joint venture essay

• Lifestyles & Social Issues
• Philosophy & Religion
• Politics, Law & Government
• World History
• Health & Medicine
• Browse Biographies
• Birds, Reptiles & Other Vertebrates
• Bugs, Mollusks & Other Invertebrates
• Environment
• Fossils & Geologic Time
• Geography & Travel
• Entertainment & Pop Culture
• Sports & Recreation
• Visual Arts

• Introduction

Why companies set up joint ventures

Types of joint ventures, challenges of joint ventures, the bottom line.

How joint ventures help companies expand opportunities

Joint ventures are collaborative business arrangements where two or more parties come together to form a new entity or partnership. The partners in the joint venture use contracts or a new corporate entity to pool resources, expertise, and capital in pursuit of a common business objective.

Although joint ventures are common, there is no single legal definition or accepted structure. Each deal requires careful consideration of its advantages and challenges.

• Joint ventures allow companies to share resources and generate profits.
• Several legal structures can be used to create a joint venture.
• Joint ventures require ongoing management to succeed.

Joint ventures allow two or more companies to work together on a new project, sharing the financial and operational risks in the process. They are commonly used for government contracting, international expansion, and bringing new technologies to market.

The different partners bring different things to the table. For example, a joint venture might help a company with strong research and innovative products find new markets through a partnership with a company that knows how to sell in different parts of the world. Or a company with technology for consumer use might enter into a joint venture to adapt and sell its products for business applications.

Joint venture examples

• Expertise sharing. In 2000, office software and cloud computing giant Microsoft (MSFT) teamed up with management consultant Accenture (ACN) in a joint venture called Avanade , which uses the strengths of both companies to help clients solve enterprise business problems.
• International expansion. In 2012, Starbucks (SBUX) partnered with Tata Global Beverages, part of Indian conglomerate Tata Group , to form TATA Starbucks Ltd , which allowed the coffee giant to access and quickly expand in the India market.
• Shared project vision. In 2016, ride-sharing platform Uber (UBER) joined forces with Swedish automaker Volvo to develop self-driving cars.
• Cost-cutting and/or other efficiencies. This may take the form of a vertical supply-chain efficiency (such as Coca-Cola (KO) partnering with bottling companies), or it might be a horizontal agreement, such as when airlines create code-sharing alliances.

The U.S. government encourages its contractors to form joint ventures, especially when they can help small businesses participate in government contracts. Chances are good that your employer or a company that you invest in is involved in at least one joint venture. (For a public company, a proxy statement and footnotes in its annual report will tell you for sure.)

A typical joint venture involves setting up a separate legal entity that both partners own. This both protects the assets of the joint venture partners and gives the venture managers greater autonomy. But there’s no one way to do a joint venture. They take many different legal forms depending on the nature of the business and the objectives of the participants.

In the U.S., a new joint business is usually a limited liability company (LLC). International joint ventures are often structured as equity joint ventures, with the parties contributing capital and assets to form a new entity. Ownership is then divided among the participants based on their respective contributions.

Companies don’t have to set up a new business organization, though. The partners can establish a new joint venture through a contractual agreement instead of setting up a new legal entity. The parties negotiate a contract that sets out the terms of cooperation. These ventures are usually limited to specific projects or collaborations. Otherwise, the contracts quickly become unwieldy.

The usual alternatives to joining ventures are mergers and acquisitions, which tend to carry more costs, complications, and risks. In a merger or acquisition, instead of setting up a new company with joint ownership, one partner takes over the other.

Joint ventures are less risky than mergers or acquisitions, but they can run into problems. As in any relationship, the parties may have different goals and interests that could lead to conflicts. Organizations may have different cultures, especially for joint ventures that cross international borders .

Joint ventures bring together two or more partners to share resources on a new line of business. They offer avenues for growth , risk mitigation , and access to new opportunities. Whether structured as a separate legal entity or created through contractual agreements, joint ventures require careful planning, effective communication, and well-structured agreements to succeed.

When executed thoughtfully, joint ventures can be a powerful tool for companies seeking to expand their reach, diversify their offerings, and navigate the challenges of today’s dynamic business landscape.

Specific companies are mentioned in this article for educational purposes only and not as an endorsement.

• Joint Ventures: An Overview | law.cornell.edu
• Joint Ventures | sba.gov
• Research: Joint Ventures that Keep Evolving Perform Better | hbr.org

Presentations made painless

• Get Premium

127 Joint Venture Essay Topic Ideas & Examples

Inside This Article

Are you struggling to come up with a compelling topic for your joint venture essay? Look no further! We have compiled a list of 127 joint venture essay topic ideas and examples to help you get started on your writing journey.

• The benefits and drawbacks of joint ventures in the business world
• Case study: Coca-Cola and Nestle's joint venture in the beverage industry
• Exploring cultural differences in international joint ventures
• The role of trust in successful joint ventures
• Joint ventures as a strategy for market expansion
• Analyzing the impact of joint ventures on competition
• Joint ventures in the technology sector: A look at Apple and IBM's partnership
• The legal aspects of forming a joint venture
• Joint ventures in the healthcare industry: A case study of Pfizer and GlaxoSmithKline
• How to negotiate a successful joint venture agreement
• The challenges of managing a joint venture
• Joint ventures in the automotive industry: A study of Renault-Nissan-Mitsubishi Alliance
• The role of communication in successful joint ventures
• Joint ventures in the food and beverage industry: A case study of Starbucks and PepsiCo
• The impact of joint ventures on innovation
• Joint ventures in the entertainment industry: A look at Disney and Pixar's partnership
• The importance of due diligence in forming a joint venture
• Joint ventures in the fashion industry: A study of Versace and H&M's collaboration
• The role of leadership in successful joint ventures
• Joint ventures in the energy sector: A case study of ExxonMobil and Rosneft's partnership
• The impact of joint ventures on corporate social responsibility
• Joint ventures in the hospitality industry: A study of Marriott and Starwood's merger
• The role of government regulations in shaping joint ventures
• Joint ventures in the pharmaceutical industry: A case study of AstraZeneca and Merck's partnership
• The impact of joint ventures on shareholder value
• Joint ventures in the retail sector: A look at Walmart and JD.com's partnership
• The role of risk management in joint ventures
• Joint ventures in the telecommunications industry: A case study of Vodafone and Verizon's partnership
• The impact of joint ventures on employee morale
• Joint ventures in the transportation sector: A study of Uber and Daimler's collaboration
• The role of innovation in successful joint ventures
• Joint ventures in the financial services industry: A case study of JPMorgan Chase and Morgan Stanley's partnership
• The impact of joint ventures on supply chain management
• Joint ventures in the construction sector: A look at Vinci and Bouygues's partnership
• The role of technology in shaping joint ventures
• Joint ventures in the real estate industry: A case study of CBRE and JLL's collaboration
• The impact of joint ventures on customer satisfaction
• Joint ventures in the aerospace industry: A study of Boeing and Airbus's partnership
• The role of sustainability in successful joint ventures
• Joint ventures in the mining sector: A case study of Rio Tinto and BHP Billiton's partnership
• The impact of joint ventures on brand equity
• Joint ventures in the insurance industry: A look at Allianz and AXA's partnership
• The role of corporate culture in shaping joint ventures
• Joint ventures in the manufacturing sector: A case study of Toyota and Subaru's collaboration
• The impact of joint ventures on strategic alliances
• Joint ventures in the technology sector: A study of Google and Samsung's partnership
• The role of ethics in successful joint ventures
• Joint ventures in the pharmaceutical industry: A case study of Novartis and Roche's partnership
• The impact of joint ventures on international trade
• Joint ventures in the automotive industry: A look at Ford and Mazda's collaboration
• The role of competitive advantage in shaping joint ventures
• Joint ventures in the healthcare industry: A case study of Johnson & Johnson and Novartis's partnership
• The impact of joint ventures on organizational culture
• Joint ventures in the food and beverage industry: A study of PepsiCo and Frito-Lay's partnership
• The role of strategic planning in successful joint ventures
• Joint ventures in the entertainment industry: A case study of Universal Music Group and Sony Music Entertainment's collaboration
• The impact of joint ventures on market share
• Joint ventures in the technology sector: A look at Microsoft and Nokia's partnership
• The role of corporate governance in shaping joint ventures
• Joint ventures in the automotive industry: A case study of General Motors and Honda's partnership
• The impact of joint ventures on financial performance
• Joint ventures in the hospitality industry: A study of Hilton and Accor's collaboration
• Joint ventures in the fashion industry: A case study of Gucci and Yves Saint Laurent's partnership
• The impact of joint ventures on customer loyalty
• Joint ventures in the energy sector: A look at Shell and Total's partnership
• The role of risk management in shaping joint ventures
• Joint ventures in the telecommunications industry: A case study of AT&T and T-Mobile's collaboration
• The impact of joint ventures on employee engagement
• Joint ventures in the transportation sector: A study of FedEx and UPS's partnership
• Joint ventures in the financial services industry: A case study of Goldman Sachs and Citigroup's partnership
• The impact of joint ventures on supply chain efficiency
• Joint ventures in the construction sector: A look at Lendlease and Skanska's collaboration
• Joint ventures in the real estate industry: A case study of CBRE and JLL's partnership
• The impact of joint ventures on customer experience
• Joint ventures in the aerospace industry: A study of Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman's collaboration
• Joint ventures in the mining sector: A case study of Anglo American and Glencore's partnership
• The impact of joint ventures on brand reputation
• Joint ventures in the insurance industry: A look at Prudential and MetLife's partnership
• Joint ventures in the manufacturing sector: A study of Siemens and GE's collaboration
• The impact of joint ventures on strategic partnerships
• Joint ventures in the technology sector: A case study of Intel and AMD's partnership
• The role of competitive advantage in successful joint ventures
• Joint ventures in the healthcare industry: A look at Roche and Novartis's collaboration
• The impact of joint ventures on organizational performance
• Joint ventures in the food and beverage industry: A study of Nestle and Unilever's partnership
• The role of strategic planning in shaping joint ventures
• Joint ventures in the entertainment industry: A case study of Warner Bros and Universal Pictures's collaboration
• The impact of joint ventures on market positioning
• Joint ventures in the technology sector: A look at Facebook and Instagram's partnership
• The role of corporate governance in successful joint ventures
• Joint ventures in the automotive industry: A case study of Volkswagen and Audi's partnership
• The impact of joint ventures on financial stability
• Joint ventures in the hospitality industry: A study of Hyatt and Hilton's collaboration
• The role of innovation in shaping joint ventures
• Joint ventures in the fashion industry: A case study of Chanel and Louis Vuitton's partnership
• The impact of joint ventures on customer retention
• Joint ventures in the energy sector: A look at BP and Chevron's partnership
• The role of risk management in successful joint ventures
• Joint ventures in the telecommunications industry: A case study of Verizon and AT&T's collaboration
• The impact of joint ventures on employee satisfaction
• Joint ventures in the transportation sector: A study of Delta and Southwest Airlines's partnership
• The role of sustainability in shaping joint ventures
• Joint ventures in the financial services industry: A case study of Bank of America and Wells Fargo's partnership
• The impact of joint ventures on supply chain effectiveness
• Joint ventures in the construction sector: A look at Bechtel and Fluor's collaboration
• The role of technology in successful joint ventures
• Joint ventures in the real estate industry: A case study of Cushman & Wakefield and Colliers International's partnership
• Joint ventures in the aerospace industry: A study of Boeing and Lockheed Martin's collaboration
• The role of ethics in shaping joint ventures
• Joint ventures in the mining sector: A case study of Barrick Gold and Newmont's partnership
• Joint ventures in the insurance industry: A look at AIG and MetLife's partnership
• The role of corporate culture in successful joint ventures
• Joint ventures in the manufacturing sector: A study of Toyota and Honda's collaboration
• Joint ventures in the technology sector: A case study of Apple and Samsung's partnership
• Joint ventures in the healthcare industry: A look at CVS Health and Walgreens's collaboration

Want to create a presentation now?

Instantly Create A Deck

Let PitchGrade do this for me

Hassle Free

We will create your text and designs for you. Sit back and relax while we do the work.

Explore More Content

• Privacy Policy
• Terms of Service

© 2023 Pitchgrade

• Search Search Please fill out this field.

What Is a Joint Venture (JV)?

• Understanding Joint Ventures

How to Set Up a Joint Venture

• Pros and Cons
• Paying Taxes
• Partnerships and Consortiums

The Bottom Line

• Types of Corporations

Joint Venture (JV): What Is It, and Why Do Companies Form One?

Yarilet Perez is an experienced multimedia journalist and fact-checker with a Master of Science in Journalism. She has worked in multiple cities covering breaking news, politics, education, and more. Her expertise is in personal finance and investing, and real estate.

A joint venture (JV) is a business arrangement in which two or more parties agree to pool their resources for the purpose of accomplishing a specific task. This task can be a new project or any other business activity.

Each of the participants in a joint venture is responsible for profits , losses, and costs associated with it. However, the venture is its own entity, separate from the participants’ other business interests.

Key Takeaways

• In a joint venture (JV), two or more businesses decide to combine their resources in order to fulfill an enumerated goal.
• They are a partnership in the colloquial sense of the word but can take on any legal structure.
• A common use of JVs is to partner up with a local business to enter a foreign market.

Sydney Burns / Investopedia

Understanding a Joint Venture (JV)

Although a joint venture is a partnership in the colloquial sense of the word, it can be formed using any legal structure—corporations, partnerships, limited liability companies (LLCs) , and other business entities can all be employed.

Despite the fact that the purpose of a JV is typically for production or research, one can also be formed for a continuing purpose. JVs can combine large and small companies to take on one or several projects and deals.

Here are the four main reasons why companies form JVs.

1. To Leverage Resources

A joint venture can take advantage of the combined resources of both companies to achieve the goal of the venture. One company might have a well-established manufacturing process, while the other company might have superior distribution channels.

2. To Reduce Costs

By using economies of scale , both companies in the joint venture can leverage their production at a lower per-unit cost than they would separately. This is particularly appropriate with technological advances that are costly to implement. Other cost savings as a result of a JV can include sharing advertising, business supply, or labor costs .

3. To Combine Expertise

Two companies or parties forming a joint venture might each have different backgrounds, skill sets, or expertise. When these are combined through a JV, each company can benefit from the other’s talent.

4. To Enter Foreign Markets

Another common use of joint ventures is to partner with a local business to enter a foreign market. A company that wants to expand its distribution network to new countries can enter into a JV agreement to supply products to a local business, thus benefiting from an already-existing distribution network.

Some countries have restrictions on foreigners entering their market, making a JV with a local entity almost the only way to do business in the country.

Image by Sabrina Jiang © Investopedia 2020

Regardless of the joint venture structure, the most important document will be the agreement that sets out all of the rights and obligations of each party to the venture.

