hypothesis is a prediction

• Bipolar Disorder
• Therapy Center
• When To See a Therapist
• Types of Therapy
• Best Online Therapy
• Best Couples Therapy
• Best Family Therapy
• Managing Stress
• Sleep and Dreaming
• Understanding Emotions
• Self-Improvement
• Healthy Relationships
• Student Resources
• Personality Types
• Guided Meditations
• Verywell Mind Insights
• 2024 Verywell Mind 25
• Mental Health in the Classroom
• Editorial Process
• Meet Our Review Board
• Crisis Support

How to Write a Great Hypothesis

Hypothesis Definition, Format, Examples, and Tips

Kendra Cherry, MS, is a psychosocial rehabilitation specialist, psychology educator, and author of the "Everything Psychology Book."

Amy Morin, LCSW, is a psychotherapist and international bestselling author. Her books, including "13 Things Mentally Strong People Don't Do," have been translated into more than 40 languages. Her TEDx talk,  "The Secret of Becoming Mentally Strong," is one of the most viewed talks of all time.

Verywell / Alex Dos Diaz

• The Scientific Method

Hypothesis Format

Falsifiability of a hypothesis.

• Operationalization

Hypothesis Types

Hypotheses examples.

• Collecting Data

A hypothesis is a tentative statement about the relationship between two or more variables. It is a specific, testable prediction about what you expect to happen in a study. It is a preliminary answer to your question that helps guide the research process.

Consider a study designed to examine the relationship between sleep deprivation and test performance. The hypothesis might be: "This study is designed to assess the hypothesis that sleep-deprived people will perform worse on a test than individuals who are not sleep-deprived."

At a Glance

A hypothesis is crucial to scientific research because it offers a clear direction for what the researchers are looking to find. This allows them to design experiments to test their predictions and add to our scientific knowledge about the world. This article explores how a hypothesis is used in psychology research, how to write a good hypothesis, and the different types of hypotheses you might use.

The Hypothesis in the Scientific Method

In the scientific method , whether it involves research in psychology, biology, or some other area, a hypothesis represents what the researchers think will happen in an experiment. The scientific method involves the following steps:

• Forming a question
• Performing background research
• Creating a hypothesis
• Designing an experiment
• Collecting data
• Analyzing the results
• Drawing conclusions
• Communicating the results

The hypothesis is a prediction, but it involves more than a guess. Most of the time, the hypothesis begins with a question which is then explored through background research. At this point, researchers then begin to develop a testable hypothesis.

Unless you are creating an exploratory study, your hypothesis should always explain what you  expect  to happen.

In a study exploring the effects of a particular drug, the hypothesis might be that researchers expect the drug to have some type of effect on the symptoms of a specific illness. In psychology, the hypothesis might focus on how a certain aspect of the environment might influence a particular behavior.

Remember, a hypothesis does not have to be correct. While the hypothesis predicts what the researchers expect to see, the goal of the research is to determine whether this guess is right or wrong. When conducting an experiment, researchers might explore numerous factors to determine which ones might contribute to the ultimate outcome.

In many cases, researchers may find that the results of an experiment  do not  support the original hypothesis. When writing up these results, the researchers might suggest other options that should be explored in future studies.

In many cases, researchers might draw a hypothesis from a specific theory or build on previous research. For example, prior research has shown that stress can impact the immune system. So a researcher might hypothesize: "People with high-stress levels will be more likely to contract a common cold after being exposed to the virus than people who have low-stress levels."

In other instances, researchers might look at commonly held beliefs or folk wisdom. "Birds of a feather flock together" is one example of folk adage that a psychologist might try to investigate. The researcher might pose a specific hypothesis that "People tend to select romantic partners who are similar to them in interests and educational level."

Elements of a Good Hypothesis

So how do you write a good hypothesis? When trying to come up with a hypothesis for your research or experiments, ask yourself the following questions:

• Is your hypothesis based on your research on a topic?
• Can your hypothesis be tested?
• Does your hypothesis include independent and dependent variables?

Before you come up with a specific hypothesis, spend some time doing background research. Once you have completed a literature review, start thinking about potential questions you still have. Pay attention to the discussion section in the  journal articles you read . Many authors will suggest questions that still need to be explored.

How to Formulate a Good Hypothesis

To form a hypothesis, you should take these steps:

• Collect as many observations about a topic or problem as you can.
• Evaluate these observations and look for possible causes of the problem.
• Create a list of possible explanations that you might want to explore.
• After you have developed some possible hypotheses, think of ways that you could confirm or disprove each hypothesis through experimentation. This is known as falsifiability.

In the scientific method ,  falsifiability is an important part of any valid hypothesis. In order to test a claim scientifically, it must be possible that the claim could be proven false.

Students sometimes confuse the idea of falsifiability with the idea that it means that something is false, which is not the case. What falsifiability means is that  if  something was false, then it is possible to demonstrate that it is false.

One of the hallmarks of pseudoscience is that it makes claims that cannot be refuted or proven false.

The Importance of Operational Definitions

A variable is a factor or element that can be changed and manipulated in ways that are observable and measurable. However, the researcher must also define how the variable will be manipulated and measured in the study.

Operational definitions are specific definitions for all relevant factors in a study. This process helps make vague or ambiguous concepts detailed and measurable.

For example, a researcher might operationally define the variable " test anxiety " as the results of a self-report measure of anxiety experienced during an exam. A "study habits" variable might be defined by the amount of studying that actually occurs as measured by time.

These precise descriptions are important because many things can be measured in various ways. Clearly defining these variables and how they are measured helps ensure that other researchers can replicate your results.

Replicability

One of the basic principles of any type of scientific research is that the results must be replicable.

Replication means repeating an experiment in the same way to produce the same results. By clearly detailing the specifics of how the variables were measured and manipulated, other researchers can better understand the results and repeat the study if needed.

Some variables are more difficult than others to define. For example, how would you operationally define a variable such as aggression ? For obvious ethical reasons, researchers cannot create a situation in which a person behaves aggressively toward others.

To measure this variable, the researcher must devise a measurement that assesses aggressive behavior without harming others. The researcher might utilize a simulated task to measure aggressiveness in this situation.

Hypothesis Checklist

• Does your hypothesis focus on something that you can actually test?
• Does your hypothesis include both an independent and dependent variable?
• Can you manipulate the variables?
• Can your hypothesis be tested without violating ethical standards?

The hypothesis you use will depend on what you are investigating and hoping to find. Some of the main types of hypotheses that you might use include:

• Simple hypothesis : This type of hypothesis suggests there is a relationship between one independent variable and one dependent variable.
• Complex hypothesis : This type suggests a relationship between three or more variables, such as two independent and dependent variables.
• Null hypothesis : This hypothesis suggests no relationship exists between two or more variables.
• Alternative hypothesis : This hypothesis states the opposite of the null hypothesis.
• Statistical hypothesis : This hypothesis uses statistical analysis to evaluate a representative population sample and then generalizes the findings to the larger group.
• Logical hypothesis : This hypothesis assumes a relationship between variables without collecting data or evidence.

A hypothesis often follows a basic format of "If {this happens} then {this will happen}." One way to structure your hypothesis is to describe what will happen to the  dependent variable  if you change the  independent variable .

The basic format might be: "If {these changes are made to a certain independent variable}, then we will observe {a change in a specific dependent variable}."

A few examples of simple hypotheses:

• "Students who eat breakfast will perform better on a math exam than students who do not eat breakfast."
• "Students who experience test anxiety before an English exam will get lower scores than students who do not experience test anxiety."​
• "Motorists who talk on the phone while driving will be more likely to make errors on a driving course than those who do not talk on the phone."
• "Children who receive a new reading intervention will have higher reading scores than students who do not receive the intervention."

Examples of a complex hypothesis include:

• "People with high-sugar diets and sedentary activity levels are more likely to develop depression."
• "Younger people who are regularly exposed to green, outdoor areas have better subjective well-being than older adults who have limited exposure to green spaces."

Examples of a null hypothesis include:

• "There is no difference in anxiety levels between people who take St. John's wort supplements and those who do not."
• "There is no difference in scores on a memory recall task between children and adults."
• "There is no difference in aggression levels between children who play first-person shooter games and those who do not."

Examples of an alternative hypothesis:

• "People who take St. John's wort supplements will have less anxiety than those who do not."
• "Adults will perform better on a memory task than children."
• "Children who play first-person shooter games will show higher levels of aggression than children who do not." 

Collecting Data on Your Hypothesis

Once a researcher has formed a testable hypothesis, the next step is to select a research design and start collecting data. The research method depends largely on exactly what they are studying. There are two basic types of research methods: descriptive research and experimental research.

Descriptive Research Methods

Descriptive research such as  case studies ,  naturalistic observations , and surveys are often used when  conducting an experiment is difficult or impossible. These methods are best used to describe different aspects of a behavior or psychological phenomenon.

Once a researcher has collected data using descriptive methods, a  correlational study  can examine how the variables are related. This research method might be used to investigate a hypothesis that is difficult to test experimentally.

Experimental Research Methods

Experimental methods  are used to demonstrate causal relationships between variables. In an experiment, the researcher systematically manipulates a variable of interest (known as the independent variable) and measures the effect on another variable (known as the dependent variable).

Unlike correlational studies, which can only be used to determine if there is a relationship between two variables, experimental methods can be used to determine the actual nature of the relationship—whether changes in one variable actually  cause  another to change.

The hypothesis is a critical part of any scientific exploration. It represents what researchers expect to find in a study or experiment. In situations where the hypothesis is unsupported by the research, the research still has value. Such research helps us better understand how different aspects of the natural world relate to one another. It also helps us develop new hypotheses that can then be tested in the future.

Thompson WH, Skau S. On the scope of scientific hypotheses .  R Soc Open Sci . 2023;10(8):230607. doi:10.1098/rsos.230607

Taran S, Adhikari NKJ, Fan E. Falsifiability in medicine: what clinicians can learn from Karl Popper [published correction appears in Intensive Care Med. 2021 Jun 17;:].  Intensive Care Med . 2021;47(9):1054-1056. doi:10.1007/s00134-021-06432-z

Eyler AA. Research Methods for Public Health . 1st ed. Springer Publishing Company; 2020. doi:10.1891/9780826182067.0004

Nosek BA, Errington TM. What is replication ?  PLoS Biol . 2020;18(3):e3000691. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691

Aggarwal R, Ranganathan P. Study designs: Part 2 - Descriptive studies .  Perspect Clin Res . 2019;10(1):34-36. doi:10.4103/picr.PICR_154_18

Nevid J. Psychology: Concepts and Applications. Wadworth, 2013.

By Kendra Cherry, MSEd Kendra Cherry, MS, is a psychosocial rehabilitation specialist, psychology educator, and author of the "Everything Psychology Book."

Hypothesis vs. Prediction

What's the difference.

Hypothesis and prediction are both important components of the scientific method, but they serve different purposes. A hypothesis is a proposed explanation or statement that can be tested through experimentation or observation. It is based on prior knowledge, observations, or theories and is used to guide scientific research. On the other hand, a prediction is a specific statement about what will happen in a particular situation or experiment. It is often derived from a hypothesis and serves as a testable outcome that can be confirmed or refuted through data analysis. While a hypothesis provides a broader framework for scientific inquiry, a prediction is a more specific and measurable expectation of the results.

Further Detail

Introduction.

When it comes to scientific research and inquiry, two important concepts that often come into play are hypothesis and prediction. Both of these terms are used to make educated guesses or assumptions about the outcome of an experiment or study. While they share some similarities, they also have distinct attributes that set them apart. In this article, we will explore the characteristics of hypothesis and prediction, highlighting their differences and similarities.

A hypothesis is a proposed explanation or statement that can be tested through experimentation or observation. It is typically formulated based on existing knowledge, observations, or theories. A hypothesis is often used as a starting point for scientific research, as it provides a framework for investigation and helps guide the research process.

One of the key attributes of a hypothesis is that it is testable. This means that it can be subjected to empirical evidence and observations to determine its validity. A hypothesis should be specific and measurable, allowing researchers to design experiments or gather data to either support or refute the hypothesis.

Another important aspect of a hypothesis is that it is falsifiable. This means that it is possible to prove the hypothesis wrong through experimentation or observation. Falsifiability is crucial in scientific research, as it ensures that hypotheses can be objectively tested and evaluated.

