A guide to your teacher's feedback: common abbreviations defined
If you are a student, you have probably seen a fair share of markings on your papers to indicate errors or ideas for improvement. If you are a teacher, you have made many of these markings and know how important it is to streamline the correcting process. While individual teachers or editors may have their own systems of signaling suggestions in writing, the language of editing and proofreading comprises many abbreviations that generally convey a universal meaning.
Below are some of the most common abbreviations used in proofreading, what they mean, and how to fix the errors they identify.
short for agreement . This refers to subject-verb agreement and means that the verb form as written does not align with the corresponding subject or pronoun. For example: Only one of the students were happy. (The correct sentence would be: Only one of the students was happy. "One "is a singular third person subject.)
Awk:
short for awkward wording . This usually refers to word order or to the way a phrase sounds. Consider breaking up the sentence to make it more concise or rendering the awkward expression in different, more straightforward language.
For example: We had bought extra food for the party that cost more than we expected and was not necessary in the end. (It is unclear whether the cost and inconvenience conveyed refers to the food or the party. A clearing wording would be: We had bought extra food for the party just in case, but the food cost more than we expected and was not necessary in the end.)
stands for capitalization , used to indicate that a word is incorrectly capitalized or that a lowercase word should be capitalized. For example:
The people in Italy speak italian .
The People in Italy speak Italian.
stands for diction . This refers to a misuse of diction, or incorrect word choice. For example: If we pass the test depends on the fact of whether or not we studied. A correct sentence would be: Whether or not we pass the test depends on how much we studied.
stands for fragment . This points out a stand-alone phrase that is not a complete sentence. For example: Regardless of how well I do on the test.
stands for pronoun antecedent agreement . This refers to a pronoun that does not agree with the subject it represents because of the person and/or number. For example: A good student always studies for their tests. ("A good student" is a third person singular subject, whereas "their" is the third person plural possessive pronoun).
short for pronoun . Not substantially different from the preceding example, this refers to any incorrect pronoun usage. For example: You and your brother are responsible for their actions. (It should be "your actions".)
means repetition when a phrase or word is redundant. For example:
Chocolate is my favorite flavor because I like it the most.
The woman appeared nervous in appearance.
RO (or R-O ):
stands for run-on sentence . A run-on sentence is a sentence that has multiple independent clauses without connecting conjunctions or commas. For example: The kids ran around the playground then they splashed each other with water. Fix this by breaking the run-on sentence into two sentences, combining the independent clauses with correct punctuation, or removing one of the subjects to create a dependent clause. For example, potential alternatives to the above sentence would be:
The kids ran around the playground. Then they splashed each other with water.
The kids ran around the playground and then splashed each other with water.
The kids ran around the playground before splashing each other with water.
The kids ran around the playground, and then they splashed each other with water.
short for spelling . This means there is a misspelled word.
Latin for Let it stand . This is a note from the proofreader to the writer to ignore a previously suggested correction, to let the text stand as it originally was written.
stands for subject verb . This is the same as Agr and means there is an error in the subject verb agreement . For example: The boys in the class is tall.
T (or VT ):
stands for verb tense . This means that a verb tense is not consistent with the context or with a surrounding verb. For example: Before the boy washed his face, he brushes his teeth.
Correct versions would be:
Before the boy washes his face, he brushes his teeth.
Before the boy washed his face, he brushed his teeth.
stands for wrong word . This indicates that there is a more appropriate or accurate word to choose to convey the writer's intended meaning.
For example: The girl had to choose from opulent opportunities for her internship.
A better word would be one of the following: The girl had to choose from numerous/many/abundant opportunities for her internship.
Another example: Their were a lot of people at the party.
Correct word: There were a lot of people at the party.
For more examples of proofreading abbreviations, symbols and examples, see the following sites:
Capital Community College Common Proofreading Symbols
Novella Abbreviations and Symbols for Editing and Proofreading
Related Content
- Information for New TAs
- Professionalism & Creating a Respectful Environment
- Teaching Evaluation & Awards
- Further Professional Development
- Getting Ready to Teach
- Classroom Management
- Facilitation Strategies
Marking & Giving Feedback
- Inclusivity
- Tips From Past BioTAP Sessions
- Assisting Students in Distress
- Canvas Support
- Useful Teaching References
- Resources for your Students
Grading guidelines
Grading is one of the main ways that students have of tracking how they are doing in their courses. It is a chance for students to obtain feedback on what they are doing well and what they need to improve.
Providing Feedback
Writing comments on the student papers that you are grading is an excellent way to communicate to your students how they can improve their work for future assignments; however, these comments must be clear, concise, and constructive. Numerous comments on papers tend to overwhelm students, and most students will act only on the simplest of suggestions. Also, writing excessive comments will make grading papers an impossibly lengthy task. Therefore, comments need to be limited, but should be specific about what needs to be improved, whether it is grammar, structure, or content. Finally, comments need to provide constructive criticism. Students may become discouraged if your comments are too negative. Make sure to mention not only what needs improvement, but also what has been done well. Avoid sarcastic comments – even if you are only joking, your students may not realize this and could be hurt by what could be interpreted as a demeaning comment.
