mental work/day
The number of mental work hours/day was associated with poorer sleep quality, although the association was only statistically significant when sleep quality was considered dichotomously (PSQI score>5). As can be seen in Table 3 , students in the 4 th quartile of mental work hours/day had a 28% higher adjusted probability of poor quality sleep compared to those in the 1 st quartile (95% CI 2% to 62%; P for trend=0.03). This association may be mostly attributed to the sleep duration component; e.g. those in the 4 th quartile of mental work hours/day were 1.74 times more likely to obtain <6 hours of sleep (95% CI 1.10 to 2.75; P for trend=0.09).
Associations between mental intensity and sleep quality among 656 participants recruited from a US university
N | Sleep Quality Score Unadjusted beta (95% CI) | Sleep Quality Score Adjusted beta (95% CI) | Sleep Quality Score>5 Adjusted Prevalence Ratio (95% CI) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hours spent in mental work on school days | ||||
Q1 (1 to 4 hrs per day) | 210 | Reference | Reference | Reference |
Q2 (4.5 to 5.5 hrs per day) | 193 | 0.27 (−0.27, 0.82) | 0.18 (−0.36, 0.72) | 1.17 (0.94, 1.45) |
Q3 (6 to 8 hrs per day) | 164 | 0.32 (−0.24, 0.89) | 0.13 (−0.45, 0.70) | 1.22 (0.98, 1.53) |
Q4 (9 to 15 hrs per day) | 132 | 0.51 (−0.10, 1.12) | 0.38 (−0.24, 0.99) | 1.28 (1.02, 1.62) |
P, trend | 0.10 | 0.29 | 0.03 | |
Mental intensity on school days | ||||
Q1 (8 to 60) | 182 | Reference | Reference | Reference |
Q2 (63 to 96) | 180 | 0.49 (−0.08, 1.06) | 0.43 (−0.15, 1.00) | 1.23 (0.97, 1.57) |
Q3 (100 to 140) | 194 | 0.48 (−0.08, 1.03) | 0.33 (−0.24, 0.90) | 1.29 (1.02, 1.62) |
Q4 (144 to 420) | 143 | 0.87 (0.27, 1.48) | 0.72 (0.11, 1.34) | 1.45 (1.15, 1.83) |
P, trend | 0.008 | 0.04 | 0.002 |
In contrast to mental work hours/day, mental intensity score was robustly associated with worse quality sleep ( Table 3 ). Students in the 4 th quartile of mental intensity had 0.72 higher PSQI scores than students in the 1 st quartile (95% CI 0.11 to 1.34; P for trend= 0.04), and a 45% higher probability of being classified as a poor quality sleeper (95% 15% to 83%; P for trend=0.002). Further, there was evidence of interaction by sex (P, interaction=0.05), such that the mental intensity-sleep quality association was stronger among females. For example, females in the 4 th quartile of mental intensity had a 70% higher adjusted probability of poor quality sleep than females in the 1 st quartile (95% CI 9% to 163%).
The association between mental intensity and sleep quality were further investigated by examining the individual sleep quality component scores ( Figure 1 ). Of the 7 components, only the association between mental intensity and short sleep duration was statistically significantly related (112% higher probability of short sleep in the 4 th compared to the 1 st quartile; P for trend= 0.01). Consequently, there was evidence of interaction by sex with 2 of the components-sleep quality (P, interaction=0.006) and use of sleeping medication (P, interaction=0.04). Among males, higher mental intensity was associated with poor sleep quality and greater likelihood of using a sleeping medication. In direct contrast, females with higher mental intensity were less likely to use a sleeping medication and trended towards reporting higher quality sleep. However, females with higher mental intensity had shorter sleep duration ( Figure 1 ) and lower sleep efficiency (PR of <85% sleep efficiency=1.99 with 95% CI 0.92 to 4.30 comparing the 4 th quartile to the 1 st ).
Mental intensity in relation to selected components of the PSQI, sex-stratified
1 Q1 represents the lowest mental intensity in each. Sample sizes in each of the quartiles are as follows for Males: Q1=131, Q2= 105, Q3= 102, Q4= 74; and Females: Q1= 43; Q2= 62; Q3= 81; Q4= 58
In this sample of participants recruited from a small US college campus and surrounding town, we found that higher mental intensity was associated with poor sleep quality, an association that appeared to be only partially driven by actual quantity of work (number of study hours). Interestingly, whereas higher mental intensity was associated with short sleep duration in both males and females, associations with other sleep quality components differed by sex. While males with higher mental intensity reported lower quality sleep and higher usage of sleep medication, females with higher mental intensity had better sleep quality and were less likely to use sleep medication.
These findings add to the sparse data concerning mental workload and sleep quality in university students, and are in line with a few others from Nigeria and Lithuania ( Oluwole, 2010 ; Preišegolavičiūtė et al., 2010 ) that have found associations between higher academic workloads and lower quality sleep. One obvious explanation for an association between mental workload and poor sleep quality is that students who spend more time studying devote less time to sleep. This assertion is consistent with our finding that a higher number of reported study hours was associated with lower quality sleep, most notably with the sleep duration component of overall sleep quality. Another explanation for an association between higher number of hours spent studying and lower sleep quality is that a longer amount of time spent studying is typically concomitant with sedentary behavior and high amounts of screen time, which have each been associated with lower quality sleep ( Exelmans & Van Den Bulck, 2017 ; Pilcher, Morris, Bryant, Merritt, & Feigl, 2017 ; Wu, Tao, Zhang, Zhang, & Tao, 2015 ). In particular, studying performed at night on light emitting devices can increase nighttime alertness ( Chang, Aeschbach, Duffy, & Czeisler, 2015 ).
Although there was an association between number of typical study hours and poor sleep quality, there was a stronger association between poor sleep quality and perceived mental intensity, a measure that incorporates both the number of study hours and perceived cognitive stimulation of the study time. While we could identify no studies within university populations that have examined this construct, our findings are in line with studies of adults in the workplace which have found that cognitively and emotionally demanding work is associated with sleep disturbances( T. Åkerstedt et al., 2002 ; Torbjörn Åkerstedt et al., 2015 ; Marquié, Foret, & Quéinnec, 1999 ). To highlight, a study of Swiss workers found that high work demand on one day, which was measured by “working very intensively”, “demanding too much effort”, and “not enough time to do everything”, was associated with more sleep disturbances that night( Torbjörn Åkerstedt et al., 2015 ).
There may be a few plausible explanations for association between mental intensity and poor sleep quality in our sample. First, after intense studying, particularly if done mostly at night, student may find it hard to transition into a relaxed state for sleep ( Wuyts et al., 2012 ). Second, higher perceived mental intensity could be positively associated with academic-related stress, and stress is known to affect sleep quality in college students ( Almojali, Almalki, Alothman, Masuadi, & Alaqeel, 2017 ). However, although no measures of stress were obtained in this study, it is of note that the POMS anxiety score was associated with sleep quality but not with perceived mental intensity.
We also found evidence that males and females respond differently to perceived mental intensity with respect to sleep quality characteristics. In particular, females with high mental intensity may have difficulties with falling and staying asleep (insomnia symptoms), as evidenced by the tendency towards lower sleep efficiency in our study. This is not necessarily surprising, as females are more likely to suffer from insomnia than men ( Petrov, Lichstein, & Baldwin, 2014 ). Interestingly, women with higher mental intensity were also less likely to use sleep medications and to report high-quality sleep, which are paradoxically markers of better sleep health but not necessarily contradictory (e.g. it is possible to take a long time to fall asleep yet still experience high sleep quality once asleep). In contrast, males with high mental intensity had higher consumption of caffeinated beverages and were more likely to use sleep medication. In turn, these substances may be responsible for the lower ratings of subjective sleep quality ( Ogeil & Phillips, 2015 ). A sleep medication may be a simple over the counter medication, however, it may also include other substances such as alcohol and marijuana ( Hasler et al., 2017 ; Taylor & Bramoweth, 2010 ). For example, in a study among undergraduates from the US, 11% of non-abstainers reported using alcohol as a sleep aid in the past week ( Taylor & Bramoweth, 2010 ).
There are both strengths and limitations in the present study. A strength was the relatively large sample size, as well as the inclusion of the mental intensity score, a construct that has not been previously considered in relation to sleep. The cross-sectional study design was a limitation, as it results in temporal ambiguity. Further, the questions pertaining to mental workload did not include a time reference, while the PSQI asked about sleep in the previous month. In addition, although the target population was university students, it is possible that adults residing in the surrounding town who were not university attendees took part in the study. Nonetheless, only 7.7% of our study sample were older than 25 years, indicating that the majority of the sample were in a typical age range for undergraduate college students. While this does not guarantee these participants were enrolled in a university, the likelihood is high given that [name redacted] is a small town of approximately 16,000 people that houses two universities. Further, it is possible that the >25 year old participants could be graduate students, as both universities also offer graduate programs. A related issue was that it was not possible to differentiate students by field of study (e.g. engineering versus other), which precludes examination of effect modification by academic major. Sleep quality was self-reported and thus may be subject to measurement error; nonetheless, this error may be non-differential with respect to the exposure and may only affect the precision of the estimates. There is also the possibility of unmeasured confounding. For example, participants were not asked about alcohol consumption, average daily screen time, or number of credit hours. Finally, they were not asked about the timing of study habits, so it was not possible to examine whether night-time studying had an impact on sleep quality or whether results differed if the study hours were typically continuous or intermittent. Future studies among college students that investigate the role of night-time studying habits versus those during the day are thus warranted.
In summary, we found that perceived mental intensity, a summary marker that includes both mental work hours as well as self-rated intensity, was associated with poor sleep quality among university students. This association was attributed to different sleep characteristics in males compared to females. Overall this study provides another perspective on why university students may benefit from information on sleep hygiene and health. Based on our findings, these messages might need to be tailored differently for university males and females.
Funding Details : Dr. Jansen was supported by the National Institutes of Health/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute grant 5T32HL110952–05.
Disclosure statement: None of the authors have any conflicts of interest.
More than two hours of homework may be counterproductive, research suggests.
A Stanford education researcher found that too much homework can negatively affect kids, especially their lives away from school, where family, friends and activities matter. "Our findings on the effects of homework challenge the traditional assumption that homework is inherently good," wrote Denise Pope , a senior lecturer at the Stanford Graduate School of Education and a co-author of a study published in the Journal of Experimental Education . The researchers used survey data to examine perceptions about homework, student well-being and behavioral engagement in a sample of 4,317 students from 10 high-performing high schools in upper-middle-class California communities. Along with the survey data, Pope and her colleagues used open-ended answers to explore the students' views on homework. Median household income exceeded $90,000 in these communities, and 93 percent of the students went on to college, either two-year or four-year. Students in these schools average about 3.1 hours of homework each night. "The findings address how current homework practices in privileged, high-performing schools sustain students' advantage in competitive climates yet hinder learning, full engagement and well-being," Pope wrote. Pope and her colleagues found that too much homework can diminish its effectiveness and even be counterproductive. They cite prior research indicating that homework benefits plateau at about two hours per night, and that 90 minutes to two and a half hours is optimal for high school. Their study found that too much homework is associated with: • Greater stress : 56 percent of the students considered homework a primary source of stress, according to the survey data. Forty-three percent viewed tests as a primary stressor, while 33 percent put the pressure to get good grades in that category. Less than 1 percent of the students said homework was not a stressor. • Reductions in health : In their open-ended answers, many students said their homework load led to sleep deprivation and other health problems. The researchers asked students whether they experienced health issues such as headaches, exhaustion, sleep deprivation, weight loss and stomach problems. • Less time for friends, family and extracurricular pursuits : Both the survey data and student responses indicate that spending too much time on homework meant that students were "not meeting their developmental needs or cultivating other critical life skills," according to the researchers. Students were more likely to drop activities, not see friends or family, and not pursue hobbies they enjoy. A balancing act The results offer empirical evidence that many students struggle to find balance between homework, extracurricular activities and social time, the researchers said. Many students felt forced or obligated to choose homework over developing other talents or skills. Also, there was no relationship between the time spent on homework and how much the student enjoyed it. The research quoted students as saying they often do homework they see as "pointless" or "mindless" in order to keep their grades up. "This kind of busy work, by its very nature, discourages learning and instead promotes doing homework simply to get points," said Pope, who is also a co-founder of Challenge Success , a nonprofit organization affiliated with the GSE that conducts research and works with schools and parents to improve students' educational experiences.. Pope said the research calls into question the value of assigning large amounts of homework in high-performing schools. Homework should not be simply assigned as a routine practice, she said. "Rather, any homework assigned should have a purpose and benefit, and it should be designed to cultivate learning and development," wrote Pope. High-performing paradox In places where students attend high-performing schools, too much homework can reduce their time to foster skills in the area of personal responsibility, the researchers concluded. "Young people are spending more time alone," they wrote, "which means less time for family and fewer opportunities to engage in their communities." Student perspectives The researchers say that while their open-ended or "self-reporting" methodology to gauge student concerns about homework may have limitations – some might regard it as an opportunity for "typical adolescent complaining" – it was important to learn firsthand what the students believe. The paper was co-authored by Mollie Galloway from Lewis and Clark College and Jerusha Conner from Villanova University.
Clifton B. Parker is a writer at the Stanford News Service .
⟵ Go to all Research Stories
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter.
Stanford Graduate School of Education
482 Galvez Mall Stanford, CA 94305-3096 Tel: (650) 723-2109
Improving lives through learning
© Stanford University , Stanford , California 94305 .
Hi, what are you looking for?
In most of the world school has been in session for a few months now, with many students starting to eye-up the upcoming holiday breaks. One reason for this is tiredness. The extent of how tired many students are comes via a survey from Sleep Cycle , who produce an app to help people to monitor the quality of the sleep they are receiving. Multiple studies have shown that present day high school students do not receive an optimal amount of sleep.
The new survey has found that children are seldom getting the recommended 8-10 hours of sleep each night. Nearly half (46 percent) of parents have reported that their children get 7 hours or less of sleep each night. One factor influencing this is homework. The survey found that the vast majority (88 percent) of teens have reported how they regularly need to stay up late to finish school projects. Here some 59 percent state they need to have these late night cramming sessions on a weekly or daily basis.
The survey was conducted of over 1,000 U.S. adults and teens, with interviewed conducted by Propeller Research on behalf of Sleep Cycle, and provided to Digital Journal. The questionnaires took place in September 2018, and the results have not been published elsewhere. The headline finding is that homework keeps students up too late. Coupled with early school start times leads to many students falling asleep in class.
Without sufficient sleep, parents report that their children:
Are moody — 64 percent, Are grumpy and disagreeable — 61 percent, Get into more trouble at school — 28 percent, Make worse life choices — 20 percent.
A factor that both parents and teens report as not helping the situation is the school start time. Here 52 percent of parents and 61 percent of teens are of the view that school starts too early. The students report that their school work suffers because of the early start time and that early school start times inhibit them from being productive later in the day. Conversely a alter start time as seen as something that would lead to more productive class work.
According to the National Sleep Foundation : “When schools shift their schedules, teens benefit. For example, seven high schools in Minneapolis moved their start times from 7:25 a.m. to 8:30 a.m. and tested the outcomes for their students. As a result of the change, the teens got five or more extra hours of sleep per week, and attendance and enrollment rates went up, as did alertness. Meanwhile, student-reported depression went down.”
Sleep Cycle, along with many parents and teens, is pushing for a change to schooling policy.
Dr. Tim Sandle is Digital Journal's Editor-at-Large for science news. Tim specializes in science, technology, environmental, business, and health journalism. He is additionally a practising microbiologist; and an author. He is also interested in history, politics and current affairs.
Op-ed: ai moves into defense in australia — the piece of string just got a lot longer.
Jilon vanover talks about the new film ‘murder company’.
You may also like:.
Soemwhere the haunted popup they called America sighed in the silence.
The Seine has been clean enough to swim for most of the past 12 days, Paris city hall said Friday.
Filmmaker Dar Dowling chatted about directing her latest film "Hineni" and being a part of the digital age.
Actress Amy Tsang (The CW’s "Kung Fu") chatted about "Stars Wars: The Acolyte," and she remembers the late "General Hospital" actor Johnny Wactor.
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
To investigate associations of adolescents' time spent on homework/studying with nocturnal time for sleep and depression symptoms, in a competitive academic environment.
According to Oxford Learning, homework can have other negative effects on students. In their article, Oxford Learning remarks, "56 percent of students considered homework a primary source of stress. Too much homework can result in lack of sleep, headaches, exhaustion, and weight loss". Similarly, Stanford Medicine News Center reports that ...
How does homework affect teens' sleep and school performance? Find out the surprising results from a survey by Better Sleep Council.
Results: Time in bed for sleep and media use were inversely related with homework/studying duration on both school days and weekends, adjusting for time spent on other activities and demographic variables. Face-to-face family time and hanging out with friends were also reciprocally related with homework/studying duration on weekends.
Explore our in-depth analysis on "how does homework affect students sleep", including impacts on stress, mental health, and suggested changes for a balanced education system.
Homework, Sleep, and the Student Brain. At some point, every parent wishes their high school aged student would go to bed earlier as well as find time to pursue their own passions -- or maybe even choose to relax. This thought reemerged as I reread Anna Quindlen's commencement speech, A Short Guide to a Happy Life.
According to research from the Better Sleep Council, homework, rather than social pressure, is the number-one cause of teenage stress, negatively affecting their sleep and ultimately impacting their academic performance.
Be mindful of how homework, extracurricular activities and after-school jobs can affect the goals you set. Often teens want to do as much as they can, but if the activities are too time-consuming, it may lead to a more significant amount of lost sleep.
New survey data released from Sleep Cycle, an alarm clock app, reveals how school schedules affect the quality and quantity of sleep for kids and teens.
Sleep research shows how homework is harmful. "More than 70 percent of high school students average less than 8 hours of sleep," according to an October 1 research letter in JAMA Pediatrics ( "Dose-Dependent Associations Between Sleep Duration and Unsafe Behaviors Among US High School Students" ). "Falling short of the 8 to 10 hours ...
Getting enough rest is important for all students from kindergartners to collegiates. Early wake-up times, daylong course schedules, homework requirements, and extracurricular activities can all interfere with a student's sleep schedule and leave them feeling tired in class the next day.
High homework burden had both short-term and long-term associations with adolescent neurobehavioral problems, with stronger associations among girls, and sleep-insufficiency may mediate such associations in a sex-specific manner.
If the student goes to sleep at 10 PM and gets up at 6 AM ( a typical wake time around here for high school students), this allows 8 hours of sleep. However, the typical teenager requires between 8.5-9 hours of sleep per night, so even a teen with good sleep habits generally sleep deprived. In Boston, this problem is frequently exaggerated by ...
Here at HBHS, this is a typical homework assignment from an AP level class. The amount of homework a student has can have disastrous effects on their health and sleep schedule. "Kids shouldn't be given more than two hours of homework a day, [preferably] one hour a day outside of school," said Christina Ellis.
The prospective associations between homework burdens and adolescent neurobehavioral problems, and whether sleep-durations mediated and sex modified s…
As the school year gets underway, balancing children's homework and bedtime routine can feel like a tightrope walk for parents. And the struggle is real—on one hand, it's important for children to get enough sleep to support their cognitive development, memory consolidation, and learning. On the other hand, there's a lot of homework to be done!
The consequences of sleep deprivation and daytime sleepiness are especially problematic to college students and can result in lower grade point averages, increased risk of academic failure, compromised learning, impaired mood, and increased risk of motor vehicle accidents. This article reviews the current prevalence of sleepiness and sleep ...
Homework stresses kids out; there is no way around this fact. The combination of heavy homework loads and early school start times is a major cause of sleep deprivation and consequent stress in teens, but this can be a problem even in younger kids.
This 19-question survey assesses seven underlying components including sleep quality, latency, duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleep medications, and daytime dysfunction over the past month.
More than two hours of homework may be counterproductive, research suggests GSE scholar Denise Pope finds that students in high-achieving schools who spend too much time on homework experience more stress and health problems.
Results Time in bed for sleep and media use were inversely related with homework/studying duration on both school days and weekends, adjusting for time spent on other activities and demographic variables. Face-to-face family time and hanging out with friends were also reciprocally related with homework/studying duration on weekends.
Getting enough sleep is essential for people's mental and physical wellbeing. However, there are times when a person needs to stay up all night for homework, studying, or work.
Nearly half (46 percent) of parents have reported that their children get 7 hours or less of sleep each night. One factor influencing this is homework. The survey found that the vast majority (88 ...