors. In the scene, Rose is driving the car and hits a deer crossing the road. She calls the police and discusses the situation. Even after clarification, the responding policeman asks Chris for his driver’s license, then begins to stutter as he realizes the racial bias evident in his request. At last, he returns the license without looking at it or Chris (see fig. 1). In this situation, Chris has to behave calmly to avoid causing any negative reaction. He follows all instructions and does not find it necessary to disagree or debate, compared to his girlfriend who is eager to protect him and who talks to the officer without restraint.

Both themes in the movie contribute to the discussion about race and inequality. Many black children hear serious lectures from their parents about how to behave with police and how to respond to all official requests. White people are less concerned about the consequences of their communications with police as well as with black people. The level of responsibility, behavioral norms, and respect for each other vary between the representatives of the white and black races, and this paper aims to discuss some aspects of this topic.

Racial biases in human relationships, along with their legal justifications, emerge as serious themes for analysis in the movie Get Out . According to Nierenberg, Peele succeeds in highlighting and satirizing racism in America by “taking certain tropes to their exaggerated sci-fi/horror conclusions,” arguing about “black bodies and who owns them” (500). A slave auction at the party and the desire of a white man to possess the eye of a black man just to see what blacks see introduce the selfish side of the white nation and their compulsion to control everything, even the length of life. Landsberg defines this scene as “an astounding moment, a moment in which a pervasive post-racial discourse coexists with whites stripping African Americans of their civil rights and humanity” (638). Even as the characters express their recognition of the black president and his qualities, they are ready to bargain for his body, physical power, and other distinctive features.

The duty of the police is to make sure that all citizens follow the same rules and behave in accordance with existing laws. However, it is not always easy to prove the correctness of law enforcement actions. Banton says that people have tried “to make bad things better by change of name…to make things disappear by giving them bad names” (21). Although in the scene, such words as “race,” “skin,” or “origin” are not used, these concepts evidently bother all three characters at that moment. Therefore, Peele can easily call Banton’s words into question and prove that bad things never disappear. Boger shows that “black men are at once something to be ridiculed, something to be used for sports or military aims, to be jailed, and to be hated” (150). Even when are no reasons for imprisoning a person, a white man will always try to find another cause to uphold his attempt to control the black body physically or emotionally. Yancy underlines the importance of black resistance to white power in avoiding black people’s disappearance without a trace (1294). Thus, the movie serves as a call to action for black people.

It may be possible that even the creators of the movie Get Out could scarcely predict the impact that the theme of the race could have on this popular culture example. Instead of a cheap and predictable horror movie, the audience receives a captivating story about choices, dependence, and the desire to control everything. Compared to other modern horrors, Get Out reveals the idea that despite their intentions to be united and supportive, people cannot get rid of their racial biases and deeply rooted prejudice. It is possible to hide true intentions by a variety of means, but in the end, a final choice must be made: will the individual be a master or a slave? Racism can exist in different forms, and people are not able to recognize all of them even when confident in their powers and abilities. Black resistance has a long history, and Get Out provides a reminder of causes and outcomes that can be observed in human relationships, police behavior, and political change.

Banton, Michael. “The Concept of Racism”. Race and Racialism , edited by Sami Zubaida, Routledge, 2018, pp. 17-35.

Boger, Jillian. “Manipulations of Stereotypes and Horror Clichés to Criticize Post-Racial White Liberalism in Jordan Peele’s Get Out.” The Graduate Review , vol. 3, no. 1, 2018, pp. 149-158.

Get Out. Directed by Jordan Peele, performances by Daniel Kaluuya, Allison Williams, and Bradley Whitford, Universal Pictures, 2017.

Landsberg, Alison. “Horror Vérité: Politics and History in Jordan Peele’s Get Out (2017).” Continuum , vol. 32, no. 5, 2018, pp. 629-642.

Nierenberg, Andrew A. “Get Out.” Psychiatric Annals, vol. 48, no. 11, 2018, p. 500.

Yancy, George. “Moral Forfeiture and Racism: Why We Must Talk about Race.” Educational Philosophy and Theory , vol. 50, no. 13, 2018, 1293-1295.

• First Draft of Policeman of the World Paper
• The United States as a Policeman of the World
• American Movies: Racial and Gender Issues
• Roberta from "Desperately Seeking Susan" Film
• Ethical Dilemma in “The Reader” Film by S. Daldry
• "Newsies" by Kenny Ortega and the Industrial Revolution
• Alfred Hitchcock's "Psycho" Annotation
• "The Cabin in the Woods" Horror Comedy Film
• Chicago (A-D)
• Chicago (N-B)

IvyPanda. (2021, July 7). Race in Popular Culture: "Get Out" (2017). https://ivypanda.com/essays/race-in-popular-culture-get-out-film-analysis/

"Race in Popular Culture: "Get Out" (2017)." IvyPanda , 7 July 2021, ivypanda.com/essays/race-in-popular-culture-get-out-film-analysis/.