The following is a list of abbreviations commonly used during paper review that may be useful in giving feedback to your students:
¶ = new paragraph sp. = spelling || = align vertically
The following are lists of suggested feedback phrases for commenting on student papers.
Grading Practices
Each course will have different means of assessing student progress, through assignments, quizzes, essays, exams, and other activities that will be evaluated. Instructors are responsible for providing written guidelines to all students at the start of each course. This should outline how the final grade for the course will be calculated, and include any related policies such as arrangements that may be made for students who are unable to complete a test or other graded work because of short term illness or for other reasons.
Typically each assessment contributes a portion of the course grade which is ultimately reported as a percentage achieved. In most faculties, individual course are normally graded as shown in this table:
Faculties, departments and schools reserve the right to scale grades in order to maintain equity among sections and conformity to University, faculty, department, or school norms. Grades are not official until they appear on a student’s academic record.
Academic integrity
Plagiarism, cheating, or resubmitting an assignment initially prepared for another course without permission are all serious offenses.
What is plagiarism?
Plagiarism is using another person’s ideas without giving credit and is considered intellectual theft. If you submit or present the oral or written work of someone else you are guilty of plagiarism.
Plagiarism may be…
(1) Accidental or Unintentional : The student may not even know that they are plagiarizing. Students must be made to understand the difference between quoting and paraphrasing, as well as the proper way to cite material.
(2) Blatant : Students are well aware of what they are doing. Purposefully using someone else’s ideas or work without proper acknowledgement is plagiarism. This includes turning in borrowed or bought research papers as their own.
(3) Self : Submitting the same term paper (or substantially the same term paper) for two courses without getting permission from your instructor is plagiarism.
As part of the teaching team will you be required to check for plagiarism?
YES! Instructors can detect passages that are familiar or use vocabulary beyond the expertise of students. Passages that are suspicious can easily be checked on-line through Google. In addition, UBC subscribes to TurnItIn.com, an online service that scans essay and term papers to check for material copied from websites or published from paper mills (such as cheater.com), published works, or previously submitted essays http://www.library.ubc.ca/home/plagiarism/
Resources on academic integrity:
UBC policy on plagiarism at www.vpacademic.ubc.ca/integrity
A guide to academic honesty at http://www.arts.ubc.ca/faculty-amp-staff/resources/academic-integrity.html .
A Plagiarism Resource at http://learningcommons.ubc.ca/get-study-help/academic-integrity/ .
Spam prevention powered by Akismet
- IP – S24
- Innovations – S24
- About Professor Nathenson
- Legal scholarship
- Other writings
- Scholarship on SSRN
- Scholarship on Bepress
- IP@STU: IP Certificate
- About Civil Procedure
- Assignments
- Study resources
- Nathenson.org MBE resources
- YouTube MBE playlists
- Subject matter jurisdiction
- Due Process, notice, service
- Personal jurisdiction
- Erie Doctrine
- Motions, trial, judgments
- Claim & Issue Preclusion
- Innovations & Patent Management
- Intellectual Property
- Trademark & Branding Law
- IP certificate
- - About Professor Nathenson
- - C.V.
- - Contact me
- - Legal scholarship
- - Other writings
- - Scholarship on SSRN
- - Scholarship on Bepress
- - IP@STU: IP Certificate
- - About Civil Procedure
- - Syllabus
- - Assignments
- - Study resources
- - About Professor Nathenson
- - Nathenson.org MBE resources
- - YouTube MBE playlists
- - By topic
- - Subject matter jurisdiction
- - Due Process, notice, service
- - Personal jurisdiction
- - MBE: Venue
- - Pleadings
- - Joinder
- - Erie Doctrine
- - Discovery
- - Motions, trial, judgments
- - Claim & Issue Preclusion
- - Appeals
- - Innovations & Patent Management
- - Intellectual Property
- - Trademark & Branding Law
Codes used in marking up essays
Civil procedure, professor nathenson, glossary of handwritten codes (v. 4.1).
The table below explains the meaning of common abbreviations used when scoring your essays. Don’t hesitate to ask for clarification.
