essays from inheritance

• Introduction to genomics
• In the cell
• Health and disease
• Living things
• Methods and technology
• Science in society
• Genomic conversations
• Resources for 5-12 year olds
• Resources for 13-18 year olds
• Resources for 18+ year olds
• Resources for educators
• Careers in Genomics
• Wellcome Genome Campus

Explore Genomics > In the Cell

What is inheritance?

Inheritance is the way that genetic information is passed from a parent to a child.

• Members of the same biological family tend to have similar characteristics – including physical appearance and the likelihood of developing certain genetic conditions. 
• Inheritance describes the way these traits are passed down between generations, with genetic information passed from a parent to a child.
• As humans, we have two sets of 23 chromosomes in most of our cells. We inherit one set from each of our biological parents. 
• The combination of inherited genetic information contributes to an individual’s characteristics. It’s why members of a biological family often share similar appearance – such as height, hair colour, and even nose and ear shape. 
• Variations in the genetic information can also cause genetic conditions, which can increase the risk of passing a condition between generations. 
• For example, arthritis, Huntington’s disease and some types of cancer are all conditions that can run in families. 

Genotypes and phenotypes 

• The genotype is the unique genetic makeup of an organism, from their entire genome down to individual variants – or alleles – of specific genes. 
• The phenotype is an organism’s physical characteristics. Most phenotypes are influenced by the genotype, but environmental factors can also play a role. 
• For example, height: the genotype is a combination of more than 700 different genes. The phenotype is a person’s height, which is influenced by these genes and environmental factors – like nutrition during childhood.

How is genetic material inherited?

• Most of our cells contain two sets of 23 chromosomes. This is known as being diploid.
• The exceptions are the egg and the sperm. They only have one set of chromosomes each, known as being haploid.
• During sexual reproduction, the sperm cell combines with the egg cell to form a fertilised egg – the first cell of the new organism. 
• The fertilised egg now has two sets of 23 chromosomes, with one set inherited from each biological parent. It has the complete set of instructions needed to make more cells and eventually develop into a person.

How are sex traits determined?

• A person’s sex traits – such as their genitalia, hormones, reproductive organs – are determined by the sex chromosomes. 
• The sex chromosomes are called the X chromosome and the Y chromosome.
• The egg usually always carries an X chromosome. The sperm usually carries either an X or a Y chromosome. 
• When an egg joins with a sperm containing an X chromosome, the child has an XX genotype and is usually assigned female at birth. 
• When an egg joins with a sperm containing an Y chromosome, the child has an XY genotype and is usually assigned male at birth. 
• Though rare, other combinations of sex chromosomes – such as XXY – are possible. These are known as intersex combinations. At birth, these children are usually assigned the gender that most closely matches their external genitalia.

Our first understanding of inheritance: Mendelian genetics in 1865

• The simplest way that genetic characteristics are passed between generations is through Mendelian genetics – discovered by Gregor Mendel in 1865. 
• He investigated two simple traits in the common pea plant: the colour of the peas (yellow or green), and the texture of the peas (smooth or wrinkly). 
• In the first generation (F1), every pea plant was smooth and yellow. 
• When two smooth, yellow F1 peas were crossed, the result in the second generation was 75% smooth and yellow, and 25% wrinkly and green. 
• This means that the genes that code for smooth, yellow peas are dominant, while the genes that code for wrinkly, green peas are recessive (see image below). 

From his pea plant experiments, Mendel came up with three principles of inheritance: 

• Each trait is determined by a ‘factor’ that is passed onto descendants. We now know these factors are genes. 
• Individuals inherit one ‘factor’ (or gene) from each parent for each trait. 
• A trait might not show up in an individual – but it can still be passed onto the next generation. 

Genetic characteristics that follow Mendel’s principles are called Mendelian. 

• We now know that many of our traits are controlled by multiple genes and other factors in a more complex way than this simple inheritance model.
• However, some genetic conditions are influenced by single genes and can be passed between generations using Mendelian principles. 
• For example, cystic fibrosis is a recessive condition caused by a mutation in the CFTR gene. 

There are many medical conditions caused by changes in a organism's DNA. Find our more on our next Introduction to Genomics page.

KCSE SET BOOKS ESSAY QUESTIONS and ANSWERS

Enjoy free KCSE revision materials on imaginative compositions, essay questions and answers and comprehensive analysis (episodic approach) of the set books including Fathers of Nations by Paul B. Vitta, The Samaritan by John Lara, A Silent Song by Godwin Siundu, An Artist of the Floating World by Kazuo Ishiguro and Parliament of Owls by Adipo Sidang'. This blog is useful to Kenyan students preparing for KCSE; and their teachers.

Tuesday 21 April 2020

70 amazing inheritance study questions and answers, 70  inheritance study questions and answers, short questions on inheritance by david mulwa.

• He freezes salaries
• Imposes 100 percent tax on all corporations (banks, parastatals, business) 
• Imprisons Robert and Goldstein
• Imposes curfew and strict martial law (P 113-114)

19 comments:

wakati am a student at Sosiot girls in kericho and I like your notes and it has help me understand inheritance further ..... thanks so much ..... I hope you visit our school one day

Thanks for the feedback.

Am Abigael at cheborgei girl's, am interested with your notes, indeed they are the best and I hope you come to our School one day. Thanks

Thanks for the comment Abigael. I hope to visit Cheborgei Girls. All the best.

Good work mwalimu

Welcome. Thanks for the feedback.

i thought this was an essay platform but it helped anyways. You forgot to mention the examination fee of 2000 and also movement one takes place 30 years later and not 13 as you said. Good work all the same.

Thanks for the feedback. I have tackled essays on various articles on this blog.

Your articles are spot on,Wekati.They really enhance the understanding of the set text.

It would be nice if you visited Baringo and take us through essay writing on inheritance

I would love to visit Baringo on such a mission. Thanks for the comment.

I have understand inheritance long time suching about this I appreciate you for good work.Nile road student

Thank you for the feedback.

Thanks alot for the notes they are thumbs up

what is the significance of comparing the natives with the zebra

Share your feedback with Wekati now

Featured Post

Essay: silent song kcse essay questions and answers.

A SILENT SONG AND OTHER STORIES ESSAY QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ©Wafula Wekati   Share A SILENT SONG ESSAY QUESTION When someone ...

Heredity and the Different Types of Inheritance Essay

• To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
• As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
• As a template for you assignment

All living beings are able to pass on certain features and characteristics to their descendants. It is the ability due to which scholars explain the similarity between the child and his parents called human heredity, the discovery of which was primarily attributed to Gregor Mendel (Muehlenbein 48).

At the same time, child’s qualities, peculiar to each of the parents, are manifested differently. For example, the child may outwardly resemble the father, but his behavior would be transferred from his mother. It occurs because there are two types of genes – dominant and recessive (Emery and Emery 43). The first of them would appear in the course of a child’s development by inhibiting the action of the latter. Heredity reflects on man’s mental and physical development. However, one cannot judge the potential of the child only according to his parents. It is possible that the child would inherit the dominant qualities of one of the remote ancestors. In this sense, it goes without saying that heredity and inheritance topic applies to real life playing an important role as for genetics as well as for every man. One of the interesting studies of inheritance is drawing a family tree. It allows following the dominant features in related entities within a few generations in each particular family. From a practical point of view, such study is very significant to identify the different transmitted diseases as a result of the influence of heredity on human. Therefore, it is achievable to develop methods for diagnosis and prevention of possible pathology in some cases. Let us take the following example. There is a married couple. The woman has a recessive gene responsible for predisposition to diseases of the respiratory system. If this gene interacts with a man with a dominant gene, both features would be presented in the genetic code of their child, but the gene of the respiratory system diseases would be suppressed by the dominant gene of a man. As a result, the disease would not manifest itself in a child with a high probability.

It should also be noted that inheritance represents the process of the genetic trait from a parent to offspring. There might be several types of human inheritance among which dominant-recessive, incomplete dominance, co-dominant, sex-limited, and sex-influenced are. The bright example of a sex-influenced inheritance is baldness. “Two of every three American men will develop some form of balding,” states Chiras (350). The other example is skin color that has a genetic basis as “more that 100 gene products are involved in the synthesis of melanin, and the formation and deposition of melanosomes” (Starr, Evers, and Starr 204).

In the recent research, Jablonka and Raz distinguished so-called epigenetic inheritance that is “the inheritance of developmental variations that do not stem from differences in the sequence of DNA” (132). For instance, the impact of living conditions in early childhood reflects the picture of epigenetic modifications and accompanies the person for all his life. Moreover, a new study provided by specialists of the Zurich University (Switzerland) helps to clarify the situation with the epigenetic inheritance. Gapp et al. studied the molecular mechanisms of inheritance behavior in mice. In order to do this, they caused animals’ childhood trauma: they were taken away from their mothers during two weeks at a time (Gapp et al. 667). This unpredictable stress influenced both cubs and females who were also imprisoned for a time in a close tube. According to the research, when the stressed cubs grew, the researchers noticed that they were indifferent to the danger: for example, they were less afraid of open and well-lit spaces (normal mouse, of course, is to avoid such places) (668). However, precisely speaking, changes in behavior and metabolism were inherited by their descendants as well. Therefore, some epigenetic features might be inherited by offspring.

In conclusion, heredity and inheritance occur as an integral and substantial part of all living creatures.

Chiras, Daniel D. Human Biology . 7th ed. Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning, 2012. Print.

Emery, Alan E. H., and Marcia L. H. Emery. The History of a Genetic Disease: Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy or Meryon’s Disease . 2nd ed. New York: Oxford UP, 2011. Print.

Gapp, Katharina, Ali Jawaid, Peter Sarkies, Johannes Bohacek, Pawel Pelczar, Julien Prados, Laurent Farinelli, Eric Miska, and Isabelle Mansuy. “Implication of Sperm RNAs in Transgenerational Inheritance of the Effects of Early Trauma in Mice.” Nature Neuroscience 17.1 (2014): 667-69. Print.

Jablonka, Eva, and Gal Raz. “Transgenerational Epigenetic Inheritance: Prevalence, Mechanisms, and Implications for the Study of Heredity and Evolution.” The Quarterly Review of Biology 84.2 (2009): 131-76. Print.

Muehlenbein, Michael P. Human Evolutionary Biology . Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2010. Print.

Starr, Cecie, Christine A. Evers, and Lisa Starr. Biology: A Human Emphasis . 8th ed. Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning, 2011. Print.

• Nature versus Nurture: the Simple Contrast
• Epigenetics and Its Role in Cancer Detection and Prevention
• Genetics: the Erroneous Concept of Blending Inheritance
• Genetic Engineering Using a Pglo Plasmid
• Genetic Diseases: Sickle Cell Anemia
• Maple Syrup Urine Disease Pathogenesis
• Genetically Identical Twins and Different Disease Risk
• Ethical Issues Behind Feeding People With GMOs
• Chicago (A-D)
• Chicago (N-B)

IvyPanda. (2022, April 17). Heredity and the Different Types of Inheritance. https://ivypanda.com/essays/heredity-and-the-different-types-of-inheritance/

"Heredity and the Different Types of Inheritance." IvyPanda , 17 Apr. 2022, ivypanda.com/essays/heredity-and-the-different-types-of-inheritance/.

IvyPanda . (2022) 'Heredity and the Different Types of Inheritance'. 17 April.

IvyPanda . 2022. "Heredity and the Different Types of Inheritance." April 17, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/heredity-and-the-different-types-of-inheritance/.

1. IvyPanda . "Heredity and the Different Types of Inheritance." April 17, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/heredity-and-the-different-types-of-inheritance/.

Bibliography

IvyPanda . "Heredity and the Different Types of Inheritance." April 17, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/heredity-and-the-different-types-of-inheritance/.

Essay on Inheritance

Students are often asked to write an essay on Inheritance in their schools and colleges. And if you’re also looking for the same, we have created 100-word, 250-word, and 500-word essays on the topic.

Let’s take a look…

100 Words Essay on Inheritance

What is inheritance.

Inheritance is like a gift from our parents and ancestors. It’s not just about money or houses, but also about looks, talents, and health. When a family member passes away, their belongings are passed on to the living relatives. This is called inheriting.

Types of Inheritance

There are two main types: genetic and cultural. Genetic inheritance gives us traits like eye color from our parents. Cultural inheritance includes language, traditions, and knowledge that are handed down through generations.

Importance of Inheritance

Inheritance is important because it connects us to our past and shapes who we are. It can provide security in the form of property or wealth, and it can also remind us of where we come from through family traditions and stories.

250 Words Essay on Inheritance

Inheritance is like a gift passed down from parents to their children. It’s not just about money or houses, but also about the color of your eyes, the shape of your nose, and how tall you grow. These gifts are called genes, and they come from both your mom and dad.

Why Inheritance Matters

Inheritance is important because it connects us to our past and shapes who we are. Your great-grandmother’s wedding ring or your grandfather’s watch are not just things; they tell a story about where you come from. Similarly, having your mother’s smile or your father’s laugh makes you part of a bigger family story.

Learning from Inheritance

Inheritance is not just about getting things; it’s also about learning. Family stories, skills, and knowledge are all part of what you can inherit. Knowing how to cook a special family recipe or understanding the language your grandparents spoke are treasures that come from inheritance.

In summary, inheritance is a mix of the physical traits and material things we get from our families. It’s a bridge to our history and a guide for who we might become. It’s a special way that families share their lives across generations.

500 Words Essay on Inheritance

Inheritance is like getting a gift from your family, but it’s not the kind you unwrap on your birthday. It’s the traits or characteristics you get from your parents, like your mom’s blue eyes or your dad’s talent for singing. These traits are passed down through genes, which are like tiny instruction books inside every cell of your body. They tell your body how to grow and what to become, whether it’s tall like your uncle or good at running like your sister.