The objectives, the initial contributions of the parties, the day-to-day operations, the right to the profits, and the responsibility for losses are all set out in the JV agreement. It is important to draft it with care to avoid risking litigation down the road.

Advantages and Disadvantages of a Joint Venture

A joint venture gives each party the opportunity to exploit a new business opportunity without bearing all of the cost and risk. Joint ventures, by nature, are riskier than “business as usual,” and coopetition and sharing the risk is a wise move.

If the right participants are involved, the joint venture also starts out with a broader base of knowledge and pool of talent than any one party possesses on its own.

For example, a joint entertainment venture set up by an animation studio and a streaming content provider can get off the ground quicker—and probably with a better chance of success—than either participant could alone.

Disadvantages

Embarking on a joint venture requires relinquishing a degree of control. The vital decisions are being made by two or more parties.

The companies involved must go into the project with the same goals and an equal degree of commitment.

Extreme differences between the participants’ company cultures and management styles can be a barrier to success. Will the executives of an animation studio be able to communicate in the same language as the executives of a digital streaming giant? They might, or they might line up in opposing camps.

Setting up a joint venture multiplies the number of management teams involved. If one party undergoes a significant change in its business structure or executive team, the joint venture can get lost in the shuffle.

Paying Taxes on a Joint Venture

When forming a joint venture, the most common thing the two parties can do is to set up a new entity. As the JV itself isn’t recognized by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), the business form between the two parties helps determine how taxes are paid.

As the JV is a separate entity, it will pay taxes as any other business or corporation does. However, if it chooses to operate as an LLC, its profits and losses would pass through to the owners’ personal tax returns, as with any other LLC.

The JV agreement will spell out how profits or losses are taxed. If the agreement is merely a contractual relationship between the two parties, then it will determine how the tax is divided between them.

Joint Ventures vs. Partnerships and Consortiums

A joint venture is not a partnership. That term is reserved for a single business entity that is formed by two or more people. JVs join two or more different entities into a new one, which may or may not be a partnership.

The term “ consortium ” is sometimes used to describe a JV, and there are similarities. However, a consortium is a more informal agreement than a JV. For example, a consortium of travel agencies can negotiate and give members special rates on hotels and airfares, but it does not create a whole new entity.

The agencies still pursue their own businesses independently. In a JV, they would share ownership of the created entity, jointly responsible for its risks, profits, losses, and governance.

Example of a Joint Venture

In 2022, two large Japanese companies, Sony and Honda, announced a joint venture to create an electric vehicle. Sony is one of the world's most prominent electronics companies and Honda is one of the most prominent automobile companies.

The established joint venture seeks to bring an electric vehicle to market by 2026 by combining Honda's skills in mobility development, technology, and sales, with that of Sony's expertise in imaging, telecommunication, networks, and entertainment.

The joint venture is called "Afeela." The company will be taking pre-orders in 2025 with expected delivery in the U.S. in 2026.

Why Would a Firm Enter Into a Joint Venture?

There are many reasons to join forces with another company on a temporary basis, including for purposes of expansion, development of new products, and entering new markets (particularly overseas).

Joint ventures are a common method of combining the business prowess, industry expertise, and personnel of two otherwise unrelated companies. This type of partnership allows each participating company an opportunity to scale its resources to complete a specific project or goal while reducing total cost and spreading out the risks and liabilities inherent to the task.

What Are the Primary Advantages of Forming a Joint Venture?

A joint venture affords each party access to the resources of the other participant(s) without having to spend excessive amounts of capital. Each company is able to maintain its own identity and can easily return to normal business operations once the JV is complete. JVs also provide the benefit of shared risk.

What Are Some Disadvantages of Forming a Joint Venture?

Joint venture contracts commonly limit the outside activities of participant companies while the project is in progress. Each company involved in a JV may be required to sign exclusivity agreements or a  non-compete agreement  that affects current relationships with  vendors  or other business contacts.

The contract under which a JV is created may also expose each company to liability inherent to a partnership unless a separate business entity is established for the JV. Furthermore, while companies participating in a JV share control, work activities and use of resources are not always divided equally.

Does a Joint Venture Need an Exit Strategy?

A joint venture is intended to meet a particular project with specific goals, so it ends when the project is complete. An exit strategy is important, as it provides a clear path on how to dissolve the joint business, avoiding drawn-out discussions, costly legal battles, unfair practices, negative impacts on customers, and controlling for any possible financial loss.

In most JVs, an exit strategy can come in three different forms: sale of the new business, a spinoff of operations, or employee ownership. Each exit strategy offers different advantages to partners in the JV, as well as the potential for conflict.

A joint venture between companies can open the way for expansion into a new line of business by each participant at a relatively modest cost. In fact, it sounds ideal: Each company contributes its own expertise, but the cost of the venture is split among them.

It’s only ideal, though, if the companies have a shared vision and an equal commitment to the success of the joint venture.

Internal Revenue Service. “ Tax Information for Partnerships .”

AP. " Japan's Honda, Sony Joining Forces on New Electric Vehicle ."

Car & Driver. " Afeela Is a New EV From Sony and Honda Coming to the U.S. in 2026 ."

Afeela. " Home ."

• Terms of Service
• Editorial Policy
• Privacy Policy

Download report: →

Ritza Suazo

Joint-ventures explained: definition, types and real-world examples.

Discover how joint-ventures can help you fuel growth, the different types and inspiring real-world examples of some of the most successful joint-ventures of all time.

In today's fast-moving landscape, joint-ventures have emerged as a powerful strategy for companies seeking to grow beyond their core business, expand their portfolios, and explore untapped markets. They deliver growth fast, at reduced risk and enable participants to form valuable strategic alliances. 

By merging diverse strengths, sharing unique resources, and tapping into collective expertise, joint-ventures provide a unique platform for businesses to grow, innovate, and conquer new frontiers. In addition, joint venture partners can achieve greater economies of scale, leading to: 

• Reduced production costs
• Increased purchasing power

Well-established companies can also leverage their market presence to enhance the credibility and trust in the new venture, creating buzz among customers and making it easier to attract customers, investors, and other stakeholders.

To give you a better idea of how joint-ventures can help you boost growth, let’s take a look at how they work, the different types, and some inspiring real-world examples.  

Find out how to build an innovation-led corporate ecosystem.

What is a joint-venture.

A joint venture is a strategic arrangement between two or more companies where they pool resources and expertise to achieve a common goal. Each company brings a specific set of resources to the table, including the capital, technology, personnel, or intellectual property, in exchange for a share of the revenues, expenses, and control of the joint venture.

Each participating company holds a stake in any profits, losses or costs associated with the joint venture. However, in most cases, the venture itself is its own entity, separate from each of its parent company’s broader business interests.

Key aspects of project-based joint-ventures include:

• Access to new markets: Joining forces with companies in a determined target market can provide quick access to new customers and distribution channels.
• Shared risks and costs: Joint-ventures allow companies to share the financial burden and risks associated with the new venture.
• Combining strengths: Partnering companies can leverage each other's expertise, technology, or resources to create a more competitive offering in the market.
• Learning from partners: Joint-ventures provide an opportunity for companies to learn from each other, acquiring new skills, knowledge, and best practices.
• Increased bargaining power: By joining forces, companies can often negotiate better terms with suppliers, customers, or regulatory authorities.

Joint-ventures vs partnerships: what's the difference?

Both joint-ventures and partnerships involve working together towards a common goal. In fact, you might say joint-ventures are a “type” of partnership, which is why they share several similarities (e.g. pooling resources, working toward a common goal, etc.). 

To help you understand some of the key differences, we compiled them below:

Definition:

Joint Venture: A structured collaboration that establishes a new entity to pool risks, resources, and share profits.

Partnership: A commercial arrangement with reciprocal agreements like a preferred supplier-client relationship.

Joint Venture: Specific task or project.

Partnership: Long-term business operation

Joint Venture: Temporary, limited to the project's completion

Partnership: Indefinite, ongoing

Joint Venture: Limited to the scope of the venture

Partnership: Unlimited, partners jointly liable

Joint Venture: Shared among participants

Partnership: Partners share risks based on their agreement

Joint Venture: Distributed according to established agreements

Partnership: Divided among partners as per their agreement

Decision-making:

Joint Venture: Based on the joint venture agreement

Partnership: Collaborative, typically per partner's contribution

Joint Venture: Funded by participants for a specific project or new entity

Partnership: Partners contribute as needed based on pre-established agreements

What types of joint-ventures are there?

Joint venture ventures come in all shapes and sizes, with participants ranging from individuals to small and large businesses to even governments. To give you a better idea of how joint-ventures work, we’ve listed the four main types below:

Project-Based Joint-Ventures

Project-based joint-ventures are formed to collaborate on a specific project, usually with a specific goal and timeline. The participants pool their resources, expertise, and capabilities to achieve the project's goals more effectively than they could individually. 

Once the project is completed or the desired outcome is achieved, the joint venture may be dissolved, and the partnering companies may go back to operating independently or collaborate on other projects in the future.

The key aspects of product-based joint-ventures include:

• A specific goal: These ventures centre on a specific project with a defined goal. 
• Duration: Generally time-bound, concluding when the specific project is completed or the goal is achieved.
• Structure: Tend to involve a new legal entity, a contractual agreement, or an informal collaboration between the partnering companies.

Example: BP and Reliance Industries

‍ In 2011, BP and Reliance Industries announced a project-based joint venture aimed at investing $20 billion in developing offshore oil and gas reserves in India. The goal was to accelerate the building of infrastructure to receive, transport and market natural gas in India.

This joint venture combined BP's technical and operational capabilities with Reliance's expertise in the Indian market to develop oil and gas reserves in specific locations. Established with a clear aim and future end date, this is a good example of a project-based joint venture. 

Function-Based Joint-Venture 

In a function-based joint venture, companies collaborate to perform a particular business function or activity, like marketing, sales, or distribution. This type of joint venture allows companies to leverage each other's expertise, resources, and networks in specific business areas, resulting in increased efficiency and market reach.

Key aspects of function-based joint-ventures include:

• Scope: Function-based joint-ventures focus on specific business functions.
• Duration: Tend to be ongoing, as they often involve continuous business functions, while other types are typically time-bound, concluding when the specific project is completed.
• Flexibility: Companies can choose to form a separate legal entity or operate under a less formal agreement, depending on their needs and objectives

Example : Starbucks and PepsiCo

Since 1994, Starbucks and PepsiCo have been working together to produce and distribute ready-to-drink coffee beverages. This joint venture, known as the North American Coffee Partnership (NACP) , has led to the creation of popular products like Starbucks Frappuccino and Starbucks Doubleshot Espresso. The result? Increased market reach, brand awareness and profits for both companies. 

Vertical Joint-Venture

A vertical joint venture is a strategic collaboration between companies at different stages of the supply chain (e.g. manufacturers, distributors, or retailers). The main goal of this type of partnership is to optimise the supply chain by combining the unique capabilities and resources of each company, leading to increased efficiency, cost savings, and better control over production and distribution processes.

Key aspects of vertical joint-ventures include:

• Scope: They tend to focus on the synergies between companies at different stages of the supply chain.
• Objectives: Primarily seek to enhance efficiency, reduce costs, and streamline operations within the value chain.
• Enhanced coordination: Enable companies to identify potential bottlenecks, improve information flows, and streamline operations.
• Quality assurance: Enable companies to maintain better quality control, ensuring that products meet specifications, regulatory standards, and customer expectations.
• Timely delivery: By working closely with supply chain partners, companies can better manage lead times, optimise inventory levels, and ensure timely deliveries. 

Example: Shell and Cosan

In 2010, Royal Dutch Shell and Cosan (a Brazilian producer of bioethanol, sugar and energy) created Raízen a joint venture focused on sustainable and competitive biofuels. The collaboration, combined Shell's expertise in fuel distribution with Cosan's experience in sugar and ethanol production. Since then, Raízen has become one of the largest bioenergy producers in Brazil, benefiting both companies by expanding their market reach and boosting profits.

Horizontal Joint-Venture

Horizontal joint-ventures are strategic collaborations between companies that operate within the same industry or market, often as competitors. These partnerships focus on combining resources, technology, or expertise to achieve a shared objective, e.g. expanding into new markets or creating innovative products. This type of venture can provide participating companies with a competitive edge by leveraging their collective strengths and helping them mitigate risk.

Key aspects of horizontal joint-ventures include:

• Objectives: Horizontal joint-ventures primarily seek to expand market share, pool resources, and achieve economies of scale by working together to enhance competitiveness. 
• Competitive Advantage: Provides a competitive edge by combining resources, expertise, and market presence, enabling companies to better compete against industry rivals. 
• Risk Management: By partnering with companies operating within the same industry, horizontal joint-ventures can help manage risks associated with market fluctuations, increased competition, or other industry-specific challenges.

Example: Hulu

Hulu was created as a joint venture between several media companies, including NBC Universal, News Corporation, The Walt Disney Company, and Providence Equity Partners. By pooling their extensive media libraries and resources, the participating companies were able to create a competitive streaming service that effectively addressed the growing demand for online video content. Over time, Hulu has expanded its offerings to include live TV and original programming, further enhancing its position in the streaming market.

The venture enabled the partner companies to adapt to the changing media landscape, monetise their content libraries, cross-promote their brands, share costs and risks, and develop original content, ultimately enhancing their positions in the market and creating new opportunities for growth.

Final thoughts

As illustrated in the examples above, joint-ventures can be a powerful tool for companies to accelerate growth and achieve strategic goals. With the right partner and effective execution, joint-ventures can help you unlock new opportunities and lead to mutual success.

Hungry for more inspiring examples? Be sure to check out our other joint venture article: 10 joint-venture examples you should know about.

Joint-ventures help you reduce risk, pool valuable resources, boost brand recognition and increase your overall chances of long-term success. We can help you find the right partner and strategy to bring your next joint venture concept to life. 

How to build an innovation-led corporate ecosystem

Grow your corporation from an egosystem to an ecosystem.

Get access to the only corporate venture database in the world

Looking for insights and inspiration for your next venture track? See who's changing the game and explore this ever-expanding database.

Keep reading.

Walmart's Store N°8: Building ventures that are shaping the future of retail

How Store N°8 is helping Walmart fuel innovation from within through its accelerated incubation model.

MasterCard is staying on top of the mobile payment game with Qkr by Masterpass

With the launch of its own incubator—MasterCard Labs—in 2010, the company has generated several successful in-house startups including Simplify Commerce, Shop This! and QkR.

10 failed corporate ventures and why they were worth it.

Failing after putting in all that time and resources is extremely difficult, but all is not lost. The learnings these corporations gained are worth it.

17 Advantages and Disadvantages of Joint Ventures

A joint venture is a business arrangement where two or more parties agree to pool their resources together for the purpose of accomplishing a specific task. This work could be a new project, research and development investments, or any other business activity that is jointly relevant to everyone or each organization involved in the agreement.

Each of the participants in a joint venture is responsible for the profits, losses, and costs associated with mutual activities. This business effort is also an entity by itself, separate from the other business interests of its founders.

Although a joint venture is a partnership in every sense of the word, this business effort can choose to take on any legal structure. Limited liability companies, corporations, and partnerships can all work together to form this agreed-upon structure. It could even combine companies of various sizes to take on one significant project or several smaller ones.

Several joint venture advantages and disadvantages are worth considering when looking at the future of this business structure.

List of the Advantages of Joint Ventures

1. Joint ventures are not permanent arrangements to manage. Joint ventures are not typically a permanent solution. It is a temporary arrangement that allows two or more companies or individuals to help each other in specific situations. That means you are not taking long-term risks when creating this arrangement. If something goes wrong unexpectedly, then most agreements allow for an exit plan that can limit the financial obligations of each party.

2. Companies receive access to better resources. When agencies come together to form a joint venture, then it gives everyone involved access to better resources. Each company can take advantage of the specialized technologies and staff that are available in each organization. Instead of needing to hire or develop these opportunities internally, all of the necessary capital and equipment becomes part of this overall agreement.

This makes it a lot easier to enter foreign markets because an organization can partner with an existing company instead of trying to create new operations. It is an easy way to expand distribution networks or obtain access to intellectual property without a significant investment.

3. New resources provide a way to gain new expertise or insights. When agencies come together to start a joint venture, then it gives each one an opportunity to gain new insights and expertise into specific areas of their industry. That makes this arrangement ideal when one company has access to a market, and another has more resources in research and development. That makes the targeted demographics easier to understand, while there are no long-term obligations that could become financial anchors in the future.

Even if the joint venture ends in failure, it’s existence as a separate entity doesn’t impact the structures, revenues, or liabilities of the home organizations. The cost of the effort ends up being the primary risk factor involved in the solution.

4. No one takes on all of the risks independently with a joint venture. When organizations come together to form a joint venture, then it gives them a way to spread out the risk factors that are involved in their planned activities. This advantage also makes it possible for the overall cost of the work to be less individually since there are multiple parties actively engaged in the agreement. Although that means any profits or credit get shared equally, this conservative approach makes it a lot easier to experiment with new ideas because no one must take independent risks to generate possible solutions.

5. It is a flexible arrangement that can go through modification if necessary. The agreement that forms a joint venture can provide flexibility in the arrangement for all of the parties involved. Not only can it be a limited lifespan that covers a fraction of what each organization provides to the partnership, but it can also have terms that can change when specific goals or outcomes get reached.

That means a joint venture can always take a balanced approach so that everyone can benefit from the arrangement. It doesn’t require one company to find success through the failure of another.

6. You can always find ways to exit out of a joint venture. Even if you don’t have a formal exit plan written into a joint venture agreement, the timeline of this arrangement makes it possible to leave if it becomes necessary. The processes of divestiture and consolidation give a company several creative ways to escape their non-core organizational mission and vision without taking on too much risk as a result. The brand message can stay the same, including when unforeseen circumstances might cause the partnership to split.

7. Every asset in a joint venture gets inventoried at the start of the process. You won’t need to worry about losing intellectual property or other commercial assets when you enter into a joint venture agreement. Every asset of each party gets inventoried as part of the initial stages of this arrangement. That means you will always know the assets that are yours, at the beginning of the process, even when the rewards you earned exceed your expectations.

This advantage is especially important for the agencies that form a limited liability company with their joint venture. Because pass-through income is part of that structure, the taxation issues can become quite complex unless complete ownership stakes, responsibility, and inventory are entirely outlined.

8. Companies can sell their shares of a joint venture. There are a couple of ways in which this advantage of a joint venture becomes possible. The most common method of taking money out of this arrangement is to sell one’s stake in it. If the other partner agrees that there is value in owning another portion of a new company or all of it, then a fair offer will usually get an organization out when they no longer want to participate.

The other way to sell shares is to take a joint venture and turn it into a public company. Holding an IPO will allow for the issuance of preferred and common stock that can translate into additional values when a successful outcome is achievable.

List of the Disadvantages of Joint Ventures

1. A joint venture isn’t recognized by the IRS. The contract arrangement that creates a joint venture isn’t a separate entity that the IRS recognizes. When the decision gets made to form one, the most common thing to do is to set up a new entity, and then each party to the arrangement helps to determine how taxes will get paid in the future. Unless the new joint venture is a separate entity and pays taxes independently, each party is responsible for whatever amount gets put into the agreement.

That’s why it is imperative for the arrangement to spell out how profits or losses get taxed. If the agreement is only a contractual relationship between everyone, then it is up to the documentation to determine the outcome of this potential disadvantage.

2. Joint ventures can create a clash of cultures. Different companies have their own unique managerial styles that they implement. When these two cultures are at odds with each other, then it can result in poor integration of the joint venture arrangement. A lack of cooperation due to this disadvantage can cause an agreement to unravel before any benefits become achievable. Even if there are proactive efforts to manage this problem, leadership groups that have different preferences, tastes, or beliefs can find that these issues can get in the way if they are left unchecked.

3. It can result in an imbalance of assets for one or more parties. Because a joint venture involves multiple companies working together on a single project, it can cause an imbalance to occur if one agency has more expertise, investment, or assets then the other parties involved. It has an adverse impact on the relationship because the returns are not equal to the work put into the effort in the first place. That’s why the value of intangible assets, like the geographic location of an agency, must get documented in the initial paperwork that forms this new entity.

4. Joint ventures usually limit other outside activities. When agencies come together to form a joint venture, then one of the stipulations that govern the arrangement involves future outside activities. It is quite common for these contracts to restrict any other outside efforts from the participant companies while this agreement remains active. That means a new business opportunity that comes up while working in a joint venture would need to be set aside or ignored, and that could be a costly decision to make.

Every company will want to make sure they fully understand what it is they are getting into before agreeing to a joint venture. It could be a decision that has a negative impact on the entire business.

5. Someone always feels like they’re providing an unequal amount of effort. A joint venture provides unique resources from different perspectives to create something new. There are times when someone will always feel like they are providing an unequal amount of effort compared to the other parties in their arrangement. If the duties of each group are not entirely outlined correctly, then it can be possible for one agency to take advantage of everyone else by sitting on the sidelines. The pressure is always on the firms that have active responsibilities in the present time, without regard to what may be necessary in the future.

6. Companies can restrict or eliminate the flexibility found in joint ventures. A joint venture can be a flexible option for agencies to consider, but there are also times when this benefit gets restricted. If that outcome occurs, then the participants in the agreement must focus on the work they hope to accomplish so that the contract becomes a profitable experience. If one party decides to give up without selling their stake in the work, then it can become a massive loss for everyone involved.

The three most common reasons why a joint venture fails our cultural differences, poor integration processes, and unclear leadership. Up to 70% of these efforts eventually fail, and the only way to avoid the problem is to do sufficient planning before the work even begins.

7. Leadership gaps can form in some joint ventures. When two or more organizations come together to form a joint venture, then there must be some level of equality on their leadership teams. If one set of executives holds all of the experience that is needed for the new entity, then the imbalance that occurs can result in a lack of enforcement. Gaps form when no one is willing to take responsibility for expanded roles or move to a new position, even though more job opportunities become available through this process.

That means until the hiring managers can find some of the human capital needed to plug in the missing pieces, it may be a slow start for the joint venture.

8. There must be an emphasis on research and development. Joint ventures are successful when each party does its required part in the agreement. If everyone decides that they will not be responsible for funding or implementing new research and development processes, then the new entity will likely get sold to one of the other partners. This disadvantage can also occur when one party tires of trying to integrate processes without results, deciding to abandon or sell their investments to recoup whatever losses might occur.

Although some businesses from joint ventures have gone on to do amazing things, the sale or abandonment of one partner usually results in the closure of an opportunity.

9. The expectations set for the joint venture could be unreasonable. When companies come together to create something new, then the expectations for a positive result can be quite high. It is essential to take a realistic approach with a joint venture, understanding that immediate gratification from an investment is rather rare. Managing expectations is an ongoing issue, especially if you find yourself working in an unfamiliar industry.

If expectations are set too high for this effort, one party might decide to disengage from the process entirely to focus on the operations of the home business. Agreeing on a strategy to create future results will help to remove the natural barriers to communication and cooperation that exist.

Sony Ericsson is one of the most famous examples of a successful joint venture between two large companies. They came together in the early 2000s with the idea that together they could become a global leader in a growing cellular market. After several years of operating this entity together, the entire venture would eventually become solely owned by Sony.

Microsoft sold its stake in Caradigm in 2016, which was a joint venture create it with General Electric Company. The goal of the work was to integrate the software giant’s Amalga enterprise healthcare data and intelligence system into the technologies manufactured by GE.

When we examine the advantages and disadvantages of joint ventures, it is essential to remember that it is not a partnership or a consortium. These terms are reserved for single business entities that two or more people form. It can be a beneficial arrangement in a lot of ways, but there are always risks that must get managed throughout the process to ensure a positive result.

Essay on Joint Venture | Business Management

Here is a compilation of essays on ‘Joint Venture’ for class 9, 10, 11 and 12. Find paragraphs, long and short essays on ‘Joint Venture’ especially written for school and college students. 

Essay on Joint Venture

Essay Contents:

• Essay on Joint Venture and Competition

Essay # 1. Meaning of Joint Venture:

ADVERTISEMENTS:

Joint venture is a kind of business venture usually on the basis of an agreement, where two firms or companies pool their resources to form a business associa­tion but one firm or company does not acquire the other, and they do not form actual merger. In a joint venture, two firms together produce, warehouse, transport, and market products.

The profits and losses from these operations are shared in some predetermined proportion. A collaboration agreement with specific terms and conditions with respect to areas of operation and others is important in case of joint venture to avoid any future complications.

Joint venture is a management proposition and creates a synergistic condition— the addition of two parts is greater than the whole. It does not require basic structural changes in business and management but provides strategic posture to obtain synergistic effects in many areas like sales, operations, investment, and management. 

Essay # 2. Forms of Joint Venture:

The term ‘joint venture’ in the context of international business situations refers to certain special forms illustrated below. Such joint venture may be an association between the multinational corporation (MNC) and private local firms, local government agencies, or other foreign companies.

(i) Management Contract:

A MNC may allocate capital across international borders and/or may sell managerial capability.

(ii) Co-Production and Technology Supply:

The partners in the western and eastern globe may collaborate in the production of components or bulk products for a final assembly or final packaging by one of the partners. One partner supplies the technology but the marketing of products is done in each partner’s respective market.

(iii) Subcontracting:

A partner of a socialist country may manufacture the product as per capitalist country’s partner’s specifications and deliver the same to the latter. To cite another cause, a leading MNC may offer a subcontract to an Indian firm to produce a product to be sold to another country’s market.

(iv) Turnkey Operation:

A partner of one country may sell plant and equipment, and technology to its partner in another Country and is paid in terms of products of the newly created plant.

Essay # 3. Advantages of Joint Venture:

Joint venture offers the following advantages:

(i) A major means to raise local finance, and to reduce risks from devaluation and price inflation.

(ii) Spreading of investments by the MNC over a number of countries.

(iii) Identifying sources of key materials or providing marketing assistance.

(iv) Provision of other facilities like local currency loans/tax incentives, etc.

(v) Avoidance of political risks like risk of nationalisation or expropriation in case of international base of joint ventures.

Essay # 4. Disadvantages of Joint Venture:

Joint venture has certain disadvantages also. These are:

(i) Loss of control;

(ii) Lower profitability;

(iii) Compulsion to share new or different ideas;

(iv) Compulsion to accept out-dated technology at times;

(v) Compulsion to accept sophisticated technology with a backward partner; and

(vi) Management conflicts

Essay # 5. Strategies of Joint Venture:

Three types of strategies can be identified in a joint venture.

1. ‘Spider-Web’ Strategy:

This kind of strategy is usually adopted by a small firm which does not have sufficient capital to bid on its own on different technical projects even if the rate of success is bright.

Such firm, in order to avoid the chance of being taken over by other larger firms, enters into joint venture agreements with a number of firms for joint bidding for mining or drilling rights. This way, it can retain its own identity and ensure survival and growth in the face of competition.

2. ‘Go-Together-Split’ Strategy:

For a strategy of this nature, a firm enters into joint venture agreement with another firm for an identified product or service line, or engineering project(s) for a definite period of time. With the completion of projects, the venturing firms split. This way a firm can retain its own independence, yet facing a challenging task.

3. ‘Successive Integration’ Strategy:

In this type of strategy, a firm initially devotes to have some joint ventures with another firm in relation to certain projects and then decides about the feasibility of a merger scheme.

This way, a firm is in a position to understand another firm’s business philosophy and policy before an actual merger takes place. Thus, any management pursuing this strategy can test the business risks beforehand.

Essay # 6. Joint Venture and Competition:

Joint ventures can meet the challenges of business competitions in the following ways:

1. An individual firm has strengths and weaknesses in certain areas of its operation. Through joint ventures with other firms, it can balance its SWOT position.

2. A joint venture allows a firm to understand and undertake R&D effort, product quality improvement and so on—which are essential to face competition.

3. Acquiring new process system or novel technology and improving efficiency and productivity, etc. are vital in a competitive business situation—a joint venture provides them.

4. Diversification and globalisation processes, in this present day competitive world, are possibly direct contributions of joint ventures.

Related Articles:

• Difference between Partnership and Joint Hindu Family Business
• Joint Venture
• Joint Hindu Family Business: Meaning, Characteristics and Advantages
• Different Kinds of Partner | Business Management

We use cookies

Privacy overview.

Joint Venture

Ai generator.

A joint venture is a strategic alliance where two or more parties collaborate to achieve specific business objectives, sharing resources, risks, and rewards. This partnership combines expertise and assets to pursue common goals for a better life , driving innovation, efficiency, and market expansion. Joint ventures are often formed to enter new markets, develop new products, or enhance operational capabilities, leveraging each partner’s strengths to create value and achieve mutual success in a competitive landscape.

What Is a Joint Venture?

A joint venture (JV) is a business arrangement where two or more parties collaborate, pooling their resources and expertise, to achieve specific goals while sharing risks, profits, and losses, typically forming a new, jointly-owned entity.

Examples of Joint Venture

• Technology Transfer : A U.S. tech company and a Japanese electronics manufacturer jointly develop advanced semiconductor chips, sharing technology and expertise.
• Automotive Industry Collaboration : Two automotive companies from different countries develop a new hybrid vehicle, combining their engineering, technology, and financial resources.
• Real Estate Development : A local real estate company and an international investor collaborate to develop a mixed-use property, leveraging local knowledge and global capital.
• Entertainment and Media : An American media company and a Chinese entertainment firm form a joint venture to produce and distribute content for both Chinese and international markets.
• Energy Sector Partnership : A Middle Eastern oil company and a European renewable energy firm partner to develop a large-scale solar power project, innovating in sustainable energy.
• Pharmaceuticals R&D : German and Canadian pharmaceutical companies join forces to research and develop a new drug, sharing technology and risk.
• Retail Expansion : A North American retailer and a South American company enter a joint venture to tackle the South American market, adapting to local regulations and preferences.
• Agriculture and Food Production : An Australian agricultural firm and a U.S. food processor collaborate to produce and market organic foods, combining agricultural expertise with supply chain capabilities.
• Financial Services Integration : Two banking institutions from Europe and Asia establish a joint venture to provide cross-border financial services, enhancing global financial integration and customer service.
• Technology Infrastructure : An American internet company and an Indian tech firm form a joint venture to build and manage data centers in India, aiming to improve cloud services across the region.
• Healthcare Services : A U.S. hospital group and a Brazilian healthcare provider establish a joint venture to develop healthcare facilities in Brazil, sharing medical knowledge and administrative practices.
• Educational Technology : A British educational tech company and a Chinese e-learning firm create a joint venture to develop and market digital learning platforms for students in China.
• Airline Operations : European and Canadian airlines form a strategic alliance to optimize transatlactic flight routes and share frequent flyer benefits, enhancing operational efficiencies.
• Fashion and Lifestyle : A French luxury brand and a South Korean fashion company team up to design and market a luxury accessory line, merging French design with Korean manufacturing prowess.
• Sports Marketing : An American sports management firm and a Middle Eastern media company create a joint venture to promote and manage sporting events in the Middle East.
• Biotechnology Research : A Swiss biotech company and a U.S. pharmaceutical giant form a joint venture to develop gene therapies, combining advanced R&D capabilities and resources for groundbreaking treatments.

Types Of Joint Ventures

• Equity Joint Venture : Partners create a new entity and invest capital, sharing ownership, profits, and losses proportionally to their equity stakes.
• Contractual Joint Venture : Partners collaborate based on a contractual agreement without forming a new entity, sharing resources, responsibilities, and profits as outlined in the contract.
• Horizontal Joint Venture : Partners from the same industry collaborate to expand their market reach, combine strengths, or share technology.
• Vertical Joint Venture : Partners from different stages of the same industry supply chain collaborate to enhance efficiency, reduce costs, or improve supply chain integration.
• Project-based Joint Venture : Partners form a joint venture specifically for a single project, dissolving the partnership once the project is completed.
• International Joint Venture : Partners from different countries collaborate to enter new markets, navigate local regulations, and leverage each other’s market knowledge and resources.

Joint Venture Agreements

• Purpose and Objectives : Clearly outline the purpose of the joint venture, including specific goals and objectives that partners aim to achieve through comprehensive data analysis .
• Contributions : Detail the resources, capital, technology, and expertise each partner will contribute to the joint venture.
• Ownership Structure : Specify the ownership percentages of each partner and how profits and losses will be distributed.
• Management and Control : Outline the management structure, decision-making processes, and how control will be exercised within the joint venture.
• Duration : Define the duration of the joint venture, including start and end dates, and conditions for extension or termination.
• Roles and Responsibilities : Clarify the roles and responsibilities of each partner, including operational duties and performance expectations.
• Funding and Financing : Detail the financial arrangements, including initial funding, ongoing financing, and how additional capital will be raised if needed.
• Profit Sharing : Specify how profits will be distributed among the partners, including any reinvestment strategies.
• Dispute Resolution : Establish mechanisms for resolving disputes between partners, such as mediation, arbitration, or legal action.
• Exit Strategy : Define the conditions under which partners can exit the joint venture, including buyout provisions, transfer of interests, and dissolution procedures.
• Confidentiality and Non-Compete : Include clauses to protect confidential information and restrict partners from engaging in competitive activities during and after the joint venture.
• Legal Compliance : Ensure the joint venture complies with relevant laws and regulations, and specify the governing law for the agreement.
• Amendments : Outline the process for making amendments to the joint venture agreement, requiring mutual consent from all partners.

Why to Form a Joint Venture?

• Access to New Markets : Forming a joint venture allows partners to break into new geographic or product markets by capitalizing on each other’s established presence and local insights, enhancing their advertising reach and effectiveness.
• Shared Resources : Partners can pool their resources, including capital, technology, and expertise, to achieve goals that might be difficult or impossible to achieve independently.
• Risk Sharing : Sharing the risks associated with large projects or market entry helps reduce the financial burden on individual partners, making it more manageable.
• Innovation and Synergy : Combining the strengths and capabilities of each partner can lead to innovative solutions and synergies, enhancing the overall competitiveness of the joint venture.
• Cost Efficiency : Joint ventures can achieve economies of scale, reduce costs, and increase efficiency through shared production facilities, distribution channels, and administrative functions.
• Regulatory Benefits : In some cases, forming a joint venture with a local partner can help navigate regulatory requirements and gain faster approval from government authorities.
• Access to Technology and Innovation : Collaborating with partners who have advanced technology or innovative processes can accelerate development and improve product offerings.
• Enhanced Distribution Networks : Partners can leverage each other’s distribution networks to reach a broader customer base and improve market coverage.
• Financial Support : Combining financial resources from multiple partners can provide the necessary funding for large-scale projects and expansions.
• Focus on Core Competencies : By forming a joint venture, partners can focus on their core competencies while the joint venture handles complementary activities, leading to better overall performance.

When Should a Joint Venture Dissolve

A joint venture should dissolve when its primary objectives have been achieved or are no longer feasible, making the partnership unnecessary. Additionally, dissolution may be appropriate if the venture is consistently unprofitable, resulting in financial strain for the partners. Diverging goals or strategic priorities between partners can also necessitate dissolution, as misalignment can hinder decision-making and operational efficiency. Legal or regulatory changes that impact the viability of the joint venture, as well as persistent conflicts or unresolved disputes between partners, may also warrant dissolution. Ultimately, a joint venture should dissolve when continuing the partnership no longer serves the best interests of the involved parties.

Top 10 Advantages of Joint Ventures

• Access to New Markets and Distribution Networks Joint ventures enable companies to penetrate new markets and tap into distribution networks that were previously inaccessible. By collaborating with a local company and utilizing their established connections and expertise, businesses can facilitate payment processes, accelerate market penetration, and expand their market share.
• Shared Resources and Expertise In a joint venture, each party brings its own resources and expertise, such as technology, manufacturing capabilities, or specialized staff. This shared pool of resources enables the venture to pursue opportunities that the individual partners might not be able to tackle alone due to resource constraints.
• Cost and Risk Sharing The financial load of significant projects can be substantial, but joint ventures enable the participating parties to distribute the costs and risks. This distribution is often reflected in the billing statement , making it feasible to engage in large-scale or high-risk ventures while preserving financial stability.
• Access to New Technologies and Intellectual Property Partnering in a joint place often grants access to new technologies and intellectual property. This can be particularly valuable in industries where technological advancement is rapid, and staying competitive requires continuous innovation.
• Increased Capacity Joint ventures can enhance business capacity through the amalgamation of efforts and resources, as shown in the qualitative details of the billing statement. This collaboration allows partners to manage larger projects or boost production volumes without substantial individual investments in new facilities or equipment.
• Enhanced Competitive Position By combining strengths, joint ventures can enhance their competitive position in the market. This could involve outmatching competitors on price, quality, or service delivery, thereby gaining a competitive edge.
• Flexibility Joint ventures offer flexibility in terms of scope and duration. Unlike mergers or long-term partnerships, they can be structured for a specific project or a limited time, which can be particularly advantageous for projects with a clear end point.
• Opportunity to Learn New Skills Working closely with another partner allows the exchange of knowledge and skills among the staff from both companies. This learning opportunity can improve employee skill sets and boost overall organizational competence.
• Easier Exit Strategy Typically, it’s easier to terminate or exit a joint venture compared to other types of business agreements like mergers or long-term partnerships. This can be advantageous if objectives are met or if the partnership no longer serves its purpose.
• Potential for Future Partnerships Successful joint ventures can lay the groundwork for future collaborations. Once trust is built and synergy proven, partners might be more inclined to explore other cooperative ventures or deepen their alliance with additional projects.

Difference between Joint Ventures and Partnerships:

How does a joint venture differ from a merger?

A joint venture is a temporary collaboration for a specific goal, while a merger is a permanent unification of two businesses.

What are the advantages of a joint venture?

Joint ventures provide access to new markets, shared resources, and the spreading of risks.

Can a joint venture be formed between more than two parties?

Yes, joint ventures can involve multiple partners pooling resources together.

What are the risks associated with joint ventures?

Risks include potential conflicts between partners, uneven resource distribution, and the possibility of not achieving goals.

How is profit shared in a joint venture?

Profit sharing is determined by the agreement, typically based on each party’s contribution.

What happens if a joint venture fails?

Partners absorb losses as specified in the joint venture agreement, and the venture is usually dissolved.

Can international companies form a joint venture?

Yes, joint ventures are common between international companies to enter new markets.

Is a joint venture a separate legal entity?

It can be, depending on how the joint venture is structured; it might also be a non-entity partnership.

What is the typical duration of a joint venture?

The duration is usually tied to the completion of a specific project or goal.

How do partners resolve disputes in a joint venture?

Dispute resolution methods are typically outlined in the joint venture agreement, often involving arbitration or mediation.

Text prompt

• Instructive
• Professional

10 Examples of Public speaking

20 Examples of Gas lighting

Joint Venture Example

Overview of Joint Venture Examples

Joint Venture is a collaboration of two or more parties for a common business purpose. These parties, also known as co-ventures, can be enterprises, organizations, or even individuals. In a joint venture, the involved parties agree to share the profits and incur the losses in accordance with their ownership ratio.

Joint ventures can serve various purposes, such as exploring a new market or a region, actualizing high-budget projects, innovating new products, etc. These ventures can be a partnership, a separate legal entity, or a contractual agreement. Furthermore, there is no designated governing body for overseeing joint ventures’ operations, although they may be subjected to various laws and regulations depending on the industry.

Examples of Joint Venture

The following are some examples of a joint venture project:

Start Your Free Investment Banking Course

Download Corporate Valuation, Investment Banking, Accounting, CFA Calculator & others

#1 Verily and GlaxoSmithKline

Verily, the life sciences unit of Alphabet Inc. (Google’s parent company), entered into a joint venture agreement with the British pharmaceutical company, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), to develop bioelectric medicines. The project aimed to create miniature electronic implants that treat various conditions, including asthma and diabetes. The estimated cost of the venture was $715 million.

Under the agreement, GSK will have a majority ownership of 55% in the joint venture, while Alphabet will hold a minority ownership of 45%. This partnership aimed to combine GSK’s pharmaceutical expertise with Alphabet’s advanced technologies to develop innovative treatments for various health conditions that can improve the quality of life for patients worldwide.

#2 Uber and Volvo

Taxi giant Uber and heavy vehicle manufacturer Volvo announced a joint venture agreement to develop self-driving cars. The two companies planned to jointly invest $300 million in the project, each contributing $150 million. Hence, the ownership ratio between the two companies was 50%-50%.

The joint venture aimed to develop autonomous vehicles that could be used for ride-hailing services. Uber provided its ride-hailing services and autonomous technology expertise, while Volvo contributed its experience in automotive design and manufacturing.

#3 Sony and Ericsson

Sony Ericsson was a joint venture between Japanese electronics conglomerate Sony Corporation and Swedish telecommunications firm Ericsson, established in 2001. The collaboration aimed to manufacture mobile phones and other gadgets under the brand name “Sony Ericsson.”

The joint venture combined Sony’s expertise in consumer electronics with Ericsson’s expertise in mobile telephony. It became one of the largest mobile phone manufacturers in the world, known for producing some of the most innovative devices, such as the Walkman. In 2012, Sony acquired Ericsson’s share in the joint venture and renamed it Sony Mobile Communications.

#4 NBC and Disney

NBC Universal Television Group (a subsidiary of Comcast) and Disney ABC Television Group (a subsidiary of The Walt Disney Company) entered into a joint venture in 2008 to create a new online video streaming platform “Hulu.”

The aim was to provide a high-quality streaming service allowing viewers to watch TV shows, movies, and other content on computers, laptops, and mobile devices. In 2022, Hulu had over 48 million subscribers valued at over $25 billion.

#5 Kellogg’s and Wilmar

Another joint venture formation example is between Kellogg’s and Wilmar International Limited. The former wanted to expand its cereals and other snack foods business in the Chinese market.

The partnership allowed Kellogg’s to benefit from Wilmar’s extensive distribution and supply chain network in China. In contrast, Wilmar was able to expand its business and streams of revenue. The joint venture was a successful partnership that helped both companies attain their business objectives.

#6 Microsoft and Cruise

Microsoft and Cruise formed a strategic partnership in January 2021 to speed up the commercialization of driverless vehicles. Microsoft will invest $2 billion in Cruise as part of the joint venture, and Cruise will use Microsoft’s cloud computing and AI technology to create and deploy self-driving vehicles.

The partnership between Microsoft and Cruise also includes GM (or General Motors), the parent organization of Cruise. GM acquired Cruise in 2016 and has since been heavily investing in the development of self-driving technology.

#7 Apple and Unicom

Apple and China Unicom entered into a joint venture in 2009 to bring the iPhone to China’s huge growing market. As per the agreement, China Unicom became the exclusive carrier for the iPhone in China and agreed to purchase a certain number of iPhones from Apple over three years.

This was Apple’s official breakthrough into China’s telecommunications sector. However, Apple encountered substantial obstacles in China, such as fierce competition from local smartphone manufacturers and government rules that hampered the company’s ability to completely penetrate the Chinese market.

#8 Mercedes-Benz and Volvo

In 2020, Daimler (now Mercedes-Benz) and Volvo Group signed a joint venture to design and deploy recharge stations for heavy-duty trucks and coaches. The firms agreed to invest 1.2 billion Euros over the next few years, with Daimler and Volvo Group holding a 50% stake in the initiative. The collaboration was viewed as a significant step in developing sustainable transportation systems.

#9 ExxonMobil and Indian Oil Corporation

ExxonMobil and Indian Oil Corporation, alongside Chart Industries, have agreed upon a joint venture to build a virtual pipeline project in India. The objective is to transport liquefied natural gas (LNG) via road, rail, and water to areas of the country that currently lack pipelines.

Both ExxonMobil and Indian Oil Corporation are working on innovative supply-chain methods to facilitate gas access across the nation.

More Recent Joint Venture Examples

Reasons for Joint Venture

Here are some reasons for initiating a joint venture project:

Joint ventures are becoming increasingly significant in business as a form of strategic alliance. The trend is expected to continue, with more companies exploring joint ventures to leverage their resources, expertise, and market reach to achieve common business goals.

Additionally, a joint venture can be terminated or liquidated once a specific business objective has been achieved, allowing partners to reap their share of the profits.

Recommended Articles

Here are some further articles to learn more:

• Example Of Fixed Cost With Explanation
• Risk Assessment Example
• Monopolistic Competition Examples
• Advantages of Joint Venture

*Please provide your correct email id. Login details for this Free course will be emailed to you

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy .

Corporate Valuation, Investment Banking, Accounting, CFA Calculator & others

Forgot Password?

This website or its third-party tools use cookies, which are necessary to its functioning and required to achieve the purposes illustrated in the cookie policy. By closing this banner, scrolling this page, clicking a link or continuing to browse otherwise, you agree to our Privacy Policy

Explore 1000+ varieties of Mock tests View more

Submit Next Question

🚀 Limited Time Offer! - 🎁 ENROLL NOW

• Undergraduate
• High School
• Architecture
• American History
• Asian History
• Antique Literature
• American Literature
• Asian Literature
• Classic English Literature
• World Literature
• Creative Writing
• Linguistics
• Criminal Justice
• Legal Issues
• Anthropology
• Archaeology
• Political Science
• World Affairs
• African-American Studies
• East European Studies
• Latin-American Studies
• Native-American Studies
• West European Studies
• Family and Consumer Science
• Social Issues
• Women and Gender Studies
• Social Work
• Natural Sciences
• Pharmacology
• Earth science
• Agriculture
• Agricultural Studies
• Computer Science
• IT Management
• Mathematics
• Investments
• Engineering and Technology
• Engineering
• Aeronautics
• Medicine and Health
• Alternative Medicine
• Communications and Media
• Advertising
• Communication Strategies
• Public Relations
• Educational Theories
• Teacher's Career
• Chicago/Turabian
• Company Analysis
• Education Theories
• Shakespeare
• Canadian Studies
• Food Safety
• Relation of Global Warming and Extreme Weather Condition
• Movie Review
• Admission Essay
• Annotated Bibliography
• Application Essay
• Article Critique
• Article Review
• Article Writing
• Book Review
• Business Plan
• Business Proposal
• Capstone Project
• Cover Letter
• Creative Essay
• Dissertation
• Dissertation - Abstract
• Dissertation - Conclusion
• Dissertation - Discussion
• Dissertation - Hypothesis
• Dissertation - Introduction
• Dissertation - Literature
• Dissertation - Methodology
• Dissertation - Results
• GCSE Coursework
• Grant Proposal
• Marketing Plan
• Multiple Choice Quiz
• Personal Statement
• Power Point Presentation
• Power Point Presentation With Speaker Notes
• Questionnaire
• Reaction Paper

Research Paper

• Research Proposal
• SWOT analysis
• Thesis Paper
• Online Quiz
• Literature Review
• Movie Analysis
• Statistics problem
• Math Problem
• All papers examples
• How It Works
• Money Back Policy
• Terms of Use
• Privacy Policy
• We Are Hiring

Joint Venture, Essay Example

Pages: 5

Words: 1312

Hire a Writer for Custom Essay

Use 10% Off Discount: "custom10" in 1 Click 👇

You are free to use it as an inspiration or a source for your own work.

Joint Venture between De Beers Diamond Company and Botswana

De Beers Company, the dominant seller of “rough stones” in the world discovered a massive diamond mine in Orapa, a town in Botswana in 1967. The company thus spent $33 million, and four years later, the mine was ready for production of diamonds. The opening of mine officiated by the country’s president, Seretse Khama. De Beers Company built relations with the country with a 50-50 joint venture where it agreed to sell 15% of the Company to the government. De Beers Company decided to contribute in helping to build a civil society by donating money, building roads, hospitals, and schools for the country. De Beers worked together with the government of Botswana to deal with H.I.V and AIDS. Employment in Botswana promoted where executives in the company were Black African (Diamonds, 8/9/2008). In March 2008, De Beers opted to shut down its diamond sorting facility in London to open a larger facility in Gaborone. This helped Botswana’s economy grow by hiring staff from Botswana. The opening of this mine facilitated the economic growth of Botswana from being the world’s poorest country to being a prosperous country in Africa. Botswana’s per capita income increased from $80 to $6000 per year in Botswana. De Beers Company formed just a competitive advantage that benefits both parties. It forms an admirable example of a good citizen as it subscribes to the philosophy that its success supported by social and economic responsibility. It did not only maximize its profit, but also helped to improve the economy and the living standards for Botswana and the people.

A challenge occurred in the 20th century where De Beers became a cruel monopolistic competitor. De Beers Company dominated 80 % of the market and became a failure since they charged whatever they wanted sine consumers had no other choice (Goldman, Ch.2, p.30).They used a strategy of raising the prices of diamond every other time to control supply. They only sold enough diamonds to meet demand to merchants and traders, creating scarcity. In 1990, the demand dropped, and inventory increased up to $5 billion. De Beers Company failed to ask Canada to be its cartel even though it is another country with high supply of diamonds (Goldsmith, Ch.12, p.244). This created a rebel where people mined diamond and sold it to buy weapons. The blood diamond trade then started, and it seriously affected the diamond market. De Beers stopped buying diamonds from third parties and only focused on its own selling. It was able to get 100 other dealers to follow this rule and worked together to boycott the other groups. De Beers Company and the other dealers formed a group of competitors who jointly refuse to deal with any another competitor or group of competitors (Goldsmith, Ch.12, p.247). Kimberly Process came in and significantly reduced the blood diamond trade. The process ensured that buyers obtained legally mined diamonds (Friedman, 10/8/2008). Joint ventures were there after formed which have slowly corrected the monopolistic competition. The De Beers Company no longer held the supply to raise prices unreasonably. Joint Ventures also increased manufacturing capacity at lower cost. Therefore, De Beers earned more profit when it controlled only 40% of the diamond market rather than 80% of it.

The government of Botswana has a role of controlling all economic activities within the country with intelligence. It should have the power to block companies from gaining market power and employ public to prompt companies to contest one another in the marketplace. The government of Botswana should have control over companies that reach a point of being monopolies with self-interests. The government should protect the consumer. It should be intelligent enough to sit on the sidelines since innovation and international rivalry does a better job of checking corporate power than the government can. The government ought to build strong relationships with innovators and inventors to gain its advantage. This is evident that the Botswana government played it honestly and intelligently as it worked hand in hand with De Beers. With its support and encouragement, De Beers helped the economic growth of the country; the living standard of Botswana’s and at the same time, the government helped the company in earning profit and getting resources.

Flush with Energy

Denmark badly hammed by the 1973 Arab oil embargo created an energy policy. They responded to that crisis in a systematic way that makes it energy dependent today. The first thing they did was burning the Sunday driving for a while. There was an imposed set of gasoline taxes, the buildings and appliances had to be energy efficient, and there were CO2 taxes for the Danes. The shaping the market with energy taxes by the government-stimulated innovations in clean power and the Danes forced to innovate more. They recycled waste heat from coal-fired power plants for home heating and hot water. They also incinerated their trash in central stations to provide home heating. Prices of gasoline further increased to break addiction to oil. This forced 50% of the Danes using bicycles to reach their places during rush hour. Other energy efficient practices included ensuring lights in such places as hotels triggered by energy-saving motion detectors. The toilets too fixed with two flushing powers depending on what exactly one is flushing.

These allowed them to grow their economy where Denmark’s exports of energy efficiency products grew. Energy technology exports rose by 8 % in 2007. This was a recommendable increase compared to a 2% rise in 2007. Now, unemployment in Denmark is 1.6 percent, which is relatively low while its 99% energy importation from Middle East has reduced to 0%. Other economic benefits associated include reduced traffic during rush hour. This ensures less pollution compared to when there is a traffic jam.

The social benefits associated with these inventions were the birth to a Danish clean-power industry because of the 20% energy from wind, which is non-pollutant. Less obesity experienced as people do exercise as during cycling.

Smart taxes and incentives have spurred Danish energy companies to innovate. Right now, Denmark’s is the world’s biggest wind turbine company that is most competitive in the world today. It, however, has had 35 new competitors coming out of China in the last 18 months.

The US will certainly adopt the Denmark energy policy in due time to produce clean power. This is especially due to its climate change. The US congress will certainly encourage and adapt the extension of production tax credits in order to develop wind energy in America.

The tax-brakes policy idea is an excellent one. The society will benefit considerably by its introduction, as it encourages less consumption of energy by people which in turn reduces national demand for energy and contributions to global warming, it ease traffic congestion and bring down the cost of road maintenance. They also lighten the financial and social burdens associated with auto accidents.

The government uses a subsidiary incentive by giving tax credits for driving less. It rewards taxpayers for behavior like avoiding the car to take public transportation, walking, or biking where everyone saved money. The federal government could set a baseline annual driving distance per registered vehicle. In this pay-per-mile system, drivers awarded tax credits regarding on the number of fewer miles they drove. Taxpayers who do not drive altogether obtain or rather receive the highest possible number of credits. The government increases tax credits for people who drive at off-peak hours or maintain moderate speeds.

This approach is a fair policy that advantages both the taxpayers and the government. While the taxpayers benefit from the less costs incurred on fuel and the tax incentives, the government on the other hand saves on revenue spent on bringing in energy. The society also benefits from the reduced environmental pollution and global warming.

Works Cited

Goldsmith, Elizabeth. Resource Management for Individuals and Families. Cengage Learning, 2005.

Friedman, Thomas. Flush With Energy. Policy Issue II A, August 10, 2008.

Stuck with your Essay?

Get in touch with one of our experts for instant help!

American Literature, Research Paper Example

Operational Issues, Essay Example

Time is precious

don’t waste it!

Plagiarism-free guarantee

Privacy guarantee

Secure checkout

Money back guarantee

Related Essay Samples & Examples

Voting as a civic responsibility, essay example.

Pages: 1

Words: 287

Utilitarianism and Its Applications, Essay Example

Words: 356

The Age-Related Changes of the Older Person, Essay Example

Pages: 2

Words: 448

The Problems ESOL Teachers Face, Essay Example

Pages: 8

Words: 2293

Should English Be the Primary Language? Essay Example

Pages: 4

Words: 999

The Term “Social Construction of Reality”, Essay Example

Words: 371

Thinking of forming a joint venture? Here's what you need to know

If your company is considering joining forces with another business for a special project, you should first understand the options for such a joint venture. Learn the different ways to form such an arrangement and the potential advantages of each.

Find out more about business management

by   Edward A. Haman, Esq.

Edward A. Haman is a freelance writer, who is the author of numerous self-help legal books. He has practiced law in H...

Read more...

Updated on: December 7, 2023 · 4 min read

Joint venture basics

Forming a joint venture, choosing the form of a joint venture.

Many businesses enter into cooperative endeavors with other companies. For example, two small companies might pool their financial resources for a project, either because the endeavor is too large for either to pursue alone or so that each business can overcome its weaknesses by tapping into the strengths of the other.

If you are considering such a cooperative project, you need to know your options in forming a joint venture.

A joint venture is a business arrangement between two or more business entities to cooperate in a particular business enterprise, either for a limited time or ongoing. Each entity may continue to engage in other business activities that are not part of the joint venture. The arrangement is not the same as a merger, in which one or both of the companies cease to exist as a separate entity.

A business entity that enters into a joint venture is referred to as an original entity, which may be organized as a limited liability company (LLC), a sole proprietorship, some form of partnership , or a corporation.

It is also possible for two or more original business entities to enter into a less formal cooperative agreement known as a strategic alliance, in which the companies collaborate in some manner that is expected to be mutually beneficial but without contributing resources or forming a separate entity.

For example, the three separate companies Disney, NBC Universal, and News Corp formed a joint venture by creating a new entity called Hulu. Ford Motor Company and Eddie Bauer entered into a strategic alliance whereby they used each other's brand recognition to gain new customers but without creating a separate entity or pooling their financial resources: Ford placed the Eddie Bauer logo on its upscale SUVs, while Eddie Bauer placed the Ford logo on a set of luggage.

However, there is no legal definition of strategic alliance, and there is no distinct line separating a strategic alliance from a joint venture. The exact nature of cooperation varies with the nature of the businesses involved and their venture.

Just as an original entity can be organized in one of several ways, a joint venture can be set up as a partnership, LLC , or corporation. Or, rather than form a separate entity, a joint venture can be created as a contractual relationship.

For example, if ABC Enterprises LLC and XYZ Corporation wish to cooperate in a joint venture, there are two ways in which they can do so:

• Form a new entity. ABC and XYZ could choose to form A&X Corporation, in which some shares of stock are owned by ABC and some shares owned by XYZ. However, the new entity may just as easily be an LLC or some form of partnership, in which case ABC and XYZ are each members of the joint venture LLC or have a partnership agreement between them.
• Remain separate, but enter into a contract for the joint venture. This is commonly called a joint venture agreement or joint venture contract. If this option is chosen, appropriate representatives of ABC and XYZ sign a contract outlining the nature and goals of the joint venture, the contributions to be made by each entity, how the entities will share in the profits or losses, how the project will be managed, and other details.

A joint venture that is organized as a separate entity is almost always organized as either a corporation or an LLC due to the limited personal liability offered for the owners. This is especially important if any of the original business entities are organized as a sole proprietorship or as some form of partnership that does not give all partners limited liability. Any original business entity that is an LLC already has limited liability for its members, while any original entity that is a corporation already has limited liability for its shareholders.

However, even if an original entity is set up as an LLC or a corporation, it can still be a good idea to organize the joint venture as an LLC or a corporation. Doing so may offer the original entity some protection for its assets that are not contributed to the joint venture.

For taxation purposes, a joint venture formed as a corporation is taxed as a corporation. Similarly, a joint venture formed as an LLC is taxed as a partnership, unless it elects to be taxed as a corporation.

Determining whether a joint venture is best created by an agreement or by forming some type of separate entity requires consideration of various factors, including the nature of the joint venture, management structure, limitation of liability, and taxation. If you need further help deciding which options is best for you, consider seeking professional advice from a business attorney or tax consultant.

You may also like

What does 'inc.' mean in a company name?

'Inc.' in a company name means the business is incorporated, but what does that entail, exactly? Here's everything you need to know about incorporating your business.

October 9, 2023 · 10min read

Why do I need to conduct a trademark search?

By knowing what other trademarks are out there, you will understand if there is room for the mark that you want to protect. It is better to find out early, so you can find a mark that will be easier to protect.

October 4, 2023 · 4min read

How to get an LLC and start a limited liability company

Considering an LLC for your business? The application process isn't complicated, but to apply for an LLC, you'll have to do some homework first.

May 29, 2024 · 11min read

Cultural Integration of Joint Ventures Factors Essay

• To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
• As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
• As a template for you assignment

Introduction

Outline of the topic, critical reflection on methods, tabular analysis, literature review, analysis and critical discussion, learning statement, reference list.

Emerging technologies in the fields of communication and transport have opened access to the international market for mid-sized and large corporations. It is common to find American companies operating in China and Japanese firms having their branches in the United Kingdom or Russia. According to Britnell (2019), globalisation has made it easy for firms to operate in the international market. Most of the trade restrictions that existed in the past have been eliminated as countries come to understand that they cannot isolate themselves from the global community. As Ahammad et al . (2017) explain, firm seeking to enter a foreign market can choose one of the many strategies based on its size, government regulations in the foreign market, specific goals that should be realised within a given period and many other factors. Foreign direct investment, joint ventures, franchising, mergers and acquisition, partnerships and licensing are some of the popular strategies that a company can use to make an entry into a foreign market.

Joint venture is one of the popular strategies that companies often use to explore new markets. In China, many American, British, French and Canadian companies have had joint ventures with local firms as they focus on exploiting opportunities in this market (Adams, 2016). The strategy is considered suitable when a foreign firm has a limited understanding of the local market. By partnering with a company that already exists in the local market, the foreign firm will not have to spend many resources on market research and popularising their brand. Operational costs will be shared by all the parties involved based on the agreement they make. However, Yunker (2017) warns that this strategy is often affected by cultural differences of the organisations involved in the deal. Work culture and ethics in the United States is significantly different from that in Japan. When companies from these two countries have to work as a unit, the management must first find effective strategies of dealing with cultural differences (Huanga and Crotts, 2019). In some cases, managing these cultural differences becomes a major challenge that may impede the normal operation of the new company.

The researcher is interested in investigating factors that affect the cultural integration of joint ventures, especially when the companies involved are from different countries. Kedmenec and Strašek (2017) argue that the desire to investigate this issue was motivated by the increasing cases of failures of joint ventures in China. The country remains one of the most attractive markets for large and mid-sized corporations not only because of the size of its population but also its advanced technology and improved infrastructure. However, cases where foreign firms struggle to achieve success locally are becoming alarmingly high (Britnell, 2019). This paper is important to practicing managers because it provides them with crucial knowledge that can help them avoid mistakes that other companies have made in their joint venture strategies. Policy-makers will benefit from this study because they will understand how laws they make affect the business environment in the country. To the academics, this report will enrich knowledge in the field of cultural integration in joint ventures.

The researcher chose this topic because of its increasing relevance in the modern business environment. Other people will find the study interesting because of the many challenges that large corporations face as they try to embrace joint ventures as a means of expanding to new markets. As Okwir et al . (2018) explain, it is often easier for an organization to partner with firms that are already successful in a new market to avoid challenges of dealing with new market forces. However, this approach is often riddled with cultural challenges that make it difficult for companies to work as a unit. When two independent companies have to work as a unit, one of the important factors that should be addressed is the need to create a culture that all parties find acceptable. Adams (2016) argues that finding a middle ground in such cases may be a major problem if the two companies are from different countries with conflicting cultural practices. This review came at a time tome when many companies are struggling to have successful joint ventures in China. The outcome of this investigation will offer them a proper guide on how to select their partners and how to inculcate working relationships that can guarantee these firms desired levels of success.

The researcher was keen on using an effective method of conducting the literature review. As Britnell (2019) advises, when conducting a literature review, it is critical to find reliable sources that can help in gathering the right data. It was crucial to collect data from specific sources in the study. Google and Google Scholars are popular among scholars when searching for online sources. However, they were avoided in this study because they have been criticised for their inability to filter these sources to ensure that only those that are peer-reviewed are made available. The researcher made sure that only peer-reviewed research papers from ABS listed journals are included in the study. The strategy was meant to ensure that research papers used met specific quality criteria desired in the study.

The researcher used various key words and phrases in the study to conduct research. They included joint ventures, cultural integration, globalisation, market entry strategies among others. The inclusion criterion was that the source had to be peer-reviewed journal. The source must have been published within the last 10 years to ensure that information provided is current. It was also necessary to have exclusion criteria. Books were excluded because they were not considered peer-reviewed sources. Older sources published over 10 years ago were also avoided. Web pages and blogs were also classified as non-academic sources that could not be used in the study. The researcher was able to identify 60 academic papers. 24 were discarded for various reasons, which meant that the researcher remained with 36 peer-reviewed sources.

The researcher chose the narrative literature review, also known as traditional literature review as the most appropriate method for this study. It critiques and summarises a body of research then draw conclusions about the study that has been undertaken in a particular subject (Kedmenec and Strašek, 2017). It helps in providing a comprehensive background of issue being investigated, synthesising information from different sources, identifying potential knowledge gaps and presenting findings in a simple traditional approach. The main advantage of this method of literature review is that it is simple to use and it focuses on providing synthesis of knowledge on a given topic. According to Okwir et al . (2018), this method is essential when conducting an investigation on a topic that is widely researched. Joint ventures and how they are affected by the problem of cultural integration is a topic that has attracted the attention of many scholars over the recent past (Britnell, 2019). As such, finding the right materials for the study was not a major challenge. Using the strategy discussed above, the researcher was able to access the important materials that were needed for the study.

It is important to note that this method has some disadvantages worth noting. This method is not as rigorous in reviewing literature as systematic literature review. As such, it may not be the best method of answering highly structured questions. However, this limitation was not a major concern in this study because the researcher was able to achieve the intended goal in the study.

The preliminary review of the literature that was conducted at the proposal development stage showed that various factors can affect the cultural integration of joint ventures. One can choose various strategies of analysing the issue, as Lu et al . (2018) observe. In this case, thematic review of the literature was chosen as the most appropriate approach. The six dimensions of Hofstede model was chosen as the standard themes that can help in reviewing different themes that explain how cultural integration can be affected by joint ventures. Table 1 below shows sources used based on their classification into the six themes.

In the section above, the researcher defined the inclusion and exclusion criteria that were observed in selecting appropriate sources for this study. The researcher was keen on identifying peer-reviewed empirical studies to help in investigating factors that affect the cultural integration of joint ventures. The research proposal outlined the significance of selecting sources from specific databases. Journals which appear in the ABS journal list were considered reputable enough to be included in this investigation and they formed the basis of this review.

Analysis of the Literature

The findings from this narrative clearly indicate that numerous factors affect cultural integration of joint ventures within a given country. In the proposal, it was indicated that the review will take the form of thematic analysis. Other strategies such as classifying sources based on their year of publication or methods that were used would not facilitate effective investigation of the issue. Thematic analysis made it possible to articulate these factors and how they impact on cultural integration in joint ventures. The researcher classified these themes based on Hofstede’s model of cultural dimensions. As shown in table 1 above, sources were identified that discusses each of the six dimensions of Hofstede’s model. They explain how cultural conflicts often arise in an organisation and steps that can be taken to address these issues.

Power Distance Index (PDI)

Power distance is one of the elements in the Hofstede’s model. According to Shirodkar, Konara and McGuire (2017), this element defines the measurement of the acceptance of hierarchical power by individuals within a given society. In some countries, there is an extreme respect for those in authority. A good example is North Korea where the leader has absolute power. This power is shared with those who are appointed to various positions to help the ruler government the nation. Lu et al . (2018) argue that the society has embraced this culture of extreme power and rarely do they question instructions issued by those who are holding superior positions. The Arab countries also have such high power index where people highly respect individuals in powerful positions. Kedmenec and Strašek (2017) explain that in a culture with high power index, communication flows through well-defined channels and no one is expected to go against it. On the other hand, countries with low power index embrace a less strict and less rigid leadership approach. Subordinates and members of the society can easily challenge those in authority and they expect their views to be taken into consideration when making important policies (Mehta and Dementieva, 2017). Countries such as Austria, the United Kingdom and the United States have low power distance index. Those in position of power must understand that they serve people and must respect their opinion.

In the business context, power distance index is crucial in defining the communication approach and the general relationship among people holding different positions of power. In the United States and Austria where the power distance index is relatively low, most companies embrace open-door communication approach where junior officers can easily contact their superiors when they have an issue that they feel should be addressed (Ahammad et al ., 2017). When it comes to policy-making, top managers are expected to consult their subordinates, especially if the new regulation is likely to affect everyone in the organisation. The management approach is more flexible and leaders understand that sometimes they can be guided by the expertise of their juniors. On the other hand, companies in countries such as North Korea and the Middle East, the approach to human resource management is significantly different. Communication follows a strict hierarchy, where a junior officer is expected to report to the immediate supervisor (Wang, Rieger and Hens, 2017). At no point is one expected to question the authority and instruction of the one who is senior to them. The culture that an organisation embraces often reflects the societal beliefs and practices.

When companies from two countries have a joint venture, one of the issues that the management has to address is cultural integration. They have to agree on the acceptable rules and regulations that would guide communication system and the management of human resource. Boon, Hartog and Lepak (2019) explain that the power distance index gap will define the ease with which the integration can be achieved. A Chinese company can easily integrate with a North Korean firm because the gap is insignificant. In both countries, there is a strict respect to those in authority. However, challenges emerge when a Chinese firm has to integrate with an Austrian company.

In Austria, it is normal for people to challenge those who are in power. That is not the case in China. If such practices are embraced in the joint venture, Mehta and Dementieva (2017) argue that there can be a culture shock. The same will be the case when rigid leadership is forced on an Austrian employee who believes that they have the right to express their views freely and contribute towards policy development (Courtney, Goldenberg and Boyd, 2020). In such cases, it may take a while for the two companies to agree on a standard practice that they need to embrace. It is always advisable to blend the two cultures but in a way that remains sensitive to beliefs and practices in the host country. Employees of the foreign firm must be ready to learn how to operate effectively under such new rules.

Individualism vs. Collectivism (IDV)

Individualism versus collectivism index is another factor that defines the culture in a given country, which ultimately influences a culture that an organisation embraces. According to Tian et al . (2018), a high IDV score means the culture places great emphasis on individualism. Such people value privacy and are not bothered by successes or failure of others. They work to better themselves and believe that that everyone has the right to lead their lives the way they deem fit as long as they do not interfere with the rest of the society (Cyr, Gefenand Walczuch, 2017). They rarely mix work life with social life and believe that it is necessary for people to have debates as the only way of expressing one’s ideas towards a given issue. They take up personal challenges and often acknowledge individual accomplishments (Suryanto, Thaib and Muliyati, 2019). Many countries in the west, especially in North America and parts of Western Europe have a high IDV score.

A culture that has low IDV score embraces collectivism. It emphasises the need to have a collective success instead of individual accomplishments. Shahid (2017) argues that one has to view self as part of the larger system and that their actions should be focused on achieving the success of the entire community. People are encouraged to avoid actions that may threaten unity of the team. Maintaining harmony within the group is given precedence over one’s desire to achieve personal ambitions (Xia et al ., 2019). In such a culture, people are encouraged to avoid giving negative feedbacks if it may elicit disagreements. They have to follow the guidance of those in power as they are believed to have the wisdom needed to guide the team. A company is likely to embrace the culture that is common in the country. It means that collectivism is common among countries in Africa, China and other parts of Asia. On the other hand, many organisations in the United States and Western Europe are more likely to embrace individualism.

In a joint venture, when a French firm has to work alongside a Chinese company as one organisation, it is expected that there will be a culture clash. The Chinese company will prefer having a setting where people focus on the overall success of the organisation (Xia et al ., 2019). It means that individual output may not matter much if the success of the entire organisation is compromised. It means that employees must focus on working collectively to achieve the desired organisational goal. On the other hand, the French company will take a different approach to enhancing success. They will emphasise on the role of an individual in ensuring that the entire organisation is a success. It means that they may suggest embracing policies such as performance measurement where the company regularly evaluates the output of an individual employee to determine their actual value to the organisation (Arieli and Sagiv, 2018). Such policies are rare in organisations that embrace collectivism as a culture that defines an organisation’s operations. Such major differences may have major negative impact on cultural integration of the two companies. The top managers must find ways of creating a harmonious working relationship.

Uncertainty Avoidance Index (UAI)

Uncertainty avoidance index is another important factor that defines the culture of a society. In a culture where uncertainty avoidance is high, people will try to avoid taking actions that may not yield specific outcome. These people will avoid untested practices because they feel it may have undesirable consequences. Stojcic, Kewen and Xiaopeng (2016) argue that people in low-income countries tend to be risk averse because they lack alternatives if one of the options they have fails to work. On the other hand, people with low uncertainty avoidance index tend to be explorative. They understand the fact that sometimes they can fail to achieve their goal when they try something for the first time (Singh, Chernikov and Singh, 2017). They believe that even if they do not succeed in their first attempt, it will be a learning curve. As such, these people tend to be innovative as they try to learn how to undertake different tasks using various approaches. Uncertainty avoidance index is low in high income countries such as in the United States and parts of Europe (Tiwari, Patro and Shaikh, 2018). These people know that if they fail in one endeavour, they will have alternative ways to achieve success.

When two companies from different countries have a joint venture, uncertainty avoidance may be a major concern that may cause culture conflict. In China, there is a culture of avoiding uncertainty. Most of the businesses prefer venturing into opportunities where they can predict and easily control the outcome (Rhee, Alexandra and Powell, 2020). On the other hand, many American firms do not fear experimenting. The problem is that such experiments often result into failure when they are tried for the first time (Jang et al . 2018). The belief that such failures provide a path to success makes these companies to embrace these experiments. One must understand that such failures involve costs that the company have to incur (Yoo and Lee, 2019). All the parties in a joint venture must agree on the approach that has to be taken when dealing with risks to ensure that there is harmony within the organisation.

Masculinity vs. Femininity (MAS)

This index focuses on the roles between men and women in the society. In a society with a high MAS index, there is a distinct role for men and women. Chowdhury (2017) explains that in such societies, gender roles do not overlap and one is expected to behave in accordance with their gender. In such societies, men are expected to demonstrate their ability to provide for their families and to achieve success despite challenges that they may face. Women are expected to be less aggressive, especially when they have to compete against men. Japan has one of the highest scores in MAS index. Countries with low MAS index do not place emphasis on one’s gender when assigning roles and defining expectations. Gender roles overlap and the only factor that is often considered when assigning responsibility is the capability of an individual. In a business environment, promotions are rarely based on one’s gender. Instead, one focuses on the commitment, experience, capabilities and such other traits that an individual demonstrates (Yang and Merrill, 2017). Sweden has one of the lowest MAS index and women enjoy equal opportunities as men.

Challenges often arise when two or more companies with conflicting MAS cultural practices merge to work as a unit. As Mehta and Dementieva (2017) observe, such differences may limit cultural integration in a company. When a Swedish firm considers partnering with a Japanese company on a joint venture, issues may emerge in their cultural integration. The Swedish firm will expect their partner to respect and accord women equal respect and opportunities as men (Shahid, 2017). On the other hand, the Japanese will be expecting women within the company to be less aggressive and willing to give way whenever it comes to a competitive pursuit of a goal against men (Ott and Michailova, 2018). The Japanese have embraced the culture that gives men priority on various issues in the workplace. They are viewed as hardworking people with the capacity to endure both physical and emotional challenges that may arise at work. On the other hand, the Swedish believe that toughness and commitment of an individual cannot be defined by their gender (Seeck, 2019). The two extremes in the MAS index will have to be moderated to create a harmonious workplace environment.

Long-term Orientation vs. Short-term Orientation (LTO)

Long-term versus short-term orientation may not seem to be a major factor that defines the culture of a society, but Savino, Petruzzelli and Albino, (2017) explains that its significance cannot be ignored. In countries with short-term orientation, people focus on how to achieve success in small tasks that have to be completed within a week or a month (Agostini and Nosella, 2017). There is a belief that the only way of achieving a long-term vision is to break a major project into small tasks then focus on completing these tasks within a given period. The United States is one such country where short-term orientation is high. On the other hand, long-term orientation focuses on futuristic success (Tower, Hewett and Fenik, 2019). Emphasis is placed on ensuring that a clear platform for future success is created. Such people acknowledge that it is possible that one can fail in their short-term tasks but they will be considered successful if they are on the path towards achieving long-term goals.

When two companies with such a conflicting culture have to work on a project as one entity, differences are likely to emerge. López‐Duarte, Vidal‐Suárez and González‐Díaz (2016) argue that one of the problems that may arise is in planning of tasks. The company with short-term orientation would prefer breaking the entire project into simple tasks that have to be completed within a short period. These tasks must then be assigned to specific individuals who have to complete them successfully using given resources. The management will be interested in ensuring that each of these tasks is completed successfully within the schedule. On the other hand, the company with the long-term orientation would want an approach that emphasises on the overall success of the entire project (Dumetz and Cadil, 2018). They may want an approach where people work on different aspects of the project but with the goal of ensuring that the entire team is successful. Individual’s performance should not be given precedence over that of the entire organisation.

When facing such a major cultural conflict, Okwir et al . (2018) explain that it is essential for parties involved in the venture to accept the existence of such a major difference and agree on the approach that needs to be followed. It is essential for the parties to understand the goal that they need to achieve through the joint venture. They should then assess forces both in the internal and external environment. They can then determine a culture that would be most effective in achieving the desired goal based on the forces that have to be managed. Cultural integration may become a challenge if each of the parties involved fails to embrace the need to compromise, especially when they are presented with new facts that their organisational culture ignored.

Indulgence vs. Restraint (IND)

The model identifies indulgence versus restraint as a major cultural difference that may have a direct impact on cultural integration in a joint venture. In countries with a high IND ratio such as the United States, people are encouraged to have gratification and enjoy their lives as events may allow (Özdaşli, Penez and Koca, 2016). They can celebrate their small achievements without the fear of being attacked. In such countries, there is always the belief of a better tomorrow. As such, they do not have to fear about the future. Their focus is to concentrate on realising their dreams and enjoying every milestone that they make (Guo et al ., 2018). People are encouraged to focus on personal happiness in such a setting. Freedom of speech is also encouraged as a virtue that creates a harmonious workplace environment. There is a belief that the success of the organisation depends on the ability of everyone to express their views and to participate actively in policy development and implementation.

On the other hand, countries with low IND index have a complete opposite view to life and progress in the society. Achim, Văidean and Borlea (2020) explain that in this culture, people tend to be pessimists. They have a constant fear of the unknown in everything they do. As such, they feel that they are not entitled to celebrate the little success they have. In this restrictive culture that is common in Russia and other parts of Eastern Europe, people are expected to be constantly aware of the possibility of failures that may erase all the small gains that had been already made. As such, secrecy is highly encouraged as one works on a project. Celebration can only be acceptable when the entire project is successfully completed (Lu et al ., 2019). People are expected to avoid making jokes in formal settings because it may create lack of seriousness towards undertaking a given task. Junior officers are expected to respect and strictly follow guidelines provided by those in power (Luria, Cnaan and Boehm, 2019). Criticising the authority is highly uncommon in such a setting.

A joint venture between an American firm and a Russian corporation may likely face such challenges that may affect their operation. Achieving cultural integration in such a setting may be a big challenge. The American firm will favour an environment where everyone can speak freely and celebrate the small successes that they make in different assignments given to them. Tower, Hewett and Fenik (2019) argue that the company may also encourage its employees to be actively involved in policy development and implementation by creating communication avenues for everyone. On the other hand, the Russian company may prefer taking a stricter policy where workers have to avoid indulgence until such a time that success is guaranteed. They are expected to have the view that failure is a possibility and when it occurs, it can erase all the progress that had previously been made. They have to remain focused on achieving the larger goal instead of focusing on small successes.

The Russian company would also find it difficult having a communication platform that makes it easy for employees to contact their superiors without following the strict communication hierarchy (Huanga and Crotts, 2019). They believe that subordinates must follow instructions of their superiors without question. Achieving cultural integration among such two companies would require compromise in both cases. Parties must understand the fact that the only way that they can work together in a joint venture is by creating a new culture that makes everyone comfortable. Just like in the above cases, the compromise must be based on the realities that these companies face in the market.

Hofstede’s cultural dimensions have become a major tool that defines challenges which often arise when two companies have to work together in a joint venture. The model identifies six major sources of differences in cultural practice. The study shows that organisational culture is often defined by socio-cultural practices within a country. A company in China is likely to develop an organisational culture that reflects directly on the culture of the community. Fears, aspirations and ambitions of the people of a given country will be reflected in the practices of the country. When a company has to merge with another which comes from a country with significantly different socio-cultural practices, the cultural divide may be pronounced. When an American company has to enter into a joint venture with a Saudi Arabian company, there must be an understanding that people with diverse socio-cultural and religious practices will be brought together.

The problem that often arises in such cases is that what one group views as a standard practice may be offensive to the other group. The Saudi Arabians may have the belief that women should not be given the opportunity to make major contributions on major policy developments because that is what their culture dictates. However, such a belief may be offensive to a young female American executive who believes that she can make a positive difference in the organisation. Similarly, an American executive may have a feeling that issues about religion should not be allowed to affect the ability of a firm to achieve its goals. A Saudi national may take offence with that because of the belief that prayer should be given precedence over any other activity.

Addressing cultural conflicts in joint ventures depends on various factors. One of the steps that a company should take is to select a partner that has a relatively similar organisational culture. It means that when an American company is seeking to have a joint venture with a foreign firm so that they can enter the Chinese market, it is advisable to partner with a British company that is already operating in China. It is likely that cultural differences may not be as big as when the company has to partner with Russian firm. In some cases, it may not be easy to select a partner from a preferred country. In China, most of the foreign companies prefer partnering with local firms that have a proper understanding of the local market. In such a case, it becomes necessary to develop a new culture that every party considers accommodative. As shown in the literature review, each of the parties must be willing to concede something to ensure that they create a system where everyone feels comfortable. They should be guided by both internal and external forces within the country where they operate.

Findings made in this study have significant implications to practicing managers. The study shows that one of the main reasons why joint ventures fail to achieve their intended goals is because of the inability to integrate organisational cultures of the companies involved in the merger. As Adams (2016) observes, managers have the responsibility of assessing the difference in cultural practices and developing a plan of addressing it. Cultural integration will involve creating a culture that all the parties find acceptable. The new culture must take into consideration the national culture of the host country. It means that if an American company partners with a Chinese firm to start operations in Saudi Arabia, the management of the new company must ensure that the new culture reflects the national culture of the country. It should also take into consideration the organisational culture of the two partnering companies from different countries. It is the responsibility of the management to create an enabling environment suitable for all the companies involved in the project.

The policy-makers have an important role in creating an enabling environment for foreign firms seeking to have joint ventures with local companies. The political class have an important role of enacting laws that define operations of businesses in the market. It is common for these politicians to enact laws that may be considered friendly to local corporations. However, in the current competitive business environment, such protectionist approaches may not help local firms because they will not have the capacity to compete favourably in the global market. Some of the cultural practices may also be entrenched or discouraged by the policy-makers within a country. Saudi Arabia is keen on reducing the high MAS index by promoting women to powerful leadership positions. Such practices may help create an environment that foreign firms can flourish. In academics, this report will provide an important source of knowledge about cultural integration in joint ventures. Hofstede’s cultural dimension has been discussed in detail in this dissertation and this information is essential for scholars keen on conducting literature review on the topic.

Cultural integration in joint ventures is critical in ensuring that there is success in such business partnerships. When two or more companies come together to work as a unit to achieve specific goals, one of the most common challenges that they have to address is creating a harmonious workplace environment. When the companies come from different countries with conflicting socio-cultural practices, the gap are organisational culture is likely to be big. Even when the organisations are in the same country, it is highly unlikely that they may have a similar organisational culture. Hofstede’s cultural dimension identifies six primary sources of differences that will emerge in such a setting. The primary role of top managers in such joint ventures is to address these differences and create a new organisational culture that is accommodating to everyone.

In academics, this study will have a significant implication. According to McDuff, Girard and Kaliouby (2017), cultural integration in joint ventures is becoming a major concern for companies seeking partnerships in foreign markets. Studies have shown that one of the factors responsible for failure of these joint ventures is the inability of the companies involved to understand and appreciate the impact that cultural differences may have on a firm’s normal operation. This study will provide important information in management education. It will be possible for current managers who are furthering their education to understand how they can identify these problems to find effective ways of solving them. As Luria, Cnaan and Boehm (2019) explain, it is not possible to solve a problem if it has not been identified and clearly defined. It means that managers must start by acknowledging that cultural differences may be a challenge if it not handled in an appropriate way. When the problem has been identified, the next step is to find a way of achieving cultural integration. They have to create a harmonious workplace environment where all stakeholders will feel comfortable.

The document will have a major implication to future research. The primary goal of the researcher in this academic project was to identify specific factors that affect cultural integration in joint ventures. Information presented in this paper will be critical for future scholars interested in understanding how culture affects joint ventures in different markets. Sources used in this review are credible, which means that the document can be used to provide critical data for other studies. The approach that the researcher took to assess and select appropriate sources was rigorous. Embracing a similar approach is highly advisable when a researcher is interested in identifying credible secondary data sources.

Parties involved must first acknowledge the existence of these major differences. They must appreciate the fact that each company has its unique cultural practices defined by local forces that define its operations. They must value the culture of the other party even if it is completely opposite to what they consider acceptable. The companies must then agree to create a new culture that is a compromise to both based on the forces that they have to face in the new market. The study strongly suggests creating a culture that will reflect socio-political practices in the host country. The approach will ensure that host country nationals will not face serious challenges working for the joint venture. Customers must also find these practices acceptable and aligned to their beliefs. The researcher believes, based on the critical analysis above, that joint ventures can only succeed if cultural conflicts are effectively addressed. Employees from the two companies have to learn to work as a unit under the new environment.

The review of literature has identified many factors that affect cultural integration in joint ventures. The researcher used a wide variety or journal articles conducted using different research methods to understand how these forces affect cultural integration. Findings show that there is a significant difference in cultural practices in different countries despite the current globalisation. Companies in the Middle East have unique organisational culture that is significantly different from practices that are embraced by American companies. If two organisations from these two countries have to work together, they have to find ways of addressing these differences. Although there were no major inconsistencies noticed during the tabular analysis, it is important to note that different sources propose different ways of managing cultural differences.

It is necessary to address strengths and weaknesses of the study. One of the main strengths of the study was that sources used were high quality. The coverage of the literature was appropriate and adequately addressed the issue under investigation. The number of sources used was also adequate enough to address the issue in a comprehensive way. Authors of these journal articles used appropriate methods that focused on understanding various factors that affect cultural integration in joint ventures. The sample sizes in the selected articles were adequate enough to meet the level of saturation needed to provide relevant information about cultural integration. It is important to admit that some of these studies had weaknesses worth mentioning at this stage. The biggest weakness in the study was that most of the sources available focused on comparing the west, especially the United States and Western Europe, with other parts of the world. It was not easy finding sources published in the developing countries that compare them with the rest of the world. Findings made in this study emphasized the need to manage cultural conflicts in joint ventures because of its significance in ensuring that all stakeholders can work in a harmonious environment.

When conducting this research, I have learnt that culture plays a critical role in defining success of joint venture. Previously, I believed that resource allocation and management was the principle reason why many joint ventures fail within the first five years of their operations. Through this study, I have realised that cultural difference is also a major contributor to such failures. Successful companies have learned unique ways of achieving cultural integration. I have leant that managers have to be ready to embrace new beliefs and practices when they decide to explore foreign markets. They have to realise that success of their organisations depend on how well they relate with their customers and the environment that is created for the workers. I have learnt that it is easier for companies from the same country or from countries with similar socio-cultural, economic and political landscape to achieve cultural integration in joint ventures.

This study enabled me to understand the significance of selecting appropriate sources for an academic study. Before starting this project, I trusted Google Scholar as an important online database through which one can have access to reliable sources, especially journals. However, the strict criteria of selecting journals, which focuses on using ABS listed journals, made me realize that not all online databases have reliable sources of journal articles. Google Scholar is not entirely useless as it also has useful articles. I leant that the problem is that it has so many sources, some of which are not reliable. As such, in case one decides to use this database to access data, care should be taken to ensure that only peer-reviewed journals are used.

When conducting this study, the main difficulty that I encounter was having access to the right literature. It was necessary to ensure that all these sources met strict inclusion/exclusion criteria. As such, many sources had to be rejected because they did not meet the set criteria. The current COVID-19 pandemic also limited my ability to have access to the school and local libraries. Some of the rich sources that I had used in my previous research and were available in these libraries could not be accessed in online platforms. If I were to do the same study again, I would make various changes to improve the outcome. Assuming that the corona virus pandemic will no longer be an issue, I will consider collecting data from primary sources.

It would have been better if I could interview a sample of managers of local joint ventures to understand challenges that they always encounter. I would then analyse the data collected both qualitatively and quantitatively to understand various factors that affect cultural integration in joint ventures. Secondary sources used addressed this question adequately. However, conducting a primary data analysis would help to confirm or refute information obtained from these articles. Many people will benefit from this study besides me. Other students will benefit from this document because it provides a detailed discussion about factors that affect cultural integration of joint ventures based on reliable sources. Managers can rely on this document to determine how to address cultural challenges in their companies.

In China, many small and medium-sized companies are keen on attracting foreign companies as a way of expanding their capital. This document will be critical for the managers of these organizations because they will know what it takes to ensure that their joint ventures are successful. They have to select their partners carefully and be ready to embrace new practices, some of which may conflict their standard beliefs. They have to be flexible enough in their strategies in such joint ventures.

Achim, M., Văidean, L. and Borlea, N. (2020) ‘Corruption and health outcomes within an economic and cultural framework’, The European Journal of Health Economics , 21(3), pp. 195-207.

Adams, V. (2016) Global vs. local marketing: an analysis of the usefulness for global companies . Munich: GRIN Verlag.

Agostini, L. and Nosella, A. (2017) ‘Interorganisational relationships in marketing: a critical review and research agenda’, International Journal of Management Reviews , 19(2), pp. 131-150.

Ahammad, M., et al . (2017) ‘Integration of non‐market and market activities in cross‐border mergers and acquisitions’, British Journal of Management, 28(4), pp. 629-648.

Arieli, S. and Sagiv, L. (2018) ‘Culture and problem-solving: congruency between the cultural mindset of individualism versus collectivism and problem type’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147(6), pp. 789–814.

Boon, C., Hartog, D. and Lepak, D (2019) ‘A systematic review of human resource management systems and their measurement’, British Journal of Management, 45(6), pp. 2498–2537.

Britnell, M. (2019) Human: solving the global workforce crisis in healthcare . Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Chowdhury, P. (2017) ‘Gender bias in education: perception of masculinity and femininity’, International Education & Research Journal , 3(5), pp. 253-255.

Chung, D. (2020) ‘General Marxism by production dimension model, production evolution and individualism-collectivism duality’, Open Journal of Social Sciences , 8(6), pp. 282-336.

Courtney, E., Goldenberg, L. and Boyd, P. (2020) ‘The contagion of mortality: a terror management health model for pandemics’ British Journal of Management, 59(3), pp. 607-617.

Cyr, D., Gefen, D. and Walczuch, R. (2017) ‘Exploring the relative impact of biological sex and masculinity–femininity values on information technology use’, Behaviour & Information Technology , 36(2), pp. 178-193.

Dumetz, J. and Cadil, J. (2018) ‘Challenging the masculinity index: the end of a cross-cultural myth’, International Journal of Social Sciences , 7(1), pp. 1-7.

Guo, Q. et al . (2018) ‘Indulgence and long term orientation influence pro-social behaviour at national level’, Frontiers in Psychology , 9(1798), pp. 1-10.

Huanga, S. and Crotts, J. (2019) ‘Relationships between Hofstede’s cultural dimensions and tourist satisfaction: a cross-country cross-sample examination’, Tourism Management , 72(1), pp. 232-241.

Jang, S. et al . (2018) ‘Societal individualism–collectivism and uncertainty avoidance as cultural moderators of relationships between job resources and strain’, Journal of Organisational Behaviour , 39(4), pp. 507-524.

Kedmenec, I. and Strašek, S. (2017) ‘Are some cultures more favourable for social entrepreneurship than others’, Journal of Economics Method , 30(1), pp. 1461-1476.

López‐Duarte, C., Vidal‐Suárez, M. and González‐Díaz, B. (2016) ‘International business and national culture: a literature review and research agenda’, International Journal of Management Reviews , 18(4), pp. 397-416.

Lu, Q. et al . (2018) ‘Cross-national variation in consumers’ retail channel selection in a multichannel environment: evidence from Asia-Pacific countries’, Journal of Business Research , 86(1), pp. 321-332.

Luria, G., Cnaan, A. and Boehm, A. (2019) ‘National culture of indulgence as predictor of pro-social behaviour: governmental effectiveness as boundary condition’, International Journal of Voluntary and Non-profit Organisations , 30(7), pp. 1164-1175.

McDuff, D., Girard, J. and Kaliouby, R. (2017) ‘Large-scale observational evidence of cross-cultural differences in facial behaviour’, Journal of Nonverbal Behaviour’ , 41(1), pp. 1-19.

Mehta, M. and Dementieva, Y. (2017) ‘The contextual specificity of gender: femininity and masculinity in college students’ same- and other-gender peer contexts’, Sex Roles, 76, pp. 604-614.

Okwir, S. et al . (2018) ‘Performance measurement and management systems: a perspective from complexity theory’, International Journal of Management Reviews , 20(3), pp. 731-754.

Ott, D. and Michailova, S. (2018) ‘Cultural intelligence: a review and new research avenues’, International Journal of Management Reviews , 20(1), pp. 99-119.

Özdaşli, K., Penez, S. and Koca, M. (2016) ‘The cultural dimension levels of Turks in the United States’, Journal of Economic Development, Management, IT, Finance and Marketing , 8(1), pp. 36-47.

Rhee, M., Alexandra, V. and Powell, S. (2020) ‘Individualism-collectivism cultural differences in performance feedback theory’, British Journal of Management, 31(1), pp. 1-18.

Savino, T., Petruzzelli, A. and Albino, V. (2017) ‘Search and recombination process to innovate: a review of the empirical evidence and a research agenda’, International Journal of Management Reviews , 19(1), pp. 54-75.

Seeck, H. (2019) ‘Ideology in management studies’, International Journal of Management Reviews , 22(1), pp. 53-74.

Shahid, A. (2017) ‘Fluids, cages and boisterous femininity: the grotesque transgression of patriarchal norms in Angela Carter’s nights at the circus’, Journal of Language and Cultural Studies , 5(2), pp. 114-122.

Shirodkar, V., Konara, P. and McGuire, S. (2017) ‘Home‐institutional imprinting and lobbying expenditure of foreign firms: moderating effects of experience and technological intensity,’ British Journal of Management, 28(4), pp. 589-608.

Singh, G., Chernikov, S. and Singh, S. (2017) ‘The inquisition of uncertainty avoidance index in the emanation of entrepreneurial development’, Journal of Entrepreneurship and Management , 6(3), pp. 81-91.

Stojcic, I., Kewen, L. and Xiaopeng, R. (2016) ‘Does uncertainty avoidance keep charity away?comparative research between charitable behavior and 79 national cultures’, Culture and Brain , 4(1), pp. 1–20.

Suryanto, T., Thaib, D. and Muliyati, M. (2019) ‘Individualism and collectivism culture to audit judgment’, International Journal of Economics & Business Administration, 7(2), pp. 26-38.

Tian, M., et al. (2018) ‘How does culture influence innovation? A systematic literature review’, International Journal of Management Reviews , 56(5), pp. 1088-1107.

Tiwari, A., Patro, A. and Shaikh, I. (2018) ‘Information communication technology-enabled platforms and P&C insurance consumption: evidence from emerging & developing economies’, Review of Economics & Finance , 15(1), pp. 81-93.

Tower, A. P., Hewett, K. and Fenik, A. P. (2019) ‘The role of cultural distance across quantiles of international joint venture longevity’, Journal of International Marketing , 27(4), 3-21.

Wang, M., Rieger, M. and Hens, T. (2017) ‘The impact of culture on loss aversion’, British Journal of Management, 30(2), pp. 270-281.

Xia, D. et al . (2019) ‘Exploring the role of cultural individualism and collectivism on public acceptance of nuclear energy’, International Journal of Economics & Business Administration, 132(1), pp. 208-215.

Yang, Y. and Merrill, C. (2017) ‘Cognitive and personality characteristics of masculinity and femininity predict way finding competence and strategies of men and women’, Sex Roles 76(1), pp. 747-758.

Yoo, S. and Lee, Y. (2019) ‘National culture and tax avoidance of multinational corporations’, Sustainability , 11(24), pp. 1-28.

Yunker, J. (2017) Think outside the country: a guide to going global and succeeding in the translation economy . London: Byte Level Books.

• Joint Ventures in Saudi Arabia: Internalization Cultural Implications
• Joint Venture Business Model
• Sony and Ericsson
• Global Marketing Plan for the Organization
• "International Marketing" by Cateora and Graham
• Mainland China’s Multinationals in International Markets
• International Capital Markets, Asset Pricing and Financing the Firm
• Origin Country Effect on Consumer Perception of Products and Brands
• Chicago (A-D)
• Chicago (N-B)

IvyPanda. (2022, June 8). Cultural Integration of Joint Ventures Factors. https://ivypanda.com/essays/cultural-integration-of-joint-ventures-factors/

"Cultural Integration of Joint Ventures Factors." IvyPanda , 8 June 2022, ivypanda.com/essays/cultural-integration-of-joint-ventures-factors/.

IvyPanda . (2022) 'Cultural Integration of Joint Ventures Factors'. 8 June.

IvyPanda . 2022. "Cultural Integration of Joint Ventures Factors." June 8, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/cultural-integration-of-joint-ventures-factors/.

1. IvyPanda . "Cultural Integration of Joint Ventures Factors." June 8, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/cultural-integration-of-joint-ventures-factors/.

Bibliography

IvyPanda . "Cultural Integration of Joint Ventures Factors." June 8, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/cultural-integration-of-joint-ventures-factors/.

An Indian Perspective On Joint Venture Agreements

Contributor.

In a world of globalization and interconnectedness, joint ventures have become an increasingly popular business model for companies looking to expand their reach and capabilities. In India, joint ventures have become a common way for foreign companies to enter the market and for local businesses to access new technologies and markets. Further, the key to success in a joint venture lies in the establishment of a solid foundation through a well-structured JV agreement. This agreement serves as a roadmap for the partnership, outlining the rights, responsibilities, and expectations of each party involved. By proactively addressing potential issues, defining clear roles, and implementing effective conflict resolution mechanisms, companies can enhance their chances of establishing a successful and sustainable partnership.

At Coinmen, our key focus is on helping business grow, whether it's an Indian company looking at geographical expansion or a foreign entity looking at Doing Business in India . Through our experience, we've learned that even during times of prosperity, differing opinions on managing valuable corporate assets, such as stock ownership, management compensation, or related party transactions can arise. Similarly, challenging business conditions may lead to parties attributing blame for performance issues, minority shareholders expressing concerns about fairness and management practices, or occasional lack of collaboration within the board. Additionally, personal goals and power dynamics among stakeholders can also contribute to misunderstandings.

By addressing each issue promptly and effectively, regardless of its origin, companies can ensure continuity and foster a positive environment where all team members feel heard and valued. Working through disagreements constructively not only preserves harmony but also contributes to building a resilient organization ready to thrive in any circumstance.

Some of the key issues that can be addressed by a good JV agreement

• Business Scope and Territory
• Clearly defining the business scope and territory in a Joint Venture Agreement (JVA) sets a strong foundation for the JV's success, creating clarity around its products, services, and operational markets. These precise definitions empower each party to pursue independent ventures beyond the established parameters confidently. They also play a crucial role in shaping an effective non-compete clause.
• This clause is designed to nurture trust by ensuring neither party engages in competitive activities within specified geographical areas or industry sectors for an agreed period. The territory delineates where these terms apply geographically, while the business definition specifies which goods and services are exclusive to the JV within that area.
• When thoughtfully defined, these elements significantly strengthen the enforceability of the non-compete clause, minimizing potential conflicts. From our experience, meticulously detailed agreements have been instrumental in preventing long-drawn disputes over non-compete breaches. By investing time upfront to clearly outline business and territorial boundaries, parties can enjoy smooth cooperation and focus on mutual growth without concerns over competitiveness disrupting their collaboration.
• Roles and Responsibilities
• Secondly, it's valuable to clearly define each partner's unique contribution in the JV based on their expertise and resources. For example, while one partner might excel in technical skills, another could shine in market-facing roles or managing operations. By specifying these roles, we ensure accountability is clear across tasks, paving the way for harmonious resolution if any issues arise. Moreover, this clarity encourages effective responsibility allocation and sets transparent expectations and objectives for everyone involved. Ultimately, this alignment fosters a collaborative spirit focused on achieving the shared goals of the JV!
• Business Plan
• A crucial element is the business plan, which should be mutually agreed upon by all parties involved in the Joint Venture Agreement (JVA). This business plan serves as an exciting strategic roadmap to JV success, offering partners a key guiding tool for making effective decisions. It ensures that everyone's interests remain aligned with the JV's goals. Furthermore, this comprehensive plan outlines performance benchmarks at measurable levels, empowering partners to foresee potential challenges and address them through the JVA and operational strategies.
• Even with clearly defined partner roles, the success of any plan ultimately rests on the individuals appointed to the Board representing those partners. While diverse interests and perspectives can lead to occasional deadlocks, this is a natural part of collaboration. Therefore, having a robust deadlock resolution mechanism in your Joint Venture Agreement (JVA) becomes crucial. These mechanisms could include enlisting experts for technical issues or engaging neutral parties to facilitate negotiations— perhaps even mediators or arbitrators. In extreme cases, your JVA might offer options for partners to exit or seek an exit from the joint venture if one desires to continue independently. This proactive approach ensures that challenges become stepping stones rather than roadblocks on your journey together.
• Funding Roadmap
• Another aspect to navigate is the provision of additional funding when the business requires it. While all partners might not always have the capacity to participate proportionately in a new funding round, this could lead to changes in shareholding patterns, sometimes significantly. Therefore, it's wise for partners to outline a clear process for making additional funding contributions.
• A great approach is to prioritize raising third-party or related-party debt (perhaps with certain limits on amount or tenure) at an interest rate set at arm's length, which can even be benchmarked within the Joint Venture Agreement (JVA). If these debt options are fully explored and deemed unsuitable, then seeking equity investment becomes the next step. To keep any potential disputes regarding equity dilution at bay, parties should consider establishing a valuation mechanism right from the start. This will ensure absolute clarity about the company's valuation later down the line. While legal issues are sometimes inevitable in JV scenarios and pursuing them through Indian courts can indeed be time-consuming and demanding, there are proactive strategies available. For instance, including provisions for alternative remedies like stake sale/purchase at pre-agreed formulae prices can be incredibly advantageous. This approach especially benefits smaller JVs where litigation costs might surpass asset values involved. This forward-thinking strategy helps both parties navigate potential conflict with clarity and confidence.
• Employment and Talent
• Joint ventures between foreign and Indian partners are often formed to harness the exceptional technical expertise of the foreign partner. This provides a wonderful opportunity for collaboration, where expatriates from abroad bring their invaluable skills to the Indian JV. These expatriates, while offering immense value, come with associated costs such as salaries, social security contributions, and taxes. To ensure smooth operations and mutual benefit, it's ideal for both partners to agree on which expatriates will join the JV team. Having a clear understanding of all involved costs, including tax parity, and setting responsibilities and performance metrics can pave the way for success. To further foster clarity and harmony in working relationships, parties might also consider signing employment agreements with key employees. This proactive approach sets a positive foundation for success and helps avoid any potential confusion down the line.

In summary, the success of a joint venture in India holds tremendous promise when backed by a meticulously crafted JV agreement. By proactively addressing potential challenges, clearly defining roles and responsibilities, and incorporating effective conflict resolution mechanisms, companies significantly boost their chances of forming a prosperous and enduring partnership. Investing time and effort into developing a thorough joint venture agreement is not only wise but can pave the way for substantial long-term savings in both time and money.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Corporate/Commercial Law

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.