| |
# | Insert space |
< | Depending on context, means “less than” or “before” as in one thing precedes another. |
= | Equals, typically in the sense that one thing is like another. In contrast, “DN =” means that “does not equal,” i.e., that one thing is like another. |
> | Means “more than.” |
¶ or ¶¶ | Either a lengthy paragraph that should be broken up, or a suggestion for a place to break for a new paragraph. Alternatively, it may mean that you should indent the first line of each new paragraph. |
A right arrow or ¬ | Indent the first line of a paragraph. |
Adv. | Depending on context, either “advertising” or “adverb.” Regarding adverbs, avoid words like “clearly” or “definitely” in your essays. If you think the answer is clear, show the reader why your answer is correct. Unfortunately, “clearly” is usually used to explain why analysis is not provided. |
AIC | Amount in Controversy |
Am. | Amendment |
Am. MOC | Amendment as a matter of course |
Amb. or Ambig. | Ambiguous |
Awk | Awkward |
B/C | Because (in other words, the statement is conclusory) |
Begs Q, Circular, or circle w/ arrows | Begging the question is when an argument assumes the correctness of a proposition, or the existence of a fact, that the writer is attempting to prove. Put differently, begging the question means assuming the thing to be proven. It might also refer to defining something in terms of itself: “Minimum contacts are satisfied when the defendant has sufficient contacts with the state to support personal jurisdiction.” |
BF or B/F | But-for, which may refer to the “but-for” test in specific jurisdiction. |
BFM | But for a mistake. |
Br. | Justice Brennan |
BSFW | Burden-shifting framework (of and ) |
BU or B/U | Break up a long sentence or paragraph. |
C&C | Clear & convincing |
C&P | Cut & Paste. This could mean that part of your essay has been copied & repeated in other parts of your essay. It could also be an observation that your rule statement is copied verbatim from the text of the rule. You do not need to state a rule more than once for a particular essay answer. |
C&S | Continuous & systematic |
C/A or Counter-arg. | Is the paper considering counterarguments? Is there an obvious counterargument that is missing? |
C/S of FS | Citizen or subject of foreign state |
C/S/EAH | Continuous, systematic, and essentially at home |
CC | Counterclaim, or if PJ is at issue, “compelling case.” In rare cases, “commerce clause.” |
CDR | Complete diversity rule |
Check mark | A check mark means nothing in terms of points. It is simply something I sometimes do while reading through a paper. |
Clearly, Generally, Adv., or Adverb | Avoid words like “clearly” or other adverbs that intensify your argument. “Clearly” is a crutch that is too-often used to boost underdeveloped arguments. With most adverbs: try removing them. If the argument works ok without the adverb, then your writing and argument will be much stronger for it. If your argument is no longer true without the adverb, then work on improving the argument. Or consider whether you need that argument at all. |
COA | Depending on context, either Court of Appeals or cause of action. |
CODS | Citizens of different states |
COL | Choice of law, or conflict of law |
Conc. or Concl. | Depending on context, either refers to argumentation that is conclusory or due to a lack of (or defect in a) conclusion. |
COQ or COTQ | Call of the question |
COS, CODS | Citizen(s) of a state, citizens of different states |
CRC | Crossclaim |
D or a Greek Delta | Defendant |
DCT or Dist. | District Court or District |
Div. or DOC | Diversity, Diversity of Citizenship |
DN | Depending on context, “do not,” “does not,” or “domain name.” |
DN = (or the “does not equal” sign) | Does not equal |
DNF | Depending on context, “did not finish” or “does not follow.” Re “does not follow,” that likely means that one of your assertions does not follow from other assertions. Your analysis may include self-contradictions or non-sequiturs. |
DP | Due Process |
EAH | Essentially at home |
EC | Extra credit |
El. or “elements” | Reference to elements. Are you providing all elements, correctly? |
EP | Equal protection, or as context demands, prediction |
EV | Evidence, such as in the evidence test in specific jurisdiction |
F by F | Break analysis up factor by factor |
F&FO | Full & fair opportunity |
FC | Facts and conclusion, i.e., rather than providing analysis, you have given the facts accompanied by a conclusion. |
FDR | Forum Defendant Rule (or possibly Franklin Delano Roosevelt) |
FF&C | Full Faith & Credit |
FL | Federal law |
FP | Fact pattern |
FQ | Federal question |
Fr. or Frag | Sentence fragment |
Frag. | Sentence fragment, not a full sentence. |
FS or F/S | Forum state |
GJ or G/J | General jurisdiction |
GR | Depending on context, gives rise or grammatical error. |
H/E | However |
History, or H/L, or news story | Legal analysis is more than just reiterating the historical facts of the case as if one were telling a story of “what happened.” Supply legal analysis, namely, the application of law to facts. |
IC | Interest and costs |
I/S | |
IFF | This is a term in logic; it means “if and only if” |
IP | Depending on context, could be: 1) personam jurisdiction; 2) intellectual property; 3) internet protocol address |
IR/QIR | In rem/quasi-in rem |
IRAC and similar abbreviations such as IRC, IC, IRFC, etc. | Obviously IRAC means Issue-Rule-Analysis-Conclusion. If I write down IRC or IC, I likely mean that you are providing incomplete discussion. IRC would be Issue-Rule-Conclusion . IC would be a jump from Issue to conclusion without rule or analysis. If I say something like IRFC, then you are supplying facts rather than analysis, i.e., Issue-Rule-Facts-Conclusion. Giving facts is simply telling a story; it’s not analysis. |
J.D. | Judicial district |
JJ | Judgment |
K, M, or S | Depending on context, K is “contract” or “Kirk.” M refers to McCoy. Depending on context, S refers to Spock or Scotty. |
LA or L/A | Long-arm (statute) |
LC | Law and conclusion, but lacking analysis, or depending on context, “legal certainty” |
LL | Laundry list |
LPR | Lawful permanent resident |
Maj. | Majority |
Make arg. or M/A | To state that an argument or or made is not the same thing as the argument and analyzing it. If an argument is sufficiently important that you think something be argued |
MC or M/C | Minimum contacts (test) |
MD or M/D | Minimal diversity |
MOC | Matter of course |
MTD | Motion to dismiss |
MTR | Motion to remand |
N but NS, or N but IS, and variants | Necessary but not sufficient, necessary but insufficient. What essay states is necessary but by itself insufficient to support conclusion. |
N/S or Non-Seq | Non sequiter, Latin, means one thing does not follow from another. In other words, an error in logic. |
NAP | No answer provided |
NBI | Necessary but insufficient |
Nec. | Necessary |
NIF or not in facts | Not in facts (not in the fact pattern); essay makes a factual assertion that is neither contained in nor justified by the fact pattern. |
NIS | Negative-issue spotting: it squanders valuable time on non-issues. |
NOR | Notice of removal |
Not PP | The argument is presented by the student as a public policy argument, but is not really public policy. Reasons may include stating or restating legal argumentation (such as describing rule) as a policy. Examples might include “The policy behind PJ is to prevent courts from permitting jurisdiction over a person lacking sufficient contacts with a state.” That’s nothing more than a vague reference to the , i.e., the minimum contacts test. |
O’C or OC, or O/C | Justice O’Connor, or depending on context, overall conclusion provided? |
OI or O/I | Overall issue provided? |
One or more question marks (?) | Means that there is a problem, such as: 1) an argument does not make sense; 2) I do not understand what the paper is trying to say; or 3) an argument is not coherent. |
OR, O/R, or OAR | Overall rule provided? |
Org. | Organization |
OW or O/W | Otherwise |
P or a Greek Pi | Plaintiff |
PA or P/A | Purposeful availment |
PJ | Personal jurisdiction |
POPL | Principles of Public Law (from ) |
PP | Public policy |
PPOB | Principal place of business |
PvN | |
QP | Question presented (i.e., the issue presented) |
R&A | Regular & anticipated (as in Brennan’s SOC standard) |
R&AF | Regular & anticipated flow (of goods into the forum state through the stream of commerce) |
R/B or RB | Relation back |
R/O or run-on | Run-on sentence. |
RA | Rule analysis, i.e., your application of the law to facts. |
RD | Rule definition (the statement of law) is missing or flawed. |
RDA | Rules of Decision Act |
REA | Rules Enabling Act |
Rel. | Relevant or relevance. |
Req. or Req’d | Requires or required |
RF | Reasonableness factors |
RO or R/O | Run-on sentence. |
RP | Real property |
RQ or RQ DN = analysis | Paper is asking a rhetorical question rather than providing analysis of the issue. Your job as a scholar is to ask questions to answer them. If the question is worth asking, then it is also worth trying to answer. |
SC | Depending on context, either subconclusion needed, or a reference to the Supreme Court. |
SC | Means sub-conclusion. Either an indication that I saw that you provided one, or a reminder that you did not provide one. |
Scalia | Would you make this argument to Justice Scalia? (See also SF/Straight-face) |
SCT | Supreme Court |
Self-contr. | Discussion appears to contradict itself. |
SF | Does this argument pass the “straight-face test?” |
SL or S/L | State law |
SJ or S/J | Specific jurisdiction |
SMJ | Subject-matter jurisdiction |
SOC | Stream of commerce |
SP | Spelling error. |
SPM | |
SSI/SSP | States’ shared interest in substantive social policy |
SSP | Substantive social policy |
St. | Depending on context, State or Justice Stevens |
Story | Don’t tell a story. In other words, don’t repeat the facts. Provide analysis. |
Straw man, SMA, or False Dichotomy | A straw man argument is a counter-position that is set up so that it can be refuted. Either further develop the counter-position as a plausible position even if you still reject it, or considering removing it entirely. The danger of straw man arguments is that they may be used as part of a “false dichotomy” fallacy, which sets up two arguments as the positions available. By striking down the obviously “wrong” position (the straw man), the author sets up the proffered alternative as the “correct” position. However, straw man arguments, when combined with false dichotomies, typically ignore the possibility that other positions may be plausible and even preferable than the two discussed. |
The “does not equal” sign | Means “does not equal” or “is not the same as.” |
The congruence sign (a squiggle or similar signs) | This is the congruence sign in mathematics. I use it to mean “analogous.” |
TNOFP | Traditional notions of fair play (and substantial justice) |
TOC | Totality of circumstances |
TP | Transient presence |
TPC | Third party claim |
U/E or UE | Unguided |
Ven. | Venue |
Typing or Typing DN = RD | Merely copying or typing the rule verbatim or near-verbatim from the rule supplement is providing a meaningful rule statement. You don’t get points merely for showing that you can see and type. |
Vol. | Voluntary, voluntariness. Might be volume in context of Stevens’ stream of commerce test |
VVH | Volume, value, hazardousness (Stevens’ stream of commerce test) |
W/, w/in, w/o | With, within, without |
W/? or W/__ | With what? |
WN | Would not |
Updated Mar. 21, 2018 (v4.1)
Professional English proofreading and editing services
Trusted by thousands of esl speakers, students and international businesses..
Subject-matter experts
Experienced US and UK editors in your academic field.
A reputation for quality
Read our independently verified reviews on TrustPilot .
Secure and confidential
Secure, reliable and confidential service.