The Science Behind Inheritance

The reason you might look or act like your parents is because of something called DNA. DNA is a long, twisty ladder inside your cells that carries your unique code. This code is made up of four different chemicals, which pair up to form the rungs of the DNA ladder. The order of these pairs is what makes you, you! When a baby is made, it gets half of its DNA from its mother and half from its father, mixing together to create a brand new code.

What Can You Inherit?

Inheritance is not just about genes.

It’s not all about what’s in your genes, though. You also inherit things from your family that aren’t written in your DNA. This includes stuff like your language, your family’s traditions, or how your family celebrates holidays. These are things you learn from being around your family, not things that are passed down through genes.

Not Everything is Inherited

It’s important to remember that not everything about you comes from your parents. There are lots of things that can change the way you grow up, like where you live, the friends you make, and the things you learn at school or in your neighborhood. These experiences can shape you just as much as your genes do.

Why Understanding Inheritance is Important

In conclusion, inheritance is a fascinating part of what makes you unique. It’s a mix of your parents’ genes, the things you learn from your family, and your own life experiences. It’s like a recipe that combines ingredients from all over to make you who you are. And just like any recipe, the outcome is special every time.

That’s it! I hope the essay helped you.

Happy studying!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Inheritance Cycle: Inheritance

INTRODUCTION

Author fails, bad narration, bad dialogue, stuff stolen from other works, plot issues: ridiculously predictable events, plot issues: contradictions and plot holes, plot issues: nonsense and contrived events, my personal commentary.

• Faculty of Arts
• The Australian Centre
• Projects, Publications and Resources

Root and Branch: Essays on Inheritance

Webinar summary and key themes

A collaboration between the Australian Centre and NewSouth Books

12 th July 2022

Join Associate Professor Lorenzo Veracini in conversation with author Eda Gunaydin to celebrate the release of Root & Branch.

I have come to see that I am an argumentative person who is frequently convinced that my angle, my take, on a matter, is the right one. This kind of delusional self-belief is not rewarded in many other spheres of social life, so I write essays - Eda Gunaydin

There is a Turkish saying that one’s home is not where one is born, but where one grows full – doğduğun yer değil, doyduğun yer. Exquisitely written, Root & Branch unsettles neat descriptions of inheritance, belonging and place. Eda Gunaydin’s essays ask: what are the legacies of migration, apart from loss? And how do we find comfort in where we are?

Presenters: 

Eda Gunaydin is a Turkish-Australian essayist and researcher whose writing explores class, capital, intergenerational trauma and diaspora. You can find her work in the Sydney Review of Books, Meanjin, The Lifted Brow and others. She has been a finalist for a Queensland Literary Award and the Scribe Nonfiction Prize. Root & Branch is her debut essay collection.

Associate Professor Lorenzo Veracini is an Honorary Senior Fellow at the Australian Centre and teaches history and politics at Swinburne University of Technology. His research focuses on the comparative history of colonial systems and settler colonialism as a mode of domination. He has authored Israel and Settler Society (2006), Settler Colonialism: A Theoretical Overview (2010), The Settler Colonial Present (2015), and most recently The World Turned Inside Out: Settler Colonialism as a Political Idea (2021). Lorenzo co-edited The Routledge Handbook of the History of Settler Colonialism (2016), manages the settler colonial studies blog, and is Founding Editor of Settler Colonial Studies.

• Form 1 Mathematics Notes
• Form 2 Mathematics Notes
• Form 3 Mathematics Notes
• Form 4 Mathematics Notes
• Form 1 Mathematics Topical Questions and Answers
• Form 2 Mathematics Topical Questions and Answers
• Form 3 Mathematics Topical Questions and Answers
• Form 4 Mathematics Topical Questions and Answers
• Form 1 Functional Writing Notes
• Form 2 Functional Writing Notes
• Form 3 Functional Writing Notes
• Form 4 Functional Writing Notes
• Poetry Notes
• Grammar Notes
• Oral Literature Notes
• Oral Skills Notes
• Guide to Blossoms of the Savannah Summarized Notes - Easy Elimu
• A Doll's House
• The Pearl Study Guide
• Memories We Lost and Other Stories Study Guide
• Inheritance Study Guide
• A Silent song and Other Stories Guide
• Fathers of Nations Guide
• An Artist of the Floating World Guide
• The Samaritan Guide
• Sarufi na Matumizi ya Lugha
• Isimu Jamii Notes
• Fasihi Notes
• Ushairi Notes
• Mwongozo wa Kuandika Insha
• Tumbo Lililoshiba na Hadithi Nyingine
• Mwongozo wa Kigogo
• Mwongozo wa Chozi La Heri - Chozi la Heri Notes PDF
• Mwongozo wa Bembea ya Maisha - Bembea ya Maisha Notes PDF
• Mwongozo wa Nguu za Jadi
• Mwongozo wa Mapambazuko ya Machweo na Hadithi Nyingine
• Biology Form 1 Notes
• Biology Form 2 Notes
• Biology Form 3 Notes
• Biology Form 4 Notes
• Biology Essays
• Form 1 Biology Topical Revision Questions and Answers
• Form 2 Biology Topical Revision Questions and Answers
• Form 3 Biology Topical Revision Questions and Answers
• Form 4 Biology Topical Revision Questions and Answers
• Form 1 Chemistry Notes
• Form 2 Chemistry Notes
• Form 3 Chemistry Notes
• Form 4 Chemistry Notes
• All Chemistry Practicals Notes for KCSE and MOCKS
• Form 1 Chemistry Topical Revision Questions and Answers
• Form 2 Chemistry Topical Revision Questions and Answers
• Form 3 Chemistry Topical Revision Questions and Answers
• Form 4 Chemistry Topical Revision Questions and Answers
• IRE Form 1 Notes
• IRE Form 2 Notes
• IRE Form 3 Notes
• IRE Form 4 Notes
• Physics Form 1 Notes
• Physics Form 2 Notes
• Physics Form 3 Notes
• Physics Form 4 Notes
• CRE Form 1 Notes
• CRE Form 2 Notes
• CRE Form 3 Notes
• CRE Form 4 Notes
• Geography Form 1 Notes
• Geography Form 2 Notes
• Geography Form 3 Notes
• Geography Form 4 Notes
• History Form 1 Notes
• History Form 2 Notes
• History Form 3 Notes
• History Form 4 Notes
• Business Studies Form 1 Notes
• Business Studies Form 2 Notes
• Business Studies Form 3 Notes
• Business Studies Form 4 Notes
• Home Science Form 2 Notes
• Home Science Form 3 Notes
• Home Science Form 4 Notes
• Home Science Form 1 Notes
• Agriculture Form 1 Notes
• Agriculture Form 2 Notes
• Agriculture Form 3 Notes
• Agriculture Form 4 Notes
• Agriculture KCSE 2019 Project
• Computer Studies Form 1 Notes
• Computer Studies Form 2 Notes
• Computer Studies Form 3 Notes
• Computer Studies Form 4 Notes
• KCSE 2017 Reports
• 2018 Pre-Mocks
• 2019 Pre-Mocks
• 2022 Pre Mocks
• 2021/2022 Pre-Mock Past Papers
• 2023 Pre Mocks
• 2017 Mock Past Papers
• 2019 Mock Past Papers
• 2020 Mock Past Papers
• Mock Exam Papers 2021/2022 - Easy Elimu
• Mock Exam 2022 Questions and Answers
• Alliance Boys High School
• Maranda High School
• Form 1 Past Papers
• Form 2 Past Papers
• Form 3 Past Papers
• Form 4 Past Papers
• 2019 KCSE Prediction Papers
• 2020 KCSE Prediction Papers
• 2021 KCSE Prediction Papers
• 2022 KCSE Prediction Questions and Answers - EasyElimu
• KCSE Prediction 2023
• 2020 Post Mock Past Papers
• 2021/2022 Post Mocks
• 2023 Post Mocks
• Play Group: Activities, Homework and Syllabus
• 2023 PP1 Exams
• 2023 PP2 Exams
• Grade 1 Notes
• 2023 Grade 1 Exams
• Grade 2 Notes
• 2023 Grade 2 Exams
• Grade 3 Notes
• 2023 Grade 3 Exams
• Grade 4 Notes
• 2023 Grade 4 Exams
• Grade 5 Notes
• 2023 Grade 5 Exams
• Grade 6 Notes
• KPSEA Exams
• 2023 Grade 6 Exams
• Class 6 : Notes, Revision Papers and Syllabus
• Class 7 : Notes, Revision Papers and Syllabus
• Class 8 Notes
• 2023 Class 8 Exams
• 2023 Kcpe Prediction
• Grade 7 Notes
• 2023 Grade 7 Exams
• Form 3 Term 3 End Term 2022
• Form 2 Term 3 End Term 2022
• Form 1 Term 3 End Term 2022

Trending (7 New)

• The New EasyElimu Website
• 2024 Pre Mock Exams
• Fathers of Nations PDF Notes and Quizzes
• The Samaritan PDF Notes and Quizzes
• A Silent Song and Other Stories PDF Notes and Quizzes
• Parliament of Owls Guide PDF Notes and Quizzes
• An Artist of the Floating World PDF Notes and Quizzes

Themes - Guide to the Inheritance Play by David Mulwa

« Previous Topic Setting and Title - Guide to the Inheritance Play by David Mulwa

Next Topic » Language and Style (Stylistic Devices) - Guide to the Inheritance Play by David Mulwa

Authoritarian and Oppressive Leadership

Interracial conflict and revolution, poverty and despondency, misrule and greed, superstition, betrayal, assasination, embezzlement, corruption and mismanagement of the economy, leadership conflict, political sacrifice, hopelessness and despair, disillusionment, imperialism, freedom and liberation.

• In the prologue the authoritarian and oppressive leadership of the colonialists in Kutula is portrayed.
• Mulwa portrays the colony of Kutula as one under the harsh rule  of Governor Thorne who is apparently angry with the colonial  office that has abolished whipping the natives. He is displeased  with the colonial officer in London for his advocacy on simulated  humanitarianism  for declaring the whip as obsolete. He says,  "The fool drinking coffee in London while I mollycoddle natives .  they down their tools and nothing gets done. " (page 3)
• The Governor mistreats and abuses the native black servant and  calls the attendant, a  "dithery idiot"  and regards him as impudent  and then compares him to common animals. His leadership is  excessively zealous and humiliating.
• A conflict has ensued between the Africans and their white  masters over land, leadership and resources. The Whiteman has  been robbing  the Africans of their valuables and exporting them  to his motherland.
• King Kutula XV takes displeasure in the apparent inheritance and  insists that natives must share what comes from their land. It is  clear that in case of a revolution, the British Empire stands to lose  in the event that the natives take over governance. This is  because  "Africa supports the empire... " (p.4).
• Melissa's disinterest in the ritual in scene one of movement two is basically because Lacuna has chosen Lulu, a nineteen-year-old school going girl, as the messenger. He is set to get intimate with her in the process.
• International business practice between Kutula and imperialists, which has no human face, is putting pressure on both Lacuna and the citizens and working to the detriment of the welfare of Kutula. Residents have to be evacuated from their homes to pave way for agriculture, salaries have to be slashed, people have to be retrenched and more income has to be generated at the expense of the people.
• Lacuna declares martial law, declares a dusk to dawn curfew, freezes salaries and fires people en-masse and continues to detain Lulu, and issues a shoot on sight order for thieves and looters
• It is demonstrated by the reprisal  and escalating violence between the natives and white settlers.  The natives destroy the White's property and molest their children  and women.
• The author brings out the conflict of attitude where the white  settlers consider themselves civilized, democratic and  modernized. They also claim to have brought change through  education, hospitals, roads, churches, employment to the  primitive, ignorant and ungrateful natives.
• However, Kutula insists that just as a beetle carries its house on  its back whether stinking or not, the natives will govern  themselves despite their ignorance and inability.(pg 11)
• There is a revolution as people overthrow their leader. A successful coup is staged where the palace is surrounded and Lacuna taken hostage by the people and for the people. They  declare,  "... united in a single just cause, we, by our own effort, can raise ourselves up again... " (p. 133)
• The natives are bitter.
• Tamina's bitterness is born of the miseries she has been through, brought by Kutula's poor leadership marred by greed and dictatorship.
• She is bitter with Bengo whose role as an activist plunged her family in misery.
• Her husband is exiled, her sons are away in search of jobs and her daughter is in and out of school due to lack of school fees.
• The natives are living in fear. There is fear of being assassinated in case one falls out with the leader. Bengo is nearly killed for fighting  Lacuna's leadership.
• Judah Zen Melo goes into self- exile  for fear of being killed out of disobeying Lacuna.
• Tamina says,  "You must sit on the right side of Leader Lacuna... if you are to live." (pg. 21 )
• Sangoi takes up the appointment as a minister for fear of being killed by Lacuna.
• Lacuna thrives on nepotism. He rewards sycophants and clansmen leaving most qualified citizens unemployed.
• Those that are employed are poorly paid and overtaxed. Zen says, "...it pays to know the leader's tribesmen" (pg. 34  ).
• Tamina still lives in her old grass-thatched hut.
• She wakes up before cock-crow to pick coffee beans far from home.
• She has to walk fifteen kilometers to fetch water from Bukelenge Mountains.
• Has only two acres of land left after Chipande buys her land for peanuts to start his monopoly of growing coffee.
• Lulu is sent home for school fees balance of two thousand shillings. Tamina has no money. The leaders have told the people that there are "no free things" and they should ' tighten your belts."(pg.27)
• Seen through the leaders. Lacuna demands unyielding loyalty from his subjects.
• He wants his spokesman, Judah Zen Melo, to kill his own brother, Bengo, who is the leader's thorn in the flesh.
• Judah is almost killed for disobeying Lacuna. Bengo is jailed for many years.
• Lacuna is preoccupied with helping his clansmen and has little regard for Kutula citizens.
• Children are sent away for school fees for the school to erect a  perimeter fence, construct a computer laboratory and pay for the teachers' extra work when residents lack water and basic needs.
• Melissa and Sangoi's criticism of Lacuna's crown indicates a disapproval of leadership and a lack of respect and support for him.   "...The crown does not fit him..." (p . 55). "...It is lop-sided on his head..." (Pg. 55)
• Lacuna and his leaders demonstrate insatiable greed. They grab every available chance to steal from the state. Lacuna and his cronies embezzle billions of shillings advanced as loans leaving white elephant projects and industries that have suffered dire mismanagement.
• Lacuna uses part of the loans to buy himself an aircraft and he abdicates the management of the money to his cronies who share it  ravenously. (He demands for certain percentages for  personal use from every loan advanced). Goldstein describes these cronies as " ... a greedy bunch of incompetents who can't see a dime without getting libidinous convulsions down their midriff?" (pg 76)
• It is because of greed that Lacuna falls prey to Goldstein's mission of eliminating his father.
• The author demonstrates the superstitious traditional practices of commemorating the departed leaders in Kutula. The current leader is given the mandate to lead, by the youth, after the performance of a ritual. "...Our ancestors demand that our youths give us mandate to lead them to their future..." (p.53)
• Traditions demand that the dead must not be offended. " ..lf our fathers would have us share the same platform..." (p. 55) . The displeasure of the dead can be unbearable to the living.
• Lacuna's faith in the superstitions pegged on the yearly ritual of uniting the powerful dead and the unborn children remains his only hope of sustaining his leadership position by making the midnight sacrifices of political perpetuation.
• Evident through Robert who not only undermines the natives but is also sickened by their way of life. He cannot stand their customs and their nauseating suffocating loyalty of  "...crawling on the floor... fawning... mothering..."(p.60)
• Lacuna kills his own father to take over leadership in Kutula. It is an act of betrayal, assassination. He claims that his father ran down the country and needed to pay up with his life. 
• The state has betrayed its own. Zelo dies with the effort to increase the production of silver to meet the conditions of the imperialists yet the state won 't protect its own with the right working conditions
• Betrayal of loyalty is seen when Chipande disowns Lacuna and says that his role as adviser was overruled by his orders.
• Lacuna and his leaders  grab every available chance to steal from the state. Lacuna and his cronies embezzle billions of shillings advanced as loans leaving white elephant projects and industries that have suffered dire mismanagement.
• Lacuna uses part of the loans to buy himself an aircraft and he abdicates the management of the money to his cronies who share it ravenously.
• They have run down the country to shambles
• The author depicts the leadership conflict between Sangoi and Lacuna resulting from the issue of evacuation of the occupants of the Bukelenge valley to "re-organize our land and boost production." (p. 84).
• Lacuna begins to experience the opposition of the opinion leaders who disagree with his request to have them convince the residents "as to our national reasons for such a move" (p.85).
• Starts when Bukelenge occupants organize a  peaceful march to the palace carrying doves. Not even the army can disperse or hurt the women and children because they are harmless. "They carry twigs and farm tools instead of guns!" (p.91 ).
• The occupants of Bukelenge are portrayed as peaceful and harmonious. They all agree to express their grievances just as  their leaders advice and direct them, peaceful and bloodless.
• The news of Zelo's death creates the atmosphere of hopelessness and despair. The straws of hope that Tamina had left are all gone. Zen Melo's death is a mark of her imminent misery.
• Patriotism is portrayed by Sangoi who insists upon Bengo to ensure that 'no life is lost' in their protest mission against Lacuna's leadership.
• Bengo also shows patriotism when he fights the government's dictatorial rule that oppresses the citizens. He is jailed for years and now that he is back, he vows to  "take up the fight where I left off." (pg.22) .  He is  optimistic in that after being jailed for years, he returns ready to continue the fight hoping to liberate the people.
• Lacuna is desperate and disillusioned as everything is working against him. Lulu won't give in to Lacuna; Robert and Goldstein clear his foreign accounts to pay the accruing debt; citizens are against his leadership and the silent ones are about to unleash their wrath on him setting him up för desperation. He makes desperate moves.
• Robert and Goldstein effect their threat after their failure to meet the conditions and the impact trickles down to the citizens. Evacuation will affect them, by emptying Lacuna's accounts, all organizations will be taxed by  100%. Robert is aware that Judah was murdered in the mine; the whites seemingly know the nitty- gritty of Lacuna's administration. They are in control. "It was murder for poor Judah..."(p. 109).
• It is evident that the leaders are determined to bring change in Kutula. Bengo says they are ready for any eventuality . "If we lose, posterity will know that at least we died saying, "no" to tyranny . . . if we win, we shall rejoice ... know ... we are a united people." (pg.125 )
• The change in Kutula is not only the responsibility of the leaders but every citizen's concern. Unity of purpose is evident as the elderly leader says, "And we've been joined by millions from all ethnic groups and religious faiths" (pg.124). Bengo reports that, "many are with us right across ... the land." (pg.125).
• The need for change is motivated by the continuous predicament  the natives have faced over time. They are landless and servitude, "A mad hatter continues to sell us out-slaves on our own soil." (pg.123) , unemployed, "...look at me waiting here for all my education. Me! A graduate." (Pg.123) among others.
• Freedom and liberation come to the people when the austere leader is taken hostage.

Download Themes - Guide to the Inheritance Play by David Mulwa .

Why download.

• ✔ To read offline at any time.
• ✔ To Print at your convenience
• ✔ Share Easily with Friends / Students

Related items

• Inheritance by David Mulwa - KCSE Essay Questions with Answers
• Plot Summary - Guide to the Inheritance Play by David Mulwa
• Characters and Characterisation - Guide to the Inheritance Play by David Mulwa
• Language and Style (Stylistic Devices) - Guide to the Inheritance Play by David Mulwa
• Setting and Title - Guide to the Inheritance Play by David Mulwa

access all the content at an affordable rate or Buy any individual paper or notes as a pdf via MPESA and get it sent to you via WhatsApp

What does our community say about us?

Join our community on:.

• KCSE Revision Questions
• Privacy Policy
• Mobile App Privacy Policy
• High Schools in Kenya
• Teacher Resources
• Questions and Answers
• Online Tuition and Classes in Kenya

Copyright © 2022 EasyElimu

English Literature revision notes, resources and analysis.

• Poems of the Decade Example Questions
• Poems of the Decade Teaching Resources
• Love Poetry Through The Ages Revision
• Edexcel Relationships Poetry – GCSE Revision
• Interpreture Quizzes
• About Interpreture
• Interpreture Feedback
• Credits and Acknowledgements
• Privacy Policy

Thank you to our Patreon Supporters

Jessica D, Edward A, Peter C, Ayo A, Liz K, Matthew C, Lily B, Julia M, Amy S, Norma M, Amelia D, Lynn C, Joan B.

• Toggle the search field

Inheritance – Poem Analysis

‘Inheritance’ by Irish poet  Eavan Boland explores ideas surrounding inheritance and what is passed on to new generations, whether this be physical items or skills and knowledge. Boland was born in Dublin in 1944, and has found focus in writing having first published work when only a student. She often focuses on Irish women in history and culture, and overall Irish identity, and her work has earned high praise. This has included President Obama quoting lines from ‘On a Thirtieth Anniversary’ in a 2016 St Patrick’s Day speech.

This poem is no longer part of the set of prescribed poems that could be included in the Edexcel English Literature exam, however it is still useful for practice as an unseen poem. This poem was examined in the 2017 AS Level Exam.  Click here to see a full list of revision notes for the examined poems.

Interpreture gives ‘Inheritance’ a difficulty rating of 2, meaning that it is relatively straightforward to understand and analyse. The meaning is very clear in this poem along with the different key themes. While the language and structure are both slightly more challenging, there are still a range of techniques that are able to be identified by most students and analysed to a good standard.

‘Inheritance’

Although only a single word, it has wide range of connotations which immediately go about informing a reader of the likely subject of this poem. They are likely to correctly assume that the poem deals with the subject of inheritance, but the lack of additional detail provided encourages a reader to begin to think with the same mindset that the poem explores – specifically the concept of what  can be inherited? This idea is supported by the opening line of the poem, which helps the reader continue this thought process with the initial confirmation, and is likely to make them more receptive to ideas in the rest of the poem.

Poem Structure

A notable element of the structure of this poem is the range in line lengths, with lengths up to fifteen words or as short as three. This helps to show a very varied rhythm and pace because of the somewhat confusing contribution to the layout of the poem, encouraging a reader to feel confusion, but also recognise that this varied layout and structure can be seen as showing the varied way in which society, culture and parents all pass on different things as part of an inheritance.

Working in conjunction with the varied line length technique is enjambment and varied stanza lengths, which are also very important for creating an uneven structure and rhythm that demonstrates the varied nature of life and inheritances. To a certain extent the length of stanzas feels cynical because the poem opens and closes with two-line stanzas. However, there are still breaks to this cycle with a two-line third stanza and three-line seventh stanza. In any other poem this would be the key factor which makes it feel varied, but the shifts in line length overshadows these changes, so it acts as a supporting factor rather than a defining factor. The flow of lines across stanzas through enjambment is also particularly noticeable for the shorter lines, where the flow is much more apparent, which could be interpreted as showing the cycles and flows of life and society.

The lack of rhyme scheme in this poem can be interpreted as demonstrating a lack of control and ownership, making a reader feel powerless to spot patterns in the text, and therefore mirroring the ideas of inherited items and knowledge often being uncontrollable, or at least unpredictable. Many poems will have a set rhyme scheme to show similarity, persistence and expectation, so the lack of a rhyme scheme in ‘Inheritance’ can be seen to show the opposite.

Poetic Techniques

The use of pronouns and determiners is a key part of this poem because it helps to show personal connections and experiences, highlighting their importance to the concept of inheritance. Specifically, the frequent use of “I” demonstrates the extent of the personal connection and how the narrator’s own experiences have shaped how they see the world today and what they wish to pass on to their children. While there is a use of “them” to describe the narrator’s children, they are also referred to with the possessive determiner “my”. Some readers may interpret this as showing ownership, however it is more likely to be understood as a feeling of responsibility by having raised them.

Ideas of geography and history are also included to further highlight the personal nature of the poem. For example, there is reference to the “Three Rock Mountain” which is just outside of Dublin, supported by ideas of “island of waters”. This helps to place the poem within a ‘homely’ setting as it is Boland’s home country. Similarly, references to historical context are important such as traditional “silver” and “silk” which demonstrate the importance of inheritance throughout history. There is also a general sense and understanding of shifts in societal attitudes too, such as the description of the “ground” being stood on, and how it was never really the narrator’s. This could be seen as a link to how up until 1870, anything a married woman owned would become her husbands, who would then legally have control of it, showing how previously women would have little ability to provide a specific inheritance.

It is also interesting to consider the change in tone that takes place at different stages throughout the poem. It starts relatively wondering, before shifting to sadness and regret, before returning to pride. This mix of emotions would once again help the poem to feel very personal and therefore is likely to have a greater impact on a reader as they will feel the situation is more realistic, and could potentially happen to them.

Important Lines

“It might not ever be theirs.”

Using “might” in this phrase is important because it adds a feeling of uncertainty to the situation, showing the complete unknown of life after someone passes, and the inability to know what is to come or how best to help in a situation. The link to ownership of property is also notable as it is becoming a key issue among younger generations today.

“to make the nothing … into something”

The contradicting imagery and ideas of these lines in the fourth stanza is very important for demonstrating the development of the rights of women, and how they have previously had to rely on giving an inheritance from practically nothing – this could be seen as introducing the idea of transferring knowledge and natural skills.

“I must have learned that somewhere.”

The idea of natural skills is fully considered at the end of the poem, with the imperative “I must” at the beginning of the final sentence helping to provide a reassuring tone. However, while reassuring and showing a deeper level of understanding, it could also be interpreted that there is a sense of regret still present.

‘Inheritance’ Key Themes

• Identity:  The theme of identity is very important, as this is the idea that ‘Inheritance’ is built around, both in terms of the poem and also the concept itself within society. The poem explores the different forms of inheritance which could contribute to forming an identity, whether that be land and setting or items or knowledge.
• Gender:  Motherhood as a part of gender is another key concept, as the poem specifically looks at what a mother can pass on to her children. The absence of fathers could be interpreted by some readers at helping to make the poem feel more delicate and emotive (through traditional expectations).
• Society and Culture:  The geographical and historical references are an important way that the societal conditions and factors are brought into the poem. This makes it feel more important to a reader, and may encourage them to consider how society may affect them in relation to inheritance.

Quick Focus Questions

• At what point is the shift in tone most effective? Include analysis to support your idea.
• Why is the varied structure so important in the poem?
• Consider the way that different forms of ‘property’ are explored throughout the poem – how is this effective for a reader?

The way in which ‘Inheritance’ considers the impact of societal views on individuals would likely appeal to a range of readers, and it is clear that readers with similar personal experiences would find it very emotive. The ideas explored in this poem link well to others such as ‘Effects’ and ‘Out of the Bag’ in terms of passing on ideas, but also ‘You, Shiva and My Mum’ and ‘The Fox in the National Museum of Wales’ for the idea of sharing context and culture.

Related Posts

Out of the Bag – Poem Analysis

Genetics – Poem Analysis

On Her Blindness – Poem Analysis

Effects – Poem Analysis

• $ 0.00 0 items

Genetic inheritance

Genetic inheritance is a basic principle of genetics and explains how characteristics are passed from one generation to the next.

Genetic inheritance occurs due to genetic material, in the form of DNA, being passed from parents to their offspring. When organisms reproduce, all the information for growth, survival, and reproduction for the next generation is found in the DNA passed down from the parent generation.

Much of our understanding of inheritance began with the work of a monk by the name of Gregor Mendel. His experiments and ‘Laws of Inheritance’ provide the foundations for modern genetics.

In sexual reproduction, the genetic material of two parents is combined and passed on to one individual. Although the offspring receives a combination of genetic material from two parents, certain genes from each parent will dominate the expression of different traits.

Gregor Mendel

Mendel is accredited as the first person to correctly understand the process of how characteristics are inherited by offspring from parents. Before Mendel, many other incorrect hypotheses attempted to explain how characteristics and traits were passed from generation to generation. The most commonly accepted theory was the ‘blending theory’ which proposed that the traits of parents were blended together and an intermediate trait was expressed in the offspring. Mendel’s work on the common pea plant proved that was not the case.

Mendel’s experiments

Mendel performed a series of rigorous experiments that looked at 7 different characteristics (e.g. flower color, seed color and seed shape), each with 2 different traits (e.g. purple flower and white flowers).

He established true-breeding lines for each characteristic. For example, one line of plants would produce only purple flowers and another only white. He then crossed individuals with two different traits to see the resulting trait of the offspring over three generations.

In his observations, Mendel found that in the first generation of offspring only one of the traits was ever expressed (e.g. purple flowers). After crossing the first generation of offspring with each other, Mendel found that approximately 75% of the second generation inherited the same trait as their parents (i.e. the purple flowers of the first generation of offspring). The remaining 25% expressed the second trait of the original parents (e.g. white flowers), the trait that appeared to be lost in the first generation of offspring.

Mendel’s conclusions

Following three generations of cross-breeding Mendel produced three significant conclusions regarding genetic inheritance. His first conclusion was that each trait is passed on unchanged to offspring via ‘units of inheritance’. These units are now known as ‘alleles’.

Mendel’s second conclusion, offspring inherit one allele from each parent for each characteristic. His third and final conclusion was that some alleles may not be expressed in an individual but can still be passed on to the next generation.

Mendel’s Laws of Inheritance

• Law of Segregation – The alleles for each character segregate during gamete production so that each gamete will only have one of the two alleles for each gene.
• Law of Independent Assortment – Pairs of alleles for each characteristic/gene segregate independently of each other.

Mendel’s work has been heavily built upon over the past 150 years and the field of genetics has come a long way since his pea experiments. His work set the foundation for our understanding of genetic inheritance in animals, plants and other complex organisms.

The process of inheritance is hugely important for understanding the complexity of life on Earth, in particular for its role in sexual reproduction and evolution . For this, Mendel’s contributions to science, biology and genetics are still widely recognized and applauded within the scientific community.

Alleles, genotype & phenotype

Alleles and genotypes are important foundations of genetics. An allele is a particular form of a gene and they are passed from parents to their offspring. A genotype is the combination of two alleles, one received from each parent.

The physical expression of a genotype is called the phenotype. The specific combination of the two alleles (the genotype) influences the physical expression (the phenotype) of the physical trait that the alleles carry information for. The phenotype can also be influenced by the environment

An allele is a particular form of one specific gene. When Gregor Mendel completed his experiments on peas he was crossing different traits of one characteristic, such as flower color.

Genetically, the variation in traits, e.g. purple flowers or white flowers, is caused by different alleles. In most cases in the plant and animal world, individuals have two alleles for each gene; one allele is inherited from their father and the second from their mother.

Depending on which alleles an individual has received will determine how their genes are expressed. For example, if two parents have blue eyes and pass the blue-eyed alleles onto their children, their children will also possess the alleles for blue eyes.

The genotype is the genetic combination of two alleles. If, for example, a child has received one brown-eye allele – represented by ‘B’ – and one blue-eye allele – represented by ‘b’ – then their genotype would be ‘Bb’. If, however, the child received two brown-eye alleles their genotype would be ‘BB’, and a child with two blue-eye alleles ‘bb’.

As previously mentioned, the brown-eye allele is dominant over the blue-eye allele so a child with the genotype ‘Bb’ would, in theory, have brown eyes, rather than blue or a mix between the two. Genotypes with two alleles that are the same, i.e. ‘BB’ and ‘bb’, are known as homozygous genotypes and genotypes with two different alleles are known as heterozygous genotypes.

The physical appearance of the genotype is called the phenotype. For example, children with the genotypes ‘BB’ and ‘Bb’ have brown-eye phenotypes, whereas a child with two blue-eye alleles and the genotype ‘bb’ has blue eyes and a blue-eye phenotype. The phenotype can also be influenced by the environment and sometimes certain alleles will be expressed in some environments but not in others. Therefore two individuals with the same genotype can sometimes have different phenotypes in they live in different environments.

Definitions:

• Gene – a section of DNA that contains the genetic material for one characteristic
• Allele – a particular form of a gene. One allele is received from each parent
• Genotype – the combination of the two alleles that are received from an individual’s parents
• Phenotype – the physical expression of the gene which is determined by both the genotype and the environment
• Heterozygous – a genotype with two different alleles
• Homozygous – a genotype with two of the same alleles

Punnet Squares

Last edited: 31 August 2020

Want to learn more?

This is world’s #1 textbook for beginning biologists and has been hugely valuable to me over the years. This is the resource that I recommend above anything else for aspiring biologists.

eBook - $2.95

Also available from Amazon , Book Depository and all other good bookstores.

What does DNA stand for?

Know the answer? Why not test yourself with our quick 20 question quiz

Your browser is ancient! Please upgrade to a different browser to experience this site.

• Skip to content
• AustLit home
• Advanced search
• About / Contact
• Member Home
• Editing Mode
• Public Mode
• Subscriber Management
• Add New Work
• Add New Agent
• Add New TAL Unit
• Delete This Record
• Undelete This Record
• Merge Record
• See Recent Changes
• Download as PDF
• LOG IN WITH YOUR LIBRARY CARD
• Log in as a different user: User login form User name Password

• Author: agent Eda Gunaydin
• EDIT/CONTRIBUTE ADD HEADER INFO
• Abstract text
• Publication Details ( 1 )
• Issues ( 20490974 )
• Works About (6)
• Find Library Holdings on Trove

Latest Issues

Abstract history archive description.

'There is a Turkish saying that one’s home is not where one is born, but where one grows full – doğduğun yer, doyduğun yer. Mixing the personal and political, Eda Gunaydin’s bold and innovative writing explores race, class, gender and violence, and Turkish diaspora – both in Australia and round the world – in her compelling debut.

'Equal parts piercing, tender and funny, this book takes us from an overworked and underpaid café job in Western Sydney, the mother-daughter tradition of sharing a meal in the local kebab shop, a night clubbing with Turkish students, to the legacies of family migration, and intergenerational trauma within a history of violence and political activism.

'For readers of Ta-Nehisi Coates and Durga Chew-Bose, Eda Gunaydin seeks to unsettle neat descriptions of migration and diaspora. How should we address a racist remark on the 2AM night ride bus? What does the Turkish diaspora of Auburn in Western Sydney have in common with Neukölln in Berlin? And how can we look to past suffering to imagine a new future?' (Publication summary)

Publication Details of Only Known Version Earliest 2 Known Versions of

• Publisher: NewSouth Publishing
• Published July 2022

Works about this Work

'What could be more humiliating than to write and be read, to be thought about and perceived by strangers? And then the worst: to be dissected, publicly and openly, for all the things we dedicated ourselves as teenagers to hiding? Time and time again, it strikes me that the worst thing that can ever happen to an author is for people to read their book. That’s when they start to think about it, write about it, ask about it, talk about it, and eventually give it back to the author, chewed up, wet and slobbery like a tennis ball out of a dog’s mouth.'  (Introduction)

'In every piece of writing, I am always looking for that moment that forces me to put the words down, close my eyes and take a deep breath. A single moment of reflection that allows me to appreciate what the author is saying, but also why they are saying it. In Eda Gunaydin's 'Root and Branch', I found that moment in the essay titled 'Kalitsal'.' (Introduction)

'Eda Gunaydin’s collection of essays,  Root & Branch , centres on migration, class, guilt, and legacy. It joins the surge of memoir-as-début by millennial writers, who interrogate the personal via the political. Gunaydin, whose family immigrated to Australia from Turkey, grew up in the outer suburbs of Western Sydney – home to a historically migrant and working-class demographic. We learn that her father, a bricklayer, has been the household’s sole income provider as the health of her mother, Besra, meant that she ‘never had a job in this country except cleaning’. Gunaydin meanwhile accepted off-the-books employment in hospitality and retail until she was able to ‘crack into a white-collar position’ at the university where she is completing her PhD. This left her hyper-conscious of intergenerational mobility and class disparity. She worries about what it means ‘to instantly unlock an easier life … while others continu[e] to struggle’. Those others being, namely, her family, whose Blacktown postcode means limited access to adequately funded essential services, reliable public transport, and affordable housing. It is a concern driving much of the book – how to reconcile gratitude with guilt, particularly when Gunaydin cannot divorce the opportunities available to her in life from her family’s sacrifices.' (Introduction)

• Turkish people  
• Western Sydney , Sydney , New South Wales ,

Email Alert

Information.

Inheritance

The ABC's of buying a house in rapidly gentrifying Portland, Oregon

A is for apple. Two of them in the yard, stunted and blackened. We peer at them in the January chill, trying to determine if they’ll flower and fruit come spring. Or maybe they’re cherries. They’re knobby trees, all elbows. It’s hard to tell.

B is for bedroom.  We’re getting two of them: one master and one little one that would be perfect for a little one. In the meantime, it will be my office. No pressure, jokes the realtor.

C is for cherries.  It turns out they are cherries after all.

But C is also for choices. We have them: we could have lived farther out, way out, in a bigger house, or closer in toward the city center in a condo or crappier house. Instead, we’ve settled in the middle, a block away from a strip of used car lots and a block away from a lovely park, teetering between them on some bizarre socioeconomic fulcrum: just right.

D is for deal-breaker.  When the seller accepted our offer on this little bungalow, with its double lot and peeling yellow paint, we checked our list. It had been hanging up for eight months: our requirements for a future home, scrawled in Magic Marker on butcher paper and tacked to the door. On the list were three categories: must-haves, would-likes, and deal-breakers. A decent kitchen was a must-have. A yard with trees, a would-like. There were only a few deal-breakers: not on a super busy street and not too far out from city center.

We realize, now that we’ve made an actual offer on an actual house, that we had no idea what we were doing when we made that list. It was formed of gut feelings and quotes from TV shows and things we’d heard our parents say. But when you’re a lifelong renter, how can you know what to ask for? How can you know what will break the deal, or whether you yourself—your person, your credit score—will break it first? Not every deal-breaker, I guess I’m saying, is a choice.

E is for escrow.  Like the cloud, but for your money. It floats, suspended, somewhere unknowable and unreachable and neutral, until closing. Like a lawsuit, homebuying is full of legal terms. I have a master’s degree, but I have difficulty understanding all the jargon. I joke to my realtor that if she can give me the basics in ghazal form, forward me the contract in couplets, I’ll understand it better. She smiles, but it doesn’t reach her eyes. The word escrow floats in my mind, suspended, meaningless, like a mask detached from the face it’s supposed to cover.

F is for friends,  many of whom encouraged us to get into the housing game before we were priced out of Portland. You have to bid over, they told us; those techies from California are moving north and buying up all the houses close in. This was true; Portland, Oregon, has been called the most gentrified city of the century and is fast becoming a destination for tech workers and startups displaced by San Francisco’s rising costs.

If you don’t buy now, you’ll have to live way out, and then we’ll never see you, our friends said. There was often something difficult in the tone that was hard for me to parse out. It wasn’t that the market was so hot we wouldn’t be able to buy; the problem was that we wouldn’t buy in the right place. We’d be priced out of our class. We’d take a stumble, land in a less savory neighborhood. Even if we were happy with our bungalow, we’d be separated from our friends in a more difficult, more adult way than ever before: they would be much richer than us. Because I grew up with these people, made communal chili pot beans in our early twenties, drank cheap beer, took the bus, rode our bikes, scraped it together, we had always been on equal terms. Now, though, they would live close in, and we would live out. Our friends assumed that we deserved to live in a cozy, quaint old Portland neighborhood with big trees because that’s the social class we exhibit in other ways: we’re educated, we’re foodies, we subscribe to The Atlantic . It was the second part of the assumption—you’ll have to live way out, and then we’ll never see you—that hurt. What it meant was that if we chose to live in certain places, we would be invited in, but they would not come out to us.

G is for the G.I. Bill,  which allowed soldiers returning from Midway or the battlefields of France to take out low-interest home loans. As the forties bled into the fifties and America continued to suburbanize, veterans bought real estate and claimed their little piece of the American dream. Because of the bill, millions of veterans could train for new jobs, enroll in higher education, and buy homes.

However, because it relied on local officials to enforce it, “thousands of black veterans . . . were denied housing and business loans,” according to a New York Times review of Ira Katznelson’s study When Affirmative Action Was White . In New York and northern New Jersey, Katznelson writes, “[F]ewer than 100 of the 67,000 mortgages insured by the G.I. Bill supported home purchases by nonwhites.” In other words, by not explicitly protecting black veterans from discrimination, the G.I. Bill left them vulnerable to it.

The G.I. Bill was written nearly eighty years ago and has been extended several times, most recently to help veterans pay for education in STEM fields. Another version, the Post-9/11 G.I. Bill, provides a basic housing allowance to veterans attending school. Although extension bill benefits can now be claimed by all eligible veterans, the history of American home-buying has a more complicated story. Once you have some property, it’s easier to accumulate wealth; if your family didn’t buy it eighty years ago, it’s harder to have it now. “With legacies of slavery and the Civil Rights era, African Americans are kind of latecomers to the wealth accumulation game,” says Princeton sociologist Dalton Conley in the Society Pages. Another sociologist, Karyn Lacy, adds that this was “in part because financing a dream home has involved different processes for white home seekers than for blacks.”

H is for house,  which we had inspected for problems when our offer was accepted. This, too, was an unfamiliar ritual to me. I took a morning off work to follow a man with a toolbelt through the house and listen to him hmmm and ummm as he peered at cracked corners and nosed his way into the crawlspaces. He emerged, dusty and disheveled, looking upset. Nothing pleased him. The more I followed him, the less the house pleased me. It was cracked. It was crumbling. It was on the verge of falling apart. Then he turned to me and said, I’m the bad news guy. I wondered if he took pleasure in it.

I is for inheritance,  which no one in my family ever expected to give. My parents grew up poor but worked their way into being able to afford a nice home. Attuned to how real estate grounds you, literally, in the soil, they wanted to help us put down roots. My husband and I were already in our thirties and had been expats for years; we had no capital to invest, no nest egg we were sitting on. We’d spent what we earned on flights to China, student loans, and interesting “experiences,” which were all completely worth it despite the sarcasm. Let’s get you started, said my parents, and they gave us money to help with our down payment. We didn’t want to accept help at first, thinking we should afford this on our own, until we realized how utterly impossible that was. The truth is, without their gifts we wouldn’t have been able to get into the game at all. We’d still be sitting on the sidelines, quietly saving. Looking at deal-breakers. My mom said we should think of it as our inheritance.

J is for Joneses, as in keeping up with them.  During our twenties, Hank and I lived abroad, committed bohemians with the coolest Christmas cards. When we hit thirty, we returned to Oregon, but it was awkward because, while we were away, our friends had gone ahead and kept living. Most of them owned houses and had babies; they had new friends we didn’t know, and new jobs, and they greeted us like cousins they hadn’t seen for a really long time. After we moved back, it was fun to talk about next steps, so I downloaded the Redfin app. Then I deleted it and downloaded the Trulia app. Then I deleted that and re-downloaded Redfin. Every time someone asked, I told them, Yes, we’re looking, although all that meant was that when I went on jogs, I checked the prices of the houses around me on my apps, marveling at how tens of thousands turned to hundreds, despairing at how we’d ever possibly afford anything except our month-to-month rent. My friends asked, Why don’t you ever invite us over to your apartment, and I’d say, Oh, it’s just an apartment. It’s too small to have guests. Which wasn’t true. I’d say, Let’s go to your house. It’s better for that sort of thing.

K is for kitchen.  Ours will be small but full of light, with wood countertops and a 1950s stained-glass lamp hanging over the basin sink. I can see myself spending time here, mopping the tile floors, chopping vegetables with a glass of red beside the cutting board. It’s a vision that will never come to fruition in its entirety; I have few domestic inclinations, preferring a life of the mind and grubbing in the outdoors to anything that even possibly resembles housewifery. My mother is a self-taught cook who opened two restaurants in Hawaii, and I hope to make a new culinary start in this house, but let’s be honest: I didn’t inherit that gene.

L is for landing zone.  A map of Portland in The Oregonian shows me areas most prone to gentrification. Where we live now, in our apartment, is bright purple, which means “vulnerable populations have been largely priced out.” I’ve seen the big new luxury apartments going up on the corners, and I know that means rent hikes are coming. Our future neighborhood, where we are buying our bungalow, is a misleading goldenrod yellow. This means the area is a “landing zone,” where “rising numbers of poor Portlanders, ethnic minorities, and people with lower education levels than the citywide average” are moving to escape inner-city gentrification. One must-have item on our butcher-paper list was “racial and socioeconomic diversity,” so I am rather fiercely proud to be moving to a landing zone, to land among different languages and cultures and pay grades. But, of course, my husband and I, white and educated, could also be the first wave that pushes out our neighbors; we could be the vanguard. We could be purpling our new neighborhood without wanting to.

M is for mortgage,  which is not pronounced how it’s spelled. Ours will take thirty years to pay; I will be sixty-three when we finally own our home. Sixty-three is also approximately the percentage of Americans who own a home, though the number varies a bit each year. However, home ownership numbers are shifty: 74 percent of white Americans, but only 43 percent of black Americans, own homes.

N is for neighborhood,  and in homeownership, there are “good” and “bad” neighborhoods. Such designations, though casual in conversation, are based on real factors like crime rate, access to grocery stores, walkability, the quality of schools. Disturbingly, however, what sometimes drives down home prices and causes white people to leave is the number of minorities. “Put simply, the market penalizes integration: the higher the percentage of blacks in the neighborhood, the less the home is worth, even when researchers control for age, social class, household structure, and geography,” writes Dorothy Brown, a tax law professor at Emory University, in Forbes .

During the Depression, the Home Owners’ Loan Corporation (HOLC) wrote a profile of the neighborhood where we currently rent. It was increasing in desirability, they wrote, largely because although 20 percent of residents were foreign-born, Italians “were not predominating” and the presence of Negroes and Chinese was “not thought to be serious.”

Our new house rests at the convergence of three neighborhoods: Woodstock, which is tony in a granola way and has a nice organic grocery store; Lents, which is historically one of the most violent neighborhoods in Portland; and Brentwood-Darlington, which is quiet and lower-class. Depending on who I’m talking to, I explain the house’s location differently. Just south of Woodstock, I tell my friends with good jobs and closer-in houses. Near Lents, I tell my students at community college, who mostly live way out. In neither case am I lying, but it feels as if I am in both.

O is for oak.  There’s a big one in the backyard, crippled by winter windstorms and dangling snapped branches over the porch. Hank feels we should get an arborist to trim it, but I like how wild it feels back there, like a thicket in a fairy tale. This may become a source of tension. I can see myself defending the tree, chaining myself to it in coming years. It will acquire outsized symbolism and will scar me deeply when we finally have to take it down.

P is for parents,  who always fought over tree-trimming. My mom hated to prune, and my dad always went out with clippers and sheared off way too much of the trees. It was their biggest ongoing fight. I don’t know what it was really about.

Becoming parents is one of our goals, but it’s hard to think that far ahead sometimes. We have so many chinks to fill with plaster, loose tiles to patch, dandelions to pull. I wonder if we, too, will take on oppositional roles for our children: I will be the one who wants a wild native garden, full of climbing roses and overgrown with ferns; Hank the one who goes out periodically with a weed-chopper and chugs through the underbrush, coming inside covered in spatters of green. Will our children look to us for advice on how to trim back the bushes? Will we each represent a different philosophy of householding and spar, predictably and periodically, about the length of the grass? Will we introduce them to the responsibilities of ownership, of understanding and caring for the things you purchase?

Q is for questions,  of which I have many. What the fuck is an amortization schedule? Why would anyone create such a terrible word, with all those hard, sharp sounds in it and the root mort , as in mortality , buried in the word like a secret grave? Will we die in this house? Will we be able to afford to die in this house? Is it right that I have a house when I really couldn’t afford the down payment—that is, without the generosity of family, whose wealth passes through generations, whose love sometimes takes the form of dollars, whose pluck and hard work and eligibility for government programs in the last century means we’ve been able to save enough so Hank and I can have a fight over an oak?

R is for reparations,  “by which I mean the full acceptance of our collective biography and its consequences . . . the price we must pay to see ourselves squarely,” Ta-Nehisi Coates writes in The Atlantic . If black Americans have been unable to enter into government programs, or have been denied throughout history the ability to accumulate family wealth, then how will they afford a down payment? How can anyone possibly do this without help, much less in the face of deliberate harm?

I search for my new neighborhood on Mapping Inequality, a website that collects old documents to show how HOLC evaluated credit-worthiness and mortgage-default risk between 1935 and 1940. The area was deemed “definitely declining” and not ripe for home loans. HOLC notes four Japanese families in the area. It notes “no evidence of increasing desirability.” It notes that “infiltration of subversive races [is] a threat.”

When we talk about reparations, it’s not like giving up something earned to someone who didn’t earn it, Coates argues. Simply, the families who were not allowed to take out good government loans should be able to draw that money now. After all, time itself has been a kind of loan. Our Depression-era economy borrowed from families of color to “stabilize and even resurrect a moribund mortgage market and stagnant home building sector,” the website explains. Reparations says the grace period is over, and further deferment is not an option.

S is for slavery.  At its root, it was a question of ownership. “By erecting a slave society, America created the economic foundation for its great experiment in democracy,” writes Coates. “Like homeownership today, slave ownership was aspirational. . . . Much as homeowners today might discuss the addition of a patio or the painting of a living room, slaveholders traded tips on the best methods for breeding workers, exacting labor, and doling out punishment. Just as a homeowner today might subscribe to a magazine like This Old House , slaveholders had journals such as De Bow’s Review , which recommended the best practices for wringing profits from slaves.”

Slavery was essentially like owning a home in that it set you up financially. The slaves were the down payment on a future, a way of planning for your grandchildren’s success with human lives.

This many years later, it is hard to trace it: the institutions, the legislation, the wealth that stemmed from our country’s foundational economic structure. Still, I think this collective home, our land, deserves an inspection. I think we should duck into the crawlspaces of national memory and root around with a flashlight. I am unsure how stable such a structure really is.

T is for toddler.  By the time we have one (our realtor says), this house will start to “feel small.” We’ll want to start thinking about reselling. It’s too early to worry about a second home, I think; we don’t have a kid. We don’t even have the first home yet. And yet I’m already feeling acquisitional, my mind in the game. Where will we move next, I wonder? Would two toddlers be able to share that second bedroom? One at a time, Hank jokes. But I want someone to pass this all on to. I want to sit out front under the cherry trees in April and throw handfuls of their paper-white petals at each other, calling yours , yours , yours .

U is for uncertainty,  from which Hank and I both suffer. We take turns wanting to back out. I stay up one night, staring out the apartment windows, looking at the glitter of lights from the reservoirs and the veterans’ hospital up on the hill. Hank comes in to find me. He wraps me in a blanket and asks what’s wrong. I say I’m worried we can’t do this, unsure if I mean financially or emotionally or what, but just wanting to voice this large, undefined blankness in my head—the swirl of unfamiliar vocabulary, the pressure of making decisions about major plumbing repairs when I’ve never fixed a leaky faucet, the sense of helplessness that has overtaken me just when I am supposed to feel most empowered. He helps me back to bed. A few days later, while grading papers on the couch and watching Top Chef reruns, he has a panic attack. He wants to move abroad again, sell everything and live out of a backpack. We can’t do this, he tells me as I stroke his hands and remind him it’s an investment in our future. Besides, I remind him, if everything goes wrong, we can move in with my folks.

V is for Vanport.  Before the vets came home, before the G.I. Bill, when America was deep in World War II, Portland became a center for shipyard construction. Workers flocked to the jobs, and the state housed temporary workers—many of them people of color—in the nation’s largest wartime housing development, Vanport, so called because it lay along the Columbia River between Portland and Vancouver, Washington. Oregon was a big Klan capital, and the whites here didn’t take kindly to a large influx of people of color, no matter how much we needed to defeat the Nazis. After the war, many of the white workers left Vanport, but people of color, unable to find housing in Portland, remained in larger numbers. In 1948, heavy rainfall and meltwater caused Vanport’s dike to fail. Ten-foot waves burst through the dike and rushed into what was still a city of nearly 20,000 people. As a direct result of losing their homes, black folks settled in Northeast Portland, including my parents’ neighborhood, which was, at the time, what we would now call a “landing zone.”

W is for white flight.  When my friends and I talk about “good neighborhoods” and “good schools,” we are speaking financially. It’s just practical. We have to take care of our pocketbooks. But Hank and I privately commit, speaking in fierce, defiant tones, to send our (not yet existing) kids to public schools and always build community wherever we are. We will support integration. We will not flee. We will stay in our new gold neighborhood. This is an easy defiance, for now, because we are not wealthy enough to live in the purple.

X marks the spot:  Our landing zone. This is where we will land. We close on the bungalow in two weeks. The repairs are in progress. The plumbing is being fixed. The foundation is being reinforced. Sometimes I drive by it at night just to take a look and remember what it is we’re purchasing, our little slice of the American dream. I idle outside the house like a stalker until the neighbor gives me a weird look. I wave. I feel awkward. I want to belong.

Y is for yes.  I walk around one not-terribly-frigid January day to get a feel for the neighborhood. There are some rusty cars parked on lawns, for sure, and also some basketball hoops. At the end of the block are some townhouses. I see an older couple taking out their trash, speaking Mandarin. I greet them in that language, and we all smile at each other. Do you live around here? they ask me. Yes, I say proudly. Yes, I do.

Z is for zoning.  In the early 20th century, my new Mandarin-speaking neighbors would have been barred from my parents’ neighborhood under an exclusion clause for Chinese people. Other types of zoning are more subtle; for instance, redlining was a practice that rated neighborhoods according to their stability. Housing bureaus could assign green lines to an area, which meant it “lacked ‘a single foreigner or Negro,’” writes Coates; people who lived in that area would be offered good loans. If a neighborhood was assigned red lines, residents would find home insurance hard to come by.

None of this history appeared on our butcher paper list. None of the problematic zoning practices are listed in the Redfin app. Before I became a homeowner, redlining and white flight and landing zones were abstractions, things I read about in magazines. Now they are my neighbors. My choices. My cherry trees. What I did not realize is that buying my slice of the American Dream came with a responsibility of knowing the history of my land.

Now I know my . . . I want to sing to my someday-child in the yard. I want to tell him our neighborhoods are red as ripe apples, ripe as spring cherries, green as the maple leaves spreading their thin fingers over our lawn. I want to tell him. But, instead, I will hold his hand under the blossoms and tell him, This is your inheritance.

Journal of Interdisciplinary History of Ideas

Home Varia 15 Reviews Literature on Inheritance: A Summ...