Hypotheses can be classified into two main types: null hypotheses and alternative hypotheses. A null hypothesis states that there is no significant relationship or difference between variables, while an alternative hypothesis proposes the existence of a relationship or difference. These two types of hypotheses are often used in statistical analysis to draw conclusions from data.

In summary, a hypothesis is a testable and falsifiable statement that serves as a starting point for scientific research. It is specific, measurable, and can be either a null or alternative hypothesis.

While a hypothesis is a proposed explanation or statement, a prediction is a specific outcome or result that is anticipated based on existing knowledge or theories. Predictions are often made before conducting an experiment or study and serve as a way to anticipate the expected outcome.

Unlike a hypothesis, a prediction is not necessarily testable or falsifiable on its own. Instead, it is used to guide the research process and provide a basis for comparison with the actual results obtained from the experiment or study. Predictions can be based on previous research, theoretical models, or logical reasoning.

One of the key attributes of a prediction is that it is specific and precise. It should clearly state the expected outcome or result, leaving little room for ambiguity. This allows researchers to compare the prediction with the actual results and evaluate the accuracy of their anticipated outcome.

Predictions can also be used to generate hypotheses. By making a prediction and comparing it with the actual results, researchers can identify discrepancies or unexpected findings. These observations can then be used to formulate new hypotheses and guide further research.

In summary, a prediction is a specific anticipated outcome or result that is not necessarily testable or falsifiable on its own. It serves as a basis for comparison with the actual results obtained from an experiment or study and can be used to generate new hypotheses.

Similarities

While hypotheses and predictions have distinct attributes, they also share some similarities in the context of scientific research. Both hypotheses and predictions are based on existing knowledge, observations, or theories. They are both used to make educated guesses or assumptions about the outcome of an experiment or study.

Furthermore, both hypotheses and predictions play a crucial role in the scientific method. They provide a framework for research, guiding the design of experiments, data collection, and analysis. Both hypotheses and predictions are subject to evaluation and revision based on empirical evidence and observations.

Additionally, both hypotheses and predictions can be used to generate new knowledge and advance scientific understanding. By testing hypotheses and comparing predictions with actual results, researchers can gain insights into the relationships between variables, uncover new phenomena, or challenge existing theories.

Overall, while hypotheses and predictions have their own unique attributes, they are both integral components of scientific research and inquiry.

In conclusion, hypotheses and predictions are important concepts in scientific research. While a hypothesis is a testable and falsifiable statement that serves as a starting point for investigation, a prediction is a specific anticipated outcome or result that guides the research process. Hypotheses are specific, measurable, and can be either null or alternative, while predictions are precise and serve as a basis for comparison with actual results.

Despite their differences, hypotheses and predictions share similarities in terms of their reliance on existing knowledge, their role in the scientific method, and their potential to generate new knowledge. Both hypotheses and predictions contribute to the advancement of scientific understanding and play a crucial role in the research process.

By understanding the attributes of hypotheses and predictions, researchers can effectively formulate research questions, design experiments, and analyze data. These concepts are fundamental to the scientific method and are essential for the progress of scientific research and inquiry.

Comparisons may contain inaccurate information about people, places, or facts. Please report any issues.

• Games & Quizzes
• History & Society
• Science & Tech
• Biographies
• Animals & Nature
• Geography & Travel
• Arts & Culture
• On This Day
• One Good Fact
• New Articles
• Lifestyles & Social Issues
• Philosophy & Religion
• Politics, Law & Government
• World History
• Health & Medicine
• Browse Biographies
• Birds, Reptiles & Other Vertebrates
• Bugs, Mollusks & Other Invertebrates
• Environment
• Fossils & Geologic Time
• Entertainment & Pop Culture
• Sports & Recreation
• Visual Arts
• Demystified
• Image Galleries
• Infographics
• Top Questions
• Britannica Kids
• Saving Earth
• Space Next 50
• Student Center

• When did science begin?
• Where was science invented?

scientific hypothesis

Our editors will review what you’ve submitted and determine whether to revise the article.

• National Center for Biotechnology Information - PubMed Central - On the scope of scientific hypotheses
• LiveScience - What is a scientific hypothesis?
• The Royal Society - Open Science - On the scope of scientific hypotheses

scientific hypothesis , an idea that proposes a tentative explanation about a phenomenon or a narrow set of phenomena observed in the natural world. The two primary features of a scientific hypothesis are falsifiability and testability, which are reflected in an “If…then” statement summarizing the idea and in the ability to be supported or refuted through observation and experimentation. The notion of the scientific hypothesis as both falsifiable and testable was advanced in the mid-20th century by Austrian-born British philosopher Karl Popper .

The formulation and testing of a hypothesis is part of the scientific method , the approach scientists use when attempting to understand and test ideas about natural phenomena. The generation of a hypothesis frequently is described as a creative process and is based on existing scientific knowledge, intuition , or experience. Therefore, although scientific hypotheses commonly are described as educated guesses, they actually are more informed than a guess. In addition, scientists generally strive to develop simple hypotheses, since these are easier to test relative to hypotheses that involve many different variables and potential outcomes. Such complex hypotheses may be developed as scientific models ( see scientific modeling ).

Depending on the results of scientific evaluation, a hypothesis typically is either rejected as false or accepted as true. However, because a hypothesis inherently is falsifiable, even hypotheses supported by scientific evidence and accepted as true are susceptible to rejection later, when new evidence has become available. In some instances, rather than rejecting a hypothesis because it has been falsified by new evidence, scientists simply adapt the existing idea to accommodate the new information. In this sense a hypothesis is never incorrect but only incomplete.

The investigation of scientific hypotheses is an important component in the development of scientific theory . Hence, hypotheses differ fundamentally from theories; whereas the former is a specific tentative explanation and serves as the main tool by which scientists gather data, the latter is a broad general explanation that incorporates data from many different scientific investigations undertaken to explore hypotheses.

Countless hypotheses have been developed and tested throughout the history of science . Several examples include the idea that living organisms develop from nonliving matter, which formed the basis of spontaneous generation , a hypothesis that ultimately was disproved (first in 1668, with the experiments of Italian physician Francesco Redi , and later in 1859, with the experiments of French chemist and microbiologist Louis Pasteur ); the concept proposed in the late 19th century that microorganisms cause certain diseases (now known as germ theory ); and the notion that oceanic crust forms along submarine mountain zones and spreads laterally away from them ( seafloor spreading hypothesis ).

• Privacy Policy

Home » What is a Hypothesis – Types, Examples and Writing Guide

What is a Hypothesis – Types, Examples and Writing Guide

Table of Contents

Definition:

Hypothesis is an educated guess or proposed explanation for a phenomenon, based on some initial observations or data. It is a tentative statement that can be tested and potentially proven or disproven through further investigation and experimentation.

Hypothesis is often used in scientific research to guide the design of experiments and the collection and analysis of data. It is an essential element of the scientific method, as it allows researchers to make predictions about the outcome of their experiments and to test those predictions to determine their accuracy.

Types of Hypothesis

Types of Hypothesis are as follows:

Research Hypothesis

A research hypothesis is a statement that predicts a relationship between variables. It is usually formulated as a specific statement that can be tested through research, and it is often used in scientific research to guide the design of experiments.

Null Hypothesis

The null hypothesis is a statement that assumes there is no significant difference or relationship between variables. It is often used as a starting point for testing the research hypothesis, and if the results of the study reject the null hypothesis, it suggests that there is a significant difference or relationship between variables.

Alternative Hypothesis

An alternative hypothesis is a statement that assumes there is a significant difference or relationship between variables. It is often used as an alternative to the null hypothesis and is tested against the null hypothesis to determine which statement is more accurate.

Directional Hypothesis

A directional hypothesis is a statement that predicts the direction of the relationship between variables. For example, a researcher might predict that increasing the amount of exercise will result in a decrease in body weight.

Non-directional Hypothesis

A non-directional hypothesis is a statement that predicts the relationship between variables but does not specify the direction. For example, a researcher might predict that there is a relationship between the amount of exercise and body weight, but they do not specify whether increasing or decreasing exercise will affect body weight.

Statistical Hypothesis

A statistical hypothesis is a statement that assumes a particular statistical model or distribution for the data. It is often used in statistical analysis to test the significance of a particular result.

Composite Hypothesis

A composite hypothesis is a statement that assumes more than one condition or outcome. It can be divided into several sub-hypotheses, each of which represents a different possible outcome.

Empirical Hypothesis

An empirical hypothesis is a statement that is based on observed phenomena or data. It is often used in scientific research to develop theories or models that explain the observed phenomena.

Simple Hypothesis

A simple hypothesis is a statement that assumes only one outcome or condition. It is often used in scientific research to test a single variable or factor.

Complex Hypothesis

A complex hypothesis is a statement that assumes multiple outcomes or conditions. It is often used in scientific research to test the effects of multiple variables or factors on a particular outcome.

Applications of Hypothesis

Hypotheses are used in various fields to guide research and make predictions about the outcomes of experiments or observations. Here are some examples of how hypotheses are applied in different fields:

• Science : In scientific research, hypotheses are used to test the validity of theories and models that explain natural phenomena. For example, a hypothesis might be formulated to test the effects of a particular variable on a natural system, such as the effects of climate change on an ecosystem.
• Medicine : In medical research, hypotheses are used to test the effectiveness of treatments and therapies for specific conditions. For example, a hypothesis might be formulated to test the effects of a new drug on a particular disease.
• Psychology : In psychology, hypotheses are used to test theories and models of human behavior and cognition. For example, a hypothesis might be formulated to test the effects of a particular stimulus on the brain or behavior.
• Sociology : In sociology, hypotheses are used to test theories and models of social phenomena, such as the effects of social structures or institutions on human behavior. For example, a hypothesis might be formulated to test the effects of income inequality on crime rates.
• Business : In business research, hypotheses are used to test the validity of theories and models that explain business phenomena, such as consumer behavior or market trends. For example, a hypothesis might be formulated to test the effects of a new marketing campaign on consumer buying behavior.
• Engineering : In engineering, hypotheses are used to test the effectiveness of new technologies or designs. For example, a hypothesis might be formulated to test the efficiency of a new solar panel design.

How to write a Hypothesis

Here are the steps to follow when writing a hypothesis:

Identify the Research Question

The first step is to identify the research question that you want to answer through your study. This question should be clear, specific, and focused. It should be something that can be investigated empirically and that has some relevance or significance in the field.

Conduct a Literature Review

Before writing your hypothesis, it’s essential to conduct a thorough literature review to understand what is already known about the topic. This will help you to identify the research gap and formulate a hypothesis that builds on existing knowledge.

Determine the Variables

The next step is to identify the variables involved in the research question. A variable is any characteristic or factor that can vary or change. There are two types of variables: independent and dependent. The independent variable is the one that is manipulated or changed by the researcher, while the dependent variable is the one that is measured or observed as a result of the independent variable.

Formulate the Hypothesis

Based on the research question and the variables involved, you can now formulate your hypothesis. A hypothesis should be a clear and concise statement that predicts the relationship between the variables. It should be testable through empirical research and based on existing theory or evidence.

Write the Null Hypothesis

The null hypothesis is the opposite of the alternative hypothesis, which is the hypothesis that you are testing. The null hypothesis states that there is no significant difference or relationship between the variables. It is important to write the null hypothesis because it allows you to compare your results with what would be expected by chance.

Refine the Hypothesis

After formulating the hypothesis, it’s important to refine it and make it more precise. This may involve clarifying the variables, specifying the direction of the relationship, or making the hypothesis more testable.

Examples of Hypothesis

Here are a few examples of hypotheses in different fields:

• Psychology : “Increased exposure to violent video games leads to increased aggressive behavior in adolescents.”
• Biology : “Higher levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere will lead to increased plant growth.”
• Sociology : “Individuals who grow up in households with higher socioeconomic status will have higher levels of education and income as adults.”
• Education : “Implementing a new teaching method will result in higher student achievement scores.”
• Marketing : “Customers who receive a personalized email will be more likely to make a purchase than those who receive a generic email.”
• Physics : “An increase in temperature will cause an increase in the volume of a gas, assuming all other variables remain constant.”
• Medicine : “Consuming a diet high in saturated fats will increase the risk of developing heart disease.”

Purpose of Hypothesis

The purpose of a hypothesis is to provide a testable explanation for an observed phenomenon or a prediction of a future outcome based on existing knowledge or theories. A hypothesis is an essential part of the scientific method and helps to guide the research process by providing a clear focus for investigation. It enables scientists to design experiments or studies to gather evidence and data that can support or refute the proposed explanation or prediction.

The formulation of a hypothesis is based on existing knowledge, observations, and theories, and it should be specific, testable, and falsifiable. A specific hypothesis helps to define the research question, which is important in the research process as it guides the selection of an appropriate research design and methodology. Testability of the hypothesis means that it can be proven or disproven through empirical data collection and analysis. Falsifiability means that the hypothesis should be formulated in such a way that it can be proven wrong if it is incorrect.

In addition to guiding the research process, the testing of hypotheses can lead to new discoveries and advancements in scientific knowledge. When a hypothesis is supported by the data, it can be used to develop new theories or models to explain the observed phenomenon. When a hypothesis is not supported by the data, it can help to refine existing theories or prompt the development of new hypotheses to explain the phenomenon.

When to use Hypothesis

Here are some common situations in which hypotheses are used:

• In scientific research , hypotheses are used to guide the design of experiments and to help researchers make predictions about the outcomes of those experiments.
• In social science research , hypotheses are used to test theories about human behavior, social relationships, and other phenomena.
• I n business , hypotheses can be used to guide decisions about marketing, product development, and other areas. For example, a hypothesis might be that a new product will sell well in a particular market, and this hypothesis can be tested through market research.

Characteristics of Hypothesis

Here are some common characteristics of a hypothesis:

• Testable : A hypothesis must be able to be tested through observation or experimentation. This means that it must be possible to collect data that will either support or refute the hypothesis.
• Falsifiable : A hypothesis must be able to be proven false if it is not supported by the data. If a hypothesis cannot be falsified, then it is not a scientific hypothesis.
• Clear and concise : A hypothesis should be stated in a clear and concise manner so that it can be easily understood and tested.
• Based on existing knowledge : A hypothesis should be based on existing knowledge and research in the field. It should not be based on personal beliefs or opinions.
• Specific : A hypothesis should be specific in terms of the variables being tested and the predicted outcome. This will help to ensure that the research is focused and well-designed.
• Tentative: A hypothesis is a tentative statement or assumption that requires further testing and evidence to be confirmed or refuted. It is not a final conclusion or assertion.
• Relevant : A hypothesis should be relevant to the research question or problem being studied. It should address a gap in knowledge or provide a new perspective on the issue.

Advantages of Hypothesis

Hypotheses have several advantages in scientific research and experimentation:

• Guides research: A hypothesis provides a clear and specific direction for research. It helps to focus the research question, select appropriate methods and variables, and interpret the results.
• Predictive powe r: A hypothesis makes predictions about the outcome of research, which can be tested through experimentation. This allows researchers to evaluate the validity of the hypothesis and make new discoveries.
• Facilitates communication: A hypothesis provides a common language and framework for scientists to communicate with one another about their research. This helps to facilitate the exchange of ideas and promotes collaboration.
• Efficient use of resources: A hypothesis helps researchers to use their time, resources, and funding efficiently by directing them towards specific research questions and methods that are most likely to yield results.
• Provides a basis for further research: A hypothesis that is supported by data provides a basis for further research and exploration. It can lead to new hypotheses, theories, and discoveries.
• Increases objectivity: A hypothesis can help to increase objectivity in research by providing a clear and specific framework for testing and interpreting results. This can reduce bias and increase the reliability of research findings.

Limitations of Hypothesis

Some Limitations of the Hypothesis are as follows:

• Limited to observable phenomena: Hypotheses are limited to observable phenomena and cannot account for unobservable or intangible factors. This means that some research questions may not be amenable to hypothesis testing.
• May be inaccurate or incomplete: Hypotheses are based on existing knowledge and research, which may be incomplete or inaccurate. This can lead to flawed hypotheses and erroneous conclusions.
• May be biased: Hypotheses may be biased by the researcher’s own beliefs, values, or assumptions. This can lead to selective interpretation of data and a lack of objectivity in research.
• Cannot prove causation: A hypothesis can only show a correlation between variables, but it cannot prove causation. This requires further experimentation and analysis.
• Limited to specific contexts: Hypotheses are limited to specific contexts and may not be generalizable to other situations or populations. This means that results may not be applicable in other contexts or may require further testing.
• May be affected by chance : Hypotheses may be affected by chance or random variation, which can obscure or distort the true relationship between variables.

About the author

Muhammad Hassan

Researcher, Academic Writer, Web developer

You may also like

Dissertation Methodology – Structure, Example...

Critical Analysis – Types, Examples and Writing...

Background of The Study – Examples and Writing...

Assignment – Types, Examples and Writing Guide

Thesis Format – Templates and Samples

Research Design – Types, Methods and Examples

• Key Differences

Know the Differences & Comparisons

Difference Between Hypothesis and Prediction

Due to insufficient knowledge, many misconstrue hypothesis for prediction, which is wrong, as these two are entirely different. Prediction is forecasting of future events, which is sometimes based on evidence or sometimes, on a person’s instinct or gut feeling. So take a glance at the article presented below, which elaborates the difference between hypothesis and prediction.

Content: Hypothesis Vs Prediction

Comparison chart.

Definition of Hypothesis

In simple terms, hypothesis means a sheer assumption which can be approved or disapproved. For the purpose of research, the hypothesis is defined as a predictive statement, which can be tested and verified using the scientific method. By testing the hypothesis, the researcher can make probability statements on the population parameter. The objective of the hypothesis is to find the solution to a given problem.

A hypothesis is a mere proposition which is put to the test to ascertain its validity. It states the relationship between an independent variable to some dependent variable. The characteristics of the hypothesis are described as under:

• It should be clear and precise.
• It should be stated simply.
• It must be specific.
• It should correlate variables.
• It should be consistent with most known facts.
• It should be capable of being tested.
• It must explain, what it claims to explain.

Definition of Prediction

A prediction is described as a statement which forecasts a future event, which may or may not be based on knowledge and experience, i.e. it can be a pure guess based on the instinct of a person. It is termed as an informed guess, when the prediction comes out from a person having ample subject knowledge and uses accurate data and logical reasoning, to make it.

Regression analysis is one of the statistical technique, which is used for making the prediction.

In many multinational corporations, futurists (predictors) are paid a good amount for making prediction relating to the possible events, opportunities, threats or risks. And to do so, the futurists, study all past and current events, to forecast future occurrences. Further, it has a great role to play in statistics also, to draw inferences about a population parameter.

Key Differences Between Hypothesis and Prediction

The difference between hypothesis and prediction can be drawn clearly on the following grounds:

• A propounded explanation for an observable occurrence, established on the basis of established facts, as an introduction to the further study, is known as the hypothesis. A statement, which tells or estimates something that will occur in future is known as the prediction.
• The hypothesis is nothing but a tentative supposition which can be tested by scientific methods. On the contrary, the prediction is a sort of declaration made in advance on what is expected to happen next, in the sequence of events.
• While the hypothesis is an intelligent guess, the prediction is a wild guess.
• A hypothesis is always supported by facts and evidence. As against this, predictions are based on knowledge and experience of the person making it, but that too not always.
• Hypothesis always have an explanation or reason, whereas prediction does not have any explanation.
• Hypothesis formulation takes a long time. Conversely, making predictions about a future happening does not take much time.
• Hypothesis defines a phenomenon, which may be a future or a past event. Unlike, prediction, which always anticipates about happening or non-happening of a certain event in future.
• The hypothesis states the relationship between independent variable and the dependent variable. On the other hand, prediction does not state any relationship between variables.

To sum up, the prediction is merely a conjecture to discern future, while a hypothesis is a proposition put forward for the explanation. The former, can be made by any person, no matter he/she has knowledge in the particular field. On the flip side, the hypothesis is made by the researcher to discover the answer to a certain question. Further, the hypothesis has to pass to various test, to become a theory.

You Might Also Like:

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Hypotheses Versus Predictions

Hypotheses and predictions are not the same thing..

Posted January 12, 2018

Blogs are not typically places where professors post views about arcane matters. But blogs have the advantage of providing places to convey quick messages that may be of interest to selected parties. I've written this blog to point students and others to a spot where a useful distinction is made that, as far as I know, hasn't been made before. The distinction concerns two words that are used interchangeably though they shouldn't be. The words are hypothesis (or hypotheses) and prediction (or predictions).

It's not uncommon to see these words swapped for each other willy-nilly, as in, "We sought to test the hypothesis that the two groups in our study would remember the same number of words," or "We sought to test the prediction that the two groups in our study would remember the same number of words." Indifference to the contrast in meaning between "hypothesis" and "prediction" is unfortunate, in my view, because "hypothesis" and "prediction" (or "hypotheses" and "predictions") mean very different things. A student proposing an experiment, or an already-graduated researcher doing the same, will have more gravitas if s/he states a hypothesis from which a prediction follows than if s/he proclaims a prediction from thin air.

Consider the prediction that the time for two balls to drop from the Tower Pisa will be the same if the two balls have different mass. This is the famous prediction tested (or allegedly tested) by Galileo. This experiment — one of the first in the history of science — was designed to test two contrasting predictions. One was that the time for the two balls to drop would be the same. The other was that the time for the heavier ball to drop would be shorter. (The third possibility, that the lighter ball would drop more quickly, was logically possible but not taken seriously.) The importance of the predictions came from the hypotheses on which they were based. Those hypotheses couldn't have been more different. One stemmed from Aristotle and had an entire system of assumptions about the world's basic elements, including the idea that motion requires a driving force, with the force being greater for a heavier object than a lighter one, in which case the heavier object would land first. The other hypothesis came from an entirely different conception which made no such assumptions, as crystallized (later) by Newton. It led to the prediction of equivalent drop times. Dropping two balls and seeing which, if either, landed first was a more important experiment if it was motivated by different hypotheses than if it was motivated by two different off-the-cuff predictions. Predictions can be ticked off by a monkey at a typewriter, so to speak. Anyone can list possible outcomes. That's not good (interesting) science.

Let me say this, then, to students or colleagues reading this (some of whom might be people to whom I give the URL for this blog): Be cognizant of the distinction between "hypotheses" and "predictions." Hypotheses are claims or educated guesses about the world or the part of it you are studying. Predictions are derived from hypotheses and define opportunities for seeing whether expected consequences of hypotheses are observed. Critically, if a prediction is confirmed — if the data agree with the prediction — you can say that the data are consistent with the prediction and, from that point onward you can also say that the data are consistent with the hypothesis that spawned the prediction. You can't say that the data prove the hypothesis, however. The reason is that any of an infinite number of other hypotheses might have caused the outcome you obtained. If you say that a given data pattern proves that such-and-such hypothesis is correct, you will be shot down, and rightly so, for any given data pattern can be explained by an infinite number of possible hypotheses. It's fine to say that the data you have are consistent with a hypothesis, and it's fine for you to say that a hypothesis is (or appears to be) wrong because the data you got are inconsistent with it. The latter outcome is the culmination of the hypothetico-deductive method, where you can say that a hypothesis is, or seems to be, incorrect if you have data that violates it, but you can never say that a hypothesis is right because you have data consistent with it; some other hypothesis might actually correspond to the true explanation of what you found. By creating hypotheses that lead to different predictions, you can see which prediction is not supported, and insofar as you can make progress by rejecting hypotheses, you can depersonalize your science by developing hypotheses that are worth disproving. The worth of a hypothesis will be judged by how resistant it is to attempts at disconfirmation over many years by many investigators using many methods.

Some final comments.... First, hypotheses don't predict; people do. You can say that a prediction arose from a hypothesis, but you can't say, or shouldn't say, that a hypothesis predicts something.

Second, beware of the admonition that hypotheses are weak if they predict no differences. Newtonian mechanics predicts no difference in the landing times of heavy and light objects dropped from the same height at the same time. The fact that Newtonian mechanics predicts no difference hardly means that Newtonian mechanics is lightweight. Instead, the prediction of no difference in landing times demands creation of extremely sensitive experiments. Anyone can get no difference with sloppy experiments. By contrast, getting no difference when a sophisticated hypothesis predicts none and when one has gone to great lengths to detect even the tiniest possible difference ... now that's good science.

Third and finally, according to the hypothesis that a blog about hypotheses versus predictions will prove informative, the prediction that follows is that those who read and heed this blog will exhibit less confusion about which term to use when. More important, they will exhibit greater gravitas and deeper thoughtfulness as they generate their hypotheses and subsequent predictions. I hope this blog will prove useful. Its utility will be judged by how long it takes to disconfirm the prediction I have just advanced.

David A. Rosenbaum, Ph.D. , is a cognitive psychologist and a Distinguished Professor of Psychology at the University of California, Riverside.

• Find Counselling
• Find a Support Group
• Find Online Therapy
• United Kingdom
• Asperger's
• Bipolar Disorder
• Chronic Pain
• Eating Disorders
• Passive Aggression
• Personality
• Goal Setting
• Positive Psychology
• Stopping Smoking
• Low Sexual Desire
• Relationships
• Child Development
• Self Tests NEW
• Therapy Center
• Diagnosis Dictionary
• Types of Therapy

Sticking up for yourself is no easy task. But there are concrete skills you can use to hone your assertiveness and advocate for yourself.

• Emotional Intelligence
• Gaslighting
• Affective Forecasting
• Neuroscience

What is a scientific hypothesis?

It's the initial building block in the scientific method.

Hypothesis basics

What makes a hypothesis testable.

• Types of hypotheses
• Hypothesis versus theory

Additional resources

Bibliography.

A scientific hypothesis is a tentative, testable explanation for a phenomenon in the natural world. It's the initial building block in the scientific method . Many describe it as an "educated guess" based on prior knowledge and observation. While this is true, a hypothesis is more informed than a guess. While an "educated guess" suggests a random prediction based on a person's expertise, developing a hypothesis requires active observation and background research. 

The basic idea of a hypothesis is that there is no predetermined outcome. For a solution to be termed a scientific hypothesis, it has to be an idea that can be supported or refuted through carefully crafted experimentation or observation. This concept, called falsifiability and testability, was advanced in the mid-20th century by Austrian-British philosopher Karl Popper in his famous book "The Logic of Scientific Discovery" (Routledge, 1959).

A key function of a hypothesis is to derive predictions about the results of future experiments and then perform those experiments to see whether they support the predictions.

A hypothesis is usually written in the form of an if-then statement, which gives a possibility (if) and explains what may happen because of the possibility (then). The statement could also include "may," according to California State University, Bakersfield .

Here are some examples of hypothesis statements:

• If garlic repels fleas, then a dog that is given garlic every day will not get fleas.
• If sugar causes cavities, then people who eat a lot of candy may be more prone to cavities.
• If ultraviolet light can damage the eyes, then maybe this light can cause blindness.

A useful hypothesis should be testable and falsifiable. That means that it should be possible to prove it wrong. A theory that can't be proved wrong is nonscientific, according to Karl Popper's 1963 book " Conjectures and Refutations ."

An example of an untestable statement is, "Dogs are better than cats." That's because the definition of "better" is vague and subjective. However, an untestable statement can be reworded to make it testable. For example, the previous statement could be changed to this: "Owning a dog is associated with higher levels of physical fitness than owning a cat." With this statement, the researcher can take measures of physical fitness from dog and cat owners and compare the two.

Types of scientific hypotheses

In an experiment, researchers generally state their hypotheses in two ways. The null hypothesis predicts that there will be no relationship between the variables tested, or no difference between the experimental groups. The alternative hypothesis predicts the opposite: that there will be a difference between the experimental groups. This is usually the hypothesis scientists are most interested in, according to the University of Miami .

For example, a null hypothesis might state, "There will be no difference in the rate of muscle growth between people who take a protein supplement and people who don't." The alternative hypothesis would state, "There will be a difference in the rate of muscle growth between people who take a protein supplement and people who don't."

If the results of the experiment show a relationship between the variables, then the null hypothesis has been rejected in favor of the alternative hypothesis, according to the book " Research Methods in Psychology " (​​BCcampus, 2015). 

There are other ways to describe an alternative hypothesis. The alternative hypothesis above does not specify a direction of the effect, only that there will be a difference between the two groups. That type of prediction is called a two-tailed hypothesis. If a hypothesis specifies a certain direction — for example, that people who take a protein supplement will gain more muscle than people who don't — it is called a one-tailed hypothesis, according to William M. K. Trochim , a professor of Policy Analysis and Management at Cornell University.

Sometimes, errors take place during an experiment. These errors can happen in one of two ways. A type I error is when the null hypothesis is rejected when it is true. This is also known as a false positive. A type II error occurs when the null hypothesis is not rejected when it is false. This is also known as a false negative, according to the University of California, Berkeley . 

A hypothesis can be rejected or modified, but it can never be proved correct 100% of the time. For example, a scientist can form a hypothesis stating that if a certain type of tomato has a gene for red pigment, that type of tomato will be red. During research, the scientist then finds that each tomato of this type is red. Though the findings confirm the hypothesis, there may be a tomato of that type somewhere in the world that isn't red. Thus, the hypothesis is true, but it may not be true 100% of the time.

Scientific theory vs. scientific hypothesis

The best hypotheses are simple. They deal with a relatively narrow set of phenomena. But theories are broader; they generally combine multiple hypotheses into a general explanation for a wide range of phenomena, according to the University of California, Berkeley . For example, a hypothesis might state, "If animals adapt to suit their environments, then birds that live on islands with lots of seeds to eat will have differently shaped beaks than birds that live on islands with lots of insects to eat." After testing many hypotheses like these, Charles Darwin formulated an overarching theory: the theory of evolution by natural selection.

"Theories are the ways that we make sense of what we observe in the natural world," Tanner said. "Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts." 

• Read more about writing a hypothesis, from the American Medical Writers Association.
• Find out why a hypothesis isn't always necessary in science, from The American Biology Teacher.
• Learn about null and alternative hypotheses, from Prof. Essa on YouTube .

Encyclopedia Britannica. Scientific Hypothesis. Jan. 13, 2022. https://www.britannica.com/science/scientific-hypothesis

Karl Popper, "The Logic of Scientific Discovery," Routledge, 1959.

California State University, Bakersfield, "Formatting a testable hypothesis." https://www.csub.edu/~ddodenhoff/Bio100/Bio100sp04/formattingahypothesis.htm  

Karl Popper, "Conjectures and Refutations," Routledge, 1963.

Price, P., Jhangiani, R., & Chiang, I., "Research Methods of Psychology — 2nd Canadian Edition," BCcampus, 2015.‌

University of Miami, "The Scientific Method" http://www.bio.miami.edu/dana/161/evolution/161app1_scimethod.pdf  

William M.K. Trochim, "Research Methods Knowledge Base," https://conjointly.com/kb/hypotheses-explained/  

University of California, Berkeley, "Multiple Hypothesis Testing and False Discovery Rate" https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/~hhuang/STAT141/Lecture-FDR.pdf  

University of California, Berkeley, "Science at multiple levels" https://undsci.berkeley.edu/article/0_0_0/howscienceworks_19

Sign up for the Live Science daily newsletter now

Get the world’s most fascinating discoveries delivered straight to your inbox.

LA may be spared 'horrifying' fate of the 'Big One' from San Andreas, simulation suggests

Norway's Dragon's Eye: The fantastical 'pothole' that emerged from ice 16,000 years ago

People are falling in love with AI. Should we worry?

Most Popular

• 2 James Webb Space Telescope spies strange shapes above Jupiter's Great Red Spot
• 3 What defines a species? Inside the fierce debate that's rocking biology to its core
• 4 Newly discovered asteroid larger than the Great Pyramid of Giza will zoom between Earth and the moon on Saturday
• 5 China opens Chang'e 6 return capsule containing samples from moon's far side
• 2 Tasselled wobbegong: The master of disguise that can eat a shark almost as big as itself
• 3 Newly discovered asteroid larger than the Great Pyramid of Giza will zoom between Earth and the moon on Saturday
• 4 2,000 years ago, a bridge in Switzerland collapsed on top of Celtic sacrifice victims, new study suggests
• 5 Self-healing 'living skin' can make robots more humanlike — and it looks just as creepy as you'd expect

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.

• Knowledge Base

Hypothesis Testing | A Step-by-Step Guide with Easy Examples

Published on November 8, 2019 by Rebecca Bevans . Revised on June 22, 2023.

Hypothesis testing is a formal procedure for investigating our ideas about the world using statistics . It is most often used by scientists to test specific predictions, called hypotheses, that arise from theories.

There are 5 main steps in hypothesis testing:

• State your research hypothesis as a null hypothesis and alternate hypothesis (H o ) and (H a  or H 1 ).
• Collect data in a way designed to test the hypothesis.
• Perform an appropriate statistical test .
• Decide whether to reject or fail to reject your null hypothesis.
• Present the findings in your results and discussion section.

Though the specific details might vary, the procedure you will use when testing a hypothesis will always follow some version of these steps.

Table of contents

Step 1: state your null and alternate hypothesis, step 2: collect data, step 3: perform a statistical test, step 4: decide whether to reject or fail to reject your null hypothesis, step 5: present your findings, other interesting articles, frequently asked questions about hypothesis testing.

After developing your initial research hypothesis (the prediction that you want to investigate), it is important to restate it as a null (H o ) and alternate (H a ) hypothesis so that you can test it mathematically.

The alternate hypothesis is usually your initial hypothesis that predicts a relationship between variables. The null hypothesis is a prediction of no relationship between the variables you are interested in.

• H 0 : Men are, on average, not taller than women. H a : Men are, on average, taller than women.

Receive feedback on language, structure, and formatting

Professional editors proofread and edit your paper by focusing on:

• Academic style
• Vague sentences
• Style consistency

See an example

For a statistical test to be valid , it is important to perform sampling and collect data in a way that is designed to test your hypothesis. If your data are not representative, then you cannot make statistical inferences about the population you are interested in.

There are a variety of statistical tests available, but they are all based on the comparison of within-group variance (how spread out the data is within a category) versus between-group variance (how different the categories are from one another).

If the between-group variance is large enough that there is little or no overlap between groups, then your statistical test will reflect that by showing a low p -value . This means it is unlikely that the differences between these groups came about by chance.

Alternatively, if there is high within-group variance and low between-group variance, then your statistical test will reflect that with a high p -value. This means it is likely that any difference you measure between groups is due to chance.

Your choice of statistical test will be based on the type of variables and the level of measurement of your collected data .

• an estimate of the difference in average height between the two groups.
• a p -value showing how likely you are to see this difference if the null hypothesis of no difference is true.

Based on the outcome of your statistical test, you will have to decide whether to reject or fail to reject your null hypothesis.

In most cases you will use the p -value generated by your statistical test to guide your decision. And in most cases, your predetermined level of significance for rejecting the null hypothesis will be 0.05 – that is, when there is a less than 5% chance that you would see these results if the null hypothesis were true.

In some cases, researchers choose a more conservative level of significance, such as 0.01 (1%). This minimizes the risk of incorrectly rejecting the null hypothesis ( Type I error ).

Here's why students love Scribbr's proofreading services

Discover proofreading & editing

The results of hypothesis testing will be presented in the results and discussion sections of your research paper , dissertation or thesis .

In the results section you should give a brief summary of the data and a summary of the results of your statistical test (for example, the estimated difference between group means and associated p -value). In the discussion , you can discuss whether your initial hypothesis was supported by your results or not.

In the formal language of hypothesis testing, we talk about rejecting or failing to reject the null hypothesis. You will probably be asked to do this in your statistics assignments.

However, when presenting research results in academic papers we rarely talk this way. Instead, we go back to our alternate hypothesis (in this case, the hypothesis that men are on average taller than women) and state whether the result of our test did or did not support the alternate hypothesis.

If your null hypothesis was rejected, this result is interpreted as “supported the alternate hypothesis.”

These are superficial differences; you can see that they mean the same thing.

You might notice that we don’t say that we reject or fail to reject the alternate hypothesis . This is because hypothesis testing is not designed to prove or disprove anything. It is only designed to test whether a pattern we measure could have arisen spuriously, or by chance.

If we reject the null hypothesis based on our research (i.e., we find that it is unlikely that the pattern arose by chance), then we can say our test lends support to our hypothesis . But if the pattern does not pass our decision rule, meaning that it could have arisen by chance, then we say the test is inconsistent with our hypothesis .

If you want to know more about statistics , methodology , or research bias , make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples.

• Normal distribution
• Descriptive statistics
• Measures of central tendency
• Correlation coefficient

Methodology

• Cluster sampling
• Stratified sampling
• Types of interviews
• Cohort study
• Thematic analysis

Research bias

• Implicit bias
• Cognitive bias
• Survivorship bias
• Availability heuristic
• Nonresponse bias
• Regression to the mean

Hypothesis testing is a formal procedure for investigating our ideas about the world using statistics. It is used by scientists to test specific predictions, called hypotheses , by calculating how likely it is that a pattern or relationship between variables could have arisen by chance.

A hypothesis states your predictions about what your research will find. It is a tentative answer to your research question that has not yet been tested. For some research projects, you might have to write several hypotheses that address different aspects of your research question.

A hypothesis is not just a guess — it should be based on existing theories and knowledge. It also has to be testable, which means you can support or refute it through scientific research methods (such as experiments, observations and statistical analysis of data).

Null and alternative hypotheses are used in statistical hypothesis testing . The null hypothesis of a test always predicts no effect or no relationship between variables, while the alternative hypothesis states your research prediction of an effect or relationship.

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.

Bevans, R. (2023, June 22). Hypothesis Testing | A Step-by-Step Guide with Easy Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved July 15, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/statistics/hypothesis-testing/

Is this article helpful?

Rebecca Bevans

Other students also liked, choosing the right statistical test | types & examples, understanding p values | definition and examples, what is your plagiarism score.

Definition of a Hypothesis

What it is and how it's used in sociology

• Key Concepts
• Major Sociologists
• News & Issues
• Research, Samples, and Statistics
• Recommended Reading
• Archaeology

A hypothesis is a prediction of what will be found at the outcome of a research project and is typically focused on the relationship between two different variables studied in the research. It is usually based on both theoretical expectations about how things work and already existing scientific evidence.

Within social science, a hypothesis can take two forms. It can predict that there is no relationship between two variables, in which case it is a null hypothesis . Or, it can predict the existence of a relationship between variables, which is known as an alternative hypothesis.

In either case, the variable that is thought to either affect or not affect the outcome is known as the independent variable, and the variable that is thought to either be affected or not is the dependent variable.

Researchers seek to determine whether or not their hypothesis, or hypotheses if they have more than one, will prove true. Sometimes they do, and sometimes they do not. Either way, the research is considered successful if one can conclude whether or not a hypothesis is true. 

Null Hypothesis

A researcher has a null hypothesis when she or he believes, based on theory and existing scientific evidence, that there will not be a relationship between two variables. For example, when examining what factors influence a person's highest level of education within the U.S., a researcher might expect that place of birth, number of siblings, and religion would not have an impact on the level of education. This would mean the researcher has stated three null hypotheses.

Alternative Hypothesis

Taking the same example, a researcher might expect that the economic class and educational attainment of one's parents, and the race of the person in question are likely to have an effect on one's educational attainment. Existing evidence and social theories that recognize the connections between wealth and cultural resources , and how race affects access to rights and resources in the U.S. , would suggest that both economic class and educational attainment of the one's parents would have a positive effect on educational attainment. In this case, economic class and educational attainment of one's parents are independent variables, and one's educational attainment is the dependent variable—it is hypothesized to be dependent on the other two.

Conversely, an informed researcher would expect that being a race other than white in the U.S. is likely to have a negative impact on a person's educational attainment. This would be characterized as a negative relationship, wherein being a person of color has a negative effect on one's educational attainment. In reality, this hypothesis proves true, with the exception of Asian Americans , who go to college at a higher rate than whites do. However, Blacks and Hispanics and Latinos are far less likely than whites and Asian Americans to go to college.

Formulating a Hypothesis

Formulating a hypothesis can take place at the very beginning of a research project , or after a bit of research has already been done. Sometimes a researcher knows right from the start which variables she is interested in studying, and she may already have a hunch about their relationships. Other times, a researcher may have an interest in ​a particular topic, trend, or phenomenon, but he may not know enough about it to identify variables or formulate a hypothesis.

Whenever a hypothesis is formulated, the most important thing is to be precise about what one's variables are, what the nature of the relationship between them might be, and how one can go about conducting a study of them.

Updated by Nicki Lisa Cole, Ph.D

• Null Hypothesis Examples
• Examples of Independent and Dependent Variables
• Difference Between Independent and Dependent Variables
• The Difference Between Control Group and Experimental Group
• What Is a Hypothesis? (Science)
• Understanding Path Analysis
• What Are the Elements of a Good Hypothesis?
• What It Means When a Variable Is Spurious
• What 'Fail to Reject' Means in a Hypothesis Test
• How Intervening Variables Work in Sociology
• Null Hypothesis Definition and Examples
• Understanding Simple vs Controlled Experiments
• Scientific Method Vocabulary Terms
• Null Hypothesis and Alternative Hypothesis
• Six Steps of the Scientific Method
• What Are Examples of a Hypothesis?

What Is A Research (Scientific) Hypothesis? A plain-language explainer + examples

By:  Derek Jansen (MBA)  | Reviewed By: Dr Eunice Rautenbach | June 2020

If you’re new to the world of research, or it’s your first time writing a dissertation or thesis, you’re probably noticing that the words “research hypothesis” and “scientific hypothesis” are used quite a bit, and you’re wondering what they mean in a research context .

“Hypothesis” is one of those words that people use loosely, thinking they understand what it means. However, it has a very specific meaning within academic research. So, it’s important to understand the exact meaning before you start hypothesizing. 

Research Hypothesis 101

• What is a hypothesis ?
• What is a research hypothesis (scientific hypothesis)?
• Requirements for a research hypothesis
• Definition of a research hypothesis
• The null hypothesis

What is a hypothesis?

Let’s start with the general definition of a hypothesis (not a research hypothesis or scientific hypothesis), according to the Cambridge Dictionary:

Hypothesis: an idea or explanation for something that is based on known facts but has not yet been proved.

In other words, it’s a statement that provides an explanation for why or how something works, based on facts (or some reasonable assumptions), but that has not yet been specifically tested . For example, a hypothesis might look something like this:

Hypothesis: sleep impacts academic performance.

This statement predicts that academic performance will be influenced by the amount and/or quality of sleep a student engages in – sounds reasonable, right? It’s based on reasonable assumptions , underpinned by what we currently know about sleep and health (from the existing literature). So, loosely speaking, we could call it a hypothesis, at least by the dictionary definition.

But that’s not good enough…

Unfortunately, that’s not quite sophisticated enough to describe a research hypothesis (also sometimes called a scientific hypothesis), and it wouldn’t be acceptable in a dissertation, thesis or research paper . In the world of academic research, a statement needs a few more criteria to constitute a true research hypothesis .

What is a research hypothesis?

A research hypothesis (also called a scientific hypothesis) is a statement about the expected outcome of a study (for example, a dissertation or thesis). To constitute a quality hypothesis, the statement needs to have three attributes – specificity , clarity and testability .

Let’s take a look at these more closely.

Need a helping hand?

Hypothesis Essential #1: Specificity & Clarity

A good research hypothesis needs to be extremely clear and articulate about both what’ s being assessed (who or what variables are involved ) and the expected outcome (for example, a difference between groups, a relationship between variables, etc.).

Let’s stick with our sleepy students example and look at how this statement could be more specific and clear.

Hypothesis: Students who sleep at least 8 hours per night will, on average, achieve higher grades in standardised tests than students who sleep less than 8 hours a night.

As you can see, the statement is very specific as it identifies the variables involved (sleep hours and test grades), the parties involved (two groups of students), as well as the predicted relationship type (a positive relationship). There’s no ambiguity or uncertainty about who or what is involved in the statement, and the expected outcome is clear.

Contrast that to the original hypothesis we looked at – “Sleep impacts academic performance” – and you can see the difference. “Sleep” and “academic performance” are both comparatively vague , and there’s no indication of what the expected relationship direction is (more sleep or less sleep). As you can see, specificity and clarity are key.

Hypothesis Essential #2: Testability (Provability)

A statement must be testable to qualify as a research hypothesis. In other words, there needs to be a way to prove (or disprove) the statement. If it’s not testable, it’s not a hypothesis – simple as that.

For example, consider the hypothesis we mentioned earlier:

Hypothesis: Students who sleep at least 8 hours per night will, on average, achieve higher grades in standardised tests than students who sleep less than 8 hours a night.  

We could test this statement by undertaking a quantitative study involving two groups of students, one that gets 8 or more hours of sleep per night for a fixed period, and one that gets less. We could then compare the standardised test results for both groups to see if there’s a statistically significant difference. 

Again, if you compare this to the original hypothesis we looked at – “Sleep impacts academic performance” – you can see that it would be quite difficult to test that statement, primarily because it isn’t specific enough. How much sleep? By who? What type of academic performance?

So, remember the mantra – if you can’t test it, it’s not a hypothesis 🙂

Defining A Research Hypothesis

You’re still with us? Great! Let’s recap and pin down a clear definition of a hypothesis.

A research hypothesis (or scientific hypothesis) is a statement about an expected relationship between variables, or explanation of an occurrence, that is clear, specific and testable.

So, when you write up hypotheses for your dissertation or thesis, make sure that they meet all these criteria. If you do, you’ll not only have rock-solid hypotheses but you’ll also ensure a clear focus for your entire research project.

What about the null hypothesis?

You may have also heard the terms null hypothesis , alternative hypothesis, or H-zero thrown around. At a simple level, the null hypothesis is the counter-proposal to the original hypothesis.

For example, if the hypothesis predicts that there is a relationship between two variables (for example, sleep and academic performance), the null hypothesis would predict that there is no relationship between those variables.

At a more technical level, the null hypothesis proposes that no statistical significance exists in a set of given observations and that any differences are due to chance alone.

And there you have it – hypotheses in a nutshell. 

If you have any questions, be sure to leave a comment below and we’ll do our best to help you. If you need hands-on help developing and testing your hypotheses, consider our private coaching service , where we hold your hand through the research journey.

Psst... there’s more!

This post was based on one of our popular Research Bootcamps . If you're working on a research project, you'll definitely want to check this out ...

16 Comments

Very useful information. I benefit more from getting more information in this regard.

Very great insight,educative and informative. Please give meet deep critics on many research data of public international Law like human rights, environment, natural resources, law of the sea etc

In a book I read a distinction is made between null, research, and alternative hypothesis. As far as I understand, alternative and research hypotheses are the same. Can you please elaborate? Best Afshin

This is a self explanatory, easy going site. I will recommend this to my friends and colleagues.

Very good definition. How can I cite your definition in my thesis? Thank you. Is nul hypothesis compulsory in a research?

It’s a counter-proposal to be proven as a rejection

Please what is the difference between alternate hypothesis and research hypothesis?

It is a very good explanation. However, it limits hypotheses to statistically tasteable ideas. What about for qualitative researches or other researches that involve quantitative data that don’t need statistical tests?

In qualitative research, one typically uses propositions, not hypotheses.

could you please elaborate it more

I’ve benefited greatly from these notes, thank you.

This is very helpful

well articulated ideas are presented here, thank you for being reliable sources of information

Excellent. Thanks for being clear and sound about the research methodology and hypothesis (quantitative research)

I have only a simple question regarding the null hypothesis. – Is the null hypothesis (Ho) known as the reversible hypothesis of the alternative hypothesis (H1? – How to test it in academic research?

this is very important note help me much more

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

• What Is Research Methodology? Simple Definition (With Examples) - Grad Coach - […] Contrasted to this, a quantitative methodology is typically used when the research aims and objectives are confirmatory in nature. For example,…

Submit a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

• Print Friendly

• Skip to primary navigation
• Skip to main content
• Skip to footer

Science Struck

What’s the Real Difference Between Hypothesis and Prediction

Both hypothesis and prediction fall in the realm of guesswork, but with different assumptions. This Buzzle write-up below will elaborate on the differences between hypothesis and prediction.

Like it? Share it!

“There is no justifiable prediction about how the hypothesis will hold up in the future; its degree of corroboration simply is a historical statement describing how severely the hypothesis has been tested in the past.” ― Robert Nozick, American author, professor, and philosopher

A lot of people tend to think that a hypothesis is the same as prediction, but this is not true. They are entirely different terms, though they can be manifested within the same example. They are both entities that stem from statistics, and are used in a variety of applications like finance, mathematics, science (widely), sports, psychology, etc. A hypothesis may be a prediction, but the reverse may not be true.

Also, a prediction may or may not agree with the hypothesis. Confused? Don’t worry, read the hypothesis vs. prediction comparison, provided below with examples, to clear your doubts regarding both these entities.

• A hypothesis is a kind of guess or proposition regarding a situation.
• It can be called a kind of intelligent guess or prediction, and it needs to be proved using different methods.
• Formulating a hypothesis is an important step in experimental design, for it helps to predict things that might take place in the course of research.
• The strength of the statement is based on how effectively it is proved while conducting experiments.
• It is usually written in the ‘If-then-because’ format.
• For example, ‘ If Susan’s mood depends on the weather, then she will be happy today, because it is bright and sunny outside. ‘. Here, Susan’s mood is the dependent variable, and the weather is the independent variable. Thus, a hypothesis helps establish a relationship.
• A prediction is also a type of guess, in fact, it is a guesswork in the true sense of the word.
• It is not an educated guess, like a hypothesis, i.e., it is based on established facts.
• While making a prediction for various applications, you have to take into account all the current observations.
• It can be testable, but just once. This goes to prove that the strength of the statement is based on whether the predicted event occurs or not.
• It is harder to define, and it contains many variations, which is why, probably, it is confused to be a fictional guess or forecast.
• For example, He is studying very hard, he might score an A . Here, we are predicting that since the student is working hard, he might score good marks. It is based on an observation and does not establish any relationship.

Factors of Differentiation

♦ Consider a statement, ‘If I add some chili powder, the pasta may become spicy’. This is a hypothesis, and a testable statement. You can carry on adding 1 pinch of chili powder, or a spoon, or two spoons, and so on. The dish may become spicier or pungent, or there may be no reaction at all. The sum and substance is that, the amount of chili powder is the independent variable here, and the pasta dish is the dependent variable, which is expected to change with the addition of chili powder. This statement thus establishes and analyzes the relationship between both variables, and you will get a variety of results when the test is performed multiple times. Your hypothesis may even be opposed tomorrow.

♦ Consider the statement, ‘Robert has longer legs, he may run faster’. This is just a prediction. You may have read somewhere that people with long legs tend to run faster. It may or may not be true. What is important here is ‘Robert’. You are talking only of Robert’s legs, so you will test if he runs faster. If he does, your prediction is true, if he doesn’t, your prediction is false. No more testing.

♦ Consider a statement, ‘If you eat chocolates, you may get acne’. This is a simple hypothesis, based on facts, yet necessary to be proven. It can be tested on a number of people. It may be true, it may be false. The fact is, it defines a relationship between chocolates and acne. The relationship can be analyzed and the results can be recorded. Tomorrow, someone might come up with an alternative hypothesis that chocolate does not cause acne. This will need to be tested again, and so on. A hypothesis is thus, something that you think happens due to a reason.

♦ Consider a statement, ‘The sky is overcast, it may rain today’. A simple guess, based on the fact that it generally rains if the sky is overcast. It may not even be testable, i.e., the sky can be overcast now and clear the next minute. If it does rain, you have predicted correctly. If it does not, you are wrong. No further analysis or questions.

Both hypothesis and prediction need to be effectively structured so that further analysis of the problem statement is easier. Remember that, the key difference between the two is the procedure of proving the statements. Also, you cannot state one is better than the other, this depends entirely on the application in hand.

Get Updates Right to Your Inbox

Privacy overview.

• Skip to primary navigation
• Skip to main content
• Skip to primary sidebar
• Skip to footer

Understanding Science

How science REALLY works...

• Understanding Science 101
• Misconceptions
• Testing ideas with evidence from the natural world is at the core of science.
• Scientific testing involves figuring out what we would  expect  to observe if an idea were correct and comparing that expectation to what we  actually  observe.
• Scientific arguments are built from an idea and the evidence relevant to that idea.
• Scientific arguments can be built in any order. Sometimes a scientific idea precedes any evidence relevant to it, and other times the evidence helps inspire the idea.

Misconception:  Science proves ideas.

Misconception:  Science can only disprove ideas.

Correction:  Science neither proves nor disproves. It accepts or rejects ideas based on supporting and refuting evidence, but may revise those conclusions if warranted by new evidence or perspectives.  Read more about it.

The core of science: Relating evidence and ideas

In this case, the term  argument  refers not to a disagreement between two people, but to an evidence-based line of reasoning — so scientific arguments are more like the closing argument in a court case (a logical description of what we think and why we think it) than they are like the fights you may have had with siblings. Scientific arguments involve three components: the idea (a  hypothesis  or theory), the  expectations  generated by that idea (frequently called predictions), and the actual observations relevant to those expectations (the evidence). These components are always related in the same logical way:

• What would we expect to see if this idea were true (i.e., what is our expected observation)?
• What do we actually observe?
• Do our expectations match our observations?

PREDICTIONS OR EXPECTATIONS?

When scientists describe their arguments, they frequently talk about their expectations in terms of what a hypothesis or theory predicts: “If it were the case that smoking causes lung cancer, then we’d  predict  that countries with higher rates of smoking would have higher rates of lung cancer.” At first, it might seem confusing to talk about a prediction that doesn’t deal with the future, but that refers to something going on right now or that may have already happened. In fact, this is just another way of discussing the expectations that the hypothesis or theory generates. So when a scientist talks about the  predicted  rates of lung cancer, he or she really means something like “the rates that we’d expect to see if our hypothesis were correct.”

If the idea generates expectations that hold true (are actually observed), then the idea is more likely to be accurate. If the idea generates expectations that don’t hold true (are not observed), then we are less likely to  accept  the idea. For example, consider the idea that cells are the building blocks of life. If that idea were true, we’d expect to see cells in all kinds of living tissues observed under a microscope — that’s our expected observation. In fact, we do observe this (our actual observation), so evidence supports the idea that living things are built from cells.

Though the structure of this argument is consistent (hypothesis, then expectation, then actual observation), its pieces may be assembled in different orders. For example, the first observations of cells were made in the 1600s, but cell theory was not postulated until 200 years later — so in this case, the evidence actually helped inspire the idea. Whether the idea comes first or the evidence comes first, the logic relating them remains the same.

Here, we’ll explore scientific arguments and how to build them. You can investigate:

Putting the pieces together: The hard work of building arguments

• Predicting the past
• Arguments with legs to stand on

Or just click the  Next  button to dive right in!

• Take a sidetrip
• Teaching resources

Scientific arguments rely on testable ideas. To learn what makes an idea testable, review our  Science Checklist .

• Forming hypotheses — scientific explanations — can be difficult for students. It is often easier for students to generate an expectation (what they think will happen or what they expect to observe) based on prior experience than to formulate a potential explanation for that phenomena. You can help students go beyond expectations to generate real, explanatory hypotheses by providing sentence stems for them to fill in: “I expect to observe A because B.” Once students have filled in this sentence you can explain that B is a hypothesis and A is the expectation generated by that hypothesis.
• You can help students learn to distinguish between hypotheses and the expectations generated by them by regularly asking students to analyze lecture material, text, or video. Students should try to figure out which aspects of the content were hypotheses and which were expectations.

Summing up the process

Subscribe to our newsletter

• The science flowchart
• Science stories
• Grade-level teaching guides
• Teaching resource database
• Journaling tool

• Skip to primary navigation
• Skip to main content
• Skip to primary sidebar
• Skip to footer

Stay Informed Group

Stay informed with opportunities online

Hypothesis vs Prediction: Differences and Comparison

September 8, 2023 by Chukwuemeka Gabriel Leave a Comment

A hypothesis is a tentative conjecture that explains an observation, phenomenon or scientific problem that can be tested through observation, investigation or scientific experimentation.

A prediction is a statement of what will happen in the future. Based on the continuous recent outcome of an event, one can make a prediction on what will happen next.

A prediction is basically a forecast. It’s a statement of what will happen in the future based on collected data, evidence, or previous knowledge.

A hypothesis is an assumption considered to be true for the purpose of argument or investigation.

In the academic world, hypotheses and predictions are important elements of the scientific process. However, there are key differences between a hypothesis vs prediction and we will be looking at those differences in this article.

What Is a Hypothesis?

A hypothesis is a tentative conjecture that explains a phenomenon, observation, or scientific problem that can be tested through scientific experimentation, observation or investigation.

It’s an assumption considered to be true for the purpose of argument or investigation. It’s a statement that gives an answer to a proposed question by using actual facts and research.

Researchers form hypotheses for the purpose of explaining a certain phenomenon. To prove their point, they make their hypotheses before starting their scientific experiments.

A hypothesis is an assumption that can be approved or disapproved. It’s considered a predictive statement for research and can be tested using scientific methods.

Also Read: Diploma vs Degree: Differences and Comparison

What Is a Prediction?

A prediction is a statement that describes what will happen in the future. Based on the continuous recent outcome of an event, one can make a prediction on what will happen next.

It’s a statement of what will happen in the future based on collected data, evidence, or previous knowledge.

Predictions can be a guess based on the collective data or instinct. If you have noticed an occurrence regularly, you are likely to make correct predictions about that occurrence.

For instance, if a mailman comes to your house each day at exactly 3 p.m. for five days straight, you might predict the time the mailman will come to your house the next day.

Your prediction that the mailman will arrive at your house at exactly 3 p.m. is based on your previous observations.

A prediction is considered an informed guess if it comes out from a person with the subject knowledge. Using accurate data and logical reasoning based on close observation leads to a probable prediction.

Hypothesis vs Prediction: Differences between Hypothesis and Prediction

It’s an educated guess for a scientific problem or phenomenon, while a prediction is a statement of what will happen in the future. In science, hypotheses are based on recent knowledge and understanding.

It’s an assumption considered to be true for the purpose of argument or investigation.

Predictions describe future events or outcomes and it’s a statement of what will happen in the future based on collected data, evidence, or previous knowledge.

Also Read: Meter vs Yard: Difference and Comparison

Hypothesis vs Prediction: Comparison Chart

Hypothesis vs Prediction: Similarities between Hypothesis and Prediction

Both hypothesis and prediction are statements defining the relationship between variables or the result of an event. A hypothesis and a prediction can be tested, verified and rejected or supported by evidence for the purpose of future research.

While predictions describe potential future events, hypotheses are statements describing potential cause-and-effect relationships.

Also Read: Genotype vs Phenotype: Differences and Comparison

Hypothesis vs Prediction: Tips on How to Write a Hypothesis

Here is how to write a hypothesis, with simple steps.

State your research question

Firstly, state your research questions orderly and clear. You should include an answer to the problem statement or research question in the hypothesis.

Next, create a topic-centric challenge once you have clearly understood the limitations of the study topic you selected. This will enable you to formulate a hypothesis and any other research you need to conduct for collecting data.

Conduct an inspection

Once you have successfully established your study, preliminary research should be carried out. Read through your previous hypothesis, any academic article, or data.

Make a three-dimensional theory

Every hypothesis often includes variables, so it’s important for you to create a correlation between your independent and dependent variables. You will do this by identifying both variables.

Write the first draft

Once you have everything set up, you can then compose your hypothesis.

Firstly, you start by writing the first draft and then write your research based on what you want it to be. Make sure that your independent and dependent variables vary, as well as the connection between them.

Hypothesis vs Prediction: Advantages of Hypothesis

Let’s explore a few advantages of using a hypothesis in scientific research.

• A hypothesis can be tested and verified through scientific experimentation, observation, or investigation. It can be verified or rejected.
• Hypothesis guides further research, as it suggests observations and scientific experiments that should be carried out.
• Hypothesis encourages critical thinking and helps to identify cause-and-effect relationships.

Disadvantages of Hypothesis

• Using a hypothesis can limit the scope. In reality, research findings may be limited by hypotheses.
• Also, research findings may not be generalized if hypotheses are strictly applicable to a specific population.

Also Read: Seminar vs Workshop: Difference and Comparison

Hypothesis vs Prediction: Advantages of Prediction

• Prediction can be used by both people and organizations to make future plans for specific events like weather or market trends.
• Predictions help in decision-making. It provides insight into the potential results of various actions.
• It helps in risk management. With predictions, stock market fluctuations or natural disasters can be foreseen.
• It can provide assistance in allocating resources like inventory, budget, and workforce.

Disadvantages of Predictions

• Predictions can be inaccurate and should not be totally relied on.
• It can be influenced by bias, which can lead to inaccurate predictions.

Both hypothesis and prediction are statements defining the relationship between variables or the result of an event.

Based on the continuous recent outcome of an event, one can make a prediction on what will happen next. A hypothesis is an educated guess for a scientific problem or phenomenon, while a prediction is a statement of what will happen in the future.

Recommendations

• Bussing vs Busing: Difference and Comparison
• Pint vs Quart: Difference and Comparison
• Superheroine vs Heroine: Difference and Comparison
• Chilly vs Cool: Difference and Comparison
• Family Medicine vs Internal Medicine: Difference and Comparison
• Indeed : Hypothesis vs. Prediction: What’s the Difference?
• Keydifferences : Difference Between Hypothesis and Prediction
• Diffzy : Difference Between Hypothesis and Prediction
• Testbooks : Difference Between Hypothesis and Prediction
• Askanydifference : Hypothesis vs Prediction: Difference and Comparison

About Chukwuemeka Gabriel

Gabriel Chukwuemeka is a graduate of Physics; he loves Geography and has in-depth knowledge of Astrophysics. Gabriel is an ardent writer who writes for Stay Informed Group and enjoys looking at the world map when he is not writing.

Reader Interactions

Leave a reply cancel reply.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

What Are The 12 Ivy League Schools in 2024?

Examples of praying scripture for students, 21 top dental schools for international students 2024, negative effects of technology you should know, do scholarships count as income, 39 best law schools in uk and ranking, woods vs. forest: what is the difference, top 10 marketable careers in the world in 2024, what are the best architecture schools in the us, 15 best psychology schools in the world 2024, what are the best exercise science schools, 10 best medical schools in mexico in 2024, student loan forgiveness: how to obtain a student loan forgiveness, what are the 14 punctuation marks for effective english writing, top rated universities in canada with the highest acceptance rate, reasons why is education important all you need to know, most important languages to learn for more opportunities, top tips for first-year students, 10 tips to choosing an online college, 100 positive affirmations for students, what is the difference between going green and sustainability, how many nickels make a dollar all you need to know, highest paid military in the world in 2024 (top 10 countries), how to record a meeting on microsoft teams, 5 universities in cambridge massachusetts ma, 25 cheapest universities in usa for international students, 32 best work from home companies that are legit, 15 google meet ideas for teachers, 25 short term courses with high salary, career opportunities for bcom students, how to become a pilot with or without a degree, how to become a home inspector, is a master’s in information technology worth it, how to build a career in digital marketing, is an online associate degree in health science for you, how to become a video game designer, what is a business lawyer, how to capitalize job titles, project management methodologies: definition, types and examples, career development plan: how to create a career plan, what does a film producer do, how to become a medical writer, how to become a music producer without school, 20 high paying part time jobs, motivation letter for job application example 2024.

By providing your information, you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy . We use vendors that may also process your information to help provide our services. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA Enterprise and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

The House of the Dragon Season 2 Theories & How Else the Show Could Deviate From the Books

• Share on Facebook
• Share to Flipboard
• Show more sharing options
• Post to Tumblr
• Submit to Reddit
• Share on LinkedIn
• Share on WhatsApp
• Print This Page

Now that House of the Dragon has proven to be a return to the quality of Game of Thrones (pre-final season), fans are happy to propose new theories concerning the future of House Targaryen. The prequel TV show based on George R. R. Martin’s Fire & Blood focuses on the civil war over whether Rhaenyra Targaryen or her younger half-brother, Aegon Targaryen, will ascend the Iron Throne. However, some popular House of the Dragon Season 2 theories deviate from the source material.

The House of the Dragon Season 2 theories

Some information in Fire & Blood is presented as speculative in the context of a pseudo-historical account, based on rumors among courtiers and the common people. As the show forges ahead with its sophomore season, fans have cleverly adapted their House of the Dragon Season 2 theories to account for things “Mushroom” may have misinterpreted. House of the Dragon has established that the show is willing to make some definitive changes—such as Maelor not yet being born at the time of Blood and Cheese’s attack —making most fan theories technically possible.

Rhaenyra and Syrax Ride into Battle

In the book, Rhaenyra is absent from the action of the Dance of the Dragons, ruling while others carry out the actual warfare. In the show, the Greens and the Blacks implore their respective monarchs to protect themselves. However, moments from the season 2 trailer showed Rhaenyra wielding weapons and riding Syrax like they are headed into battle, inciting debate over how the show will depict her role in the war. Rhaenyra is likely to get more bloodthirsty as the war goes on, and her arc may progress as a complex story in which she leads as a politician and a warrior.

Season 2 has started foreshadowing the Battle of the Gullet, but the Battle at Rook’s Rest takes place first. Rook’s Rest results in Rhaenys Targaryen’s death, while Rhaenyra’s oldest son Jaecerys “Jace” is killed at the Gullet, and her youngest son Viserys is presumed dead. These tragedies are reason enough for Rhaenyra to get personally involved. If House of the Dragon takes some creative liberties with the source material, Rhaenyra could ride to retake Rook’s Rest or end the Battle of the Gullet.

Aemond Is the Father of Helaena’s Children

Aemond being the biological father of Aegon and Helaena’s twins is an old theory, but one that could still influence the characters’ arcs. As the Targeryens are fine with incest, Aegon and Helaena are arranged to marry each other in their teens. However, no one would know the difference whether Aegon or Aemond fathered Jaehaerys and Jaehaera, as they and their sister are all too genetically similar.

Aegon and Aemond have a pernicious relationship, while people have pointed out Aemond subtly defending Helaena at Aegon’s disastrous coronation. Additionally, Aegon and Helana’s youngest child Maelor could still be born, which would inherently prompt debate about who his father is. If the theories about Aemond and Helaena’s relationship are true, it could incite extra drama as the dynamics among the siblings become more tense—while a war rages outside the castle walls.

Jace Returns to the Wall

The season 2 premiere features an intriguing scene where Cregan Stark takes Jace to the Wall to impart the magnitude of the ever-present threat that lies beyond. When marketing first revealed parts of this scene, it sparked debate over why Jace was even there. House of the Dragon wants to maintain the Game of Thrones theme of how political squabbles are meaningless in the face of a greater threat. Jace is busy fighting his mother’s war but is meant to spend more time in the North, cementing his friendship with Cregan. These plot elements could all tie together if Jace revisits the Wall and learns more about the White Walkers. Jace could then become another voice of how dangerous it is to divide the country when they need to stand united.

Rhaena Becomes Nettles

Daemon Targaryen’s daughter Rhaena still doesn’t have a dragon and has now been sent away with Rhaenyra’s younger sons in her charge. Rhaena’s dragon Morning is supposed to hatch too late for her to have a dragon big enough for battle during the war. However, theories propose that Rhaena could enter the Dance of the Dragons sooner if she becomes Fire & Blood’s Nettles, who claims the dragon Sheepstealer. Nettles is one of the “dragonseeds,” bastards of Valyrian descent recruited by Jace to ride the Blacks’ extra dragons.

Rhaena wants to fight, even if it means leaving the youngest Targaryens and adopting a new identity. Jace and Daemon would recognize her but may accept her as Nettles if she tames a dragon. Nettles becomes a valuable dragonrider in Rhaenyra’s service; she is also rumored to be Daemon’s lover. However, Daemon may have just encouraged the rumors to conceal that his second daughter had become a part of the conflict after all. Rhaena could then have a fascinating double life in her later years: Rhaena marries multiple times after the war for political reasons, while Nettles allegedly becomes the inspiration for stories about a “fire witch” told in the Vale.

Alicent Becomes Melisandre

In Fire & Blood , Alicent spends her final days in a tower, mourning her children and hating the color green, until she dies of a fever. However, fans have proposed the radical new fate for her of becoming Melisandre from Game of Thrones . Melisandre is centuries old and spends her life searching for the “Prince who was Promised.” Alicent knows the barest details about the “Song of Ice and Fire” and the kingdom’s prophesized savior. If Alicent ends House of the Dragon filled with regret for her part in the bloodshed, she could make it her mission to carry on the legacy of preparing Westeros to fight the White Walkers, setting out to learn Melisandre’s skill set as a means to an end.

Laenor Returns to Westeros

The original hypothesis counted among the most popular House of the Dragon Season 2 theories was that Laenor Velaryon would return as Addam of Hull, another dragonseed who claims Laenor’s dragon Seasmoke. However, this theory is now officially debunked because Addam and his brother Alyn debuted in the show as distinct characters. According to Fire & Blood , Addam and his brother Alyn are most likely the bastard sons of Corlys Velaryon (Laenor’s father). 

Yet Laenor is still alive, with a vested interest in protecting Rhaenyra and her family. The Daily Post seemingly confirmed that Laenor is returning for season 2, but under what pretense is still a mystery. Some theories suggest that he plays a role in saving Rhaenyra’s younger sons, which could work if Rhaena takes off to become Nettles: Leanor takes charge of the children (or just Viserys, as Joffrey and Aegon return to their mother in Fire & Blood ) in Essos so Rhaena can return as a dragonrider.

Larys Is a Warg

Larys Strong is now officially Aegon’s Master of Whisperers, and some fans believe he may be supernaturally qualified for this position. They have speculated that Larys is a Warg like Bran Stark, able to possess animals and spy on others through their eyes. Rats that conspicuously wander across the camera have given rise to the idea that Larys is always watching. If this is true, he is more dangerous than ever to Rhaenyra. Rhaenyra has allied with Mysaria, who has a veritable knowledge of every inch of King’s Landing. However, it will end in disaster if Larys has a supernatural advantage over her.

Daemon Survives the Dance of the Dragons

Daemon meets his end when he and Aemond engage in a brutal battle on dragonback; allegedly, both of them and their dragons are killed. However, Fire & Blood states that Daemon’s body is never found, inspiring theories about what may have become of Daemon. It would take a lot for Daemon to go into hiding and never meddle in Westerosi politics again. However, a recent episode shows that he is haunted by Jaehaerys’s murder. If his inner turmoil builds over the years, he may believe disappearing is in everyone’s best interest. Some people even say that Daemon could become the Night King—but more on that later.

The Maester Conspiracy

The maester conspiracy is also an older theory that the Westerosi maesters have long worked to rid Westeros of magic—namely, the Targaryens and their dragons—so an order of science and logic may prevail. House of the Dragon has shown more instances where the maesters may have turned the tide of history: Fans speculate that they mistreated both Queen Aemma and King Viserys (resulting in their deaths), misinformed the noble families, and stunted the dragons’ growth. Any comment made by one of the maesters could be a careful manipulation of how the Dance of the Dragons plays out.

One of the Targaryens Becomes the Night King

Different theories have arisen that either Aemond or Daemon could become the Night King, despite much of the canon contradicting it. Aemond is mostly due to the visual connection between his sapphire eye and the Night King’s glowing blue eyes, while Daemon is the more likely contender as no one knows for sure what happens to him after the war. The Children of the Forest created the Night King who was once a normal person; nothing is known about his human life. 

However, Game of Thrones shows him to have been “born” centuries before House of the Dragon . For this theory to work, the writers would either have to explain one of the Targaryens replacing the Night King before the Battle of Winterfell or completely retcon Game of Thrones . And given how unhappy people were with the final season of Game of Thrones , they possibly could get away with some of the House of the Dragon Season 2 theories that completely undo those events.

Most Popular

You may also like.

Information

• Author Services

Initiatives

You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.

All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .

Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.

Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.

Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.

Original Submission Date Received: .

• Active Journals
• Find a Journal
• Proceedings Series
• For Authors
• For Reviewers
• For Editors
• For Librarians
• For Publishers
• For Societies
• For Conference Organizers
• Open Access Policy
• Institutional Open Access Program
• Special Issues Guidelines
• Editorial Process
• Research and Publication Ethics
• Article Processing Charges
• Testimonials
• Preprints.org
• SciProfiles
• Encyclopedia

Article Menu

• Subscribe SciFeed
• Recommended Articles
• Google Scholar
• on Google Scholar
• Table of Contents

Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.

Please let us know what you think of our products and services.

Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.

JSmol Viewer

Multi-link prediction for mmwave wireless communication systems using liquid time-constant networks, long short- term memory, and interpretation using symbolic regression.

1. Introduction

1.1. related work, 1.2. contribution.

• Quantitative demonstration of substantial improvement in multi-link prediction for mmWave wireless communication systems using Liquid Time-Constant Networks (LTC) over conventional methods such as using Long Short-Term Memory.
• Interpretation of the SNR values of mmWave signal using Symbolic Regression.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. long short-term memory—lstm, 2.3. dataset: simulation.