How To Use Abbreviations in Academic Writing
November 3, 2022 | Blog
Cheat sheet
No time to read? Here’s the short version:
- Avoid contractions like won’t, can’t, they’re, it’s .
- The first time you mention a phrase that can be abbreviated, spell it out in full and provide the abbreviation in parentheses. Use only the abbreviation thereafter.
- Only abbreviate phrases that occur three or more times in your paper.
- Avoid abbreviations in titles, headings, the abstract, and the reference section.
- Use the standard abbreviations you find in reputable dictionaries for months, personal titles, countries and states, and some Latin phrases.
What’s an abbreviation?
Abbreviation is an umbrella term for a shortened version of a longer word or phrase. There are four types of abbreviations:
- Contraction: The result of combining two words into one word with an apostrophe. For example, don’t is a contraction of do not.
- Shortening: Shortened words in which a part of the word (usually the beginning or the end, but occasionally both!) has been dropped. They may appear as words in their own right, such as app for application, ad for advertisement, and flu for influenza. They may also appear as truncated words which are read out as if they were full words, such as for professor, Mgmt. for management, and Feb . for February. In such cases, the truncation is usually signalled with a full stop.
- Acronym: A series of letters that represents a longer phrase. The end result is pronounced like a word. For example, NASA is the acronym for the US National Aeronautics and Space Administration and is pronounced nah-sa .
- Initialism: Like an acronym, an initialism consists of several letters and represents a longer phrase. However, the end result cannot be pronounced as a word and instead has to be read letter by letter. FBI is the initialism for the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and each letter is pronounced individually: ef-bee-eye.
Contractions are considered informal. They are therefore best avoided in academic writing, where it’s essential to maintain a formal register.
When to use abbreviations
Only use abbreviations for phrases that you use three or more times in a paper. For terms you use less frequently, it’s easier for a reader to read the full phrase than to try to remember an abbreviation encountered only once several pages earlier.
Sometimes, you may introduce an abbreviation at the beginning of your paper, but may not use it again until much later. In that case, consider adding a List of Abbreviations to help the reader follow along.
How to introduce an abbreviation
When you first use a phrase that can be abbreviated, spell it out in full and show the abbreviation in parentheses immediately afterwards.
Organizations often use a request for proposal (RFP) to solicit work.
The study was conducted at the University of Lagos (UNILAG). Many UNILAG students were surveyed for this research.
If the long-form phrase is already in parentheses the first time it occurs, use square brackets to set the abbreviation apart.
The number of imprisoned journalists globally has risen in the past 10 years (Society of Professional Journalists [SPJ], 2015).
Remember, after you’ve introduced the abbreviation, use only the acronym throughout the rest of your paper. You don’t need to spell out the full phrase again. That’s the beauty of abbreviations!
The World Health Organization (WHO) recently conducted a joint study with the South African Medical Association (SAMA) on water hygiene in South Africa. WHO provided SAMA with a five-year grant to collect data from 25 hospitals.
How to pluralize abbreviations
To make an acronym or initialism plural, all you need to do is add a lowercase s to the end; no apostrophes necessary!
Correct: The CEOs were profiled in Forbes magazine.
Incorrect: The CEO’s were profiled in Forbes magazine.
Incorrect: The CEOS were profiled in Forbes magazine.
Articles before abbreviations
When to use a or an before an abbreviation.
Use the article that matches the way the abbreviation is pronounced. If the first sound is a vowel sound, use an . If the abbreviation starts with a consonant sound, use a .
an NBC reporter
an MRI machine
a NATO representative
a MOMA exhibit
Still not sure which article to use? Deciding whether to use a or an can be tricky. In a pinch, try searching for the entire phrase online (enclosed in quotation marks) to see how other writers in your industry have approached the problem.
When to use the before an abbreviation
This rule depends on whether the abbreviation is an acronym or an initialism. Add the if the abbreviation is an initialism (not an acronym) for a phrase or name that normally includes the word the (but don’t add the letter T in the abbreviation).
Correct: the International Criminal Court → the ICC
Correct: the Women’s National Basketball Association → the WNBA
Incorrect: the National Aeronautics and Space Administration → the NASA
When to avoid abbreviations
Avoid using abbreviations in the following sections of an academic paper:
Section headings
Reference section.
Your title should be accessible to all readers and easy to understand. Avoid ambiguity by spelling out phrases in full.
Correct: The Environmental Protection Agency’s Stance on Carbon Capture
Incorrect: The EPA’s Stance on Carbon Capture
Abstracts are short. It’s unlikely that you’ll use the same term three or more times in an abstract, so abbreviations are not necessary here. However, if you do introduce an abbreviation in the abstract, remember to do it in the body of your paper as well.
Some readers will skim your paper to identify those sections that are most useful to them. Help them navigate the contents more easily by using full phrases in the section headings instead of relying on abbreviations.
Correct: Undergraduate Enrolment in the Society of Women Engineers in 2018
Incorrect: Undergraduate Enrolment in the SWE in 2018
You can use abbreviations in in-text citations. In the Reference section (sometimes labelled Works Cited), however, all abbreviations should be written in full.
Correct: American Psychological Association. (2010). Gen Y’s evolving gender roles. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/millennials/gender.