Literature on Inheritance: A Summary of What Can Be Learnt

The routines and progressions that have shaped the inheritance in human societies received extensive scholarly consideration. Studies in this field have explored and investigated the impact of legal and traditional rules of property transmission on the structures of the society and the models of political power. This review is not aimed as an exhaustive evaluation of the extant literature. Rather, it focuses on illustrating the diversity of the proposed explanations and draws some conclusions on what can be learnt.

Index terms

Keywords: .

1 The routines and progressions that have shaped the inheritance in human societies received extensive scholarly consideration. Studies in this field have explored and investigated the impact of legal and traditional rules of property transmission on the structures of the society and the models of political power. In an oversimplified manner the inheritance literature can be characterized as an analysis of the default rules and can be divided scholastically into two large bodies: 1) theory-based explanations and evaluations of the inheritance routines, and 2) empirical data-based models. This review is not aimed as an exhaustive evaluation of the extant literature of these two narrative strands. Rather, it focuses on illustrating the diversity of the proposed explanations and draws some conclusions on what can be learnt.

2 Theory-based inheritance arguments are sparse and scattered in the political and economic literature. Most references start from analysing the inheritance default rules in relation with what was considered a just society. The summary of these views shows relatively little variation in the highlighted arguments. Broadly, the contributors have proceeded either from an impersonal perspective or from a more ideological one to justify maintenance or change of inheritance default rules. Adam Smith, David Ricardo, and Alexis de Tocqueville proceeded rather analytically and found that inheritance rules are the variables that have the potential to change or preserve society and political power. Smith observes in his An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations that “When land was considered as the means, not of subsistence merely, but of power and protection, it was thought better that it should descend undivided to one”(Smith 1776, III.ii/4). Ricardo analyses the tax system and gives economic arguments against the state intervention in inheritance rules since taxing wealth transfer from one generation to the next “will inevitably fall on capital; since by doing so, they impair the funds for the maintenance of labour, and thereby diminish the future production of the country” (Ricardo 1817, 190). Tocqueville when scrutinizing the American society compares rather detached the consequences of the laws of inheritance: “When framed in a particular manner, this law unites, draws together, and vests property and power in a few hands: its tendency is clear aristocratic. On opposite principles, its action is still more rapid; it divides, distributes, and disperses both property and power” (Tocqueville 1838, 30).

3 Jeremy Bentham, John Stuart Mill, and Karl Marx proceeded more ideologically and stated that inheritance rules are the variables than need to be changed in order for have a better society. Legitimacy of intergenerational wealth transfers, economic growth and social stability are the arguments brought about by these authors. For example, Bentham argues against absolute rights to property based on ‘natural law’ and proposes a more utilitarian approach to inheritance: “Whatever power an individual is, according to the received notions of propriety, understood to possess in this behalf, with respect to the disposal of his fortune in the way of bequest—in other words, whatever degree of power he may exercise, without being thought to have dealt hardly by those on whom what he disposes of would otherwise have devolved—that same degree of power the law may, for the benefit of the public, exercise once for all, without being conceived to have dealt hardly by anybody, without being conceived to have hurt anybody, and, consequently, without scruple: and even though the money so raised would not otherwise have been to be raised in the way of taxes” (Bentham, 1795, 12-13). In the first chapter of Principle of Political Economy , John Stuart Mill considers that “What rights, and under what conditions, a person shall be allowed to exercise over any portion of this common inheritance, cannot be left undecided. No function of government is less optional than the regulation of these things, or more completely involved in the idea of civilized society”(Mill 1848, 797). For Karl Marx (1848) one of the ten planks in the coming classless society is the abolition of all rights of inheritance.

4 Empirical data-based inheritance literature tends to be less normative and more focused on data and model building. This scholarship can loosely fit into two strands of narratives. On the one hand there are endogenous explanations, where the different inheritance routines are considered as optimal property transfer policies aimed to maximize the probability of family, dynasty, or social class survival, or as strategies that ended up in producing the nuclear family, or to play down rent seeking among descendants, or as mechanisms to preserve/distribute wealth in the family, or as patterns that perpetuate poverty at individual level, or as sources of legal systems. On the other hand there are the exogenous explanations, where the property transfer practices are considered as mechanisms established to enforce or generate equality in the society, to generate societal change, or as causes for being enfranchised or losing the right to vote in the census vote era. Both strands have theoretical and methodological dimensions. Both strands have accounts that focus on macro- and micro- social and political phenomena. Contributions to both strands come from various sub-fields of social science. As a caveat, let it be remarked that the endogenous-exogenous typology is an academic model used here with the sole purpose of emphasizing particular differences between the logic proposed, in most cases not explicitly, by the various pieces of literature that are scrutinized.

5 Allegedly, at the foundation of the endogenous explanations are those anthropologists who—in the late 19 and the first half of the 20 century—undertook to account for the early social and political structures or to theorize kinship designs in different societies (Bell 1932; Calhoun 1932; Drucker 1939; Elton 1886; Fei 1939; Geary 1930; Kinnosuké 1912; Lotka 1929; MacLeod 1923; Mair 1931; Mateer 1883; Murray 1915; Parsons 1943; Pettengill 1913; Torday 1931; Wright 1903). These studies expound models where primogeniture or partible routines are linked to the family structure. Some models hypothesize primogeniture as optimal succession policies to maximize the probability of lineage survival and preserve wealth (Drucker 1939; Mair 1931; Murray 1915; Wright 1903), in other models the absence of strict primogeniture was essential to lineage survival (Schultz and Richmond 1911), while others postulate property partition as an instrument to encourage the break of extended family relations and to encourage the nuclear version (Parsons 1943). Ethnography and social-history scholarship following in this path nuanced the models and provided more data and case studies (Ammar 1954; Bowles; Smith and Mulder 2010; Bunzel 1952; Eglar 1960; Goody, Thirsk and Thompson 1976; Hechter and Bruste 1980; Kennedy 1953; Lockridge 1968; Kivelson 1994; Lancaster 1958; Jacobson 2002; Mayer 1960; Mencher and Goldberg 1967; Mendels 1976; Miller 1952; Mulder, George-Cramer, Eshleman and Ortolani 2001; Muller 1985; Orenstein 1965; Plakans 1975; Roden and Baker 1966; Rosenfeld 1968; Sanders 1949; Sørensen 1996; Stirling 1965). New postulations and models were added. A number showed that inheritance rules, especially partible routines, influences rent seeking strategies among descendants (Campbell 2005; Lehfeldt 2000; Faith, Goff and Tollison 2008), while another stream pinpointed the connection between both primogeniture and partible property transfers, wealth preservation and family cycles (Berkner 1972; Childs 2001; Crisologo ‐ Mendoza and Van de Gaer 2001; Ditz 1990; Dooling 2005; Owens 2001). Primogeniture rules prompted highly volatile and competitive contests with respect to the excess of male cadet siblings, who were more likely to embrace military careers and be sent to fight in the colonies, whereas the oldest son would take his role in the metropolitan society and avoid military service (Boone 1986).

6 A corpus of legal studies on inheritance rules and rights has developed analysing how passing from primogeniture to partible routines influenced the set-up and the evolution of legal systems, with a special accent on the ideological rejection of the primogeniture by the early settlers and the influence of the partible customs on the law system of the American colonies (Atkinson 1943; Bordwell 1927; Haskins 1957, 1962; Katz 1977; Lund 2009; Priest 2006). This was paralleled by scholarship showing how long-established practices, especially male primogeniture, in some countries in Africa and Asia, resulted in legal unequal rights between males and female descendants to own and transfer properties (Kameri-Mbote 2002; Rautenbach 2008; Tebbe 2008).

7 Inheritance-rules-centred economics research tries to explain intergenerational wealth allocations and poverty persistence (Davies 1982; Menchik 1979; Mendell 1984; Pryor 1973; Stamp 1926). The main strand in this literature argues for primogeniture as the main mechanism that ensured the preservation of big estates and fortunes and wealth inequities, while partition is seen as the formula that, in an optimistic view, bred and enforced wealth equality and, in a pessimistic view, produced and maintained poverty (Alston and Schapiro 1984; Baker 1964; Blinder 1973; Bohac 1985; Davies 1982; Gagan 1976; Hechter and Bruste 1980; Homans 1937; Huston 1993; Menchik 1980; Perkins 1969; Pryor 1973; Wedgwood 1928). A second important thread in this body of research make causal claims between inheritance rules and migration with both primogeniture and partible routines encouraging migration of siblings either because some have no inheritance to assure their economic survival or because they did not have enough to survive in the existing context (Dike 1982; Homans 1937; Howell 1975; Kasdan 1965; Sánchez-Alonso 2000; Wegge 1998). A third strand emphasized religious reforms in Europe as path depend on the partible inheritance rules that distorted the monopoly of the Catholic Church and princes over resources and created societal instability prone to changes orientate against them (Ekelund, Hébert and Tollison 2002; Fichtner 1989; Hopcroft 1994, 1997). A fourth line in this literature postulates partible customs as tools that prompted the capitalist development. As such, partible inheritance created small holdings that could be easily traded (Bryant 2006; Emigh 2003) and created unsustainable subsistence farms and therefore encouraged peasants to move away from agricultural economy (Bryant 2006; Hagen 1988; Hopcroft 1994; Houston and Snell 1984; Kriedte, Medick and Schlumbohm 1982; Thirsk 1961).

8 Connecting both with the legal and economic scholarship is the political science and history research that considers inheritance rules in the context of the polis . This body of literature is split in three concerns: the role of legacy rules in preserving the state/government, and identifying inheritance patterns that could produce political unrest. The first interest conceives primogeniture as optimal property transfer policies aimed to minimize dynastic collapse, to maximize state survival and, to enhance cohesive leadership, particularly in medieval times (Bestor 1996; Geevers 2010; Haskins 1966; Hechter and Brustein 1980, Joffe 1988; Miller 1952) whereas partible rules endangered dynastic reign and most often resulted in state divisions or collapse (Geevers 2010; Hechter and Brustein 1980; Hurewitz 1968; Linehan 2008; Le Patourel 1971; Stewart-Brown 1920; Turner 1995). The second interest posits partible inheritance as a proxy for social instability that ends up in political unrest and societal change (Chasteen 1991; Fennell 1983; Keirstead 1985; Midlarsky 1982, 1988; Scott 1979; Midlarsky and Roberts 1985). The third concern posits partible routines as a proxy to democratization processes in early modern period as division of property encouraged equality in the society and disrupted the social monopoly of the aristocracy therefore promoting social mobility (Bertocchi 2006; Vogel 1989). Following in this path, some studies show that partible inheritance rules favoured the maintenance of centralized bureaucratic governments whereas impartible rules favoured strong and independent aristocracies (Linton 1956; Wittfogel 1957).

9 Adding to the influence of primogeniture and partible inheritance rules in determining the inheritance after-effects, scholars have developed exogenous explanations where the focus is on accounting for changes in property transfer rules as result of changes in other elements of the society. This literature examines how the rules and practices of inheritance have changed in response to political and religious transformations, increasing or decreasing population pressures, economic development and opportunities, urbanization, migration, changing roles of various social categories.

10 Anthropology scholarship is diverse in exogenous explanations. Some studies interpret partible inheritance regulations as the mechanism that produced more individuals with voting rights under the census voting regimes of the 18 and 19 century (Prufer 1928). In the case of some tribal population in Cameroon, the process of Islam regeneration with enhanced definitions of individual rights is considered to have prompted a change inside the partible rules of inheritance of the respective populations (Moritz 2003). Mennonites were flexible in changing from primogeniture to partible and vice-versa as their economic production model reference point oscillated between household and community (Longhofer 1993; Quadagno and Janzen 1987). Industrialization combined with population growth urged lower classes in Japan to adopt male primogeniture (Beardsley, Hall and Ward 1959), whereas the population boom diminished the preference over partible rules in the countryside Turkey, mainly for economic reasons and tendency to preserve agricultural land (Stirling 1965).

11 Historic research in this line shows that the nobility repelled partible rules and endorsed primogeniture for very different practical reasons: for example the need to preserve title and patrimony prompted a move towards primogeniture (Duby 1953; Livingstone 1997), while productivity pressures on their feudums pushed landlords to abolish partible rules (Faith 1966; Goody 1983). The American colonists, arguably for ideological reasons, repudiated the aristocratic primogeniture rule and decided that dividing property among heirs was the best mechanism to generate and maintain equality in the new society (Haskins 1942; Huston 1993; Katz 1977; Orth 1992). In Russia, Peter the Great introduced primogeniture in order to undermine the political and social influence of the noble families’ networks created and maintained on partible inheritance (Farrow 1966). In the Indian region of Awadh, colonial policies and political arrangements with local elites that were implemented in order to secure legitimacy for the British colonial rulers led to changes in favour of primogeniture in the inheritance customs of the taluqdars class (Jassal 1997).

12 The enterprise of tracing the results of the various streams of inheritance literature is a very difficult one. However, students who are interested in the history of inheritance should ask the obvious question: what can be learned from this literature? The answer is multifold. Inheritance literature seems to have little theoretical coherence. Inheritance has been present in the argument of major classical social, economic and political theorists but with relative little importance in the larger context of ideas; Adam Smith, David Ricardo, Alexis de Tocqueville, Jeremy Bentham, John Stuart Mill, and Karl Marx have allocated relatively small attention to the matter, as compared, for example to the problem property and wealth. The arguments and data related to inheritance rules and practices have failed up to now to be incorporated into a political or economic theoretic model. In terms of explanation there are a number of correlations and causal links that could have worked in at particular time and in specific social contexts. Yet, there are no generalizable linear or curvilinear models that could be applied. Even more, similar inheritance practices when applied in different social contexts not always produce similar outputs. Inheritance patterns do not seem to be unilaterally determined by social, cultural, or economic factors. In terms of data on which the explanations are based: although abundant, very rarely there is new empirical evidence that goes contrary to what previous data already showed. Statistical analyses are rather scarce and suffer from lack of comparable and consistent data; almost never historical data can be considered as representative given the way it was collected at specific times; ecological fallacies are hard to avoid.

George Jamesone , The Campbell of Glenorchy Family Tree, 1635, National Galleries of Scotland

https://www.nationalgalleries.org/​art-and-artists/​24093/​campbell-glenorchy-family-tree

Bibliography

Alston, L.J., and Schapiro, M.O. (1984). Inheritance Laws Across Colonies: Causes and Consequences. The Journal of Economic History 44(2), 277-287.

Ammar, H. (1954). Growing Up in an Egyptian Village: Silwa, Province of Aswan . London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Atkinson, T.E. (1943). The Development of the Massachusetts Probate System. Michigan Law Review 42(3), 425-452.

Baker, A.R.H. (1964). Open Fields and Partible Inheritance on a Kent Manor. Economic History Review, New Series 17(1), 1-23.

Beardsley, R. K., Hall, J. W., and Ward, R. E. (1959). Village Japan . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Bell, F.L.S. (1932). A Functional Interpretation of Inheritance and Succession in Central Polynesia. Oceania 3(2), 167-206.

Bentham, J. (1795). Supply without Burthen; or Escheat vice Taxation: Being a proposal for a saving of taxes by an extension of the law of escheat, including strictures on the taxes on collateral succession comprised in the budget of 7 December 1795 . London: J. Debrett.

Berkner, L.K. (1972). The Stem Family and the Developmental Cycle of the Peasant Household: An Eighteenth Century Austrian Example. American Historical Review 77(2), 398-418.

Bertocchi, G. (2006). The Law of Primogeniture and the Transition from Landed Aristocracy to Industrial Democracy. Journal of Economic Growth 11(1), 43-70.

Bestor, J.F. (1996). Bastardy and Legitimacy in the Formation of a Regional State in Italy: The Estense Succession. Comparative Studies in Society and History 38(3), 549-585

Blinder, A.S. (1973). A Model of Inherited Wealth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 87(4), 608-626.

Bohac, R.D. (1985). Peasant Inheritance Strategies in Russia. Journal of Interdisciplinary History 16(1), 23-42.

Boone, J. L. (1986). Parental Investment and Elite Family Structure in Preindustrial States: A Case Study of Late Medieval-Early Modern Portuguese Genealogies. American Anthropologist, New Series 88(4), 859-878.

Bordwell, P. (1927). English Property Reform and Its American Aspects. Yale Law Journal 37(2), 179-210.

Bowles, S., Smith, E.A., and Borgerhoff Mulder, M. (2010). The Emergence and Persistence of Inequality in Premodern Societies: Introduction to the Special Section. Current Anthropology 51(1), 7-17.

Bryant, J.M. (2006). The West and the Rest Revisited: Debating Capitalist Origins, European Colonialism, and the Advent of Modernity. Canadian Journal of Sociology / Cahiers canadiens de sociologie 31(4), 403-444.

Bunzel, R. (1952). Chichicastenango, a Guatemalan Village . Locust Valley, N.Y.: J.J. Augustin.

Calhoun, A.W. (1932). The Early American Family. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 160, 7-12.

Campbell, B.M.S. (2005). The Agrarian Problem in the Early Fourteenth Century. Past & Present 188, 3-70.

Chasteen, J.C. (1991). Background to Civil War: The Process of Land Tenure in Brazil’s Southern Borderland, 1801-1893. Hispanic American Historical Review 71(4), 737-760.

Childs, G. (2001). Demographic Dimensions of an Intervillage Land Dispute in Nubri, Nepal. American Anthropologist 103(4), 1096-1113.

Cooper, J.P. (1978). Patterns of Inheritance and Settlement by Great Landowners from the 15 th to the 18 th Centuries. In Family and Inheritance: Rural Society in Western Europe 1200-1800 , J. Goody, J. Thirsk, and E. O. Thompson (eds). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Crisologo ‐ Mendoza, L., and Van de Gaer, D. (2001). Population Growth and Customary Land Law: The Case of Cordillera Villages in the Philippines. Economic Development and Cultural Change 49(3), 631-658.

Davies, J.B. (1982). The Relative Impact of Inheritance and Other Factors on Economic Inequality. Quarterly Journal of Economics 97(3), 471-498.

Dike, A. A. (1982). Urban Migrants and Rural Development. African Studies Review 25(4), 5-94.

Ditz, T.L. (1990). Ownership and Obligation: Inheritance and Patriarchal Households in Connecticut, 1750-1820. William and Mary Quarterly 47(2), 235-265.

Dooling, W. (2005). The Making of a Colonial Elite: Property, Family and Landed Stability in the Cape Colony, c. 1750-1834. Journal of Southern African Studies 31(1), 147-162.

Drucker, Philip. 1939. Rank, Wealth, and Kinship in Northwest Coast Society. American Anthropologist 41(1), 55-65.

Duby, G. (1953). La Société aux XI et XII siècles dans la région mâconnaise . Paris, Armand Colin.

Eglar, Z. (1960). A Punjabi Village in Pakistan . New York: Columbia University Press.

Ekelund, R.B. Jr., Hébert, R.F., and Tollison, R.D. (2002). An Economic Analysis of the Protestant Reformation. Journal of Political Economy 110(3), 646-671.

Elton, C.I. (1886). Early Forms of Landholding. English Historical Review 1(3), 427-444.

Emigh, R.J. (2003). Economic Interests and Sectoral Relations: The Undevelopment of Capitalism in Fifteenth ‐ Century Tuscany. American Journal of Sociology 108(5), 1075-1113.

Faith, R. L., Goff, B. L., and Tollison, R.D. (2008). Bequests, Sibling Rivalry, and Rent Seeking. Public Choice 136(3/4), 397-409.

Faith, R.J. (1966). Peasant families and inheritance in medieval England. Agricultural History Review 14, 77-95.

Farrow, L.A. (1966). Peter the Great’s Law of Single Inheritance: State Imperatives and Noble Resistance. Russian Review 55(3), 430-447.

Fennell, J. (1983). The Crisis of Medieval Russia 1200-1304 . London: Longman.

Fichtner, P.S. (1989). Protestantism and Primogeniture in Early Modern Germany . New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Fichtner, P.S. (1989). Protestantism and Primogeniture in Early Modern Germany . New Haven, CT; London: Yale University Press.

Gagan, D.P. (1976). The Indivisibility of Land: A Microanalysis of the System of Inheritance in Nineteenth Century Ontario. Journal of Economic History 36(1), 126-141.

Geary, J.A. (1930). The Celtic Family. Primitive Man 3(1/2), 22-31.

Geevers, L. (2010). Family Matters: William of Orange and the Habsburgs after the Abdication of Charles V (1555-67). Renaissance Quarterly 63(2), 459-490.

Goody, J. (1983). The Development of the Family and Marriage in Europe . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Goody, J., Thirsk, J., and Thompson, E.P. (eds.). (1976). Family and Inheritance: Rural Society in Western Europe 1200-1800 . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Habakkuk, H.J. (1955). Family Structure and Economic Change in Nineteenth-Century Europe. Journal of Economic History 15(1), 1-12.

Hagen, W.W. (1988). Capitalism and the Countryside in Early Modern Europe: Interpretations, Models, Debates. Agricultural History 62(1), 13-47.

Haskins, C.H. (1966). The Normans in European History . New York: Norton.

Haskins, G. L. (1942). The Beginnings of Partible Inheritance in the American Colonies. Yale Law Journal 51(8), 1280-1315.

Haskins, G.L. (1957). Law and Colonial Society. American Quarterly 9(3), 354-364.

Haskins, G.L. (1962). The Legal Heritage of Plymouth Colony. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 110(6), 847-859.

Hechter, M. and Bruste, W. (1980). Regional Modes of Production and Patterns of State Formation in Western Europe. American Journal of Sociology 85(5), 1061-1094.

Homans, G.C. (1937). Partible Inheritance of Villagers’ Holdings. Economic History Review 8(1), 48-56.

Hopcroft, R.L. (1994). The Social Origins of Agrarian Change in Late Medieval England. American Journal of Sociology 99(6), 1559-1595.

Hopcroft, R.L. (1997). Rural Organization and Receptivity to Protestantism in Sixteenth-Century Europe. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 36(2), 158-181.

Houston, Rab and K.D.M. Snell. 1984. Proto-Industrialization? Cottage Industry, Social Change, and Industrial Revolution. The Historical Journal 27 (2): 473-492.

Howell, C. (1975). Stability and Change 1300-1700. Journal of Peasant Studies 2,468- 82.

Hsiao-Tung, F. (1939). Peasant Life in China: A Field Study of Country Life in the Yangtze Valley . New York: E. P. Dutton and Company.

Hurewitz, J.C. (1968). Military Politics in the Muslim Dynastic States, 1400-1750. Journal of the American Oriental Society 88(1), 96-104.

Huston, J.L. (1993). The American Revolutionaries, the Political Economy of Aristocracy, and the American Concept of the Distribution of Wealth, 1765-1900. American Historical Review 98(4), 1079-1105.

Jacobson, S. (2002). Law and Nationalism in Nineteenth-Century Europe: The Case of Catalonia in Comparative Perspective. Law and History Review 20(2), 307-347.

Jassal, S.T. (1997). Primogeniture in Awadh: Sociological Implications for Class and Gender. Economic and Political Weekly 32(22), 1255-1264.

Joffe, G. (1988). Morocco: Monarchy, Legitimacy and Succession. Third World Quarterly 10(1), 201-228.

Kameri-Mbote, P.G. (2002). Gender Dimensions of Law, Colonialism and Inheritance in East Africa. Verfassung und Recht in Übersee. Law and Politics in Africa, Asia and Latin America 35(3), 373-398.

Kasdan, L. (1965). Family Structure, Migration and the Entrepreneur. Comparative Studies in Society and History 7(4), 345-357.

Katz, S.N. (1977). Republicanism and the Law of Inheritance in the American Revolutionary Era. Michigan Law Review 76(1), 1-29.

Keirstead, T.E. (1985). Fragmented Estates. The Breakup of the Myo and the Decline of the Shoen System. Monumenta Nipponica 40(3), 311-330.

Kennedy, D.G. (1953). Land Tenure in Ellice Islands. Journal of the Polynesian Society 2(4), 348-358.

Kinnosuké, A. (1912). Can the Chinese Republic Endure. North American Review 195(677), 451-456.

Kivelson, V.A. (1994). The Effects of Partible Inheritance: Gentry Families and the State in Muscovy. Russian Review 53(2), 197-212.

Kriedte, P., Medick, H., and Schlumbohm, J. (1982). Industrialization Before Industrialization (transl. B. Schempp). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lancaster, L. (1958). Kinship in Anglo-Saxon Society: II. British Journal of Sociology 9(4), 359-377.

Le Patourel, J. (1971). The Norman Succession, 996-1135. English Historical Review 86(339), 225-250.

Lehfeldt, E.A. (2000). Convents as Litigants: Dowry and Inheritance Disputes in Early-Modern Spain. Journal of Social History 33(3), 645-664.

Linehan, P. (2008). Spain 1157-1300. A Partible Inheritance . Oxford: Blackwell.

Linton, R. (1956). The Tree of Culture. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

Livingstone, A. (1997). Kith and Kin: Kinship and Family Structure of the Nobility of Eleventh- and Twelfth-Century Blois-Chartres. French Historical Studies 20(3), 419-458.

Lockridge, K. (1968). Land, Population and the Evolution of New England Society 1630-1790. Past & Present 39, 62-80.

Longhofer, J. (1993). Toward a Political Economy of Inheritance: Community and Household among the Mennonites. Theory and Society 22(3), 337-362.

Lotka, A.J. (1929). The Spread of Generations. Human Biology 1(3), 305-320.

Lund, J.M. (2009). The Contested Will of ‘Goodman Penn’: Anglo-New England Politics, Culture, and Legalities, 1688-1716. Law and History Review 27(3), 549-584.

MacLeod, W.C. (1923). On the Significance of Matrilineal Chiefship. American Anthropologist, New Series 25(4), 495-524.

Mair, L.P. (1931). Native Land Tenure in East Africa. Africa: Journal of the International African Institute 4(3), 314-329.

Marx, K. (1848). Manifest der Kommunistischen Partei . London: Gedruckt in der Office der Bildungs-Gesellschaft für Arbeiter.

Mateer, S. (1883). Nepotism in Travancore. Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland 12, 288-306.

Mayer, A. C. (1960). Caste and Kinship in Central India . Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

Mencher, J.P. and Goldberg, H. (1967). Kinship and Marriage Regulations Among the Namboodiri Brahmans of Kerala . Man 2(1), 87-106.

Menchik, P. L. (1979). Inter-generational Transmission of Inequality: An Empirical Study of Wealth Mobility. Economica, New Series 46(184), 349-362.

Menchik, P.L. (1980). Primogeniture, Equal Sharing, and the U.S. Distribution of Wealth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 94(2), 299-316.

Mendell, M. (1984). Social Determinants of Economic Activity: The Economy of Transfer. Journal of Economic Issues 18(2), 401-410.

Mendels, F.F. (1976). Social Mobility and Phases of Industrialization. Journal of Interdisciplinary History 7(2), 193-216.

Midlarsky, M.I. (1982). Scarcity and Inequality: Prologue to the Onset of Mass Revolution. Journal of Conflict Resolution 26(1), 3-38.

Midlarsky, M.I. (1988). Rulers and the Ruled: Patterned Inequality and the Onset of Mass Political Violence. American Political Science Review 82(2), 491-509.

Midlarsky, M.I. and Roberts, K. (1985). Class, State, and Revolution in Central America: Nicaragua and El Salvador Compared. Journal of Conflict Resolution 29(2), 163-193.

Mill, J. S. (1848). Principles of Political Economy with Some of their Applications to Social Philosophy (ed. W.J.Ashley), New York: Longmans, Green and Co.

Miller, E. (1952). The State and Landed Interests in Thirteenth-Century France and England. Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, Fifth Series 2, 109-129.

Moritz, M. (2003). Commoditization and the Pursuit of Piety: The Transformation of an African Pastoral System . Dissertation. University of California at Los Angeles

Mulder, M.B., George-Cramer, M., Eshleman, J.A., Ortolani, A. (2001). A Study of East African Kinship and Marriage Using a Phylogenetically Based Comparative Method. American Anthropologist 103(4), 1059-1082.

Muller, V. (1985). Origins of Class and Gender Hierarchy in Northwest Europe. Dialectical Anthropology 10(1/2), 93-105.

Murray, M. (1915). Royal Marriages and Matrilineal Descent. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland 45, 307-325.

Orenstein, H. (1965). Gaon: Conflict and Cohesion in an Indian Village . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Orth , J.V. (1992). After the Revolution: ‘Reform’ of the Law of Inheritance. Law and History Review 10(1), 33-44.

Owens, A. (2001). Property, Gender and the Life Course: Inheritance and Family Welfare Provision in Early Nineteenth-Century England. Social History 26(3), 299-317.

Parsons, T. (1943). The Kinship System of the Contemporary United States. American Anthropologist 45(1), 22-38.

Perkins, D. (1969). Agricultural Development in China, 1368-1968 . Chicago: Aldine.

Pettengill, S,B. (1913). ‘Vested Rights’: In Rebuttal. North American Review 198(694), 415-418.

Plakans, A. (1975). Seigneurial Authority and Peasant Family Life: The Baltic Area in the Eighteenth Century. Journal of Interdisciplinary History 5(4), 629-654.

Priest, C. (2006). Creating an American Property Law: Alienability and Its Limits in American History. Harvard Law Review 120(2), 385-459.

Prufer, J.F. (1928). The Franchise in Virginia from Jefferson Through the Convention of 1829. William and Mary Quarterly, Second Series 8(1), 17-32.

Pryor, F.L. (1973). Simulation of the Impact of Social and Economic Institutions on the Size Distribution of Income and Wealth. American Economic Review 63(1), 50-72.

Quadagno, J.and Janzen, J. M. (1987). Old Age Security and the Family Life Course: A Case Study of Nineteenth-Century Mennonite Immigrants to Kansas. Journal of Aging Studies 1(1), 33-49.

Rautenbach, C. (2008). Indian Succession Laws with Special Reference to the Position of Females: a Model for South Africa. Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa 41(1), 105-135.

Ricardo, D. (1817). On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation . London: John Murray.

Roden, D., and Baker, A.R.H. (1966). Field Systems of the Chiltern Hills and of Parts of Kent from the Late Thirteenth to the Early Seventeenth Century. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 38, 73-88.

Sánchez-Alonso, B. (2000). Those Who Left and Those Who Stayed behind: Explaining Emigration from the Regions of Spain, 1880-1914. Journal of Economic History 60(3), 730-755.

Sanders, I.T. (1949). Balkan Village . Lexington: University of Kentucky Press.

Schultz, E. and Richmond, B. (1911). The Most Important Principles of Samoan Family Law, and the Laws of Inheritance. Journal of the Polynesian Society 20 2(78), 43-53.

Scott, T. (1979). The Peasants’ War: A Historiographical Review: Part I. Historical Journal 22(3), 693-720.

Smith, A. (1776). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations . London: W. Strahan and T. Cadell.

Sørensen, A.B. (1996). The Structural Basis of Social Inequality. American Journal of Sociology 101(5), 1333-1365.

Stamp, J. (1926). Inheritance as an Economic Factor. Economic Journal 36(143), 339-374.

Stewart-Brown, R. (1920). The End of the Norman Earldom of Chester. English Historical Review 35(137), 26-54.

Stirling, P. (1965). Turkish Village . New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Tebbe, N. (2008). Inheritance and Disinheritance: African Customary Law and Constitutional Rights. The Journal of Religion 88(4), 466-496.

Thirsk, J. (1961). Industries in the Countryside: Essays in the Economic and Social History of Tudor and Stuart England (ed. F.J. Fisher). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tocqueville, Alexis de. (1838). Democracy in America . New York: George Dearborn & Co.; Adlard and Saunders.

Torday, E. (1931). The Things That Matter to the West African. Man 31, 110-113.

Turner, R. V. (1995). The Problem of Survival for the Angevin ‘Empire’: Henry II’s and His Sons’ Vision versus Late Twelfth-Century Realities. American Historical Review 100(1), 78-96.

Vogel, U. (1989). The Land-Question: A Liberal Theory of Communal Property. History Workshop 27, 106-135.

Wedgwood, J. (1928). The Influence of Inheritance on the Distribution of Wealth. Economic Journal 38(149), 38-55.

Wegge, S. (1998). Migration Decisions in Mid-Nineteenth-Century Germany. Journal of Economic History 58(2), 532-535.

Wittfogel, K. (1957). Oriental Despotism . New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Wright, B.E. (1903). Native Races in South Africa. Journal of the Royal African Society 2(70), 261-275.

List of illustrations

Electronic reference

Cosmin Gabriel Marian , “ Literature on Inheritance: A Summary of What Can Be Learnt ” ,  Journal of Interdisciplinary History of Ideas [Online], 15 | 2019, Online since 15 December 2019 , connection on 02 July 2024 . URL : http://journals.openedition.org/jihi/449

About the author

Cosmin gabriel marian.

Political Science Department, Babeş-Bolyai University, Romania, [email protected]

The text only may be used under licence CC BY-SA 4.0 . All other elements (illustrations, imported files) are “All rights reserved”, unless otherwise stated.

Latest issues

Full text issues, the journal.

• About the journal
• Informations for authors

Informations

• Website credits
• Publishing policies

Newsletters

• OpenEdition Newsletter

In collaboration with

Electronic ISSN 2280-8574

Read detailed presentation  

Site map  – Contacts  – Website credits  – Syndication

Privacy Policy  – About Cookies  – Report a problem

OpenEdition member  – Published with Lodel  – Administration only

You will be redirected to OpenEdition Search

A Choice of Inheritance

Self and Community from Edmund Burke to Robert Frost

David Bromwich

Harvard University Press books are not shipped directly to India due to regional distribution arrangements. Buy from your local bookstore, Amazon.co.in, or Flipkart.com.

This book is not shipped directly to country due to regional distribution arrangements.

Pre-order for this book isn't available yet on our website.

This book is currently out of stock.

Edit shipping location

Dropdown items

• Barnes and Noble
• Bookshop.org
• Waterstones

ISBN 9780674127753

Publication date: 09/25/1989

For the last two centuries, literature has tested the authority of the individual and the community. During this time, in David Bromwich’s words, “A motive for great writing…has been a tension, which is felt to be unresolvable, between the claims of social obligation and of personal autonomy. That these had to be experienced as rival claims was the discovery of Burke and Wordsworth. Our lives today and our choices are made in a culture where any settlement of the contest for either side is bound to be provisional. There is nothing to approve or regret in such a situation; it is the way things are; and in a time like ours, it is what great writing lives on.”

With a historical as well as an interpretative emphasis, Bromwich explores this tension. He shows why the public-mindedness of the eighteenth century is as limited a model for readers now as the individualism of the nineteenth century. Calling attention to the ambivalence of the great writers, he cites Emerson’s sense of the conflict between “spirit” and “commodity” and Burke’s conviction that human nature is at once given and chosen. Elsewhere, he describes the attenuation of social concern even in the truest modern followers of the romantics as in the conscious turn away from Wordsworth’s morality in poems by Stevens and Frost. Other topics include Keats’s politics, Whitman’s prose, William Cobbett’s journalism, and the standards of the Edinburgh Review .

In some widely discussed general essays, Bromwich addresses such issues as the uses of biography, the idea that authors create their own worlds, and the political ambitions of recent literary theory. His own criticism is powerfully eclectic, combining history, philosophy, biography, and a subtle awareness of how literature performs its work of implication. He brings to the task an authentic understanding of intellectual culture and the ability to leap from textual detail to cultural observation with an understated grace.

As in his other writing, Bromwich aims to join aesthetic theory and moral thought. He rethinks the relationship between genius and talent, and defines genius in terms of its capacity to bring about change, rather than simply its quality of inward and spiritual uniqueness. His sustained defense here of that conception, and his elegant argument for a new approach to criticism generally, make this thoughtful book a controversial one as well.

Bromwich is one of the very few contemporary writers who combine philosophical sophistication with original views about intellectual history and with remarkable skill at close reading of poems. He is certainly one of the most interesting of contemporary critics. —Richard Rorty

• David Bromwich is Sterling Professor of English at Yale University.

Book Details

• Harvard University Press

From this author

The Intellectual Life of Edmund Burke

Recommendations, shelley and his circle, 1773-1822, volumes 11 and 12.

The Critical Writings of Oscar Wilde

On Not Being Someone Else

When Novels Were Books

Sorry, there was an error adding the item to your shopping bag.

Expired session

Sorry, your session has expired. Please refresh your browser's tab.

Main navigation

An item has been added to the cart

Added to shopping bag

• Copy to clipboard

Set your location

It looks like you're in   . Would you like to update your location?

Unavailable

Harvard University Press titles are not shipped directly to India due to local distribution arrangements.

Unavailable in country .

Shopping Bag

Your shopping bag is currently empty. Add items to your shopping bag, to complete check out.

Jesse Owens: Beyond the Finish Line

This essay about Jesse Owens highlights his extraordinary impact on athletics and society. Born in 1913, Owens defied racial barriers and became a global icon by winning four gold medals at the 1936 Berlin Olympics. His success challenged Nazi ideologies and inspired many. Despite facing racial discrimination in the US, Owens advocated for civil rights, promoting racial integration in sports and beyond. His legacy continues to symbolize resilience, equality, and the power of determination.

How it works

Jesse Owens, titan of track and field, cut an inheritance that crosses a lake athletics achievement, leaving, mark indelible on sport and society. Born in 1913 in Oakville, Alabama, overdose of Owens appeared modest undertaking to become the global icon of resilient and advantages.

The crowning moment of Owens’ came during 1936 Berlin olympic games, where on refused to obey expectations and pedigree warning, concluding the four gilded youths in 100 meters, 200 meters, bruise along long, and relay of 4×100 meters. His exploits not only proposed on his shop-window unprecedented speed and athleticism but and loud reproach delivered concepts do Adolf of Hitler Aryjczyka of advantage, taking world attention and inspiring millions.

Before his Olympic triumphs, Owens registered in State University of Ohio, setting frequent world records and winning numerous university championship. His achievements on track were not straight athletics landmarks but by deep statements against pedigree barriers, toruj?c a road for the future generations of African-American of athletes.

After his athletics mastery, Owens ran into substantial calls in separate America, where pedigree discrimination was penetrating. Without regard to these obstacles, he remained proof in his pursuit of equality, using his platform, to protect for civil laws and challenge of social norms. Courage of Owens’ and totality from track removed his mastery thereon, cementing his status how the symbol of resilient and social progress.

In addition, the action of Owens’ stretched on sport. He fixed the popularity, to move pedigree integration toward athletics and society, upright the marine lantern of hope for data second-rate societies in the whole world. His inheritance, as a pioneer for pedigree equality and example for an imitation for expedient athletes prolongs to philosophize, underlining his patient power of inheritance.

In maintenance, history of life of Jesse Owens’ is a testament to the triumph of human spirit above a misfortune. His trip from poverty to Olympic glory is an example power of obstinacy and talent, what yields to transformation, inspiring individuals, to refuse to obey limits and try for a grandeur. Inheritance of Owens’ serves as too late the remark of importance of courage, totality, and determinations in pursuit of dreams.

Upon completion, the achievements of Jesse Owens’ go beyond medals and records; they present the inheritance of courage resilient, and defences. His operating on sporting and society bits and pieces, deep, serving as patient inspiration, that generations came.

Cite this page

Jesse Owens: Beyond the Finish Line. (2024, Jun 28). Retrieved from https://papersowl.com/examples/jesse-owens-beyond-the-finish-line/

"Jesse Owens: Beyond the Finish Line." PapersOwl.com , 28 Jun 2024, https://papersowl.com/examples/jesse-owens-beyond-the-finish-line/

PapersOwl.com. (2024). Jesse Owens: Beyond the Finish Line . [Online]. Available at: https://papersowl.com/examples/jesse-owens-beyond-the-finish-line/ [Accessed: 2 Jul. 2024]

"Jesse Owens: Beyond the Finish Line." PapersOwl.com, Jun 28, 2024. Accessed July 2, 2024. https://papersowl.com/examples/jesse-owens-beyond-the-finish-line/

"Jesse Owens: Beyond the Finish Line," PapersOwl.com , 28-Jun-2024. [Online]. Available: https://papersowl.com/examples/jesse-owens-beyond-the-finish-line/. [Accessed: 2-Jul-2024]

PapersOwl.com. (2024). Jesse Owens: Beyond the Finish Line . [Online]. Available at: https://papersowl.com/examples/jesse-owens-beyond-the-finish-line/ [Accessed: 2-Jul-2024]

Don't let plagiarism ruin your grade

Hire a writer to get a unique paper crafted to your needs.

Our writers will help you fix any mistakes and get an A+!

Please check your inbox.

You can order an original essay written according to your instructions.

Trusted by over 1 million students worldwide

1. Tell Us Your Requirements

2. Pick your perfect writer

3. Get Your Paper and Pay

Hi! I'm Amy, your personal assistant!

Don't know where to start? Give me your paper requirements and I connect you to an academic expert.

short deadlines

100% Plagiarism-Free

Certified writers