Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.
- View all journals
![](http://2me.site/777/templates/cheerup/res/banner1.gif)
Environmental sciences articles from across Nature Portfolio
Environmental science is the multidisciplinary study of all aspects of the Earth’s physical and biological environments. It encompasses environmental chemistry, soil science, ecology, climatology, vegetation cover, marine and freshwater systems, as well as environmental remediation and preservation, and agriculture and land use.
![environ research environ research](https://media.springernature.com/w290h158/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41560-024-01545-3/MediaObjects/41560_2024_1545_Fig1_HTML.png)
Policy credibility is a key component for an effective and efficient EU Emissions Trading System
Recent reforms of the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) boosted carbon prices by tightening the cap on emission allowances and increasing political commitment to it, which effectively made actors more farsighted. Policymakers should thus view prices as an indicator of credibility as well as scarcity, and manage potential future drops in the former by renewing commitment to the cap.
- Joanna Sitarz
- Michael Pahle
- Robert Pietzcker
![environ research environ research](https://media.springernature.com/w290h158/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1038%2Fs44221-024-00263-0/MediaObjects/44221_2024_263_Fig1_HTML.png)
Microplastics, microfibres and marine snows
A digital method of studying the dynamic behaviours of marine and lake snows in the water column will help to speed up investigations of their behaviour and of the ecological impact of microplastics and microfibres in water bodies.
- Tamara S. Galloway
- Adam Porter
![environ research environ research](https://media.springernature.com/w290h158/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1038%2Fs44221-024-00259-w/MediaObjects/44221_2024_259_Fig1_HTML.png)
Organic photodetectors to monitor water contaminants
Organic photodetectors can be an alternative to silicon ones in detecting water contaminants, but their noise is too high due to disorder. Using pre-formed crystalline organic colloids to reduce the disorder in organic photodiodes helps to improve their performance to achieve detection of contaminants even at low concentrations.
- Jinsong Huang
Related Subjects
- Environmental chemistry
- Environmental impact
Latest Research and Reviews
![environ research environ research](https://media.springernature.com/w290h158/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41612-024-00694-2/MediaObjects/41612_2024_694_Fig1_HTML.png)
Hemispherical scale mechanisms of nitrate formation in global marine aerosols
- Hongliang Li
![environ research environ research](https://media.springernature.com/w290h158/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41428-024-00918-5/MediaObjects/41428_2024_918_Figa_HTML.png)
Improvement in the physical properties of poly(lactic acid)/thermoplastic starch blends using oligo(lactic acid)-grafted starch
Blends of poly(lactic acid) (PLA) and thermoplastic starch (TPS) are promising biodegradable plastics, although their poor compatibility results in poor physical properties. In this study, oligo(lactic acid)-grafted starch (OLAgSt) was synthesized and added to PLA/TPS blends as a compatibilizer, and the physical properties of the obtained blends were evaluated. OLAgSt was synthesized by ring-opening polymerization of L-lactide using the hydroxy group of tapioca starch as an initiator. OLAgSt not only enhanced the dispersion of TPS within PLA, but also improved the biodegradability of the blend in a seawater environment.
- Kazuki Shibasaki
- Hiroshi Uyama
![environ research environ research](https://media.springernature.com/w290h158/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41598-024-64715-z/MediaObjects/41598_2024_64715_Fig1_HTML.png)
Unveiling green corrosion inhibitor of Aloe vera extracts for API 5L steel in seawater environment
- Ahmad Royani
- Muhammad Hanafi
- Azwar Manaf
![environ research environ research](https://media.springernature.com/w290h158/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41612-024-00692-4/MediaObjects/41612_2024_692_Fig1_HTML.png)
Deriving PM 2.5 from satellite observations with spatiotemporally weighted tree-based algorithms: enhancing modeling accuracy and interpretability
![environ research environ research](https://media.springernature.com/w290h158/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41545-024-00347-0/MediaObjects/41545_2024_347_Fig1_HTML.png)
A super-efficient gel adsorbent with over 1000 times the adsorption capacity of activated carbon
![environ research environ research](https://media.springernature.com/w290h158/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41598-024-65001-8/MediaObjects/41598_2024_65001_Fig1_HTML.png)
Sedentary behaviour may cause differences in physical outcomes and activities of daily living in older cardiovascular disease patients participating in phase I cardiac rehabilitation
- Kazuhiro P. Izawa
- Kodai Ishihara
- Ikki Shimizu
News and Comment
Earth-surface monitoring is at risk — more imaging tools are urgently needed.
- Etienne Berthier
- Jeffrey S. Kargel
- Michael Zemp
The global refugee crisis is above all a human tragedy — but it affects wildlife, too
- Andrew D. Walde
- Gift S. Demaya
- Luca Luiselli
![environ research environ research](https://media.springernature.com/w290h158/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1038%2Fs44222-024-00215-z/MediaObjects/44222_2024_215_Figa_HTML.png)
Herbicide-degrading synthetic microbiome
An article in Nature Communications reports a metabolic modelling-based framework to construct synthetic microbiomes that can degrade specific herbicides in soil.
- Christine-Maria Horejs
![environ research environ research](https://media.springernature.com/w290h158/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41570-024-00626-x/MediaObjects/41570_2024_626_Figa_HTML.png)
From lab coats to winning votes
As an atmospheric chemist in Lebanon, Najat Aoun Saliba was propelled towards activism to combat rising pollution levels and inequality. This culminated in her election to become a member of the Lebanese parliament.
- Najat Aoun Saliba
- Stephanie Greed
![environ research environ research](https://media.springernature.com/w290h158/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1038%2Fs43016-024-01001-1/MediaObjects/43016_2024_1001_Fig1_HTML.png)
Root–soil–microbiome management is key to the success of regenerative agriculture
Building soil health and manipulating the soil microbiome, alongside targeted plant breeding that prioritizes preferential root architectural development, hold the key to the future success of regenerative agriculture. Greater integration is needed between disciplines focused on the rhizosphere scale with plant, microbiome and soil scientists working at the wider farm scale.
- Sacha J. Mooney
- Gabriel Castrillo
- Malcolm J. Bennett
Quick links
- Explore articles by subject
- Guide to authors
- Editorial policies
![environ research environ research](https://verify.nature.com/verify/nature.png)
Environmental Research
![environ research environ research](https://www.scimagojr.com/img/sir_white.png)
Subject Area and Category
- Biochemistry
- Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
Academic Press Inc.
Publication type
00139351, 10960953
Information
How to publish in this journal
![environ research environ research](https://www.scimagojr.com/img/comments_icon_black.png)
The set of journals have been ranked according to their SJR and divided into four equal groups, four quartiles. Q1 (green) comprises the quarter of the journals with the highest values, Q2 (yellow) the second highest values, Q3 (orange) the third highest values and Q4 (red) the lowest values.
Category | Year | Quartile |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry | 1999 | Q2 |
Biochemistry | 2000 | Q2 |
Biochemistry | 2001 | Q2 |
Biochemistry | 2002 | Q2 |
Biochemistry | 2003 | Q3 |
Biochemistry | 2004 | Q2 |
Biochemistry | 2005 | Q2 |
Biochemistry | 2006 | Q2 |
Biochemistry | 2007 | Q2 |
Biochemistry | 2008 | Q2 |
Biochemistry | 2009 | Q2 |
Biochemistry | 2010 | Q1 |
Biochemistry | 2011 | Q1 |
Biochemistry | 2012 | Q1 |
Biochemistry | 2013 | Q1 |
Biochemistry | 2014 | Q1 |
Biochemistry | 2015 | Q2 |
Biochemistry | 2016 | Q1 |
Biochemistry | 2017 | Q1 |
Biochemistry | 2018 | Q1 |
Biochemistry | 2019 | Q1 |
Biochemistry | 2020 | Q1 |
Biochemistry | 2021 | Q1 |
Biochemistry | 2022 | Q1 |
Biochemistry | 2023 | Q1 |
Environmental Science (miscellaneous) | 1999 | Q1 |
Environmental Science (miscellaneous) | 2000 | Q1 |
Environmental Science (miscellaneous) | 2001 | Q1 |
Environmental Science (miscellaneous) | 2002 | Q1 |
Environmental Science (miscellaneous) | 2003 | Q1 |
Environmental Science (miscellaneous) | 2004 | Q1 |
Environmental Science (miscellaneous) | 2005 | Q1 |
Environmental Science (miscellaneous) | 2006 | Q1 |
Environmental Science (miscellaneous) | 2007 | Q1 |
Environmental Science (miscellaneous) | 2008 | Q1 |
Environmental Science (miscellaneous) | 2009 | Q1 |
Environmental Science (miscellaneous) | 2010 | Q1 |
Environmental Science (miscellaneous) | 2011 | Q1 |
Environmental Science (miscellaneous) | 2012 | Q1 |
Environmental Science (miscellaneous) | 2013 | Q1 |
Environmental Science (miscellaneous) | 2014 | Q1 |
Environmental Science (miscellaneous) | 2015 | Q1 |
Environmental Science (miscellaneous) | 2016 | Q1 |
Environmental Science (miscellaneous) | 2017 | Q1 |
Environmental Science (miscellaneous) | 2018 | Q1 |
Environmental Science (miscellaneous) | 2019 | Q1 |
Environmental Science (miscellaneous) | 2020 | Q1 |
Environmental Science (miscellaneous) | 2021 | Q1 |
Environmental Science (miscellaneous) | 2022 | Q1 |
Environmental Science (miscellaneous) | 2023 | Q1 |
The SJR is a size-independent prestige indicator that ranks journals by their 'average prestige per article'. It is based on the idea that 'all citations are not created equal'. SJR is a measure of scientific influence of journals that accounts for both the number of citations received by a journal and the importance or prestige of the journals where such citations come from It measures the scientific influence of the average article in a journal, it expresses how central to the global scientific discussion an average article of the journal is.
Year | SJR |
---|---|
1999 | 0.708 |
2000 | 0.910 |
2001 | 0.923 |
2002 | 0.939 |
2003 | 0.752 |
2004 | 0.824 |
2005 | 1.094 |
2006 | 1.198 |
2007 | 1.318 |
2008 | 1.372 |
2009 | 1.506 |
2010 | 1.664 |
2011 | 1.703 |
2012 | 1.541 |
2013 | 1.569 |
2014 | 1.794 |
2015 | 1.424 |
2016 | 1.413 |
2017 | 1.605 |
2018 | 1.567 |
2019 | 1.520 |
2020 | 1.460 |
2021 | 1.507 |
2022 | 1.635 |
2023 | 1.679 |
Evolution of the number of published documents. All types of documents are considered, including citable and non citable documents.
Year | Documents |
---|---|
1999 | 113 |
2000 | 91 |
2001 | 84 |
2002 | 85 |
2003 | 96 |
2004 | 125 |
2005 | 141 |
2006 | 133 |
2007 | 141 |
2008 | 165 |
2009 | 139 |
2010 | 115 |
2011 | 185 |
2012 | 122 |
2013 | 134 |
2014 | 287 |
2015 | 407 |
2016 | 429 |
2017 | 475 |
2018 | 498 |
2019 | 715 |
2020 | 1245 |
2021 | 1421 |
2022 | 2383 |
2023 | 2677 |
This indicator counts the number of citations received by documents from a journal and divides them by the total number of documents published in that journal. The chart shows the evolution of the average number of times documents published in a journal in the past two, three and four years have been cited in the current year. The two years line is equivalent to journal impact factor ™ (Thomson Reuters) metric.
Cites per document | Year | Value |
---|---|---|
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 1999 | 1.512 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2000 | 2.199 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2001 | 1.976 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2002 | 2.270 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2003 | 2.099 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2004 | 2.275 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2005 | 2.831 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2006 | 3.166 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2007 | 3.491 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2008 | 3.385 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2009 | 3.674 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2010 | 3.893 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2011 | 4.248 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2012 | 4.096 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2013 | 4.123 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2014 | 4.773 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2015 | 4.453 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2016 | 4.745 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2017 | 4.956 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2018 | 5.380 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2019 | 6.250 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2020 | 6.796 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2021 | 8.060 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2022 | 8.846 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2023 | 8.769 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 1999 | 1.512 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2000 | 2.199 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2001 | 1.950 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2002 | 2.132 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2003 | 2.058 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2004 | 2.083 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2005 | 2.797 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2006 | 3.110 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2007 | 3.474 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2008 | 3.306 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2009 | 3.599 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2010 | 3.834 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2011 | 4.131 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2012 | 3.715 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2013 | 4.100 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2014 | 4.907 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2015 | 4.206 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2016 | 4.519 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2017 | 4.968 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2018 | 5.526 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2019 | 6.139 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2020 | 6.738 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2021 | 7.915 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2022 | 8.878 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2023 | 8.801 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 1999 | 1.512 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2000 | 2.073 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2001 | 1.740 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2002 | 1.931 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2003 | 1.680 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2004 | 2.006 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2005 | 2.715 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2006 | 2.902 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2007 | 3.230 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2008 | 2.978 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2009 | 3.507 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2010 | 3.566 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2011 | 3.579 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2012 | 3.403 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2013 | 4.147 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2014 | 4.715 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2015 | 3.691 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2016 | 4.427 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2017 | 5.049 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2018 | 5.309 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2019 | 6.066 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2020 | 6.446 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2021 | 7.781 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2022 | 8.866 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2023 | 8.913 |
Evolution of the total number of citations and journal's self-citations received by a journal's published documents during the three previous years. Journal Self-citation is defined as the number of citation from a journal citing article to articles published by the same journal.
Cites | Year | Value |
---|---|---|
Self Cites | 1999 | 9 |
Self Cites | 2000 | 41 |
Self Cites | 2001 | 36 |
Self Cites | 2002 | 41 |
Self Cites | 2003 | 34 |
Self Cites | 2004 | 41 |
Self Cites | 2005 | 68 |
Self Cites | 2006 | 57 |
Self Cites | 2007 | 64 |
Self Cites | 2008 | 76 |
Self Cites | 2009 | 74 |
Self Cites | 2010 | 66 |
Self Cites | 2011 | 104 |
Self Cites | 2012 | 72 |
Self Cites | 2013 | 65 |
Self Cites | 2014 | 114 |
Self Cites | 2015 | 153 |
Self Cites | 2016 | 283 |
Self Cites | 2017 | 391 |
Self Cites | 2018 | 490 |
Self Cites | 2019 | 753 |
Self Cites | 2020 | 936 |
Self Cites | 2021 | 1406 |
Self Cites | 2022 | 2520 |
Self Cites | 2023 | 2693 |
Total Cites | 1999 | 254 |
Total Cites | 2000 | 618 |
Total Cites | 2001 | 550 |
Total Cites | 2002 | 614 |
Total Cites | 2003 | 535 |
Total Cites | 2004 | 552 |
Total Cites | 2005 | 856 |
Total Cites | 2006 | 1126 |
Total Cites | 2007 | 1386 |
Total Cites | 2008 | 1372 |
Total Cites | 2009 | 1580 |
Total Cites | 2010 | 1706 |
Total Cites | 2011 | 1731 |
Total Cites | 2012 | 1631 |
Total Cites | 2013 | 1730 |
Total Cites | 2014 | 2164 |
Total Cites | 2015 | 2284 |
Total Cites | 2016 | 3742 |
Total Cites | 2017 | 5579 |
Total Cites | 2018 | 7244 |
Total Cites | 2019 | 8607 |
Total Cites | 2020 | 11374 |
Total Cites | 2021 | 19455 |
Total Cites | 2022 | 30017 |
Total Cites | 2023 | 44435 |
Evolution of the number of total citation per document and external citation per document (i.e. journal self-citations removed) received by a journal's published documents during the three previous years. External citations are calculated by subtracting the number of self-citations from the total number of citations received by the journal’s documents.
Cites | Year | Value |
---|---|---|
External Cites per document | 1999 | 1.458 |
External Cites per document | 2000 | 2.053 |
External Cites per document | 2001 | 1.823 |
External Cites per document | 2002 | 1.990 |
External Cites per document | 2003 | 1.927 |
External Cites per document | 2004 | 1.928 |
External Cites per document | 2005 | 2.575 |
External Cites per document | 2006 | 2.953 |
External Cites per document | 2007 | 3.313 |
External Cites per document | 2008 | 3.123 |
External Cites per document | 2009 | 3.431 |
External Cites per document | 2010 | 3.685 |
External Cites per document | 2011 | 3.883 |
External Cites per document | 2012 | 3.551 |
External Cites per document | 2013 | 3.945 |
External Cites per document | 2014 | 4.649 |
External Cites per document | 2015 | 3.924 |
External Cites per document | 2016 | 4.178 |
External Cites per document | 2017 | 4.620 |
External Cites per document | 2018 | 5.152 |
External Cites per document | 2019 | 5.602 |
External Cites per document | 2020 | 6.184 |
External Cites per document | 2021 | 7.343 |
External Cites per document | 2022 | 8.133 |
External Cites per document | 2023 | 8.267 |
Cites per document | 1999 | 1.512 |
Cites per document | 2000 | 2.199 |
Cites per document | 2001 | 1.950 |
Cites per document | 2002 | 2.132 |
Cites per document | 2003 | 2.058 |
Cites per document | 2004 | 2.083 |
Cites per document | 2005 | 2.797 |
Cites per document | 2006 | 3.110 |
Cites per document | 2007 | 3.474 |
Cites per document | 2008 | 3.306 |
Cites per document | 2009 | 3.599 |
Cites per document | 2010 | 3.834 |
Cites per document | 2011 | 4.131 |
Cites per document | 2012 | 3.715 |
Cites per document | 2013 | 4.100 |
Cites per document | 2014 | 4.907 |
Cites per document | 2015 | 4.206 |
Cites per document | 2016 | 4.519 |
Cites per document | 2017 | 4.968 |
Cites per document | 2018 | 5.526 |
Cites per document | 2019 | 6.139 |
Cites per document | 2020 | 6.738 |
Cites per document | 2021 | 7.915 |
Cites per document | 2022 | 8.878 |
Cites per document | 2023 | 8.801 |
International Collaboration accounts for the articles that have been produced by researchers from several countries. The chart shows the ratio of a journal's documents signed by researchers from more than one country; that is including more than one country address.
Year | International Collaboration |
---|---|
1999 | 12.39 |
2000 | 28.57 |
2001 | 20.24 |
2002 | 24.71 |
2003 | 14.58 |
2004 | 24.80 |
2005 | 18.44 |
2006 | 19.55 |
2007 | 22.70 |
2008 | 23.03 |
2009 | 25.18 |
2010 | 26.09 |
2011 | 28.11 |
2012 | 35.25 |
2013 | 27.61 |
2014 | 29.62 |
2015 | 44.96 |
2016 | 44.76 |
2017 | 40.63 |
2018 | 45.98 |
2019 | 44.90 |
2020 | 38.39 |
2021 | 41.80 |
2022 | 42.51 |
2023 | 41.65 |
Not every article in a journal is considered primary research and therefore "citable", this chart shows the ratio of a journal's articles including substantial research (research articles, conference papers and reviews) in three year windows vs. those documents other than research articles, reviews and conference papers.
Documents | Year | Value |
---|---|---|
Non-citable documents | 1999 | 2 |
Non-citable documents | 2000 | 2 |
Non-citable documents | 2001 | 5 |
Non-citable documents | 2002 | 4 |
Non-citable documents | 2003 | 6 |
Non-citable documents | 2004 | 4 |
Non-citable documents | 2005 | 5 |
Non-citable documents | 2006 | 9 |
Non-citable documents | 2007 | 13 |
Non-citable documents | 2008 | 20 |
Non-citable documents | 2009 | 29 |
Non-citable documents | 2010 | 31 |
Non-citable documents | 2011 | 33 |
Non-citable documents | 2012 | 31 |
Non-citable documents | 2013 | 31 |
Non-citable documents | 2014 | 25 |
Non-citable documents | 2015 | 21 |
Non-citable documents | 2016 | 20 |
Non-citable documents | 2017 | 24 |
Non-citable documents | 2018 | 26 |
Non-citable documents | 2019 | 29 |
Non-citable documents | 2020 | 38 |
Non-citable documents | 2021 | 51 |
Non-citable documents | 2022 | 63 |
Non-citable documents | 2023 | 68 |
Citable documents | 1999 | 166 |
Citable documents | 2000 | 279 |
Citable documents | 2001 | 277 |
Citable documents | 2002 | 284 |
Citable documents | 2003 | 254 |
Citable documents | 2004 | 261 |
Citable documents | 2005 | 301 |
Citable documents | 2006 | 353 |
Citable documents | 2007 | 386 |
Citable documents | 2008 | 395 |
Citable documents | 2009 | 410 |
Citable documents | 2010 | 414 |
Citable documents | 2011 | 386 |
Citable documents | 2012 | 408 |
Citable documents | 2013 | 391 |
Citable documents | 2014 | 416 |
Citable documents | 2015 | 522 |
Citable documents | 2016 | 808 |
Citable documents | 2017 | 1099 |
Citable documents | 2018 | 1285 |
Citable documents | 2019 | 1373 |
Citable documents | 2020 | 1650 |
Citable documents | 2021 | 2407 |
Citable documents | 2022 | 3318 |
Citable documents | 2023 | 4981 |
Ratio of a journal's items, grouped in three years windows, that have been cited at least once vs. those not cited during the following year.
Documents | Year | Value |
---|---|---|
Uncited documents | 1999 | 63 |
Uncited documents | 2000 | 86 |
Uncited documents | 2001 | 88 |
Uncited documents | 2002 | 81 |
Uncited documents | 2003 | 81 |
Uncited documents | 2004 | 74 |
Uncited documents | 2005 | 59 |
Uncited documents | 2006 | 69 |
Uncited documents | 2007 | 66 |
Uncited documents | 2008 | 53 |
Uncited documents | 2009 | 66 |
Uncited documents | 2010 | 74 |
Uncited documents | 2011 | 71 |
Uncited documents | 2012 | 62 |
Uncited documents | 2013 | 50 |
Uncited documents | 2014 | 45 |
Uncited documents | 2015 | 68 |
Uncited documents | 2016 | 74 |
Uncited documents | 2017 | 93 |
Uncited documents | 2018 | 114 |
Uncited documents | 2019 | 87 |
Uncited documents | 2020 | 131 |
Uncited documents | 2021 | 138 |
Uncited documents | 2022 | 150 |
Uncited documents | 2023 | 204 |
Cited documents | 1999 | 105 |
Cited documents | 2000 | 195 |
Cited documents | 2001 | 194 |
Cited documents | 2002 | 207 |
Cited documents | 2003 | 179 |
Cited documents | 2004 | 191 |
Cited documents | 2005 | 247 |
Cited documents | 2006 | 293 |
Cited documents | 2007 | 333 |
Cited documents | 2008 | 362 |
Cited documents | 2009 | 373 |
Cited documents | 2010 | 371 |
Cited documents | 2011 | 348 |
Cited documents | 2012 | 377 |
Cited documents | 2013 | 372 |
Cited documents | 2014 | 396 |
Cited documents | 2015 | 475 |
Cited documents | 2016 | 754 |
Cited documents | 2017 | 1030 |
Cited documents | 2018 | 1197 |
Cited documents | 2019 | 1315 |
Cited documents | 2020 | 1557 |
Cited documents | 2021 | 2320 |
Cited documents | 2022 | 3231 |
Cited documents | 2023 | 4845 |
Evolution of the percentage of female authors.
Year | Female Percent |
---|---|
1999 | 35.89 |
2000 | 33.63 |
2001 | 37.85 |
2002 | 35.17 |
2003 | 39.30 |
2004 | 40.23 |
2005 | 38.95 |
2006 | 40.03 |
2007 | 41.02 |
2008 | 42.46 |
2009 | 48.08 |
2010 | 45.17 |
2011 | 44.24 |
2012 | 47.07 |
2013 | 45.58 |
2014 | 45.54 |
2015 | 48.57 |
2016 | 47.92 |
2017 | 47.93 |
2018 | 47.64 |
2019 | 46.18 |
2020 | 43.75 |
2021 | 42.79 |
2022 | 43.12 |
2023 | 41.42 |
Evolution of the number of documents cited by public policy documents according to Overton database.
Documents | Year | Value |
---|---|---|
Overton | 1999 | 88 |
Overton | 2000 | 69 |
Overton | 2001 | 62 |
Overton | 2002 | 55 |
Overton | 2003 | 2 |
Overton | 2004 | 56 |
Overton | 2005 | 87 |
Overton | 2006 | 93 |
Overton | 2007 | 86 |
Overton | 2008 | 109 |
Overton | 2009 | 86 |
Overton | 2010 | 77 |
Overton | 2011 | 121 |
Overton | 2012 | 76 |
Overton | 2013 | 86 |
Overton | 2014 | 145 |
Overton | 2015 | 227 |
Overton | 2016 | 221 |
Overton | 2017 | 208 |
Overton | 2018 | 203 |
Overton | 2019 | 215 |
Overton | 2020 | 192 |
Overton | 2021 | 184 |
Overton | 2022 | 113 |
Overton | 2023 | 24 |
Evoution of the number of documents related to Sustainable Development Goals defined by United Nations. Available from 2018 onwards.
Documents | Year | Value |
---|---|---|
SDG | 2018 | 345 |
SDG | 2019 | 465 |
SDG | 2020 | 848 |
SDG | 2021 | 1034 |
SDG | 2022 | 1651 |
SDG | 2023 | 1870 |
Leave a comment
Name * Required
Email (will not be published) * Required
* Required Cancel
The users of Scimago Journal & Country Rank have the possibility to dialogue through comments linked to a specific journal. The purpose is to have a forum in which general doubts about the processes of publication in the journal, experiences and other issues derived from the publication of papers are resolved. For topics on particular articles, maintain the dialogue through the usual channels with your editor.
![environ research Scimago Lab](https://www.scimagojr.com/./img/logo_footer.png)
Follow us on @ScimagoJR Scimago Lab , Copyright 2007-2024. Data Source: Scopus®
![environ research](https://www.scimagojr.com/./img/estmodusinrebus.png)
Cookie settings
Cookie Policy
Legal Notice
Privacy Policy
Sustainable Environment Research
Call for papers: upcoming collection, nature-based solutions for climate change adaptation, guest edited by: pierre-antoine versini, amy oen, natalia rodriguez and daniela rizzi.
- Most accessed
Application of fluidized-bed homogeneous crystallization technology to carbon sequestration and recovery from flue gas
Authors: Po-Chun Huang, Anabella C. Vilando, Thi-Hanh Ha and Ming-Chun Lu
Emission characterizations and environmental impacts of off-road vehicles
Authors: Hsing-Wang Li, Chia-Hsiang Lai, Ku-Fan Chen, Yi-Ching Lin, Po-Yen Chien, Wei-Hsiang Chen, Kang-Shin Chen and Yen-Ping Peng
Investigating the bacterial consortia properties of electrogenic anodic biofilm in a double-chamber microbial fuel cell: electrochemical, physical, biochemical and molecular characterization
Authors: Doaa Khodary Zater, Fatma I. Elzamik, Howaida M. Abdel Basit, Gamal El-Din M. Moustafa, Dena Z. Khater and Kamel M. El-Khatib
Photodegradation of six selected antipsychiatric drugs; carbamazepine, sertraline, amisulpride, amitriptyline, diazepam, and alprazolam in environment: efficiency, pathway, and mechanism—a review
Authors: Fahimeh Mohamadpour and Farzaneh Mohamadpour
Resources recovery-rubidium recovery from desalination brine through hydrometallurgy techniques
Authors: Cheng-Han Lee, Wei-Sheng Chen and Fan-Wei Liu
Most recent articles RSS
View all articles
Biological wastewater treatment and bioreactor design: a review
Authors: C. M. Narayanan and Vikas Narayan
A comprehensive review on indoor air quality monitoring systems for enhanced public health
Authors: Jagriti Saini, Maitreyee Dutta and Gonçalo Marques
A system for monitoring water quality in a large aquatic area using wireless sensor network technology
Authors: Alexander T. Demetillo, Michelle V. Japitana and Evelyn B. Taboada
Study of the feasibility of a rice husk recycling scheme in Japan to produce silica fertilizer for rice plants
Authors: Ryoko Sekifuji and Masafumi Tateda
Near infrared band of Landsat 8 as water index: a case study around Cordova and Lapu-Lapu City, Cebu, Philippines
Authors: Jeremy P. Mondejar and Alejandro F. Tongco
Most accessed articles RSS
Journal Announcement
2020-2022 Editor's Choice Articles
Archival Content
The archival content of Sustainable Environment Research can be located here .
Aims and scope
The primary goal of Sustainable Environment Research (SER) is to publish high quality research articles associated with sustainable environmental science and technology and to contribute to improving environmental practice. The scope of SER includes issues of environmental science, technology, management and related fields, especially in response to sustainable water, energy and other natural resources. Potential topics include, but are not limited to:
1. Water and Wastewater
• Biological processes • Physical and chemical processes • Watershed management • Advanced and innovative treatment
2. Soil and Groundwater Pollution
• Contaminant fate and transport processes • Contaminant site investigation technology • Soil and groundwater remediation technology • Risk assessment in contaminant sites
3. Air Pollution and Climate Change
• Ambient air quality management • Greenhouse gases control • Gaseous and particulate pollution control • Indoor air quality management and control
4. Waste Management
• Waste reduction and minimization • Resource recovery and conservation • Solid waste treatment technology and disposal
5. Energy and Resources
• Sustainable energy • Local, regional and global sustainability • Environmental management system • Life-cycle assessment • Environmental policy instruments • Techno-economic assessment
- Editorial Board
- Instructions for Editors
- Sign up for article alerts and news from this journal
- Follow SER on Linkedin
Affiliated with
Sustainable Environment Research is affiliated with the Chinese Institute of Environmental Engineering
Annual Journal Metrics
2022 Citation Impact 4.9 - 2-year Impact Factor 6.4 - 5-year Impact Factor 1.899 - SNIP (Source Normalized Impact per Paper) 0.865 - SJR (SCImago Journal Rank)
2023 Speed 23 days submission to first editorial decision for all manuscripts (Median) 147 days submission to accept (Median)
2023 Usage 354,574 downloads 25 Altmetric mentions
ISSN: 2468-2039
- Submission enquiries: Access here and click Contact Us
- General enquiries: [email protected]
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
Environmental Science and Pollution Research (ESPR) serves the international community in all broad areas of environmental science and related subjects with emphasis on chemical compounds.
- Covers all areas of Environmental Science and related subjects.
- Publishes on the natural sciences, but also includes the impacts of legislation, regulation, and the economy on pollution control.
- Safeguards international and interdisciplinary character through a global network of editorial board members.
- Official publication of the EuCheMS Division of Chemistry and the Environment.
- Authors from participating institutions can publish Open Choice at no cost.
- Philippe Garrigues
Societies and partnerships
Latest issue
Volume 31, Issue 26
Latest articles
Hydrodynamics and water quality of a highly anthropized wetland: the case study of the massaciuccoli basin (tuscany, italy).
- Francesca Pasquetti
- Stefano Natali
- Roberto Giannecchini
![environ research environ research](https://media.springernature.com/w110h61/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11356-024-33899-2/MediaObjects/11356_2024_33899_Fig1_HTML.png?as=webp)
A critical review on the influence of operating parameters and feedstock characteristics on microwave pyrolysis of biomass
- Sridhar Palla
- Dadi Venkata Surya
- Venkata Chandra Sekhar Palla
![environ research environ research](https://media.springernature.com/w110h61/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11356-024-33607-0/MediaObjects/11356_2024_33607_Fig1_HTML.png?as=webp)
Effects of residual foaming agent and defoamer on defoaming-flocculation-filterpress characteristics of earth pressure balance shield muck
![environ research environ research](https://media.springernature.com/w110h61/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11356-024-33946-y/MediaObjects/11356_2024_33946_Fig1_HTML.png?as=webp)
Marine macro-litter mass outweighs biomass in trawl catches along abyssal seafloors of Sardinia channel (Italy)
- Ester Carreras-Colom
- Maria Cristina Follesa
- Alessandro Cau
![environ research environ research](https://media.springernature.com/w110h61/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11356-024-33909-3/MediaObjects/11356_2024_33909_Fig1_HTML.png?as=webp)
Residues of veterinary antibiotics in solid natural and organic fertilizers—method development and sample analysis
- Ewelina Patyra
- Zbigniew Osiński
- Krzysztof Kwiatek
![environ research environ research](https://media.springernature.com/w110h61/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11356-024-33956-w/MediaObjects/11356_2024_33956_Fig1_HTML.png?as=webp)
Journal updates
Meet the editors.
Learn more about the ESPR editors!
Special Issues
We invite you to browse through recently published special issues of Environmental Science and Pollution Research: Click here to get an overview of ESPR issues! All manuscripts will be peer reviewed as usual and following the journal's policies , with final decisions made by the Editor-in-Chief.
Special Issue Proposal Form
Call for Papers: Special Issue on Carbon Capture and Utilization: Turning CO2 into Valuable Products (CCUTVP 2023)
Journal information.
- Astrophysics Data System (ADS)
- Biological Abstracts
- CAB Abstracts
- Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS)
- Current Contents/Agriculture, Biology & Environmental Sciences
- EI Compendex
- Engineering Village – GEOBASE
- Google Scholar
- INIS Atomindex
- Japanese Science and Technology Agency (JST)
- OCLC WorldCat Discovery Service
- Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE)
- Semantic Scholar
- TD Net Discovery Service
- UGC-CARE List (India)
Rights and permissions
Editorial policies
© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature
- Find a journal
- Publish with us
- Track your research
Environmental Systems Research
![environ research Environmental Systems Research Cover Image](https://media.springernature.com/w110/springer-static/cover/journal/40068.jpg)
Guest Editors: Prof. Dr. Xiaowei Wu, Dr. Pradnya D. Rao, Dr. Ula Rozman, Dr. Oriol Rius Ayra Submission Status: Open from 20 June 2024 | Submission Deadline: 31 January 2025
Guest Editors: Qaisar Mahmood, Sunil Kumar and Paromita Chakraborty Submission Status: Open | Submission Deadline: 30 June 2024
![](http://2me.site/777/templates/cheerup/res/banner1.gif)
Minimizing environmental impacts of timber products through the production process “From Sawmill to Final Products”
Authors: Shankar Adhikari and Barbara Ozarska
Natural resource degradation tendencies in Ethiopia: a review
Authors: Simachew Bantigegn Wassie
Most accessed articles RSS
Editor's choices
Geospatial assessment of urban green space using multi-criteria decision analysis in Debre Markos City, Ethiopia Mihret Bizuye Anteneh, Desta Solomon Damte, Simeneh Gedefaw Abate & Abebaw Andarge Gedefaw Research Published: 21 March 2023
Application of artificial intelligence for forecasting surface quality index of irrigation systems in the Red River Delta, Vietnam Duc Phong Nguyen, Hai Duong Ha, Ngoc Thang Trinh & Minh Tu Nguyen Research Published: 04 July 2023
Geo-hazards assessment of the new-found industrial communities: an example from the 10th of Ramadan Industrial Region, Egypt Ahmed E. El-Rayes, Mohamed O. Arnous, David R. Green & Norhan F. Gouda Research Published: 23 June 2023
Asset management analytics for urban water mains: a literature review Atefeh Delnaz, Fuzhan Nasiri & S. Samuel Li Review Published: 18 April 2023
Toxicological response and bioaccumulation of strontium in Festuca rubra L. (red fescue) and Trifolium pratense L. (red clover) in contaminated soil microcosms Phatchani Srikhumsuk, Tatyana Peshkur, Joanna C. Renshaw & Charles W. Knapp Research Published: 11 May 2023
Rapid spilled oil analysis using direct analysis in real time time-of-flight mass spectrometry Krishnaja Tikkisetty, Paige McCallum, Taylor Filewood, Jeffrey Yan, Honoria Kwok, Pamela Brunswick, Robert Cody & Dayue Shang Research Published: 11 March 2023
Residential fuel consumption and technology choices: an application of FGNLS and random effects binary logit model Nuredin Juhar, Gunnar Köhlin & Alemu Mekonnen Research Published: 10 June 2023
Measurement of ambient particulate matter (PM1.0, PM2.5 and PM10) in Khulna City of Bangladesh and their implications for human health Jobaer Ahmed Saju, Quazi Hamidul Bari, Kazi A. B. M. Mohiuddin & Vladimir Strezov Research Published: 19 December 2023
Remote sensing supported analysis of the effect of wind erosion on local air pollution in arid regions: a case study from Iğdır province in eastern Türkiye Yahya Öztürk, Adem Yulu & Orkun Turgay Case Study Published: 19 April 2023
Biocultural mapping: unpacking the myth of an unsuitable Country in the arid zone, Willandra Lakes Region World Heritage Area, Australia Katherine Thomas Research Published: 03 July 2023
Investigating the fate of polycyclic aromatic sulfur heterocycle compounds in spilled oils with a microcosm weathering experiment Taylor Filewood , Honoria Kwok , Pamela Brunswick , Jeffrey Yan , Jessica E. Ollinik , Christopher Cote , Marcus Kim , Graham van Aggelen , Caren C. Helbing & Dayue Shang Research Published: 30 March 2022
Bivariate hydrologic risk analysis for the Xiangxi River in Three Gorges Reservoir Area, China Y. R. Fan Research Published: 29 September 2022
Hyperaccumulation of lead using Agrostis tenuis Lorna Anguilano , Uchechukwu Onwukwe , Aghis Dekhli , Susanna Venditti , Danny Aryani & Alan Reynolds Research Published: 23 December 2022
Modeling the potential impacts of automated vehicles on pollutant emissions under different scenarios of a test track Zelalem Birhanu Biramo & Anteneh Afework Mekonnen Research Published: 12 December 2022
Synthesis of eco-friendly ZnO-based heterophotocatalysts with enhanced properties under visible light in the degradation of organic pollutants Jean Bedel Batchamen Mougnol , Frans Waanders , Seteno Karabo Obed Ntwampe , Elvis Fosso-Kankeu & Ali Rashed Al Alili Research Published: 20 November 2022
Effects of compost on onion quality, yield, and thrips infestation Allan T. Showler Research Published: 05 November 2022
Evaluation of the root system of Vetiver grass ( Chrysopogon zizanioides L. Roberty) using different sampling methods Francisco Sandro Rodrigues Holanda , Luiz Diego Vidal Santos , Alceu Pedrotti , Renisson Neponuceno de Araújo Filho , Lucas Resmini Sartor , Valter Rubens Alcantara Santos-Sobrinho , Rayssa Juliane Souza de Jesus , Priscila Angel de Oliveira Silva & Keila Maria Araújo Andrade Research Published: 02 September 2022
Quantify soil erosion and sediment export in response to land use/cover change in the Suha watershed, northwestern highlands of Ethiopia: implications for watershed management Nigussie Yeneneh , Eyasu Elias & Gudina Legese Feyisa Research Published: 28 October 2022
Climate trend analysis for a semi-arid Borana zone in southern Ethiopia during 1981–2018 Mitiku Adisu Worku , Gudina Legese Feyisa & Kassahun Ture Beketie Research Published: 04 March 2022
Appraisal of lead (Pb) contamination and potential exposure risk associated with agricultural soils and some cultivated plants in gold mines Aminu Darma , Sani Ibrahim , Ali Sani , Peiman Zandi & Jianjun Yang Research Published: 17 June 2022
Journal News
We are glad to announce that Environmental Systems Research has been accepted by Scopus and EI-Compendex!
Aims and scope
Environmental Systems Research publishes high-quality, interdisciplinary and refereed research papers, review and comment articles, and topical collections on all aspects of environmental systems from water (terrestrial and marine), air, soil and biota . The journal aims to advance and apply scientific knowledge and practical methods to improve our understanding of environmental and sustainability issues and support evidence-based policy making and eco-friendly practice at regional or global scales. The journal particularly encourages innovative, original and cross-disciplinary research on the development and use of new or improved methodologies and technologies for scientific studies and practical work in environmental fields. The journal coverage includes, but not limited to, the following topics: - Laboratory, field and modeling studies on sources, fate, transport and effect of traditional and emerging contaminants in the environments - Monitoring, analysis, prevention, treatment and remediation methods and techniques - Modeling methods and applications related to assessment, simulation, optimization and management of resources, environmental and ecological systems - Environmental impact and risk assessment, uncertainty analysis, vulnerability/resilience assessment, and life cycle analysis - Ecotoxicology, environmental health and safety - Artificial intelligence, machine learning, data mining, computer graphics, and geomatics for environmental and ecological studies - Environmental biotechnology, microbiology, and genomics - New material and nanotechnology and their environmental applications - Cleaner production, green chemistry, and resource-oriented waste management - Water resources and watershed modeling, storm water management, and flood/draught control - Climate change impact assessment and adaptation planning - Environmental sustainability, circular economy, and asset management - Environmental decision making, policy, legislation and governance
About the societies
The International Society for Environmental Information Sciences (ISEIS) is a non-profit and free-membership organization of individuals, institutions and corporations. The society is dedicated to the development of information systems technology for environmental applications. It promotes the international exchange of knowledge in the field of environmental information systems research.
The Persistent, Emerging, and Organic Pollution in the Environment (PEOPLE) is a global research and education network. As the largest consortium of its kind, PEOPLE is dedicated to innovative research, collaborative development, and cross-disciplinary education in environmental engineering and management, promotes knowledge exchange and technology transfer, and provides engineering and managerial solutions to support environmental and community sustainability.
- Editorial Board
- Sign up for article alerts and news from this journal
- Article Collections
- Editors' Choice articles
Affiliated with
Environmental Systems Research is associated with the global Network on Persistent, Emerging and Organic Pollution in the Environment (PEOPLE Network).
Annual Journal Metrics
2023 Speed 3 days submission to first editorial decision for all manuscripts (Median) 58 days submission to accept (Median)
2023 Usage 505,317 downloads 46 Altmetric mentions
- More about our metrics
- ISSN: 2193-2697 (electronic)
Information
- Author Services
Initiatives
You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.
All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .
Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.
Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.
Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.
Original Submission Date Received: .
- Active Journals
- Find a Journal
- Proceedings Series
- For Authors
- For Reviewers
- For Editors
- For Librarians
- For Publishers
- For Societies
- For Conference Organizers
- Open Access Policy
- Institutional Open Access Program
- Special Issues Guidelines
- Editorial Process
- Research and Publication Ethics
- Article Processing Charges
- Testimonials
- Preprints.org
- SciProfiles
- Encyclopedia
![environ research Exploring Allied Health Models of Care for Children with Developmental Health Concerns, Delays, and Disabilities in Rural and Remote Areas: A Systematic Scoping Review](https://pub.mdpi-res.com/title_story/title_story_17181032326712.jpg?1718701742)
Journal Description
International journal of environmental research and public health.
- Open Access — free for readers, with article processing charges (APC) paid by authors or their institutions.
- High Visibility: indexed within Scopus , PubMed , MEDLINE , PMC , Embase , GEOBASE , CAPlus / SciFinder , and other databases .
- Journal Rank: CiteScore - Q1 ( Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health )
- Rapid Publication: manuscripts are peer-reviewed and a first decision is provided to authors approximately 29.6 days after submission; acceptance to publication is undertaken in 3.9 days (median values for papers published in this journal in the second half of 2023).
- Recognition of Reviewers: reviewers who provide timely, thorough peer-review reports receive vouchers entitling them to a discount on the APC of their next publication in any MDPI journal, in appreciation of the work done.
- Testimonials: See what our editors and authors say about IJERPH .
- Sections: published in 7 topical sections .
Latest Articles
![environ research](https://pub.mdpi-res.com/ijerph/ijerph-21-00795/article_deploy/html/images/ijerph-21-00795-g001-550.jpg?1718715765)
Journal Menu
- IJERPH Home
- Aims & Scope
- Editorial Board
- Reviewer Board
- Topical Advisory Panel
- Instructions for Authors
Special Issues
- Sections & Collections
- Article Processing Charge
- Indexing & Archiving
- Editor’s Choice Articles
- Most Cited & Viewed
- Journal Statistics
- Journal History
- Journal Awards
- Society Collaborations
- Editorial Office
- 20th Anniversary
Journal Browser
- arrow_forward_ios Forthcoming issue arrow_forward_ios Current issue
- Vol. 21 (2024)
- Vol. 20 (2023)
- Vol. 19 (2022)
- Vol. 18 (2021)
- Vol. 17 (2020)
- Vol. 16 (2019)
- Vol. 15 (2018)
- Vol. 14 (2017)
- Vol. 13 (2016)
- Vol. 12 (2015)
- Vol. 11 (2014)
- Vol. 10 (2013)
- Vol. 9 (2012)
- Vol. 8 (2011)
- Vol. 7 (2010)
- Vol. 6 (2009)
- Vol. 5 (2008)
- Vol. 4 (2007)
- Vol. 3 (2006)
- Vol. 2 (2005)
- Vol. 1 (2004)
Highly Accessed Articles
Latest books, e-mail alert.
![environ research environ research](https://pub.mdpi-res.com/announcement/8589.jpg?1718701742)
Conferences
Topical collections, further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.
![MDPI Open Access Journals MDPI](https://pub.mdpi-res.com/img/design/mdpi-pub-logo-white-small.png?71d18e5f805839ab?1718701742)
Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals
Princeton Environmental Research Addressing the world’s problems
Disparities in the distribution of flood adaptation resources could be curbed by equity-weighting.
![environ research Disparities flooding](https://environmenthalfcentury.princeton.edu/sites/g/files/toruqf331/files/styles/16x9_1440w_810h/public/2024-06/article_banner_template_facebook_cover.jpg?itok=Rnj64fTy)
Photo Credit: Jax10289 from Getty Images
As the effects of climate change intensify, the need for efficient and equitable climate adaptation policies is becoming more urgent. This is especially true for U.S. coastal counties impacted by climate-induced sea-level rise and the socio-economically vulnerable areas within them that are often characterized by higher flood risks.