Incorrect: American Psychological Association (APA). (2010). Gen Y’s evolving gender roles. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/millennials/gender.
Incorrect: APA. (2010). Gen Y’s evolving gender roles. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/millennials/gender.
Abbreviations in other languages
Sometimes, an abbreviation or acronym might be in a foreign language. In this case, introduce both the full phrase or name of the organization in its original language and the English translation. The abbreviation should reflect the correct word order in the original language.
Italy’s Five Star Movement, known as Movimento Cinque Stelle (M5S), is a populist, anti-establishment reform party.
You can also introduce the abbreviation by putting the original name in parentheses and the abbreviation in brackets within the parentheses.
In parliamentary elections held in March 2018, the Five Star Movement (Movimento Cinque Stelle [M5S]) emerged as the largest party in Italy with 32% of the vote.
When to add a list of abbreviations
If you’ve used 10 or more abbreviations in your thesis or dissertation, consider adding a formal list of abbreviations after the table of contents. This will help your reader follow along more easily. Even if you do include a list of abbreviations, be sure to introduce each abbreviated phrase in full the first time that you use it within your text, with the corresponding abbreviation in parentheses.
A list of abbreviations should contain all the abbreviations your paper uses in alphabetical order. Abbreviations starting with a number should come before the letter ‘A’. Here’s a shortened example from a paper on medicine:
BNA | British Nursing Association |
BP | blood pressure |
DSM-5 | Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition |
PE | pulmonary embolism |
As shown in the example, abbreviations can represent not only names that would be capitalized in their full form, but also common terms that are not normally capitalized, such as blood pressure (BP). If such terms recur often in the running text, it makes sense to abbreviate them, too.
Some acronyms and initialisms are so common that they require no formal introduction; there is no need to define these in either the running text or the List of Abbreviations. Examples include USSR, AIDS, HTML, and GMT.
Frequent errors
Using abbreviations correctly in English is quite tricky, and many writers struggle with this aspect of their academic writing. Here’s a very common mistake: following an abbreviation with a word that is already in the abbreviation. For example, if you say ATM machine , the word machine is redundant because the last letter of the acronym already stands for machine .
Need more help?
If you need a professional editor’s help with your work, submit your paper for proofreading today. Get an instant quote on our pricing page .
Hire us to improve your document
Ordering our professional editing and proofreading service is quick and easy, and we guarantee the quality of our work.
View Prices
Our clients
Our professional editing and proofreading services are trusted by household names in business and education.
- CAW's Student Portal
- CAW's Staff Portal
- Research Support
CAW LibGuides: Glossary of Written Assignment Feedback Terms
- CAW Homepage
- Meet the Team
- Using CAW's Workshop Support
- Academic Writing Tutorial Policy
- Making the most of your academic writing tutorial
- Using CAW's Single Question Drop-in Support
- Academic Writing Workshops
- Academic Writing Tutorials
- Single Question Drop-in Sessions
- Referencing Support
- Exam Writing Support
- CAW's Add+Vantage Modules
- The Short Guide to Assessment
- The Writing Process
- How to Analyse an Assignment Brief
- Paragraph Structure
- Understanding and Avoiding Plagiarism
- Tips for Polishing and Proofreading
- Self or Peer Assessing an Essay
- Understanding Written Assignment Feedback
- Structuring an Academic Essay
- Writing a Literature Review
- Writing a Report
- Reflective Writing
- Writing a Dissertation Proposal
- Essay Writing in Exams
- Definitions of Directive Words
- Style and Register
- Punctuation for Academic Writing
- Integrating Sources using Signal Phrases
Glossary of Written Assignment Feedback Terms
- Glossary Terms for Types of Academic Misconduct
- Writing for Presentations, Infographics, and Posters
- Finishing a Thesis - Checklist of Thesis Features
- Finishing a Thesis - Suggested To-Do List
- Developing Writing for Research and Publication Purposes
- Other Support Services
In Carless & Boud (2018), feedback is defined as a process in which learners make sense of comments and use them for enhancement purposes.
There are many types of feedback that can are transferrable to various types of written assignments. The main ones are:
- Formal – your mark, and comments on summative assignments.
- Informal – written or spoken feedback on draft work.
- Peer – from other students.
- Work related – part of performance reviews/placements/work experience.
- Advice – from friends, family, or employers.
- Data – numbers and statistics.
- Self-reflection – either related to assignments or personal!
Being too vague about a point by not explaining it in specific language, or by failing to ground it in theory or to use other examples (see also ‘Concrete’).
Address the question
Make sure that you are answering the question that is being asked – students sometimes write about topics that miss the point. Make sure your arguments and material are relevant and clearly linked to the question, and you are not simply writing everything you know about the topic.
Assess the limitations of the study
Weigh up aspects of the study and consider weaknesses that might undermine the validity of the study, and/or suggest ways the research could be improved. The weaknesses could be methodological, but may also be with how the author’s interpret and present their own findings.
Balanced argument
While it is often valuable to take a stance, be sure to present evidence for the other sides of the argument.
Make sure that the reader can easily understand what points you have made by writing clearly, and explaining why you have made these points. Sometimes it’s just a case of writing straightforwardly, and not assuming the reader will automatically know what you were thinking.