• F S P L ( f , 1 m ) [ d B ] is the free space path loss in dB at a distance of 1 m and carrier frequency of f GHz;
• n is the path loss exponent (n = 2 for free space);
• A T [ d B ] is the total atmospheric absorption term;
• χ σ is the shadow fading (SF) that refers to the signal attenuation due to obstacles in the Line of Sight, modeled as a log-normal random variable with zero mean;
• σ is the standard deviation in dB.

2.4. Dataset Generation

2.5. snr calculation, 2.6. genetic programming based symbolic regression.

• population_size: The number of individuals (mathematical expressions) in each generation.
• function_set: The set of functions and terminals that can be used in the mathematical expressions.
• generations: The maximum number of generations to evolve the population.
• stopping_criteria: The threshold value for the Mean Absolute Error (MAE) to stop evolution if it falls below this value.
• p_crossover, p_subtree_mutation, p_hoist_mutation, p_point_mutation: The probabilities of applying crossover, subtree mutation, hoist mutation, and point mutation operations during evolution.
• max_samples: The maximum proportion of samples to use in each generation during fitness evaluation.
• verbose: Whether to enable verbose output during evolution.
• parsimony_coefficient: A coefficient to balance between the goodness of fit and the complexity (parsimony) of the mathematical expressions.
• random_state: The random seed for reproducibility.
• fit method: The fit method uses genetic programming to evolve a population of mathematical expressions. Genetic programming is a type of evolutionary algorithm that uses natural selection to find the best fit for a given set of data. In this case, the data are the training set, and the goal is to find a mathematical expression that can predict the target variable for any given set of features.
• predict method: The predict method uses the trained model to predict the output values for the test features. The test features are a set of data that were not used to train the model. The model uses the mathematical expression that it evolved during the fit method to predict the target variable for each test feature.
• Plot: The plot shows the true target values (y_test) against the test features (X_test) as points labeled “True function”. The plot also shows the predicted values (y_gp1) against the test features as points labeled “Symbolic function”. The two sets of points should be close together, which indicates that the model was able to learn the relationship between the features and the target variable.

3. Link Prediction Experiments and Results

Improvements with liquid time-constant network, 4. discussion, 5. conclusions, author contributions, institutional review board statement, informed consent statement, data availability statement, conflicts of interest.

• Fan, L.; Wang, J.; Chang, Y.; Li, Y.; Wang, Y.; Cao, D. 4D mmWave radar for autonomous driving perception: A comprehensive survey. IEEE Trans. Intell. Veh. 2024 , 9 , 4606–4620. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Usman, M.; Ansari, S.; Taha, A.; Zahid, A.; Abbasi, Q.H.; Imran, M.A. Terahertz-based joint communication and sensing for precision agriculture: A 6g use-case. Front. Commun. Netw. 2022 , 3 , 836506. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Le, T.T.; Van Nguyen, D.; Ryu, E.S. Computing offloading over mmWave for mobile VR: Make 360 video streaming alive. IEEE Access 2018 , 6 , 66576–66589. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Nallappan, K.; Guerboukha, H.; Nerguizian, C.; Skorobogatiy, M. Live streaming of uncompressed HD and 4K videos using terahertz wireless links. IEEE Access 2018 , 6 , 58030–58042. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Shah, S.H.A.; Sharma, M.; Rangan, S. LSTM-Based Multi-Link Prediction for mmWave and Sub-THz Wireless Systems. In Proceedings of the ICC 2020—2020 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), Dublin, Ireland, 7–11 June 2020; pp. 1–6. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Chahine, M.; Hasani, R.; Kao, P.; Ray, A.; Shubert, R.; Lechner, M.; Amini, A.; Rus, D. Robust flight navigation out of distribution with liquid neural networks. Sci. Robot. 2023 , 8 , eadc8892. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Chen, R.T.; Rubanova, Y.; Bettencourt, J.; Duvenaud, D.K. Neural ordinary differential equations. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 2018 , 31 , 6571–6583. [ Google Scholar ]
• Hasani, R.; Lechner, M.; Amini, A.; Rus, D.; Grosu, R. Liquid time-constant networks. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Virtual, 2–9 February 2021; Volume 35, pp. 7657–7666. [ Google Scholar ]
• Gajjar, P.; Saxena, A.; Acharya, K.; Shah, P.; Bhatt, C.; Nguyen, T.T. Liquidt: Stock market analysis using liquid time-constant neural networks. Int. J. Inf. Technol. 2024 , 16 , 909–920. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Sun, S.; Rappaport, T.S.; Rangan, S.; Thomas, T.A.; Ghosh, A.; Kovacs, I.Z.; Rodriguez, I.; Koymen, O.; Partyka, A.; Jarvelainen, J. Propagation path loss models for 5G urban micro-and macro-cellular scenarios. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE 83rd Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring), Nanjing, China, 15–18 May 2016; pp. 1–6. [ Google Scholar ]
• European Telecommunications Standards Institute. 5G; Study on Channel Model for Frequencies from 0.5 to 100 GHz; Technical Report V16.1.0, 3GPP. 2020. Available online: https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_tr/138900_138999/138901/16.01.00_60/tr_138901v160100p.pdf (accessed on 16 June 2024).
• Xing, Y.; Rappaport, T.S. Millimeter Wave and Terahertz Urban Microcell Propagation Measurements and Models. IEEE Commun. Lett. 2021 , 25 , 3755–3759. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Xiao, X.; Hou, X.; Wang, C.; Li, Y.; Hui, P.; Chen, S. Jamcloud: Turning traffic jams into computation opportunities–whose time has come. IEEE Access 2019 , 7 , 115797–115815. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hou, X.; Li, Y.; Jin, D.; Wu, D.O.; Chen, S. Modeling the impact of mobility on the connectivity of vehicular networks in large-scale urban environments. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2015 , 65 , 2753–2758. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hossan, M.T.; Tabassum, H. Mobility-Aware Performance in Hybrid RF and Terahertz Wireless Networks. IEEE Trans. Commun. 2022 , 70 , 1376–1390. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Vankayala, S.K.; Gollapudi, S.K.S.; Jain, B.; Yoon, S.; Mihir, K.; Kumar, S.; Kumar, H.S.; Kommineni, I. Efficient Deep-Learning Models for Future Blockage and Beam Prediction for mmWave Systems. In Proceedings of the NOMS 2023-2023 IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management Symposium, Miami, FL, USA, 8–12 May 2023; pp. 1–8. [ Google Scholar ]
• Nagata, H.; Kudo, R.; Takahashi, K.; Ogawa, T.; Takasugi, K. Two-step wireless link quality prediction using multi-camera images. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE 33rd Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC), Kyoto, Japan, 12–15 September 2022; pp. 509–514. [ Google Scholar ]
• Charan, G.; Alkhateeb, A. Computer vision aided blockage prediction in real-world millimeter wave deployments. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 4–8 December 2022; pp. 1711–1716. [ Google Scholar ]
• Chen, H.; Sun, C.; Jiang, F.; Jiang, J. Beams selection for MmWave multi-connection based on sub-6GHz predicting and parallel transfer learning. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE/CIC International Conference on Communications in China (ICCC), Xiamen, China, 28–30 July 2021; pp. 469–474. [ Google Scholar ]
• Jin, W.; Kim, H.; Lee, H. A Novel Machine Learning Scheme for mmWave Path Loss Modeling for 5G Communications in Dense Urban Scenarios. Electronics 2022 , 11 , 1809. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Liu, Y.; Blough, D.M. Environment-aware link quality prediction for millimeter-wave wireless lans. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Symposium on Mobility Management and Wireless Access, Montreal, QC, Canada, 24–28 October 2022; pp. 1–10. [ Google Scholar ]
• Nuñez, Y.; Lovisolo, L.; da Silva Mello, L.; Orihuela, C. On the interpretability of machine learning regression for path-loss prediction of millimeter-wave links. Expert Syst. Appl. 2023 , 215 , 119324. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Jia, H.; Chen, N.; Zhang, R.; Okada, M. Non-deterministic Quantization for mmWave Beam Prediction. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE 35th International System-on-Chip Conference (SOCC), Belfast, UK, 5–8 September 2022; pp. 1–6. [ Google Scholar ]
• Yang, S.; Ma, J.; Zhang, S.; Li, H. Beam Prediction for mmWave Massive MIMO using Adjustable Feature Fusion Learning. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE 95th Vehicular Technology Conference:(VTC2022-Spring), Helsinki, Finland, 19–22 June 2022; pp. 1–5. [ Google Scholar ]
• Fu, Z.; Du, F.; Zhao, X.; Geng, S.; Zhang, Y.; Qin, P. A Joint-Neural-Network-Based Channel Prediction for Millimeter-Wave Mobile Communications. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2023 , 22 , 1064–1068. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Yu, C.; Sun, Y.; Luo, Y.; Wang, R. mmAlert: mmWave Link Blockage Prediction via Passive Sensing. IEEE Wirel. Commun. Lett. 2023 , 12 , 2008–2012. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ohta, S.; Nishio, T.; Kudo, R.; Takahashi, K.; Nagata, H. Point cloud-based proactive link quality prediction for millimeter-wave communications. IEEE Trans. Mach. Learn. Commun. Netw. 2023 , 1 , 258–276. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Pendyala, V.; Kim, H. Assessing the Reliability of Machine Learning Models Applied to the Mental Health Domain Using Explainable AI. Electronics 2024 , 13 , 1025. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Sun, S.; MacCartney, G.R.; Rappaport, T.S. A novel millimeter-wave channel simulator and applications for 5G wireless communications. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), Paris, France, 21–25 May 2017; pp. 1–7. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Langdon, W.B.; Poli, R. Foundations of Genetic Programming ; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013. [ Google Scholar ]
• Hochreiter, S.; Schmidhuber, J. Long short-term memory. Neural Comput. 1997 , 9 , 1735–1780. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Javed, M.A.; Liu, P.; Panwar, S.S. Enhancing XR Application Performance in Multi-Connectivity Enabled mmWave Networks. IEEE Open J. Commun. Soc. 2023 , 4 , 2421–2438. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ju, S.; Kanhere, O.; Xing, Y.; Rappaport, T.S. A millimeter-wave channel simulator NYUSIM with spatial consistency and human blockage. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM), Waikoloa, HI, USA, 9–13 December 2019; pp. 1–6. [ Google Scholar ]
• Shah, S.H.A.; Rangan, S. Multi-Cell Multi-Beam Prediction Using Auto-Encoder LSTM for mmWave Systems. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 2022 , 21 , 10366–10380. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Icke, I.; Bongard, J.C. Improving genetic programming based symbolic regression using deterministic machine learning. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, Cancun, Mexico, 20–23 June 2013; pp. 1763–1770. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Software, G.G.V. Graphviz [Online]. 2024. Available online: https://graphviz.org/ (accessed on 16 June 2024).
• Chen, J.; He, Z.S.; Kuylenstierna, D.; Eriksson, T.; Hörberg, M.; Emanuelsson, T.; Swahn, T.; Zirath, H. Does LO Noise Floor Limit Performance in Multi-Gigabit Millimeter-Wave Communication? IEEE Microw. Wirel. Components Lett. 2017 , 27 , 769–771. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Virgolin, M.; Pissis, S.P. Symbolic Regression is NP-hard. arXiv 2022 , arXiv:2207.01018. [ Google Scholar ]

Click here to enlarge figure

Share and Cite

Pendyala, V.S.; Patil, M. Multi-Link Prediction for mmWave Wireless Communication Systems Using Liquid Time-Constant Networks, Long Short- Term Memory, and Interpretation Using Symbolic Regression. Electronics 2024 , 13 , 2736. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13142736

Pendyala VS, Patil M. Multi-Link Prediction for mmWave Wireless Communication Systems Using Liquid Time-Constant Networks, Long Short- Term Memory, and Interpretation Using Symbolic Regression. Electronics . 2024; 13(14):2736. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13142736

Pendyala, Vishnu S., and Milind Patil. 2024. "Multi-Link Prediction for mmWave Wireless Communication Systems Using Liquid Time-Constant Networks, Long Short- Term Memory, and Interpretation Using Symbolic Regression" Electronics 13, no. 14: 2736. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13142736

Article Metrics

Article access statistics, further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.

Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals