thesis in russian language

Russian Studies

• Getting Started
• Find Articles
• Find Primary Sources
• Find Videos
• Chicago/Turabian Style
• Annotated Bibliographies
• Literature Reviews
• All about Dissertations

Featured Resource: Davidson Honors Theses

What is a thesis, why write a thesis are they necessary, how are theses formatted, tips for writing theses, resources for writing theses.

• Davidson Honors Theses A collection of Davidson theses that have earned departmental honors

Theses are comprehensive research projects completed at the undergraduate level. They encourage independent research, motivating students to contribute knowledge to a field of their choosing. Most theses have two overarching goals: to examine and critique existing scholarly literature, and to contribute a unique voice to the conversation. This second goal can either be met through experimental research, or though deeply analyzing existing research.

No Davidson students are required to write theses. However, many students may find writing theses to be advantageous. For example, theses can fulfill most major's capstone requirements.

Writing a thesis is also a required to earn academic honors in the following programs:

• Africana Studies
• Anthropology
• Chinese Studies
• Communication Studies
• Digital & Screen Media
• Educational Studies
• Environmental Studies
• French Studies
• Gender and Sexuality Studies
• German Studies
• Global Literacy Theory
• Hispanic Studies
• History 
• Languages and Cultures of the Middle East
• Latin American Studies
• Linguistics
• Mathematics and Computer Science
• Neuroscience
• Political Science 
• Public health
• Religious Studies
• Russian Language and literature

Theses are focused on answering a central research question. This question, chosen by the student, should be well-defined and set the tone for the paper. There are five parts to the typical modern theses: 

• Part one: your research question, briefly foreshadowing the paper.
• Part two: reviews the existing research and conversation in your subject area. 
• Part three: lays out the methodology you used to complete your research.
• Part four: present your results.
• Part five: interprets and analyzes your results, and compares your conclusions to those found in pre-existing research. 

If your professor asks you to follow a different format, you should do so. If you need help formatting a thesis, please contact your professor or a librarian. 

• Set deadlines.  Theses are often year-long projects, and can occasionally be over 100 pages long.* In undertaking a project of such magnitude, it's incredibly important to stay on track. 
• Never stop researching.  Beyond directly researching your topic, it may be helpful to read scholarly journals and other completed theses.  Here , you can find a collection of Davidson theses (from 2013 to 2020) that have earned departmental honors. 
• Think about defense.  It's common practice to defend your thesis after submitting it. This includes presenting your thesis, and answering questions about it. It's important to prepare for this question-and-answer session by anticipating questions and formulating answers.
• Stay motivated.  Your thesis marks your transformation from student to academic. It can occasionally determine your career course or be your first published work. A thesis is much more work than a typical assignment, but has incredible potential to define you!

* This chart  plots the average thesis length for programs at Davidson. 

• << Previous: All about Dissertations
• Last Updated: Jul 10, 2024 2:23 PM
• URL: https://davidson.libguides.com/russian

Mailing Address : Davidson College - E.H. Little Library, 209 Ridge Road, Box 5000, Davidson, NC 28035

Scholars' Bank

Russian, east european, and eurasian studies theses and dissertations.

• By Issue Date

Search within this collection:

Recent Submissions

• Foreignization and Domestication in Translation on the Example of Alice in Wonderland  Kostiuchenko, Mariia ( University of Oregon , 2022-10-04 ) In this thesis I would like to compare the principles of domestication and foreignization in translation using the examples of the Russian translations of Lewis Carroll’s Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland (commonly just ...
• Maximilian Voloshin between Spirit and Matter  LEONENKO, ELENA ( University of Oregon , 2021-09-13 ) This thesis considers in tandem the verbal and visual production of the Russian modernist poet and artist Maximilian Voloshin (1877-1932), whose work, I argue, was polarized between the spiritual and the material realms. ...
• From Aral-Sea to Salt-Soil in Abdizhamil Nurpeisov's "Final Respects". Gender, Kazakh Ecocriticism and the Soviet Modernisation Mirage in the Steppe.  Zabel, Verena ( University of Oregon , 2021-09-13 ) In my thesis, I am analysing Soviet Kazakh writer Abdizhamil Nurpeisov's novel Final Respects. I argue that Nurpeisov's novel presents both environmentalist criticism and a multivocal description of Soviet Kazakh identity. ...
• The Networked Public Sphere in Moscow: How Young Adults Navigate Social Media and the Online Space  Smith, Kyle ( University of Oregon , 2020-12-08 ) In this thesis I examine how social media and the internet function as an alternative to Habermas’ public sphere and their potential to facilitate public discourse in the Russian Federation. Using in-depth interviews ...
• Arcadian Ruins: Remains of the Past in Contemporary Russian Art  Vikulina, Nadezhda ( University of Oregon , 2020-09-24 ) This thesis considers the subversive ways contemporary Russian art offers of looking at the ruins left by the recent Soviet past. It focuses on works of poetry and photography that capture the transformation of the landscape ...
• From Prophecy to Parody: Shamakha in the Russian Romantic Imagination  Jalilov, Murad ( University of Oregon , 2019-09-18 ) This thesis seeks to explore the role of the Azerbaijani city of Shamakha and the image of its ruler, the Shamakhan Queen in Pavel Katenin’s "Kniazna Milusha" and Alexander Pushkin’s "Skazka o Zolotom Petushke". In order ...
• Akram Aylisli, Village Prose, World Literature  Orte, Peter ( University of Oregon , 2019-09-18 ) This thesis takes Akram Aylisli’s Farewell, Aylis as an occasion to dwell on World Literature. Tracing Aylisli’s development as a Soviet writer of Azerbaijani “village prose,” I follow the displacements of the village ...
• Aspectual Prefix Variation in the Novel Russian Verbs  Gordeeva, Ksenia ( University of Oregon , 2019-01-11 ) The study compared prefix variation in novel verbs to prefix variation in standard Russian. Thirty-seven native speakers of Russian participated in the designed experiment. The experiment elicited the perfective verbs ...
• The Physiology of Literature: A.A. Ukhtomskii and the Principle of the Dominant  Osadchuk, Svetlana ( University of Oregon , 2018-09-06 ) THESIS ABSTRACT Svetlana R. Osadchuk Master of Arts
 Russian, and East European, and Eurasian Studies Program
 June 2018
 Title: The Physiology of Literature: A.A. Ukhtomskii and The Principle of The Dominant Russian ...
• Russia's Hybrid Warfare: The Prowess and Limitations of Putin's (In)Visible Hand in Estonia and Latvia  Casselman, Rachel ( University of Oregon , 2017-09-06 ) Russia’s recent increase in acts of aggression against bordering nations is concerning. After Russia’s annexation of Ukraine’s Crimean peninsula, many wondered if the world should anticipate a Baltic intervention. This ...
• Can the United States and Russia Cooperate? Analyzing the results of bilateral and multilateral cooperation on the Syrian conflict  Ward, Peter ( University of Oregon , 2017-09-06 ) The discourse regarding US/Russia relations focuses intensely on the competitive nature between these two powers. Policy makers echo strategies of the past by making recommendations which embrace competitiveness and mutual ...
• Perception of pragmatic appropriateness of Russian Imperatives: The Case of L2 Learners and Heritage Learners of Russian  Tsylina, Marina ( University of Oregon , 2016-10-27 ) The study compared 10 fluent second language learners (L2Ls) and 10 heritage learners of Russian (HLs) to monolingual controls (n=20) in their judgments of the subtle nuances of aspectual usage in direct positive and ...
• The Paradoxical Interrelationship of Church and State in Post-Communist Russia: The Rise and Manifestation of Power via the Prism of LGBTQIA Rights  Zhdanov, Alekcander ( University of Oregon , 2016-10-27 ) The Russian Orthodox Church is seeking to reestablish a leadership role in the spiritual health of the citizenry in post-Communist Russia via a concerted effort to forge an alliance with the Russian government, regardless ...
• The Eye in Lermontov’s "A Hero of Our Time": Perception, Visuality, and Gender Relations  Zagoruyko, Iryna ( University of Oregon , 2016-10-27 ) This thesis views Lermontov’s novel "A Hero of Our Time" as centered on images, glances and vision. In his text Lermontov conveys a persistent fascination with visual perception. The attentive reader can read this language ...
• Orphic Mythologemes in Marina Tsvetaeva’s Oeuvre  Savenko-Moore, Anastasia ( University of Oregon , 2016-02-23 ) This thesis explores Orphic mythologemes and tropes in Marina Tsvetaeva’s works in order to identify whether they create a personalized semantic system in her oeuvre. I review such themes as the “supernatural powers” of ...
• "To Rasshcheplennoe Iadro": From Lucretian Swerve to Sundered Core in Shalamov’s Atomnaia poema  Larson, Kirstin ( University of Oregon , 2015-08-18 ) Varlam Shalamov's Atomnaia poema addresses a primordial "wish to split" at the core of nature and within the human heart. This wish to split is informed by Shalamov's Gulag experience as well as his reflections on Auschwitz ...
• Beyond the Feminine in Pushkin's Tatiana  Spreat, Eric ( University of Oregon , 2015-08-18 ) Pushkin's Tatiana tends to be pigeonholed by criticism that acknowledges her dynamism and openness to creative possibilities but restricts her intertextual significance to the heroines of the European novelists she herself ...
• Poetics of Lev Tolstoy's Kholstomer  Forehand, Paul ( University of Oregon , 2014-09-29 ) This thesis contains an analysis of the ways in which form and content are combined to create significance within a text, as well as an exploration of the ways in which the mechanics of didactic fiction convey this ...
• Gender Assignment of Russian Indeclinable Nouns  Wang, Qiang ( University of Oregon , 2014-09-29 ) This thesis analyzes the grammatical gender assignment of Russian indeclinable nouns. Chapter I focuses on gender and agreement in Russian nouns. Previous assignment models failed to account for the non-neuter gender of a ...
• Representations of Revolution and Revolutionaries in Early Twentieth Century Russian Literature  Moore, Rick ( University of Oregon , 2014-09-29 ) The representation of Revolution and revolutionaries develops as one of the main themes in Russian literary texts of the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. It would not be an overstatement to say that most active ...

View more submissions

Search Scholars' Bank

All of scholars' bank, this collection.

• Butler, Michael (1)
• Casselman, Rachel (1)
• Dooley, Kathryn Amelia, 1984- (1)
• Forehand, Paul (1)
• Gordeeva, Ksenia (1)
• Gunderson, Alexis Kathryn, 1986- (1)
• Jalilov, Murad (1)
• James, Kyler Rumsey (1)
• Kostiuchenko, Mariia (1)
• Kulikova, Yulia A., 1985- (1)
• ... View More
• East European studies (2)
• Literature (2)
• Russian history (2)
• Slavic literature (2)
• Abortion (1)
• Alcohol (1)
• Alcoholism -- Russia (Federation) (1)

Date Issued

• 2020 - 2022 (5)
• 2010 - 2019 (28)
• 2008 - 2009 (3)

Has File(s)

• Most Popular Items
• Statistics by Country
• Most Popular Authors

St Andrews Research Repository

•   St Andrews Research Repository
• Modern Languages (School of)

Russian Theses

• Register / Login

By Issue Date Names Titles Subjects Classification Type Funder

Search within this collection:

The Department if Russian has a proven track record of excellence in teaching and combines this with internationally recognised research in a range of fields including literature and thought from the nineteenth to the twenty-first centuries.

For more information please visit the Department of Russian home page.

This material is presented to ensure timely dissemination of scholarly and technical work. Copyright and all rights therein are retained by authors or by other copyright holders. All persons copying this information are expected to adhere to the terms and constraints invoked by each author's copyright. In most cases, these works may not be reposted without the explicit permission of the copyright holder.

Recent Submissions

Hybrid war and visual performances in digital donbas militarism , simeon denisov's 'istoria o otsekh i stradal'tsekh solovetskikh' in the old believer tradition in russia , between two worlds : the fairy-tale novels of aleksandr fomich vel'tman , the work of aleksandr grin (1880-1932) : a study of grin's philosophical outlook , 'post-soviet neo-modernism' : an approach to 'postmodernism' and humour in the post-soviet russian fiction of vladimir sorokin, vladimir tuchkov and aleksandr khurgin .

Slavic Languages and Literatures

Ph.d. requirements.

Ph.D. Requirements in Slavic and Eurasian Literatures and Cultures

Contact the Slavic Director of Graduate Studies with any questions about the Ph.D. requirements. More detailed information can be found in the Graduate Student Handbook .

Language Competency and Expectations

All entering students are expected to have sufficient knowledge of Russian to allow for satisfactory work at the graduate level and are required to pass a departmental proficiency examination in Russian. If needed, students are expected to augment their language proficiency with summer study, undergraduate classes, or individualized tutorials.

Students must also demonstrate competence in a second foreign language, as soon as possible or by the beginning of the fifth term of study. Students may choose to pursue proficiency in a second Slavic language; in a language useful for broader access to scholarship (often German or French in past years); in another relevant Eastern European or Eurasian language; or in any language relevant for well-motivated comparative work.

Course Requirements

All graduate students are required to take sixteen courses in their first two years of graduate study. Students are strongly encouraged to take ownership over their individualized programs of study and to explore diverse options both within and outside the Slavic Department.

All graduate students pursuing the Ph.D. in Russian Literature and Culture must take “Proseminar: Theory and Methods” (RUSS 851). In addition to this one mandatory course, all students must fulfill the following distributional requirements through graduate-level coursework:

Minimum of one course on Slavic literature or culture before the eighteenth century

Minimum of one course on eighteenth-century Slavic literature or culture

Minimum of two courses on nineteenth-century Slavic literature or culture

Minimum of two courses on twentieth-century Slavic literature or culture

Minimum of one course on twenty-first-century Slavic literature or culture

Minimum of two (but no more than four out of the required sixteen) courses outside the Slavic Department. 

Teaching Fellowships

Since the faculty consider teaching to be an integral part of graduate training, all graduate students are expected to teach for a total of four semesters (typically in the third and fourth years of study). Students are usually assigned two semesters of language teaching, during which time they are mentored and trained by a lead language lector, and two semesters of literature/culture teaching, for which they either run discussion sections for large-enrollment lecture courses, or serve as instructor-apprentices in small undergraduate seminars.

Minor Field Portfolio

As part of their program of study, students are responsible for developing a minor field of specialization in one of the following: (1) a second language or literature; (2) visual culture or one of the other arts; (3) a topic in intellectual history or a specific interdisciplinary approach; or (4) another discipline relevant to their primary interests. The minor field requirement is intended to offer students the opportunity to develop a meaningful expertise beyond their primary specializations in Russian literature and culture and often entails acquiring a familiarity with the driving questions and methodologies of another discipline.

Qualifying Paper

Students must submit a qualifying paper no later than September 1st of their third year. The paper, which in many cases will be a revised version of a seminar paper, should be developed in consultation with a faculty adviser. The paper should highlight original research and an ambitious conceptualization, possess a logical structure, and be clearly written.

The Comprehensive Examination and the Departmental Reading List

In early October of their third year, students will take a comprehensive examination on Russian literature and culture from the nineteenth century to the present. The comprehensive is split into two 6-hour take-home exams. This exam is meant to test the students’ knowledge of the broad scope of Russian literature and culture, as well as their ability to analyze various kinds of cultural products and position specific works within their historical, cultural, and critical contexts.

Students should use the   departmental reading list as a guide in preparing for this exam, but they are also welcome to draw from beyond the list in their answers. The reading list, which is periodically revised with faculty and student input, serves as the foundation for well-rounded erudition in Russian literature.  Students are expected to build on it based on their academic interests and research needs. We do not include other media or literary traditions in the reading list, and instead encourage students with serious interests (in film or in Polish literature, for example) to develop rigorous independent lists in consultation with specializing faculty. We provide opportunities to do so through minor field requirements and specialized qualifying exam reading lists.

The Qualifying Examination

In early December of their third year, students will take a qualifying examination based on two specialized reading lists. This exam is a one-hour oral exam with twenty-five minutes allotted to each list. The exam is meant to test the student’s knowledge of two specific areas of study, which often serve as important preparation for the development of a dissertation topic. For example, a student planning to write a dissertation on the nineteenth-century Russian realist novel might create a specialized list on the French and English realist novels or realism in music; or a student planning to write on post-Soviet drama might create a list on theories of performance in Russia and elsewhere.

The Pre-Prospectus Colloquium

In early February, after the successful completion of the comprehensive and qualifying examinations, students will present a preliminary version of their dissertation prospectus to a colloquium attended by all Slavic ladder faculty.

The Prospectus Presentation

In early April, students will present the final version of their dissertation prospectus to all students and faculty in the department. The prospectus presentation will take one hour, beginning with a ten-minute introduction by the student and followed by forty-five minutes of questions and suggestions from everyone in attendance. The point of including all faculty and students is to provide the student with as much feedback as possible, to give rising students a sense of what awaits them, and to foster collegiality in the department by making everyone aware of what others are working on.   

Admission to Candidacy and the M.Phil. Degree

To be admitted to candidacy, students must fulfill all of the graduate school and department pre-dissertation requirements described above and must be in good academic standing with the department. 

Students may petition the Graduate School to receive an en route M.Phil. degree. This can be done in the semester the student expects to complete all pre-dissertation requirements.

The Dissertation The dissertation is the culmination of the student’s work in the doctoral program and an important emblem of professional competence, intellectual rigor, and academic potential. As such, it should demonstrate mastery of a defined field of research and should articulate an original and substantive contribution to knowledge. While all dissertations should have clearly defined empirical and theoretical stakes and be grounded in appropriate methodological choices, each project will approach its central questions in necessarily distinct ways: some based more heavily in archival research, others shaped more profoundly by theoretical discussions, and still others determined by entirely different disciplinary or interdisciplinary demands. While working on their dissertation, students should remain attuned to questions of writerly craft and should strive for clarity and liveliness of their academic prose.

The First Chapter Talk

During the spring semester of the fourth year, students will deliver a forty-five-minute talk on their first chapter to the entire Slavic Department. This event is intended to serve not only as an early dissertation benchmark, but also as an opportunity for students to gain essential experience writing and delivering a long lecture.

Professional Development

The Yale Slavic Department is equally supportive of students who hope to follow a traditional academic path, students who embark on non-academic or hybrid careers, and students who change their minds throughout their course of study. Support for academic careers typically involves the faculty advisers’ intensive review of application materials (cover letters, CVs, research and teaching statements), mock interviews with faculty, mock job talks with the whole department, and assistance in negotiating offers. Departmental support for non-academic careers is more variable, but might involve writing letters of recommendation or assistance identifying potential mentors.

It is also important to note that in the Yale Slavic Department professional advising does not end with the student’s graduation. Former advisers and advisees are encouraged to remain in contact after graduation, so that the department can support alumni who are moving through postdoctoral fellowships or visiting positions, navigating a switch from one kind of employment to another, or in search of a permanent or more favorable position.

Department of Slavic Languages and Literatures

The slavic department and the program in russian, eastern european and eurasian studies express solidarity with ukraine.

For more on the department and program on Ukraine solidarity...

Slavic Languages and Literatures

Teaching Russian Language and Literature since the 1940s...

Film Screening April 25th, 2024 at 4:30pm. Location: Lewis Simpson Building Room A71

“Learn more about the courses we offer, our minor program and what our students do once they graduate .”

Serguei Oushakine publishes a two-volume anthology of early Soviet formalist and constructivist texts. Photo by Yuri Leving

Step inside a fairytale in Tallin, Estonia "Summer Program at Tallin University"

WELCOME BACK IN THREE DIMENSIONS!

--Cordially, The Slavic Faculty

The illustration: Wassily Kandinsky, The Muses

Heritage Russian at Princeton

Do you wonder why your Russian grandmother believes you can catch cold from a draft or if you do not wear slippers in the house?

New Book By Professor Serguei Oushakine

Undergraduate

The Slavic Department aspires to develop in its majors a critically informed appreciation for the literature and culture of Russia and the Slavic world.

The Department of Slavic Languages and Literatures welcomes intellectually curious students seeking to understand the cultures and societies of Russia and Eastern Europe. 

The Princeton Slavic Department Ph.D. program provides students with a firm foundation in their major area as well as the opportunity to explore related fields.

Princeton in St. Petersburg

Currently suspended until further notice. Established in 2004, the Princeton in St. Petersburg Program offers Princeton undergraduates a unique chance to improve their knowledge of Russian language and culture during a two-month summer course in St. Petersburg, the cultural capital of Russia.

Program in Russian, East European and Eurasian Studies

The Slavic Department works closely with the REEES to develop interdisciplinary undergraduate and graduate courses and lectures. REEES offers a certificate track for undergraduates, and funding to support research and language study.

Slavic Digital Humanities Working Group

In conjunction with the Center for Digital Humanities, the Slavic DH Working group will hold workshops, talks, and other events beginning fall 2017. The working group features many ongoing projects, including Playing Soviet: The Visual Language of Early Soviet Children's Books, 1917-1953. 

Master of Arts in Applied Languages in Russian

Acquire specific skills, knowledge, and experience applicable to an individual career path with our one-year MA in Applied Languages in Russian with a specialization in Diplomacy.

Students spend a summer in Vermont at the School of Russian followed by an academic year at Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO) in Moscow, Russia, and a final summer in Russia or Vermont. Students take academic coursework in traditional subjects, interdisciplinary areas, and pre-professional disciplines, with a focus on diplomacy and related fields, and complete an internship or thesis related to this specialization.

The MA program consists of 12 courses, beginning with a summer in Vermont (3 courses). Students who choose the Internship Track will register for 8 courses during the academic year in Russia and complete an internship during the final summer, which counts as a course. Students who choose the Thesis Track will register for 6 courses during the academic year in Russia and return to Vermont for a final summer, during which they will defend the thesis. The thesis will be based on research conducted during the academic year and drafted by the end of the spring term.

Specialization in Diplomacy

I. internship track.

Summer in Vermont (6-week session): 3 courses

• Advanced Russian for Graduate Students
• Elective in Russian culture, civilization, or society
• Elective in any area (literature, politics, history, film, linguistics, popular culture, etc.)

Fall semester in Moscow, Russia: 4 courses

Four courses in international relations, global and regional studies, and the history and practice of diplomacy. Required courses may include:

• History of International Relations (Part 1)
• Institutions of Modern Diplomacy
• The Role of Diplomacy in Solving Global and Regional Problems
• Language of Diplomacy (Part 1) or History of Russian Philosophy

Spring semester in Moscow, Russia: 4 courses

Required courses may include:

• History of International Relations (Part 2)
• Legal Framework and Practice of the Consular Service
• Situational Diplomatic Workshop / Fundamentals of the Negotiation Process
• Language of Diplomacy (Part 2) or Russian Foreign Policy

Final summer in Russia: counts as 1 course

Academically directed internship; the School in Russia will assist you in identifying an appropriate internship.

II. Thesis Track

Fall semester in Moscow, Russia: 3 courses plus research

Three courses in international relations, global and regional studies, and the history and practice of diplomacy. Required courses may include:

Thesis research begins on an approved topic in diplomacy, international relations, or a related field; a thesis advisor is assigned

Spring semester in Moscow, Russia: 3 courses plus research

• Situational Diplomatic Workshop: Fundamentals of the Negotiation Process

Thesis research continues; student completes draft by end of term

Final summer in Vermont: 3 courses including thesis

• Completion of thesis
• Defense of thesis at Graduate Symposium, a mini conference at which traditional and applied MA students present their work to fellow students and faculty

McGill Alert / Alerte de McGill

McGill Alert . The downtown campus will remain partially closed through the evening of Monday, July 15. See the Campus Safety site for details.

Alerte de McGill . Le campus du centre-ville restera partiellement fermé jusqu’au lundi 15 juillet, en soirée. Complément d’information : Direction de la protection et de la prévention . 

Main navigation

• Undergraduate
• Work with us
• W 2024 Course Syllabi (UPDATING...)

• German Graduate Studies
• Hispanic Graduate Studies
• Italian Graduate Studies

Russian Graduate Studies

• Digital Humanities

The Department of Languages, Literatures, and Cultures - Russian and Slavic Studies offers graduate instruction at both the MA and PhD levels. Our faculty specialize in 19th and 20th century Russian literature and culture, working in such areas as the Russian Novel, Dostoevsky, Chekhov, Russian Modernism, Russian Romanticism, High Stalinist Culture, Post-Soviet culture, cultural mythology, intertextuality, and women's studies. We offer a broad and flexible range of graduate seminars and our small but dynamic program allows for a great deal of personal attention, an atmosphere of collegiality, and a close-knit intellectual community.

McGill University is world renowned for its academic rigour and scholarly achievements. Located in Montreal, a cosmopolitan and vibrant city, it provides a fascinating intellectual and cultural setting for serious graduate studies.

The Department offers graduate instruction (seminar and guided independent reading courses) as well as research and thesis supervision in the fields of Russian culture and literature. Particular emphasis is laid on working with the original language; practicum courses may be allotted, at the discretion of the Department, to course work leading to advanced proficiency in this area.

Please direct all questions concerning the program of study to the Graduate Program director:  laura.beraha [at] mcgill.ca (Laura Beraha)

Program Information

• Master of Arts - Russian Studies (Thesis) 
• Doctor of Philosophy - Russian Studies

Master of Arts - Russian Studies (Thesis)

Program requirement:, thesis courses (27 credits).

The Thesis Proposal is normally submitted for review by the Department Graduate Committee at the end of the second term of residency. Candidates should consult the Department Thesis Proposal Guidelines.

Russian (Arts): Independent research under the supervision of the thesis advisor(s) leading to a thesis proposal.

Offered by: Languages,Literatures,Cultures

• To be submitted to the supervisor by the end of the first year of the MA program, April 30th or November 30th as the case may be. Candidates must consult the Thesis Proposal Guidelines prepared by the Russian Studies Graduate Committee.
• Winter 2025
• There are no professors associated with this course for the 2024-2025 academic year

Russian (Arts): Written presentation of the thesis to the research supervisor(s).

Complementary Courses (18 credits)

12-18 credits of graduate coursework in the Department

0-6 credits of graduate coursework outside the Department, subject to approval by the Department Graduate Committee.

Doctor of Philosophy -Russian Studies

A thesis for the doctoral degree must constitute original scholarship and must be a distinct contribution to knowledge. It must show familiarity with previous work in the field and must demonstrate ability to plan and carry out research, organize results, and defend the approach and conclusions in a scholarly manner. The research presented must meet current standards of the discipline; as well, the thesis must clearly demonstrate how the research advances knowledge in the field. Finally, the thesis must be written in compliance with norms for academic and scholarly expression and for publication in the public domain.

Required Courses

Russian (Arts): Supervised preparation for the candidate's two designated Major Fields in the PhD Comprehensive Examination.

• Prerequisite: Permission of the Department Graduate Committee.

Russian (Arts): Written and oral examination in two Major and two Minor fields of Russian literature and culture, as determined by the candidate and the Department's Graduate Committee.

• Prerequisites: RUSS 700 and two of: RUSS 750 , RUSS 760 , RUSS 770 .

Russian (Arts): PhD thesis proposal.

Depending on their individual background, students may be asked to take additional coursework as approved by the Department Graduate Committee.

Students must complete two of the following:

Russian (Arts): Exploration of the principal themes and critical issues in Russian historical grammar and the history of the Russian literary language from the 10th century to the present.

• Restriction: Not open to students who have taken RUSS 650D1 /D2.
• This course is not scheduled for the 2024-2025 academic year

Russian (Arts): Exploration of the principal themes and critical issues in Russian literature of the Pre-Petrine period. Comparison with similar problems in the candidate's major fields for the comprehensive examination.

• Restriction: Not open to students who have taken RUSS 660D1 /D2.

Russian (Arts): Exploration of the principal themes and critical issues in Russian literature of the 18th century. Comparison with similar problems in the candidate's major fields for the comprehensive examination.

• Restriction: Not open to students who have taken RUSS 670D1 /D2.

Language Requirement

Proficiency in Russian, functional ability in English and in French, and proficiency in a second Slavic language, if relevant to the research topic and where deemed appropriate by the Department Graduate Committee.

Preparing to Apply

• Applications and Required Documents
• Contact Information

Applicants to Russian Studies should have a high standing in Honours Russian. Further, the Department must be convinced that the candidate for admission has an aptitude for research work and will be able to make an original contribution to knowledge. Any necessary preparation to fulfill these requirements will be offered within the Department or elsewhere at McGill. Certain graduate courses may be taken by arrangement at approved universities.

Detailed instructions on how to apply and how to upload required supporting documents in the new version, please see:

https://www.mcgill.ca/gradapplicants/how-apply

https://www.mcgill.ca/gradapplicants/apply/prepare/checklist/documents .

Deadlines  

Please note that incomplete applications (including letters of recommendation, testing scores (TOEFL, IELTS), transcripts, sample(s) of written work) by the application deadline will not be considered.

Note: Ph.D. students are only considered for Fall admission

For Fall Admission:  January 6 (Canadian/Permanent Resident/International).

For Winter Admission:  September 15 (Canadian/Permanent Resident)

For Winter Admission:  August 1 (International).

Special/Exchange/Visiting:  As above.

Application and Required Documents:

Should you decide to formally apply, all supplemental application materials and supporting documents must be uploaded directly to the McGill admissions processing system. 

Complete instructions : www.mcgill.ca/gradapplicants/apply/submitting-your-documents .

• Online application form.
• Application fee.  You must pay a  non-refundable fee or your application will not be processed.
• All university transcripts. Those transcripts not in English or French must be accompanied by a certified English or French translation (prepared by a licensed translator).
• Research proposal. Applicants are requested to send a brief statement of their interests and the areas they wish to study within the Department (1 to 3 pages).
• Two letters of recommendation. Those letters not in English or French must be accompanied by a certified English or French translation (prepared by a licensed translator). On the application form you must provide the names and email addresses of at least two professors who are familiar with your academic work. McGill will contact these referees and invite them to upload references on your behalf. Please note that although you can list public domain addresses such as Hotmail, Gmail, or Yahoo Mail on the application form, references uploaded from these addresses will not be accepted by the Department. Therefore you must list a valid institutional or corporate e-mail address for your referees.
• One or two samples of written work (in PDF format). This can be in the form of a graded paper, a chapter from a thesis, or an academic article.
• TOEFL (Test of English as a Foreign Language) scores for non-native English applicants. This is a requirement of all students applying whose native language is other than English. Results must be on file by application deadline – Graduate & Postdoctoral Studies no longer process applications without official results. Minimum score of 575 or 231 computer based scale. Please note that permanent residents may be required to submit a TOEFL score. IELTS scores are also acceptable: a band score of 6.5 or greater (Academic module).
• Interview, where appropriate, if necessary by telephone, with members of the Department Graduate Committee (The Graduate Committee of the Department of Languages, Literatures, and Cultures - Russian and Slavic Studies consists of all faculty members of the Department and, where appropriate, scholars invited from related fields). 

Contact Information:

Department of Languages, Literatures, and Cultures McGill University 680 Sherbrooke Street West Montreal, QC, Canada H3A 2M7

info.llcu [at] mcgill.ca (Email) Phone: (514) 398-3650

Department and University Information

Languages, literatures, and cultures.

• Advising office hours

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

• View all journals
• Explore content
• About the journal
• Publish with us
• Sign up for alerts
• Review Article
• Open access
• Published: 15 September 2023

Review of the Russian-language academic literature on university rankings and a global perspective

• Dmitry Kochetkov   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-7890-7532 1 , 2  

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications volume  10 , Article number:  576 ( 2023 ) Cite this article

981 Accesses

1 Citations

1 Altmetric

Metrics details

• Science, technology and society

This year marks 10 years since the start of the Project 5top100. The key goal of the project was the entry of five Russian universities into the top 100 global university rankings; respectively, the rankings have firmly entered the Russian academic and public discourses. This article is aimed at answering the question of how university rankings are interpreted in Russia. We conducted a rigorous peer review of Russian-language academic literature. This part of Russian academic discourse is usually closed for international readership. We have reviewed 64 relevant articles and concluded that most Russian authors consider rankings in terms of competitiveness. Ranking methodology and interpretation are taken uncritically in this case. The review was also supplemented by a brief overview of the global perspective based on major statements in responsible research evaluation. This part of the literature suggests that university rankings should not be used in research evaluation. However, it is still not the case, unfortunately.

Similar content being viewed by others

Relationship between bibliometric indicators and university ranking positions

The effect of national higher education initiatives on university rankings

Territorial bias in university rankings: a complex network approach

Introduction.

In 2020 (quite recently), the implementation of Project 5 – 100 ended in Russia. Three years have passed, but the results are still under heated discussion. Opinions are extremely contradictory: some note positive changes in the number of publications of Russian universities, while others complain about the lack of institutional changes and emergent effects, as well as the unresolved problem of the gap in funding with the world’s leading benchmarks. However, everyone agrees on one point: the main declared goal of the project was not achieved, and five Russian universities did not enter the top 100 of global university rankings. The successor of the project was the Priority-2030 program, which formally moved away from the ranking race. On the other hand, in Priority-2030, some indicators were inherited from Project 5–100, which, in turn, were designed for promotion in global university rankings (even though they have changed a bit). Therefore, the issue of rankings traditionally occupies an important place in Russian academic discourse.

Despite significant differences, there is a strong relationship between global university rankings and research evaluation. The emergence of global rankings is closely related to the neoliberal paradigm of higher education, within which, since the end of the last century, so-called excellence initiatives have emerged. By excellence initiatives, we understand a special type of political initiative aimed at increasing the global competitiveness of the national higher education system and identifying an elite group of national universities. The appearance of the first rankings is closely connected with the excellence initiatives in East Asia (primarily in China). In turn, the emergence of the first Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU) triggered a wave of excellence initiatives in Europe.

However, the rankings only focus on what they measure, which may not be enough to evaluate a system as complex as a university and divert attention from the really important factors. Are indicators of university rankings socially significant? Should society be focused on getting a group of national universities into the top 20 (50, 100, 200, etc.) world rankings? In my opinion, the question sounds even broader, whether universities are just commercial enterprises for the production of knowledge or whether they still have to fulfill a social mission (as understood, for example, by Bernal ( 1939 ) and Draper ( 1964 )). Besides, it remains an open question whether we can call the practice of using university rankings in research assessment responsible in terms of basic documents in research assessment ( San Francisco Declaration on Research Evaluation (DORA) , Leiden Manifesto , Hong Kong Principles for Researcher Evaluation , etc.).

The goal of this academic article is to provide a thorough understanding of how global university rankings are interpreted and understood in Russia. This will be achieved through a rigorous and comprehensive review of the Russian-language academic literature, which will help shed light on the various perspectives and viewpoints emerging from Russia regarding the utilization and interpretation of global university rankings. The selection of Russian literature for this study was purposeful and strategic. The focus on Russian literature aligns with the objectives of Project 5top100 flagship excellence initiative (2013–2020), which was heavily influenced by university rankings. In fact, the project derived its name from the goal of having five Russian universities ranked within the top 100 globally by the year 2020. Besides, that part of the Russian academic discourse that is more or less closed to the international readership will be analyzed. We also highlight the problem from the point of view of global trends.

The article is organized as follows. In the next section, we provide the necessary background for the problems under consideration. The methodology is described in the Section “Data and methods”. Section “Global perspective” provides a brief current snapshot of the global perspective based on the key statements about responsible research assessment. Finally, the Section “Review of Russian literature on university rankings” provides a systematic review of the Russian-language literature on the problem. In the concluding section, we conceptualize the main findings of the paper with implications for further research and practice.

The emergence of global university rankings

The emergence and wide distribution of rankings at the beginning of the 21st century was due to a number of premises. Foremost, one should note here that globalization has penetrated all public spheres, including higher education. Globalization in higher education was expressed in the growing trend of student and academic mobility between countries (in Europe, this was greatly facilitated by the Bologna system). Accordingly, students and faculty needed a transparent tool for comparison and decision-making. However, the competitive situation for universities has changed. For the first time, many universities concluded that they must consider international competitors and need a reliable international benchmarking tool. Thus, the initial intent of rankings was a marketing and benchmarking tool.

How did rankings become part of political discourse and national strategies? The neoliberal paradigm of higher education plays a direct role here, which is characterized by the marketization, industrialization, and commercialization of higher education in a global context (Yuhan, 2022 ). The university is turning into an enterprise to produce knowledge, more specifically, human resources and knowledge assets (intellectual property and publications). Under conditions of knowledge capitalism (Kochetkov and Kochetkova, 2021 ), the effective accumulation of intellectual resources (including talent acquisition) has become a priority for universities, the national system of higher education, and the state as a whole.

The neoliberal paradigm, together with shifts in the global landscape of higher education (the desire to move away from the unipolar system), has resulted in the emergence of excellence initiatives. The first such initiative appeared in China ( Project 211 ). Achieving the goal of the initiatives (Project 211 was followed by Project 985 ([CSL STYLE ERROR: reference with no printed form.])). The aim of these policy initiatives was achieving “world-class” for Chinese universities, and this task required a benchmarking tool. Not surprisingly, the first global university ranking, the Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU), was released in China by Shanghai Jiao Tong University in 2003. In turn, the release of the Shanghai ranking provoked a wave of excellence initiatives in Europe (Hazelkorn and Mihut, 2021 ). Therefore, these two phenomena are closely related.

Hazelkorn and Mihut ( 2021 ) listed 25 global university rankings. In the framework of this study, we will not dwell on each of them in detail. Based on the scope of this study, we focused on the emergence of the Big Three (ARWU, THE, and QS), Leiden Ranking as well as rankings that use an innovative set of metrics, U-Multirank and the Three University Missions. Besides, Webometrics was added to this list because it is distinguished from other rankings by its special focus Footnote 1 .

ARWU came out against the background of ongoing excellence initiatives in China (Projects 211 and 985), so its main task was to digitize the concept of a “world-class university”. The ranking is characterized by a stable methodology that exclusively uses verifiable data. The ranking is also distinguished by the presence of “luxury” indicators, such as the number of employees—Nobel and Fields Prize winners.

The first QS World University Rankings were jointly published by the British company Quacquarelli Symonds , and Times Higher Education magazine. The entry threshold compared to ARWU has been lowered because of the abandonment of luxury indicators. At the same time, 50% of the final index depended on reputation surveys. The QS ranking came under fire from the academic community from the very beginning. Therefore, in 2010 the Times Higher Education magazine released an updated Times Higher Education World University Rankings ; thus, there was a “divorce” of QS and THE. It is noteworthy that THE initially switched to Web of Science publication data, but in 2014, there was a return to cooperation with Elsevier. Compared to the joint QS-THE rating, the changes affected the overweighting of subjective reputation surveys and the skewness of publication metrics towards hard sciences (Lim, 2018 ). Besides, the indicator of industry income was added. To the best of our knowledge, THE is the only Big Four ranking that highlights the university’s innovative activities. Nevertheless, the modest weight of this indicator of 2.5% is surprising: is it really that the university devotes only 1/40 of its activities to innovation and knowledge transfer? Of course, the answer to this question largely depends on the particular university, but it’s still surprising.

The Leiden Ranking is compiled by the Center for Science and Technology Studies of Leiden University (Netherlands). It has several significant differences from those previously described. First, it is purely a bibliometric ranking; thus, this ranking is relatively transparent compared to other rankings Footnote 2 . The second difference is the absence of a composite index as such. As a result, the Leiden Ranking is more of a benchmarking tool. The third difference is the calculation of values in the two versions: size-dependent and size-independent. The second option allows a user to level the scale effect. The ranking methodology is constantly evolving. In particular, the ranking included open access and gender indicators quite recently.

U-Multirank was developed by an international consortium in 2009 as an alternative to ARWU and THE-QS. In 2011, the European Commission decided to fund the implementation of U-Multirank. The ranking methodology stabilized in 2013. It is based on a very wide range of indicators, among which we would especially like to note the presence of a group of indicators that characterize regional engagement. Like the Leiden Ranking, it is rather a benchmarking tool: the user can compare universities in any of the areas by country, region, or subject area.

The Three University Missions is the youngest ranking in the list. It is issued by Moscow State University (Russia). In 2021, the ranking covered 1650 universities from 97 countries; thus, the Three University Missions is one of the most comprehensive global university rankings. The ranking is based on the university’s assessment of three key missions: education, science, and community engagement. Reputation surveys were excluded; however, data from the university’s public records were used.

The Webometrics ranking by Cybermetrics Lab (Spain) is released twice a year. It should be noted that this is by far the most global ranking in terms of enrollment (the latest edition includes 11998 universities). Half of the composite index depends on the number of external links to the university website; the other half depends on publications and citations. A small number of indicators (three) and content distinguish this ranking from the others.

Thus, we can classify university rankings in at least two ways: (1) the calculation of a composite index and (2) the use of reputation surveys (Fig. 1 ).

Classification matrix of rankings.

Most ranking providers also calculate industry or subject rankings (only Webometrics is an exception). We believe that subject rankings are more useful than institutional rankings because an “average” university may not excel in all subject areas, but it may well excel in one or two. Besides, QS and THE release regional rankings, as well as various “special” products (QS Top 50 Under 50, THE Young University Rankings, etc.). In my opinion, the latter is pure marketing in nature, even more than the main rankings from THE and QS.

We did not include the Best Global Universities Ranking (USNWR) in the review because it is popular mainly in North America. On the other hand, American universities are guided mainly by this ranking in their strategies. It should also be noted that the incomplete overlap between different ranking systems does not allow us to speak of the existence of the absolute top 100 in the world (Moed, 2017 ).

University rankings can be viewed in the context of research evaluation. Namely, a number of governments tend to evaluate the effectiveness of project funding by ranking positions (again, the example of the 5top100 initiative in Russia). Indeed, a significant part of the indicators of global university rankings is related to research evaluation. These indicators can be divided into three subgroups.

The first subgroup includes traditional publishing and citation metrics for which the data source is the Web of Science or Scopus (the exception is Webometrics, which uses Google Scholar data). This approach captivates transparency (though, in fact, this is not the case) and simplicity. At the same time, this approach raises a number of questions. First, can publications in journals with a high impact factor or citations be considered an indicator of research quality without content expertise? Second, publication and citation orientations stimulate manipulative behavior. For instance, Don State Technical University (Russia), in the THE-2022 ranking, received a higher citation rate than the University of Cambridge (96.9 points against 96.2 points). A preliminary analysis revealed the presence of numerous university publications in “predatory” journals, a significant part of which has already been removed from Scopus. In addition, the citation rate was achieved through increased citation of conference papers (THE uses a normalized citation rate); in other words, the university just skillfully used the weaknesses of the ranking methodology.

The second subgroup of indicators is reputation surveys, which are used by THE and QS. Although they are devoid of the shortcomings of the previous approach, the problem of bias appears. The composition of the sample of experts (national, gender, and age) significantly affects the final result. Besides, when conducting surveys, there is no way to avoid the Matthew effect, i.e., with comparable research quality, experts are more likely to vote for a better-known university.

Finally, the third subgroup consists of “luxury” indicators, such as the number of Nobel and Fields winners among university staff. The use of such indicators is objective; however, their value for evaluating “average” universities is significantly limited.

Excellence initiatives in Russian higher education

The 5–100 or 5top100 project (“5-100 Russian Academic Excellence Project”, 2018 ) was a government policy initiative aimed at supporting the largest Russian universities. It was launched by the Russian Ministry of Education and Science in May 2013, in accordance with the Presidential Decree of the Russian Federation No. 599, “On measures to implement state policy in the sphere of education and science.” The primary objective of the project was to enhance the global competitive position of a select group of leading Russian universities in the field of educational services and research programs. Specifically, the project aimed to have at least five universities from its participants ranked within the top 100 in either the QS, THE, or ARWU rankings.

It is noteworthy that initially, the government had set the project goal as achieving a position within the top 100 institutional rankings. However, as the project progressed, subject rankings also became a criterion for determining the project’s success. The project was designed to span the period from 2013 to 2017, with a total funding of 80 billion rubles (approximately 1 billion euros). It should be mentioned that in 2013, this amount corresponded to 2.5 billion euros.

Initially, 15 universities were selected to participate in the project out of a total of 54 applications. In 2015, an additional six universities were included (“Six new Russian universities selected for the project 5-100”, 2015 ). These decisions were primarily based on the evaluation of the applicants’ strategic transformation programs, which were subsequently incorporated into the winners’ roadmaps. Participants were required to provide annual reports on their progress to the Council on Global Competitiveness Enhancement of Russian Universities among Global Leading Research and Education Centers. The assessment of each university was comprised of both quantitative progress toward their stated goals and expert evaluations. Since 2017, universities have been divided into three groups based on their final scores, with the funding allocated depending on which group they belong to (“Universities of the 5–100 Program were Divided into Three Groups,” 2017 ).

Recent years in Russia have seen a prominent focus on the results of the 5top100 project and the efforts to advance national universities in global university rankings. These topics have been extensively covered by prominent business media outlets. For instance, Forbes Education ( 2020 ) gathered opinions from experts regarding the program. It is not surprising that the majority of these opinions were positive, considering that most of the experts interviewed were participants in the 5top100 project or its successor, Priority 2030. However, it is crucial to note that the Vice-Rector of the private Russian Economic School, Zarema Kasabieva, pointed out some negative aspects of the project. One of the significant drawbacks highlighted by the expert was the absence of a ripple effect on the entire national higher education system.

The report released by the Accounts Chamber on the implementation of the 5top100 project sparked considerable discussion and debate (“Bulletin of the Accounts Chamber”, 2021 ). The authors of the report acknowledged the positive effects, such as an increase in the number of publications from universities participating in the project and their improved standing in global university rankings, particularly in specific fields. Auditor Dmitry Zaitsev, the author of the report, believes that the project prompted universities to radically reconsider their roles, functions, and objectives. However, the author also had to acknowledge that the primary goal of the project, originally formulated as the entry of five Russian universities into the top 100 institutional rankings, was not accomplished.

We have already mentioned that the 5top100 project was continued within the framework of the Priority-2030 program. This ongoing policy initiative is also aimed at promoting the development and advancement of national universities. One distinct aspect of this program is its rejection of global university rankings as the sole basis of evaluation. By moving away from a narrow reliance on global rankings, the program aims to foster a more holistic and context-specific approach to assessing the performance and progress of Russian universities (more information about this initiative Kochetkov, 2022 ). However, a significant proportion of evaluation in Priority-2030 still depends on the quantitative indicators also used in the rankings methodologies. First of all, this is the publication score based on the titles indexed in Scopus or Web of Science.

Data and methods

This paper is an integrative literature review. The methodology of the literature review begins with an examination of the key pieces of gray literature concerning responsible research evaluation, specifically in relation to global university rankings and their application in research evaluation. This step involves reviewing relevant reports, policy documents, and blog entries in order to gather essential insights and perspectives. The selection of literature is based on our expert judgment informed by the existing body of literature (e.g., Rushforth and Hammarfelt ( 2022 ).

Following the review of gray literature, the next step involves an extensive exploration of the Russian-language literature on university rankings. This is done to address any potential gaps in the existing international knowledge base and provide valuable information and perspectives for a wider readership. The objective is to gather relevant research articles in Russian that contribute to the understanding of university rankings.

To review the Russian literature on university rankings, we used the Russian Index of Scientific Citation (RISC) to analyze the largest database of publications in Russia. The search was conducted only by the document type “journal article” for the key phrases “rankings of universities” and “university rankings,” taking into account morphology. The query returned 199 results. In the next stage, we filtered out publications that did not belong to global rankings or described the case of a particular university as well as anonymous publications and translations into Russian. The final sample comprised 64 publications.

By employing this integrative approach, the literature review incorporates both international gray literature and Russian-language literature to ensure a comprehensive analysis and synthesis of existing knowledge on the topic of responsible research evaluation and global university rankings.

Global perspective

Now we propose to look at how university rankings, or rather their use in research evaluation, are considered in non-academic literature. In 2006, the second conference of the International Ranking Expert Group (IREG) established the Berlin principles on ranking of higher education institutions ( 2006 ), which set rules in four areas: purposes and goals of rankings; design and weighting of indicators; collection and processing of data; and presentation of ranking results. Unfortunately, this framework remained mostly on paper. Further, let’s look from the point of view of the basic documents in research evaluation. Table 1 presents the key results of this analysis.

Waltman et al. ( 2020 ) suggested ten principles for ranking universities responsibly. These principles are grouped into three areas: design, use, and interpretation of university rankings. INORMS Research Evaluation Working Group ( 2022 ) also proposed a set of principles for responsible ranking, grouped into four domains: good governance, transparency, measuring what matters, and rigor.

However, we must admit that the practice of development and use of university rankings is still far removed from the principles outlined in the documents discussed above. It is interesting to note that use and interpretation are outside the responsibility of ranking compilers. Therefore, the discussion of rankings and their use (especially in the context of research evaluation and policy initiatives) should involve not only ranking compilers and universities but also the general public and academics. It is extremely important to involve governments in this discussion because, in many countries, the higher education system is predominantly state-owned, and it is government bodies that form the assessment standards (this is especially true for East Asian countries and Russia).

An important development is the Agreement on Reforming Research Assessment (CoARA, 2022 ), inspired by the European Commission that, as of March 12, 2023, has been signed by 487 universities. The document clearly states that rankings should be avoided in research assessment. At the same time, the drafters of the agreement admit that rankings may be used for benchmarking purposes, but in such a case, the limitations of the methodology should be acknowledged.

Review of Russian literature on university rankings

Rankings, 5top100 projects, and world-class universities.

The mainstream Russian academic discourse considers global university rankings as a tool for assessing and improving the competitiveness of both universities and countries (Leonova et al. 2017 ). Global university rankings influence not only the development trajectory of individual universities but also the educational policies of entire countries (Puzatykh, 2019 ).

Moskovkin and Teng ( 2011 ) provided country-specific calculations of university publication activities based on the Taiwan ranking. Andreeva and Kisaeva ( 2011 ) considered global university rankings a tool for independent review and, at the same time, a means of measuring the quality of higher education. In addition, the authors emphasized the role of rankings in the development of competition between universities (countries).

Rodionov et al. ( 2013a , 2013b ) conducted a comparative analysis of the THE and QS rankings. The authors considered position in the global university rankings as a competitive advantage of the university:

Possibility of obtaining additional public funding (e.g.,—Project 5top100)

Academic reputation in the international environment, which attracts foreign students and academic staff

Reputation with employers

Rudakova, Polyanin, and Marchenkova also considered international rankings as a competitive tool not only for universities but also for national educational systems (Rudakova et al. 2015a , c , b ). The number of national universities and their positions in the rankings directly affect the volume of exports of educational services. Moreover, the promotion of national values through the expansion of the presence of national universities in global university rankings is a political tool of “soft power” (Irhin 2013a , b ). Ivanov and Ivanova ( 2015 ) introduced the concept of “charts (index) power,” which again is a significant component of “soft power.” As a result of the “ranking revolution,” rankings have turned from a convenient tool to an institution that dominates the academic community. The authors also drew attention to the English-language bias as a result of the use of Scopus and Web of Science by almost all ranking producers. Footnote 3

Tatochenko and Tatochenko ( 2013 ) analyzed the relationship between university rankings and tuition fees. Moskaleva ( 2014a , 2014b ) provided an overview of the main international university rankings as well as a number of recommendations for improving the position of the university based on publication indicators. Korzhavina et al. ( 2016 ) considered ARWU to be the most transparent and objective ranking reflecting university competitiveness. Moskovkin and Liu ( 2018 ) attempted to assess regional competitiveness through the positions of regional universities in the Webometrics ranking, as well as in the national rankings of Expert and Interfax.

Several authors have studied the problems of increasing the competitiveness of Russian universities and the national higher education system as a whole in the context of implementing the Project 5top100 excellence initiative (Arefiev, 2014 , 2015 ; Guzikova and Plotnikova, 2014 ; Kushneva et al. 2014 ). This is quite natural because the main goal of this initiative was the entry of five Russian universities into the top 100 global rankings. In other words, it is the rankings that are considered an indicator of competitiveness. In the literature, there is also the concept of a “world-class university,” which is also viewed through the prism of university rankings (Pankova, 2015 ). In general, such studies aim to identify common characteristics of universities in the top 30 (50, 100) of global university rankings (Nikolenko et al. 2014 ). Based on the 2008 THE ranking, Milkevich ( 2008 ) identified the key components of a world-class university:

The level of faculty

The best students

Individual approach to the education process

At the same time, Gazizova ( 2015 ), analyzing excellence initiatives in higher education around the world, questioned the relationship between rankings and academic excellence. Bogolib ( 2016 ) drew attention to the role of the state in creating world-class universities. Frank ( 2017 ) believed that global rankings should be used only by Project 5top100 participants, while other Russian universities should use national rankings. Yudina and Pavlova ( 2017 ) argued that global university rankings are a measure of national competitiveness.

Efimov and Lapteva ( 2017 ) expanded the concept of a “world-class university” by introducing the concept of a “frontier university”. The authors defined the concept as “a university that operates at the forefront of development processes: new areas of knowledge, new technologies; social development and human development” (P.7). The authors referred to universities such as the University of Berlin, Higher School of Economics, Singularity University, and some others. The authors also proposed a typology for university rankings:

Model 1. Ranking based on the ideal of an academic university with a focus on basic science (QS, ARWU, USNWR).

Model 2. Ranking based on the ideal of the university as a center of higher education (Russian ranking Interfax).

Model 3. Ranking based on the ideal of the university as a partner for business—a “workforce factory,” a technology and innovation development center (the authors of the article gave the example of Professional Ranking of World Universities, but we would definitely add the Forbes ranking here).

Model 4. Ranking based on the ideal of the university as a “social elevator” and center for socially significant projects (ranking of the Washington Monthly magazine).

Kupriyanova ( 2015 ), also Malishko and Yaremenko ( 2016 ) provided an overview of the methodology of the most common global university rankings. Vertakova et al. ( 2017 ) proposed conducting KPI monitoring of university performance based on indicators of global university rankings. Based on benchmarking, Antyukhova ( 2020 ) concluded that the QS ranking is closest to “reference” investment comparison procedures. The author argued that distortions in the ranking, regardless of the reasons for their occurrence, can be eliminated by increasing the significance not of the ranking itself but of the information posted by the university in open sources.

Bolsherotov ( 2020 ) provided an overview of three global university rankings (ARWU, THE, and QS) and analyzed case studies of successful universities. In particular, the author listed the California Institute of Technology and the role of investment by Chinese companies in promoting national universities in international rankings. A high indicator of the academic reputation of universities, on the one hand, is one of the basic indicators of the position of a university in the global market of educational services, but on the other hand, it acts as a kind of stigma for leading universities, reducing the need for innovation and improvement of the educational process (Antonova and Sushchenko, 2020 ). When forming or adjusting strategic development programs, universities should focus on achieving leading positions not only in institutional rankings but also in subject and industry rankings.

Sineva and Tryapitsyn ( 2021 ) conducted a statistical analysis of QS ranking results using correlation analysis, cluster analysis, and principal component analysis (PCA) methods. The authors showed that for different groups of universities (e.g., classical and technical universities, large and small), statistical patterns would differ significantly; the profile of the university should determine the choice of a particular strategy. Blazhevich et al. ( 2021 ) proposed an approach to describe the results of competitive interaction of universities included in any world university ranking based on the solution of population dynamics equations (Lotka-Volterra equations). The phase variables in these equations are the integral index values of university rankings. The author’s approach consists of reducing this system to a system of independent Verhulst equations that have analytical solutions in exponentials with respect to time and passing them to stationary solutions represented by the values of the phase variables at the moment of time tending to infinity. With this approach and a given growth factor Overall (Total) Score, it is possible to uniquely find symmetric coefficients of interuniversity competition for no more than three competing universities, the use of which leads to a system of equations whose stationary solution represents the known values of the integral ranking index for the selected three universities, and as initial values—integral indicators of the previous ranking. Zhang ( 2021 ) also proposed a method for predicting the position of a university in a ranking based on time-series analysis using the ARWU ranking as an example. Ufimtseva and Begicheva ( 2021 ) developed a predictor model for university rankings based on the system dynamics method, which was tested in the Anylogic simulation environment.

Neudachin ( 2017 ) conducted a correlation analysis of five different rankings and found several relationships between ratings. In particular, the QS and THE rankings strongly correlated with each other. The author also noted that the correlation between the top 100 of different rankings was lower than that when using the full sample. The team of authors of Belarusian State University conducted a correlation analysis of the Moscow International Ranking Three University Missions, RUR (Round University Ranking Footnote 4 ), QS, THE, and Webometrics (Gaisyonok et al. 2018 ). The results of the Three University Missions ranking moderately correlated with the results of the RUR ranking; the correlation with Webometrics was low. Correlations of QS with THE and Webometrics rankings were modest. The hypothesis regarding the systemic dependence of the average university position in the Webometrics ranking on the profile of the university was also positively tested (Gaisyonok et al. 2019 ).

The problem of university rankings is relevant not only for Russia but also for other countries in the post-Soviet space. Tsyuk ( 2016 ) conducted a comparative analysis between Ukrainian and global university rankings. Gaisyonok and Klishevich ( 2018 ) provided an overview of the methodology of global university rankings from the perspective of Belarusian universities’ participation.

Issues of promotion of national universities in global rankings

One of the main problems analyzed in Russian language scientific literature is the low position of Russian universities in global university rankings. Pugach and Zhukavskaya ( 2012 ) compared the THE and ARWU international rankings with the national ranking of Russian universities produced by the Interfax group of companies. The authors noted that the Russian ranking was focused more on the educational activities of the university, while international rankings focused on science Footnote 5 . Simultaneously, the number of R&D employees at Russian universities declined significantly in the first half of the 1990s. Despite the positive trend in recent years, Russia is still inferior to the Soviet Union in terms of the number of researchers. The authors attributed the low positions of Russian universities in the global university rankings to this. Similar conclusions were drawn by Shestak and Shestak ( 2013 ), who prioritized the anglicization of scientific and educational activities in Russian universities. Among the existing problems, the authors also noted the outdated institutional forms that had existed since Soviet times, as well as the discrepancy between global and Russian research agendas. A hypothesis was proposed (Rodionov et al. 2013b ) that the low positions of Russian universities are associated with a small number of articles in publications indexed in Web of Science, despite the fact that Russia is ahead of the United States and China in terms of the number of citations per 100,000 articles. Unfortunately, this approach does not allow us to analyze the underlying causes of the current situation.

Karpenko and Bershadskaya ( 2013 ) analyzed the dynamics of Russian universities in the Webometrics ranking (2007–2013). It should be noted that Russian universities are fairly well represented in this ranking (see also Kabakova ( 2015 ); Smyshlyaeva et al. ( 2016 ); Russia consistently ranks among the top 10 countries in terms of the number of universities. Saprykina ( 2018 ) highlighted that a university’s website had an indirect impact on the promotion of the university in global rankings through the formation of a positive image of the university.

An interesting hypothesis was put forward by Naidanov ( 2013 ), who linked the problems of Russian higher education with the orientation of national assessment systems towards processes, while global university rankings were focused on results. Zernov ( 2014 ) also analyzed the problems of developing the competitiveness of Russian higher education from the perspective of global university rankings. Tatochenko and Tatochenko ( 2014 ) linked the low positions of Russian universities in international rankings to a huge funding gap with leading countries. Islakaeva ( 2017 ) arrived at interesting conclusions by comparing the quantitative characteristics of Russian universities and various groups of universities in the QS ranking. The leading universities in the ranking have a significantly smaller number of students than Russian universities, including participants of the 5top100 project. At the same time, the proportion of graduate and undergraduate students at leading universities is much higher, and the total number of students per teacher is several times lower. Accordingly, instead of transforming existing universities, the author proposed creating universities in a “new format,” evenly distributing them throughout the country on the basis of agent-based modeling.

Ebzeeva and Smirnova ( 2022 ) analyzed the positions of Russian universities in global university rankings. The authors also compared the methodologies of the global and national rankings and highlighted the research orientation in the first case, while the latter tended to evaluate educational achievements. The article by Ebzeeva and Gishkaeva ( 2022 ) is devoted to the analysis of the methodology and positions of Russian universities in the ARWU ranking

Against the backdrop of the geopolitical situation and sanctions of Western countries, the position of developing its own ranking in Russia (and not only) is becoming increasingly widespread. Back in 2013, Bolsherotov ( 2013 ) pointed to the initially losing position of Russia in the “ranking game”. The author blamed global rankings for US bias in evaluation. Besides, the well-established tradition of publishing results in the national language, as well as the “removal” of the scientific sector from higher education, has an effect. The author sufficiently suggested not sending the data of Russian universities to international rankings and not taking them into account. In subsequent articles, Bolsherotov did not demonstrate such radical positions.

Lazar ( 2019 ) criticized the excessive bias towards quantitative performance indicators, the bureaucratization of science and higher education in general, and the use of rankings to assess the effectiveness (performance) of universities in particular. The article is more of an emotional journalistic than a scientific one. Nevertheless, the author made an important remark on the differences between the Russian and Western systems of science and higher education. In the West, science and higher education originally co-existed in universities and applied research developed through the active participation of businesses. In Russia, since the times of the USSR, there has been a “research triad”: the Academy of Sciences, industry design bureaus, and research institutes, while universities and industry institutes have been mainly engaged in training personnel with budget funding. Therefore, historically, both fundamental and applied research has largely moved “outside” universities. Over the past ten years, there have been several attempts to break this system and return science to universities (the reform of the Russian Academy of Sciences, the creation of consortiums of universities, the Academy of Sciences, and industry within the framework of the new Russian program of academic excellence “Priority 2030,” etc.), but a change in rooted institutional practice takes more time.

Global university rankings do not reflect the quality of education but the advantage of one educational system (Western) over all others (Pyatenko, 2019 ). Due to the limited number of bibliometric sources, there is an English-language bias in the assessment. Besides, the author noted that high scientific performance did not necessarily correspond to high education quality. Moreover, the rankings do not correlate with the indicators of demand for graduates by employers. We have not been able to find empirical evidence for the latter statement; we believe this is because if everyone (including employers) perceives a position in the rankings as an indicator of quality, it is not so important whether they really are. The well-known “Thomas theorem” is defined as follows: “if men define situations as real, they are real in their consequences” (Thomas, 1928 , p. 572).

Lutsenko ( 2015 ) proposed a methodology for ranking universities based on automated system-cognitive analysis Footnote 6 and Eidos software. Shiryaev ( 2015 ), on the contrary, proposed creating a national ranking that would repeat the global rankings in key aspects but would include a larger number of national universities. A similar idea was proposed by Tatochenko ( 2016 ), who proposed to strengthen the ranking positions of universities through the publication activity of graduate students. Khalafyan et al. ( 2016 ) proposed a methodology for ranking universities based on a multidimensional metric space. The similarity (difference) of universities is determined by the distances between them; the smaller the distance, the greater the similarity. Vorobyov ( 2016 ) argued that the use of global rankings as benchmarks was inconsistent with the country-specific goals of the national economy. Sandler et al. ( 2019 ) noted that the use of a system of indicators characteristic of the international model of the university does not correspond to the role of the university as a driver of regional economic development.

Burtseva ( 2018 ) formulated the prospects for the development of national rating systems (see also Nikiforova and Burtseva, 2019 ). Grishankov ( 2018 ) emphasized that the Three University Missions ranking eliminated bias towards English-speaking countries, which is inherent in global rankings. Eskindarov ( 2022 ) considered it expedient to develop a country’s own ranking The Three University Missions with more active involvement of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) and other CIS countries, which would meet the objectives of the development of the Union and the formation of decent human resources capable of realizing its potential in the interests of the development of their countries.

Discussion and conclusion

We have reviewed the major statements on responsible research evaluation with regard to global university rankings as well as the body of relevant Russian-language literature. The employed integrative methodology aims to fill the gap in the international knowledge base.

There is a consensus in basic documents on research assessment that global university rankings should not be used to evaluate research. Under the guise of apparent transparency and objectivity, there are a lot of shortcomings that negatively affect all stakeholders in the higher education ecosystem. Why are the rankings still actively used by universities and governments? We cannot answer this question right now, but we can put forward hypotheses that may be the subject of future research:

Neoliberal paradigm of higher education . With its spread, market relations have penetrated higher education, along with an increase in the number of students and public funds. Society and, more often, governments want to see a return on investment, while rankings create the illusion of a simple quantification of an organization’s performance. Unfortunately, the content (methodology) of the rankings and the impact of their indicators on public welfare are accepted uncritically.

Accountability movement . There is a global tendency for funders to require evaluations and report performance information to support their decisions about fund allocation. With an increase in the number of organizations assessed, there is a shortage of resources, and the assessment becomes more and more formal. From this point of view, the rankings appear very attractive as ready performance information.

Managerialism . Professional managers with a propensity for total control come to lead universities. In addition, managers often do not have sufficient scientific expertise; there is a need for simple metrics for evaluation and benchmarking. Rankings perfectly fit into the canvas.

It is interesting to note that all these phenomena existed already in the middle of the last century (Draper, 1964 ). Within the neoliberal paradigm of higher education, rankings are central to political excellence initiatives. Simultaneously, only the final position in the ranking plays a role; the methodology itself is most often accepted uncritically. Linking ranking position to funding raises the stakes and simultaneously increases the pressure on the academy (Gadd, 2019 ).

The vast majority of authors in Russian-language scientific literature consider university rankings in the discourse of competitiveness; accordingly, the university’s entry into one or another group of the global university ranking is taken as an indicator of competitiveness. High positions in the rankings allow the university to attract the best students and professors (including those from abroad) as well as receive additional funding through state excellence initiatives (e.g., Project 5top100). Positions in the rankings also increase the value of a diploma in the eyes of employers, although the latter thesis is questioned periodically. Based on this interpretation, rankings are not an indicator of competitiveness but are only marketing tools. The problem is not in the rankings themselves but in their misinterpretations and misapplications.

Also, in Russian-language literature, the concept of “world-class university” is often encountered, which is also viewed through the prism of the position of the university in the rankings. The concept of “frontier university” stands out from this series, but today it has not been sufficiently theoretically and empirically worked out. For example, Efimov and Lapteva ( 2017 ) argued that such universities operate at the forefront of new areas of knowledge, but this can be said of almost all leading universities in the world.

Among the reasons for the low positions of Russian universities in global university rankings, the authors in the literature that we reviewed identified the following:

A huge gap in funding between leading and Russian universities

Global rankings are more focused on science, while Russian universities are historically more focused on education

In Russia, the evaluation system focuses more on processes than on results

Low level of English language proficiency

The existence of obsolete institutional forms from Soviet times and the age composition of the professorship

We would certainly add here the fallen quality of school education.

Criticism of the rankings mainly comes from calls to replace global rankings with national rankings. We have found the point of Pyatenko ( 2019 ), who argues that global university rankings are not an indicator of quality; their task is to assert the superiority of the Western system of higher education. Besides, the performance of global university rankings may not be in line with national and regional development goals.

Heavy dependence on ranking indicators or quantitative measures, in general, raises a number of issues. First of all, applied sciences are context-dependent. Pressure to publish in Scopus/Web of Science titles leads to limited visibility and degradation of locally relevant research (on the issues of coverage, see, e.g., a recent study by Khanna et al. ( 2022 ). Despite the rosy reports of Russian universities moving up in the rankings and increasing their publications, it suddenly turned out that the country did not have enough technological competencies to produce car paint (Zlobin, 2023 ) or starter cultures for dairy products (Sukhorukova, 2023 ). From this point of view, the experience of participating in the 5top100 project of Ural Federal University, which simultaneously strengthened both global positions and ties with the regional industry, is interesting (Sandler et al. 2020 ). In parallel with the fulfillment of obligations to advance in the rankings under the 5top100 project, the university purposefully elaborated its contribution to the local economy through contract research, the creation of departments together with industrial partners, and participation in the projects of corporate universities (e.g.,, Ural Mining and Metallurgical Company). This approach is an example of a glocal development, but it is rather an exception.

The main problem concerns the validity of rankings in general. The majority of global university rankings, including THE, QS, ARWU, and U.S. News & World Report, are created by profit-driven organizations that generate income through the sale of additional data, consulting services, and subscription-based content to universities (Lim, 2021 ). Chirikov ( 2022 ) conducted an analysis of the ranking positions of 28 Russian universities that had engaged Quacquarelli Symonds for consulting services between 2016 and 2021. The findings revealed a peculiar rise in ranking positions that could not be justified by any observable changes in the universities’ characteristics as reported in national statistics (the author called this phenomenon “self-bias”). It should be noted here that almost all Russian universities have lost dozens of positions in the most recent edition of the QS ranking. Does it mean that Russian universities performed well before? Does it mean that there has been a significant deterioration in their activities recently? We believe that university rankings cannot give a valid answer to these questions.

The significance of rankings is solely based on the perception of significance by the key stakeholders. For instance, despite the current developments, the vice-rector of RUDN University (participant of the 5top100 and Priority-2030 projects), Yulia Ebzeeva, still believes that global university rankings measure the international prestige of the country (Ebzeeva and Smirnova, 2022 ). Moreover, the authors argue that the rankings are “based on the objective assessment by experts from different countries of the significant achievements of universities.”

Quite recently, the Universities of the Netherlands issued a report on the (negative) impact of global university rankings on higher education institutions (“Ranking the university: on the effects of rankings on the academic community and how to overcome them”, 2023 ). The rankings are hard to reject due to their marketing function. The report proposed a strategy to facilitate the desired cultural change, which entails the implementation of initiatives at three distinct levels. In the short term, universities should embark on individual initiatives. In the medium term, coordinated initiatives should be undertaken at the national level, such as collaborative efforts by all universities in the Netherlands. Lastly, in the long term, coordinated initiatives need to be established at the international level, for instance, at the European level. However, the change starts with each of us. Please, be aware that every time we say or post on social media something like “My university has advanced N positions in the ranking X”, this adds to the validity of rankings in the eyes of potential customers. Thus, every member of the academic community can start the movement towards rankings’ rejection with simple small steps.

Acknowledgements

The author wishes to express his deepest gratitude to his research advisors, Ludo Waltman and Ismael Rafols, whose comments and suggestions significantly improved this paper. This paper has been supported by the RUDN University Strategic Academic Leadership Program.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Centre for Science and Technology Studies, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands

Dmitry Kochetkov

Department of Probability Theory and Cybersecurity, RUDN University, Moscow, Russian Federation

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dmitry Kochetkov .

Ethics declarations

Competing interests.

The author is affiliated with the Center for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS) of Leiden University, which is the producer of the Leiden Ranking. The author is also a former employee of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation who implemented the Project 5top100 excellence initiative. No confidential information received by the author during the period of public service in the Ministry was used in this paper.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Additional information.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Kochetkov, D. Review of the Russian-language academic literature on university rankings and a global perspective. Humanit Soc Sci Commun 10 , 576 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02082-2

Download citation

Received : 25 March 2023

Accepted : 05 September 2023

Published : 15 September 2023

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02082-2

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Quick links

• Explore articles by subject
• Guide to authors
• Editorial policies

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

The Soft Power of the Russian Language

Related Papers

Russian Journal of Linguistics

Ekaterina Protassova

The purpose of this article is to help language teachers at all levels of education to understand in depth problems posed by linguistic superdiversity. Based on the study of scholarly literature, documents of educational bodies and the authors experience in language teaching in different countries, the article answers the question of how the teaching of world languages such as English and Russian is changing due to the recognition that their functions and status differ in various countries. We explore why, despite gradual changes in curricula, there is still pervasiveness of pedagogies attempting to achieve a perfect command of the studied languages, without considering students needs and language repertoires, the local sociolinguistic situation and labor market requirements. We focus on methods of teaching English and Russian, taking into account various aspects of language ideologies related to mono- and pluricentricity. To show the dependence of language teaching on the socio-cul...

Sociolinguistic Studies

Anastassia Zabrodskaja

The introduction to the special issue takes a brief look at the history of ethnolinguistic policies in the Russian Empire, the Soviet Union and post-Soviet space. It also covers relevant key terms for understanding linguistic processes taking place after the collapse of USSR. At the end it introduces the case studies included in this special issue.

e-ait.tlulib.ee

http://www.uab.ro/cercetare/ciel/jolie/index.html

Multilingual and multicultural societies are very often conflict-driven, and can be characterized by ethnolinguistic and cultural differentiations, social inequality etc. Discordance factor (D-factor) indicates dissonance, a lack of confidence, perceived inequity and animosity between two ethnic groups living together on one territory. The D-factor consists of four components: 1) the extent of legitimacy of the interethnic situation, 2) the extent of mutual lack of confidence, 3) the extent of mutual cooperativeness and 4) the extent of outgroup dehumanization. To measure these indicators, a questionnaire comprising 17 claims was created. In this paper I will discuss the findings of a pilot study carried out among Estonian and Russian-speaking students of Tallinn University. The purpose of the pilot study was to test whether statements adequately measure the factors that play a role in intergroup discordance such as legitimacy, confidence, cooperativeness and dehumanization. I will discuss how the D-factor is related to cross-cultural communication and how it could be reduced via majority and minority educational processes. I will argue that: 1) an understanding of multilingualism and multiculturalism ought to be developed that addresses the collective and individual needs of majority and minority students; 2) special courses in psychology and ethnosociology should be arranged to help majority and minority students to understand linguistic and cultural diversity.

Anna Verschik

Heritage language research and contact linguistics have developed as separate fields, yet both deal with aspects of L2 impact on the L1 to a considerable extent. Thus, one may ask whether they investigate the same phenomena using different terms or whether they concern only partly overlapping phenomena. In cases where there are very few speakers of a certain heritage language, it is extremely difficult to distinguish between incomplete L1 acquisition, attrition and contact-induced language change. This point will be illustrated by a case-study on conjunctions in the speech of a Yiddish-Lithuanian bilingual. The data display borrowing of conjunctions not only from the dominant language of the heritage language setting, but from other languages as well. Yet, no categorical differences are found between the borrowed conjunctions with regard to the language they originate from. The results can be best explained by observations within the study of language contact, especially in terms of Matras’ (1998) utterance modifiers, which tend to come from the pragmatically dominant language and not necessarily from the sociolinguistically dominant language of the heritage language setting.

Anastassia Zabrodskaja , Martin Ehala

This article presents the results of a large-scale quantitative study of the ethnolinguistic vitality of major ethnic groups in Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, and interprets the results for possible ethnic identity processes in the Baltic countries. Ethnolinguistic vitality is understood here as an ethnic group’s potential for collective action. Vitality processes are considered short-term (one to five years) and intragenerational. Ethnic identity is understood here broadly as a collective identity that is shared by a group that is functioning or able to function as a society. Ethnic identity processes (segregation, assimilation and consolidation) are long-term (minimum 20 years) processes. The analysis revealed significant differences in the vitality of ethnic groups in three countries. The vitalities of Estonians and Lithuanians are highest, while the Latvians’ vitality is slightly lower. As for the Russian minorities, the vitality is highest in Latvia and lowest in Lithuania. In Estonia, the vitality of the Russian-speaking population is slightly lower than in Latvia, particularly in north-east Estonia, and it is quite low in rural areas and small settlements. The Poles in Lithuania and Latgalians in Latvia have the lowest vitalities. The results suggest a continuation of segregation of Russians in Estonia and Poles in Lithuania. Due to low intergroup discordance between Lithuanians and Russians, the Russian community in Lithuania is likely to assimilate, as are the Latgalians in Latvia. The Latvian-Russian situation resembles an unstable equilibrium: the vitality profiles of Latvians and Russians could lead either towards consolidation or separation.

Language Assessment Quarterly

yamina remichi

Language. Text. Society

Russian is one of the ‘migrant’ languages spoken in Estonia and it has intensive contacts with Estonian, the majority language. The study is concerned with conversational functions of Russian-Estonian code-switching in Kohtla-Järve, which is a specific region in terms of population structure: Estonians from 20.9 % and Russians 79.1 %. It analyses the data collected between 2000 and 2006 at different occasions: the Estonian language summer camp of Kohtla-Järve Third Secondary School, the summer camps of Kohtla-Järve Pärna School. The analysis is based on the framework of conversational approach. Many instances of Russian-Estonian code-switching reveal that the grammatical properties of switches are often dictated by pragmatic goals. Seven conversational functions were found in the data in connection with intrasentential/extrasentential switches. Language play and expressive function are encountered most frequently. The language of the quotations is usually Estonian when referring to an interaction with an Estonian-speaking person. Code switches as reiterations are used for clarifying, emphasizing or amplifying a message. The nature of short interactions restricts the possibility of detecting switchings related to the change in participant constellation or topic, but some examples do appear in the data. Quite infrequently, switching may serve to mark side-comments.

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

RELATED PAPERS

… -European perspectives II: selected papers from …

Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development

Martin Ehala , Anastassia Zabrodskaja

Arizona Working papers in SLA & Teaching

The Russian Language Outside the Nation

International Journal of Bilingual Education and …

Language Ideologies in Transition Multilingualism in Russia and Finland (Peter Lang)

Arto Mustajoki

Anastassia Zabrodskaja , Anna Verschik

International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism,

Samara AltLinguo E-Journal

Journal of the European Second Language Association

Natasha Ringblom , Anastassia Zabrodskaja

Multilingual Practices in the Baltic Countries

Journal of Multilingual and …

Aneta Pavlenko

Proceedings of the Third International Scientific and Practical conference "ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF MASS CONSCIOUSNESS STUDIES", Penza, Russia, 24-25 March 2017

International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism

Philologia Estonica Tallinnensis

Martin Ehala

Josep Soler

Emilia Pawlusz

… , töötlemine ja kasutamine. Tallinn: Tallinna Ülikooli …

Natalya Kosmarskaya

Claudine Chamoreau

Zoya G Proshina

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024

• Boston University Libraries

Russian Language & Literature

Citing your sources.

• Dictionaries
• Grammar / Russian Usage
• Language History / Linguistics
• Russian Literature
• Tips for Finding Books and Articles

MLA (Modern Language Association) Style

Apa (american psychological association) style, chicago style.

• Additional Resources
• Russian Literature @ BU

Purdue OWL (Online Writing Lab)

The Online Writing Lab (OWL) at Purdue University houses writing resources and instructional material, and we provide these as a free service of the Writing Lab at Purdue. Students, members of the community, and users worldwide will find information to assist with many writing projects.

Proper citation is an essential aspect of scholarship. Citing properly allows your reader or audience to locate the materials you have used. Most importantly, citations give credit to the authors of quoted or consulted information. Failure to acknowledge sources of information properly may constitute plagiarism.  For an explicit definition of plagiarism, see the  Boston University Academic Conduct Code .

For detailed instructions on how to cite sources in your paper or project, please consult a style manual listed below. See our Citing Sources guide for additional style manuals.

• MLA Formatting and Style Guide at Purdue OWL

• APA Formatting and Style Guide at Purdue OWL

• Chicago Style guide at Purdue OWL

• << Previous: Tips for Finding Books and Articles
• Next: Additional Resources >>
• Last Updated: Jul 15, 2024 8:55 AM
• URL: https://library.bu.edu/russian

• < Previous

Home > Honors College > Honors Theses > 3122

Honors Theses

Framing identity: russian media in the baltics as a mechanism of soft power.

Jackson McArthur Follow

Date of Award

Spring 5-11-2024

Document Type

Undergraduate Thesis

Croft Institute for International Studies

First Advisor

Joshua First

Second Advisor

Ana Velitchkova

Third Advisor

Relational format.

Dissertation/Thesis

Societal tensions surrounding language, national identity, collective memory, citizenship, and integration exist between the titular Baltic population and Russian speakers living in the Baltic states (Simons, 2015). The Russian government has tried to exploit these tensions via non-violent yet subversive political and cultural influence—or “soft power”—with limited success, particularly through Russian-language media (Kudors, 2015). While many scholars have focused on the reception of Russia’s soft power among the Baltic Russian-speaking population, which has been primarily ineffective at advancing Russia’s political goals (Cheskin, 2015; Kallas, 2016; Coolican, 2021), few have analyzed Russian-language media as a mechanism of Russian soft power in the Baltics. My research aims to examine Russian-language media as a vehicle of Russian soft power and seeks to assess how Moscow’s discourse frames the issues of the Baltic states’ 2004 ascension to NATO and the EU, the 2007 Bronze Night in Estonia, and Latvia’s 2018 educational reforms phasing out instruction in the Russian language. I argue that Russian media as a mechanism of Russian soft power attempts to construct a separate cultural, political, and linguistic identity among Russian speakers in the Baltic states that is separate from their nationalizing states but not necessarily loyal to Russia. This media analysis sheds new light on Russian soft power in the Baltic states and will allow scholars and policymakers to evaluate Russian soft power not only in terms of its receptiveness among its target population but also with regard to its strategy, themes and structure.

Recommended Citation

McArthur, Jackson, "Framing Identity: Russian Media in the Baltics as a Mechanism of Soft Power" (2024). Honors Theses . 3122. https://egrove.olemiss.edu/hon_thesis/3122

Creative Commons License

Since July 12, 2024

Included in

Eastern European Studies Commons , Soviet and Post-Soviet Studies Commons

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately, you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.

• Collections
• Disciplines

Advanced Search

• Notify me via email or RSS

Author Corner

• Submit Thesis

Additional Information

• Request an Accessible Copy

Home | About | FAQ | My Account | Accessibility Statement

Privacy Copyright

• Photo Gallery
• Privacy Policy
• Terms of Use
• ChannelOne TV

• Infographics
• Listen To CitiFM
• Watch ChannelOne TV

Mahama launches Russian language translation of his book in Moscow

Former President and flagbearer of the National Democratic Congress (NDC), John Dramani Mahama has launched the Russian language translation of his memoir, ‘My First Coup D’etat and Other Stories from the Lost Decades of Africa’ at the Russian Academy of Sciences in Moscow.

Speaking about the book published in July 2012, Mr Mahama said it is a memoir chronicling his upbringing as a young African boy as well as the history of Ghana and Africa during times of political and economic instability between the 1970s and 1990s. He mentioned that the book has also been translated into Portuguese.

Mr Mahama highlighted a chapter of the book that he believed would interest the Russian audience the most, recalling his time as a student at the Institute of Social Sciences in Moscow during the era of Gorbachev and the Perestroika— the ‘restructuring’ of Russian society and economy.

He shared fond memories of his philosophy lecturer, Mr. Gudoshnik, who was initially unsure about teaching the orthodox philosophy of socialism as it was in the textbook provided. Mr. Gudoshnik, he noted, decided to have a more interactive approach to teaching, saying, “We’re going to learn from each other. I’ll tell you what’s in the textbook, and you tell me what you know and what you think about it.”

Mr. Mahama expressed gratitude to the Russian Academy of Sciences, Comrade Dmitriy Savelyev, a member of the Russian State Duma, the Russia-Ghana Parliamentary Friendship Association and his old friends and comrades who helped in translating the book and organising the launch event.

He also acknowledged his friend and editor of the book, Nana Ama Danquah, who encouraged him to share his stories in a book for the benefit of society.

The former Ghanaian president encouraged the audience to read the book to satisfy their curiosity and to discover the African story told in an easy-to-read and journalistic form.

Mr. Mahama expressed hope that the book would find a place in Russian academia for those interested in learning more about Africa.

Explore the world of impactful news with CitiNewsroom on WhatsApp!

Click on the link to join the Citi Newsroom channel for curated, meaningful stories tailored just for YOU :  https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VaCYzPRAYlUPudDDe53x

‘So-called independent committee illegal, unconstitutional’ – CPP

Fostering global collaboration to address cybersecurity challenges [article], related posts.

Election 2024: Our economy is in tatters, nothing left to debate – Bawah Mogtari

Election 2024: Mahama not seeking support from Russian govt – Campaign Team

Mahama running from debate because he’s ’empty’ – Bawumia

Election 2024: Vote for change; reject ‘corrupt, arrogant’ NPP govt – Mahama

Mahama will never win 2024 elections, he lacks ideas – Akufo-Addo

I’ve been the best vice president since independence – Bawumia

TOP STORIES

Bagbin adjourns sitting after only 24 mps showed up in parliament, upper west: wa residents threaten to ban politicians over recent murders, almost 2m youth are not in education, employment, or training – gss.

CitiNewsroom.com is Ghana's leading news website that delivers high quality innovative, alternative news that challenges the status quo.

Download App

© 2024 All Rights Reserved Citi Newsroom .

Privacy Overview

Towards Manipulator Task-Oriented Programming: Automating Behavior-Tree Configuration

Task-oriented programming is a way of programming manipulators in terms of high-level tasks instead of explicit motions. It has been a long-standing vision in robotics since its early days. Despite its potential, several challenges have hindered its full realization. This thesis identifies three major challenges, particularly in task specification and the planning-to-execution transition: 1) The absence of natural language integration in system input. 2) The dilemma of continuously developing non-uniform and domain-specific primitive-task libraries. 3) The requirement for much human intervention.

To overcome these difficulties, this thesis introduces a novel approach that integrates natural language inputs, eliminates the need on fixed primitive-task libraries, and minimizes human intervention. It adopts the behavior tree, a modular and user-friendly form, as the task representation and advances its usage in task specification and planning-to-execution transition. The thesis is structured into two parts – Task Specification and Planning-to-Execution Transition.

Task specification explores the use of large language models to generate a behavior tree from an end-user's input. A Phase-Step prompt is designed to enable the automatic behavior-tree generation from end-user's abstract task descriptions in natural languages. With the powerful generalizability of large language models, it breaks the dilemma that stays with fixed primitive-task libraries in task generation. A full-process case study demonstrated the proposed approach. An ablation study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of the Phase-Step prompts. Task specification also proposes behavior-tree embeddings to facilitate the retrieval-augmented generation of behavior trees. The integration of behavior-tree embeddings not only eliminates the need for manual prompt configuration but also provides a way to incorporate external domain knowledge into the generation process. Three types of evaluations were performed to assess the performance of the behavior-tree embedding method.

Planning-to-execution transition explores how to transit primitive tasks from task specification into manipulator executions. Two types of primitive tasks are considered separately: point-to-point movement tasks and object-interaction tasks. For point-to-point movement tasks, a behavior-tree reward is proposed to enable reinforcement learning over low-level movement while following high-level running order of the behavior tree. End-users only need to specify rewards on the primitive tasks over the behavior tree, and the rest of the process will be handled automatically. A 2D space movement simulation was provided to justify the approach. For object-interaction tasks, the planning-to-execution transition uses a large-language-model-based generation approach. This approach takes natural-language-described primitive tasks as input and directly produces task-frame-formalism set-points. Combined with hybrid position/force control systems, a transition process from primitive tasks directly into joint-level execution can be realized. Evaluations over a set of 30 primitive tasks were conducted.

Overall, this thesis proposes an approach that advances the behavior-tree towards automated task specification and planning-to-execution transitions. It opens up new possibilities for building better task-oriented manipulator programming systems.

Degree Type

• Doctor of Philosophy
• Electrical and Computer Engineering

Campus location

• West Lafayette

Advisor/Supervisor/Committee Chair

Additional committee member 2, additional committee member 3, additional committee member 4, usage metrics.

• Intelligent robotics

The Constitutional Court of Latvia ruled against a challenge to a law that converted Russian-language schools to Latvian. It stated that the decision to make the school language Latvian was valid under the country’s legal framework and international commitments.

Latvia, a former member of the Soviet Union, gained its independence and officially became a country in 1991. While it has a sizable Russian-speaking population, the majority of the population speaks Latvian. Article 4 of the Constitution of Latvia also recognizes Latvian as the official language of the nation. Additionally, Article 114 gives the right to ethnic minorities to preserve their language.

The Education Law of 1998 and the General Education Law of 2000 required all public schools to use Latvian as the primary language of teaching, while some private institutions choose to teach in Russian. In 2018, the Amendment to General Education Law Act was passed, which made teaching in Latvian compulsory in all educational institutions, including private institutions.

This created controversy among the Russian speaking population, and opponents of the reform filed a petition in 2023 against the act, alleging it to be violation of the right to obtain general education in a minority language. The original court upheld the act and the Constitutional Court was hearing an appeal.

A 2020 report by the Venice Commission, an advisory body of the Council of Europe, examined these amendments. It concluded that while the laws were in compliance with international regulations, the government of Latvia should consider a framework more inclusive of minorities.

The ruling comes amid as Latvia has passed other laws that impact the Russian-speaking community, including regulations which require Russian residents to pass a language exam. Latvia also closed border crossing points with Russia in October 2023, for what it cited as security reasons.

Vienna riots kill 89+

On July 15, 1927, a riot erupted in Vienna over the acquittal of three conservative paramilitary members accused of firing on a group of socialists, killing war veteran Matthias Csmarits and 8-year-old Josef Grössing. The riots resulted in the burning of Vienna's Palace of Justice, which is the seat of the country's Supreme Court, as well at least 89 deaths. Learn more from the city of Vienna.

Federal Housing Act passed

On July 15, 1949, Congress passed the Federal Housing Act to fund slum clearance and low-rent public housing projects. Learn more about the history of federal housing policy.

Murders of Daniel Pearl sentenced to death in Pakistan

On July 15, 2002, a court in Pakistan sentenced Ahmed Omar Saeed Sheikh and three accomplices to death for the murder of Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl. Read selected stories by Daniel Pearl from the The Wall Street Journal.

UN rights chief calls for end to war on Ukraine following latest airstrikes

Facebook Twitter Print Email

The UN human rights chief Volker Türk expressed his outrage on Tuesday at Russia’s latest airstrikes on Ukrainian cities which killed dozens and hit the country’s biggest children’s hospital in the capital Kyiv.

Mr. Türk said these “relentless” attacks were deepening the humanitarian crisis in the country, tearing apart infrastructure, and creating a host of socioeconomic challenges.  

Between March and May, 436 civilians were killed and 1,760 injured, High Commissioner Türk said.

“These high civilian casualties are largely the result of the ground offensive and aerial attacks, including with powerful air-dropped bombs, that took place in Kharkiv region,” the rights chief said.

“ Such attacks must stop immediately .”

An attack on energy

The head of OHCHR said Russian forces had been targeting power-generating and distribution systems which has limited Ukraine’s electricity capacity.

Millions of civilians experience power cuts, often for hours at a time, decreasing access to water, internet and public transportation, he said. This was impacting jobs, tax revenues and weakening social protection.  

“ But the worst is possibly yet to come ,” Mr. Türk said, “as energy companies and the Ukrainian authorities caution that repeated strikes have reduced the ability to make the necessary repairs to heat homes during winter.”

Russian citizenship  

Mr. Türk said OHCHR has documented a rise in pressure to obtain Russian passports in the occupied territories of Ukraine.

Without Russian citizenship, many older people are reportedly experiencing difficulty accessing healthcare. For parents, they are having challenges sending their children to school without them obtaining a Russian passport.

This, the rights chief said, violates international humanitarian law.

Call for a ceasefire

The High Commissioner for Human Rights said the escalation of war in Ukraine “ cannot become the new normal .”

Mr. Türk calls on the Russian Federation to immediately end its use of force against Ukraine and to withdraw troops from occupied territories in the country.

He also calls for the federation to end the use of explosive weapons with wide area effects in populated areas.

“ War is the worst enemy of human rights ”, he said. “It has to be shunned and peace must be found in line with the UN Charter and international law.”

“ That is the most fervent wish of Ukrainians. ”

Sports review: Euro 2024 and Wimbledon finals

Leonid Sandler gate crashed the English zone at Spartak stadium Source: Supplied

Get the SBS Audio app

Other ways to listen, sports columnist leonid sandler talks about important sports news in australia and the world. today's issue is about the finals of euro 2024 and the wimbledon tournament., latest podcast episodes.

SBS Russian Program — 15.07.2024

Assassination attempt on Donald Trump: what is known about the shooter and the victim and how leaders reacted

SBS News in Russian — 15.07.2024

Rangers from Yalata Aboriginal Community using drones to care for local land

Recommended for you.

Sports review. Before the Euro 2024 final

SBS Russian Program — 13.07.2024

Russian News