In your work you need to explain ideas clearly but with fewer words – if you have a word limit, make effective use of it! The marker may think you are waffling. Be succinct and avoid needlessly complicated words and phrases.
Make sure that you’re using clear and specific language to talk about a defined situation or a certain finding, not just vague ideas (see also ‘Abstract’).
Critically Evaluate/ Critically Analyse
Show that you have actively thought about and questioned the claims you are describing or making. Even if the claims are completely valid, show that you haven’t just accepted them at face value.
Depth/ Elaborate
Make sure that you explain your arguments in detail, using examples where appropriate and working through your ideas rather than simply glossing over them.
Showing a sophisticated or elegant writing style, or presenting evidence in an original or insightful way.
Creating a coherent argument by connecting points in a logical order to ensure that the work is easy to follow.
Give examples to back up the points you make, ideally using evidence.
Originality
Demonstrating your own thinking, perhaps by drawing upon research beyond what you learned about in class, to make an argument that not every student might have thought of.
Reading work back carefully, or getting another person to read it, to check for spelling and grammar mistakes. You should also check that your arguments make sense, and that everything is phrased clearly.
Range of Material
Try and use more than just the material provided by the lecturers, and avoid basing too much of your work on just one or two references.
Give a more precise and detailed account of what is being described, drawing on particular examples.
A way of presenting your work so the reader can follow the argument. Make sure your paragraphs are in a logical order, that you show the connections between different paragraphs, and that each section has good beginning and ending sentences.
Synthesis/ Integration
Show how different sources and theories go together to make a good argument. A lack of synthesis could mean your essay reads more like a list of research than an argument.
Transparent
Making sure that the thought-process that underlies your argument is clearly expressed. Even if you have a good idea, it’s not always easy for your marker to see your train of thought.
Unsubstantiated Claims
An unsubstantial claim lacks evidence. Make sure you justify your argument by supporting each point with empirical evidence and references. This will create a more persuasive argument.
Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1315-1325.
Further Support
CAW offers writing development workshops across all genres of academic writing, including ' Using Written Assignment Feedback to Develop your Writing ' that can provide additional support and guidance during your writing process. To view available workshops and book online, visit: https://libcal.coventry.ac.uk/calendar/caw
- Glossary of Written Assignment Feedback Terms Download pdf document of 'Glossary of Written Assignment Feedback Terms'
- << Previous: Integrating Sources using Signal Phrases
- Next: Glossary Terms for Types of Academic Misconduct >>
- Last Updated: Jun 7, 2024 9:17 AM
- URL: https://libguides.coventry.ac.uk/CAWhomepage
Lanchester Library Telephone: +44 (0) 24 7765 7575 |
---|
- Link to facebook
- Link to linkedin
- Link to twitter
- Link to youtube
- Writing Tips
How to Use Acronyms in Academic Writing
- 5-minute read
- 24th February 2015
In academic writing, you may need to use acronyms and initialisms. However, these are easy to misuse, especially when introducing them in an essay. So, how exactly do you use acronyms and initialisms in academic writing? And how to do you avoid using them incorrectly ? Let’s take a look.
What Is an Acronym?
Acronyms and initialisms are abbreviations formed from the first letters of the words in a phrase or an organisation’s name:
- Acronyms are pronounced as one word (e.g. UNICEF).
- Each letter in an initialism is pronounced separately (e.g. BBC).
We use these abbreviations instead of the full terminology to save space or avoid repetition. For example, ‘UNESCO’ is much shorter than ‘United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization’.
People sometimes think there is no need to introduce a well-known acronym or initialism. However, since many have more than one meaning, this can be confusing (as the World Wildlife Fund and the World Wrestling Federation ably demonstrated for many years).
Likewise, even if you are familiar with an acronym, other people might not be, especially if it is specific to your topic. As such, you should make the effort to define acronyms clearly when you introduce them in an essay.
How to Introduce Acronyms and Initialisms
When writing an essay, you should assume that your audience will not understand the abbreviations you use unless you have been told otherwise.
The first time you use one, write out the full terminology with the acronym/initialism in parentheses afterwards, like so:
The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) was first established…
You can then continue to refer to it as ‘UNESCO’ throughout your essay.
The one exception here is when the acronym/initialism is more common than the actual name. Most people know the package delivery company United Parcel Service, for example, as UPS.
In cases like this, you can sometimes give the shortened version first and full terminology in parentheses:
The delivery company UPS (United Parcel Service) is known for…
After introducing the term like this, you can use the shortened version throughout the rest of your essay.
Capitalising Acronyms and Initialisms
Initialisms (i.e. abbreviations that are pronounced letter by letter) are almost always written in all caps (e.g. BBC, FBI, WWF). There are some exceptions to this, such as when ‘Transport for London’ is abbreviated to ‘TfL’. In most cases, though, you will need to capitalise each letter in an initialism.
This varies a bit more for acronyms (i.e. abbreviations pronounced as a single word). Some British English style guides recommend only capitalising the first letter of these terms (e.g. Unesco or Unicef). If you are using a style guide, it is thus worth checking it for advice on how to write acronyms. Otherwise, this is simply a matter of preference (just make sure to use a consistent capitalisation style throughout your writing).