Conventional benefit-cost analyses used to allocate adaptation resources in coastal areas have often resulted in distributional inequities. In a study(Link is external) examining flooding adaptation measures in New York City (NYC), researchers at Princeton University and the Environmental Defense Fund show how a new type of benefit-cost analysis can better account for the value of flood mitigation benefits to low-income households.
The study focuses on two adaptation measures: property buyouts and retrofitting. Property buyouts are when governments purchase properties from residents in high flood-risk areas, while retrofitting involves elevating and wetproofing buildings. For each adaptation measure for each building, the researchers calculated benefit cost ratios (BCRs). The researchers calculated adaptation costs using data from the NYC Department of City Planning and the Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration. The benefits of each measure was quantified by calculating the value of expected avoided damages over a 50-year time horizon.
In an alternative model, the researchers recalculated benefit cost ratios with “equity-weighted” benefits that would operationalize the assumption that a dollar saved from avoided damages would have a greater effect on a low-income household’s well-being than a high-income household. In a benefit-cost analysis, these weights effectively place more value on the benefits of buyouts and home elevations in disadvantaged communities.
![environ research Michael Oppenheimer](https://environmenthalfcentury.princeton.edu/sites/g/files/toruqf331/files/styles/1x1_750w_750h/public/2020-09/20190910_OppenheimerM_EJ_DSC_9459%20%281%29.jpg?h=eece47ef&itok=uBIDzysf)
Advertisement
Supported by
Environmental Group to Study Effects of Artificially Cooling Earth
The Environmental Defense Fund, entering controversial territory, will spend millions of dollars examining the impact of reflecting sunlight into space as global warming worsens.
- Share full article
![environ research A column of mist rises into the air from the deck of an old aircraft carrier.](https://static01.nyt.com/images/2024/06/10/multimedia/10cli-SOLAR-GEOENGINEERING-01-lqzj/10cli-SOLAR-GEOENGINEERING-01-lqzj-articleLarge.jpg?quality=75&auto=webp&disable=upscale)
By Christopher Flavelle
The Environmental Defense Fund will finance research into technologies that could artificially cool the planet, an idea that until recently was viewed as radical but is quickly gaining attention as global temperatures rise at alarming rates.
The group hopes to start issuing grants this fall, said Lisa Dilling, associate chief scientist at E.D.F., who is running the project. She said research would focus on estimating the likely effects in different parts of the world if governments were to deploy artificial cooling technologies.
The intent is to help inform policymakers, she said. “We are not in favor, period, of deployment. That’s not our goal here,” Dr. Dilling said. “Our goal is information, and solid, well-formulated science.”
The Environmental Defense Fund has previously expressed skepticism about techniques like these. But Dr. Dilling says the discussion about ways to cool the planet isn’t going away, regardless of opposition. “This is something that I don’t think we can just ignore,” she said.
The group will fund what is sometimes called solar radiation modification, or solar geoengineering, which involves reflecting more of the sun’s energy back into space. Possible techniques involve injecting aerosols into the stratosphere, or brightening clouds to make them more reflective.
Researchers believe such actions could temporarily reduce global temperatures, until society reduces greenhouse gas emissions by burning far less fossil fuel.
We are having trouble retrieving the article content.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.
Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.
Thank you for your patience while we verify access.
Already a subscriber? Log in .
Want all of The Times? Subscribe .
Center for Policy Research on Energy and the Environment (C-PREE)
![environ research Home](https://cpree.princeton.edu/sites/g/files/toruqf651/files/CPREE_PU_color_PMS-transparent.png)
Disparities in the Distribution of Flood Adaptation Resources Could be Curbed by Equity-Weighting, Research Suggests
![environ research Flooded coastal path](https://cpree.princeton.edu/sites/g/files/toruqf651/files/styles/freeform_1440w/public/2024-06/article_banner_template_facebook_cover.jpg?h=f880bfe7&itok=5Earha2Q)
Photo Credit: Jax10289 from Getty Images
As the effects of climate change intensify, the need for efficient and equitable climate adaptation policies is becoming more urgent. This is especially true for U.S. coastal counties impacted by climate-induced sea-level rise and the socio-economically vulnerable areas within them that are often characterized by higher flood risks.
Conventional benefit-cost analyses used to allocate adaptation resources in coastal areas have often resulted in distributional inequities. In a study examining flooding adaptation measures in New York City (NYC), researchers at Princeton University and the Environmental Defense Fund show how a new type of benefit-cost analysis can better account for the value of flood mitigation benefits to low-income households.
The study focuses on two adaptation measures: property buyouts and retrofitting. Property buyouts are when governments purchase properties from residents in high flood-risk areas, while retrofitting involves elevating and wetproofing buildings. For each adaptation measure for each building, the researchers calculated benefit cost ratios (BCRs). The researchers calculated adaptation costs using data from the NYC Department of City Planning and the Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration. The benefits of each measure was quantified by calculating the value of expected avoided damages over a 50-year time horizon.
When the researchers used traditional valuation methods, the BCRs were highest in census tracts with fewer disadvantaged communities, implying that there may be an implicit bias in resource allocation towards less vulnerable populations.
“The current application of BCRs inherently favors affluent and non-disadvantaged communities due to their higher property values,” explains lead author Joe Lockwood , a Ph.D. student at the Department of Geoscience. “Essentially, the more valuable the property, the higher the avoided costs of damage appear, and the more justified the adaptation measure seems, economically. This skews our climate adaptation strategies to favor wealthy and non-disadvantaged communities, who may already possess the means to protect themselves.”
In an alternative model, the researchers recalculated benefit cost ratios with “equity-weighted” benefits that would operationalize the assumption that a dollar saved from avoided damages would have a greater effect on a low-income household’s well-being than a high-income household. In a benefit-cost analysis, these weights effectively place more value on the benefits of buyouts and home elevations in disadvantaged communities.
“The US Office of Management and Budget recently updated their guidelines to federal agencies to allow the use of these weights in federal benefit-cost analyses, but they have yet to be broadly applied,” explains co-author Jesse Gourevitch , a postdoctoral fellow in the Economics Team at the Environmental Defense Fund. “This work demonstrates the feasibility of implementing these weights and what their implications might be in practice.”
With the inclusion of equity weights, there was a substantial increase in BCRs for adaptation measures in communities such as the Bronx and Jamaica Bay. According to the researchers, this indicates that equity weightings have the potential to reduce bias in hazard mitigation funding within the United States.
“Some governmental decisions on flood recovery and adaptation are currently prioritized using Benefit-Cost Analysis,” explains Michael Oppenheimer , the director of the Center for Policy Research on Energy and the Environment and Albert G. Milbank Professor of Geosciences and International Affairs and the High Meadows Environmental Institute. “Continuing to use traditional formulas will continue historical inequity in outcomes of these programs. The new approach, if applied by governments, could begin to remedy this failure.”
The paper, “Socioeconomic distributional impacts of evaluating flood mitigation activities using equity-weighted benefit-cost analysis,” was co-authored by Joseph W. Lockwood (Department of Geoscience, Princeton University), Michael Oppenheimer (School of Public and International Affairs, Department of Geosciences, and the High Meadows Environmental Institute, Princeton University), Ning Lin (Civil and Environmental Engineering, Princeton University), and Jesse Gourevitch (Economics Team, Environmental Defense Fund). The paper appeared in Environmental Research Letters on June 14th, 2024. This study was supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation as part of the Megalopolitan Coastal Transformation Hub. Lockwood received support from the High Meadows Environmental Institute at Princeton University through the generous support of the William Clay Ford, Jr ’79 and Lisa Vanderzee Ford ’82 Graduate Fellowship Fund.
![environ research Michael Oppenheimer](https://cpree.princeton.edu/sites/g/files/toruqf651/files/styles/3x4_750w_1000h/public/people/omichael-photo-md.jpg?itok=YVPyclud)
Office of the Dean for Research
![environ research Home](https://research.princeton.edu/sites/g/files/toruqf1771/files/logo_dfr_0.png)
New research projects and collaborations selected for funding from the Office of the Dean for Research
![environ research Human figures standing in a robotics laboratory and interacting with machinery.](https://research.princeton.edu/sites/g/files/toruqf1771/files/styles/freeform_750w/public/2024-06/highres_roboticteritories_v2_dm_daniela-mitterberger-2.jpg?itok=8xuE8xXY)
A collaboration that explores dynamics among humans, machines, and the environment brings together researchers from the disciplines of architecture, computer science and physics. The project is one of several to be funded by the Office of the Dean for Research. Credit: Daniela Mitterberger, Princeton School of Architecture
New faculty-led projects in areas ranging from the arts and humanities to energy and the environment have been selected to receive funding from the Office of the Dean for Research.
The funds enable exploration of daring ideas and promising collaborations in ways that expand knowledge, impact society, and benefit the planet. Projects are selected via a competitive application process involving proposal reviews by anonymous peer-review panels.
“This funding grows the capacity for researchers to investigate unconventional or untested ideas that can be difficult to fund through traditional sources,” said Dean for Research Peter Schiffer, professor of physics. “Through these funds, Princeton makes such explorations possible.”
This year, the program selected projects in five themes:
New Ideas in the Humanities
New industrial collaborations, collaborations between artists and scientists or engineers, sustainability of our planet, exploratory energy research.
The New Ideas in the Humanities fund encourages innovative scholarship on original theories as well as enduring questions. Projects may involve the development of new ideas, working groups, conferences, technologies, datasets, expanded access to scholarly resources, or major pieces of scholarly work. The following projects were funded:
Launching the next phase of On TAP: A Theatre & Performance Studies Podcast
- Brian Herrera , Associate Professor of Theater, Lewis Center for the Arts
Originally launched in 2016, On TAP: A Theatre and Performance Studies Podcast has become a successful, far-reaching, and pathbreaking example of what collaborative humanities scholarship can be in the era of digital and social media. This award will enable a critical scholarly assessment of the podcast’s impact and allow OnTAP ’s continued production over the next two years.
Indian Ocean trade, the global Middle Ages and the Cairo Geniza
- Marina Rustow , Khedouri A. Zilkha Professor of Jewish Civilization in the Near East; Professor of Near Eastern Studies and History
Several hundred letters, legal deeds, lists and accounts dating from Indian Ocean traders from 1060 to 1250 C.E. will be published online and in print in the original Arabic, Aramaic, Hebrew and Judaeo-Arabic alongside English translations. The documents, which survived in a medieval Egyptian synagogue within a larger cache known as the Cairo Geniza, provide unparalleled information about global history before European colonialism.
Program in Law & Public Policy (P*LAW) project in legal journalism
- Deborah Pearlstein , Director, Program in Law and Public Policy (P*LAW); Charles and Marie Robertson Visiting Professor in Law and Public Affairs
This project will bring a distinguished visiting journalist to Princeton for a two-year residence to foster innovative methods of legal journalism through original investigative research. The project will improve factual and historical research methods through the study of comparative best practices, support original interviews regarding cases of current relevance and historic significance, and disseminate findings through public events and audiovisual and archival preservation.
The New Industrial Collaborations fund fosters research collaborations between industry and academia, helping to identify challenges and aiding the transformation of discoveries. The program requires a matching contribution from a collaborating company in the second year of the project. The following project was funded:
Real-time brain-to-image reconstructions and foundation models for neuroimaging data
- Kenneth Norman , Huo Professor in Computational and Theoretical Neuroscience; Professor of Psychology and Neuroscience; Chair, Department of Psychology
- Sanjeev Arora , Charles C. Fitzmorris Professor in Computer Science
- Jonathan Pillow , Professor of Princeton Neuroscience Institute
- Uri Hasson , Professor of Psychology and Neuroscience
- Industrial Collaborator : Stability AI
Princeton scientists will collaborate with researchers at Stability AI, an open-source generative artificial intelligence (AI) company, to build a system that can visually reconstruct images based on brain activity of patients after a single fMRI brain-imaging session over a timespan of a few seconds. Such a real-time system would, with the patient’s consent, enable researchers to view the patient’s internal mental experience, providing transformative implications for basic science discovery, clinical diagnosis and treatment.
The Collaborations between Artists and Scientists or Engineers fund encourages collaborations between faculty and scholars in the arts and those in the natural sciences or engineering to promote synergistic innovations, allowing experts in seemingly unrelated fields to expand their collective knowledge in ways that benefit both disciplines. The following projects were funded:
Forever chemicals, ecological futures: A collaboration of bioremediation science and multimedia storytelling
- José Avalos , Associate Professor of Chemical and Biological Engineering and the Andlinger Center for Energy and the Environment
- Allison Carruth , Professor of American Studies and the High Meadows Environmental Institute, Director of Blue Lab
- Peter Jaffe , William L. Knapp '47 Professor of Civil Engineering, Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering
- David Reinfurt , Professor of the Practice, Visual Arts in the Lewis Center for the Arts
This collaboration connects biological and environmental engineering with science communication and visual media to engage diverse communities with the ecological ubiquity of long-lived environmental contaminants known as per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). The researchers, which includes Research Associate Scholar Mansha Seth Pasricha , will combine the development of bioengineering solutions to biodegrade these forever chemicals with the production of an innovative lab-to-field series of mixed-media documentary shorts, data visualizations, and local events involving science museums, environmental justice groups, and community arts organizations to raise awareness and engage responses.
Robotic territories: A human-robot performance
- Daniela Mitterberger , Assistant Professor of Architecture
- Benjamin Eysenbach , Assistant Professor of Computer Science
- Gautam Reddy , Assistant Professor of Physics
This collaboration will investigate the dynamics among humans, machines, and the environment, advocating for a paradigm shift in how we understand and interact with our world through technology. The research aims to explore the complex domain of human and robotic interaction through the lens of performance, behavior, motion and representation with the investigative methods of research by design. The result of this research will be a live performance starring three robots and one human interacting in real-time using new bio-inspired artificial systems alongside augmented reality technologies and machine learning algorithms.
The Sustainability of Our Planet fund focuses on discovering, developing, and adopting sustainable solutions aimed at mitigating the effects of natural resource extraction and use, climate change, land-use change, and other human activities that degrade the environment and pollute Earth. Made possible thanks to the extraordinary vision and generosity of John McDonnell, Class of 1960, the fund is co-organized by the Office of the Dean for Research, the Andlinger Center for Energy and the Environment, and the High Meadows Environmental Institute Innovation. The following projects were funded:
Accelerated discovery of ion-selective electrodes for industrial wastewater refining
- Ryan Kingsbury , Assistant Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Andlinger Center for Energy and the Environment
This project explores a new approach to reclaiming valuable metals such as copper, nickel, lead and zinc from industrial wastewater. The technology relies on a family of chemical structures known as Prussian Blue analogs (PBAs) that act as electrodes to attract and trap specific metals. The team will conduct computational screenings to identify and optimize PBA structures, and then produce the structures and test them for their ability to remove metals. The approach has the potential to minimize waste of industrial metals, enhance recycling, and reduce dependence on mining.
Agriculture to architecture: Straw building material
- Paul Lewis , Professor of Architecture
- Guy Nordenson , Professor of Architecture
This project will research and test straw-based construction systems with the goal of reducing emissions of carbon dioxide from building materials while fostering economic and social benefits. An agricultural byproduct, straw is inexpensive, lightweight, fast growing, and able to sequester significant amounts of carbon when used in building construction. The team will explore technical designs for straw as both insulation and structural components in ways that lead to new forms of architecture while supporting growing construction demands.
Design of zeotype-confined amines for carbon capture in humid environments
- Marcella Lusardi , Assistant Professor of Chemical and Biological Engineering and the Princeton Materials Institute
Materials that capture carbon dioxide from the air could play an important role in meeting climate change goals. One promising class of adsorbent materials for carbon capture is zeolites, which afford tunability in critical properties like confinement and composition, and have demonstrated success in many commercialized technologies at scale. This project will investigate methods of tailoring the structure and polarity of zeolites to improve their ability to capture carbon in humid environments.
The Exploratory Energy Research fund exemplifies the University’s commitment to support innovative curiosity-driven energy research through new ideas and concepts aimed at finding sustainable energy solutions. The fund was established as part of Princeton’s larger Energy Research Fund . The following project was funded:
Innovative Hybrid Plasma-Electrochemical System for Efficient and Selective Green Ammonia Synthesis
- Yiguang Ju , Robert Porter Patterson Professor of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering
This project will pioneer an environmentally friendly method for making ammonia, a chemical that can be useful in future hydrogen-based energy storage, transport and usage. The method will involve development of several technologies, including tungsten-based membranes and plasma-assisted membrane surface nitrification, which makes it possible to produce ammonia at much lower temperatures than are required for current production methods. The study will enable the efficient and sustainable synthesis of ammonia from nitrogen and water using renewable electricity.
![environ research environ research](https://www.canr.msu.edu/framework/images/canr-print-header.png)
W.K. Kellogg Biological Station KBS Long-Term Agroecosystem Research
New prairie strip partial budget tool.
Rachel Drobnak <[email protected]> , Fahimeh Baziari, Scott Swinton <[email protected]> , Christine Charles <[email protected]> , Brook Wilke <[email protected]> , Elizabeth Schultheis, Jon LaPorte <[email protected]> , Christine Sprunger <[email protected]> , John Tyndall, Matt Gammans and Julie Doll <[email protected]> , Michigan State University - June 18, 2024
What does it cost to convert cropland to prairie strips?
Conservation practices require a significant investment in time and money. There are often large implementation costs, learning curves and labor required, all of which might prevent farmers and landowners from being able to adopt these practices. Additionally, when there are no tangible payments or products, the financial benefits may seem invisible. Yet, conservation practices provide many benefits to the cropping system, often by improving soil health, protecting water quality and increasing yield stability. Because of this, farmers are often eligible for payments which can offset or even result in profit when converting cropland into a conservation practice. While difficult to quantify, there are tools to help estimate the return on investment for conservation practices.
One new practice gaining traction in Michigan, prairie strips, involves converting up to 10% of cropland to a mixture of perennial grasses, flowers and forbs. Compared to other conservation practices, prairie strips require minimal management and provide multiple environmental benefits. Prairie strips have been shown to reduce nutrient leaching, provide habitat for pollinators and prevent soil erosion, all without reducing crop yields adjacent to the prairie strip. Economically, prairie strips can increase the net profit of a field, if installed strategically. This is because prairie strips have the potential to cost less than producing crops in consistently low-yielding portions of a field.
To help navigate the costs, savings and payments associated with prairie strips, a collaborative team of scientists, economists, outreach specialists and Extension educators at Michigan State University has come together to develop a new partial budget tool. The tool predicts that prairie strips could save farmers money if planted in areas where crops yield below 50% of the statewide average. These areas, often field borders, low-lying areas or cumbersome extensions of fields, may cost more to put into production than to restore to prairie. Additionally, if enrolling in the CRP-43 prairie strip program or other incentive programs, the cost-savings of prairie conversion increase.
The partial budget bulletin is available here and on the MiSTRIPS website . This bulletin includes a downloadable Excel spreadsheet , which can be adjusted to accurately fit individual field operations.
If you are interested in learning more about prairie strips or are considering installing them, please contact Elizabeth Schultheis, MiSTRIPS program coordinator, at [email protected] .
Support for this project was provided by MiSTRIPS, Kellogg Biological Station Long-Term Ecological Research and the following grants: Doug and Maria Bayer Initiative (PD 63262) and Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education (SARE) Research and Education Grant (LNC23-494).
This article was published by Michigan State University Extension . For more information, visit https://extension.msu.edu . To have a digest of information delivered straight to your email inbox, visit https://extension.msu.edu/newsletters . To contact an expert in your area, visit https://extension.msu.edu/experts , or call 888-MSUE4MI (888-678-3464).
Did you find this article useful?
Haul manure? Check out the Michigan Manure Hauler Certification Program!
Check out the MSU Fruit, Vegetable & Organic Horticulture Management Program!
new - method size: 3 - Random key: 0, method: tagSpecific - key: 0
You Might Also Be Interested In
Designing cropping systems for healthier soils, improved biodiversity, and more profit.
Published on February 28, 2023
KBS LTAR Cropping Systems Field Day 2023
Kbs long-term agroecosystems research field day.
How can I make the best decision on whether to “plant green” this year or not?
Published on June 1, 2023
Growing nitrogen with legume cover crops
Published on May 10, 2023
Kellogg Biological Station joins multi-state effort to increase the adoption of prairie strips across the Midwest
Published on August 17, 2021
- agriculture
- agriculture and environment
- beginning farmer
- budget tool
- conservation agriculture
- farm business financial analysis
- farm cost of production
- farm management
- field crops
- fruit & nuts
- kellogg biological station
- long-term agroecosystem research
- msu extension
- organic agriculture
- pollinators and pollination
- prairie strips
- soil health
- agriculture,
- agriculture and environment,
- beginning farmer,
- budget tool,
- conservation agriculture,
- farm business financial analysis,
- farm cost of production,
- farm management,
- field crops,
- fruit & nuts,
- kellogg biological station,
- long-term agroecosystem research,
- msu extension,
- organic agriculture,
- pollinators and pollination,
- prairie strips,
- soil health,
- Read the latest KBS LTAR news
LTAR Network
- Learn more about the LTAR Network
W.K. Kellogg Biological Station
- Learn more about the W.K. Kellogg Biological Station
KBS Long-Term Ecological Research
- Learn more about the KBS Long-Term Ecological Research Program
Why scientists fear a second Trump term, and what they are doing about it
Several federal agencies are working to safeguard research, including climate science, from future political meddling.
When the union representing nearly half of Environmental Protection Agency employees approved a new contract with the federal government this month, it included an unusual provision that had nothing to do with pay, benefits or workplace flexibility: protections from political meddling into their work.
The protections, which ensure workers can report any meddling without fear of “retribution, reprisal, or retaliation,” are “a way for us to get in front of a second Trump administration and protect our workers,” said Marie Owens Powell, an EPA gas station storage tank inspector and president of American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE) Council 238.
The agreement signals the extent to which career employees and Biden administration officials are racing to foil any efforts to interfere with climate science or weaken environmental agencies should former president Donald Trump win a second term. Trump and his allies, in contrast, argue that bloated federal agencies have hurt economic development nationwide and that the Biden administration has prioritized climate science at the expense of other priorities.
“One of the things that is so bad for us is the environmental agencies. They make it impossible to do anything,” the former president said in an interview with “Fox & Friends” that aired June 2, claiming that “they’ve stopped you from doing business in this country.”
The Trump administration sidelined, muted or forced out hundreds of scientists and misrepresented research on the coronavirus , reproduction and hurricane forecasting , environmental advocates said. Now as an example of what’s to come, they point to a blueprint called “Project 2025,” a plan for the next conservative administration drafted by right-wing think tanks in Washington.
The plan calls for a sweeping reorganization of the executive branch, one that would concentrate more power in Trump’s hands. At the EPA, it recommends eliminating the office of environmental justice , which was created in 2022 to address the pollution that disproportionately harms poor and minority communities.
Soon after President Biden took office, his administration began imposing scientific integrity policies across the federal government, setting rules that protect research from political interference or manipulation. Many such policies are in place — though research advocates say they aren’t durable because they aren’t enshrined in federal law, and could be undone with new executive actions.
At the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, where a 2020 investigation found that agency leaders violated its scientific integrity policy after Trump showed a doctored hurricane forecast map , stricter standards took effect in March. A similar policy will soon be extended to the Commerce Department, including to the political appointees whose violations were detailed in the 2020 probe.
At the EPA, the new scientific integrity provision is part of a four-year contract with the agency. The provision ensures that workers’ complaints will be assessed by an independent investigator, rather than a political appointee.
While any new president could quickly transform policies around scientific integrity through new executive orders, the union contract provision is one advocates had urged as a way to make the protections harder to undo without a legal fight.
Powell said the Trump administration especially targeted climate researchers at the agency. Trump has called global warming a “hoax,” and during his first year in office, his political appointees barred three EPA scientists from speaking about climate change at a conference in Rhode Island.
Mandy Gunasekara, who served as EPA chief of staff under Trump, rejected allegations that his administration tried to suppress climate science. She said this research is likely to continue regardless of who’s in the White House.
“Climate change will continue to be an important issue in a future conservative administration, but it’s not going to be the most important issue so that it displaces the agency fulfilling its full mission,” said Gunasekara, who wrote the chapter on the EPA in “Project 2025.”
There are nonetheless heavy anxieties within the EPA over the Project 2025 proposals, said Jennifer Orme-Zavaleta, a former EPA official who advised agency leaders this week at a regularly scheduled meeting on the transition to the next administration. She said she reminded them that proposals to cut staff, for example, would require the cooperation of Congress.
“A lot of things on the wish list can’t happen that easily,” said Orme-Zavaleta, who serves on the board of the Environmental Protection Network, a group of former EPA employees that works to support the agency and its mission.
EPA spokesman Remmington Belford said in an email that the agency is “pleased” with the contract provision and “committed to ensuring the agency has a strong foundation of science that is free from political interference and inappropriate influence.”
While helpful, the provision won’t be a panacea, said Tim Whitehouse, the executive director of Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility, a nonprofit advocacy group, which helped advise AFGE on the scientific integrity language.
“It will be impossible to fully Trump-proof any agency or protect any scientist if Trump wins a new term and either the House or Senate is in Republican control,” Whitehouse said. “Then there will be absolutely no meaningful oversight.”
Interior Department braces for more cuts
The Interior Department — which manages vast swaths of public land and federal waters and oversees everything from offshore oil drilling to endangered species protections — could come under intense scrutiny in a second Trump administration.
In the interview with “Fox & Friends,” Trump was asked about government programs that he would slash in a second term. “We’re going to do, like, Department of Interior,” he said in response.
It remains unclear whether Trump wants to eliminate the Interior Department or merely reduce its budget and staffing levels. Karoline Leavitt, a spokeswoman for Trump’s 2024 campaign, did not directly respond to a request for clarification.
Trump “cut red tape and gave the [oil and gas] industry more freedom to do what they do best — utilize the liquid gold under our feet to produce clean energy for America and the world — and he will do that again as soon as he gets back to the White House,” Leavitt said in an emailed statement.
Career employees exited the Interior Department in droves during Trump’s four years in office. At the end of his presidency, there were 4,900 fewer employees at the agency than at the beginning, according to data from the Office of Personnel Management.
The exodus was especially large at Interior’s Bureau of Land Management, which oversees roughly 245 million acres of public lands. After Trump briefly moved the BLM’s headquarters from Washington to Grand Junction, Colo., more than 87 percent of the affected employees either resigned or retired.
William Perry Pendley, who served as acting BLM director under Trump, defended the relocation, saying the vast majority of public lands are in the West.
“If you want to be involved with the stakeholders — the governors, the county commissioners, the local people — then you’ve got to be out West,” Pendley said, adding that Biden administration officials in Washington are “badly out of touch.”
In addition to the BLM move, in July 2017, then-Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke reassigned dozens of top career officials as part of a broader reorganization of the department. Joel Clement, a scientist and policy expert, was removed from his role as director of Interior’s Office of Policy Analysis and reassigned to an accounting position for which he had no experience.
In a whistleblower complaint with the U.S. Office of Special Counsel — and in an opinion piece in The Washington Post — Clement accused Zinke of illegally trying to force career staffers to quit.
“That incident was a case study in them going after the people who do the science,” Clement, who now works at a philanthropic foundation, said in an interview. Ultimately, Interior’s internal watchdog found no written communications from Zinke that supported the allegation.
In April, the Office of Personnel Management finalized a rule that will allow federal employees to keep their existing job protections and right to due process, including the right to appeal a reassignment or firing. The rule overturns a Trump directive, known as Schedule F, that allowed his administration to force out thousands of career employees by changing their status to at-will workers who could be fired without due process.
New federal law is needed, some say
NOAA leaders and observers said the agency is better equipped to withstand the sort of pressure scientists faced when Hurricane Dorian was approaching the U.S. coast in 2019, and Trump used a marker to extend the hurricane forecast cone to include Alabama.
His warning prompted a quick clarification from NOAA forecasters that Alabama was not, in fact, in the likely path of the storm, and then a statement from agency leaders reaffirming Trump’s incorrect assertion. An investigation found undue political influence led to the release of that statement, violating NOAA’s scientific integrity policy.
The agency has since updated that research policy — in January 2021 and again this March, said Cynthia Decker, NOAA’s scientific integrity officer.
The policy includes guidelines on how scientists should conduct themselves, and asks them to articulate their findings openly and clearly to the public. It establishes that “credible allegations of fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, and interference with or undue influence on accurate public reporting of science” can result in “personnel actions” and even referral to the inspector general’s office.
An extension of those policies to cover the Commerce Department is expected in the coming months, Decker said. It would include a mechanism by which even political appointees could be subject to allegations that they violated the integrity policy, something that could lead to a review or investigation and potential discipline, Decker said.
These updates are important because they set “that moral and intellectual compass to remind people where the curbs are in the road,” said Craig McLean, a 40-year veteran of NOAA who served as the agency’s acting chief scientist during the Trump administration.
But as strong as the policies may be, they aren’t permanent, some critics note. Legislation introduced in the two most recent sessions of Congress would have codified a requirement that federal agencies adopt scientific integrity policies and could establish legal penalties for violating them.
With such a law in place, “the next president can’t say, ‘No, I don’t care,’” when violations of scientific integrity arise, said Andrew Rosenberg, a former NOAA official and a senior adviser at the Center for Ocean Leadership at the University Corporation for Atmospheric Research.
Daniel Weiner, director of the elections and government program at New York University’s Brennan Center for Justice, said government scientists will inevitably face pressures from on high.
“There are always going to be political concerns pushing back on the science,” Weiner said. “I would expect that regardless of who wins the election.”
![environ research](https://www.washingtonpost.com/dr/resources/images/generic-newsletter-signup.png)
Numbers, Facts and Trends Shaping Your World
Read our research on:
Full Topic List
Regions & Countries
- Publications
- Our Methods
- Short Reads
- Tools & Resources
Read Our Research On:
- How Americans Get News on TikTok, X, Facebook and Instagram
1. TikTok users’ experiences with news
Table of contents.
- How people get news on TikTok
- Views about news on TikTok
- How people get news on X
- Views about news on X
- How people get news on Facebook
- Views about news on Facebook
- How people get news on Instagram
- Views about news on Instagram
- Acknowledgments
- The American Trends Panel survey methodology
TikTok is an increasingly popular source of news for Americans – particularly young adults. A 2023 Pew Research Center study found that 14% of all U.S. adults say they regularly get news on the video-based platform . Among TikTok users, the share regularly getting news there is growing. And the vast majority of adult TikTok news consumers are under age 50, including 44% who are 18 to 29.
But TikTok’s future in the United States is uncertain. ByteDance, the platform’s China-based owner, is facing an order from the U.S. government to either divest from TikTok or be banned in the country.
Our survey looks at U.S. TikTok users’ experiences with getting news. Among the key findings:
- Regardless of whether they turn to TikTok for news, most users see news-related content. TikTok users report seeing funny posts (84%) and people’s opinions (80%) related to current events at higher rates than news articles (57%) or breaking news information (55%).
- TikTok news consumers are equally likely to get news from influencers or celebrities as they are from news outlets or journalists. About two-thirds of those who regularly get news on TikTok (68%) say they ever get news from influencers or celebrities, and 67% get news from news outlets or journalists. An even higher share (84%) say they get news from other people they don’t know personally (beyond influencers, journalists, advocacy groups, and friends, family and acquaintances).
- TikTok news consumers are more likely than Americans who get news on Facebook and Instagram to view the news they get there as unique . Among those who regularly get news on TikTok, 35% say the news they get there is mostly news they would not have gotten elsewhere. By comparison, 14% of Facebook news consumers say the same about news they see on Facebook.
![environ research Bar chart about 4 in 10 TikTok users cite news as a reason they use the platform](https://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2024/05/PJ_2024.06.12_social-media-platforms-news_1-01.png?w=620)
Four-in-ten TikTok users say they regularly get news on the site. And when it comes to the reasons Americans use TikTok, relatively few cite news.
Read more: Reasons for using TikTok
Among TikTok users, 15% say getting news is a major reason they use the platform, with an additional 26% citing it as a minor reason. The majority of users, however, say getting news is not a reason they use TikTok (58%).
![environ research Bar chart showing most TikTok users see humor and opinions about news](https://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2024/05/PJ_2024.06.12_social-media-platforms-news_1-02.png?w=840)
Regardless of whether they turn to TikTok for news, a majority of TikTok users report seeing news-related content on the platform.
Most users say they ever see funny posts that reference current events (84%) or people expressing opinions about current events (80%) on TikTok. Smaller majorities say they ever see news articles (57%) – whether from posts, reposts, links or screenshots – or information about a breaking news event as it’s happening (55%) on the platform.
What sources people get news from on TikTok
TikTok news consumers are equally likely to get news from influencers or celebrities as they are from news outlets or journalists.
![environ research Bar chart showing influencers or celebrities and the news media are equally common news sources on TikTok](https://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2024/05/PJ_2024.06.12_social-media-platforms-news_1-03.png?w=840)
Among U.S. adults who say they regularly get news on TikTok, around two-thirds say they ever get news on the platform from influencers or celebrities (68%) or from news outlets or journalists (67%). Other sources of information, such as advocacy or nonprofit organizations (55%) and friends, family and acquaintances (48%), are less common.
Beyond these four types of sources, the vast majority of TikTok news consumers (84%) say they get news from other people they don’t know personally . In fact, accounts in this category are the most commonly cited source of news for TikTok news consumers, who are more likely than news consumers on other major social media sites to get news from other people they don’t know personally.
Inaccurate information
![environ research Bar chart 23% of TikTok news consumers say they often see news that seems inaccurate](https://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2024/05/PJ_2024.06.12_social-media-platforms-news_1-04.png?w=620)
About a quarter of U.S. adults who regularly get news on TikTok (23%) say they extremely or fairly often see news on the platform that seems inaccurate. Roughly half (49%) say they sometimes see information that seems inaccurate, while 28% say they rarely or never see inaccurate news.
Views by party
Among TikTok news consumers, similar shares of Republicans and independents who lean toward the Republican Party (22%) and Democrats and Democratic leaners (23%) say they often see news that seems inaccurate on the platform.
TikTok’s influence on the news users see
![environ research Bar chart showing most TikTok news consumers think TikTok influences the news they see](https://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2024/05/PJ_2024.06.12_social-media-platforms-news_1-05.png?w=620)
As lawmakers express concerns about the potential for the Chinese government to influence content on TikTok, most U.S. TikTok news consumers say they think the platform influences which news stories they see there at least to some extent. This includes roughly one-in-five (18%) who say TikTok influences the news content they see there a lot and an additional 44% who say TikTok does this some.
About a quarter of TikTok news consumers (27%) say the site does not influence which news stories they see there much, while 11% say TikTok exerts no influence at all.
Similar shares of Republicans (59%) and Democrats (63%) say they think TikTok influences which news stories they see on the platform at least somewhat.
TikTok as a source of unique news
![environ research Bar chart showing 35% of TikTok news consumers say news on TikTok is mostly news they wouldn’t have seen elsewhere](https://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2024/05/PJ_2024.06.12_social-media-platforms-news_1-06.png?w=840)
There is no consensus among U.S. adults who regularly get news on TikTok whether the news they get there is mostly unique or not. About a third (35%) say it’s mostly news they would not have gotten elsewhere, while 27% say it is mostly news they would have gotten elsewhere if they did not use TikTok. And 37% say the news they get on TikTok consists of both kinds of information about equally.
![environ research Butterfly chart showing Democrats more likely to say the news they get on TikTok is news they would have gotten elsewhere](https://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2024/05/PJ_2024.06.12_social-media-platforms-news_1-07.png?w=840)
Democrats (33%) are more likely than Republicans (18%) to say the news they get on TikTok is mostly news they would have gotten elsewhere if they didn’t use the platform.
Feeling worn out by news on TikTok
![environ research Bar chart showing about half of TikTok news consumers are rarely or never worn out by news content on the platform](https://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2024/05/PJ_2024.06.12_social-media-platforms-news_1-08.png?w=620)
Americans who regularly get news on TikTok are less likely to say they feel worn out by the news they see there compared with news consumers on the other sites studied.
About one-in-ten TikTok news consumers (11%) say they extremely or fairly often feel worn out by the news they see on the platform, while 36% say they sometimes do.
News consumers who see at least some political content (i.e., posts about politics or political issues) on TikTok are more likely than those who see less politics-related content to feel worn out by the news they see on the platform at least sometimes (56% vs. 33%).
Sign up for our weekly newsletter
Fresh data delivery Saturday mornings
Sign up for The Briefing
Weekly updates on the world of news & information
- Social Media & the News
- Twitter (X)
How Americans Navigate Politics on TikTok, X, Facebook and Instagram
Many americans find value in getting news on social media, but concerns about inaccuracy have risen, social media and news fact sheet, social media seen as mostly good for democracy across many nations, but u.s. is a major outlier, the role of alternative social media in the news and information environment, most popular, report materials.
1615 L St. NW, Suite 800 Washington, DC 20036 USA (+1) 202-419-4300 | Main (+1) 202-857-8562 | Fax (+1) 202-419-4372 | Media Inquiries
Research Topics
- Email Newsletters
ABOUT PEW RESEARCH CENTER Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan fact tank that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping the world. It conducts public opinion polling, demographic research, media content analysis and other empirical social science research. Pew Research Center does not take policy positions. It is a subsidiary of The Pew Charitable Trusts .
© 2024 Pew Research Center
Accessibility Links
- Skip to content
- Skip to search IOPscience
- Skip to Journals list
- Accessibility help
- Accessibility Help
Click here to close this panel.
![environ research ERE graphic iopscience_header.png](https://cms.iopscience.org/d767d356-1f38-11ef-9a9e-5b54854342ba/ERE graphic iopscience_header.png?guest=true)
Purpose-led Publishing is a coalition of three not-for-profit publishers in the field of physical sciences: AIP Publishing, the American Physical Society and IOP Publishing.
Together, as publishers that will always put purpose above profit, we have defined a set of industry standards that underpin high-quality, ethical scholarly communications.
We are proudly declaring that science is our only shareholder.
- About the journal
Journal links
- Submit an article
- Editorial Board
- Author guidelines
- Review for this journal
- Publication charges
- Journal collections
![](http://2me.site/777/templates/cheerup/res/banner1.gif)
IMAGES
COMMENTS
Environmental Research is a multi-disciplinary journal publishing high quality and novel information about anthropogenic issues of global relevance and applicability in a wide range of environmental disciplines, and demonstrating …. View full aims & scope. $3590. Article publishing charge. for open access.
2010 — Volume 110. 2009 — Volume 109. 2008 — Volumes 106-108. 2007 — Volumes 103-105. 2006 — Volumes 100-102. 2005 — Volumes 97-99. Page 1 of 3. Read the latest articles of Environmental Research at ScienceDirect.com, Elsevier's leading platform of peer-reviewed scholarly literature.
Short-term air pollution exposure is associated with lower severity and mixed features of manic episodes in hospitalized bipolar patients: A cross-sectional study in Milan, Italy. Michele Carugno, Dario Palpella, Alessandro Ceresa, Angela Cecilia Pesatori, Massimiliano Buoli. Article 110943. View PDF. Article preview.
Environmental science is the multidisciplinary study of all aspects of the Earth's physical and biological environments. It encompasses environmental chemistry, soil science, ecology ...
Environmental Science & Technology is a Transformative Journal. Environmental Science & Technology has been certified as a transformative journal by cOAlition S, committing to a transition to 100% open access in the future. If your research funder has signed Plan S, your open access charges may be covered by your funder through December 31, 2024.
Scope. Environmental Research publishes original reports describing studies of the adverse effects of environmental agents on humans and animals. The principal aim of the journal is to assess the impact of chemicals and microbiological pollutants on human health. Both in vivo and in vitro studies, focused on defining the etiology of ...
Environmental Research is a peer-reviewed environmental science and environmental health journal published by Elsevier. The editor in chief is Jose L. Domingo. The journal's 2020 impact factor of 6.498 placed it 16th out of 203 journals in the category Public, Environmental, ...
The primary goal of Sustainable Environment Research (SER) is to publish high quality research articles associated with sustainable environmental science and technology and to contribute to improving environmental practice. The scope of SER includes issues of environmental science, technology, management and related fields, especially in ...
Environmental Research: Climate is a multidisciplinary, open access journal devoted to addressing important challenges concerning the physical science and assessment of climate systems and global change in a way that bridges efforts relating to impact/future risks, resilience, mitigation, adaptation, security and solutions in the broadest sense.
ISSN: 1748-9326. OPEN ACCESS. Environmental Research Letters covers all of environmental science, providing a coherent and integrated approach including research articles, perspectives and review articles. Click here to register for the Environmental Research 2023 virtual event. Submit an article opens in new tab Track my article opens in new tab.
Environmental Research: Infrastructure and Sustainability is a multidisciplinary, open access journal that addresses important challenges relevant to infrastructure, sustainability and resilience in their broadest sense. Encompassing environmental, economic and social factors, all research methodologies are encouraged covering qualitative, quantitative, experimental, theoretical and applied ...
Introduction Environmental Research is a multi-disciplinary journal publishing high quality and novel information about anthropogenic issues of global relevance and applicability in a wide range of environmental disciplines, and demonstrating environmental application in the real-world context. Coverage includes, but is not limited to, the following research topics and areas:
The International Journal of Environmental Research ( IJER) is an international and multidisciplinary platform for researchers across the globe to swiftly publish, share and discuss new findings and developments in environmental science, engineering, and management. IJER is an interdisciplinary journal concerned with all aspects of the environment.
Environmental Science and Pollution Research (ESPR) serves the international community in all broad areas of environmental science and related subjects with emphasis on chemical compounds. Covers all areas of Environmental Science and related subjects. Publishes on the natural sciences, but also includes the impacts of legislation, regulation ...
Environmental Systems Research publishes high-quality, interdisciplinary and refereed research papers, review and comment articles, and topical collections on all aspects of environmental systems from water (terrestrial and marine), air, soil and biota.The journal aims to advance and apply scientific knowledge and practical methods to improve our understanding of environmental and ...
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health is a transdisciplinary, peer-reviewed, open access journal published monthly online by MDPI.It covers Global Health, Healthcare Sciences, Behavioral and Mental Health, Infectious Diseases, Chronic Diseases and Disease Prevention, Exercise and Health Related Quality of Life, Environmental Health and Environmental Sciences.
OPEN ACCESS. Environmental Research: Ecology is a multidisciplinary, open access journal devoted to addressing important global challenges at the interface of environmental science, large scale ecology, biodiversity and conservation in a way that bridges scientific progress and assessment with efforts relating to impacts of global change, resilience, mitigation and adaptation in the broadest ...
Cara Clase, Ph.D., Center for Policy Research on Energy and the Environment. June 17, 2024. Share on X Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Email this page Print this page. As the effects of climate change intensify, the need for efficient and equitable climate adaptation policies is becoming more urgent. This is especially true for U.S. coastal ...
Surface tuning and interface engineering of advanced materials for detection and removal of toxic pollutants from industrial wastewater. Myong Yong Choi, Jayaraman Theerthagiri, Madhavan Jagannathan, Gilberto Maia. Article 112950. View PDF. EditorialFull text access.
June 10, 2024. The Environmental Defense Fund will finance research into technologies that could artificially cool the planet, an idea that until recently was viewed as radical but is quickly ...
The paper appeared in Environmental Research Letters on June 14th, 2024. This study was supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation as part of the Megalopolitan Coastal Transformation Hub. Lockwood received support from the High Meadows Environmental Institute at Princeton University through the generous support of the William Clay Ford ...
New faculty-led projects in areas ranging from the arts and humanities to energy and the environment have been selected to receive funding from the Office of the Dean for Research. The funds enable exploration of daring ideas and promising collaborations in ways that expand knowledge, impact society, and benefit the planet.
ISSN: 1748-9326. OPEN ACCESS. Environmental Research Letters covers all of environmental science, providing a coherent and integrated approach including research articles, perspectives and review articles. Submit an article Track my article. RSS.
One new practice gaining traction in Michigan, prairie strips, involves converting up to 10% of cropland to a mixture of perennial grasses, flowers and forbs. Compared to other conservation practices, prairie strips require minimal management and provide multiple environmental benefits. Prairie strips have been shown to reduce nutrient leaching ...
A reusable and sensitive electrochemical sensor for determination of idarubicin in environmental and biological samples based on NiFe2O4 nanospheres anchored N-doped graphene quantum dots composite; an electrochemical and molecular docking investigation. Mohammad Mehmandoust, Pouran Pourhakkak, Gizem Tiris, Hassan Karimi-Maleh, Nevin Erk.
The Trump administration sidelined, muted or forced out hundreds of scientists and misrepresented research on the coronavirus, reproduction and hurricane forecasting, environmental advocates said ...
Environmental Research: Health is a multidisciplinary, open access journal devoted to addressing important global challenges at the interface of the environment and public health in a way that bridges scientific progress and assessment with efforts relating to impact/future risks, resilience, mitigation, adaptation, security and solutions in ...
Investigations of acute effects of polystyrene and polyvinyl chloride micro- and nanoplastics in an advanced in vitro triple culture model of the healthy and inflamed intestine. Mathias Busch, Gerrit Bredeck, Angela A.M. Kämpfer, Roel P.F. Schins. Article 110536. View PDF.
A 2023 Pew Research Center study found that 14% of all U.S. adults say they regularly get news on the video-based platform. Among TikTok users, the share regularly getting news there is growing. And the vast majority of adult TikTok news consumers are under age 50, including 44% who are 18 to 29. But TikTok's future in the United States is ...
Scope. Environmental Research: Ecology is a multidisciplinary, open access journal devoted to addressing important global challenges at the interface of environmental science, large scale ecology, biodiversity and conservation in a way that bridges scientific progress and assessment with efforts relating to impacts of global change, resilience, mitigation and adaptation in the broadest sense.