IvyPanda . (2021) 'Race in Popular Culture: "Get Out" (2017)'. 7 July.

IvyPanda . 2021. "Race in Popular Culture: "Get Out" (2017)." July 7, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/race-in-popular-culture-get-out-film-analysis/.

1. IvyPanda . "Race in Popular Culture: "Get Out" (2017)." July 7, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/race-in-popular-culture-get-out-film-analysis/.

Bibliography

IvyPanda . "Race in Popular Culture: "Get Out" (2017)." July 7, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/race-in-popular-culture-get-out-film-analysis/.

Press ESC to close

Crafting a Powerful Thesis Statement for a Movie Review: Examples and Tips

• backlinkworks
• Writing Articles & Reviews
• October 28, 2023

Introduction

writing a movie review can be an exciting task, but IT requires careful consideration and thought. One of the most important elements of a movie review is the thesis statement, as IT sets the tone and direction for the entire review. In this article, we will explore the process of crafting a powerful thesis statement for a movie review, providing you with helpful examples and tips along the way.

What is a Thesis Statement in a Movie Review?

A thesis statement in a movie review presents the main argument or opinion that you will be discussing and supporting throughout your review. IT typically appears near the end of your introduction and should be clear, concise, and thought-provoking. The thesis statement should provide an overall evaluation or interpretation of the movie, highlighting the key aspects you will be focusing on in your review.

Examples of Powerful Thesis Statements

Let’s now explore some examples of powerful thesis statements to give you a better understanding of how to structure your own. Remember, these examples are not meant to be copied directly but rather to serve as inspiration for crafting your unique thesis statement:

• Example 1: The movie “Inception” explores the convoluted depths of the human mind, challenging our perception of reality and leaving audiences questioning the nature of dreams.
• Example 2: Through its stunning cinematography and emotional storytelling, “The Shawshank Redemption” showcases the resilience of the human spirit and the power of hope in the face of adversity.
• Example 3: In “Black Swan,” the director delves into the dark and obsessive world of ballet, blurring the lines between sanity and insanity, leading to a mesmerizing and haunting cinematic experience.

Tips for Crafting a Powerful Thesis Statement

Now that you’ve seen some examples, let’s dive into some tips to help you craft a powerful thesis statement for your movie review:

• Identify the central theme: Analyze the movie and identify the central theme or message being conveyed. This will serve as the basis for your thesis statement.
• Be specific: Make your thesis statement clear and specific, avoiding vague language or generalizations. This will make your argument more compelling and focused.
• Consider the audience: Think about the intended audience of your review and tailor your thesis statement to resonate with them. Different audiences may have varying expectations or interests.
• Support with evidence: Your thesis statement should be supported by evidence from the movie. Incorporate specific scenes, dialogues, or character developments to strengthen your argument.
• Stay objective: While expressing your personal opinion is essential, ensure that your thesis statement remains objective and balanced. Avoid overly biased language that may detract from the credibility of your review.

Crafting a powerful thesis statement for a movie review is crucial in setting the tone and direction for your review. IT should provide a clear evaluation or interpretation of the movie, supported by evidence and examples. By following the tips outlined in this article and considering the provided examples, you can create a compelling thesis statement that engages your readers and enhances the overall quality of your movie review.

1. Can I include my personal opinion in the thesis statement?

Yes, you can include your personal opinion in the thesis statement, but ensure that IT remains objective and supported by evidence from the movie.

2. Should I mention the title of the movie in my thesis statement?

While IT is not mandatory, IT is recommended to include the title of the movie in your thesis statement to provide clarity and context.

3. How long should my thesis statement be?

A thesis statement should be concise and to the point. Aim for a sentence or two that effectively conveys your main argument.

4. Can I change my thesis statement after writing the review?

Yes, IT is possible to make adjustments to your thesis statement if you feel IT needs refinement or modification based on your analysis and review process.

Unlock the Secrets of Computer Science: A Beginner’s Guide to the World of Programming for Dummies

Finding the ideal solution: free web hosting for wordpress bloggers.

Recent Posts

• Driving Organic Growth: How a Digital SEO Agency Can Drive Traffic to Your Website
• Mastering Local SEO for Web Agencies: Reaching Your Target Market
• The Ultimate Guide to Unlocking Powerful Backlinks for Your Website
• SEO vs. Paid Advertising: Finding the Right Balance for Your Web Marketing Strategy
• Discover the Secret Weapon for Local SEO Success: Local Link Building Services

Popular Posts

Shocking Secret Revealed: How Article PHP ID Can Transform Your Website!

Unlocking the Secrets to Boosting Your Alexa Rank, Google Pagerank, and Domain Age – See How You Can Dominate the Web!

Uncovering the Top Secret Tricks for Mastering SPIP PHP – You Won’t Believe What You’re Missing Out On!

The Ultimate Collection of Free Themes for Google Sites

Discover the Shocking Truth About Your Website’s Ranking – You Won’t Believe What This Checker Reveals!

Explore topics.

• Backlinks (2,425)
• Blog (2,744)
• Computers (5,318)
• Digital Marketing (7,741)
• Internet (6,340)
• Website (4,705)
• Wordpress (4,705)
• Writing Articles & Reviews (4,208)

“Get Out” Horror Film by Jordan Peele

Get Out is a satirical horror directed by Jordan Peele in 2017. Get Out premiered on January 23, 2017, and was described as “a movie that plunges into white insecurities about black sexuality and the lingering toxicity of slavery on the national psyche” (Johnston 2). The film was a success and received the best awards for acting, writing, directing, and the themes are introduced to the public. In the era of Black Lives Matter, this film is the exact product concerning today’s most heated issue. The film is thought to be a “fantastically twisted and addictively entertaining horror-satire” (Bradshaw 1). Therefore, it has such elements as dramatic and situational irony, allegory, and even paradox.

Chris Washington, the main character, is a black photographer who is extremely anxious about meeting the family of his white girlfriend. Therefore, he continually asks her “Do they know I’m black?”(Peele, 2017). Rose’s dthe ad, Dean, typically makes inappropriate comments about people of color, so Chris is conscious about it. During the night, Chris witnesses the odd conduct of the home’s dark-skinned maid, Georgina, and maintenance person Walter. Later, Chris complains about his inability to sleep generally due to smoking, and Rose’s mother Missy, a hypnotherapist, decides to help him. The next morning Chris wakes up realizing he does not have a smoking addiction anymore.

Later on, many affluent white individuals show up for the Armitages’ annual social gathering. They express high estimation for Chris’ physical appearance. One of the guests, Jim Hudson, an impaired craftsmanship seller, takes a specific enthusiasm for Chris’ photography aptitudes. Chris meets another person of color, Logan King, who behaves oddly and dates the older white woman. Chris calls his friend, TSA administrator Rod Williams, about the curious occurrence Chris endeavors to capture a picture of Logan quietly, but when his glimmer goes off, Logan gets insane, telling Chris to “get out”. The rest of the guests get him, and Dean ensures that Logan had an epileptic seizure.The others catch him, and Dean assures him that hat Logan had an epileptic seizure. According to Kermode (2017) “gradually, inexorably, the cringe-inducing “liberal” awkwardness turns to something more sinister” (3). It turned out that under this annual meeting, people assumed the auction, which is an allegory forslave salee.

Away from the meeting, Chris convinces Rose that they must leave. Rhodes, having received the picture, perceives Logan as Andrea Hayworth missing. Suspecting the connivance, Rod appeals to the police, but the police officers disregard his speech. Here the audience hear such a phrase from the police officer: “This dude is from Brooklyn. He didn’t dress like this” (Peele, 2017). Thus, this saying can be interpreted as dramatic irony because their dialogue seems a little far-fetched. While Chris is about to leave, he discovers photographs of Rose in earlier associations with people of color, including Walter and Georgina, denying her case that Chris is her first black boyfriend. He tries to get out, but Rose and her family surround him. Chris attacks Jeremy; however, Missy uses the “trigger” that she turned on during his hypnosis, killing him.

Chris moves tied to a basement spot. In the video introduction, Grandfather Rose Roman explains that the family transplanted their brain into the bodies of others, giving them their preferred physical qualities and a curved type of eternal status. Hudson tells Chris that the presenter remains in the Sunken Place, knowledgeable but weak. Even though the family is mainly aimed at people of color, Hudson discovers that he needs Chris’s body only for sight. Missy casts a bewitching spell, making Chris pass out.

Chris hits Jeremy, stopping the hypnotist, covering his ears with a cotton seal stretched from the seat. He penetrates Dean with the fangs of a deer, causing Dean to light a match, setting fire to the workshop with the Hudson inside. Chris executes Missy, but Jeremy attacks him as he heads for the exit. He kills Jeremy and drives away in his car, but defeats Georgina. Remembering the passage of his mother, he delivers Georgina in the vehicle. In any case, under the control of Granny Marianne, she attacks him. During the battle, the car crashes and Georgina is dead.

Rose captures him with Walter, who is controlled by Roman. Chris utilizes the flash of his telephone to murder Roman, permitting Walter to recover control of his body. Walters Rose’s rifle fires her in the stomach, and shoots himself, slaughtering Roman. The next moment, people may notice the elements of a paradox when Rose was lying on the ground being strangled by Chris, she claims to love him despite her cold-blooded deed. The scene comes to an end when a police cruiser maneuvers on stage and Rod leaves the car to rescue Chris. The finale refers to situational irony, as Rod had nothing to do with the police; however, he saved his friend undercover.

Several main themes make up Get Out’s plot. First of all, slavery is a significant subject of getting Out . According to the source, “the film critiques the insidious racism that lurks just beneath a veneer of white liberal do-gooders” (Harris 4). The activity at the Armitage house reconsiders the foundation of property slavery. The individuals from the “Request for the Coagula,” established by Dean Armitage’s father use black people for their motivations. The senior member holds a quiet sell-out over who gets the chance to transplant their mind into Chris’ collection, a scene that brings attention back to the barter that took place inside the submission base.

Individuals of color are enticed, through either brutality or increasingly manipulative methods, to the house, where they are then misused. The same happened to Georgina and Walter who were deprived of their independence. Peele constrains us to face the inheritance of subjugation by envisioning a current variant of it. The structure has changed, yet the malignant aim is as yet the equivalent: to rule over a race.

The next theme concerns kidnapping and mainly relates to Andre being kidnapped at the beginning of the film which previously happened to Walter and Georgina. Their bodies are now occupied by the Armitages’ grandparents. Who is searching for these individuals? Many people are still nnot foundin America and it is worrying. This film brings up upsetting the truth: nobody is searching for those people.

Race is maybe the absolute most predominant subject in the film. From the earliest starting point, we see a world where the interracial connection between Rose and Chris represents a few inconsistencies. He asks Rose whether she told her parents that he was dark before taking him home. On their way to the house, Chris and Rose are pulled over by a white cop, who requests to see Chris’ ID. However, Rose decides to stand up for her boyfriend blaming the policeman for racial prejudice.

At the Armitage mansion, Chris’ race is thought to be not a “serious deal”, yet the family’s clumsiness about dark-skinned people now and again communicated through a determined emphasis all alone “wokeness,” turns into its bigotry. For example, Dean tells Chris that he “would have voted for Obama a third time if [he] could” and alludes to him as “my man” all through their visit (Peele, 2017). Missy discourteously treats Georgina, the black servant, and it feels as though Missy has some racial biases. Rose’s sibling, Jeremy, is probably the most agitating individual fromin family. He asked Chris uneasy questions provoking him to a battle. The film takes an eye-catching situation – a young colored man meets the family of his white lover – and continues to drive it into an increasingly creepy area until it becomes more and more terrifying.

As a film of blood and horror, Get Out is focused on the terrible events, be it hatred of ordinary people or more pronounced hatred of the laboratory that uses black people. From the first second, disgust and how these different people perceive the best places as “terrible” is the central theme of the film. The first few seconds show Andre, a man of color walking along a path in the suburbs at night. A group of people seems safe and reliable from the usual point of view. Still, we will soon realize that this white suburb is not suitable for a defenseless person of color. The car did drive up to Andre and the disguised driver pounced on him, knocking him down, and throwing him in the back seat.

Aversion continues to unfold from this point and keeps up until the rest of the film. To begin with, on the road to the north, Rose and Chris hit a deer with their car. The deer is symbolic here as Rose’s dad claims that he hates them, saying “I’m sick of it, they’re taking over, they’re like rats, and they’re destroying the ecosystem” (Peele, 2017). This expression can allude to eugenics’ representatives who wanted to wipe out the entire race. This is not a particularly extreme case, given that they pass through a lush area, but the second is surprising and frustrating, especially for Chris, who leads. At this point, the house begins to sicken the viewer, from the empty grin of the black internal staff to Missy’s accent on Chris’s mesmerizing appeal to Dean’s bizarre use of ebony and his claim that he will decide in favor of Obama the third. Time. All of these little disgusts for Chris are deeply disturbing, and the film exceeds expectations, pointing out to the viewer how frivolous the bias of the regulator in itself is alarming.

The name alone uncovers to the viewer that the focal subject of the film will get away. Chris puts forth a strong attempt to exist together with the Armitage family the first hight, paying little mind to unavoidable hiccups. At the gathering the following day, nonetheless, after Chris snaps a photo of Logan with his camera, Logan appears to wake up in surprise and gets Chris, telling him: “Get out!” This is a startling admonition, as apparently, this is the genuine primary concern that Logan said in all the joint effort. Chris focuses on the notice and decides to leave when time permits, stunned by the experience and peculiar things that occurred. Despite the fact that he accepts that Rose will release him, it before long becomes obvious that she has been torturing him constantly and that he is the survivor of a perplexing, energizing trick. In the rest of the film, after Chris is found in a tornado shelter, his only wish is to escape.

The next topic is fixated on Chris and his “apparent prevalence.” While prejudice usually surrounds the impression of a different race as a parameter, Get Out revealed white characters’ interest in black bodies, much closer to envy and predation than to rapture. The dignitary tells Chris that dark sprinter Jesse Owens beat his father during the rounds at the 1936 Olympics, and the meeting, various participants, note many of Chris’s characteristics, from his physical composition to his workshop, the ability to take pictures. As it turns out later, the procedure that the Armitages created involves the transplantation of a white brain into a black body and, therefore, the transfer of a wicked person’s ability to a white consciousness. Jim Hudson needs to transfer his mind to Chris’s skull, as he wants to see and photograph with Chris’s expertise.

The whole plot of the film is based on a young woman who brings a man she is dating to meet her family. This situation is familiar for the majority of people and what keeps Chris in a new state is his affection for Rose. At some point, he tells her that she is all that he has, and the couple shares many sincere minutes throughout. Rose always guarantees Chris that she can help him in any case when her family acts especially strange or does something that makes Chris feel distant. This sentimental association that builds up is what makes Rose’s possible disloyalty so terrible. The observer intends to imagine that she is an ally of Chris, but in reality, she is just as ruthless and evil as her family.

Undoubtedly, there are several precursors of the film which may have shaped Peele’s mind before he issued Get Out . Rosemary’s Baby and The Stepford Wives may have affected the plot of Peele’s movie. The main similarity of these films is that the protagonists are smart, and they are ready to investigate the situation rather than start screaming and crying. During the interview, Peele stated that he loved movies that expose the darker sides of seemingly harmless places and people” (Chan 5). Therefore, he likes The Stepford Wives, “ which reveals the underbelly of this idyllic setting” (Chan 5). All these movie’s characters have the intuition that leads them to some sinister revelation. Moreover, the audience may observe the interaction of genres, namely horror and comedy, within these films.

In conclusion, it seems reasonable to state that Get Out is a truly genius movie revealing the present concerns of tociety about racial inequality. Moreover, social insults and the small injustices of casual racism are amplified, and it turns out that they mask the most disgusting form of racism: slavery. Overall, Jordan Peele has succeeded to demonstrate such an acute problem using satirical elements, which mitigated the genre of horror.

Works Cited

Bradshaw, Peter. “Get Out Review – Fantastically Twisted Horror-Satire on Race in America”. The Guardian , 2017. Web.

Chan, Andrew. “Walking Nightmares: A Conversation with Jordan Peele.” The Criterion Collection, 2017, Web.

Harris, Brandon. “ The Giant Leap Forward of Jordan Peele’s “Get Out” .” The New Yorker , 2017.

Johnston, Trevor. “Film of the Week: Get Out, a Surreal Satire of Racial Tension.” BFI, 2018, Web.

Kermode, Mark. Get Out Review – Tea, Bingo… and Racial Terror.” The Guardian, 2017. Web.

Peele, J. (2017). Get out [Film]. Blumhouse Productions.

Cite this paper

• Chicago (N-B)
• Chicago (A-D)

StudyCorgi. (2022, January 21). “Get Out” Horror Film by Jordan Peele. https://studycorgi.com/get-out-horror-film-by-jordan-peele/

"“Get Out” Horror Film by Jordan Peele." StudyCorgi , 21 Jan. 2022, studycorgi.com/get-out-horror-film-by-jordan-peele/.

StudyCorgi . (2022) '“Get Out” Horror Film by Jordan Peele'. 21 January.

1. StudyCorgi . "“Get Out” Horror Film by Jordan Peele." January 21, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/get-out-horror-film-by-jordan-peele/.

Bibliography

StudyCorgi . "“Get Out” Horror Film by Jordan Peele." January 21, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/get-out-horror-film-by-jordan-peele/.

StudyCorgi . 2022. "“Get Out” Horror Film by Jordan Peele." January 21, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/get-out-horror-film-by-jordan-peele/.

This paper, ““Get Out” Horror Film by Jordan Peele”, was written and voluntary submitted to our free essay database by a straight-A student. Please ensure you properly reference the paper if you're using it to write your assignment.

Before publication, the StudyCorgi editorial team proofread and checked the paper to make sure it meets the highest standards in terms of grammar, punctuation, style, fact accuracy, copyright issues, and inclusive language. Last updated: October 28, 2022 .

If you are the author of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal . Please use the “ Donate your paper ” form to submit an essay.

Get Out (film)

By jordan peele, get out (film) essay questions.

How does Jordan Peele use humor in the film?

The film is certainly not a strict comedy, in that it deals with horrific and very intense themes and situations. However, there are little moments of dark satirical humor included in the film. Rod, for instance, is an exceedingly humorous character, and his lines often seem like the musings of a stand-up comedian, who can find the bright spot in any dark situation. Even when he is warning Chris to get out of the Armitage house, he gives it a comic twist. Even at the end, when there is nothing to laugh about, Rod delivers some hilarious lines to close the film.

There are other more subtle elements of humor in the film. One particular one is when Chris is killing each of the members of the Armitage family in the downstairs of the house. Just when we start to wonder where Rose went, we see her sitting on her bed listening to an 80s pop song and looking at pictures of fit, shirtless black men on her computer. This moment, of deranged calm and detachment, strikes a humorous contrast with the intensity of the violence taking place elsewhere. It also satirizes Rose's position as a "basic" white girl, depicting her as both cold-blooded and clueless.

Why does Jim Hudson buy Chris at the auction?

Jim Hudson seems like an ally at the Armitage's party, but it turns out that he just wants to buy Chris so that he can have his brain transplanted into Chris' body. Hudson is blind, for one, and wants to be able to see, but he also wants to be able to use Chris' talent as a photographer.

Who is the primary antagonist in the film?

Rose stands out as the primary antagonist in the film because of how manipulative and dishonest she is to Chris. While each member of the Armitage family is an antagonist and manipulates Chris in different ways, Rose's dishonesty is so elaborate that she ends up becoming the most evil and antagonistic character in the film. After leading Chris to believe that he can trust her and that she loves him deeply, it becomes clear that this is not the case, and that she wants him either dead or braindead.

What does the film have to say about casual racism among American liberals and seemingly progressive people?

The Armitages are undoubtedly a unique breed, horror master-villains with a near-psychopathic racist bent, but before this is revealed they represent a kind of "woke" liberal family, who believe that they are not part of the problem of racism. Before they go to visit her parents, Rose assures Chris that they will not have a problem with his race, that it will be a non-issue, and that the worst thing that will happen will be her dad being "lame" and talking about how much he loves Obama.

When they arrive, the Armitages are warm and accepting, but there are little behaviors that flag for Chris that they are fixated on his race. For instance, Dean tells Chris that he would have voted for Obama for a third term as if this is some kind of special virtue, which makes Chris feel a little awkward. He also refers to Chris as "my man" throughout the visit and makes little awkward stabs at appearing "down" with black people. Rose's brother is nice enough, but also creepily fixated on Chris' physical attributes, even challenging him to a fight. Rose's mother, Missy, get impatient with the black servant and snaps at her when she spills some tea. These are tiny events, but they represent the kinds of "microaggressions" that make Chris feel alienated, and as the plot unfolds, they belie a much more insidious and violent obsession with Chris' race, and a desire to dominate him.

Why is it important that Rod is the one who picks up Chris?

Jordan Peele originally wrote an unhappy ending, one in which the police arrive just as Chris is strangling Rose in the road. It doesn't look good for him, and the policemen don't investigate whether he is acting in self-defense or not, taking him in for questioning and believing him to be the villain. This original ending was a comment on the injustices black men face at the hands of the law. In this ending, even though Chris is trying to fight for his life, he is punished because of racial bias. Peele decided to scrap that ending, however, and make it more hopeful, by having Rod be the one to save him. This way, Chris doesn't have to face a skeptical authority, just the chiding of his best friend telling him, "I told you so." In most horror movies, the arrival of the police is a welcome thing, but in Get Out , in which a black man is the protagonist, the arrival of the police is a horrifying fate in and of itself.

Get Out (film) Questions and Answers

The Question and Answer section for Get Out (film) is a great resource to ask questions, find answers, and discuss the novel.

Where does it take place

The filming takes place in LA and Alabama but is set in Upstate New York.

what were they trying to do to chris

Missy is tricking Chris into being hypnotized. She wants him to be emotionally exposed about the death of his mother. She plunges Chris into a dark vulnerable place until she has total control of his psyche, “ Now you’re in the Sunken Place .” At...

what is a disturbing discoveries that lead chris to a truth that he never could have imagined?

Sorry, I have not seen this film yet.

Study Guide for Get Out (film)

Get Out (film) study guide contains a biography of Jordan Peele, literature essays, quiz questions, major themes, characters, and a full summary and analysis.

• About Get Out (film)
• Get Out (film) Summary
• Character List
• Director's Influence

Essays for Get Out (film)

Get Out (film) essays are academic essays for citation. These papers were written primarily by students and provide critical analysis of Get Out (film) by Jordan Peele.

• Memories That Make Us Who We Are: Comparing 'The Stepford Wives' and 'Get Out'
• Get Out: Illustration of the Enduring yet Elusive Psychology of Slavery
• To What Extent Do To Kill a Mockingbird, The Help, and Get Out Engage with White Poverty in their Depiction of White Women?
• What the Critics Got Out of 'Get Out': Commentary on Modern Racism and Its Impacts
• Bodily Autonomy and Bucks in 'Get Out'

65 Get Out (2017)

The horrors of black life in america in get out.

By Paige Mcguire

The film Get Out by Jordan Peele gives us a unique insight into the horrors of black mens life in America. His thriller, although it is somewhat dramatized shows how real and scary it is to be a man or woman of color. Throughout the film, we see multiple systemic racist issues and stereotypes. I plan on giving you an overview of the film and go into depth on a couple of scenes from the film and describe the issues they show relating to discrimination in film, as well as real life. Lastly, I will talk about Jordan Peele’s alternative ending as well as a short review of the film and how it changes the way we look at horror.

In Get Out we get a really interesting perspective into a black man named Chris’s life and his relationship with a white woman named Rose. In the beginning of the film, Chris and Rose are on their way to Rose’s parents’ house in the country for the weekend. They have a brief interruption when a deer runs out in front of them and clips their car. The police came to check out the scene and make sure everything was okay. However, they also asked Chris for his license and assumed he was suspicious due to the color of his skin. Fast forward, Chris and Rose make it to Rose’s parents’ estate. Their house is huge and comes with a pretty large amount of land.

Everyone in the family, including Chris, gather for a welcome lunch.  This is when Chris begins to initially become uncomfortable. Chris is starting to realize all of the help Rose’s family has around the house is of color. Rose’s dad does his best to explain to Chris that it is not “like that” they had just been with the family helping with the grandparents before they both passed. The next day Rose’s family hosts a huge friends and family get-together. This is probably one of the most important scenes of the whole movie, which we will get into more later. In this portion of the film everyone is coming up to introduce themselves to Chris with that however there are many subtle and not so subtle hints of racism. Chris finally sees someone at the gathering who is of color and approaches him in hopes of finding a friend. This scene turns dark when Chris notices the man seems off and isn’t acting like how a man Brookelyn would usually act. Chris snaps a picture of the man which sends him into a frenzy. The man tried to attack Chris, and screamed at him to “get out”.

After everything had calmed down with the man Chris still seemed unhappy. He and Rose go on a walk to cool down and talk while the rest of the people gather for “bingo”, or so Chris thought. Chris is able to convince Rose to leave because he isn’t comfortable. The two head back to the house to pack as everyone leaves the gathering. As Chris and Rose attempt to leave the house, things become tense. Rose can’t find the keys. This scene is where Rose reveals her true colors of actually trying to trap Chris. The family knocks Chris out using hypnosis which is previously used in the film. The entire time Rose and her family were trapping black men and women so they could brainwash them and use their bodies to live longer and healthier lives via a special brain transplant. They thought of  African-Americans as the most prime human inhabitants; they would be stronger, faster, and live longer in a black person’s body. Chris is able to fight against them and free himself. With the price of having to kill pretty much every person in his way. His friend from TSA shows up cause he knew something was fishy and was able to save him from the situation.

Now that you have gotten the basic overview of the film I want to investigate a couple of scenes from the film and explain their importance.  Starting off with the first scene where Chris is getting introduced at the gathering (43 min). This scene was where I felt as the viewer you started to see major examples of systemic racism. It seemed like every person who met Chris had something to say that could be taken offensively. In this scene they mostly used medium close-ups, showing primarily the upper half of the body. The cuts were pretty back and forth cutting from one person’s point of view in the conversation to the others. I feel like this kind of editing really adds to the scene in the fact that you can see one another’s reactions. This is important because some racist discussions occur. A couple examples are a man who said that “Black is in fashion” and a woman asked Rose in front of Chris if the sex was better. These are stereotypes that have been supported by film and other media for years and years. In fact Chapter 4 of Controversial Cinema: The films that outraged America , it brings up the fact that for many years black men and women were portrayed as more violent as well as more sexual. Equality in film is still something we’re working on today in general, and we are getting there but I think it’s important to see how much film and media have influenced us and given us a specific way that we view others. If the media is telling us to view black men as more sexual and aggressive it creates a stereotype in real life.

The second scene that I felt was really worth mentioning was when Chris and Rose go off to talk while the family plays “bingo” (59 min). The reason I say “bingo” is because they say they’re playing bingo, however when the camera begins to zoom out and pan across everyone sitting and playing you find out kind of a scary truth. In the beginning of the scene it starts off with a very tight close-up on Rose’s father, and it starts to zoom out from his face showing his gestures. Well obviously when you play bingo there is talking sometimes even yelling but no, it was dead silent. During this time Chris and Rose are off on a walk having an uncomfortable conversation. Chris feels like something is wrong, he’s not comfortable and would like to leave. The cameramen cut back and forth between these two scenes. AS the cut back to the bingo scene each time more and more of the actual scene is revealed. They are panning outward to show what they are actually doing, which is bidding on who gets to have Chris. A blind art critic ends up winning the bid, which means he will be getting to have Chris’s body to brain transfer into. There was a sort of foreshadowing earlier in the film when this man said that Chris had a great eye, this man quite literally wanted Chris’s eyes.

Now, this bidding and purchasing of people is not a new subject or idea to any of us. We should all be aware of slavery and the purchasing of African-Americans in history. That’s why I feel like it was an extra shock to see this is in this film, set in 2017. The hopes would be that stuff like slavery would not be happening anymore but I feel like Jordan Peele had a specific idea when writing this film to inform others of the struggles of African-Americans of every day and to realize that. Yes, this may be a very eccentric way of explaining it but people want the power of black people, and this is still a problem even if it’s not something on the news every day.

In fact, Jordan Peele had an alternative ending to this film that I felt like I truly needed to include. So, in the actual ending of Get Out Chris escapes the house and Rose comes after him. Chris ends up sparing her because he did love her at one point and couldn’t bring himself to do it. He sees a police car roll up, he puts up his hands and is greeted by his friend from TSA. Chris makes it out a free man. Peele revealed later that he decided to have a happier ending because at the time when the film was filmed was when Obama was still in the presidency and he had seen hope for the country. With that being said 2017 was the first year of Donald Trump’s presidency. Situations in the film like police brutality or racism via a policeman have since been more popular. So I think it’s important to include the alternate ending because Peele felt it was more realistic. So, in the alternate ending Chris makes it out of the house and Rose is coming after him. Chris instead of sparing Rose chokes her to death. A car rolls up, Chris puts his hands up and is greeted by the police. The police arrest him, and take him to jail. Now, Chris had basically been abducted, almost murdered, hypnotized, and more. Yet he was still sent to jail, this was because the house went up in flames. There had been no evidence.

In the world we live in I truly believe along with Peele that this would have been the actual outcome of the situation.  Unfortunately, our system is corrupt, and this is the type of outcome many black men and women face every day. We have seen situations like this many times this year with people like George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, Rayshard Brooks, Stephon Clark, and many many more. Awful things happen to people of color every day, and I truly believe that that was Peele’s goal to get this across to people. On Rotten Tomatoes, critic Jake Wilson made a remark saying “This brilliantly provocative first feature from comic turned writer-director Jordan Peele proves that the best way to get satire to a mass audience is to call it horror.” Honestly, I really agree with this statement. People don’t want to hear about bad stuff going on in the world especially if it doesn’t apply to them or their race. However, people go to see a thriller to see bad stuff happen, to be on their toes. This method of getting people to sit down to watch a thriller and have it show real problems is entirely the smartest thing I have ever seen.

In conclusion, the film Get Out really makes you think about the life of African-Americans from a new perspective. As a white person, I will never know truly what it’s like or the pressures that arise from being a person of color in society. All I can do is inform myself, and fight for change to be made. I think Jordan Peele is changing the way we see horror. More often than not a horror film is made up of characters and situations that realistically would never happen. Get Out shows problems from real-life situations at an extreme level but it forces people to sit down and actually, truly understand something larger than themselves.

Get Out (2017). (2017). Retrieved November 18, 2020, from https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/get_out

Phillips, K. R. (2008). Chapter 4: Race and Ethnicity: Spike Lee’s Do the Right Thing. In Controversial cinema: The films that outraged America (pp. 86-126). Westport, CT: Praeger.

Difference, Power, and Discrimination in Film and Media: Student Essays Copyright © by Students at Linn-Benton Community College is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License , except where otherwise noted.

Share This Book