In addition, there are a few common words that began as acronyms . These include ‘radar’ (short for ‘ radio detection and ranging ‘) and ‘laser’ (short for ‘ light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation’ ). However, most people don’t even realise that these words were originally abbreviations, and they are always written with lowercase letters.
Find this useful?
Subscribe to our newsletter and get writing tips from our editors straight to your inbox.
Make Sure to Check the First Instance of the Acronym!
Many people edit and re-structure their essays at the last minute. In doing so, they may accidentally use an acronym somewhere before they defined it in the first draft, making it harder to understand.
To prevent this, though, you can use the ‘find’ function in MS Word:
- Open the search bar in MS Word (e.g. hit Ctrl + F in Word for Windows).
- Type the initialism you want to check into the search bar.
- Find the first use in the document.
If the first use of each abbreviation comes with the full terminology, all is well. If not, find the place you defined it and move the full terminology.
Creating a List of Abbreviations
If your work contains a large number of acronyms, you may want to create a list of abbreviations. Typically, this is a list at the start of a document that defines all the initialisms, acronyms, and other abbreviations.
The reader can then check this list if they need to know the meaning of an abbreviation. This can be especially useful in longer documents, as it saves the reader having to find where the abbreviation is first used and defined.
Punctuating Abbreviations
Most acronyms and abbreviations are written without punctuation, as shown in the examples above. However, it is common to use full stops in lowercase abbreviations, such as ‘a.m.’, ‘p.m.’, ‘e.g.’, and ‘i.e.’ And some style guides (mostly those that focus on American English) recommend using a full stop between letters in short initialisms, such as ‘U.S.A.’ and ‘U.K.’
Unless you’re using a style guide that suggests adding periods to certain abbreviations, this is usually a matter of preference. But make sure to apply a consistent style! For example, either of the following would be acceptable:
He was born in the UK, but he lives in the USA now. ✔
He was born in the U.K., but he lives in the U.S.A. now. ✔
But mixing these punctuation styles would be incorrect:
He was born in the UK, but he lives in the U.S.A. now. ✘
Make sure to think about how to punctuate abbreviations in your own writing.
Expert Proofreading Services
The rules for using acronyms can vary slightly. As such, if you are using a style guide, you should check what it says about abbreviations and acronyms.
Whichever style you’re using, though, our expert editors can help! Make sure your writing is always error free by getting it checked with Proofed. Upload a free trial document today to find out more.
Share this article:
Post A New Comment
Get help from a language expert. Try our proofreading services for free.
9-minute read
How to Use Infographics to Boost Your Presentation
Is your content getting noticed? Capturing and maintaining an audience’s attention is a challenge when...
8-minute read
Why Interactive PDFs Are Better for Engagement
Are you looking to enhance engagement and captivate your audience through your professional documents? Interactive...
7-minute read
Seven Key Strategies for Voice Search Optimization
Voice search optimization is rapidly shaping the digital landscape, requiring content professionals to adapt their...
How to Ace Slack Messaging for Contractors and Freelancers
Effective professional communication is an important skill for contractors and freelancers navigating remote work environments....
3-minute read
How to Insert a Text Box in a Google Doc
Google Docs is a powerful collaborative tool, and mastering its features can significantly enhance your...
2-minute read
How to Cite the CDC in APA
If you’re writing about health issues, you might need to reference the Centers for Disease...
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Use this guide to the common abbreviations that you may find on the margins of your paper to decode your instructor's feedback!
Essay Feedback Abbreviations. • TNA = Task Not Addressed. This is a comment that applies to the body paragraph as a whole. It means that the required task for that paragraph, as outlined in the bullet points, was either partially or completely left unaddressed.
CORRECTION SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS USED IN MARKING ESSAYS. ab. Abbreviation inappropriate or incorrect. ack. Acknowledgement missing or faulty (You did not give credit to a source you borrowed ideas or words from) adj. Adjective missing or faulty. adj: He is feeling badly today.
The following is a list of abbreviations commonly used during paper review that may be useful in giving feedback to your students: ¶ = new paragraph. sp. = spelling. || = align vertically. The following are lists of suggested feedback phrases for commenting on student papers.
Writing Feedback Glossary. A glossary of academic writing terms to help you understand your feedback. Term. Explanation. Example. abbreviation. shortened form of a word or phrase. uni; lab.
The table below explains the meaning of common abbreviations used when scoring your essays. Don’t hesitate to ask for clarification.
Only abbreviate phrases that occur three or more times in your paper. Avoid abbreviations in titles, headings, the abstract, and the reference section. Use the standard abbreviations you find in reputable dictionaries for months, personal titles, countries and states, and some Latin phrases.
There are many types of feedback that can are transferrable to various types of written assignments. The main ones are: Formal – your mark, and comments on summative assignments. Informal – written or spoken feedback on draft work. Peer – from other students.
How to Introduce Acronyms and Initialisms. When writing an essay, you should assume that your audience will not understand the abbreviations you use unless you have been told otherwise. The first time you use one, write out the full terminology with the acronym/initialism in parentheses afterwards, like so: