speech on internet in favour

Skip to main content
Skip to secondary menu
Skip to primary sidebar
Skip to footer

A Plus Topper

Improve your Grades

Debate on Internet in Favour Topic in 10-15 Mins in English

March 7, 2022 by Prasanna

Debate on Internet in Favour: Honorable judges, respected teachers, my fellow opponents, dear friends and lovely audience, very good morning to all.

Today we are here to discuss the pros and cons of the internet and I will be expressing my views in the debate on internet in favour.

Have you ever heard the popular saying “The world is a small place”? Yes, with the advent of the internet, this saying has come true, the world has really become a small place. The internet has brought the world together and the distance between two persons is not a distance today. Debate on internet in favour will bring out how the internet has become so important in today’s life and why i have chosen to speak on debate on internet in favour.

You can also find more Debate Writing articles on events, persons, sports, technology and many more.

Modern life has become much easier and convenient due to the immense contribution of internet technology for communication and information sharing sitting miles apart. We can use the internet to communicate with people around the world, do business by using the internet, make new friends, know different cultures, search for any type of information, study, explore your interests etc.

Debate on internet in favour will prove that the Internet is always a very important tool in development if used correctly. There are many positive points which prove it to be very useful in modern life.

The Internet is the best source for gathering any type of information. People will learn a subject thoroughly because of the internet. Prior to the internet, you would have to read an entire book to learn about a subject. Now a simple Wikipedia article gives the required information and people don’t have to go and research further.

With the help of the Internet, we can find information on diverse topics that are needed on a single click. You would have to buy expensive textbooks from other parts of the world, to find such information, as such information is unlikely to be found in a local library. With books, it would take a long time to find the specific information. Whereas using the Internet, search engines can give the exact information you need quite easily and within no time Thus saving the time of the students.

People can discuss and share their thoughts and information with others located at different places all over the world. Whether this information is the latest news happenings in the world or information about your favourite celebrity, everything is available at your fingertips.

The Internet can provide information about almost every place on the world map with the help of GPS technology. You can find the quickest route to your location. It can provide you the contact information or address of any showroom or shops or any services man. For example, if you want to get the address of a nearby plumber, you can search for a plumber and get a list of local plumbers in your area with their address and phone number quickly. Even the phone directory will fail to provide it fast.

Now let us see the business point of view. If you want to sell products and services or run a new business, the Internet is the best source to expand your business and the best place to sell goods. You can sell your goods anytime and anywhere as the internet is working 24 hours a day and is accessible throughout the world.. With the help of the internet you can promote your business worldwide through advertisements. Also, there are many online opportunities to earn.

The Internet offers you the benefit to access your bank account at any time from anywhere in the world. Also, you can pay bills, send money electronically through the internet. E-banking like google pay and Paytm, has helped people in this pandemic with cashless transactions.

Here in this debate on internet in favour, I am trying to point out the basic advantages of the internet. Another main advantage of the Internet is online shopping, which allows people to find needed products and buy them without having to visit a store. You can even compare prices between companies for any product with the help of the Internet. Also, online reviews will help you to make better purchasing decisions

The Internet today at the time of this pandemic provides access to endless entertainment. You can watch movies, videos, listen to your favourite music, play games online, etc. on your gadgets in your comfort zone with the help of the Internet. Furthermore, you can download any movies, videos, or other entertainment material via the Internet that can be played anytime without an Internet connection.

In the current pandemic, the Internet has proved to be a boon to the world. Where everyone was stuck at home because of the lockdown it was the internet that kept everyone connected. It was the Internet that helped people to continue their work from home, students can take their classes in their own comfort zone, people can stay updated without going out, and many more. Without the internet the world would have come to standstill and also the mental health of many would have affected.

The internet in India has become one of the major contributors in the economic growth of the country. The use of the internet has increased more than 11 times in the last seven years. It has also affected the metros, towns and villages. The Internet has revolutionised access to information, telephony, television, sharing ideas among other things. As the rise of the internet is increasing it has led to the growth of cyber cities, cyber cafes and internet parlours throughout India. With the rise in its popularity, there is a need for professionals to manage it. Content writing, web page designing, internet advertising have become booming sectors within the IT industry in India. Which has contributed to the generation of employment in India.

Thus the internet has nowadays become an integral part of the life of the people that it is hardly possible to spend even a day without using the internet. This is the prime reason why I choose to speak on debate on internet in favour.

Every aspect has its own pros and cons. Even in this debate on internet in favour you will find advantages and disadvantages of internet but it is upto us how to make proper use of it. Take an example of a knife you can use it to harm others, which is bad or you can also use it for chopping vegetables to cook a meal for your family, which is good.

With this, I conclude my debate on internet in favour , now the younger generation should take responsibility for how they use the internet correctly so that one can reap maximum benefits out of it.

FAQ’s on Debate on Internet in Favour

Question 1. How has the internet proved very useful in the current pandemic?

Answer: The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in schools, colleges offices and all the other institutions being shut all across the world. The Internet proved to be a very useful tool during this pandemic.

Education has changed dramatically, with the distinctive rise of e-learning, whereby teaching is undertaken online on digital platforms with the help of the internet.
People could continue their jobs because of the work from home feature provided by the internet.
The Internet has provided access to endless entertainment. You can watch movies, videos, listen to your favourite music, play games online, etc.
With the help of the internet, it is possible to do online shopping for any food item or any other product.

Question 2. What is the Internet?

Answer: The Internet is a worldwide system of computer networks sometimes referred to as a “network of networks,” that connects many computers all over the world. With the help of the Internet, people can share information and communicate from anywhere with an Internet connection.

Question 3. What are the Uses of the internet?

Answer: The Internet can be used to communicate all over the world across large or small distances, share or access information from any place in the world or get answers to almost any question within a moment.

Some of the common examples of how the Internet is used are:

Social media and content sharing;
E-mail and other forms of communication, Internet telephony, instant messaging, video calling and conferencing, etc;
Online education and self-grooming through access to online degree programs, courses and workshops.
The Internet is used to post open positions, apply for jobs and recruit individuals found on social networking sites.
Picture Dictionary
English Speech
English Slogans
English Letter Writing
English Essay Writing
English Textbook Answers
Types of Certificates
ICSE Solutions
Selina ICSE Solutions
ML Aggarwal Solutions
HSSLive Plus One
HSSLive Plus Two
Kerala SSLC
Distance Education

Speech on Importance Of Internet

The Internet, like a worldwide web, connects you to the rest of the world. It’s like a vast ocean of information, readily available at your fingertips.

Without it, imagine how difficult it would be to send emails, do research, or even make online purchases. The Internet is indeed a valuable tool in our daily lives.

1-minute Speech on Importance Of Internet

Friends, today we’re talking about an essential part of our daily lives – the Internet. Why is it so important? Let’s discuss.

The Internet makes our world smaller. Think about it. We can talk to anyone, anywhere, any time. You can chat with your friend from the next city or even from the other side of the world. The Internet erases the lines on the map, making us all neighbors.

Learning is easier with the Internet. Type a question into Google and you get your answer. No more thick, heavy books. No more long walks to the library. The Internet is like a giant teacher that knows everything. It’s a school that’s open 24/7, waiting for you to learn.

The Internet helps us do things faster. Paying bills, shopping, booking tickets – all done with a few clicks. No long lines, no waiting. It’s like having a magic wand that gets things done instantly.

But the Internet also has a heart. It helps us during tough times. When floods, fires, or sickness come, we can use the Internet to ask for help. It brings us together, helping us care for each other.

In conclusion, the Internet is more than just wires and screens. It’s a tool that brings us closer, makes our lives easier, and helps us when we’re in need. It’s a friend, a teacher, a helper. It’s a part of our lives that’s here to stay. Let’s use it wisely and make the most of what it offers.

2-minute Speech on Importance Of Internet

Good day to you all!

Let’s talk about something that surrounds us every day, the Internet. Imagine a world without it. Tough, isn’t it? That’s because the Internet has become a crucial part of our lives. It’s like a giant invisible web that links us all, no matter where we are.

First, let’s talk about communication. Gone are the days when we had to wait weeks for a letter. Now, we can instantly send messages, photos, and even video calls to anyone, anywhere. It’s like having a magic tool that helps us talk to our friends, family, or even strangers around the world.

Next, let’s talk about learning. The Internet is like a vast ocean of knowledge. Whether it’s homework help, learning a new language, or even cooking a new dish, the Internet has answers to all our questions. It’s like a huge library that’s open 24/7. We can learn new things and improve our skills, all thanks to the Internet.

Also, we can’t forget about shopping. The Internet has made buying things a breeze. We can purchase anything, from clothes, food, gadgets, to even furniture, without leaving our home. It’s like having a giant shopping mall at our fingertips.

Lastly, let’s talk about how the Internet helps us stay updated. Whether it’s news about our city, country, or the world, the Internet keeps us informed. It’s like a big newspaper that updates itself every second.

In conclusion, the Internet is a powerful tool that has transformed our lives. It helps us communicate, learn, entertain ourselves, shop, and stay updated. It’s like a magic wand that can fulfill our needs and wants. But remember, like all powerful tools, we should use the Internet responsibly.

Long Speech on the Internet

A heartfelt welcome to all of you present. I want to take this opportunity and share a few thoughts with you about the internet.

The ushering of the 21st century has brought about a host of changes, the advent of the internet being one of them. To put it in simpler terms, the internet is a virtual network that allows connections on a global scale by means of the world wide web. The internet has ushered in an era of revolution allowing fast connectivity and a whirlpool of resources and information at one’s disposal. The internet has, in true meaning, made the world smaller on a global scale.

As the new millennium progressed, the internet became an indispensable tool. The ease of finding information, the ability to connect instantly became so ingrained in people that imagining a life without the internet seems nearly impossible these days. The internet has brought about many benefits. With a boom in the technological sector, it has created a host of jobs in various fields. Work which in the pre-internet era would require a significant amount of time could be done within a matter of hours. People nowadays no longer have to wait for days or months to be able to communicate with someone. Facilities such as banking, financial transactions, purchasing, have all been made streamlined owing to the internet.

As seen in recent years, the educational sector has also witnessed a major shift, be it the availability of resources or in delivering information, all due to the use of the internet. The vast repository of information available on the internet has enabled the development of quicker and more efficient learning modules and outcomes. Online learning has become the new norm these days. Moreover, the use of the internet has allowed for a more holistic approach to learning with learners now able to audio-visualize as they gather new knowledge and information. The internet, in short, has become a new learning tool.

We must, however, be aware of the fact that with its many advantages, the internet has also brought about a host of disadvantages. The personal information out there on the internet always remains at the risk of falling into the wrong hands. Cybercrimes are a common occurrence these days, ranging from the hacking of personal records for harming someone in particular to the commitment of major banking frauds.

In my concluding remarks, I would like to say that the internet has become both the boon and bane of our existence. To quote, ‘the internet is a necessary evil’. So it is up to us how we make the most out of it all, ensuring that no other individual is adversely affected because of the same. It also remains our responsibility to safeguard our information to the maximum extent possible and prevent it from being misused in any way. As we make significant strides in the advancement of civilization, it is important that we make use of the internet for the betterment of society as a whole.

Short Speech

Speech on the internet.

A warm welcome to all the esteemed ladies and gentlemen. I would like to share a few words on the topic of the internet.

The Internet has become the grain of our existence in the modern-day world. From studies to pharmaceuticals, to groceries to banking, we have the privilege of having the entire world at our fingertips, thanks to the internet. People across the globe are connected today by means of what is known as the world wide web, or popularly, the internet. Gone are the days when people had to wait for hours, weeks or even months to hear from their beloved ones. With the advent of the internet, we can now connect to someone within a matter of minutes.

The era of the internet ushered in with the dawn of the new millennium. What started with the big metropolitan cities, is not available in even the remotest villages. The internet has brought about a revolution in several industrial sectors. In recent years, the education industry also saw a major shift owing to the prevalence of the internet. However, with everything good going on, the usage of the internet has also brought along the ill effects. Practices such as cybercrimes, online fraudulent activity, hacking, etc. are on the rise. Such has been the extent of the ill-effects of the internet that people had to lose their lives as well.

So, as we move forward with the use of the internet in our day-to-day lives, we must make sure to remain vigilant and safe in order to not fall prey or indulge in any sort of harmful practices. The Internet can prove to be a great boon if used judiciously.

10 Lines Speech

Hello to everyone present. Today, I am going to present a speech on the internet.

The internet, as we all know, is a vast network that connects people across the world. The Internet allows us to have a wide range of information on any topic with just a simple click. In addition to information, the internet also helps us to communicate with people across the world. The internet serves as the connecting point for millions of devices by means of the world wide web. The Internet has proven to be very beneficial in our daily lives. Be it obtaining knowledge or information, purchasing commodities, or making payments, everything has become much simpler with the internet. However, there are also various ill-effects of the internet taking place by means of online fraud, loss of personal information, etc.

To conclude, I would like to say that the internet has both its advantages and disadvantages. It is up to us to make the best of it and use it wisely.

Hello everyone.

Today I am here to present my views on the internet. The Internet today has become a necessity. Only a few years ago, it was a luxury only a few could afford. But with the development of technology, the internet has been made accessible and feasible to everyone in society. With the worldwide web(WWW) being its biggest service, it is now connecting millions of people all over the world. The Internet is one of the crucial inventions of humankind. The development of the internet has led to recent media replacing traditional newspapers and journalism. It has led to instant messaging and video communication replacing postcards and manually written letters.

Traditional cinema has been replaced by OTT platforms serving entertainment at the comfort of one’s house. The Internet has replaced offline stores as well. With all the development that has happened over the years due to the invention of the internet, One cannot simply assume that there are no ill effects of it.

The whole world is connected via the internet. It is a good thing, it also means that quality time with friends and family in person holds less value, and there is no escape from work.

The Internet is addictive, and if there are no proper boundaries for using it, It can cause ill effects on the human mind as well as other areas of life. Lack of sleep is a common problem seen in students today. Social media and the rise of video platforms like youtube have only made it difficult to restrict the use of the internet.

I do want to shed some light on the advantages of the internet. The internet is by far the most amazing invention.

Overflow of Information

The Internet is the sea of abundant information. The information that has been searched for is just one google search away. There is a tonne of resources available for anything that is needed. Be it any query or a recipe or a course of photography, one can always find a solution to the internet.

Education for All

In the era of online learning, not only are the students benefited by the internet, but also the people who do not have the time to attend classes in person. So many housewives have turned to their hobbies by joining online classes, The students can now get viable information on any subject by surfing the internet. The Internet comes in handy when one needs to know things fast, and now. Education is accessible for all now and this is the boon of the internet. Teachers can teach via online portals no matter where they are in the world. They can also upload pre-recorded videos online so that the students can watch them at their convenience. One can learn any skill they wish to learn and the internet has at least one or two resources or courses regarding the same.

Online Services

With the online world dominating the internet, Every domain has come under the influence of it, even the services industry as well. With just one click one can order restaurant-cooked food, buy new clothes and book a spa appointment, and also consult a doctor. This convenience provided by the internet has helped humans do more things and not waste time. The best examples include Flipkart, Amazon, and Zomato. Buying and ordering things online has become easy and accessible to all. Even emails can be delivered with just one click, and money transfers can be done on the computers and one need not visit the bank for it.

Social Media

The one thing that has to be highlighted while talking about the internet is the importance of social media.

Social media’s rapid growth has made us feel connected. We are just one click away from talking to the person staying across the globe. Platforms like Youtube, Instagram, Facebook let you share your story, and ideas over the internet free of cost. They bring forth the creativity of humans.

Online Business

The trend of online businesses is not just a trend anymore, they are replacing the traditional business run from the brick and mortar stores. Every business right now has a website and an online store. It is so convenient to market the business when it has a social media presence. The business can make a name globally and reach more target audiences, and this will in turn help in making profits.

The internet has a lot of advantages and disadvantages. Although, it is upon the user to be cautious, to not overindulge on the internet. For everything is turned into a disadvantage when not done with precautions. Setting healthy boundaries around the usage of the internet can be super beneficial in the long term.

ARGUMENTS FOR AND AGAINST THE USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA

Arif Emre Yıldız

Social media is an interactive tool that allows users to share ideas and information. It is a new ambiance for young people to introduce themselves to other people. That’s why teenagers use it increasingly. Furthermore, YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram are some of the most common social media applications around the world. At present, accessing social media and the internet is easier than at any time because people can connect to social media by phone, computer, or tablet with the internet. There is no doubt that lots of young people are spending much of their time on social media and they are affected both positively and negatively in terms of their mental health and sociability.

There are many arguments against using social media but one of the most essential disadvantages of using it is that people are becoming more and more lonely. According to the National Institute on Drug Abuse (2017), permanent engagement with the internet and especially social media cause great changes in young people’s attitudes and behaviors. In a youth survey, it was seen that most youngsters felt more lonely after they started using social media. Also, young people do not hang out with their friends and they are feeling increasingly insecure. Sleeplessness rates among them are increasing. Another drawback of using social media is the decreasing interest in school, and most importantly, it may lead teenagers to internet addiction. If addiction is serious, their mental health will also be badly affected. UK Teachers Union (2018) reports that young people expend much time on social media because of its appeal but this situation may affect their social activities and schoolwork negatively and may bring about addiction to social media platforms.

On the other hand, there are many positive arguments for using social media. One advantage of using it is that it facilitates access to information. Owing to social media, young people grow up with more information and they can more easily discover what they want. US Media Alliance (2018) argues that by using social media, young people can instantly learn what is happening all over the world and thus, be informed about current events. Thanks to the information they have learned, it becomes easier for them to become more informed people. Another positive aspect of using social media is that youngsters can join groups and fan pages because they can readily direct their interests and abilities and can share about themselves. Thus, they can contribute to themselves and boost their self-esteem.

To sum up, there are a lot of advantages and disadvantages which affect mental health and social interactions in using social media, especially for teenagers. In my opinion, the harms and benefits of using social media depend on the person who uses it. Therefore, it is necessary to raise the awareness of people, especially young people, about the balanced use of social media.

Reference List:

Monitoring the Future survey, National Institute on Drug Abuse, (2017)

https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2017/09/has-the-smartphone-destroyed-a-generation/534198/

Retrieved date: September 2017

Kathleen Berty, UK Teachers Union, (2018)

Retrieved date: November 2018

Pia Lalanchop, US Media Alliance, (2018)

Written by Arif Emre Yıldız

Electrical&Electronic engineering | 20 |

Text to speech

Speech on Internet for Students and Children

Speech on Internet

Very good morning to all. Today, I am here to present a speech on internet. Someone has rightly said that the world is a small place. With the advent of the internet, this saying seems realistic. The internet has really bought the world together and the distance between two persons is really not a distance today. We all know about the technological advancements happening in the world. One of the major attributes of technological advancement is the internet. Today the internet is available easily to many individuals. Also, it is rapidly changing the way we work, travel, educate and entertain.

Source: pixabay.com

Evolution of Internet

Many of you are aware of what the internet facility is. Still, I would like to highlight the aspects of the internet. The internet is a facility wherein two gadget screens are connected through signals. Thus, through this medium, the information can be exchanged between two gadgets.

The history of the internet dates back to 40 years ago with its first use in the United States of America and the inventor of the internet was Robert E.Kahn and Vint Cerf. Earlier the internet was only used to send emails between two computers. Today it has reached all distant parts of the globe with more than 1.5 million users. They use the internet for exchange of information, entertainment, money exchanges, etc.

Get the Huge list of 100+ Speech Topics here

Pros of the Internet

The internet facility has many advantages and it has proved to be a milestone in the technical advancement of humankind. It allows users to exchange and communicate information. Two users who are sitting in distant corners of the world can easily communicate through mails, chats, and video conferencing by using the internet.

It provides information of all kinds to its users. Also, it provides entertainment by offering services of watching movies, listening to music, playing a game. Various day to day activities such as travel ticket bookings, banking facilities, shopping, etc. can be easily done through the internet.

Nowadays the internet also offers various dating websites and matrimonial websites by which one can find their prospective soul mate.

The Internet also offers a facility to its users where they can earn online by means of blogs and video blogs. These are some of the major benefits of the internet has a dark side also.

Cons of the Internet

Many a number of people misuse information for fraud and illegal works. Due to excessive use of the internet in the wrong hands, a number of cybercrimes are happening which is affecting the trust of the people on the internet.

Abuse over social media is also prevailing through the internet wherein people of negative mentality abuse other people on the basis of caste, race, color, appearance, etc. Addiction to online games is one of the major problems of parents today as children get addicted to online games and avoid their studies and outdoor activities.

The internet has nowadays become such an important part of the life of the people that it is hardly possible to spend even a day without using the internet. Thus after seeing the negatives of the internet, it is not practically possible to completely avoid the internet. However, we can put a timeline or restriction on its usage especially to children.

The parents and teachers can monitor the online activities of their children and guide them on the proper use of the internet. We should also educate and aware people of online cybercrime and fraud. Thus through proper precautions and adopting safety measures the internet can prove to be a boon for the development of human society.

Read Essays for Students and Children here !

Customize your course in 30 seconds

Which class are you in.

Speech for Students

Speech on India for Students and Children
Speech on Mother for Students and Children
Speech on Air Pollution for Students and Children
Speech about Life for Students and Children
Speech on Disaster Management for Students and Children
Speech on Generation Gap for Students and Children
Speech on Indian Culture for Students and Children
Speech on Sports for Students and Children
Speech on Water for Students and Children

16 responses to “Speech on Water for Students and Children”

this was very helpful it saved my life i got this at the correct time very nice and helpful

This Helped Me With My Speech!!!

I can give it 100 stars for the speech it is amazing i love it.

Its amazing!!

Great !!!! It is an advanced definition and detail about Pollution. The word limit is also sufficient. It helped me a lot.

This is very good

Very helpful in my speech

Oh my god, this saved my life. You can just copy and paste it and change a few words. I would give this 4 out of 5 stars, because I had to research a few words. But my teacher didn’t know about this website, so amazing.

Tomorrow is my exam . This is Very helpfull

It’s really very helpful

yah it’s is very cool and helpful for me… a lot of 👍👍👍

Very much helpful and its well crafted and expressed. Thumb’s up!!!

wow so amazing it helped me that one of environment infact i was given a certificate

check it out travel and tourism voucher

thank you very much

Download the App

Search form

A for and against essay about the internet.

Look at the essay and do the exercises to improve your writing skills.

Instructions

Do the preparation exercise first. Then read the text and do the other exercises.

Preparation

Check your writing: grouping - ideas

Check your writing: gap fill - useful phrases, worksheets and downloads.

What's your opinion? Do you think the internet is bad for young people?

We will process your data to send you our newsletter and updates based on your consent. You can unsubscribe at any time by clicking the "unsubscribe" link at the bottom of every email. Read our privacy policy for more information.

India’s Largest Career Transformation Portal

Speech on Internet for Students & Children in English [3 Minutes]

December 10, 2020 by Sandeep

Speech on Internet: Internet is one of the smartest revolutionary inventions of mankind. It has broken distance barriers and made the world a small place to live in. With the internet, we can access any information at our fingertips at lightning speeds. We require computers/ laptops/ smartphones to access the internet easily. 4G technologies have made internet access super paced and very fast. Robert E Kahn and Vincent Cerf invented the internet. Internet is used for learning, shopping, banking, booking tickets, etc.

Speech on Internet 500 Words In English

Below we have provided a speech on Internet, written in easy and simple words for class 7, 8, 9 and 10 school students.

Good morning to everyone present over here. Today I am here to deliver my speech on the internet. John Stewart has rightly said that “ The internet is just a world passing notes around a classroom.”

The internet has brought the world too close today; the physical distance is no more a real distance between anyone. The internet has made our lives easy & comfortable. Most advances in technologies are attributed to the internet in today’s world. It is one of the most significant inventions which has completely changed the way we live.

Internet is a network facility which helps in sharing information. It was invented 40 years back by Robert E. Kahn and Vint Cerf for sending emails. It has transformed a lot in last with time. We all use internet today, let it be on our mobile phones, computers or laptops for different purposes. Many of us may be using it for office work, learning, some for shopping, playing & many more.

Restaurants, malls, transportation, and banking everywhere the internet is playing a significant role. It is an excellent source of knowledge & valuable resources for learning. The primary entertainment sources for today’s world is internet. Let it be music, song, dance, series or movie everything is available just a click away. We can connect to our loved ones, a thousand kilometres away just by doing a video call. For many internet has become the source of income, people have started earning by writing blogs, etc. The usage of internet is uncountable.

Though internet is an excellent servant, it does have some ill effects. Misuse of information & fraud is increasing day by day. Cybercrimes have become a significant concern which is getting monitored closely. The influence of social media is so hyped among people that people are ready to do anything for getting famous. People are unnecessarily spending time which has created problems in their social lives. Believing internet blindly has become a common practice which has resulted in the circulation of fake news.

We all cannot deny that the internet has become a part of our life. It is not easy to spend a day without the internet. So we all need to maintain the balance between the positive & negative impacts of the internet. Judicious use with proper precautions will prove the internet to be a boon for humanity. Let us join hands & pledge to use the greatest invention of time for transforming the world in the right way.

Short Speech on Internet 150 Words

Find below a short speech on the Internet in English, suitable for class 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 students.

A very welcome to all of you to the session of discussion on the internet. Internet is not new to anyone us. It was invented 40 years back by Robert E. Kahn and Vint Cerf with its very first use in the United States to send emails. Today there are 3.5 billion users in the world & you are one of them. Talking about the usage of the internet, it has left no fields untouched. Today we can book our travelling tickets online; we need not make a queue. We can shop sitting at home from a variety of options; we need not step out to market.

We can also take the consultation of doctors, which is just a click away. We do not wait anymore to meet our near & dear ones; we connect to them through video calls. Getting bored need not wait for a TV program; we have plenty of options available online. Even today, people are searching for their soulmates on the internet. Even students are nowadays dependent only on online sources for learning. Not only these, internet has completely transformed the life we once lived in. You all will agree that it has made our life simpler & more comfortable for us.

However, we all know that a coin has two sides, one good & bad. Till now, I only highlighted the best part of the internet. Let me tell you the internet can have numerous negative impacts if we do not use it cautiously.The illegal works, fraud or we can say cyber crimes are increasing day by day. People are wasting time on internet instead of using the valuable time. People have started living virtual life with no understanding of the world outside. Children are spending more time playing online games instead of any physical activities.

All these issues are leading us to a bigger problem. We all being aware of the pros & cons of usage of the internet and must be alert enough to use it in the right way. It is one of the greatest inventions of humanity which can be solely used for the development of the people globally. So let us join our hands & work together in that direction to use the internet for the useful transformations only.

Elementary School
Reading & Speaking
External Independent Testing
Grammar Exercises

An Argumentative essay: The Internet

Wrting an argumentative essay

Write an argumentative essay for or against the following statement: The Internet has improved our life.

The internet has improved our life. But is this really an improvement?

There are some arguments both for and against.

One positive aspect of the internet is convenience.

Firstly, you can communicate with people all over the world.

Secondly, you can find any information in the web.

Thirdly, it’s easier to do shopping online because it saves your time, money and energy.

Furthermore, you can watch TV, listen to radio, watch films online.

In addition, you may have fun in social networking.

On the other hand, there are lot’s of people who spend an enormous amount of time in front of their computers and laptops. Doctors and psychologists say it’s a big problem that does harm to people’s health. Internet addiction syndrome is recognized as a new illness.

Moreover, people who spend too much time in virtual reality stop hanging out with their friends.

What is more, being online can be dangerous sometimes. Parents and teachers must warn their children about the dangers of the internet.

In conclusion, I’d like to say that we can’t live without the internet but we have to use the World Wide Web sensibly.

As far as I am concerned, I spend much time online surfing the net because it helps me to do my homework. I often download the music I like and play computer games online. I often e-mail and post my English essays on the website to improve my writing skills.

Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!

English Lessons

Modern Gadgets

Moving in Search of Another Place

My Dream House

Become Vegetarians

Future Plans

Extended Family Living

Teenagers’ Spare Time

Using Mobile Phones at School

Advantages and Disadvantages of the Internet in Education

One comment.

Thank you very much. With this information, I prepared for the lesson and got a good mark.

3 Minute Speech on Internet in English for Students

Good Morning everyone, Today I am going to share my views on the topic “Internet .”

Internet is a very important part of today’s life,not only professionally but in all day to day activities, without it we can’t even imagine our survival. Almost every person uses the internet for different purposes like students use it for academic purposes .

There are many benefits of using the internet. One of the major benefits of using the internet is that it provides vast amounts of information. You can find any type of information on the internet very easily. Internet has made everything easy and possible for human beings.

We can connect globally with people all around the world with the help of the internet. It has made the life of human beings very easy and comfortable. We should use it in the right way for attaining its most benefits.

6 minute read

Should The Internet Be Policed?

Few observers could have predicted the fuss that the Internet began to generate in political and legal circles in the mid-1990s. After all, the global computer network linking 160 countries was hyped relentlessly in the media in the early 1990s. It spawned a multimillion-dollar industry in Internet services and a publishing empire devoted to the online experience—not to mention Hollywood movies, newspaper columns, and new jargon. But the honeymoon did not last. Like other communications media before it, the Internet provoked controversy about what was actually sent across it. Federal and state lawmakers proposed crackdowns on its content. Prosecutors took aim at its users. Civil liberties groups fought back. As the various factions engaged in a tug-of war over the future of this sprawling medium, the debate became a question of freedom or control: should the Internet be left alone as a marketplace of ideas, or should it be regulated, policed, and ultimately "cleaned up"? Although this question became heated during the early- to mid-1990s, it has remained a debated issue into the early 2000s.

More than three decades after DEFENSE DEPARTMENT contractors put it up, the network remains free from official control. This system has no central governing authority for a very good reason: the general public was never intended to use it. Its designers in the late 1960s were scientists. Several years later, academics and students around the world got access to it. In the 1990s, millions of people in U.S. businesses and homes signed on. Before the public signed on its predecessors had long since developed a kind of Internet culture—essentially, a freewheeling, anything-goes setting. The opening of the Internet to everyone from citizens to corporations necessarily ruptured this formerly closed society, and conflicts appeared.

Speech rights quickly became a hot topic of debate. The Internet is a communications medium, and people have raised objections to speech online just as they have to speech in the real world. The Internet allows for a variety of media—text, pictures, movies, and sound—and PORNOGRAPHY is abundantly accessible online in all these forms. It is commonly "posted" as coded information to a part of the Internet called Usenet, a public issues forum that is used primarily for discussions. With over 10,000 topic areas, called news groups, Usenet literally caters to the world's panoply of interests and tastes. Certain news groups are devoted entirely to pornography. As the speed of the Internet increased dramatically with the development of broadband access in the late 1990s and early 2000s, not only has more of this type of information become more available, but also users have been able to access this information in greater quantity.

Several signs in 1994 predicted a legal crackdown on the Internet. Early on, U.S. attorney general JANET RENO said criminal investigators were exploring the originators of online CHILD PORNOGRAPHY . In July 1994, federal prosecutors won an OBSCENITY conviction in Tennessee against the operators of a computer bulletin board system (BBS) called the Amateur Action BBS, a private porn subscription service. Quickly becoming a cause célèbre in the online world, the case raised the question of how far off a general Internet crackdown could be.

In December 1994, a college student's fiction raised a furor. Jake Baker, a sophomore in linguistics at the University of Michigan, published a story about sexual torture in the alt.sex.stories news group on Usenet. Its lurid detail was not unique in the news group, but something else was: Baker used the name of a female classmate for one of his fictional victims. Once the name was recognized, campus critics of pornography lashed out at Baker.

Baker's case demonstrated how seriously objections to Internet material would be taken. In January 1995, the University of Michigan opened an investigation, and soon, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION agents began reviewing Baker's E-MAIL . Baker insisted he meant no harm, suggesting that he wanted to be a creative writer. He even submitted to a psychological profile, which determined that he posed no danger to the student named in his story or to anyone else. But on February 9, 1995, federal authorities arrested him. He was charged with five counts of using inter-state communications to make threats to injure—and kidnap—another person. Lacking any specific target for Baker's alleged threats, yet armed with allegedly incriminating e-mail, prosecutors charged that he was dangerous to other university students. The AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION (ACLU) came to his aid, arguing in an amicus brief that the accusations were baseless and moreover violated Baker's FIRST AMENDMENT rights. A U.S. district court judge threw out the case.

The U.S. Senate had its own ideas about online speech. In February 1995, Senator J. James Exon (D-NE) introduced the Communications Decency Act (S. 314, 104th Cong., 1st Sess. [1995]). Targeting "obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, or indecent" electronic communications, the bill called for two-year prison sentences and fines of up to $100,000 for anyone who makes such material available to anyone under the age of 18. In its original form, the bill would have established broad criminal liability: users, online services, and the hundreds of small businesses providing Internet accounts would all be required to keep their messages, stories, postings, and e-mail decent. After vigorous protest from access providers, the bill was watered down to protect them: they would not be held liable unless they knowingly provided indecent material.

Several groups lined up to stop the Decency Act. Opposition came from civil liberties groups including the ACLU, the ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION (EFF), and Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility, as well as from online services and Internet access providers. They argued that the bill sought to criminalize speech that is constitutionally protected under the First Amendment.

Although Congress eventually outlawed obscene and other forms of indecent sexual material on the Internet in the Communications Decency Act of 1996, 47 U.S.C.A. § 223, the statute was challenged immediately. In Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union , 521 U.S. 844, 117 S. Ct. 2329, 138 L. Ed. 2d 874 (1997), the Supreme Court found that most of the statute's provisions violated the First Amendment. Congress subsequently sought to focus its attention on legislation that proscribes the transmission of child pornography, though the Supreme Court in a series of cases found that these statutes were likewise unconstitutional.

The central concern in Reno and the subsequent cases was that Congress has prohibited constitutionally protected speech in addition to speech that is not afforded First Amendment protection. Some members of Congress and supporters of such legislation suggested that restrictions on obscene and indecent information are necessary in order to protect children who use the Internet. But opponents of these restrictions noted that the Internet cannot be reduced to include only that information that is appropriate for children, and the Supreme Court reached this precise conclusion.

Although the debate about whether the government should regulate pornography and other obscene material continued, much of the focus about Internet policing shifted to other issues that involve the Internet. One important issue has been how the government can protect COPYRIGHT and other INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY owners from PIRACY that is somewhat common on the medium. Another major issue is how the government can prevent the dissemination of unwanted advertising, usually sent through e-mail and commonly referred to as spam. Likewise, computer viruses have caused millions of dollars of damages to computer owners in the United States and worldwide in the 1990s and 2000s, and most of these viruses have been distributed through the Internet.

Many Internet users, some of whom may otherwise object to government regulation of the medium, view governmental regulation that protects users from such problems as piracy, viruses, and spam more favorably than other forms of regulation. Nevertheless, even regulation of COMPUTER CRIME raises issues, such as whether such regulation may violate users' First Amendment rights or how government regulation protecting against these harms can be effective. As the Internet continues to develop, and even as the medium gradually becomes more standardized, these questions largely remain unanswered.

CROSS-REFERENCES

Additional topics.

Internet - Further Readings
Other Free Encyclopedias

Law Library - American Law and Legal Information Free Legal Encyclopedia: Internal Revenue Service - Duties And Powers to Joint will Internet - Should The Internet Be Policed?, Further Readings

Mobile Close Open Menu

In Favor of the Public Interest: Social Media Should be Regulated

Jan 31, 2020

Stay updated on news, events, and more

Join our mailing list

In response to the question " Is there an ethical responsibility to regulate the Internet? ", the following essay was selected as a winner of Carnegie Council's 2019 international student essay contest.

Subscribe to the carnegie ethics newsletter for more on the ethics of emerging technology, essay by rita valkovskaya.

Social media presents a number of dangers that require urgent and immediate regulation, including online harassment; racist, bigoted and divisive content; terrorist and right-wing calls for radicalization; as well as unidentified use of social media for political advertising by foreign and domestic actors. To mitigate these societal ills, carefully crafted policy that balances civil liberties and the need for security must be implemented in line with the latest cybersecurity developments. According to Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (CDA), private online service providers are free from liability for content posted on their sites, with some exceptions for child pornography, human trafficking, and other federal offenses. Social media freedom has empowered state and non-state actors with the means and know how to co-opt the media landscape. For example, in 2016 Russia used Facebook to micro-targets ads at Americans in order to sway the presidential election. This environment has also allowed "lone-wolf" attackers to use social media to broadcast violence. In 2019, the New Zealand mosque mass shooter live-streamed the attacks. Self-regulation by social media companies has thus far failed to address the growing threat to safety and democracy through suspect online content. The lack of control and regulation will continue to leave media content in a frightening vacuum, as foreign powers like Russia, and domestic and international extremists become ever more skilled at using social media to advance their agendas. The introduction and evolution of AI technology that is now capable of creating "deep fake" video content, using bots to micro-target populations with ads, and participate in human-like conversations, presents imminent future dangers of exponentially multiplying the current threats. Historically, in line with widely accepted journalistic standards of impartiality and accuracy, print publication editors at major news organizations applied a strict standard of ethical journalism before publishing content. As a result, they had the editorial power to prevent harmful content from reaching major audiences. Until the 1980's the "Big Three" media channels dominated American television, providing similar oversight in television. The interpretation of news by beloved newscasters like Walter Cronkite and Peter Jennings had the trust of the American public. Today, the editorial monopoly previously held by major news networks and print publications is being contested by numerous Internet sources. Falling print subscription rates have resulted in the collapse of the print publishing industry, with many major newspapers closing their doors or significantly diminishing the scope of coverage. Individuals, foreign interests, and anyone with a social media account and the ability to "crack" the code of social media distribution is capable of reaching audiences as large as major news sources like The New York Times or NBC News. According to James Lewis of the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), this new Internet and media structure creates "an absence of mediation" that is present in traditional media in the form of editors, or in a library in the form of a librarian. As a result, he argues, "fiction and fact blend easily." The biggest social media companies (Facebook, YouTube, Twitter) have both precipitated and exploited this growing media vacuum. According to a 2018 Pew Research study, roughly two-thirds of Americans get their news on social media, with Facebook accounting for 43 percent and YouTube for 21 percent of content. In his book Social Media and the Public Interest, Philip Napoli argues that coders and engineers are now on par with editors and journalists when it comes to crafting and disseminating media content. In the U.S., free speech has historically been adamantly protected, and potential infringement on it via social media regulation is anathema to anti-regulators. However, social media presents increasingly more dangers than traditional First Amendment expressions like spoken word. In the online sphere, "natural" forms of social regulation have become obsolete. Anonymity of Internet postings limits the ability of society to "penalize" the actor who chooses to use socially suspect language or ideas. For example, in real life, in-person harassment may cause physical retaliation, while repetition of controversial and fringe ideas can cause social ostracism, affecting the future expression of such anti-social behaviors. Online, anti-social personalities meet their equals and unite in their transgressions. Security is the foundation of a free society, and is foundational for the freedom to vote in a fair and free environment. Today many Americans feel a lack of adequate security when faced with revelations of foreign interference in domestic elections, or instances of terrorists and extremists using social media platforms to conduct operations to murder and maim. The sheer size of the social media market in news delivery, as well as the numerous instances of social media being used for harmful ends, are powerful reasons why the freedom of social media must be limited with carefully crafted, democratically discussed regulations. Without it, our society is giving the reigns of our security, the direction of our value system, and a healthy functioning of our election cycle, to uncontrollable and unpredictable forces, or worse yet, to malicious actors who act with ill intent against the public interest. I propose the following first steps to achieve effective social media regulation: 1. The government must create a clear set of standards for social media communication, and compel compliance The development of new laws and policy should be the outcome of engagement with the private sector, the security community, as well as international actors in order to design a system upon consensus and multi-disciplinary, balanced set of views. For example, 2018 legislation proposed in the U.S. Senate aimed to protect the right of the population not to be targeted and misled by social media micro-targeted content and political ads placed by foreign powers. The "Honest Ads Act" proposes compelling social media companies to disclose their advertising methods. The "Bot Disclosure Accountability Act" proposes the creation of limits on the use of automation behind ads on social media. Further legislation must be developed in order to assure transparency behind ads and memes and allow readers of social media to become educated consumers, making educated choices based on disclosures about who placed the ads and content, and who provided the funding for the content. 2. The government must actively engage in multilateral negotiations with international partners to establish a base standard of behavior in the social sphere, and define what constitutes a cyber-information attack or cyber attacks Russia has weaponized the information sphere to spread disinformation during the 2016 elections in the U.S., and has used these tactics during military action in Georgia and Ukraine, in order to confuse public opinion and win military conflicts. In order to prevent further attacks, the U.S. must define the "red lines" that foreign actors must not cross, or else risk some specified retaliation from the United States. 3. The United States should follow and evaluate the outcomes of social media regulation already executed in other countries, and base domestic regulation on best practices For example, Singapore's recent legislation criminalized fake news, as defined within the discretion of the government. Violators who don't comply with government requests are penalized with hefty fines. Germany now regulates social media content via the Network Enforcement Act, aka NetzDG, by mandating that social media providers comply with government guidelines on blocking hate speech, defamation, and other illegal content. Fines go up to $56 million per violation. 4. The government should continue to provide research funding for private firms, the government, and academic institutions to advance the use of machine learning and AI in the spheres of social media "clean-up" Using automated regulation is a cumbersome and nascent exercise. Current use of AI to delete offensive content has the potential of making mistakes, and is too labor intensive to moderate every single social media message posted online. As a result, significant funding into this field is crucial in order to balance targeted content removal with constitutional free speech protections. A successful example of automated content regulation is Google's Redirect Method, which uses an AI algorithm to guide the users to content opposing extremism if they seek out offensive content like terrorists messaging.

In the U.S., where media access is varied and free and journalistic integrity continues to be a celebrated standard, there is a false feeling of security in regards to the quality, fairness, and truthfulness of information that people consume. Because the media is not used as a tool of government control as in a dictatorial state, it is easy to forget that the media can have powerful effects on their psyche, emotions, consumer choices, choices of jobs, and social behaviors. Continuing without regulation out of fear of undue government control over free speech results in embracing the steady flow of harmful content generated haphazardly by multiple parties on social media, as a continuing threat the public interest.

Rita Valkovskaya is a Master of Public Administration student at Syracuse University's Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs focusing on security, emerging technologies, and Russian and Eurasian affairs. She is a graduate of Georgetown University's School of Foreign Service. She currently works as a graduate researcher at the Syracuse University Institute for Security Policy and Law, where she conducts research into the Russian technology sector. Rita's future goals are to influence policy in order to serve and better the local and global community. With a former professional background in luxury manufacturing and entrepreneurship, Rita combines her passion for global affairs and security with a deep understanding of business, global supply chains, and the power of image creation in the media. In her free time, Rita loves to hike, kayak, explore the outdoors, and travel.

2054, with Elliot Ackerman and Admiral James Stavridis

Ackerman & Admiral Stavridis join "The Doorstep" for a talk on AI, geopolitics, and a dark future that we must do all we can to avoid.

Hosted by Nikolas K. Gvosdev & Tatiana Serafin

FEB 23, 2024 • Article

What Do We Mean When We Talk About "AI Democratization"?

With numerous parties calling for "AI democratization," Elizabeth Seger, director of the CASM digital policy research hub at Demos, discusses four meanings of the term.

By Elizabeth Seger

MAR 13, 2023 • Podcast

C2GTalk: How can companies ensure carbon dioxide removal has a positive impact? with Amy Luers

New thinking is needed to ensure high-quality nature-based carbon dioxide removal (CDR) offers genuine and long-lasting benefits to the climate and biodiversity, says Amy Luers, ...

Hosted by Mark Turner

Ethics Empowered

Using the power of ethics to build a better world

Sign up for news & events

[email protected] 212-838-4122 170 East 64th Street New York, NY 10065

Privacy Policy
Accessibility Policy

Ethics & Leadership
Fact-Checking
Media Literacy
The Craig Newmark Center
Reporting & Editing
Ethics & Trust
Tech & Tools
Business & Work
Educators & Students
Training Catalog
Custom Teaching
For ACES Members
All Categories
Broadcast & Visual Journalism
Fact-Checking & Media Literacy
In-newsroom
Memphis, Tenn.
Minneapolis, Minn.
St. Petersburg, Fla.
Washington, D.C.
Poynter ACES Introductory Certificate in Editing
Poynter ACES Intermediate Certificate in Editing
Ethics & Trust Articles
Get Ethics Advice
Fact-Checking Articles
IFCN Grants
International Fact-Checking Day
Teen Fact-Checking Network
International
Media Literacy Training
MediaWise Resources
Ambassadors
MediaWise in the News

Support responsible news and fact-based information today!

What you need to know about Section 230, the ‘most important law protecting internet speech’

Section 230 grants broad legal protections to websites that host user-generated content, like facebook and google..

A law credited with birthing the internet — and with spurring misinformation — has drawn bipartisan ire from lawmakers who are vowing to change it.

Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act shields internet platforms from liability for much of what its users post.

Both Democrats and Republicans point to Section 230 as a law that gives too much protection to companies like Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, Amazon and Google — with different reasons.

Former President Donald Trump wanted changes to Section 230 and vetoed a military spending bill in December because it didn’t include them. President Joe Biden has said that he’d be in favor of revoking the provision altogether. Biden’s pick for commerce secretary said she will pursue changes to Section 230 if confirmed.

There are several bills in Congress that would repeal Section 230 or amend its scope in order to limit the power of the platforms. In response, even tech companies have called for revising a law they say is outdated.

“In the offline world, it’s not just the person who pulls the trigger, or makes the threat or causes the damage — we hold a lot of people accountable,” said Mary Anne Franks, a law professor at the University of Miami. “Section 230 and the way it’s been interpreted essentially says none of those rules apply here.”

How did Section 230 come to be, and how could potential reforms affect the internet? We consulted the law and its experts to find out. (Have a question we didn’t answer here? Send it to [email protected] .)

What is Section 230?

Donna Rice Hughes, of the anti-pornography organization Enough is Enough, meets reporters outside the Supreme Court in Washington Wednesday, March 19, 1997, after the court heard arguments challenging the 1996 Communications Decency Act. The court, in its first look at free speech on the Internet, was asked to uphold a law that made it a crime to put indecent words or pictures online where children can find them. They struck it down. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)

Congress passed the Communications Decency Act as Title V of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 , when an increasing number of Americans started to use the internet. Its original purpose was to prohibit making “indecent” or “patently offensive” material available to children.

In 1997, the Supreme Court struck down the Communications Decency Act as an unconstitutional violation of free speech. But one of its provisions survived and, ironically, laid the groundwork for protecting online speech.

Section 230 says: “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.”

That provision, grounded in the language of First Amendment law, grants broad legal protections to websites that host user-generated content. It essentially means they can’t be sued for libel or defamation for user posts. Section 230 is especially important to social media platforms, but it also protects news sites that allow reader comments or auction sites that let users sell products or services.

RELATED TRAINING: Pay Attention: Legal Issues and Your Media Company

“Section 230 is understood primarily as a reaction to state court cases threatening to hold online service providers liable for (possible) libels committed by their users,” said Tejas Narechania, an assistant law professor at the University of California-Berkeley.

Section 230 changed that. For example, if a Facebook user publishes something defamatory, Facebook itself can’t be sued for defamation, but the post’s original author can be. That’s different from publishers like the New York Times, which can be held liable for content they publish — even if they didn’t originate the offending claim.

There are some exceptions in Section 230, including for copyright infringement and violations of federal and state law. But in general, the provision grants social media platforms far more leeway than other industries in the U.S.

Why does it matter?

Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), one of the authors of Section 230, in 2021. (Demetrius Freeman/The Washington Post via AP, Pool)

Section 230 is the reason that you can post photos on Instagram, find search results on Google and list items on eBay. The Electronic Frontier Foundation, a nonprofit digital rights group, calls it “the most important law protecting internet speech.”

Section 230 is generally considered to be speech-protective, meaning that it allows for more content rather than less on internet platforms. That objective was baked into the law.

In crafting Section 230, Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., and Rep. Chris Cox, R-Calif., “both recognized that the internet had the potential to create a new industry,” wrote Jeff Kosseff in “The Twenty-Six Words That Created the Internet .”

“Section 230, they hoped, would allow technology companies to freely innovate and create open platforms for user content,” Kosseff wrote. “Shielding internet companies from regulation and lawsuits would encourage investment and growth, they thought.”

Wyden and Cox were right — today, American tech platforms like Facebook and Google have billions of users and are among the wealthiest companies in the world. But they’ve also become vehicles for disinformation and hate speech , in part because Section 230 left it up to the platforms themselves to decide how to moderate content.

Until relatively recently, most companies took a light touch to moderation of content that’s not illegal, but still problematic. (PolitiFact, for example, participates in programs run by Facebook and TikTok to fight misinformation. )

“You don’t have to devote any resources to make your products and services safe or less harmful — you can solely go towards profit-making,” said Franks, the law professor. “Section 230 has gone way past the idea of gentle nudges toward moderation, towards essentially it doesn’t matter if you moderate or not.”

Without Section 230, tech companies would be forced to think about their legal liability in an entirely different way.

“Without Section 230, companies could be sued for their users’ blog posts, social media ramblings of homemade online videos,” Kosseff wrote. “The mere prospect of such lawsuits would force websites and online service providers to reduce or entirely prohibit user-generated content.”

Has the law changed?

The law has changed a little bit since 1996.

Section 230’s first major challenge came in 1997, when America Online was sued for failing to remove libelous ads that erroneously connected a man’s phone number to the Oklahoma City bombing. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit ruled in favor of AOL, citing Section 230.

“That’s the case that basically set out very expansive protection,” said Olivier Sylvain, a law professor at Fordham University. “It held that even when an intermediary, AOL in this case, knows about unlawful content … it still is not obliged under law to take that stuff down.”

That’s different from how the First Amendment treats other distributors, such as booksellers. But the legal protections aren’t limitless.

In 2008, the Ninth Circuit appeals court ruled that Roommates.com could not claim immunity from anti-discrimination laws for requiring users to choose the preferred traits of potential roommates. Section 230 was further weakened in 2018 when Trump signed a package of bills aimed at limiting online human trafficking.

The package created an exception that held websites liable for ads for prostitution. As a result, Craigslist shut down its section for personal ads and certain Reddit groups were banned .

What reforms are being considered?

Sen. Joshua Hawley (R-Mo.) is one of several senators who has introduced a bill to modify or repeal Section 230. (Graeme Jennings/Pool via AP)

In 2020, following a Trump executive order on “preventing online censorship,” the Justice Department published a review of Section 230. In it, the department recommended that Congress revise the law to include carve-outs for “egregious content” related to child abuse, terrorism and cyber-stalking. The review also proposed revoking Section 230 immunity in cases where a platform had “actual knowledge or notice” that a piece of content was unlawful.

The Justice Department review came out the same day that Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., introduced a bill that would require companies to revise their terms of service to include a “duty of good faith” and more transparency about their moderation policies. A flurry of other Republican-led efforts came in January after Twitter banned Trump from its platform. Some proposals would make Section 230 protections conditional, while others would repeal the provision altogether.

Democrats have instead focused on reforming Section 230 to hold platforms accountable for harmful content like hate speech, targeted harassment and drug dealing . One proposal would require platforms to explain their moderation practices and to produce quarterly reports on content takedowns. The Senate Democrats’ SAFE Tech Act would revoke legal protections for platforms where payments are involved.

That last proposal is aimed at reining in online advertising abuses, but critics say even small changes to Section 230 could have unintended consequences for free speech on the internet. Still, experts say it’s time for change.

“Section 230 is a statute — it is not a constitutional norm, it’s not free speech — and it was written at a time when people were worried about electronic bulletin boards and newsgroups. They were not thinking about amplification, recommendations and targeted advertising,” Sylvain said. “Most people agree that the world in 1996 is not the world in 2021.”

This article was originally published by PolitiFact , which is part of the Poynter Institute. It is republished here with permission. See the sources for these facts checks here and more of their fact-checks here .

More about Section 230

What journalists should know about Communications Decency Act Section 230
Opinion: It’s time to repeal the law that gives social media sites immunity for anything their users post
Americans want some online misinformation removed, but aren’t sure who should do it

Why journalists should pay attention to developments in artificial intelligence

‘This is a very malleable space that we are in with AI, and this is where we need journalists to be the people who deeply understand the technology’

Opinion | Wall Street Journal reporter Evan Gershkovich to stand trial in Russia

Gershkovich was arrested in March 2023 on trumped-up charges of espionage. If convicted, he could face up to 20 years in prison.

Opinion | Why presidential debate moderators may need the most prep

CNN’s Jake Tapper and Dana Bash should review how local broadcast journalists question candidates — often in a refreshingly direct manner

To ban or not to ban: Donald Trump’s and Joe Biden’s mixed messages on TikTok

How Biden and Trump’s thoughts about the banning TikTok have evolved and where they each stand on the app’s future

New grant writing course for journalists and fact-checkers now available from the IFCN

The free online course was developed with Hungary’s Center for Sustainable Media

Start your day informed and inspired.

Get the Poynter newsletter that's right for you.

Research & Learn

The three arguments in support of free speech.

Protest outside Supreme Court building to show free speech defense

Use: Beyond use during digital or in-person orientations, the video can serve as a resource on university web pages explaining student speech rights and free speech defense strategies.

Complete video adaptation for online teaching (length, 6:28)
Sample remarks for in-person instruction
Additional resources for students

Three Arguments in Defense of Free Expression: Video Adaptation

Sample Remarks for In-Person Instruction

Whatever you end up doing in college, you will likely face situations where you feel pressure to censor yourself or others. These may feel like high-stakes situations where you are asked to act quickly. Maybe you are the editor of a student newspaper and you are facing pressure to remove a columnist for expressing controversial viewpoints. Or perhaps you are part of an activist group that is trying to plan how to respond to an upcoming speaker.

In this module, we will go over three central arguments that free speech advocates use to defend open discourse and debate. The first is that the pursuit of knowledge requires engaging with multiple perspectives and using them to correct and refine our own judgment. The second is that censoring a person can have the unintended effect of giving them added attention. The third is that legitimacy of government rests on the consent of the governed, and consent can be legitimate only if viewpoints are heard and not suppressed.

Let’s explore these arguments in greater depth.

Free Speech Defense 1: The Pursuit of Knowledge Requires the Competition of Multiple Perspectives

Take the example of an editor. Most professional and student newspapers have opinion sections that are meant to give readers access to competing perspectives on contemporary events. What should you do if you are an editor of a student publication and receive multiple letters demanding that a columnist be fired for expressing unpopular views on a sensitive topic, such as defunding police or the Israeli-Palestinian conflict?

Before making any decision, consider a principle articulated by 19th-century English philosopher John Stuart Mill called the “marketplace of ideas.” Mill argued that the best test of truth was to allow people with different ideas to compete with one another. Truth may not immediately win out in the marketplace, but repeated encounters with a variety of viewpoints encourages people to think critically rather than accepting whatever idea is handed to them. Even flawed or incomplete opinions were valuable, Mill argued, because they could be used to gain a “clearer perception and livelier impression of truth.”

Though it can be hard to resist the demands of angry readers, there are ways to address some of their concerns without retracting the article or firing the writer. For example, you could invite critics to submit an op-ed contesting the writer’s viewpoint. If your paper doesn’t have one, you could introduce a “letters to the editor” section so that readers can regularly respond to columns with which they disagree.

Free Speech Defense 2: Silencing Offensive Speech Can Unintentionally Give More Attention to the Speaker

Censoring speakers or their writings immediately draws attention to them and often provides a sense of martyrdom or persecution that elevates them as victims of suppression.

Some people are aware of this phenomenon, and use efforts to censor them in order to cast themselves as free speech “martyrs.” Perhaps no one has been better at this than the right-wing provocateur, Milo Yiannopolos. In 2015, Yiannapoulous was invited to speak at multiple college campuses. Many students, angered by language they found offensive about transgender people and sexual assault survivors, protested his visits. While protests are of course protected by the First Amendment, some of these protests turned into unlawful violence. During one of Yiannopoulos’ visits to the University of California, Berkeley, counter protesters smashed windows and set fire to a number of buildings. The chaos ensured that the media focus was not on Yiannopolous’ ideas, but the violent tactics of those who sought to shut him down. What ultimately pushed Yiannopoulos out of the public eye was not violent protests, but rather the media focusing on his own words — which became indefensible even to his most vehement fans.

However noxious and hateful you consider a speaker’s message may be, you should consider the possibility that censoring them or disrupting their speech might give the speaker more power. Think about it this way: if your teacher prohibits you from reading a book in class, wouldn’t that make you more likely to want to read it? The point is not that there aren’t ideas out there that are hateful or vitriolic, but that most people want to discover that for themselves. When you censor a speaker, you risk giving their viewpoints more allure by making them the “forbidden fruit.”

Free Speech Defense 3: Free Speech is Necessary for Self-Government

In a democratic form of government, the people are responsible for choosing their leaders and discussing different paths for public policy. When those in power censor unpopular opinions or limit public discussion, they are interfering with a crucial part of the democratic process and their actions can weaken the public’s trust in government. As the late Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis wrote, the Founders believed “the greatest menace to freedom is an inert people; that public discussion is a political duty; and that this should be a fundamental principle of the American government.”

You should try to keep in mind that many of the rights we currently hold dear were once considered unpopular and dangerous. When people first started advocating for abolition of slavery, the end of segregation laws, and the right for women to vote, they were widely dismissed as divisive and harmful to society. The First Amendment was one of the few tools these activists had to protect their rights. When we use our power to suppress the speech we dislike based on subjective standards, we are opening the door for future leaders to suppress the speech we cherish.

As you begin your college career, you should take time to consider what sort of campus culture you would like to help foster, and whether open discourse and debate are important to you and your educational goals. If you find yourself in a situation where you feel the urge to silence yourself or others, think back to these three arguments. They may help convince others to look for a solution to the problem that involves more speech, rather than censorship.

Additional Resources for Students

What if Instead of Calling People Out, We Called Them In?

Should We Cancel Aristotle?

Holmes Dissenting in Abrams v. United States

John Stuart Mill, On Liberty, 1869

Thomas Jeffersons First Inaugural Address

Download in-person instructions

Share this selection on Twitter
Share this selection via email

Freedom of expression in the Digital Age: Internet Censorship

Living reference work entry
First Online: 08 May 2020
Cite this living reference work entry

Md Nurul Momen 4

279 Accesses

Freedom of expression includes freedom to hold opinions and ideas and to receive and impart information without restrictions by state authorities.

Introduction

Internet is regarded as an important issue that shapes free expression in today’s volatile nature of human rights world (Momen 2020 ). In the digital age, authoritarian governments in the world always attempt to undermine political and social movement through the complete shutdown of the Internet or providing partial access to it. It is also found that the restrictions on freedom of expression on the Internet are through surveillance and monitoring the online activities. In response to any kind of political and social movement, authoritarian governments across the border occasionally shut down many websites, along with the arrest of several anti-government bloggers and political activists. However, under the international legal instruments, for instance, Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), denial of the...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Ariffin, L. J. (2012). Rais backs Dr M call for curbs to Internet freedom . https://www.malaysia-today.net/2012/06/05/rais-backs-dr-m-call-for-curbs-to-internet-freedom/ . Accessed 10 June 2018.

Arnaudo, D., Alva, A., Wood, P., & Whittington, J. (2013). Political and economic implications of authoritarian control of the internet. In J. Butts & S. Shenoi (Eds.), Critical infrastructure protection VII (IFIP AICT) (Vol. 417, pp. 3–19). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

Google Scholar

Cristiano, F. (2019). Internet access as human right: A dystopian critique from the occupied Palestinian territory. In G. Blouin-Genest, M. C. Doran, & S. Paquerot (Eds.), Human rights as battlefields (Human rights interventions). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91770-2_12 .

Chapter Google Scholar

Diamond, L. (2010). Liberation technology. Journal of Democracy, 21 (3), 69–83. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.0.0190 .

Article Google Scholar

Freedom House. (2019). Freedom on the Net . Washington DC/New York, Retrieved from https://www.freedomonthenet.org/countries-in-detail

Hill, D. T. (2002). East Timor and the Internet: Global political leverage in/on Indonesia. Indonesia, 73 , 25–51.

Kee, J. S. (2012). Bad laws won’t stop cyber crime . https://www.loyarburok.com/2012/05/28/bad-laws-stop-cyber-crime/?doing_wp_cron . Accessed 10 June 2019.

Momen, M. N. (2020). Myth and reality of freedom of expression on the Internet. International Journal of Public Administration, 43 (3), 277–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1628055 .

Nocetti, J. (2015). Contest and conquest: Russia and global Internet governance. International Affairs, 91 (1), 111–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12189 .

Randall, J. (1996). Of cracks and crackdown: Five translations of recent Internet postings. Indonesia, 62 , 37–51.

Rodan, G. (1998). The Internet and political control in Singapore. Political Science Quarterly, 113 (1), 63–89.

Shirokanova, A., & Silyutina, O. (2018). Internet regulation: A text-based approach to media coverage. In D. A. Alexandrov et al. (Eds.), Digital Transformation and Global Society (DTGS) 2018 (Communications in computer and information science (CCIS)) (Vol. 858, pp. 181–194). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02843-5_15 .

Ziccardi, G. (2013). Digital activism, internet control, transparency, censorship, surveillance and human rights: An international perspective. In Resistance, liberation technology and human rights in the digital age (Law, governance and technology series) (Vol. 7). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5276-4_6 .

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Public Administration, University of Rajshahi, Rajshahi, Bangladesh

Md Nurul Momen

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Md Nurul Momen .

Editor information

Editors and affiliations.

University of Alberta, Alberta, AB, Canada

Scott Romaniuk

University for Peace, San Jose, Costa Rica

Manish Thapa

Nemzetkozi Tanulmanyok Intezet, Rm 503, Corvinus Univ, Inst of Intl Studies, Budapest, Hungary

Péter Marton

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

About this entry

Cite this entry.

Momen, M.N. (2019). Freedom of expression in the Digital Age: Internet Censorship. In: Romaniuk, S., Thapa, M., Marton, P. (eds) The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Global Security Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74336-3_31-1

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74336-3_31-1

Received : 15 March 2018

Accepted : 29 June 2019

Published : 08 May 2020

Publisher Name : Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

Print ISBN : 978-3-319-74336-3

Online ISBN : 978-3-319-74336-3

eBook Packages : Springer Reference Political Science and International Studies Reference Module Humanities and Social Sciences Reference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Find a journal
Track your research

Numbers, Facts and Trends Shaping Your World

Read our research on:

Full Topic List

Regions & Countries

Publications
Our Methods
Short Reads
Tools & Resources

Read Our Research On:

More so than adults, U.S. teens value people feeling safe online over being able to speak freely

Teens and adults in the United States differ on a key issue tied to online speech and its consequences. A majority of teens ages 13 to 17 say a welcoming, safe online environment is more important than people being able to speak their minds freely online, according to a new Pew Research Center survey. A separate survey of Americans 18 and older shows that adults’ views on the same question are more evenly divided.

A bar chart showing that a majority of U.S. teens say people feeling welcome and safe online is more important than being able to speak freely, while a smaller share of adults say this

Overall, 62% of teens say people being able to feel welcome and safe online is more important than people being able to speak their minds freely online, while 38% hold the opposite view. By comparison, half of adults say a welcoming and safe online environment is more important, while a similar share (47%) put more value on people being able to speak their minds freely online.

Adults ages 18 to 29 differ from their younger teen counterparts on this question. Some 57% of adults in this age group favor the idea that people should be able to speak their minds freely online. Those 65 and older, by contrast, are the only age group whose views are similar to teens’: 58% of these Americans say feeling welcome and safe online is more important.

Pew Research Center conducted these studies to understand teens’ and adults’ views about online speech and the broader online environment. This analysis relies on data from two separate surveys. For the analysis of teens, the Center conducted an online survey of 1,316 U.S. teens from April 14-May 4, 2022, via Ipsos. Ipsos recruited the teens via their parents who were a part of its KnowledgePanel , a probability-based web panel recruited primarily through national, random sampling of residential addresses. The teen results are weighted to be representative of U.S. teens ages 13 to 17 who live with parents by age, gender, race, ethnicity, household income and other categories. The research was reviewed and approved by an external institutional review board, Advarra, which is an independent committee of experts that specializes in helping to protect the rights of research participants.

For the separate analysis of adults, the Center surveyed 3,581 U.S. adults from March 21-27, 2022. All adults who took part in the survey are members of the Center’s American Trends Panel (ATP), an online survey panel that is recruited through national, random sampling of residential addresses. This way nearly all U.S. adults have a chance of selection. The survey of adults is weighted to be representative of the U.S. adult population by gender, race, ethnicity, partisan affiliation, education and other categories. Read more about the ATP’s methodology .

Here are the questions used for the survey of teens, along with its methodology ; and here are the questions used for the survey of adults, and its methodology .

A bar chart showing that about six-in-ten U.S. teens think people take offensive content online too seriously; views of adults under 65 are largely similar

But there is also nuance in people’s views of online speech. For example, when asked which of two statements about the way people react to offensive content online comes closer to their view, the majority of teens (59%) think that many people take such content too seriously, as do 54% of adults. Smaller shares in both groups believe offensive content online is too often excused as “not a big deal” (40% of teens and 44% of adults).

Similar to teens, about six-in-ten adults ages 18 to 29 (62%) say offensive content is taken too seriously, as do 56% of those ages 30 to 64. By contrast, just 41% of adults 65 and older say the same.

These new results are from two Center surveys – one of U.S. teens ages 13 to 17 conducted April 14-May 4, 2022, and one of U.S. adults conducted March 21-27, 2022. They come in the wake of heightened bipartisan calls for tech companies to address cyberbullying and create a safe environment for teens. They also come amid continued court battles over whether schools can impose consequences on adolescents for what they say online – and broader debates about people being banned by social media platforms or “ canceled ” by their peers.

Politics shapes views about online discourse among both teens and adults

In both surveys, Americans’ views on these topics break sharply along partisan lines. But regardless of what party they identify with or lean toward, teens are more likely than adults with similar partisan leanings to say allowing for safe spaces online is more important than being able to speak freely online.

A bar chart showing that adults’ and teens’ views of online discourse are split along political lines – but regardless of party, greater shares of teens than adults back safe spaces online

Some 71% of teens who identify as Democrats or lean toward the Democratic Party say this, compared with 62% of Democratic and Democratic-leaning adults. About half of Republican-identifying or GOP-leaning teens (49%) also back a welcoming and safe environment – 13 percentage points greater than the share of Republican and GOP-leaning adults (36%) who hold the same view.

Among both teens and adults, though, there are substantial differences by party. Republican teens are 23 points more likely than Democratic teens to say being able to speak freely online is more important. Among adults, Republicans are 26 points more likely than Democrats to say the same. Democratic adults instead are more likely to favor welcoming, safe spaces by the same margin.

On the question of offensive content, teens’ and adults’ views within each party are similar. Gaps between parties emerge for both teens and adults: Democratic teens are more likely than Republican teens to say that offensive content online is too often excused as not a big deal (50% vs. 27%), and there is a similar pattern for Democratic versus Republican adults (55% vs. 32%). By comparison, 72% of Republican teens and 67% of Republican adults say many take offensive content they see online too seriously.

Among adults, views on these topics within each political party have continued to evolve over the past several years. In 2017, when Pew Research Center first asked adults these questions, Democrats and Republicans held largely similar views about the balance of online safe spaces versus freedom of expression. That changed in 2020 and the partisan split on this question has widened from 16 to 26 points in the past two years. On the question about offensive content online, the partisan gap among adults has slightly narrowed since 2020 but remains pronounced. Adults’ overall views on this question have remained largely unchanged during this period.

A line graph showing that over the past two years, Republicans and Democrats have become increasingly divided on priorities for the online environment; they are also split on the seriousness of offensive content online

The changes since 2020 are largely driven by those at the ideological poles in their respective parties. The share of conservative Republican adults who say free speech is more important in this context has risen from 57% in 2020 to 68% today, even as the view that offensive content is taken too seriously among that group has dipped somewhat from 74% to 67%. Liberal Democrats are now slightly more likely to think offensive content is taken too seriously than in 2020 (rising from 31% to 39%), but the majority of this group think it’s too often excused as not a big deal (61% say this today, compared with 68% in 2020).

Attitudes among teens, adults also differ by demographic factors

Views of the online environment that teens and adults encounter also vary by race, ethnicity and gender.

For example, Black and Hispanic teens are more likely than their White peers to say that feeling welcome and safe online is more important than free speech online, and that offensive content is too often excused as not a big deal.

A bar chart showing that Black and Hispanic teens are more likely than White teens to prioritize safety online over free speech and to think offensive content is too often excused as not a big deal

Among adults, those who are Black (60%) are more likely than either White (50%) or Hispanic (46%) adults to prioritize feeling welcome and safe. Black adults are also more likely than Hispanic adults to say offensive content is too often excused as not a big deal (51% vs. 38%). The views of White and Hispanic adults are statistically similar on both questions. (There were not enough Asian teens or adults in the samples to be broken out into a separate analysis. As always, their responses are incorporated into the general population figures throughout this analysis.)

Teen girls are also more likely than teen boys to prioritize feeling welcome and safe and to say offensive content is too often excused. Similarly, adult women (58%) are more likely than adult men (42%) to value a welcoming, safe environment and to feel people too often excuse offensive material as not a big deal (50% vs. 38%).

In many cases, differences are still present when accounting for other relevant characteristics that may be playing a role. Differences in by party and gender remain among teens on both questions when controlling for other factors, as do differences by race and ethnicity for views of offensive content. Among adults, party, age and gender matter after controlling for demographics.

Note: Here are the questions used for the survey of teens, along with its methodology ; and here are the questions used for the survey of adults, and its methodology .

Free Speech & Press
Politics Online
Social Media
Teens & Tech

Colleen McClain is a research associate focusing on internet and technology research at Pew Research Center .

Americans’ Views of Technology Companies

Most americans say a free press is highly important to society, most americans favor restrictions on false information, violent content online, freedom of speech and lgbt rights: americans’ views of issues in supreme court case, most u.s. journalists are concerned about press freedoms, most popular.

1615 L St. NW, Suite 800 Washington, DC 20036 USA (+1) 202-419-4300 | Main (+1) 202-857-8562 | Fax (+1) 202-419-4372 | Media Inquiries

Research Topics

Email Newsletters

ABOUT PEW RESEARCH CENTER Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan fact tank that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping the world. It conducts public opinion polling, demographic research, media content analysis and other empirical social science research. Pew Research Center does not take policy positions. It is a subsidiary of The Pew Charitable Trusts .

Videos & Photos
Take Action

Technology and Rights

The internet and other technologies are critical tools to defend rights and hold powerful actors to account. But technology can also be used in ways that curtail rights and deepen inequality. We defend human rights in the digital age. We document how governments and companies restrict online speech and access to information. We investigate how digital surveillance tools, from hacking to facial recognition, are used to target activists, racial and ethnic minorities and workers. We expose the impact of AI and other data-driven technologies on the rights of workers and people living with poverty. We advocate for laws and policies that promote privacy, digital inclusion, and respect for human rights by social media platforms.

June 12, 2024

June 10, 2024

Members of the European Parliament sit in the plenary chamber of the European Parliament during a vote. Among other things, MEPs will vote today on a free trade agreement with Vietnam.

May 15, 2024

Intentionally targeting civilians is a war crime

On October 13, 2023, Israeli strikes in southern Lebanon killed Issam Abdullah, a Reuters journalist. The attack injured six other journalists from Reuters, Agence France-Presse (AFP),

and Al Jazeera.

SOUNDBITE: Dylan Collins AFP Journalist

I will always remember his, his wit and his humor. He was the dynamo of the press scene and of Reuters in general.

SOUNDBITE: Carmen Joukhadar Al Jazeera Journalist

I don’t think there is anyone that is funnier than Issam. I don’t think there’s anyone more supportive than Issam.

Human Rights Watch investigated the attack to determine the cause, who carried it out and its legality.

I don't know what justice looks like. We lost someone and he’s not coming back. And Christina [injured AFP colleague], her life will never be the same. I don't know how you, I don't know how you replace that. For me, justice, the only type of justice that we can get now is accountability.

Visual evidence suggests that Israeli forces targeted the journalists, who were filming at a known live position far from military targets. The attacks were likely deliberate and an apparent war crime.

We’re a group of seven journalists, all wearing press vests, all wearing helmets with cameras, with three live feeds for three international agencies. And we were hit twice directly in a matter of 37 seconds.

The digital investigations team at Human Rights Watch verified 49 videos and dozens of photos from before, during and after the incident, analyzed satellite imagery of the area,

interviewed witnesses, and consulted with arms and audio experts. Among the visual evidence collated by Human Rights Watch is the feed from the cameras of the journalists who were there that day.

Just before 5 p.m. on October 13th the seven journalists from Reuters, Agence France-Presse and Al Jazeera congregated in Alma Al-Shaab in southern Lebanon, roughly one to two kilometers from the Israeli border.

For us it was a good location because we were able to film the strikes without putting our lives at risk.

They were there to report on clashes between the Israeli military and Lebanese and Palestinian armed groups in southern Lebanon.

When we arrived around 5 p.m. We were really only just filming this this huge pillar of smoke that was coming, rising up beyond a hill to our south, along the border. And maybe about 15 minutes later, we started to see incoming shelling from the Israeli side hitting the

the areas in Lebanon along the border. We were calm, collected, working as safe as you can in this kind of environment.

Evidence reviewed by Human Rights Watch indicates that the Israeli military knew or should have known that the group of people they were firing on were civilians.

Around 5:54, Elie Brakhia, an Al Jazeera journalist, took a selfie with Issam Abdallah, the Reuters journalist, with the sun setting behind them.  “Good evening,” Elie texted, in Arabic.  

So around a little bit before 6 p.m., about one minute before we were hit, there was a what looked to be a tank fire fired from the “Hanita military base (in Israel),” fired across the valley

into a hilltop, basically maybe a kilometer and half away from us.

And I took out my phone to take a video of it. And basically, as soon as I took out my phone to take a video, I was going to inform our newsroom about the development. And as soon as I took out my phone, we were hit the first time. But basically big explosion.

The first one. I looked to my right and I saw my colleague Christina on the ground screaming,

saying, “I can't feel my legs.”

Human Rights Watch has verified footage from four cameras that caught captured the first attack. The first strike directly hit and killed Issam Abdallah, who was near the short rock wall.

I see a flame and soil and then I hear the sound. I see Christina and I see Issam. And then I run in the other direction. I go to the car, our car the Al Jazeera car. I sit next to it for a little bit. But then I told myself no, cars are targets. This is what they tell you in training. So as I was running to get away from it......another missile hit the car. And it exploded, all of it.

And this is what caused all the shrapnel in my back because I was running to get away.

Getting hit once or firing once could be a mistake. But there were two direct it was two direct shots at us. You can't say that's a mistake.

Audio analysis, witness testimony and satellite images reviewed by Human Rights Watch suggests that at least one munition was fired from Israeli territory, approximately 1.5 kilometers to the southeast. Analysis of the video taken in the minutes before the attack further suggests that the group was targeted by the Israeli military.

Three cameras captured the same scene, but in each one light appears to be either static, blinking, or absent, depending on the camera. Experts said this could suggest the

use of infrared targeting or range-finding technology, suggesting the Israeli military was actively observing the journalists and proceeded to target them.

We lost a colleague. My colleague has, life altering injuries, and I want to know, I want to know who pulled the trigger.

Today it was us. Tomorrow it will be someone else. Justice is that those who committed all these crimes are held accountable.

Since Human Rights Watch began this investigation, two journalists, Rabih Al-Maamari and Farah Omar were reportedly killed in an Israeli strike in the southern Lebanese town of Tayr Harfa, some 2.3 kilometers from where Issam Abdullah was killed.

At least 61 journalists have been killed in the hostilities in Israel and Gaza, according to the Committee to Project Journalists. The committee said the first month of hostilities marked “the deadliest month for journalists” since they began documenting journalist fatalities in 1992.

Journalists are protected under international humanitarian law against direct attacks. Targeting journalists constitutes a breach of the Geneva Conventions.  

Intentionally or indiscriminately attacking civilians is a war crime.  

“The main element of “Digital India” is a digitally literate India, a capable India, a prosperous India...”

This is the vision of “Digital India.”

The "Digital India” project aims to use technology to deliver government programs and public services.

The internet is key to making this happen.

But Digital India faces one big challenge...Internet shutdowns.

Since 2018, India has shut down the internet more than any other country in the world.

State authorities have repeatedly cut off mobile internet.

These shutdowns impact most of the population in the affected area since 96% of India’s internet subscribers access it on their phones.

Without the internet, people can’t reach government food and work programs or conduct activities like banking.

“Digital India has become a way of life particularly for the poor, marginalized and for those in government.”

But it is poor and marginalized communities who are the most harmed during internet shutdowns, when government services get disrupted, affecting their human rights.

Right to food

People can’t receive subsidized food grains if they are unable to authenticate their biometric IDs using the internet.

Internet blackouts in rural areas mean families could go hungry for days.

Rights to employment and social security

The government’s rural income security program, NREGA, requires workers to mark their attendance online.

These women laborers have to upload a geo-tagged photo online to prove that they have showed up for work.

“Last month, we worked for 15 days but we only got paid for 12 days because the [inter]net did not work.” Community supervisor, NREGA

Indian authorities say they shut down the internet to maintain public order.

But we found authorities use internet shutdowns for various other reasons, including to curb peaceful protests and prevent cheating on school exams.

The government’s longest imposed blackout lasted for 550 days in Jammu and Kashmir.

There’s no evidence that internet shutdowns help maintain law and order.

Instead, they undermine free expression and act as a form of collective punishment that disproportionately impacts marginalized communities.

Indian authorities should end the shutdowns.

They should ensure that everyone has equal access to public services and social protection programs, even when the internet is not available.

Digital India should ensure that technology protects people’s livelihoods and rights.

“We Couldn’t Wait”

Digital Metering at the US-Mexico Border

Meta’s Broken Promises

Systemic Censorship of Palestine Content on Instagram and Facebook

“No Internet Means No Work, No Pay, No Food”

Internet Shutdowns Deny Access to Basic Rights in “Digital India”

Automated Neglect

How The World Bank’s Push to Allocate Cash Assistance Using Algorithms Threatens Rights

Letter Urging Meta to Maintain CrowdTangle Tool Through Upcoming Elections

Un: revise ‘pact for the future’ to focus on rights.

Countries Should Prioritize Economic Justice, Healthy Environment

Greek Court Deems Surveillance Powers Unconstitutional

Court Demands Stricter Safeguards on State Monitoring

The Council of State of Greece building in Athens, July 14, 2015.

India: Technology Use Shouldn’t Undermine Free, Fair Elections

Q&A Addresses Tech Firms, Misuse of Personal Data, Incitement to Violence

School teachers with the colors of the Indian national flag painted on their faces participate in an event to raise awareness among people to vote in the upcoming general elections

India’s General Elections, Technology, and Human Rights Questions and Answers

A model of a woman's finger pressing the button of an electronic voting machine

Women’s Voices Have Power to Drive Change

Freedom of Expression Key to Demanding Rights

Activists sing during a rally to support women's rights on International Women's Day in Buenos Aires, March 8, 2023.

Türkiye: Big Tech Should Protect Online Expression, Resist Censorship

Rigorous transparency measures needed as government pressure grows

People check their phones at a market in central Istanbul, Türkiye, July 18, 2019.

Human Rights Watch Submission to the UN Human Rights Committee Review of the United Kingdom

February 2024

A Human Rights Guide to the 2024 US Elections

Vital Recommendations for Voters, Candidates, and Supporters of Democracy

A view of the U.S. Capitol Building in Washington, D.C., on May 28, 2020.

Submission to the Special Rapporteur on the Right to Education

Academic Freedom and Freedom of Expression in Educational Institutions

Daily Brief

Jun 13, 2024

Georgia Is Following Russia into a Nightmare; Quick Takes: Haiti; Oklahoma, US; Greece; Readers’ Recommendations; Daily Video; Weekly Quiz!

samdubberley

notzachcampbell

techchildrights

Get updates on human rights issues from around the globe. Join our movement today.

Share full article

The Morning

The internet and the first amendment.

We explore the upcoming legal rulings that will shape online life.

By David McCabe

I cover technology policy.

Here is a puzzle at the center of online life: How should we balance freedom of speech with the flood of slanderous statements, extremist manifestoes and conspiracy theories that proliferate on the internet? The United States decided decades ago to let private companies solve that quandary themselves. The Supreme Court made this position official in three major rulings in the 1990s and early 2000s.

But lawmakers aren’t sure about this arrangement, now that giant online platforms are the new town square. The left says Facebook, YouTube, TikTok and the rest should take more content down, especially hate speech and disinformation. The right says the companies, which removed posts about Covid and the 2020 election, shouldn’t set the rules for discussions about politics and culture.

Now a series of federal court cases will address these questions. Supreme Court justices will decide a few in the next month or two. In today’s newsletter, I’ll explain how those cases could change the way the First Amendment functions in the internet era.

The decisions

Courts have faced six broad questions about online speech. The Supreme Court has ruled on two of them.

When can social media sites be sued over what users post? Rarely. Two Supreme Court rulings last year kept protections in place for websites from most lawsuits related to content posted by users. Relatives of victims of terrorist attacks had argued that Google and Twitter should be legally responsible for content posted by the Islamic State. The justices disagreed.

Can government officials block constituents on social media? Sometimes. The Supreme Court ruled in March that public officials can’t stop a constituent from commenting on their posts if they are acting in their role as political officeholders.

The questions

Four other philosophical questions are still in progress.

Can the government force social media sites to host political content? Twitter, YouTube and Facebook suspended Donald Trump in 2021 after the Jan. 6 riot. Then Florida and Texas passed laws designed to restrict such moves. The Supreme Court will soon rule on those laws, and the justices appeared skeptical of them during oral arguments in February, my colleague Adam Liptak reported.

When can the United States push social media sites to remove content? The government prodded social media services to take down certain posts related to Covid and elections. Missouri, Louisiana and five individuals argued that’s a violation of the First Amendment. They say the government used private companies to stifle a specific viewpoint. The Supreme Court seemed wary of the lawsuit in March. The justices’ skepticism of conservatives’ argument is a sign of how complex it is to draw boundaries in this area of the law.

Can the government restrict access to online pornography? Texas passed a law last year that requires adult sites to check the age of their visitors. Parents can sue sites if the sites fail to do so and their child views pornography. If the law stands, adults will need to reveal their identity to pornography sites instead of remaining anonymous. The sites say this puts a barrier between adults and speech they have a right to view under the Constitution. The case is now in federal appeals court.

Can the government ban a foreign-owned social media platform? President Biden signed a law in April that will ban TikTok unless it is sold by its Chinese parent company, citing national security. TikTok says the measure curtails free speech rights — both its own and its users’. Federal courts are planning to hear the case this year. If they uphold the law, it will affirm the federal government’s right to eliminate a platform for speech in the national interest. If judges strike it down, it may allow news and social media sites to serve Americans even when they are owned by a company from an enemy nation.

What this means for users

With this many kinds of cases, the range of outcomes is vast. If the courts decide the status quo is wrong, internet platforms might limit what you can post — or take down more of it — just to be sure they are complying with the laws.

Another possibility: The courts could decide that they got this question right the first time they considered it, 30 years ago. Free speech online might not change much. But private companies would now formally be entrenched as its arbiter.

We are having trouble retrieving the article content.

Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.

Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.

Thank you for your patience while we verify access.

Already a subscriber? Log in .

Want all of The Times? Subscribe .

With no teleprompter, Trump riffs with crowd at Las Vegas rally, vows to end taxes on tips

LAS VEGAS — Former President Donald Trump made stamina a theme of his rally Sunday in 104-degree heat at a Las Vegas park.

About 6,900 people attended, according to a crowd estimate by Las Vegas Metro police. Six people were transported to the hospital for heat-related illness, an LVMPD spokesperson said.

Speaking two days before Nevada’s primary, Trump did not endorse anyone in the U.S. Senate’s Republican race, where Army veteran Sam Brown and Trump's former ambassador to Iceland, Jeff Gunter, had hoped to get a nod.

Trump unveiled a new proposal he said he’d never mentioned publicly before that would be among his priorities — ending taxes on tips, a likely winner in Nevada, whose casino and entertainment economy depends on tips.

The pledge on tips adds one more detail to a Trump tax plan that has included vague pledges of tax relief to middle-income workers and small businesses.

"So this is the first time I've said this, and for those hotel workers and people that get tips you're going to be very happy because when I get to office, we are going to not charge taxes on tips people (are) making," Trump told a crowd of several thousand people.

Trump said he would "do that right away, first thing in office," and noted in prepared remarks that he would seek legislation in Congress to make the change. "You do a great job of service, you take care of people and I think it's going to be something that really is deserved."

He has previously pledged to make permanent the Republican-passed individual tax cuts that he signed into law in 2017, but which expire at the end of 2025. Tax experts estimate that doing so would raise U.S. deficits by some $4 trillion over a decade compared to current forecasts.

Technical difficulties during rally

Constant problems with his teleprompter were reported, and he vowed not to pay the company behind it.

"I don’t pay contractors who do (expletive) work," Trump said.

The lack of prepared remarks allowed for a looser speech where he often engaged in crowd participation like a standup comic, asking who should be his vice presidential running mate (no consensus) and whether "Sleepy Joe" or "Crooked Joe" was a better nickname for Biden.

One tangent involved whether he’d prefer to be eaten by a shark or electrocuted.

“I'll take electrocution every single time,” Trump said.

Viktor Orbán, Jack Smith, and Jesus Christ mentioned at rally

Over the course of his hourlong speech, Trump included a litany of prominent people he considered stupid.

Among them was Jack Smith, the special counsel overseeing criminal investigations into Trump's actions regarding the Jan. 6 U.S. Capitol riot and his handling of classified documents.

“He’s a dumb son of a bitch,” Trump said.

On the other hand, he praised "the great Victor Orbán," Hungary’s authoritarian leader whom he quoted as saying that the only way the world can be saved is to elect Trump.

Trump described Biden and Democratic policies as so ridiculous that "the only way they can beat us is to cheat."

Because of this, he urged everyone to vote in November with turnout that’s "too big to rig," a refrain used by many of the dozen speakers who preceded him in a dirt field at Sunset Park.

U.S. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene was one. She compared the former president, who was recently convicted of 34 felonies by a New York jury, to Jesus Christ.

“The person I worship was also a convicted felon, and he was crucified on a Roman cross,” she said.

Mark Robison is the state politics reporter for the Reno Gazette-Journal, with occasional forays into other topics. Email comments to [email protected] or comment on Mark’s Greater Reno Facebook page .

Contributing: Reuters

Israel-Gaza War
War in Ukraine
UK General Election
US & Canada
UK Politics
N. Ireland Politics
Scotland Politics
Wales Politics
Latin America
Middle East
In Pictures
Future of Business
Technology of Business
Work Culture
Science & Health
Artificial Intelligence
Film & TV
Art & Design
Entertainment News
Destinations
Australia and Pacific
Caribbean & Bermuda
Central America
North America
South America
World’s Table
Culture & Experiences
The SpeciaList
Natural Wonders
Weather & Science
Climate Solutions
Sustainable Business
Green Living

Putin lays out his terms for ceasefire in Ukraine

Kate making 'good progress' and to attend royal event, us supreme court lifts ban on gun bump stocks, aid convoy denied entry to northern gaza, un says, boeing plane investigated after 'dutch roll', watch: how 'tapping therapy' can help calm your mind, 'only elegant women allowed': s korea gym draws flak for sign, euro 2024: rampant germany hunt for fourth against 10-man scotland, alex jones assets liquidated to pay sandy hook debt, us sanctions israeli group over attacks on gaza aid.

USA reach Super 8s but Ireland eliminated after washout

Co-hosts USA reach the Super 8s stage of the T20 World Cup after a washout against Ireland in Florida.

Pope Francis greets Jimmy Fallon as he meets with comedians during a cultural event at the Vatican, June 14, 2024

Pope meets Jimmy Fallon and 105 other comics at Vatican

Other big names, including Whoopi Goldberg and Conan O'Brien, were also present at the audience.

REM perform for the first time since 2007

The band reunite to play of Losing My Religion as they are inducted to the Songwriters Hall Of Fame.

Latest updates

Socialists, Green, Communists and France Unbowed

French left forms 'Popular Front' to fight far right

France's left-wing parties say they have united to take on National Rally in snap elections.

ANC and DA agree on South Africa unity government

The African National Congress and the Democratic Alliance will put aside their decades-long rivalry to work together.

Mohamed Bazoum speaks at the opening ceremony for the Cop26 summit at the Scottish Event Campus (SEC) in Glasgow. Picture date: Monday November 1, 2021.

President toppled in Niger coup loses immunity

It clears the way for Mohamed Bazoum, 64, to be tried on treason charges by a military court.

UK can do better than Johnson's 'botched' post-Brexit trade deal - Starmer

The Labour leader is asked if he's prepared to get closer to the EU to help trade and improve growth.

File image of three women standing in line to vote at a polling station

Six swing states set to decide the US election

Experts say Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin could hold the key to the White House.

What are bump stocks? US Supreme court lifts ban

Before the Supreme Court's ruling, guns using the device were classified as a machine gun and banned.

A line of shotguns and rifles on display at a US gunstore

Majority US gun owners store weapons unsafely - report

Roughly half of American gun owners keep a loaded firearm unsecured in their home.

A landmark moment in South Africa for a humbled ANC

South Africa unveils a government of national unity but the country still faces many key challenges.

Memorial at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida

Mixed emotions over demolition of Parkland shooting site

Relatives of slain students say they feel mixed emotions as the site of the deadly attack is torn down.

IMAGES

Debate on Internet in Favour Topic in 10-15 Mins in English
Speech On Internet
Debate on Internet in Favour Topic in 10-15 Mins in English
🌷 Speech on topic internet. Speech on Internet in simple and easy words
debate writing on internet in favour
🌷 Speech on topic internet. Speech on Internet in simple and easy words

VIDEO

Unpacking the New AI Executive Order: A Game Changer for Tech
Informative Speech example by Robin Fletcher
A super and informative speech (seminar) on Mobile phone
From Radio to TikTok: Adapting Democratic Principles in the Digital Age
Unlocking AI Potential For Building Truthful Systems, Preemptively Outsmarting NWO Math Rationing?
Artificial Intelligence & Data Is CRITICAL: The Mad Rush To Understand & Control This Pivotal Tech

COMMENTS

Debate on Internet in Favour Topic in 10-15 Mins in English
Debate on internet in favour will prove that the Internet is always a very important tool in development if used correctly. There are many positive points which prove it to be very useful in modern life. The Internet is the best source for gathering any type of information. People will learn a subject thoroughly because of the internet.
Debate on Internet [In Favour and Against]
Arguments in Favour Of Internet Argument 1: Advantages of the Internet in Fostering Global Connectivity and Knowledge Sharing. The Internet is a powerful tool that has transformed the way we connect and share knowledge on a global scale. Through its vast network, people from different corners of the world can communicate, collaborate, and learn ...
Speech on Importance Of Internet
The Internet makes our world smaller. Think about it. We can talk to anyone, anywhere, any time. You can chat with your friend from the next city or even from the other side of the world. The Internet erases the lines on the map, making us all neighbors. Learning is easier with the Internet. Type a question into Google and you get your answer.
The internet cannot replace classroom teaching. Write a debate in favor
There are many benefits of using the internet in the classroom but they cannot replace teachers. They cannot show compassion for students as teachers do. I would like to conclude by saying that while the internet provides only information, teachers provide lifelong knowledge and wisdom, which stays with the student for a long time. Thank you!
Speech on The Internet in English For Students
Long Speech on the Internet. A heartfelt welcome to all of you present. I want to take this opportunity and share a few thoughts with you about the internet. The ushering of the 21st century has brought about a host of changes, the advent of the internet being one of them. To put it in simpler terms, the internet is a virtual network that ...
Arguments for And Against the Use of Social Media
On the other hand, there are many positive arguments for using social media. One advantage of using it is that it facilitates access to information. Owing to social media, young people grow up ...
Speech on Internet for Students and Children
Speech for Students. Very good morning to all. Today, I am here to present a speech on internet. Someone has rightly said that the world is a small place. With the advent of the internet, this saying seems realistic. The internet has really bought the world together and the distance between two persons is really not a distance today.
A for and against essay about the internet
Instructions. Preparation. Reading. Check your writing: grouping - ideas. Check your writing: gap fill - useful phrases. Worksheets and downloads. A for and against essay about the internet - exercises 592.59 KB. A for and against essay about the internet - answers 136.91 KB. A for and against essay about the internet - essay 511.93 KB.
Speech on Internet for Students & Children in English [3 Minutes]
Speech on Internet: Internet is one of the smartest revolutionary inventions of mankind. It has broken distance barriers and made the world a small place to live in. With the internet, we can access any information at our fingertips at lightning speeds. We require computers/ laptops/ smartphones to access the internet easily. 4G technologies ...
An Argumentative essay: The Internet
There are some arguments both for and against. One positive aspect of the internet is convenience. Firstly, you can communicate with people all over the world. Secondly, you can find any information in the web. Thirdly, it's easier to do shopping online because it saves your time, money and energy. Furthermore, you can watch TV, listen to ...
3 Minute Speech on Internet in English for Students
There are many benefits of using the internet. One of the major benefits of using the internet is that it provides vast amounts of information. You can find any type of information on the internet very easily. Internet has made everything easy and possible for human beings. We can connect globally with people all around the world with the help ...
Internet
The Internet is a communications medium, and people have raised objections to speech online just as they have to speech in the real world. The Internet allows for a variety of media—text, pictures, movies, and sound—and PORNOGRAPHY is abundantly accessible online in all these forms. It is commonly "posted" as coded information to a part of ...
In Favor of the Public Interest: Social Media Should be Regulated
Germany now regulates social media content via the Network Enforcement Act, aka NetzDG, by mandating that social media providers comply with government guidelines on blocking hate speech, defamation, and other illegal content. Fines go up to $56 million per violation. 4. The government should continue to provide research funding for private ...
What does freedom of speech mean in the internet era?
The EU's Digital Services Act, approved in 2022, is meant to prohibitshadow banning. In India, users trying to broach touchy subjects online have allegedthat it's happened. And in Mexico, some critics have actually advocatedfor more shadow banning of criminal cartels. 'A euphemism for censorship'.
What you need to know about Section 230, the 'most ...
The court, in its first look at free speech on the Internet, was asked to uphold a law that made it a crime to put indecent words or pictures online where children can find them. They struck it ...
The Three Arguments in Support of Free Speech
In this module, we will go over three central arguments that free speech advocates use to defend open discourse and debate. The first is that the pursuit of knowledge requires engaging with multiple perspectives and using them to correct and refine our own judgment. The second is that censoring a person can have the unintended effect of giving ...
Freedom of expression in the Digital Age: Internet Censorship
Internet is regarded as an important issue that shapes free expression in today's volatile nature of human rights world (Momen 2020 ). In the digital age, authoritarian governments in the world always attempt to undermine political and social movement through the complete shutdown of the Internet or providing partial access to it.
Views of free speech and online safety: Teens, adults differ
Adults ages 18 to 29 differ from their younger teen counterparts on this question. Some 57% of adults in this age group favor the idea that people should be able to speak their minds freely online. Those 65 and older, by contrast, are the only age group whose views are similar to teens': 58% of these Americans say feeling welcome and safe ...
(PDF) Need of Internet Control and Censorship
This paper investigates the need for internet control. surveillance, self-censorship, website blocking, and DNS blocking. The. access, loss of trust, and threats to human rights. The paper ...
PDF Online Speech and the First Amendment: Ten Principles from the Supreme
1. The First Amendment's protections apply to online speech as much as to offline speech. The First Amendment provides that "Congress shall make no law . . . prohibiting the freedom of speech." This core principle applies whether the speech in question is shared in a public square or on the internet. As the Supreme
Moderating online content: fighting harm or silencing dissent?
In recent months, the world has seen growing criticism levelled against social media companies regarding how they moderate user content. These companies often face critical human rights dilemmas: aggressively combating what is viewed as harmful content risks silencing 'protected speech': speech that, under international law, should be ...
Technology and Rights
The internet and other technologies are critical tools to defend rights and hold powerful actors to account. But technology can also be used in ways that curtail rights and deepen inequality. We ...
The Internet and the First Amendment
The government prodded social media services to take down certain posts related to Covid and elections. Missouri, Louisiana and five individuals argued that's a violation of the First Amendment ...
To what extent are you in favor of free speech on the internet?
I'm in favor of free speech on the internet, but recognize that social media companies can regulate speech on their platform. While I dislike many of them banning comments because some moderator / viewer interpretated - miscontrued a comment(s) as hate speech, when in reality it was the moderate / viewer not liking the opposing political ...
Joe Biden misreads Thomas Jefferson's quote
WASHINGTON, DC: During a speech in favor of gun control on Tuesday, June 11, President Joe Biden misrepresented the Second Amendment's prohibition on gun ownership and botched a well-known quote ...
'They're doing him a favor': Trump trolled as Nicolle Wallace calls out
She highlighted various notable moments from Trump's speech, including his complaints about a malfunctioning teleprompter, threats to withhold payment from contractors responsible for its setup ...
Supreme Court Sides With NRA in Free Speech Case
Justices revived the gun-rights group's lawsuit alleging a New York regulator violated the First Amendment by pressuring companies to cut ties with the organization.
In Supreme Court NRA ruling, justices issue unanimous decision in favor
The NRA called the win a 'historic moment' in its fight for freedom. In a unanimous ruling, the Supreme Court revived a NRA lawsuit against New York regulators.
Donald Trump at Las Vegas rally: No more taxation of income from tips
With no teleprompter, Trump riffs with crowd at Las Vegas rally, vows to end taxes on tips. LAS VEGAS — Former President Donald Trump made stamina a theme of his rally Sunday in 104-degree heat ...
BBC News Channel
Watch live breaking news from around the world 24 hours a day every day on the BBC News channel