[Framework developed in Australia]
Note . a For studies where the types of participants are specified as primary care providers- Characteristics of women - column of the table refers to women to whom primary care providers delivered family violence–related care.
b Quality assessed using CCAT.
c Quality assessed using AACODS.
We divided the CCAT score into three categories: high (31–40), moderate (21–30) and low quality (< 21). Most studies were moderate ( n = 13) or high quality ( n = 13) and then low ( n = 2). We only included moderate quality or high quality studies in our synthesis. All the grey literature met all the AACODS criteria and therefore, was considered high quality. This could be because the sources for grey literature were highly reputed organisations and world-renowned family violence research experts.
We generated eleven components that demonstrated culturally competent family violence practice at the provider level (four components) and at the whole of practice level (seven components). Please refer to Figure 3 .
A culturally competent primary care family violence response model.
Awareness of one’s biases and assumptions.
Primary care providers can become aware of their own biases and assumptions by first, understanding the privileged position that comes from majority race membership or a higher socioeconomic status (if they so do) ( Campbell & Campbell, 1996 ; Walker et al., 2014 ). And second, by suspending assumptions about culturally diverse women based on their economic status, educational background, immigration status or ethnic background ( Banks, 2015 ; Briones-Vozmediano et al., 2018 ; Campbell & Campbell, 1996 ; Migrant & Refugee Women’s Health Partnership, 2019 ). For example, selectively screening women for signs of family violence based on a woman’s socio-demographic background or consciously deferring screening in fear of offending her culture ( Campbell & Campbell, 1996 ; Puri, 2005 ).
Awareness of one’s cultural competence can be further enhanced through self-auditing, a process that requires critical self-reflection ( Walker et al., 2014 ). Walker et al. (2014) have adopted the ‘ASKED’ (Awareness, Skill, Knowledge, Encounters and Desire) mnemonic, originally proposed by Campinha-Bacote (2002) to the context of working with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander and culturally diverse people. This mnemonic can be adapted by primary care providers to reflect on family violence practice (refer to Table 2 ). In addition, engaging in self-reflective practice in whatever way possible could also be beneficial ( Clarke & Boyle, 2014 ).
Self-Cultural Competency Assessment.
: Am I aware of culturally appropriate and inappropriate actions and attitudes while working with Indigenous women and women of immigrant and refugee. |
backgrounds experiencing family violence? Does my behaviour or attitudes on family violence reflect a prejudice, bias, or stereotypical mindset? |
: Do I have the skill to develop and assess my level of cultural competence? What practical experience do I have of family violence? |
: Do I have knowledge of cultural practices, protocols, beliefs, etc. related to family violence? Have I undertaken any cultural development programme that informs me of family violence experiences of Indigenous women and women of immigrant and refugee backgrounds? |
: Do I interact with Indigenous women experiencing family violence? Do I interact with women of immigrant and refugee backgrounds experiencing family violence? Have I worked alongside Indigenous and women of immigrant and refugee backgrounds experiencing family violence? Have I consulted with Indigenous people or culturally and linguistically diverse groups? |
: Do I really want to become culturally competent? What is my motivation? |
(Walker et al., 2014, p. 213). |
Understanding expectations, cultural values and beliefs of culturally diverse women was the most common component discussed in review studies. A willingness to understand, and preferably to have knowledge of, women’s cultural beliefs, family values and expectations of care is important to providing culturally competent responses ( Aguilar, 2011 ; Alvarez et al., 2018 ; Ashbourne & Baobaid, 2019 ; Briones-Vozmediano et al., 2019 ; Centre for Culture Ethnicity and Health, 2012 ; Choahan, 2018 ; Joe et al., 2020 ; Migrant & Refugee Women’s Health Partnership, 2019 ; Spangaro et al., 2019 ; Walker et al., 2014 ). Studies of US Arab and Iranian immigrant women reported their discontent with the healthcare system’s lack of family-centred responses ( Ashbourne & Baobaid, 2019 ; Nikparvar, 2019 ).
Women of immigrant and refugee backgrounds experiencing family violence face multiple interrelated barriers to care and silencing about their family violence experiences. Health visitors working with Pakistani immigrant women in northern England reported that women were usually accompanied to primary care centres by a family member, requiring conscious efforts to set up a private consultation session with them ( Smyth, 2016 ). Another study of Latina women in the USA found that they experienced challenges such as language barriers, displacement-related trauma, trauma from living in violent communities, separation from family members and a fear of confidentiality breaches when interpreters were from the same community as the women ( Alvarez et al., 2018 ).
Although we found intra-ethnic variations between women’s preferences for their care provider’s gender and ethnic backgrounds, two expectations commonly expressed by women were respect for and genuine interest in their culture ( Aguilar, 2011 ). Knowledge about women’s cultural values, beliefs and expectations can be obtained through interactions with women from various ethnic backgrounds, expressing interest in women’s culture and paying attention to how they describe their family violence situations ( Campbell & Campbell, 1996 ; Mehra, 2004 ). Learning from colleagues with experience of interacting with diverse women could be a helpful strategy ( Smyth, 2016 ).
Continual efforts by primary care providers are necessary to demonstrate inclusive values to culturally diverse women. Awareness of one’s biases and assumptions should be followed by an active commitment to strive against any oppression and racism women face ( Campbell & Campbell, 1996 ). A continual effort towards learning what culturally diverse women find demeaning, and that a woman from an ethnic minority could fear that a clinician from a majority ethnic background could stigmatise her if she discloses family violence is essential ( Campbell & Campbell, 1996 ). Expressing genuine interest in women’s culture is helpful, and this could be communicated by asking women about their background and establishing some sort of common ground ( Aguilar, 2011 ). Questions about women’s immigration status should be best left for the end to avoid alarm since some women may not be legal residents, while others could be concerned about the effects of disclosure on their immigration status ( Mehra, 2004 ). Overall, the aim of primary care providers should be to build trust and create a culturally safe climate to promote disclosure of family violence ( Smyth, 2016 ).
Efficiency in care delivery means that when a woman from an immigrant or refugee background or an Indigenous woman seeks family violence support from their primary care providers, the care providers neither feel unprepared nor frustrated; rather, they are knowledgeable and skillful in how to best support the women.
One of the important strategies to achieve efficiency, frequently discussed in the grey literature, was training on access to and use of interpreters ( Australia’s National Research Organisation for Women’s Safety, 2019 ; Kalapac, 2016 ; Migrant & Refugee Women’s Health Partnership, 2019 ). There could be medico-legal risks if primary care providers fail to either access an interpreter or recognise the need for one (Migrant and Refugee Women’s Health Partnership, 2019b). Several strategies such as timely organisation of an interpreting service, using a pseudonym for the woman, being aware of the woman’s non-verbal cues, creating a code word for safety and avoiding using interpreters from the woman’s community by accessing interstate interpreters would enable safe and efficient use of interpreters ( Choahan, 2018 ; Migrant & Refugee Women’s Health Partnership, 2019 ; The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners, 2014 ).
During clinical assessment of culturally diverse women, primary care providers would benefit from the awareness that women from various backgrounds could intimate about their experiences of family violence differently. A study in Zimbabwe revealed that midwives often discover family violence when enquiring about women’s use of contraception or when uncovering family neglect of pregnant women ( Shamu et al., 2013 ). A US study of Spanish speaking Latina women revealed that two screening questions were more sensitive and specific to identify experiences of intimate partner violence among these women: questions about feeling controlled by their partner and/or on feeling lonely in the relationship ( Wrangle et al., 2008 , p. 265). While screening for family violence, if the primary care provider senses that the woman is hesitant to disclose, asking her in a subsequent visit could be an important strategy ( Alvarez et al., 2018 ; Garnweidner-Holme et al., 2017 ). Similarly, risk assessment instruments, if available, specific to women from immigrant or refugee backgrounds or Indigenous women would be beneficial, because their vulnerabilities are unique compared to the non-diverse population ( Messing et al., 2013 ; Wrangle et al., 2008 ).
Safety planning and referral of women experiencing family violence was the least discussed component. The only study that discussed safety planning for culturally diverse women suggested educating immigrant women on the laws and resources of the new country, providing culturally appropriate accommodation (e.g. those that accommodate children and provide culturally appropriate food), providing English language classes and linking women to support groups and networks ( Sabri et al., 2018b ). Some women even expressed the need to educate the abuser on how to respect women ( Sabri et al., 2018b ). Referral of culturally diverse women, discussed by a single report, should include linking the women to ethno-specific agencies, if possible ( Centre for Culture Ethnicity and Health, 2012c ).
At this level, seven sub-themes were identified: cultural competency assessment, policy, budget, data recording, physical setting, multicultural service and training (refer to Figure 3 ).
Walker et al. (2014 , pp. 214–215) propose critically reflective questions to understand an organisation’s cultural competence in service delivery to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander persons or groups. These questions can be adapted by primary care practices to the working context of family violence and culturally diverse women (refer to Table 3 ).
Organisational Cultural Competency Assessment.
Does the primary care practice environment promote and foster a culturally friendly environment? |
Is it located in an area where Indigenous persons and persons of immigrant and refugee backgrounds may wish to access services? |
Do the primary care providers display attitudes and behaviours that demonstrate respect for all cultural groups? |
Does the primary care practice involve or collaborate with Indigenous persons or groups or persons/groups of immigrant and refugee backgrounds when planning events, programmes, service delivery and organisational development activities? |
Does the practice develop policies and procedures that take cultural matters into consideration? |
Does the primary care practice provide programmes that encourage participation by Indigenous persons and persons of immigrant and refugee backgrounds? |
Does the primary care practice use culturally friendly mediums to communicate about family violence? |
Does the practice have knowledge of local Indigenous and immigrant and refugee groups, protocols of local groups, protocols for communicating with groups including persons of immigrant and refugee backgrounds, and have a strategy for active engagement local culturally diverse groups? |
Does the practice develop and/or implement a collaborative service delivery model with other family violence support organisations that are relevant to the specific cultural needs of the clients? |
(Walker et al., 2014, p. 212-214) |
The findings from grey literature showed that policies, procedures and information should be in place to allow primary care providers to efficiently support culturally diverse women and refer them to appropriate support agencies ( Centre for Culture Ethnicity and Health, 2012e ). Organisational policy on use of interpreters, culturally competent activities, recruitment of diverse workers, and staff development and organisational investment in infrastructures (e.g. speaker phones) that enable efficient access to interpreters has been suggested ( Centre for Culture Ethnicity and Health, 2012b ). At the governance level, involvement of multicultural workers that represent the local ethnic diversity in policy development, and planning and monitoring committees could also be an important strategy to increase organisational cultural competence ( Centre for Culture Ethnicity and Health, 2012b ; 2012e ).
The grey literature recommended that budget allocation to training, infrastructures and other cultural competence activities would enhance cultural competence of an organisation ( Centre for Culture Ethnicity and Health, 2012d )
Physical settings of primary care practices could reflect culturally welcoming environment through visual images and posters in multiple languages that reflect the diversity of their patient population ( Centre for Culture Ethnicity and Health, 2012c ; Mehra, 2004 ). Family violence brochures in multiple languages for women of all literacy levels should be made available ( Alvarez et al., 2018 ; Mehra, 2004 ).
At the primary care practice level, data recording of clinical assessments of culturally diverse women could include the following: (a) Women’s preference of care provider’s gender and ethnic background ( Immigrant Women’s Domestic Violence Service, 2006 ; Smyth, 2016 ); (b) women’s languages spoken, literacy levels in their first language and in English and need for an interpreter ( Centre for Culture Ethnicity and Health, 2012a ); (c) family composition, familial support, if cultural beliefs are individual centred or familycentred, community origin (small/emerging), length of time resident in the new country and their current community, and sense of support or belonging to their community ( Ashbourne & Baobaid, 2019 ); and (d) immigration status (permanent residency/temporary residency; visa dependency status; refugee and humanitarian visa) ( Ashbourne & Baobaid, 2019 ; Kalapac, 2016 ).
Employing workers from locally representative ethnic backgrounds could create a culturally safe environment and can provide an insight into how patients from differing cultural backgrounds express themselves and the rituals or traditions they follow ( Briones-Vozmediano et al., 2019 ; Centre for Culture Ethnicity and Health, 2012 )). Consulting with specialist organisations that work with culturally diverse women could be an important strategy ( Northwest Metropolitan Primary Care Partnership, 2016 ).
Training primary care providers in cross-cultural communication, entry and use of the data recorded at the organisational level (refer to data recording) and use of interpreters has been suggested ( Australia’s National Research Organisation for Women’s Safety, 2019 , Centre for Culture Ethnicity and Health, 2012 , Centre for Culture Ethnicity and Health, 2012f ; Migrant & Refugee Women’s Health Partnership, 2019 ). For example, primary care practices can use routine recorded data to assess the local cultural diversity, plan multicultural recruitment, develop information materials, and set up interpreters based on the ethnicity and language spoken by the local population.
Overall, our findings showed that culturally competent primary care can be delivered to culturally diverse women through a combination of efforts from primary care settings and the primary care providers.
This unique study has for the first-time explored components of a specific culturally competent family violence related primary care response. We generated two main themes: components of cultural competency at the primary care provider level, and at the primary care practice level. In this section, we use an ecological lens to interpret our findings. The ecological model propounded by Bronfenbrenner (1979) was originally proposed to study the interrelationship between a developing child and the constituents of their environment. Since then, the model has been widely adopted and applied to study a range of phenomena, including the healthcare response to family violence ( Colombini et al., 2012 ; García-Moreno et al., 2015 ; World Health Organisation, 2017 ). Adding a cultural competency lens to these best practice models, we have proposed a model of care that posits women at the centre and nests components at primary care provider level within those at the primary care practice level ( Figure 3 ).
The components identified at the primary care practice level (cultural competency assessment, policy, training, budget, physical setting, data recording and multicultural service) are consistent with the findings from other studies that have focused on healthcare system responses to family violence ( Colombini et al., 2012 ; Goicolea et al., 2013 ). A manual released by the World Health Organisation (2017) for health managers recommended that formulating policy frameworks, collecting data to strengthen advocacy and implement accountability, strengthening health workforce, increasing available infrastructures and improving the overall service delivery are important building blocks for designing and planning health system’s response to family violence.
However, this global best practice model lacks a discussion on how these elements can be applied to culturally diverse women who experience additional issues such as systemic racism, language barriers and cultural beliefs that promote silencing about family violence ( World Health Organisation 2017 ). Another study conducted in Spain with middle level managers showed that, although, policy level changes are critical to integrate family violence response into the healthcare system, stakeholders are the ultimate drivers for sustainable integration ( Briones-Vozmediano et al., 2018 ).
Although our review discussed the elements at the primary care practice level, there was scant discussion of how sustainable culturally competent family violence responses can be integrated into the primary care system. A review conducted as a part of a larger study on family violence done across antenatal care settings in Australia recommended that auditing hospital systems is an important step towards understanding sustainability ( Hegarty et al., 2020 ). In this study, similar to our review findings, patient demographics such as country of birth, language spoken, need for an interpreter and referral to an Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander services were the report fields used for the audit. A lack of explicit discussion on sustainability in our review could be attributed to the fragmented focus of the included studies on different elements of the healthcare system, as sustainability is an ongoing process that requires interaction between those elements ( Gear et al., 2018 ). In addition, research designs of studies that explore healthcare response to family violence have been reported to have limited or no discussion on sustainability ( Gear et al., 2018 ). Our review did not include studies that discussed national family violence laws, and policies with a cultural competency lens – highlighting the need for further research in this area ( Table 4 ).
Implications for Practice, Policy and Research.
Implications for policy | Our findings can be used by policymakers to get an insight into the components that need to be integrated an organisational level that enable culturally competent system of primary care. The model can be adopted by umbrella organisations that represent primary care providers such as doctors, nurses and social workers to develop guidelines on responding to culturally diverse women experiencing family violence. |
Implications for practice | The model can be used by primary care practice to reflect on its current level of cultural competence, design training programmes and to provide a quick visual guide to its practitioners. Also, this review can be a great resource for primary care providers keen to learn time-efficiently about working with culturally diverse women experiencing family violence. |
Implications for research | This study adds knowledge to an area with a significant gap. In addition, we have identified areas that need further research: (a) Examination of how the components of the proposed model interacts with elements at the national policy level; (b) development and validation of risk assessment instruments for women from various immigrant and refugee backgrounds, and Indigenous women, and LGBTQIA+ identifying women from culturally diverse backgrounds; (c) safety planning specific to women from culturally diverse backgrounds and (d) application of the proposed model to women from various ethnic and racial backgrounds. |
At the primary care provider level, the majority of studies discussed the importance of knowledge about and the willingness to understand culturally diverse women’s beliefs and practices, especially those relevant to family values, and broader communal views on family violence. This is in contrast to the findings reported by a qualitative meta-analysis on women’s expectations from their healthcare providers – where the major theme was kindness and care ( Tarzia et al., 2020 ). This could be attributed to the addition of a cultural competency lens in our review, whereby women repeatedly expressed a need to feel understood – for example, immigrant women wanted to know how the disclosure would affect their visa status, whereas Indigenous women felt that non-Indigenous care providers are in a rush to complete the consultation, rather than going beyond the required policies and procedures to really understand them. In our review, an expectation shared by Arab women and Pakistani women was a need for family-centred family violence responses, especially for families that go through an involuntary migration process. This could be because the refugee experience is often characterised by trauma and torture, and exposure to everyday violence, loss of family members, rape as a weapon of war, and mental health issues – the factors contributing to family violence ( Guruge et al., 2010 ; Vaughan et al., 2016 ). Further research is warranted on how or if family-centred responses can be delivered as an early intervention for families of refugee backgrounds, and other families from collectivist backgrounds.
Our review proposed a consensus based culturally competent model of primary care response to family violence. Previous studies that have examined primary care response to non-diverse populations have focused on the training needs of primary care providers, especially on recognising experiences of abuse, providing safe space for disclosure, delivering trauma-informed care and self-care ( Coles et al., 2013 ; Decker et al., 2017 ; Hooker et al., 2021 ; Sohal et al., 2020 ). However, these studies do not provide an insight into how these elements interact with women’s ethnicity and their cultural backgrounds. Within and beyond the context of family violence, the expectation that primary care providers should be knowledgeable about women’s culture and beliefs is sometimes reported as challenging and overwhelming due to the vast diversities of the patient population and the resulting variances in needs ( Zeh et al., 2018 ). As a result, discourse on a combination of cultural humility and cultural competence has been suggested ( Campinha-Bacote, 2019 ). On one hand, although a popular concept, cultural competence has often been criticised for quantifying attitudes and skills required to work in a culturally diverse context and undermining its fluidity, cultivating an expectation that competence can be gained in someone else’s culture ( Danso, 2018 ; Dean, 2001 ; Greene-Moton & Minkler, 2020 ). Cultural humility, on the other hand, promotes self-critique, lifelong learning commitment and challenges organisational power differentials ( Danso, 2018 ; Murray-Garcia & Tervalon, 1998 ). Our review findings build on the concept of cultural competence, while including cultural humility as a sub-construct. The critical self-reflective questions that we have proposed ( Tables 2 and and3) 3 ) lean towards cultural humility, but the overall model is still situated within a cultural competence paradigm.
A major strength of our review is the breadth of our inclusion criteria. We have included all studies regardless of the study design used and have also included grey literature items. In addition, we have included studies that focus on women, primary care providers, protocols and guidelines of care. This has resulted in a comprehensive examination into the concept of cultural competency in the primary care context of family violence. Although we have used the CIS method, we have appraised the quality of the studies, providing readers an insight into the strength of the evidence. We move beyond mere aggregation of our findings to critical interpretation to generate a model of care. The principles that we discuss could be applicable beyond the primary care context of family violence.
Our review has several limitations. Missing findings on how national elements such as immigration laws, child protection and national family violence policies, and guidelines interact with our findings at primary care provider and practice level limit the application of our study. This could be a focus of future research. Another challenge was integrating findings from sources varied in design, methods and outcomes. To overcome this, we focused on conceptual data analysis to identify key concepts, through multiple reads and examination from multiple perspectives. Since there was no grey literature found that focused on all three concepts (family violence, primary care, and cultural competency), we included studies that focused on at least two of the three concepts. However, we appraised the quality of the grey literature and compared the findings generated from the grey items with those generated from primary studies to identify any notable differences ( Figure 1 ). Although we used the term gender-based violence as a search phrase, we acknowledge that the search terms may not have been sensitive to include studies that focused on nonbinary and two-spirit people. Next, we acknowledge that the proposed model could be broad/too general to offer in-depth guidance to primary care providers interacting with women with complex needs that were not touched on by this review (e.g. women living with disabilities, substance use disorder, etc.). Each element of the proposed model and how it can be applied to the primary care context of women who belong to a particular ethnicity or race deserves further research.
Responding to women experiencing family violence has been perceived as challenging by primary care providers, and cultural diversity adds a layer of complexity that could be a barrier to care provision. However, as society becomes global and the movement of people between countries more common, addressing this barrier becomes more critical. Our review aimed to address the meaning of cultural competency in the family violence primary care context. We identified eleven components that can be adopted by the whole of primary care practice and its care providers. The ecological model that we have proposed, with further research into each of the components, has a potential to create a culturally safe primary care environment, where culturally diverse women can access care, disclose their experiences of family violence and receive care that meets their needs and expectations.
Acknowledgements and credits.
We would acknowledge the help provided by Ange-Johns Hayden, Senior Research Advisor at La Trobe University, during the literature search process. Many Thanks to Mr Sandesh Pantha for his help with the title, abstract and full text screening.
Bijaya Pokharel (MN BScN) is a Registered Nurse and PhD candidate at the Judith Lumley Centre, La Trobe University. Her PhD focuses on process evaluation of a whole of general practice intervention that aims to improve culturally safe responses to women of immigrant and refugee backgrounds experiencing family violence. Her research interests are family violence, cultural competency, primary care, community health nursing, systematic reviews and qualitative research.
Angela Taft is Professor and Principal Research Fellow at the Judith Lumley Centre (JLC), La Trobe University, Australia and an Honorary Senior Fellow in the Department of General Practice, University of Melbourne. She is a social scientist using rigorous combinations of qualitative and epidemiological methods to answer urgent and complex questions about women’s health.
A/Professor Jane Yelland is a Senior Research Fellow and Co-Leader of the Refugee and Migrant Research Program within the Intergenerational Health research group at Murdoch Children’s Research Institute. She is Honorary Principal Fellow at The University of Melbourne, Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care Academic Centre. Her team works in partnership with refugee and migrant communities, clinicians and policy makers in the co-design of equity focussed health service reforms.
Dr. Leesa Hooker is a nurse/midwife academic and Senior Research Fellow at the Judith Lumley Centre-La Trobe University, leading the Child, Family and Community Health nursing research stream within the Centre. She has established expertise in the epidemiology of family violence, women’s mental and reproductive health and parenting.
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding: The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This study was supported by NHMRC Partnerships in Health Grant No.1134477. Bijaya Pokharel is supported by the La Trobe University Postgraduate Research Scholarship and the La Trobe University Full Fee Research Scholarship.
Supplemental Material: Supplemental material for this article is available online.
Join us in urging your Members of Congress to act now and prevent catastrophic cuts to th [Read More]
Domestic violence is a pattern of coercive, controlling behavior that can include physical abuse, emotional or psychological abuse, sexual abuse or financial abuse (using money and financial tools to exert control). Some abusers are able to exert complete control over a victim’s every action without ever using violence or only using subtle threats of violence. All types of abuse are devastating to victims.
Domestic violence is a pervasive, life-threatening crime that affects millions of individuals across the United States regardless of age, economic status, race, sexual orientation, gender identity, religion, ability, or education level.
High-profile cases of domestic violence will attract headlines, but thousands of people experience domestic abuse every day. They come from all walks of life. In our annual Domestic Violence Counts Report , the National Network to End Domestic Violence (NNEDV) finds that U.S. domestic violence shelters and programs serve thousands of victims and answer thousands of crisis hotline calls, chats, texts, and emails every day of the year.
Abusive partners make it very difficult for victims to escape relationships. Sadly, many survivors suffer from abuse for decades.
It is important for survivors to know that the abuse is not their fault, and that they are not alone. Help is available to those who are experiencing domestic violence.
Survivors have many options, from obtaining a protection order to staying in a shelter, exploring options through support group, or making an anonymous call to a local domestic violence shelter or national hotline. There is hope for victims, and they are not alone.
There are hundreds of local shelters across the United States that provide safety, counseling, legal help, and other resources for victims and their children.
Information and support are available for victims of abuse and their friends and family:
TIP: Before using online resources, know that your computer or phone may not be safe. Some abusive partners misuse technology to stalk and track a partner’s activities on a computer, tablet, or mobile device. (Learn more at TechSafety.org .)
The question is not “ Why doesn’t the victim just leave?” The better question is “ Why does the abuser choose to abuse? ”
The deck is stacked against victims as they navigate safety:
There is no way to spot an abuser in a crowd, but most abusers share some common characteristics. Some of the subtle warning signs include:
It’s important to remember that domestic violence is first and foremost a pattern of power and control. Any one of these behaviors may not be indicative of abuse on its own, until it is considered as part of a pattern of behavior.
Yes, but they must first make the choice to change their behavior. It’s not easy for an abusive partner to stop choosing abusive behavior, and it requires a serious commitment to change. Once an abuser has had all of the power in a relationship, it’s difficult to transition to a healthy relationship where each partner has equal respect and power.
Sometimes an abusive partner stops one form of the abuse – for example, the physical violence – but continues to employ other forms of abuse – such as emotional, sexual, or financial abuse. It is important to remember that domestic violence includes one or more forms of abuse and is a part of an overall pattern of seeking power and control over the victim.
Yes, men can be victims of domestic abuse. Domestic violence is a pervasive, life-threatening crime that affects millions of individuals across the United States regardless of age, economic status, race, sexual orientation, gender identity, religion, ability, or education level.
According to data collected from 2003 to 2012, 82 percent of domestic, dating, and sexual violence was committed against women, and 18 percent against men [1]. A 2012 study found that about 4 in 5 victims of domestic, dating, and sexual violence between 1994 and 2010 were women [2].
Pervasive stereotypes that men are always the abuser and women are always the victim discriminates against survivors who are men and discourages them from coming forward with their stories. Survivors of domestic violence who are men are less likely to seek help or report abuse. Many are unaware of services for men, and there is a common misconception that domestic violence programs only serve women.
When we talk about domestic violence, we’re not talking about men versus women or women versus men. We’re talking about violence versus peace and control versus respect. Domestic violence affects us all, and all of us – women, children, and men – must be part of the solution.
Yes, LGBTQ people can be victims of domestic abuse. Domestic violence is a pervasive, life-threatening crime that affects millions of individuals across the United States regardless of age, economic status, race, sexual orientation, gender identity, religion, ability, or education level.
At some point in their lives, 43.8% lesbian women and 61.1% of bisexual women have experienced rape, physical violence, and/or stalking by an intimate partner, as opposed to 35% of heterosexual women [3].
Twenty-six percent of gay men and 37.3% of bisexual men have experienced rape, physical violence, and/or stalking by an intimate partner in their lifetime, in comparison to 29% of heterosexual men [4].
A 2016 report found that more than half (54%) of transgender individuals have experienced intimate partner violence. A 2015 study found that 22% of transgender respondents had been harassed by law enforcement, 6% were physically assaulted, and 46% felt uncomfortable seeking police assistance.
A bad economy does not cause domestic violence, but it can make it worse. The severity and frequency of abuse can increase when factors associated with a bad economy are present. Job loss, housing foreclosures, debt, and other factors contribute to higher stress levels at home, which can lead to increased violence.
As the abuse gets worse, a weak economy limits options for survivors to seek safety or escape. Additionally, domestic violence shelters and programs may experience funding cuts right when they need more staff and funding to keep up with the demand for their services. Victims may also have a more difficult time finding a job to become financially independent of abusers.
Everyone can speak out against domestic violence. Use our “10 Tips to Have Informed Conversation about Domestic Violence” to help guide your conversations with friends, colleagues, and loved ones.
Every person can take individual action to create a supportive community for survivors. Get involved in your community – we’ve got ideas for creative ways to get involved in our Get Involved Toolkit .
Members of the public can donate to local, statewide, or national anti-domestic violence programs or victim assistance programs, like NNEDV . Find your state or territory coalition here .
You can call on your public officials to support life-saving domestic violence services and hold perpetrators accountable. Learn more, or take action here .
[1] Catalano, S., U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics. Special Report: Intimate Partner Violence, 1998-2010. (Nov. 2012, revised Sep. 2015)
[2] Tjaden, P., and Thoennes, N., U.S. Department of Justice. Extent, Nature, and Consequences of Intimate Partner Violence. (July 2000).
[3] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey: 2010 Findings on Victimization by Sexual Orientation,” 2013.
[4] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey: 2010 Findings on Victimization by Sexual Orientation,” 2013.
🏆 best essay topics on domestic violence, ✍️ domestic violence essay topics for college, 👍 good domestic violence research topics & essay examples, 🌶️ hot domestic violence ideas to write about, 🎓 most interesting domestic violence research titles, ❓ domestic violence research questions.
Cite this post
StudyCorgi. (2021, September 9). 160 Domestic Violence Essay Topics. https://studycorgi.com/ideas/domestic-violence-essay-topics/
"160 Domestic Violence Essay Topics." StudyCorgi , 9 Sept. 2021, studycorgi.com/ideas/domestic-violence-essay-topics/.
StudyCorgi . (2021) '160 Domestic Violence Essay Topics'. 9 September.
1. StudyCorgi . "160 Domestic Violence Essay Topics." September 9, 2021. https://studycorgi.com/ideas/domestic-violence-essay-topics/.
Bibliography
StudyCorgi . "160 Domestic Violence Essay Topics." September 9, 2021. https://studycorgi.com/ideas/domestic-violence-essay-topics/.
StudyCorgi . 2021. "160 Domestic Violence Essay Topics." September 9, 2021. https://studycorgi.com/ideas/domestic-violence-essay-topics/.
These essay examples and topics on Domestic Violence were carefully selected by the StudyCorgi editorial team. They meet our highest standards in terms of grammar, punctuation, style, and fact accuracy. Please ensure you properly reference the materials if you’re using them to write your assignment.
This essay topic collection was updated on June 21, 2024 .
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
4 answers. May 13, 2022. Corporal punishment, violent communication, humiliation...by parents and teachers. Relevant answer. Charlotte Kamel. Nov 21, 2022. Answer. Violence towards children never ...
1. Introduction. Intimate partner violence is a pervasive global issue, particularly affecting women. According to the World Health Organization (), approximately 30% of women worldwide have experienced violence from their intimate partners.Disturbingly, recent studies indicate that circumstances such as the COVID-19 pandemic, which disrupt daily lives on a global scale, have exacerbated ...
The Violence against Women Act (VAWA) of 1994 helped pave domestic violence concerns into legislative matters. Historically, family violence was handled through informal measures often resulting in mishandling of cases. Through VAWA, victims were given the opportunity to have their cases legally remedied.
The Domestic Violence Evidence Project (DVEP) is a multi-faceted, multi-year and highly collaborative effort designed to assist state coalitions, local domestic violence programs, researchers, and other allied individuals and organizations better respond to the growing emphasis on identifying and integrating evidence-based practice into their work. . DVEP brings together research, evaluation ...
Family violence scholars from the United States, Canada and the U.K. were invited to conduct an extensive and thorough review of the empirical literature, in 17 broad topic areas. They were asked to conduct a formal search for published, peer-reviewed studies through standard, widely-used search programs, and then catalogue and summarize all ...
Internationally, family violence is recognized as a major social and public health issue with a significant economic burden. Most recent estimates of the global cost of violence against women alone were approximately US$1.5 trillion in 2016, with the true cost likely to be significantly higher in 2023 given inflation and increases in prevalence during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19 ...
Most domestic and family violence resource development, research, education, and training focus on formal responders such as specialist domestic, family, and sexualized violence services and statutory and law enforcement services. ... The research questions also aimed to explore how the social responses from Insight Exchange were experienced by ...
A CBPR Toolkit For Domestic Violence Researchers. This toolkit is for researchers across disciplines and social locations who are working in academic, policy, community, or practice-based settings. In particular, the toolkit provides support to emerging researchers as they consider whether and how to take a CBPR approach and what it might mean ...
Action Item Number 1: Provide Training for All Family Violence Practitioners. Almost all of the practitioners (88.2%) reported that they believed training or workshops that teach how to evaluate, understand, or apply research would result in a large increase of application in research to practice.
About Domestic Violence. Domestic violence describes abuse perpetrated by one partner against another in the context of an interpersonal relationship. Domestic violence can be committed by current or former partners. The alternate term intimate partner violence has gained favor in the twenty-first century, as it expands the definition to ...
In this section, we list the research questions identified for the third phase of the SAF-T study. We then provide an overview of the multi-method approach used to address these research questions and to develop the family/friends theoretical framework. 2.1 Research Questions . With input from ACF, The Hotline, and the SAF-T Project expert panel, 8
Family and domestic violence including child abuse, intimate partner abuse, and elder abuse is a common problem in the United States. Family and domestic health violence are estimated to affect 10 million people in the United States every year. It is a national public health problem, and virtually all healthcare professionals will at some point evaluate or treat a patient who is a victim of ...
The lifetime prevalence of physical violence by an intimate partner was an estimated 31.5% among women and in the 12 months before taking the survey, an estimated 4.0% of women experienced some form of physical violence by an intimate partner. An estimated 22.3% of women experienced at least one act of severe physical violence by an intimate ...
In the questionnaire, questions 1-10, 11-36, 37-65 and 66-71 related to sociodemographic information, types of spousal abuse (psychological, economical, physical and sexual violence), patriarchal beliefs and traditions and family upbringing and learning violence, respectively.
Jan 4, 2024. Answer. Domestic violence is a complex phenomenon that needs to be viewed from multiple perspectives. Previously, I participated in the study of such a phenomenon as "prevention of ...
the only desirable outcome for family violence (Hamby, 2014). Nonetheless, physical separation to promote safety remains a pri-mary goal of many family violence services. Existing data provide little insight into which specific interventions are associated with a greater likelihood of separation. Purpose and Research Questions
The correlation of HITS and CTS scores was .85. For phase two, the mean HITS scores for office patients and abuse victims were 6.13 and 15.15, respectively. Optimal data analysis revealed that a cut score of 10.5 on the HITS reliably differentiated respondents in the two groups. Using this cut score, 91% of patients and 96% of abuse victims ...
Research on Violence Against Women and Family Violence: The Challenges and the Promise A Broadening Agenda The national agenda to end violence against women is impressively broad. It encompasses rigorous scientific research projects, model intervention programs, and creative policy changes.
Family violence includes acts of physical, sexual and psychological violence, and forms of controlling behaviours directed against a family member (Victorian Current Acts, 2008).When such acts of abuse are perpetrated by an intimate partner, it is termed 'intimate partner violence' (Devries et al., 2013, p. 1527).In our study, we define family violence as any abusive or controlling ...
hould be considered exposure to violence and abuse, in part because it is so common. In many cases, hitti. g among young children and siblings evokes considerable pain, fear, and humiliation. In terms of harm to the victims, search suggests that peer assaults by 4-year-olds differ little from p. er assaults2by 16-year-olds or 33-year-olds ...
If you are in danger, call a local hotline, the National Domestic Violence Hotline, or, if it is safe to do so, 911. The National Domestic Violence Hotline provides confidential and anonymous support 24/7. Reach out by phone at 1-800-799-7233 and TTY 1-800-787-3224. Loveisrespect provides teens and young adults confidential and anonymous support.
Question. 2 answers. Mar 12, 2024. Despite of certain psychiatric conditions that could increase a person's risk of committing a crime, research suggests that patients with mental illness/disorder ...
Domestic violence is an acute and prevalent problem in society which requires research and effective solutions. The incidence of domestic violence is increasing exponentially. Revealing Marital Rape as Domestic Violence. Marital rape entails sexual action with one's partner devoid of his or her consent.
PurposeFamily violence, encompassing intimate partner violence (IPV) and child maltreatment (CM), is a considerable public health issue affecting a large subset of the U.S. population. Military families may be exposed to unique risk factors for experiencing family violence. Interventions to address family violence that are specific to military and Veteran populations are critical to the ...